DOCSLIB.ORG

3.03 Seagrasses of Southeastern Australia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3.03 Seagrasses of Southeastern Australia Chapter 3.3 — Seagrasses of southeastern Australia • 276 3.3 Seagrasses of southeastern Australia Robert J. Williams1, P. R. Scanes2 and James Udy3 1Senior Research Scientist (retired), NSW Department of Primary Industries (Fisheries), Australia 2Senior Team Leader Estuaries and Catchment Science, NSW Office of Environment and Heritage, Australia 3Chief Scientist, Queensland Healthy Waterways, Australia Abstract The southeast portion of Australia has a high energy coastline that generally prohibits growth of seagrasses except in sheltered bays and estuaries. This is also the most densely populated portion of the country, meaning that seagrasses are subject to pressures from agriculture, industry, and urban activities. Yet the maintenance of healthy seagrass meadows is critical to the economy of these regions as it forms a critical link in the food chain of many recreational and commercial fish species as well as providing other functions. In order to generate a better understanding of these pressures and derive appropriate economic and environmental outcomes, an understanding of the biology of seagrasses and their value to the community is critical. This chapter presents an overview of the seagrass habitats of SE Australia as well as the differing management approaches in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria. It also provides an overview of the role of community monitoring projects in providing important information for management of these critical habitats. Chapter 3.3 — Seagrasses of southeastern Australia • 277 Introduction of the ever growing population pressure to use the locations in which seagrasses live – the shallow The body of knowledge about seagrasses in inshore waters of bays, lagoons and estuaries. Australia, and at the global scale is extensive (see texts in the supplementary reading list). Recent The objectives of this chapter are to provide: output from a National Working Group (see ACEAS • an introduction to seagrass biology and its (Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and implications for conservation management; Synthesis)) has differentiated three main Australian bio-regions for seagrass: Tropical and Sub-tropical • a simple comparison of the basis for Northern Australia, Temperate SE Australia, management between three principal Temperate SW Australia. This chapter focuses management authorities along the southeast on the seagrasses of the temperate southeast sector of the mainland (southern Queensland, Australian coast, defined somewhat arbitrarily New South Wales, eastern Victoria); and based on the north-south orientation of the coast • a differentiation of the types of community as stretching from the Noosa River (Queensland) monitoring that has been and might be to Corner Inlet in Victoria. The extensive meadows initiated to assist in determining the well being of seagrass in the Great Barrier Reef and those of of beds of seagrass in southeast Australia. Western Port, Port Philip Bay and western Victoria deserve mention at another time. Relative to the There are many species of seagrass, most of which entire Australian coastline this represents less have a specific shape, distribution and behaviour, than 10% of the coastline, but with more than and so it is more apt in scientific and management 80% of Australia’s population. The distribution terms to refer to “seagrasses” rather than seagrass. of seagrasses in the south-east also differs from This is particularly so in the management sense other parts of the continent, being confined with as there is a need to understand better their estuaries and bays rather than forming extensive individual conservation needs. (The same situation offshore meadows as occurs in southern and also prevails with “mangroves”, Chapter 3.4; and western Australia. Each of the states within the “saltmarsh”, Chapter 3.5). southeast sector recognises the value of seagrass At the global scale there is considerable concern (e.g. Queensland: AquaBAMM, Clayton et al. about the present management of seagrasses 2006) and various initiatives are in place to assess and their long term fate (Orth et al. 2006; Global seagrass condition for protection and planning Seagrass Trajectories Working Group 2009). Within purposes (e.g. Queensland: seagrass depth range Australia there is a recent effort to identify and monitoring in Moreton Bay). Further, there are synthesise current knowledge and threats to state-wide reviews based on extensive local seagrasses to support management actions aimed literature (e.g. Victoria: Warry and Hindell 2009). at maintaining healthy meadows. This Seagrass Although the importance of seagrass in protecting Working Group (online), supported by ACEAS, has community values for estuaries and coastal regions initiated two review papers. The first explores the was poorly understood in the past, the role seagrass different spatial and temporal scales at which plays in supporting coastal fisheries and reducing