DOCSLIB.ORG

Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Joint Protocol between The Immigration Service and The Police Service for the Removal of Immigration Offenders 19 July 2001 Contents JointJoint Joint ProtocolJoint P rotoco l Joint Protocol BetweenJoint Protocol Between Joint Protocol Between theJoint Protocol Between the Joint Protocol Between the ImmigrationJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Joint Protocol Between the Immigration ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service andJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and theJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the PoliceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Service Introduction ................................................................ 3 1 1.1 Preamble ..................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Aims ........................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Core Principles ........................................................................................... 3 Background ................................................................. 5 2 Joint Operational Agreement ...................................... 6 3 3.1 Agenda for shifting resources ..................................................................... 6 3.2 Measuri ng Success ....................................................................................... 7 Organisation ............................................................... 8 4 4.1 Resources .................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Meeting the Costs of Resourcing .............................................................. 10 4.3 Tasking for Operations ............................................................................ 10 4.4 Custody Capability .................................................................................. 10 4.5 Communication: Immigration Service and Police Service ....................... 11 4.6 Communication: Media Strategy .............................................................. 11 4.7 Complaints procedures ............................................................................. 12 Immigration Service Levels of Operation ................. 13 5 5.1 Lower-Tier Operations ............................................................................ 13 5.2 Upper-Tier Operations ............................................................................. 13 5.3 Middle-Tier Operations ............................................................................ 14 Next Steps ................................................................. 15 6 6.1 Action by Immigration Service and Police Service .................................. 15 6.2 Point of contact ........................................................................................ 15 Review of protocol .................................................... 16 7 Annex A - Risk Assessment Authorisation ................ 17 8 Annex B - Priority Areas for Activity ....................... 18 9 19 July 2001 2 JointJoint Joint ProtocolJoint P rotoco l Joint Protocol BetweenJoint Protocol Between Joint Protocol Between theJoint Protocol Between the Joint Protocol Between the ImmigrationJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Joint Protocol Between the Immigration ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service andJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and theJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the PoliceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Service Introduction 1 Preamble 1.1 This protocol is the outcome of high level discussion betw een Home O ffice, Immigration Service and Police Service representatives to address joint issues arising from challenging Government targets for the removal of failed asylum seekers. It should be regarded as the first stage in developing an integrated and long term working arrangement between the two organisations to meet removal targets. It is recognised by both organisations that this protocol is an initial framework for action and that not every eventuality will be covered. The protocol is dynamic and initially will be subject to quarterly reviews. The reviews w ill take into account practical experience within the joint operating environment. Th e Gover nment message i s clear; that w e must achieve a much higher rate of removal s, if we are to deliver an effective asylum and immigration system. It is in this context that the protocol has been agreed: Such is the scale and nature of the task that co-operation will be essential to achieve the aims set out below. Aims 1.2 v To establish the mechanism by which the Police Service will assist and support the Immigration Service to meet annual government targets for the removal of im mi grati on offenders, w ith particul ar regard to fai led asy lum seekers. v To develop the expertise of the Immigration Service in the arrest of immigration offenders without the support of Police, whilst ensuring the safety of immigration officers. v To achieve the aims in a manner that maintains and increases the trust and confidence of the publi c, and par ticul arly members of ethnic communities. Core Principles 1.3 1. The Immigration Service will retain primacy for the operational development and im plementati on of pl ans to identify and remove i mm igration offenders. 2. The Police Service will commit to support the Immigration Service in meeting the Government s target for the removal of immigration offenders, w ith particular regard to failed asy lum seekers. 3. The Immigration Service will retain full responsibility and liability for the decision making process to identify offenders for removal. 4. The Police Service will retain primacy for maintaining and increasing the confidence of minority communities, and promoting community safety. 19 July 2001 3 JointJoint Joint ProtocolJoint P rotoco l Joint Protocol BetweenJoint Protocol Between Joint Protocol Between theJoint Protocol Between the Joint Protocol Between the ImmigrationJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Joint Protocol Between the Immigration ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service andJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and theJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the PoliceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Service 5. The implementation of the plans will not detr act the Police Service from their published pri orities. 