On the Subject of God
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Click here for Full Issue of Fidelio Volume 2, Number 1, Spring 1993 This issue is not the simple assertion, whether God exists, or not; the immediate question is a fa r more modest undertakinn: By what means might human beings have the capability to know with certainty whether God exists? What aspect of human intelligence might bear upon such a special quality of knowledge? What relevant fo rm of scientific incompetence, commonplace among academicians, has Dawkins exhibited? The Metropolitan Museum of Art,Purchased with special funds and gifts of friends of the Musuem, 1961 . (61 .198) Rembrandt van Rijn, "A ristotle with a Bust of Homer, " 1653. 16 © 1993 Schiller Institute, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission strictly prohibited. On the Subject of God by LyndonH. laRouche,Jr. July, 1992 ccording to the daily London Independent of the rhetoric; this should be a crucial included point to be most recent April 16, the preceding evening's submitted in refuting him. Thirdly, the best available Aparticipants in an Edinburgh (Scotland) interna argument, which G6del should have been able to offer, tional science fe stival had heard an Oxford University but apparently did not, the Classical argument restated 4 professor of biology describe belief in God as a disorder from the standpoint of Cantor's Beitriige, deserves to be of the brain analogous explicitly to a transmittable "com presented as a supplement to the Classical proofs by puter virus." Oxford's Richard Dawkins' address had Plato and Leibniz. included the fo rmulation: "These are arbitrary, heredi The fo rmal question begged, in speaking of such an tary beliefs which people are told at a critical age, passed ontological proof, is not the issue as posed so ineptly by on from your parents rather like a virus." He had added: Dawkins. The issue is not the simple assertion, whether "that 'evolutionary theory' has removed any scientific God exists, or not; the immediate question is a fa r more basis fo r arguing the existence of God, and said that modest undertaking: by what means might human beings people who believe in a God who is responsible fo r the have the capability to know with certainty whether God ex 1 order and beauty of the universe are 'stupid.' ,, ists? More precisely, what aspect of human intelligence might Report of Dawkins' address was relayed to the present bear upon such a special quality of knowledge? Also to the writer by Charles B. Stevens of 21st Century Science point is: what relevantfo rm of scientificincompetence, com quarterly. Stevens suggested, that several persons, whom monplace among academicians, has Dawkins exhibited? he listed at that time, co-sponsor the submission of a For Plato, to whom we owe the original ontological rebuttal of Dawkins to the Independent, to consist essen proof, as fo r the present writer, human knowledge per tially of a 1960's ontological proof of the existence of taining to the existence of God is to be discovered, God authored by Princeton University's late Professor uniquely, within a correct grasp of the notion of "Pla 2 5 Kurt G6del. tonic ideas" (eide). The Christian Platonist, Gottfried At first glance, that suggested rebuttal was particu Leibniz, employed the term monad as a referent fo r such 6 larly relevant, since the choice of fo rmulation reported ideas. To the same purpose, Bernhard Riemann once 7 by the Independent might imply to a knowledgeable employed the term Geistesmassen. These terms, and this reader that Dawkins had intended to single out G6del's writer's term, "thought-objects," are each and all related 1961 ontological proof fo r attack. Nonetheless, G6del's in an essential way to (Christian Platonist) Georg Can 8 work appeared to be inadequate rebuttal on three counts. tor's 1890's conception of transfinite types. In these fo l Firstly, presently available versions of G6del's proof add lowing pages, we shall summarize the kernel of the nothing significant to the Classical argument by Plato proof, that the conception of a Judeo-Christian God occurs 3 and Leibniz. Secondly, it would be disingenuous not as a matter of human knowledge only in the fo rm of a to attack directly the shameless illiteracy of Dawkins' "Platonic idea," or "thought-object." 