Rangifer Tarandus Platyrhynchus) Females Subject/Study Track Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Level Month and Year Number of Pages Master’S Thesis 12.10.2020 43P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rangifer Tarandus Platyrhynchus) Females Subject/Study Track Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Level Month and Year Number of Pages Master’S Thesis 12.10.2020 43P Life History Effects in the Behavior of Svalbard Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) Females Master’s thesis Laura Puikkonen Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Helsinki October 2020 Faculty Degree Programme Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences Master’s programme in ecology and evolutionary biology Author Laura Puikkonen Title Life history effects in the behavior of Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) females Subject/Study track Ecology and evolutionary biology Level Month and year Number of pages Master’s thesis 12.10.2020 43p. + references and supplements Abstract Individuals of long-lived animal species can improve their reproductive success through experience. While individual’s resources available for survival and reproduction decrease toward the end of its lifespan through senescence, terminal investment hypothesis predicts the less likely old individuals reproduce again the more they invest in their current offspring. Experience gained through a long lifespan might have an important role in changing behavior to optimize the use of resources and compensate the effects of senescence. In addition, behavioral plasticity allows animals to respond changes in their habitat within much shorter timespan than on an evolutionary timescale. Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) is a wild subspecies of reindeer. It is only found in Svalbard, a remote archipelago in the Arctic with extreme weather conditions rapidly changing due to climate change. It has been isolated at least 5000 years and adapted to a barren habitat with nearly no hunting, predation or harassment of flying insects. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of age and a calf at heel in Svalbard reindeer females’ maternal, vigilant, and social behavior and time budget in the light of life history theory and its senescence and terminal investment hypotheses. I carried out the field work for the study in two periods in summer in Semmeldalen valley and the south-western part of Reindalen valley on the island of Spitsbergen, Svalbard. I collected behavioral data on marked individuals by instant scan sampling and focal watch methods, wrote observations down manually and later fed them into computer. In addition, I have used birth year data collected by the long-term monitoring program by the Norwegian Polar Institute. I used generalized linear mixed models to analyze the effects of age and calf at heel to the behavior of females. The main results include that young dams maintained shorter distance to their calf in July than in August, and old females were less vigilant. Younger dams and older females without calves were in smaller groups than older dams and younger females without calves. In addition, females with calves spend proportionately less time lying down than females without calves. Dams maintained a longer distance to the nearest neighbor than females without calves. Older dams spend proportionately more time feeding and in groups in August than younger dams. These results show that the age and calf at heel do play a role in the behavior of Svalbard reindeer females and the effect varies over the course of the short Arctic summer. Experience may make older females more effective mothers by optimize the use of resources for example from vigilance to feeding in a predator-free environment. On the other hand, senescence may affect the amount of energy females can spend on their calves, potentially influencing their survival. Keywords life history theory, reindeer, age, senescence, terminal investment, maternal behavior, vigilance, time budget Supervisor or supervisors Emma Vitikainen Where deposited HELDA - Digital Repository of the University of Helsinki Additional information Field work was conducted in cooperation with University Center in Svalbard (UNIS). Tiedekunta Koulutusohjelma Bio- ja ympäristötieteellinen tiedekunta Ekologian ja evoluutiobiologian maisteriohjelma Tekijä Laura Puikkonen Työn nimi Elämänhistorian vaikutus Huippuvuorten peuranaaraiden (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) käyttäytymiseen Oppiaine/Opintosuunta Ekologia ja evoluutiobiologia Työn laji Aika Sivumäärä Pro gradu -tutkielma 12.10.2020 43 s. + lähdeluettelo ja liitteet Tiivistelmä Pitkäikäisten eläinlajien yksilöt voivat parantaa lisääntymismenestystään kokemuksen avulla. Samalla, kun yksilön resurssit selviytymiseen ja lisääntymiseen laskevat senesenssin vuoksi, terminaalisen panostuksen hypoteesi ennustaa vanhan yksilön käyttävän sitä enemmän resursseja jälkikasvunsa hyväksi, mitä epätodennäköisemmin kyseinen yksilö lisääntyy tulevaisuudessa. Pitkän elämänkaaren varrella kerätty kokemus saattaa olla tärkeä elementti