DOCSLIB.ORG

Refugee Status Determination, Narrative and the Oral Hearing in Australia and Canada

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Refugee Status Determination, Narrative and the Oral Hearing in Australia and Canada REFUGEE STATUS DETERMINATION, NARRATIVE AND THE ORAL HEARING IN AUSTRALIA AND CANADA by ANTHEA FAY VOGL B.A., University of Sydney, 2007 LL.B., University of Sydney, 2007 LL.M., McGill, 2011 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Law) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2016 © Anthea Fay Vogl, 2016 Refugee Status Determination, Narrative and the Oral Hearing in Australia and Canada Anthea Fay Vogl A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Law University of Technology Sydney University of British Columbia 2015 CERTIFICATE OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP I certify that the work in this thesis has not previously been submitted for a degree nor has it been submitted as part of requirements for a degree except as fully acknowledged within the text. I also certify that the thesis has been written by me. Any help that I have received in my research work and the preparation of the thesis itself has been acknowledged. In addition, I certify that all information sources and literature used are indicated in the thesis. Signature of Student: Date: 11 November, 2015 iii Acknowledgements While the tangible work of this thesis is represented in the pages that follow, my research has stretched far beyond these chapters. My work here reflects the support of many people and relationships, both old and new, for which I am very grateful. I have had the privilege of the most generous and thoughtful supervision from Jenni Millbank, Catherine Dauvergne and Honni van Rijswijk. To Jenni, thank you for your input and insight into this thesis (and beyond it) at every turn. Your devoted, wise and impossibly organised supervision have been sources of intellectual challenge, encouragement, and very frequently, relief. For this, Malaysian refuels and a steady stream of new, celluloid friends to meet in my thesis breaks, I am grateful. To Catherine, I am so glad I ventured across the Pacific to work with you, and make UBC and Vancouver a part of this project. Thank you for your constant and thoughtful engagement with all aspects of my research and for knowing the best way through all kinds of dilemmas. It has been such a pleasure to learn from and work with you. To Honni, thank you for such meticulous and thoughtful feedback, for many wonderful leads on books and research and for your encouragement throughout. This project was possible because of the asylum seekers who allowed me to observe their hearings. I am grateful for their openness to my research and participation, even as they negotiated one of the most difficult moments in their applications for the right to remain safely in Australia or Canada. I also want to thank the lawyers, advocates and organisations who so generously facilitated my fieldwork and supported this project, especially UNHCR Canada, my Australian ‘research partner’ organisation, and individual lawyers and advocates in Australia and Canada. The exigencies and timelines of day-to-day work in refugee advocacy rarely make incorporating academic research projects easy or convenient. I appreciate both the fortitude and the patience involved. I am very thankful to the Faculty of Law at UTS and my colleagues there, for providing such a supportive environment from which to teach and research. I am grateful to the UBC Faculty of Law and the many people who welcomed me so generously in the year I made Vancouver my home: Sarah Marsden, a most judicious guide to all things Vancouver and who kindly helped facilitate the Canadian aspects of my research, Susan Bazilli, Douglas Harris and Joanne Chung as well as Roozbeh Kianpoor, Maree Fields and Risha Premarajah. My warmest thanks to David Carter, Elyse Methven, Alecia Simmonds, Claire Pettigrew, Miriam Thompson, Huon Curtis, Jemima Mowbray and Min Dark who have read versions of these chapters, provided thoughtful feedback and constantly engaged with this project as it has come together. I am especially thankful to those who ‘went before’ and provided advice, encouragement and support in navigating this PhD business, and to those who have ‘come with,’ especially David and Elyse, who have been the finest and best-humoured company throughout. I also thank Margy Thomas Horton, who provided professional editing assistance. A doctoral thesis is a labour of love (and often some other emotions). Many wonderful friendships have sustained me throughout this time: to Claire P, Mark, Dave, Miriam, Alecia and Huon, thank you. I also thank my family, Shahla, Edward and Martin for their support and care. And finally to Claire Van Vuuren, for the love, the wisest advice and for unfaltering patience and understanding. It is difficult adequately express my gratitude, but I trust the first ‘thesis free’ day will be a good way to start. iv Preface This dissertation is formatted in accordance with the regulations of the University of Technology, Sydney and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a PhD degree awarded jointly by the University of Technology, Sydney and the University of British Columbia. Versions of this dissertation will exist in the institutional repositories of both institutions. The refugee applicant oral hearings addressed in Chapters Four to Seven were covered by University of British Columbia Behavioural Research Ethics Board, Approval Certificate No H12-01565; and University of Technology Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee, Ethics Reference No 2011-486A. v Table of Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................1 Theory, Method and Data ...................................................................................................5 The Refugee Convention and the Political Context of Seeking Asylum in Australia and Canada...........................................................................................................................9 Locating the Thesis: RSD, Testimony and Credibility Assessment ..............................14 Thesis Overview and Chapter Summary.........................................................................26 Notes on the Nature of Refugee Testimony and the Presentation of the Hearings in this Thesis............................................................................................................................29 CHAPTER ONE. THE THEORETICAL FRAME: LAW, LITERATURE AND NARRATIVE .............................................................................................................34 Introduction........................................................................................................................34 Part One. On Law and Literature....................................................................................36 Part Two. Law, Literature and Narrative: A Critical Interdisciplinary Approach....40 i. Critiquing the Separation of Law from Literature and Narrative..............................41 ii. Refusing Sentimental and Instrumentalising Approaches to Literature ..................44 Part Three. Narrative as Methodology for Assessing Refugee Testimony ...................51 i. Finding a Critical, Working Definition of Narrative ................................................54 Conclusion...........................................................................................................................57 CHAPTER TWO. RESEARCH METHODS AND DESIGN ...............................59 Introduction........................................................................................................................59 Part One. The Dataset .......................................................................................................62 i. Recruitment and Criteria for Inclusion .....................................................................67 ii. Multiple Forms of Data............................................................................................69 Part Two. Qualitative Methods of Observation and Analysis .......................................70 i. Methods of Observation............................................................................................70 ii. Methods of Analysis ................................................................................................72 Part Three. Limitations of the Thesis’s Method and Analysis ......................................73 i. Limitations of the Non-random Dataset and Hearing Selection Process..................74 ii. Limitations of the Role of Researcher and of Refugee Applicant Testimony .........75 Part Four. The Dataset in Context: Access to Refugee Hearing Data and Silence......77 Conclusion...........................................................................................................................83 CHAPTER THREE. A HISTORY OF THE ORAL HEARING IN RSD IN AUSTRALIA AND CANADA: HOW DID WE GET HERE?..............................85 Introduction........................................................................................................................85 Part One. Refugee Determination and the Oral Hearing in Australia .........................87 i. Determining Status in the Early Days: The Determination of Refugee Status Committee .......................................................................................................................93 ii. Orality and the Emergence of the RSD Oral Hearing..............................................97 Part
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Achron Coverspring04final2
    ACORN Chronicle PUBLISHED BY THE JEAN AND ALEXANDER HEARD LIBRARY • VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY • SPRING 2008 Be Brilliant! WithDiscoverLibrary (The Heard Library’s versatile new research platform) FROM the University Librarian New Chancellor Zeppos Describes inding the right answer to a specific ques- DiscoverLibrary is in no way a finished prod- Ftion in today’s infinite ocean of Internet uct, but even in its first generation is far more pow- information is the most challenging part of erful than Acorn, the search interface used by the Library’s Future to Heard Society research. Our students rely more and more on Google library since 1996. DiscoverLibrary allows one to to find answers to their questions. But Google does refine a search in many ways, uses relevance ranking B Y L EW H ARRIS not lead you to the high value information available to arrange the results, and includes many resources in the Library, nor does it provide seamless access to Acorn never offered. It also aims to provide the short- eard Society members received a special treat in the ian will be made easier by the manner in which Gherman has NEIL BRAKE form of an update on the Vanderbilt Library’s bright transformed the library from a more traditional library to the other resources. So, more than a year ago, we set out est route between discovering a resource and getting H future from Chancellor Nicholas S. Zeppos just three digital library of the future. with a commercial development partner to create a to it.If the resource is an online full-text article,for Paul M.Gherman days after he had been elected to the university’s top post by “We are positioned very well because of Paul,” he said.