17 fines a new theorem-lattice, "B, " associated with a new 12 I. set ofaxioms and postulates. That transformation, from A to B typifiesa rudimentary definition of "scientificand The Definition of technological progress." '" 'Human Knowled e' As we have shown in various other locations, no g theorem of lattice A can be consistent with any theorem That quality which sets the human species above, and of B; an "unbridgeable" chasm of fo rmal discontinuity apart from all lower species, is empirically reflected most separates mutually each lattice from all other lattices of simply, but nonetheless crucially, in all that pertains to such a series. That "chasm" corresponds, as does a map the simple fa ct, that mankind has risen, by successive to a terrain, to that action of change by means of which advances, above the miserable potential population-den B, fo r example, is generated from A. The series A, B, C, sity of a baboon-, or yahoo-like "primitive hunting and D, E, ... , is generated as a series by a higher fa ctor of gathering" culture, to a population-density of a thou change. This higher order of change, orders the suc sandfold greater today. This successful transformation cession of individual changes AB, BC, CD, DE, has occurred without a change in the present-day human etc., as a series. This higher change cannot be repre genotype, but, nonetheless, a succession of changes to an sented by any fo rmal algebraic or similar representa effect which is paralleled in the animal kingdom only tion of an ordered fu nction-since each and every by means of evolution from inferior to superior species. term of the series A, B, C, D, E, ..., is separated from In mankind, this achievement occurs through upward all others by an "unbridgeable" fo rmal discontinuity. transformations in quality of culture, a transformation Yet, this higher fa ctor of change defines in its own effected uniquely by means of an agency termed "cre way the effective generation of successive increases in ative reason." potential population-density, increases on which succes To restate this: the notion of "human knowledge" is sion the continued existence of that society ultimately so defined, as the ordering of progress, from inferior, to depends. superior fo rms of culture, a progress effected by that A detour is needed at this point; an example of the agency of change which we term human creative reason. change from lattice A to B must be supplied. For this The difficulty which impairs fa tally the argument of purpose, the reader is referred to Nicolaus of Cusa's a Richard Dawkins from the outset, and many other 1430's discovery of the isoperimetric principle, as the putatively educated illiterates voicing conceits like his relevant fe atures of that discovery are emphasized in this 14 own, is the fa ct, that no fo rmal system of deduction! present writer's "On the Subject of Metaphor.,, Briefly, induction could portray positively such progress in hu the highlights most relevant to the ontological proof are 9 man knowledge. That difficulty can be located in the the fo llowing. fo llowing terms of reference. IO To estimate the area of a square which is equal to the The central fe ature of a process of successive increases area of a given (e.g., "unit") circle, use some fo rm of the in a society's population or potential population-density, fo llowing algorithm. Construct two squares by means of is scientificand technological progress. I I From the stand a single, continuous construction, one inscribed within point of fo rmal systems of argument, the level of scien the given circle, the other circumscribing it. Repeatedly, tificknowledge (technology) of a society at a given time double the number of sides of this pair of polygons, to may be represented, approximately, by a mutually consis generate a series of paired regular polygons of 2" sides, tent open-ended set of theorems. This set of theorems is fr om n = 1 6 to an astronomical n = 256. The average of implicitly consistent with some underlying set of interde the areas of the two polygons will approximate the size pendent axioms and postulates. This arrangement is of a given circle, and the average of the perimeters termed a "theorem-lattice," and the associated, underly of the polygons that circle's perimeter. That perimeter ing set of interdependent axioms and postulates is some divided by the length of the diagonal of the inscribed times termed an "hereditary principle." Let one such polygon yields an approximate value fo r 7T;the estimated theorem-lattice be represented by "A." Let this A be area divided by the square of half that diameter, is also associated with a specific potential population-density an approximation of 7T. fo r that society. Let a fu ndamental discovery, overturn However, even if n is increased astronomically, as fo r ing some part of the interdependent set of axioms and the cases that n = 256 or much more, a well-defined, postulates of A, be correlated with an increase of that discrete difference in area and perimeters persists be society's potential population-density. This change de- tween the circle and each of the polygons. The perimeter 18 of the polygons never converges upon congruence with that rior, initial lattice A, could never become coincident ' of the circle.