6. The Police Service will retain the right of authority and authorisation for immigration activity in light of their duty of care to the community. 7. The Police Service will provide an agreed level of support for Immigration Service operations, unless reasonable grounds can be shown. 8. Operations will be based on confirmed intelligence and executed in consideration of joint assured Risk A ssessment. T hey will meet the provisions and principles enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998 and Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000. 9. This protocol only applies to Immigration Officers enforcement activity and will not impinge upon other aspects of activity where the Immigration Service and Police Service have existing effective joint working. 19 July 2001 4 JointJoint Joint ProtocolJoint P rotoco l Joint Protocol BetweenJoint Protocol Between Joint Protocol Between theJoint Protocol Between the Joint Protocol Between the ImmigrationJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Joint Protocol Between the Immigration ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service andJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and theJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the PoliceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Joint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police ServiceJoint Protocol Between the Immigration Service and the Police Service Background 2 Police have traditionally assisted Immigration Officers in the execution of their duty to detect and identify immigration offenders. Limitations in legislation have practically restricted the powers of ar rest to poli ce offi cers. Since the mid-1980s there has been a sharp increase in the number of people claiming asy lum. Incr ease i n demand is star ting t o impinge di sproportionatel y on pol ice resources, particularly in light of the clarity of published ministerial and police priorities set in consultation with the public. The Macpherson Report enhances police understanding of the public perception of their treatment of ethnic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Avon and Somerset, Policing in Austerity: One Year On
    Policing in austerity: One year on Avon and Somerset Constabulary July 2012 ISBN: 978-1-84987-857-9 Contents About this review 3 Summary 4 Money – meeting the savings 6 What is the financial challenge in Avon and Somerset Constabulary? 6 People – reconfiguring the workforce 7 What is the impact on the workforce? 7 What is the effect on the front line? 8 Number and proportion of officers, PCSOs and staff in frontline roles 8 Number and proportion of police officers in frontline roles 9 Public – reviewing the services you receive 10 What proportion of police officers and police community support officers are visible and available to the public? 10 How is the way you can access policing services changing? 10 Has there been any change in crime levels over the last year? 11 Does the force’s own survey work show any change in public satisfaction with the service they provide? 12 Policing in austerity: One year on – Avon and Somerset Constabulary © HMIC 2012 2 About this review In October 2010, the Government announced that the central funding provided to the police service would reduce by 20% in the four years between March 2011 and March 2015. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) carried out an inspection of all 43 police forces in England and Wales in Spring 2011, to see how they were planning to meet this financial challenge. When the results were published in July 2011 (search for ‘Valuing the Police’ on www.hmic.gov.uk), we committed to returning one year later to report on progress, and to assess whether there had been any impact on the service provided to the public.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGH LEVEL FRAUD Before Becoming the Police and Crime
    HIGH LEVEL FRAUD Before becoming the Police and Crime Commissioner for the Thames Valley, one of the UK’s largest police forces, I had served worldwide as an Army Officer, worked in intelligence and been a Managing Director of an aircraft manufacturing company with aircraft in 120 countries. I did not expect that as a PCC much would shock me, I was wrong. The scale of corruption within at least four major UK banks, aided and abetted by their legal advisors, auditors and accountants has been on a massive scale. Fraud is usually complicated, but the basics of this were simple. Profitable companies and farms with assets or loss making companies with assets that far exceeded their loans from a bank would be targeted. The company loans would be transferred to a branch that purported to specialise in company restructuring. Its sole purpose was to make as much money as possible for the bank and its corrupt managers by liquidating the company. They would grossly underestimate the value of the assets, sell them at far less than actual value, recoup the loan, share the profits of the resale at proper value amongst their cohorts and then go for the personal guarantees of the company owners. Often this would be done through documentation that had been altered and signatures forged. The bank would regain far more than the original loan and those that assisted made fortunes. The victims lost everything. The amount of money involved runs to over £100Bn. There has been little effort or enthusiasm by the many regulatory authorities, notably the Bank of England, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to either stop these frauds or bring the perpetrators to justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Avon and Somerset Police and Crime Panel Finds ‘Serious Error of Judgement’ on Part of Police and Crime Commissioner
