DOCSLIB.ORG

Brian Booth State Park Comprehensive Plan Draft June 2014 Part 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

o Plans for a gasoline service station, a The entire park property was mapped with large moorage to accommodate private ratings representing the relative probability craft as well as boats for rent and a RIÀQGLQJDUFKHRORJLFDOUHVRXUFHV0RVW swimming pool, did not reach fruition. of the park is rated as “high probability,” The Lodge reportedly burned down in certain isolated areas are rated as “very high the late 1950s. probability,” and some of the property is rated as “low probability.” Given the history of use Historic Features by Native American tribes, there is an overall high likelihood of archaeological resources The Brian Booth State Park area has been present in the park. shaped by the many uses of the land. The DUHDUHSUHVHQWVDEHDXWLIXOPRGLÀHGQDWXUDO landscape that has been home to Native Americans, trappers, timber harvesters, farmers, and recreational uses over time. There are no NQRZQVLJQLÀFDQWFXOWXUDOUHVRXUFHVHOLJLEOHIRU the National Register of Historic Places in the park. However, cultural associations with the site and the scenic setting indicate that telling its stories is important and will help explain how the natural landscape has been transformed over time. Archaeological Features An inventory of the park and a review of UHSRUWÀQGLQJVZHUHFRQGXFWHGLQFRQVXOWDWLRQ ZLWKWKH6WDWH+LVWRULF3UHVHUYDWLRQ2IÀFH (SHPO). At this time, there are no known archaeological sites recorded within the area. A pedestrian survey of 3.5 acres of the park property revealed no archaeological resources. Historic Beach Highway Railroad Trestle ChapterChappter 3:3 PPaParkrkk ResourceResource AAsAssessmentssessments 433 Railroad Map Historic Spruce Company Camp Near Waldport 44 BrianBriian BBoBoothoth SStStateate PPaParkrkk CComprehensiveomprp ehhensiive PlanPllan CHAPTER 4: VISITOR EXPERIENCE ASSESSMENT The summarized information presented in this Visitor Experiences Currently chapter serves as a basis for evaluating needs for and opportunities to provide recreational, Offered at Brian Booth State Park educational and interpretive experiences for Visitor experiences at the park are currently visitors to Brian Booth State Park. Included centered around the facilities at long- are summaries of key information relevant established Ona Beach and the more recently to the mid-coast sub-region on participation established Beaver Creek Natural Area. Beach and trends in various visitor experiences now activities, picnicking and barbecuing, motor or potentially offered at the park, as well as DQGQRQPRWRUERDWLQJÀVKLQJDQGVLJKWVHHLQJ information on the activities offered by the are the traditional activities supported at Ona various recreation lands and providers in the Beach. Beaver Creek Welcome Center, which sub-region. The information sources relied is staffed full time, offers park information, upon for this chapter include studies completed limited natural resource interpretive displays, for, or referenced by, the recently updated and views across the marsh to the south Beaver Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Creek uplands. Non-motor boating on the Plan (SCORP), the Oregon Trails Statewide Beaver Creek Water Trail is supported by a Action Plan, the web sites of agencies WHPSRUDU\ÁRDWLQJODXQFKDVKRUWGLVWDQFHIURP managing the sub-region’s various recreation the Welcome Center, about 2 ½ miles upstream lands, and the Interpretive Assessment report from the boating access at Ona Beach. A hiking prepared by OPRD as background information trail system with over 5 miles of trails takes for this Plan. hikers through the forest and meadows of the south Beaver Creek hills, although this activity is currently not well supported by available parking. The upland trail system and the water trail provide opportunities to see a multitude of bird species, occasionally a beaver or otter, as well as the local elk herd that frequents the Beaver Creek hills. Chapter 4: Visitor Experience Assessmentt 4455 Interpretive and educational programs at, Other Oregon State Parks or supported by, the park are just beginning to grow through the efforts of park rangers In addition to Brian Booth State Park, 35 other supported by volunteers and outside partner state parks are located within the Central organizations. Through the collective efforts, Coast sub-region. The majority of these parks the park offers ranger led programs mostly are viewpoints or recreation sites that provide with natural resource themes, guided hikes, DFFHVVWRWKHEHDFKDOORIWKHSDUNVDUHZLWKLQ birding tours and kayaking tours, as well as several miles of the coast. Hiking opportunities opportunities for community service projects at these sites are primarily along portions of and community outreach. the Oregon Coast Trail. There are numerous whale