käyttäytymisen muutoksessa, jonka avulla yksilö pystyy optimoimaan resurssiensa hyödyntämisen ja kompensoimaan senesenssin vaikutuksia. Sen lisäksi, käyttäytymisen muovautuvuus mahdollistaa eläimen sopeutumisen elinympäristön muutoksiin paljon lyhyemmällä aikavälillä kuin evolutiivinen kehitys. Huippuvuorten peura (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) on peuran eli poron villi alalaji. Sitä tavataan ainoastaan Huippuvuorilla, joka on syrjäinen saaristo arktisella alueella, ja jonka äärimmäiset sääolot muuttuvat nopeasti ilmastonmuutoksen seurauksena. Alalaji on ollut eristyksissä vähintään 5000 vuoden ajan ja sopeutunut karuun elinympäristöön, sekä metsästyksen, saalistajien ja lentävien hyönteisten aiheuttaman häirinnän puuttumiseen. Tämän tutkielman tavoite on tutkia iän ja vasan vaikutusta Huippuvuorten peuranaaraiden maternaaliseen ja sosiaaliseen käyttäytymiseen, vigilanssiin ja aikabudjettiin elämänhistoriateorian sekä senesenssi ja terminaalinen panostus -hypoteesien puitteissa. Tein tutkielmaan kuuluvat kenttätyöt kahtena ajanjaksona kesällä Semmeldalenin laakossa ja Reindalenin laakson lounaisosissa Spitsbergenin saarella Huippuvuorilla. Havainnoin merkittyjen yksilöiden käyttäytymistä instant scan sampling ja focal watch - metodeilla, kirjasin havaintoni ylös käsin, ja siirsin ne myöhemmin tietokoneelle. Lisäksi hyödynsin Norwegian Polar Institute - instituutin pitkäaikaisen seurantaohjelman keräämiä tietoja peurojen syntymävuosista. Analysoin iän ja alle vieroitusikäisen vasan vaikutusta peuranaaraiden käyttäytymiseen yleistettyjen lineaaristen sekamallien avulla. Tuloksien perusteella nuoret emät ovat lähempänä vasojaan heinä- kuin elokuussa, ja vanhemmat peuranaaraat ovat vähemmän valppaita. Nuoremmat emät ja vanhemmat naaraat ilman vasoja olivat pienemmissä ryhmissä kuin vanhemmat emät ja nuoremmat naaraat. Emien etäisyys lähimpään naapuriin oli keskimäärin pidempi, kuin vasattomien naaraiden. Lisäksi naaraat ilman vasaa viettivät suhteessa enemmän aikaa maaten kuin emät. Vanhemmat emät viettivät suhteessa enemmän aikaa syöden sekä ryhmissä elokuussa, kuin nuoremmat emät. Tulokset näyttävät, että ikä ja alle vieroitusikäinen vasa vaikuttavat Huippuvuorten peuranaaraiden käyttäytymiseen, ja vaikutus vaihtelee kesän edetessä. Kokemus saattaa tehdä vanhemmista naaraista tehokkaampia emiä auttamalla niitä optimoimaan resurssien käyttöä esimerkiksi valppaudesta syömiseen saalistajista vapaassa ympäristössä. Toisaalta senesenssi saattaa vähentää vasojen hoitoon käytettävissä olevan energian määrään, potentiaalisesti vaikuttaen niiden selviytymiseen. Avainsanat elämänkaariteoria, peura, ikä, senesenssi, terminaalinen panostus, maternaalinen käyttäytyminen, valppaus, aikabudjetti Ohjaaja tai ohjaajat Emma Vitikainen Säilytyspaikka HELDA - Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto / HELDA Muita tietoja Kenttätyö tehtiin University Center in Svalbard (UNIS) -yliopistokeskuksen avustuksella. “The differential allocation of energy to either reproduction or survival represents a major conflict with important implications for patterns of life history.” - Loison & Strand (2005) 4 Table of contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 1.1 Life history theory: traits and trade-offs .............................................................................................. 6 1.2 Senescence and terminal investment in ungulates ............................................................................... 7 1.3 Objectives, research questions and hypotheses...................................................................................10 2 Materials and methods ..........................................................................................................................................12 2.1 Svalbard reindeer as a study species ..................................................................................................12 2.2 Study area .........................................................................................................................................14 2.3 Studied individuals ............................................................................................................................15 2.4 Observation period ............................................................................................................................16 2.5 Behavioral observations ....................................................................................................................17 2.5.1 Instantaneous scan sampling ......................................................................................................18 2.5.2 Focal watches ............................................................................................................................21
Recommended publications
  • Svalbard Reindeer As an Indicator of Ecosystem Changes in the Arctic Terrestrial Ecosystem