    Avon and Somerset Police and Crime Panel finds ‘serious error of judgement’ on part of Police and Crime Commissioner Avon and Somerset Police and Crime Panel has found that Police and Crime Commissioner Sue Mountstevens demonstrated a serious error of judgement and breached her Code of Conduct by revealing the identity of a whistleblower to Chief Constable Nick Gargan, the person at the centre of misconduct allegations. As a result the Panel has today, Thursday 30th October, opted to publish its findings as a matter of public interest. The findings follow a complaint alleging that the Commissioner, having been notified that an individual had raised concerns about Mr Gargan’s conduct, revealed the identity of this person to Mr Gargan before he was suspended. The complainant stated that the Commissioner’s Office did not admit to the disclosure for several months and that the issue was compounded when their identity became known to several news agencies. Due to the serious nature of the complaint, the Panel was required to refer the matter to the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) who concluded that there were insufficient grounds to suspect that a criminal offence may have been committed. The IPCC referred the complaint back to the Panel for informal resolution. By law, the informal resolution process prohibits the Panel from investigating the complaint and limits its considerations to the personal conduct of the Commissioner. In light of this the Panel sought Home Office clarification which confirmed its limited powers to request documents and its full ability to call the Commissioner to answer questions from the Panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Policing and Public Value Ian Kearns and Rick Muir March 2019 Data-Driven Policing and Public Value
    DATA-DRIVEN POLICING AND PUBLIC VALUE IAN KEARNS AND RICK MUIR MARCH 2019 DATA-DRIVEN POLICING AND PUBLIC VALUE IAN KEARNS AND RICK MUIR MARCH 2019 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank all those who contributed to this research. In particular we are grateful to Accenture, BT and the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Bath who generously provided the funding for this project. We are also grateful to the members of our Project Advisory Group, including David Darch, Allan Fairley, Lord Toby Harris, Giles Herdale, Simon Kempton and Professor Tom Kirchmaier. We would like to thank all those police forces we visited as part of the research in particular Avon and Somerset Police and Hampshire Constabulary. Authors Dr Ian Kearns is a Senior Associate Fellow of the Police Foundation and during the period in which he was working on this report was also a Visiting Fellow at the Institute for Policy Research at the University of Bath. He has 25 years of experience working in the public, private and NGO sectors. He is a former Deputy Director and Acting Director of the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) where he provided strategic direction on digital government, the new digital economy, national security and crime. Prior to this Ian was a Director in the Global Government Industry Practice of Electronic Data Systems (EDS), an IT services firm with a $20bn turnover. Ian also co-founded and served as the first Director of the European Leadership Network, a network of former Prime Ministers, foreign and defence ministers and other senior figures focused on security issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Avon and Somerset Constabulary
    Form 462 AVON AND SOMERSET CONSTABULARY DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 These notes explain how you can find out what information, if any, is held about you by the Police. Application for access to your personal data held on Avon and Somerset Constabulary’s information systems Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 (Subject Access) Your Rights Subject to certain exemptions, you have a right to be told whether any information is held about you and a right to a copy of that information. The Chief Constable will only give that information if they are satisfied of your identity. You are not entitled to information identifying someone else, unless that person agrees. If you think that information might be held about you, which may identify another person, you may want to get that person’s agreement to you being given information and send it with your application. The Chief Constable’s Rights The Chief Constable may refuse a request where the information is held for: the prevention or detection of crime the apprehension or prosecution of offenders and giving you the information would be likely to prejudice any of these purposes. The information you provide on this form will be used for processing your request and for any other policing purpose. Completed applications Please post completed applications to the following address: Corporate Information Management, Subject Access Team, Avon and Somerset Constabulary, PO Box 37, Valley Road, Portishead, Bristol, BS20 8QJ PLEASE NOTE: - a. We do not acknowledge receipt of applications and forms that have been completed incorrectly will be returned to the applicant.
    [Show full text]
  • Police Officer Questions & Answers Avon and Somerset Constabulary
    Police Officer Questions & Answers Avon and Somerset Constabulary General Does the police force only want young people to join? Anyone over 18 years can join and we welcome school/university leavers, we are also keen to encourage applicants from people of all ages and backgrounds and the valuable life experience they bring with them. You will need a NVQ Level 3 to join the police & need good communication skills, enthusiasm, compassion, commitment and self-motivation. What are the working hours and are you only able to work full-time? The normal working we ek is 40 hours and you will work a variety of shifts- earlies, lates and nights. You will have to work over night and weekends. The sh ift patterns vary, but you do get used to it. Everyone can apply to work part time over a full range of shifts including night duties upon completion of the initial training period. Do you have to be really fit to join the police? You need a good level of fitness, but you do not need to be an “athlete”. There is more information on our website relating to the Fitness tests: https://www.avonandsomerset.police.uk/about-us/recruitment/police-officer/fitness- test/ Do the Police only want to employ white English people? We welcome applicants from all ages, cultures and backgrounds however, you must be a British citizen, EC/EEA national or a Commonwealth Citizen or a foreign national with no restrictions on your stay in the UK. We must also be able to verify your personal background for the minimum of 3 years leading up to your application.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Risk Register Go to Contents Page (Click)