watching, tidepooling, birding, and other Visitor Audiences wildlife observation opportunities. A diverse demographic has been present Five state parks with campgrounds are located in at the park, engaged in a variety of along the coast between Lincoln City and activities. Fishermen, hikers, kayakers, canoeists, Florence. picnickers, beach goers, local families and WRXULVWVDOOKDYHDVLJQLÀFDQWSUHVHQFH/DUJH - Beverly Beach State Park has over 278 contingents of birders and naturalists have campsites – 51 full hookup, 75 electrical, been present, and large clubs and groups have 128 tent, 21 yurts, 3 group camps, and a repeatedly asked for presentations and guided hiker/biker camp. hikes. The park is becoming an outdoor learning - South Beach State Park has over 317 laboratory for environmental education. campsites – 227 electrical, 60 tent, 27 Other Public Recreation Lands, Facilities and yurts, 3 groups camps, and a hiker/biker Programs in the Sub-Region camp. - Beachside State Recreation Site has over Other Public Recreation Lands, 76 campsites – 32 electrical, 42 tent, 2 Facilities and Programs in the yurts, and a hiker-biker camp. Sub-Region - Carl G. Washburne Memorial State Park has over 67 campsites – 7 electrical, 51 full The Central Oregon Coast sub-region is hookup, 7 walk-in tent, 2 yurts, and a hiker/ URXJKO\GHÀQHGE\YDULRXVVRXUFHVDVWKH biker camp. coastal portions of Lincoln and Lane Counties, from Lincoln City in the north to Florence in the - Devil’s Lake State Recreation Site has over south. Brian Booth State Park falls roughly 90 campsites - 25 full hookup, 5 electrical, in the middle of this area, near the southern 50 tent, 10 yurts, and a hiker/biker camp. border of Lincoln County. Outdoor recreation Recreation Indicators from South Beach State opportunities in this area are provided Park primarily by Oregon State Parks, Lincoln and Lane County Parks, and the U.S. Forest Service. Indicators of need or demand for recreation opportunities can be gleaned from recent Figure 4.1 in this chapter geographically survey data for state parks in the vicinity of illustrates public lands and outdoor recreation Brian Booth. The following statements are areas and facilities in the Central Coast sub- EDVHGRQÀQGLQJVIURPVXUYH\UHVXOWVIRU region. The discussion below highlights the South Beach State Park: major providers and facilities. 4646 BrianB Booth State Park Comprehensive Plan - Nearly all overnight visitors and more than inland along Hwy 229, has 13 campsites with two-thirds of day use visitors live more than no RV hookups. Moonshine Park is located on 31 miles from the park. Most non-local the upper Siletz River and has 42 campsites, visitors come from out-of-state, the Portland including 2 group sites and 2 RV/trailer drive- Metropolitan area, or the Willamette through sites, with no RV hookups. Valley. - The majority of overnight visitors feel that Lane County Parks campsites are too crowded, with too little screening. Lane County operates 14 parks within the area of interest, including 11 day use parks, 2 - More than a third of visitors brought dogs. campgrounds, and 1 wayside. The parks are - Approximately two-thirds of visitors would clustered around Florence on the coast and like to see more opportunities for wildlife inland near Deadwood and Mapleton. Seven observation and hiking. of the parks provide boating access to the Siuslaw River. None of the parks have hiking - Nonwhite populations are trails, with the exception of Heceta Beach underrepresented. outside Florence, which has a short trail to the - The vast majority of visitors arrive in a beach. Harbor Vista Campground, on the coast personal motorized vehicles. Bicyclists just west of Florence, has 38 campsites with account for around 2% or less of visits, some electric and water hookups. Camp Lane, while hikers account for even less. east of Mapleton, features a historic lodge with dormitory style sleeping quarters as well $ERXWRQHÀIWKRIYLVLWRUVDUHRYHUWKHDJH as Adirondack campsites, tree house sleeping of 60. Around ten percent have disabilities structures, and a yurt. related to walking. Lincoln County Parks U.S. Forest Service Lincoln County maintains 12 parks, including The Siuslaw National Forest encompasses 5 day use parks, 3 campgrounds, and a large portion of the coast range in the 2 waysides, covering a total area of Central Oregon Coast and provides a approximately 100 acres. Most of the parks number of opportunities for hiking, horseback are located in the coast range interior and riding, camping, wildlife watching, and provide boating access to major rivers like wilderness exploration. Most of the recreation the Siletz. The County park system has a opportunities in the Siuslaw are concentrated total of 2.5 miles of hiking trails. Three of along the coast between Florence
Recommended publications
  • 2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation

    2019 Oregon Administrative Rules Compilation

    2019 OREGON ADMINISTRATIVE RULES COMPILATION CHAPTER 736 Parks and Recreation Department Published By DENNIS RICHARDSON Secretary of State Copyright 2019 Office of the Secretary of State Rules effective as of January 01, 2019 DIVISION 1 PROCEDURAL RULES 736-001-0000 Notice of Proposed Rules 736-001-0005 Model Rules of Procedure 736-001-0030 Fees for Public Records DIVISION 2 ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITIES 736-002-0010 State Park Cooperating Associations 736-002-0015 Working with Donor Organizations 736-002-0020 Criminal Records Checks 736-002-0030 Definitions 736-002-0038 Designated Positions: Authorized Designee and Contact Person 736-002-0042 Criminal Records Check Process 736-002-0050 Preliminary Fitness Determination. 736-002-0052 Hiring or Appointing on a Preliminary Basis 736-002-0058 Final Fitness Determination 736-002-0070 Crimes Considered 736-002-0102 Appealing a Fitness Determination 736-002-0150 Recordkeeping, Confidentiality, and Retention 736-002-0160 Fees DIVISION 3 WILLAMETTE RIVER GREENWAY PLAN 736-003-0005 Willamette River Greenway Plan DIVISION 4 DISTRIBUTION OF ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE FUNDSTO PUBLIC AND PRIVATELY OWNED LANDMANAGERS, ATV CLUBS AND ORGANIZATIONS 736-004-0005 Purpose of Rule 736-004-0010 Statutory Authority 736-004-0015 Definitions 736-004-0020 ATV Grant Program: Apportionment of Monies 736-004-0025 Grant Application Eligibility and Requirements 736-004-0030 Project Administration 736-004-0035 Establishment of the ATV Advisory Committee 736-004-0045 ATV Operating Permit Agent Application and Privileges 736-004-0060
  • City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget

    City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget

    City of Yachats FY2020-21 Adopted Budget City of Yachats Annual Budget Fiscal Year July 1, 2020 – June 30, 2021 CITY COUNCIL W. John Moore, Mayor Max Glenn, Council President James Tooke, Council Member Leslie Vaaler, Council Member Mary Ellen O’Shaughnessey, Council Member BUDGET COMMITTEE – CITIZEN MEMBERS Lance Bloch Don Groth Dawn Keller John Purcell Brad Webb CITY STAFF Shannon Beaucaire, City Manager Kimmie Jackson, Deputy Recorder David Buckwald, Wastewater Lead Rick McClung, Water Lead www.yachatsoregon.org 2 of 108 City of Yachats FY2020-21 Proposed Budget Table of Contents Reader's Guide: How to Make the Most of the Budget Document ......................................................................... 6 City of Yachats Budget Message ............................................................................................................................... 7 About the City of Yachats ........................................................................................................................................ 29 Yachats Vision Statement ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Council Goals ........................................................................................................................................................... 30 Revenue............................................................................................................................................................... 31
  • Ocean Shore Management Plan

    Ocean Shore Management Plan

    Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Ocean Shore Management Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department January 2005 Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Planning Section 725 Summer Street NE Suite C Salem Oregon 97301 Kathy Schutt: Project Manager Contributions by OPRD staff: Michelle Michaud Terry Bergerson Nancy Niedernhofer Jean Thompson Robert Smith Steve Williams Tammy Baumann Coastal Area and Park Managers Table of Contents Planning for Oregon’s Ocean Shore: Executive Summary .......................................................................... 1 Chapter One Introduction.................................................................................................................. 9 Chapter Two Ocean Shore Management Goals.............................................................................19 Chapter Three Balancing the Demands: Natural Resource Management .......................................23 Chapter Four Balancing the Demands: Cultural/Historic Resource Management .........................29 Chapter Five Balancing the Demands: Scenic Resource Management.........................................33 Chapter Six Balancing the Demands: Recreational Use and Management .................................39 Chapter Seven Beach Access............................................................................................................57 Chapter Eight Beach Safety .............................................................................................................71
  • Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen a THESIS Oregon State University in Partia

    Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen a THESIS Oregon State University in Partia

    Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin, Oregon by Curt N. Veldhuisen A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Completed February 20, 1990 Commencement June 1990 AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Curt N. Veldhuisenfor the degree of Master of Science in Forest Engineeringpresented on February 27, 1990. Title: Coarse Woody Debris in Streams of the Drift Creek Basin. Oregon Abstract Approved: Robert L. Beschta This study examined the occurrence ofcoarse woody debris (i.e., pieces greater than 0.15m in diameter and 2.0 m in length) in first- through fifth-order streams located within the Drift Creek Basin of the Oregon Coast Range. Nine "tributary reachest were surveyed to determine how three land management treatments (undisturbed, patch clearcut with buffer strip, and entirely clearcut) and/or geomorphologywere associated with CWD loadings or piece characteristics. An additional 45 km of third- to fifth-order channelswere surveyed to identify CWD distribution patternsover changing stream size. All surveys recorded channel characteristics and the dimensions and attributes ofeach CWD piece. Coarse woody debris loadings varied greatly (11 to 62 pieces/lOOm, 0.3 to 4.3 m3/100m2 of inchannelvolume) between the tributary reaches, but were not significantly (p > 0.10) related to harvest treatment. However, reaches associated with clearcut treatment containedless hardwood CWD and pieces were significantly shorter, and more decayed than in the other treatments. This suggested that little CWD recruitment had occurred in the 15 to 20 years since harvest. The undisturbed and buffer strip tributaries contained CWD that reflected continued recruitment of both hardwood and conifer trees.
  • Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape

    Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape

    3220 Donald B. Zobel, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331- 2902 e-mail: [email protected] Ecosystem Use by Indigenous People in an Oregon Coastal Landscape Abstract Data regarding probable uses of biological materials by the indigenous people of the Salmon River-Cascade Head area of the Oregon coast were used to estimate the peoples use of various ecosystems near villages. Of 308 uses identified, 256 were attributable to a given species; 124 species were identified. All local ecosystems were important sources of organisms for the people, with no apparent concentration of highly used species in any particular ecosystem. One species was cultivated, one domesticated, and five acquired by trade. Four major plant resources, camas, yew, hazel, and beargrass, are not known from the Cascade Head landscape, but may have been available from elsewhere in village territory. House construction without use of cedar planks, as indicated by ethnographic records, may have resulted from the paucity of western redcedar in the Salmon River lowlands. The scarcity of several widely used taxa near coastal village sites, especially western redcedar, may have limited the wealth of this indigenous population, even on the resource-rich Oregon coast. Introduction Tillamook, who resided near Cascade Head on the north-central Oregon Coast, in an area where Indigenous people used resources primarily from information about historic and modern plant and the landscape in which they resided. The natural animal species distribution is unusually complete. distribution of resources governed the pattern and The list of taxa used was compared to historic richness of their lives.
  • Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    Land Areas of the National Forest System, As of September 30, 2019

    United States Department of Agriculture Land Areas of the National Forest System As of September 30, 2019 Forest Service WO Lands FS-383 November 2019 Metric Equivalents When you know: Multiply by: To fnd: Inches (in) 2.54 Centimeters Feet (ft) 0.305 Meters Miles (mi) 1.609 Kilometers Acres (ac) 0.405 Hectares Square feet (ft2) 0.0929 Square meters Yards (yd) 0.914 Meters Square miles (mi2) 2.59 Square kilometers Pounds (lb) 0.454 Kilograms United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Land Areas of the WO, Lands National Forest FS-383 System November 2019 As of September 30, 2019 Published by: USDA Forest Service 1400 Independence Ave., SW Washington, DC 20250-0003 Website: https://www.fs.fed.us/land/staff/lar-index.shtml Cover Photo: Mt. Hood, Mt. Hood National Forest, Oregon Courtesy of: Susan Ruzicka USDA Forest Service WO Lands and Realty Management Statistics are current as of: 10/17/2019 The National Forest System (NFS) is comprised of: 154 National Forests 58 Purchase Units 20 National Grasslands 7 Land Utilization Projects 17 Research and Experimental Areas 28 Other Areas NFS lands are found in 43 States as well as Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. TOTAL NFS ACRES = 192,994,068 NFS lands are organized into: 9 Forest Service Regions 112 Administrative Forest or Forest-level units 503 Ranger District or District-level units The Forest Service administers 149 Wild and Scenic Rivers in 23 States and 456 National Wilderness Areas in 39 States. The Forest Service also administers several other types of nationally designated
  • Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources

    Timing of In-Water Work to Protect Fish and Wildlife Resources

    OREGON GUIDELINES FOR TIMING OF IN-WATER WORK TO PROTECT FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES June, 2008 Purpose of Guidelines - The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, (ODFW), “The guidelines are to assist under its authority to manage Oregon’s fish and wildlife resources has updated the following guidelines for timing of in-water work. The guidelines are to assist the the public in minimizing public in minimizing potential impacts to important fish, wildlife and habitat potential impacts...”. resources. Developing the Guidelines - The guidelines are based on ODFW district fish “The guidelines are based biologists’ recommendations. Primary considerations were given to important fish species including anadromous and other game fish and threatened, endangered, or on ODFW district fish sensitive species (coded list of species included in the guidelines). Time periods were biologists’ established to avoid the vulnerable life stages of these fish including migration, recommendations”. spawning and rearing. The preferred work period applies to the listed streams, unlisted upstream tributaries, and associated reservoirs and lakes. Using the Guidelines - These guidelines provide the public a way of planning in-water “These guidelines provide work during periods of time that would have the least impact on important fish, wildlife, and habitat resources. ODFW will use the guidelines as a basis for the public a way of planning commenting on planning and regulatory processes. There are some circumstances where in-water work during it may be appropriate to perform in-water work outside of the preferred work period periods of time that would indicated in the guidelines. ODFW, on a project by project basis, may consider variations in climate, location, and category of work that would allow more specific have the least impact on in-water work timing recommendations.
  • Playbookyour Youth & Adult Recreation Registration Opens April 20 Online Edition

    Playbookyour Youth & Adult Recreation Registration Opens April 20 Online Edition

    SUMMER REGISTRATION summer 2020 BEGINS APRIL 20 AT 5:30 AM playbookyour youth & adult recreation registration opens april 20 online edition includes: Art Station, Juniper Swim & Fitness Center, The Pavilion and Bend Senior Center SUMMER 2020 PAYMENT OPTION: Payment is optional at time of registration. Choose your payment amount from no money down to full fee. Any remaining fees are due 30 days prior to program start date. CONTACT US phone: (541) 389-7275 email: [email protected] website: bendparksandrec.org ADMINISTRATION & RECREATION SERVICES summer 2020 | online edition 799 SW Columbia St. • p. (541) 389-7275 Welcome to “Your Playbook.” You’re invited Bienvenido a su Revista de Actividades Mon. - Fri. 8:00 am - 5:00 pm to play, learn and thrive in the many recreation Recreativas “Playbook.” Los invitamos a Administration will be closed: May 25 - Memorial Day, programs, facilities, parks and trails available participar, aprender y crecer de manera sana July 3 - 4 - Independence Day, Sept. 7 - Labor Day to you this season. Whether you are one, en muchos de los programas de recreación, one hundred or somewhere in between, centros de recreación, parques y senderos THE ART STATION the Bend Park & Recreation District is disponibles durante esta estación del año. 313 SW Shevlin Hixon Dr. • p. (541) 617-1317 your place for play. Bend Park & Recreation District es el lugar Open for scheduled programs and open de recreación ya sea para una persona, studio hours. See schedule online. cientos o menos. BEND SENIOR CENTER VISION STATEMENT: To be a leader in FOLLOW US: 1600 SE Reed Market Rd.
  • Yachats River Basin Fish Management Plan

    Yachats River Basin Fish Management Plan

    ( YACHATS RIVER BASIN FISH MANAGEMENT PLAN Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife November 1997 l TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3 Overview.............................................................................................. 5 Habitat................................................................................................ 9 Fall Chinook Salmon............................................................................ 27 Chum Salmon....................................................................................... 31 Coho Salmon........................................................................................ 33 Winter Steelhead .................... .............. ....... ......... ............ ............. ... .. .. 42 Cutthroat Trout.................................................................................... 4 7 Pacific Lamprey........................... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 51 Crayfish................................................................................................ 53 Angler Access ... ... .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 56 Priorities............................................................................................... 58 Implementation and Review.................................................................. 64 References...........................................................................................
  • O R E G O N North Pacific Ocean