anthropogenic and natural processes impact on coastal erosion is becoming more understood seagrasses and will provide managers with an and appreciated by the wider community. This understanding of the most appropriate monitoring increased awareness has been assisted by many approaches to assess seagrass condition. The different approaches. One that has assisted greatly second paper will update a previous assessment of is the involvement of community associations, the distribution of seagrass around the Australian such as Coastcare and other local groups that have Coast (Mount and Bricher 2008), provide conceptual become actively involved in the monitoring of understanding of the major processes important for these habitats and the role of seagrasses in coastal maintaining seagrass habitats in the different bio- ecology. Community awareness continues to grow regions of Australia and provide a risk assessment as a result of research efforts to understand better framework for the sustainability of seagrass along the biology of seagrasses and the translation of the Australian coast. those outputs into protective legislation, policy and Taxonomy guidelines. This chapter provides an overview of the management of seagrasses in the southeast “Seagrasses” are a diverse group of aquatic sector of Australia. This sector is instructive because plants that evolved from terrestrial counterparts millions of years ago to inhabit shallow coastal Chapter 3.3 — Seagrasses of southeastern Australia • 278 and estuarine waters across the globe. All species region, from Noosa to the Qld/NSW border of seagrass are flowering plants (angiosperms). is a transition zone that includes both tropical They are not grasses in the true sense of the word and temperate species. However, in NSW and but are distantly related to lilies and gingers. Victoria the seagrass meadows are dominated Seagrasses have leaves and rhizomes – a type of by temperate species. Progressively more robust root that anchors the plants in sand or mud. sophisticated techniques in anatomy, biochemistry Fine roots, with hairs, emerge from the rhizomes and genetics have in recent times distinguished providing structural stability and providing for between similar looking species within these the uptake of nutrients. The leaves contain the families, but studies are underway to reduce chlorophyll necessary for the photosynthetic uncertainty, for example, with regard to the process, which uses light to turn carbon dioxide distribution of species in the genus Zostera and water into the complex molecules of growth. (Sainty et al. 2012, p. 127, p. 129, p. 131). Even though the flowers produce seeds, the main The five families contain at least 12 species with mechanism by which most species of seagrass different distributions (Table 3.3.1). Posidonia sustain and expand themselves is through their australis is the sole species within the family rhizomes. There are many reviews of the complex Posidoniaceae to be found along the southeast anatomical and physiological features of seagrasses coast (Other species within this genus occur along (e.g. Vermaat 2009). the southern and western coasts of Australia.). There are nearly 70 species of seagrass worldwide, Three species are within the family Zosteraceae: with some having restricted distributions but Zostera capricorni, Zostera muelleri and Zostera others occurring globally. Some species are found nigricaulis. The Hydrocharitaceae family includes in nearshore oceanic waters (bays and coastal Halophila australis, Halophila decipiens and lagoons) whereas others grow in estuaries, within Halophila ovalis. Within the Cymodoceaceae are habitats ranging from near marine channels to Halodule tridentata and Halodule univerus. brackish upstream locations. Three species belong to the Family Ruppiaceae: Seagrasses should not be confused with Ruppia maritima, Ruppia megacarpa and Ruppia macroalgae or “seaweeds” which are simple polycarpa. These are usually found in the upper plants with no root system or flowers. (The portions of estuaries where salinity is low. The excellent photos provided by Sainty et al. (2012) plants in this family have a distinctly different life readily distinguish seagrasses from macroalgae; history from other seagrasses – they have emergent other estuarine plants are also identified in this flowers that are pollinated in the air. For other valuable text.) seagrass species this reproductive function takes place under water. All seagrasses fall within the Order Alismatales, a large group of approximately 4,500 species with Some seagrasses, such as Posidonia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Global Seagrass Distribution and Diversity: a Bioregional Model ⁎ F