    Avon and Somerset Community Risk Register Go to contents page (click) Avon and Somerset Community Risk Register 1 Avon and Somerset Community Risk Register Contents (Click on chapters) Introduction and Context ...........................................................................................................3 1. Emergency Management Steps ......................................................................................7 2. Avon and Somerset’s Top Risks ........................................................................................9 2.1 Flooding .............................................................................................................................................................10 2.2 Animal Disease ...............................................................................................................................................13 2.3 Industrial Action .............................................................................................................................................14 2.4 Pandemic Influenza ......................................................................................................................................15 2.5 Adverse Weather ............................................................................................................................................17 2.6 Transport Incident (including accidents involving hazardous materials) ..............................19 2.7 Industrial Site Accidents .............................................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Rape Tuesday 16 – Wednesday 17 March 2021 Location: Virtual Programme – Tuesday 16 March - Morning
    Saint Mary’s Centre 18th Annual Conference 2021 The Science of Rape Tuesday 16 – Wednesday 17 March 2021 Location: Virtual Programme – Tuesday 16 March - Morning 9.00am Welcome and Introduction Rachel Coppock, Directorate Manager, Saint Mary’s Centre Chair: Kathy Cowell OBE DL, Chairman of Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust 09.05am Opening Address Baroness Beverley Hughes, Greater Manchester's Deputy Mayor for Policing, Crime, Criminal Justice and Fire. 09.20am Title to be Confirmed Dr Cath White, Clinical Director, Saint Mary’s Centre 09.45am The impacts on ISVAs and ISVA Managers of working with Victims of Sexual Violence Kristina Massey & Kasandra Matthews 10.10am Transforming the Policing response to rape; Project Bluestone DCC Sarah Crewe, NPCC Lead, Adult Sexual Offences, Avon and Somerset Police 10.35am Questions 10.50am BREAK AND ACADEMIC POSTERS Chair: Kate Davies CBE, Director of Health and Jusitice and Sexual Assault Services Commissioning, NHS England 11.00am The Science and Power of Hope Professor Chan Hellman, Director of The Hope Research Centre, The University of Oklahoma, USA 11.35am Tracking an Eight Stage Perpetrator Progression to Intimate Partner Homicide Professor Jane Monckton Smith, University of Gloucestershire 12.05pm Questions 12.20pm Panel Discussion: Walking the tightrope: Is there a space for sexual violence prevention messages? Emmeline May (AKA rockstardinosaurpirateprincess) Professor Betsy Stanko OBE 1.00pm BREAK AND ACADEMIC POSTERS 1 Saint Mary’s Centre 18th Annual Conference 2021 The Science
    [Show full text]
  • Open-Letter-Hate-Crime.Pdf
    RAVON AND SOMERSET POLICE & CRIME COMMISSIONER AVON AND SOMERSET CONSTABULARY Valley Road, Portishead, Bristol BS20 8JJ Valley Road, Portishead, Bristol BS20 8QJ Tel: (01275) 816003 Facsimile (01275) 816388 Tel: (01275) 816007 Facsimile: (01275) 816112 e-mail : [email protected] e-mail : [email protected] Sue Mountstevens Chief Constable: Andy Marsh An open Letter from Avon and Somerset Chief Constable Andy Marsh and PCC Sue Mountstevens In the wake of the EU Referendum we want to take the unusual step of writing an open letter to reassure our communities that we will do everything we can to keep them safe. We have been dismayed at the stories of hate crime victimisation and racial or anti-immigrant abuse reported in the media. Whatever your thoughts on the result, we hope you find the injustice and devastating effects of this as abhorrent as we do. There can never be any excuse for hate crime in any shape or form and this criminality will not be tolerated. Nationally there has been a rise in the number of hate crime incidents to the national online reporting site, and we have seen a troublesome increase across Avon and Somerset too. Since the Referendum our police officers and staff have been reviewing the crime reports coming in to us with even greater scrutiny than before, and we have seen the numbers increase to an average of ten incidents per day in the last week compared to four. Thank you to those who showed courage in reporting. We value the rich, multi-cultural diversity of the cities, towns, villages and rural communities where we live and work and the people that make them, and we know this is true of many of you.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2020/2021
    AVON AND SOMERSET VIOLENCE REDUCTION UNIT Annual Report 2020/2021 SOUTH GLOUCESTERSHIRE BRISTOL NORTH SOMERSET BATH & NORTH EAST SOMERSET SOMERSET January 2021 Introduction “Serious Violence was starting to escalate in the area; lives were being lost and vulnerable people exploited daily. The police and our partners couldn’t respond to the issues in isolation, and thanks to the introduction of Violence Reduction Units (VRUs), we are now working together to make a change. “VRUs are now well established across Avon and Somerset and they continue to provide innovative and collaborative solutions to support young people in our “We welcome the announcement from communities. the Home Office of renewed funding to establish and build on a public health “Despite many challenges and increasing approach to tackling the root causes of concern due to the impact of the these terrible offences that are having a pandemic, the commitment from our devastating impact on victims, partners has been inspiring and the five perpetrators, their families and entire local VRUs have been able to make real communities. impactful change to those who need it most. “I am passionate about protecting the most vulnerable from harm and the VRUs “Our model here in Avon and Somerset is remain a crucial part in taking a unique in being a ‘hub and spoke’ compassionate approach to keeping approach, we decided to devolve the young people and our communities safe. Home Office funding to the five local authority areas (Bristol, Somerset, South “This report highlights the dedication and Gloucestershire, North Somerset and commitment from our VRU colleagues Bath and North East Somerset).