    [Show full text]
  • MLA Chicago 2007
    MLA CHIcaGO 2007 The Humanities at Work in the World is the theme for this year’s Presidential Forum at the MLA Annual Convention. The theme will serve as the topic for the forum and two conversations growing directly out of it and as the subject of several other meetings. Two dozen or so related programs, sponsored by a broad spectrum of divisions, discussion groups, and allied and affiliated organizations, will participate. Each of these sessions will explore the ineluctability of techniques and approaches derived from the humanities as they inspire and enable work across a vast horizon of unexpected disciplines. Some of the most creative minds in our field—and in other professions as well—will reveal often unperceived connections between the work of the world and the work of the humanities. I think it will be an exciting as well as useful program and hope you will be able to join the dialogue in Chicago. —Michael Holquist The following is a list of forums, workshops, and sessions on The Humanities at Work in the World. forums Thursday, 27 December 87. The Humanities at Work in the World 7:00–8:45 p.m., Sheraton V, Sheraton Chicago The Presidential Forum. Presiding: Michael Holquist, Yale Univ. 1. “The Humanities as an Export Commodity,” Peter Brooks, Yale Univ. 2. “Deep Memory and National History Textbooks,” James V. Wertsch, Washington Univ. 3. “Stepping Out: On Making the Loathly Lady,” Wendy Steiner, Univ. of Pennsylvania 4. “The Humanities in the Twenty-First Century,” Richard J. Franke, Chicago Humanities Festival 5. “Good to Think With,” Marjorie Garber, Harvard Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • The Responsibility of Intellectuals
    The Responsibility of Intellectuals EthicsTheCanada Responsibility and in the FrameAesthetics ofofCopyright, TranslationIntellectuals Collections and the Image of Canada, 1895– 1924 ExploringReflections the by Work Noam of ChomskyAtxaga, Kundera and others and Semprún after 50 years HarrietPhilip J. Hatfield Hulme Edited by Nicholas Allott, Chris Knight and Neil Smith 00-UCL_ETHICS&AESTHETICS_i-278.indd9781787353008_Canada-in-the-Frame_pi-208.indd 3 3 11-Jun-1819/10/2018 4:56:18 09:50PM First published in 2019 by UCL Press University College London Gower Street London WC1E 6BT Available to download free: www.ucl.ac.uk/ucl-press Text © Contributors, 2019 Images © Copyright holders named in captions, 2019 The authors have asserted their rights under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 to be identified as authors of this work. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library. This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Non-derivative 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the work for personal and non-commercial use providing author and publisher attribution is clearly stated. Attribution should include the following information: Allott, N., Knight, C. and Smith, N. (eds). The Responsibility of Intellectuals: Reflections by Noam Chomsky and others after 50 years. London: UCL Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.14324/ 111.9781787355514 Further details about CC BY licenses are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Any third-party material in this book is published under the book’s Creative Commons license unless indicated otherwise in the credit line to the material.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Robert F. Barsky, 3386 Old Franklin Road
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Robert F. Barsky, 3386 Old Franklin Road, Cane Ridge, TN 37013 Departments and Programs: Vanderbilt University Law School and the Department of French & Italian, with joint appointments in the Max Kade Center for European Studies and German Studies; the Department of English and the Jewish Studies Program. Education: 1994-1996: Post Doctoral Studies: European Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Institute of Philosophy, Free University of Brussels. Director: Professor Michel Meyer. Research on legal argumentation, rhetoric, and the narratives of law and literature. 1992-1994: Post Doctoral Studies: University of Québec in Montréal. Director: Professor Marc Angenot. Research in discourse analysis theory pertaining to discourses in literature and law. 1987-1992: PhD in Comparative Literature, McGill University, Montréal. Director: Professor George Szanto. Thesis title: “Constructing through Discourse a Productive Other: Discourse Theory and the Convention refugee Hearing”. 1985-1987: Master’s of Arts in English Literature, McGill University, Montréal. 1981-1984: Bachelor of Arts in English and American Literature, Brandeis University, Boston. 1978-1980: D.E.C. in Social Sciences, Vanier College (CEGEP). 1973-78: Riverdale High School, Montréal. Distinctions and Honors Rockefeller Bellagio Writing Residency, Bellagio, Italy, March-April 2018. Center for Teaching Senior Faculty Fellow, Center for Teaching, Vanderbilt University. 2016: Undocumented Immigrants in an Era of Arbitrary Law, nominated for: The Hart Socio-Legal Book Prize - A book prize for the most outstanding piece of socio- legal scholarship published in the 12 months. Summer 2016, Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Edinburgh, Visiting Research Fellow. 