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 350 (2007) 3–20 www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Global seagrass distribution and diversity: A bioregional model ⁎ F. Short a, , T. Carruthers b, W. Dennison b, M. Waycott c a Department of Natural Resources, University of New Hampshire, Jackson Estuarine Laboratory, Durham, NH 03824, USA b Integration and Application Network, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, MD 21613, USA c School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, 4811 Queensland, Australia Received 1 February 2007; received in revised form 31 May 2007; accepted 4 June 2007 Abstract Seagrasses, marine flowering plants, are widely distributed along temperate and tropical coastlines of the world. Seagrasses have key ecological roles in coastal ecosystems and can form extensive meadows supporting high biodiversity. The global species diversity of seagrasses is low (b60 species), but species can have ranges that extend for thousands of kilometers of coastline. Seagrass bioregions are defined here, based on species assemblages, species distributional ranges, and tropical and temperate influences. Six global bioregions are presented: four temperate and two tropical. The temperate bioregions include the Temperate North Atlantic, the Temperate North Pacific, the Mediterranean, and the Temperate Southern Oceans. The Temperate North Atlantic has low seagrass diversity, the major species being Zostera marina, typically occurring in estuaries and lagoons. The Temperate North Pacific has high seagrass diversity with Zostera spp. in estuaries and lagoons as well as Phyllospadix spp. in the surf zone. The Mediterranean region has clear water with vast meadows of moderate diversity of both temperate and tropical seagrasses, dominated by deep-growing Posidonia oceanica.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Selection and Storage with Nano-Silver and Copper As
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Seed selection and storage with nano-silver and copper as potential antibacterial agents for the seagrass Zostera marina: implications for habitat restoration Shaochun Xu1,2,3, Yi Zhou1,2,4*, Shuai Xu1,2,3, Ruiting Gu1,2,3, Shidong Yue1,2,3, Yu Zhang1,2,3 & Xiaomei Zhang1,2,4 Globally, seagrass meadows are extremely important marine ecosystems that are disappearing at an alarming rate. Therefore, research into seagrass restoration has become increasingly important. Various strategies have been used in Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) restoration, including planting seeds. To improve the efciency of restoration by planting seeds, it is necessary to select high-quality seeds. In addition, a suitable antibacterial agent is necessary for wet storage of desiccation sensitive seeds to reduce or inhibit microorganism infection and seed decay. In the present study, an efcient method for selecting for high-quality eelgrass seeds using diferent specifc gravities of salt water was developed, and potential antibacterial agents (nano-silver and copper sulfate) for seed storage were assessed. The results showed that the highest proportion of intact seeds (72.91 ± 0.50%) was recorded at specifc gravities greater than 1.20. Therefore, specifc gravities greater than 1.20 can be used for selecting high-quality eelgrass seeds. During seed storage at 0 °C, the proportion of intact seeds after storage with nano-silver agent was over 90%, and also higher than 80% with copper sulfate agent, which was signifcantly higher than control treatments. The fndings revealed a potential selection method for high-quality seeds and long-term seed storage conditions for Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Karyotype Variations in Seagrass (Halodule Wrightii Ascherson￢ﾀﾔ
    Aquatic Botany 136 (2017) 52–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Aquatic Botany journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/aquabot Short communication Karyotype variations in seagrass (Halodule wrightii Ascherson—Cymodoceaceae) a b,∗ a Silmar Luiz da Silva , Karine Matos Magalhães , Reginaldo de Carvalho a Graduate Program in Botany—PPGB and Cytogenetic Plant Laboratory of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, CEP: 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil b Aquatic Ecosystems Laboratory of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, Dois Irmãos, CEP: 52171-900, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Karyotype variations in plants are common, but the results of cytological studies of some seagrasses Received 26 June 2015 remain unclear. The nature of the variation is not clearly understood, and the basic chromosomal num- Received in revised form 5 August 2016 ber has still not been established for the majority of the species. Here, we describe karyotype variations in Accepted 15 September 2016 the seagrass Halodule wrightii, and we suggest potentially causative mechanisms involving cytomixis and Available online 16 September 2016 B chromosomes. We prepared slides using the squashing technique followed by conventional Giemsa and C-banding, and silver nitrate and a CMA/DAPI staining. Based on intraspecific analysis, the diploid chromo- Keywords: some number of H. wrightii exhibited a variation from 2n = 24 to 2n = 39; 2n = 38 was the most frequent. In Cytomixis Seagrass general, we characterized the karyotype as an asymmetrical, semi-reticulated interphase nucleus with a chromosomally uniform condensation pattern.