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Mary's Centre 18Th Annual Conference 2021
    Saint Mary’s Centre 18th Annual Conference 2021 The Science of Rape Tuesday 16 – Wednesday 17 March 2021 Location: Virtual Programme – Tuesday 16 March - Morning 9.00am Welcome and Introduction Rachel Coppock, Directorate Manager, Saint Mary's Centre and SAFE Place Merseyside Chair: Dr. Baroness Helen Newlove LLD (hc) Pro. Vice Chancellor, University of Bolton, Deputy Speaker, House of Lords 09.05am Developing a Gender Based Abuse Strategy for GM and responding to HMICFRS VSA Report Baroness Beverley Hughes, Greater Manchester's Deputy Mayor for Policing, Crime, Criminal Justice and Fire. 09.20am Is research in SARCs the poor relation or is that too optimistic a description? Dr Cath White OBE, Clinical Director, Saint Mary's Centre & SAFE Place Merseyside 09.45am The impacts on ISVAs and ISVA Managers of working with Victims of Sexual Violence Kristina Massey, Senior Lecturer, Canterbury Christ Church University Kasandra Matthews, PHD Student Psychology, University of Greenwich 10.10am Transforming the Policing response to rape; Project Bluestone DCC Sarah Crew, NPCC Lead, Adult Sexual Offences, Avon and Somerset Police 10.35am Questions 10.50am BREAK AND ACADEMIC POSTERS Chair: Kate Davies CBE, Director of Health and Justice and Sexual Assault Services Commissioning, NHS England 11.00am The Science and Power of Hope Professor Chan Hellman, Director of The Hope Research Centre, The University of Oklahoma, USA 11.35am Tracking an Eight Stage Perpetrator Progression to Intimate Partner Homicide Professor Jane Monckton Smith, University
    [Show full text]
  • Queen's Birthday Honours List 2021
    Awards for BD21 Order of the British Empire Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire The Rt. Hon. Frederick Richard Penn CURZON, THE EARL HOWE For political and parliamentary service (Amersham, Buckinghamshire) Order of the Bath Dames Commander of the Order of the Bath Elizabeth Anne Finlay GARDINER CB First Parliamentary Counsel, Office of the Parliamentary Counsel. For services to Government and the Legislative Process (Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire) Brenda Mary SULLIVAN (Brenda King) Attorney General for Northern Ireland, lately First Legislative Counsel and Permanent Secretary, Northern Ireland Executive. For services to Constitutional Law (Belfast, Belfast) Knights Commander of the Order of the Bath Edward Christopher OLLARD Lately Clerk of the Parliaments, House of Lords. For services to Parliament (London, Greater London) Order of the British Empire Dames Commander of the Order of the British Empire Professor Helen Valerie ATKINSON CBE FREng Pro-Vice-Chancellor, Aerospace, Transport and Manufacturing, Cranfield University. For services to Engineering and Education (Bedford, Bedfordshire) Professor Phyllida BARLOW CBE Artist and Sculptor. For services to Art (London, Greater London) Catherine Elizabeth BINGHAM Lately Chair, Vaccine Taskforce. For services to the Procurement, Manufacture and Distribution of Covid-19 Vaccines (London, Greater London) Imogen COOPER CBE Pianist. For services to Music (London, Greater London) Professor Sarah Catherine GILBERT Saïd Professorship of Vaccinology, Jenner Institute and Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine. For services to Science and Public Health in Covid Vaccine Development (Headington, Oxfordshire) Margaret Olivia HILLIER MP Member of Parliament for Hackney South and Shoreditch. For political and parliamentary service (London, Greater London) Sandra Gayl HORLEY CBE Lately Chief Executive, Refuge.
    [Show full text]