    Postprint of: Pacyna A., Koziorowska, K., Chmiel, S., Mazerski J., Polkowska Ż.: Svalbard reindeer as an indicator of ecosystem changes in the Arctic terrestrial ecosystem. CHEMOSPHERE. Vol. 203 (2018), pp. 209-218. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.158 1 Svalbard reindeer as an indicator of ecosystem changes in the Arctic terrestrial 2 ecosystem 3 Aneta Dorota Pacyna1, Katarzyna Koziorowska2, Stanisław Chmiel3, Jan 4 Mazerski4, Żaneta Polkowska1* 5 6 1Gdansk University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, 11/12 Narutowicza 7 st, Gdansk 80-233, Poland 8 2Institute of Oceanology Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Powstańców Warszawy 55, Sopot, Poland 9 3Department of Hydrology, Faculty of Earth Sciences and Spatial Management, Maria Curie-Skłodowska 10 University, Kraśnicka Ave. 2 cd, 20-718 Lublin, Poland 11 4Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and 12 Biochemistry, 11/12 Narutowicza st, Gdańsk 80-233, Poland 13 *corresponding author [email protected] 14 15 Abstract 16 Over the years, noticeable effort has been directed towards contaminant determination in 17 multiple biotic samples collected from the inhabitants of the Arctic. Little consideration has 18 been given to polar herbivores, however, especially those from the European parts of the 19 Arctic. To provide a broader perspective, we aimed to decipher trace element concentration 20 in hairs of the key species in the Arctic, namely the Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus 21 platyrhynchus), and to recognise whether diet variations could correspond with forward 22 exposure. The effect of habitat and diet was investigated using the ratios of stable isotopes of 1 23 carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N), and previous literature studies on vegetation from the areas 24 of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou (Barren-Ground Population) Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Barren-ground population in Canada THREATENED 2016 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2016. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Barren-ground population, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 123 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Anne Gunn, Kim Poole, and Don Russell for writing the status report on Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Barren-ground population, in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee, with the support of the members of the Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), population de la toundra, au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Caribou — Photo by A. Gunn. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2016. Catalogue No. CW69-14/746-2017E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-07782-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – November 2016 Common name Caribou - Barren-ground population Scientific name Rangifer tarandus Status Threatened Reason for designation Members of this population give birth on the open arctic tundra, and most subpopulations (herds) winter in vast subarctic forests.
    [Show full text]
  • TB1066 Current Stateof Knowledge and Research on Woodland
    June 2020 A Review of the Relationship Between Flow,Current Habitat, State and of Biota Knowledge in LOTIC and SystemsResearch and on Methods Woodland for Determining Caribou Instreamin Canada Low Requirements 9491066 Current State of Knowledge and Research on Woodland Caribou in Canada No 1066 June 2020 Prepared by Kevin A. Solarik, PhD NCASI Montreal, Quebec National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. Acknowledgments A great deal of thanks is owed to Dr. John Cook of NCASI for his considerable insight and the revisions he provided in improving earlier drafts of this report. Helpful comments on earlier drafts were also provided by Kirsten Vice, NCASI. For more information about this research, contact: Kevin A. Solarik, PhD Kirsten Vice NCASI NCASI Director of Forestry Research, Canada and Vice President, Sustainable Manufacturing and Northeastern/Northcentral US Canadian Operations 2000 McGill College Avenue, 6th Floor 2000 McGill College Avenue, 6th Floor Montreal, Quebec, H3A 3H3 Canada Montreal, Quebec, H3A 3H3 Canada (514) 907-3153 (514) 907-3145 [email protected] [email protected] To request printed copies of this report, contact NCASI at [email protected] or (352) 244-0900. Cite this report as: NCASI. 2020. Current state of knowledge and research on woodland caribou in Canada. Technical Bulletin No. 1066. Cary, NC: National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. Errata: September 2020 - Table 3.1 (page 34) and Table 5.2 (pages 55-57) were edited to correct omissions and typos in the data. © 2020 by the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Caribou (Rangifer tarandus) is a species of deer that lives in the tundra, taiga, and forest habitats at high latitudes in the northern hemisphere, including areas of Russia and Scandinavia, the United States, and Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas in Svalbard – Securing Internationally Valuable Cultural and Natural Heritage Contents Preface