    O R E G O N North Pacific Ocean

    412 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 9 31 MAY 2020 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 9 124° 123° NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage 18520 C O L http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml U M B I A 126° 125° 18521 R Astoria I V E R 46° Seaside Tillamook Head NEHALEM RIVER 18556 Vancouver 18558 TILLAMOOK BAY Portland Cape Lookout Cascade Head 45° SILETZ RIVER YAQUINA RIVER ALSEA RIVER 18581 18561 NORTH PA CIFIC OCEAN OREGON Heceta Head 44° 18583 SIUSLAW RIVER 18584 UMPQUA RIVER 18587 Coos Bay Cape Arago 18588 COQUILLE RIVER 43° 18589 Cape Blanco 18600 18580 Port Orford ROUGE RIVER 18601 CHETCO RIVER 42° 18602 CALIFORNIA 31 MAY 2020 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 9 ¢ 413 Chetco River to Columbia River, Oregon (1) This chapter describes 200 miles of the Oregon coast rare clear skies; it is more likely in early winter. Winter from the mouth of the Chetco River to the mouth of the and spring winds are moderately strong, particularly south Columbia River. Also described are the Chetco and Rogue of Newport. From North Bend southward, winds reach 17 Rivers, Port Orford, Coquille River, Coos Bay, Umpqua knots or more about 5 to 15 percent of the time and 28 and Siuslaw Rivers, Yaquina Bay and River, Nehalem knots or more about 1 to 3 percent of the time. Extreme River and Tillamook Bay. The cities of Coos Bay and wind speeds usually occur in either winter or early spring North Bend on Coos Bay and Newport on Yaquina Bay and have climbed to around 50 knots.
  • A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes

    A Bill to Designate Certain National Forest System Lands in the State of Oregon for Inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for Other Purposes

    97 H.R.7340 Title: A bill to designate certain National Forest System lands in the State of Oregon for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System and for other purposes. Sponsor: Rep Weaver, James H. [OR-4] (introduced 12/1/1982) Cosponsors (2) Latest Major Action: 12/15/1982 Failed of passage/not agreed to in House. Status: Failed to Receive 2/3's Vote to Suspend and Pass by Yea-Nay Vote: 247 - 141 (Record Vote No: 454). SUMMARY AS OF: 12/9/1982--Reported to House amended, Part I. (There is 1 other summary) (Reported to House from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs with amendment, H.Rept. 97-951 (Part I)) Oregon Wilderness Act of 1982 - Designates as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System the following lands in the State of Oregon: (1) the Columbia Gorge Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (2) the Salmon-Huckleberry Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (3) the Badger Creek Wilderness in the Mount Hood National Forest; (4) the Hidden Wilderness in the Mount Hood and Willamette National Forests; (5) the Middle Santiam Wilderness in the Willamette National Forest; (6) the Rock Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (7) the Cummins Creek Wilderness in the Siuslaw National Forest; (8) the Boulder Creek Wilderness in the Umpqua National Forest; (9) the Rogue-Umpqua Divide Wilderness in the Umpqua and Rogue River National Forests; (10) the Grassy Knob Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou National Forest; (11) the Red Buttes Wilderness in and adjacent to the Siskiyou
  • DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-06, Metallic and Industrial Mineral Resource Potential of Southern and Eastern Oregon

    DOGAMI Open-File Report O-16-06, Metallic and Industrial Mineral Resource Potential of Southern and Eastern Oregon

    Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries Brad Avy, State Geologist OPEN-FILE REPORT O-16-06 METALLIC AND INDUSTRIAL MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF SOUTHERN AND EASTERN OREGON: REPORT TO THE OREGON LEGISLATURE Mineral Resource Potential High Moderate Low Present Not Found Base Metals Bentonite Chromite Diatomite Limestone Lithium Nickel Perlite Platinum Group Precious Metals Pumice Silica Sunstones Uranium Zeolite G E O L O G Y F A N O D T N M I E N M E T R R A A L P I E N D D U N S O T G R E I R E S O 1937 Ian P. Madin1, Robert A. Houston1, Clark A. Niewendorp1, Jason D. McClaughry2, Thomas J. Wiley1, and Carlie J.M. Duda1 2016 1 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, 800 NE Oregon St., Ste. 965 Portland, OR 97232 2 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, Baker City Field Office, Baker County Courthouse, 1995 3rd St., Ste. 130, Baker City, OR 97814 Metallic and Industrial Mineral Resource Potential of Southern and Eastern Oregon: Report to the Oregon Legislature NOTICE This product is for informational purposes and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or sur- veying purposes. Users of this information should review or consult the primary data and information sources to ascertain the usability of the information. This publication cannot substitute for site-specific investigations by qualified practitioners. Site-specific data may give results that differ from the results shown in the publication. Cover image: Maps show mineral resource potential by individual commodity.