    [Show full text]
  • Macrobrachium Intermedium in Southeastern Australia: Spatial Heterogeneity and the Effects of Species of Seagrass
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 75: 239-249, 1991 Published September 11 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Demographic patterns of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium in southeastern Australia: spatial heterogeneity and the effects of species of seagrass Charles A. Gray* School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, NSW. Australia ABSTRACT. The effects of species of seagrass (Zostera capricorni and Posidonia australis) on spatial and temporal heterogeneity in the demography of estuarine populations of the palaemonid prawn Macrobrachium intermedium across 65 km of the Sydney region, southeastern Australia, were examined. Three estuaries were sampled in 1983 and 1984 to assess the magnitude of intra- and inter- estuary variability in demographic characteristics among populations. Species of seagrass had no effect on the demographic patterns of populations: differences in the magnitude and directions of change in abundances, recruitment, reproductive characteristics, size structures and growth were as great among populations within each species of seagrass as those between the 2 seagrasses Abiotic factors, such as the location of a meadow in relation to depth of water and distance offshore, and the interactions of these factors with recruiting larvae are hypothesised to have greater influence than the species of seagrass in determining the distribution and abundance of these prawns. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in demography was similar across all spatial scales sampled: among meadows (50 m to 3 km apart) in an estuary and among meadows in all 3 estuaries (10 to 65 km apart). Variability in demographic processes among populations in the Sydney region was most likely due to stochastic factors extrinsic to the seagrasses then~selves.I conclude that the demography of seagrass-dwelling estuarine populations of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Morpho-Chronological Variations and Primary Production in Posidonia
    Morpho-chronological variations and primary production in Posidonia sea grass from Western Australia Gérard Pergent, Christine Pergent-Martini, Catherine Fernandez, Pasqualini Vanina, Diana Walker To cite this version: Gérard Pergent, Christine Pergent-Martini, Catherine Fernandez, Pasqualini Vanina, Diana Walker. Morpho-chronological variations and primary production in Posidonia sea grass from Western Aus- tralia. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, 2004, 84 (5), pp.895-899. 10.1017/S0025315404010161h. hal-01768985 HAL Id: hal-01768985 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01768985 Submitted on 17 Apr 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2004), 84, 895^899 Printed in the United Kingdom Morpho-chronological variations and primary production in Posidonia sea grass from Western Australia P Ge¤rard Pergent* , Christine Pergent-Martini*, Catherine Fernandez*, O Vanina Pasqualini* and Diana Walker O *Equipe Ecosyste' mes Littoraux, Faculty of Sciences,
    [Show full text]
  • The Sea-Grasses of Brazil Ligulate, Linear, Leaf-Tip
    Acta Bot. Need. October 512-516 21(5), 1972, p. The sea-grasses of Brazil C. den Hartog Rijksherbarium, Leiden There is still hardly anything known aboutthe occurrence of sea-grasses in South America. The number of records is extremely small. Therefore, one wonders whether these plants are extremely rare or absent along long stretches of coast, whether it is that have been overlooked or just they by botanists. It seems that the latterapplies to the coast of Brazil, from where up to nowonly two collections had been recorded (Setchell 1934; den Hartog 1970). Thanks to the active, gratefully acknowledged co-operation of Dr. Liliane Forneris (Universidade de Sao Paulo) I received a number of sea-grasses from several places along the Brazilian coast. I am also indebted to Dr. Emilia Santos (Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro) and Dr. Graziela M. Barroso (Jardim Botanico, Rio de Janeiro) for and sending me a specimen a photograph, respectively, of Halophila decipiens. Further, I am grateful to Dr. V. J. H. de Jilovice de Sternberg (Com- panhia ‘Algimar’, Rio de Janeiro) for his co-operation in obtaining material. At present there are 5 species now known from Brazil. KEY TO THE SEA-GRASSES OF BRAZIL 1. Leaves with 3 Tannin cells ligulate, linear, nerves. present. 2. Leaf-tip bicuspidate; leaves Va-l mm wide 1. Halodule wrightii obtuse with 2. Leaf-tip or emarginate, very faintly developed lateral teeth, or without such teeth; leaves wider than 1 mm. 3. Leaf-tip emarginate 2. Halodule emarginata 3. Leaf-tip obtuse 3. Halodule lilianeae 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Seagrass Habitats of Northeast Australia: Models of Key Processes and Controls