    Protected areas in Svalbard – securing internationally valuable cultural and natural heritage Contents Preface ........................................................................ 1 – Moffen Nature Reserve ......................................... 13 From no-man’s-land to a treaty and the Svalbard – Nordaust-Svalbard Nature Reserve ...................... 14 Environmental Protection Act .................................. 4 – Søraust-Svalbard Nature Reserve ......................... 16 The history of nature and cultural heritage – Forlandet National Park .........................................18 protection in Svalbard ................................................ 5 – Indre Wijdefjorden National Park ......................... 20 The purpose of the protected areas .......................... 6 – Nordenskiöld Land National Park ........................ 22 Protection values ........................................................ 7 – Nordre Isfjorden National Park ............................ 24 Nature protection areas in Svalbard ........................10 – Nordvest-Spitsbergen National Park ................... 26 – Bird sanctuaries ..................................................... 11 – Sassen-Bünsow Land National Park .................... 28 – Bjørnøya Nature Reserve ...................................... 12 – Sør-Spitsbergen National Park ..............................30 – Ossian Sars Nature Reserve ................................. 12 Svalbard in a global context ..................................... 32 – Hopen Nature Reserve
    [Show full text]
  • And Flight Behaviour in Subpopulations of Svalbard Reindeer Rangifer
    Vigilance and fright- and flight behaviour in subpopulations of Svalbard reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus in Nordenskiöld Land, Svalbard Vaktsomhet og frykt- og fluktåtferd i subpopulasjonar av svalbardrein Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus på Nordenskiöld Land, Svalbard Steinar Lund MASTER THESIS 60 CREDITS 2008 OF DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY ECOLOGY AND NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGAMENT PREFACE This Master thesis, written at the Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, is the final 60 credits of my Master of Science degree in Natural Resource Management. The thesis is part of a larger research programme conducted by The University of Oslo. The field work was funded by The Research Council of Norway, Norwegian Polar Institute and Framkomiteens Polarfond. I would like to thank my supervisors Olav Hjeljord and Eigil Reimers. A special thanks to Eigil for thoroughly supervision throughout the whole process and for allowing me to take part in this project. Also thanks to Pål Preede Revheim and Vidar Selås for tips on the statistical part of the thesis. Last but not least, thank you Ronny Steen and Knut Fredrik Øi, my good friends and field companions in thick and thin. So many hours under the midnight sun, so many miles wandered in the spectacular landscape of Svalbard. Norwegian University of Life Sciences Ås, May 13th 2008 Steinar Lund 1 ABSTRACT Svalbard reindeer Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus survival is based upon minimal energy output and optimal grazing during summer, to withstand a marginal Arctic climate. Svalbard reindeer is by nature relaxed upon encounters with humans, due to the absence of coevolution with predators and humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Svalbard Reindeer (Rangifer Tarandus Platyrhynchus) a Status Report
    Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) A status report Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, Ingrid M. G. Paulsen, Steve Albon, Gustav Busch Arntsen, Brage B. Hansen, Rolf Langvatn, Leif Egil Loe, Mathilde Le Moullec, Øystein Overrein, Bart Peeters, Virve Ravolainen, Erik Ropstad, Audun Stien, Nicholas J. C. Tyler, Vebjørn Veiberg, Renè van der Wal, Roy Andersen, Larissa T. Beumer, Isabell Eischeid, Mads Forchhammer, R. Justin Irvine, Filippo Marolla, Gabriel Pigeon, Eigil Reimers, and Liv Monica Trondrud Rapportserie / Report Series 151 Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, Ingrid M. G. Paulsen, Steve Albon, Gustav Busch Arntsen, Brage B. Hansen, Rolf Langvatn, Leif Egil Loe, Mathilde Le Moullec, Øystein Overrein, Bart Peeters, Virve Ravolainen, Erik Ropstad, Audun Stien, Nicholas J. C. Tyler, Vebjørn Veiberg, Renè van der Wal, Roy Andersen, Larissa T. Beumer, Isabell Eischeid, Mads Forchhammer, R. Justin Irvine, Filippo Marolla, Gabriel Pigeon, Eigil Reimers, and Liv Monica Trondrud Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) A status report The Norwegian Polar Institute is Norway’s central governmental institution for management-related research, mapping and environmental monitoring in the Arctic and the Antarctic. The Institute advises Norwegian authorities on matters concerning polar environmental management and is the official environmental management body for Norway’s Antarctic territorial claims. The Institute is a Directorate within the Ministry of Climate and Environment. Norsk Polarinstitutt er Norges hovedinstitusjon for kartlegging, miljøovervåking og forvaltningsrettet forskning i Arktis og Antarktis. Instituttet er faglig og strategisk rådgiver i miljøvernsaker i disse områdene og har forvaltningsmyndighet i norsk del av Antarktis. Instituttet er et direktorat under Klima- og miljødepartementet. 1 Contact: Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, [email protected] Norwegian Polar Institute, Fram Centre, 9296 Tromsø, Norway Contributions: Rolf Langvatn1* (Background and rationale) Nicholas J.