1 2012-13, Dutch Royal Academy Visiting Professor Award, Migration and Diversity Research Group, Free University of Amsterdam Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CV: Robert F. Barsky Robert F. Barsky, Canada Research Chair: Law, Narrative and Border Crossing, Vanderbilt University Departments and Programs: Department of French & Italian, with joint appointments in Vanderbilt University Law School; the Max Kade Center for European Studies and German Studies; the Department of English and the Jewish Studies Program. Founding Director: Québec and Canadian Studies, Vanderbilt University; Director, W. T. Bandy Center for Modernist Studies; Director of Graduate Studies, French and Italian. Education: 1994-1996: Post-Doctoral Studies: European Centre for the Study of Argumentation, Institute of Philosophy, Free University of Brussels. Director: Professor Michel Meyer. Research on legal argumentation, rhetoric, and the narratives of law and literature. 1992-1994: Post-Doctoral Studies: University of Québec in Montréal. Director: Professor Marc Angenot. Research in discourse analysis theory pertaining to discourses in literature and law. 1987-1992: PhD in Comparative Literature, McGill University, Montréal. Director: Professor George Szanto. Thesis title: “Constructing through Discourse a Productive Other: Discourse Theory and the Convention refugee Hearing”. 1985-1987: Masters of Arts in English Literature, McGill University, Montréal. 1981-1984: Bachelor of Arts in English and American Literature, Brandeis University, Boston. 1978-1980: D.E.C. in Social Sciences, Vanier College (CEGEP). 1973-78: Riverdale High School, Montréal. Distinctions and Honors SSHRC Insight Grant for: From the 1965 Bellagio Colloquium to the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees: Negotiations, Historical Context, and Travaux Préparatoires. $279,750. 1 CV: Robert F. Barsky Canada Research Chair Tier 1: Law, Narrative and Border Crossing (SSHRC award, totaling $2,800,000 over 14 years) March-April, 2018: Rockefeller Bellagio Writing Residency, Bellagio, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • The 10Th Anniversary of the Killam Fellowships
    Summer 2012 Foundation for Educational Exchange Between Canada and the United States of America A message from The 10th Anniversary of the CEO Michael Hawes Killam Fellowships Program Fulbright Canada is proud to boast an active and engaged alumni who are leaders in their In 2002, Fulbright Canada partnered with at Vanderbilt fields, champions of social action, the American Killam Trust to create an University, Barsky and proponents of diversity. They undergraduate exchange program that teaches literature remain committed to the core supported some of the best and brightest and works in Fulbright mission; promoting young minds in Canada and the United immigration mutual understanding at home States. This year, on the 10th anniversary, 250 studies, linguistics, and abroad. students will have participated in the Killam and radicalism Fellowships Program! in American In this newsletter we invite all of Jewish life. While you to read about the community To celebrate, Fulbright Canada is inviting many best known for and volunteer initiatives that of its key stakeholders (alumni, government his work as the our alumni have undertaken. We partners, and universities) to our 10th biographer of are proud of this opportunity to anniversary celebration. We are hosting famed linguist relay their stories of engagement, Guest lecturer the 10th Annual Elizabeth Killam Rodgers & and activist Noam collaboration and understanding. Dr. Robert Barsky Constance Killam Distinguished Public Lecture, Chomsky, Barsky is We also invite you to read about and a gala dinner at the Chateau Laurier in an important public intellectual in his own our various community leadership th Ottawa on September 13 .
    [Show full text]
  • Robert F. Barsky “You Cannot Transform the History of Ideas Into A
    02.barsky 11/10/04 12:09 PM Page 183 Robert F.Barsky “You Cannot Transform the History of Ideas Into a Comic Strip”: An Interview with Marc Angenot I spoke with Marc Angenot during a visit he made to the University of Western On- tario, Canada, in .The interview lasted almost two hours, and has been edited for clarity. —Robert Barsky Robert Barsky: Your work has not been engaged by the community of literary and historical scholars in the United States. There have been the usual intellectual fads, and concomitant intellectual roadblocks along the way, but for some reason your work, your approach, hasn’t quite entered the debate. Why is this? Marc Angenot: There have been a number of ongoing fads for conti- nental French-speaking thinkers, philosophers, and theoreticians, but to a certain degree all these fads seem worn out, or are vanishing away. I don’t mind much. It’s very hard to find out how and when and why in a given intellectual milieu some kind of thinking or paradigm be- comes fashionable or suddenly looks interesting to a group of people. We must assume that the component of misunderstanding is usually much more important than the actual relevance of what is being un- derstood.When there are different sets of expectations, different issues, and different stakes, there is clearly a better chance for one to be mis- understood. So I really don’t mind much. I’m not too interested in creative misunderstandings. RB: Is one of the obstacles to understanding the overall corpus of your work the fact that you are primarily a historian who teaches in a lit- erature department? Or does the problem extend elsewhere, since your work in history is deeply informed by discourse analysis and dis- course theory? One way or the other, your work doesn’t fit easily into any of the traditional disciplines as the university defines them.
    [Show full text]