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 71(3): 1153–1169, 2002 SEAGRASS HABITATS OF NORTHEAST AUSTRALIA: MODELS OF KEY PROCESSES AND CONTROLS T. J. B. Carruthers, W. C. Dennison, B. J. Longstaff, M. Waycott, E. G. Abal, L. J. McKenzie and W. J. Lee Long ABSTRACT An extensive and diverse assemblage of seagrass habitats exists along the tropical and subtropical coastline of north east Australia and the associated Great Barrier Reef. In their natural state, these habitats are characterised by very low nutrient concentrations and are primarily nitrogen limited. Summer rainfall and tropical storms/cyclones lead to large flows of sediment-laden fresh water. Macro grazers, dugongs (Dugong dugon) and green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas) are an important feature in structuring tropical Aus- tralian seagrass communities. In general, all seagrass habitats in north east Australia are influenced by high disturbance and are both spatially and temporally variable. This pa- per classifies the diversity into four habitat types and proposes the main limiting factor for each habitat. The major processes that categorise each habitat are described and sig- nificant threats or gaps in understanding are identified. Four broad categories of seagrass habitat are defined as ‘River estuaries’, ‘Coastal’, ‘Deep water’ and ‘Reef’, and the domi- nant controlling factors are terrigenous runoff, physical disturbance, low light and low nutrients, respectively. Generic concepts of seagrass ecology and habitat function have often been found inappropriate to the diverse range of seagrass habitats in north east Australian waters. The classification and models developed here explain differences in habitats by identifying ecological functions and potential response to impacts in each habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemotyping the Lignin of Posidonia Seagrasses
    APL001 Analytical Pyrolysis Letters 1 Chemotyping the lignin of Posidonia seagrasses JOERI KAAL1,O SCAR SERRANO 2,J OSÉ CARLOS DEL RÍO3, AND JORGE RENCORET3 1Pyrolyscience, Santiago de Compostela, Spain 2Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia 3IRNAS, CSIC, Seville, Spain Compiled January 18, 2019 A recent paper in Organic Geochemistry entitled "Radi- cally different lignin composition in Posidonia species may link to differences in organic carbon sequestration capacity" discusses the remarkable difference in lignin chemistry between two kinds of “Neptune grass”, i.e. Posidonia oceanica and Posidonia australis. A recent paper in Organic Geochemistry entitled "Radically different lignin composition in Posidonia species may link to differences in organic carbon sequestration capacity" discusses the remarkable difference in lignin chemistry between two kinds of “Neptune grass”, i.e. Posidonia oceanica and Posidonia australis. Initial efforts using analytical pyrolysis techniques (Py-GC- MS and THM-GC-MS) showed that the endemic Mediterranean Fig. 1. Posidonia oceanica mat deposits in Portlligat (Western member of the Posidonia genus, P. oceanica, has abnormally Mediterranean). Photo: Kike Ballesteros high amounts of p-HBA (para-hydroxybenzoic acid) whereas the down-under variety does not. State-of-the-art lignin charac- terization in Seville (DFRC, 2D-NMR) showed that the p-HBA ranean high-carbon accumulator (see figure below), but it proba- is part of the lignin backbone, and not glycosylated as initially bly contains slightly more p-HBA than Posidonia australis. Posido- expected, and P. oceanica is now the producer of the most exten- nia sinuosa is not capable of producing big mat deposits neither, sively p-HBA-acylated lignin known in the Plant Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering and Seed Production in the Subtropical Seagrass, Halodule Wrightii (Shoal Grass)
    University of Texas Rio Grande Valley ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Biology Faculty Publications and Presentations College of Sciences 5-2016 Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrass, Halodule wrightii (shoal grass) Joseph L. Kowalski The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Hudson R. DeYoe The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.utrgv.edu/bio_fac Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kowalski, Joseph L. and DeYoe, Hudson R.. "Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrass, Halodule wrightii (shoal grass)" Botanica Marina, vol. 59, no. 2-3, 2016, pp. 193-199. https://doi.org/ 10.1515/bot-2015-0099 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Sciences at ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UTRGV. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DE GRUYTER Botanica Marina 2016; 59(2-3): 193–199 Short communication Joseph L. Kowalski* and Hudson R. DeYoe Flowering and seed production in the subtropical seagrass, Halodule wrightii (shoal grass) DOI 10.1515/bot-2015-0099 and Kowalski 2014). Halodule wrightii Ascherson (shoal Received 26 November, 2015; accepted 14 April, 2016; online first 25 grass) did not experience overall decline and remains an May, 2016 abundant and ecologically important seagrass that often grows in disturbed sediments (Pulich 1982). Reproduc- Abstract: Reproductive structures of the seagrass, tive structures of H. wrightii have been found from Brazil, Halodule wrightii Ascherson (shoal grass) are cryptic several localities along the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean and ephemeral, but were found on several occasions at Sea and the east coast of North America (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsors Sponsors Exhibitors