    [Show full text]
  • Intervention from FRMC
    Fort Resolution Métis Council 1 August, 2019 INTERVENTION REPORT MVEIRB File No EA1819-01. Diavik Diamond Mine - Processed Kimberlite to Mine Workings 1 Table of Contents Summary and Recommendations ................................................................................................. 4 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................. 8 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Organization of the Intervention Report ............................................................................ 9 1.2 Fort Resolution Métis Council ........................................................................................... 10 2.0 Caribou ................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Project-Specific And Cumulative Impacts On Caribou ...................................................... 11 2.1.1 Issue Statement ........................................................................................................... 11 2.1.2 DDMI’s Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 FRMC’s Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 11 2.1.4 Evidence and Rationale ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Visitor Sites in Svalbard: from a Precautionary Approach Towards Knowledge-Based Management Dagmar Hagen,1 Odd I
    PERSPECTIVE Managing visitor sites in Svalbard: from a precautionary approach towards knowledge-based management Dagmar Hagen,1 Odd I. Vistad,2 Nina E. Eide,1 Anne C. Flyen3 & Kirstin Fangel2 1 Terrestrial Ecology Department, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, PO Box 5685 Sluppen, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway 2 Human Dimension Department, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Fakkelga˚ rden, NO-2624 Lillehammer, Norway 3 Buildings Department, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research, PO Box 736 Sentrum, NO-0105 Oslo, Norway Keywords Abstract Arctic; resource management; planning; tourism. Increased tourism in the Arctic calls for more knowledge to meet management challenges. This paper reviews existing knowledge of the effects of human Correspondence use on vegetation, fauna and cultural heritage in Svalbard, and it addresses Dagmar Hagen, Terrestrial Ecology the need for site-specific knowledge for improved management. This paper Department, Norwegian Institute for draws upon scientific studies, knowledge held by management authorities Nature Research, PO Box 5685 Sluppen, and local people, the Governor’s database on visitors and visited sites and our NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] own data from landing sites we visited. There is a certain level of basic knowledge available, allowing us to roughly grade the vulnerability of sites. However, there is a thorough lack of site-specific data related to the manage- ment of single locations or groups of similar locations. Future research needs to address specific on-site challenges in the management of visitor sites. Relevant management models and measures are discussed. We contend that a shift away from a blanket application of the precautionary principle and towards a more integrated, site-specific and evidence-based management plan will contribute to more trusted and reliable, and thereby acceptable among stakeholders, decisions in the management of growing tourism activity in Svalbard.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Northern Mountain population Central Mountain population Southern Mountain population in Canada Northern Mountain population - SPECIAL CONCERN Central Mountain population - ENDANGERED Southern Mountain population - ENDANGERED 2014 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2014. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Northern Mountain population, Central Mountain population and Southern Mountain population in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xxii + 113 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2002. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 98 pp. (Species at Risk Status Reports) Thomas, D.C., and D.R. Gray. 2002. Update COSEWIC status report on the woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Woodland Caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-98 pp. Kelsall, J.P. 1984. COSEWIC status report on the woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 103 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Deborah Cichowski for writing the status report on Caribou Rangifer tarandus, Northern Mountain population, Central Mountain population and Southern Mountain population in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This status report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 SUBMISSION to the NUNAVUT WILDLIFE