    SPONSORS SPONSORS EXHIBITORS ASFB Conference 22nd – 24th July, 2017 Page 1 INDEX Welcome to Albany ____________________________________________ 3 Welcome from ASFB ___________________________________________ 4 Delegate Information __________________________________________ 5 Invited Speakers _____________________________________________ 11 Program ___________________________________________________ 14 Poster Listing ________________________________________________ 32 Trade Directory ______________________________________________ 32 Notes ______________________________________________________ 35 ASFB Conference 22nd – 24th July, 2017 Page 2 WELCOME TO ALBANY On behalf of the local organising committee for the 2017 ASFB conference, I’d like to welcome you all to the beautiful coastal town of Albany on the south coast of Western Australia. Situated on the edge of Princess Royal Harbour and walking distance from the historic town centre, the Albany Entertainment Centre is a spectacular venue to host the first stand-alone ASFB conference since 2011. This has provided the organising committee with an opportunity to develop an exciting conference program that is a little bit ‘out of the ordinary’. With the overarching theme of ‘Turning Points in Fish and Fisheries’, we hope to get everyone thinking about all those influential moments or developments, small and big, that have changed the way we go about our research. After a few years of working hard to get both marine and freshwater contributions in as many sessions as possible, we are mixing (or rather un-mixing) it up for the Sunday, when two concurrent sessions will focus specifically on marine habitat-based topics and freshwater- related issues for the full day. I wish to thank everyone for making the effort to travel all the way to Albany for this conference. Thank you also to the local organising committee and to ASN for helping with the planning of the event and to our sponsors for their contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Halodule in Bermuda
    THE SEAGRASS HALODULE IN BERMUDA J.M. Bilewitch1, K.A. Coates1, S.A. Manuel1, J.W. Fourqurean2, W.J. Kenworthy3 1DEPT OF CONSERVATION SERVICES, BDA; 2FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIV, MIAMI, USA; 3NOAA, BEAUFORT, NC USA Introduction Results Comprehensive benthic surveys done between 2006 and 2009 show that Halodule in The seagrass Halodule bermudensis den Hartog 1964 was described as an endemic Bermuda is a widespread, shallow-water organism found both inshore and at offshore Bermudian species. (See type location in Fig. 4) reef-associated sites (Figs 4 & 5). When sediment conditions and light levels are adequate for supporting seagrass beds, the density of Halodule in the beds is probably controlled by nutrient availability. Species Halodule sp Common name shoal grass Maximum 12.5 m depth Light 25-65% requirement (median 50%) Prevalence common (11.1%) flowers in May- Reproduction July; female only Fig. 1. Leaf tips (above) and original specimen (right) Fig. 4. Present distribution of Halodule in of H. bermudensis. Scale for tips = 1 mm. Bermuda; sample locations for genetic and leaf tip material ↓; and type location for H. Fig. 5. Ecology of Halodule in Bermuda. However, specimens of Halodule collected in Bermuda are more frequently referred to bermudensis Halodule wrightii Ascherson. The taxonomic question of “what is H. wrightii?” is complicated by such things as the presence of two very distinct forms of Halodule on the herbarium All leaf tips examined had a distinct mid-projection and two small lateral teeth; blade width sheets of the type material. Den Hartog (1964), among others, recognized that the original about 1 to 1.4 mm (Figs 6 & 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropogenic Impacts on Waituna Lagoon: Reconstructing The
    i Anthropogenic impacts on Waituna Lagoon: Reconstructing the environmental history Sarai Cosgrove 2011 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for a Master of Science degree in Ecology at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand ii iii Abstract Waituna Lagoon is a shallow temperate coastal lagoon in Southland, New Zealand. The 1,350 hectare Waituna Lagoon and associated wetland system is of national and international importance for its unique ecology and the cultural values placed upon it. Waituna is opened to the sea ca. 1-2 times annually, during which time it becomes estuarine. This opening regime has been artificially managed since 1908, with an unknown impact on the lagoon. Since 2007, Waituna appears to have experienced rapid degradation and eutrophication, possibly due to intensification of farming in its catchment. It has rare, extensive beds of the seagrasses Ruppia megacarpa and Ruppia polycarpa, which have been lost from many similar systems due to eutrophication and sedimentation. Waituna Lagoon is currently under active management to preserve its unique ecology, and its restoration to a more natural state is being considered. This study aims to reconstruct Waituna Lagoon’s natural opening regime and Ruppia dynamics, as understanding the natural ecosystem is important for restoration. The hypotheses are: (1) that under a natural opening regime, environmental variations within Waituna Lagoon were less frequent but more extreme; (2) that Ruppia was not present in Waituna Lagoon under a natural opening regime; and (3) that Ruppia was not dominant in Waituna Lagoon under a natural opening regime. Three push cores (130, 83 and 64 cm length) were collected from the sheltered Shand Bay and from the wind-exposed, deepest site in the main lagoon.
    [Show full text]