    SUBMISSION TO THE NUNAVUT WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR Information: Decision: X Issue: Downlisting of Peary Caribou from Endangered to Threatened. Background: In October 2016 the Committee on the Status of Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) provided a re‐ assessment of Peary Caribou to the federal Minister of the Environment. This begins the formal listing process under the federal Species at Risk Act. Peary Caribou, which are currently listed under the federal SARA as Endangered, have been re‐assessed by COSEWIC in a lower risk category as Threatened. A recovery strategy is required for both Endangered and Threatened species. If Peary Caribou are downlisted under the federal SARA, a recovery strategy will still be required and it will not affect the current recovery strategy development process currently underway for Peary Caribou GN - Morgan Anderson Community consultations on the proposed downlisting of Peary Caribou were held with hunters and trappers organizations (HTOs) and regional wildlife boards in the range of Peary Caribou between June and August 2017. Organizations were asked to provide their formal position on the proposed downlisting and with any other comments, concerns or information that they feel should be considered. Consultation packages, in Inuktitut and English, were sent by mail and email. They included: a letter, information on the assessment and a questionnaire/response form. Follow‐up calls to the HTOs and RWBs were made on September 27, 2017. Results of Consultation: Kitikmeot Regional Wildlife Board No response
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 18-1: Large Mammals: Ruminants-Cervidae
    Glime, J. M. 2018. Large Mammals: Ruminants – Cervidae. Chapter 18-1. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 2. 18-1-1 Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 18-1 LARGE MAMMALS: RUMINANTS - CERVIDAE TABLE OF CONTENTS Ruminantia – Ruminants ...................................................................................................................................................... 18-1-2 Impact of Ruminants on Bryophytes .................................................................................................................................... 18-1-4 Grazing ........................................................................................................................................................................ 18-1-4 Trampling ................................................................................................................................................................... 18-1-12 Manuring .................................................................................................................................................................... 18-1-14 Life on Manure – Splachnaceae ......................................................................................................................................... 18-1-15 Cervidae – Deer, Elk, Moose, and Caribou .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Svalbard Reindeer (Rangifer Tarandus Platyrhynchus) Antler Characteristics Reflecting the Local Environmental Conditions
    FOLIA OECOLOGICA – vol. 46, no. 1 (2019), doi: 10.2478/foecol-2019-0003 Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) antler characteristics reflecting the local environmental conditions Jan Kavan1*, Veronika Anděrová2 1Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137, Brno, Czech Republic 2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 37005, České Budějovice, Czech Republic Abstract Kavan, J., Anděrová, V., 2019. Svalbard reindeer (Rangifer tarandus platyrhynchus) antler characteristics reflecting the local environmental conditions.Folia Oecologica, 46: 16–23. A new non-invasive method based on picture analysis was used to estimate the conditions in Svalbard rein- deer populations. The well-being of an individual subject is often expressed through visual indices. Two dis- tinct reindeer populations were compared based on their antler parameters. Relative antler size and number of tines are variables supposed to reflect correspondingly the environmental conditions of sedentary populations within the growing season. The occurrence areas of two studied populations are distinctly isolated – separated with high mountain ridges, glaciers and fjords. The population in Petuniabukta occupies a sparsely vegetated region with harsh climatic conditions, whereas Skansbukta represents an area with continuous tundra vege- tation cover, milder climatic conditions and, consequently, also a longer vegetation season. These environ- mental factors probably caused significant differences in the relative antler size and number of tines in the studied species. The Skansbukta population exhibited a larger relative antler size and higher number of tines than the population in Petuniabukta (both parameters differed significantly, p < 0.01). This difference reflects concisely the different environmental conditions of both locations.
    [Show full text]