Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review 1 PICTURES FOR THE NATION: Conceptualizing a Collection of 'Old Masters' for London 1775-1800 by Kristin Erin Campbell A thesis submitted to the Department of Art In conformity with the requirements for The degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada January 2009 Copyright © Kristin Campbell, 2009 Abstract This thesis addresses the growing impulse towards establishing a public, national collection of Old Master pictures for Britain, located in London, in the last quarter of the eighteenth-century. It does so by identifying the importance of individual conceptualizations of what such a collection might mean for a nation, and how it might come to be realized for an imprecisely defined public. My thesis examines the shifting dynamics between private and public collections during the period of 1775 to 1800, repositioning notions of what constituted space for viewing and accessing art in a national context, and investigates just who participated in the ensuing dialogues about various uses of art for the nation. To this end, three case studies have been employed. The first examines the collection of pictures assembled by Sir Robert Walpole and their public legacy. The second explores the proposal for a national collection of art put forth by art dealer Noel Desenfans. The third examines the frustrated plans of Sir Joshua Reynolds for his collection of Old Master pictures. Through the respective lenses provided by the case studies, it is demonstrated that the envisioning of a national gallery for Britain pitched competing perspectives against each other, as different kinds of people jockeyed for cultural authority. The process of articulating and shaping these ambitions with an eye towards national benefit was only beginning to be explored, and negotiations of private ambitions and interests surrounding picture collections for the public was further complicated by factors of social class and profession. This thesis demonstrate that the boundaries of participation in matters concerning art for the nation were not fixed regarding Old Master pictures and the value placed on them in late eighteenth-century London. i Acknowledgements I had ambitious plans, coming out of my experience doing special field examinations in the Department of Art at Queen’s University. I was determined that my dissertation could cover at least a hundred years of art viewing in London, between 1750 and 1850. It was my intention to look at practice of touring and visiting histories of private and public collections in both town and country houses, and the differences between temporary and permanent art exhibitions. I wanted to expand on the idea of what it meant to have space in which to view art objects; not only physical ones like drawing rooms and galleries, but also descriptive and prescriptive spaces, particularly those textual and descriptive journeys in guidebooks, pamphlets and newspapers that might enable a mysterious and largely anonymous public who didn’t often see art, to imagine it. From the vantage point that only a completed project affords, I can look back and say with relative certainty that almost everyone in the Department who read my initial proposals must have recognized that the scope of the intended project was a bit ridiculous. These same people had equal confidence that as I progressed through the material, I would be able to redirect focus on aspects that would not only contribute something relevant to the field, but would allow me to finish the project before it was time to collect a pension! I gratefully acknowledge the Department of Art for its support and encouragement as I worked through the processes of researching, producing and refining this dissertation. I must thank Dr. Janice Helland for her able supervision of my special field examinations. We worked through a changing process together, and navigated it so ii successfully that I emerged with an enthusiastic and inspirational co-supervisor, Janet M. Brooke. Janet’s generosity with her time and her knowledge in the field of Collecting History added immeasurably to the experience: I’m grateful for the many opportunities to dialogue with her throughout the development of this dissertation, and for her constant support and encouragement throughout the process. The project could not have been whittled down to manageable size without her. Dr. Lynda Jessup’s support as co- supervisor is also much appreciated: her insightful reading of my material invigorated my research at a crucial juncture, and the benefits of this are apparent. My extensive research in London could not have been undertaken without the support of a Bader Fellowship. The generosity of Dr. Alfred Bader in establishing this fellowship enabled many opportunities, and I am most grateful. I am also grateful for the support of Canadian Society for Eighteenth Century Studies. As a recipient of the D.W. Smith Fellowship, I was able to conclude my research with a final short trip to London. The necessary navigation of libraries in pursuit of research is always made better when a graduate student has the good fortune to work with people who are as generous and helpful as they are capable. My good fortune began at Queen’s University: many thanks to Rozan Roberts and Nina Boyd of the Art History Library, and to Mary Fraser (ret.) of the Visual Resources unit of the Department of Art. While in London, I was assisted by the staff at a variety of libraries, archives and museums, and would like to thank in particular Mrs. Calista M. Lucy and Dr. Jan Piggott (ret.) of the Dulwich College Archives, and Lynn Young at the British Library, for their help. Val Hoyt at Christie’s New York was also very generous, receiving requests and answering queries. Staff at the Rare Books and Manuscripts room at the British Library, iii the National Art Library (Victoria & Albert Museum), the Sackler Library at Oxford University, the Cambridge University Library, and at the Library at the Art Gallery of Ontario are also to be thanked for their assistance. Mentors and friends have all provided much needed support, encouragement, and sometimes the welcome distractions: I could not have embarked on this project without some of them, and could not have completed it without others. They all have my profound thanks and my gratitude. J. Douglas Stewart, for sharing his great love of the arts in Britain, and his passion for learning and the power of anecdote. Carol Gibson Wood, for encouraging me in my first critical readings of Horace Walpole and George Vertue a decade ago at the University of Victoria. Catherine Harding, Sally Hickson and Sharon Gregory, for providing me with opportunities to share parts of this thesis at conference sessions in recent years, and to discover the joy of discussing my work with others. Victoria Pollard, my oldest friend and strongest supporter, for intoning a steady refrain of encouragement from the beginning: Coraggio! Allison and Joan Sherman, for their boundless kindness and generosity, and, frequently, the roof over my head! Peter Coffman and Diane Laundy, for always forging their own path and setting the greatest example by it. Roger and Meow Brook, for always making me feel so at home in theirs. Michelle Brook, Sonia Dubon, Jane Russell Corbett and Stan Corbett, Kristy Holmes, Angela Roberts, Andrea Bubenik, Krystina Stermole, Noah Kelly, Graham Brown—you have all helped make this possibility a reality. Finally, my family: Gerry and Judy Campbell, and Lt. Col. and Mrs. W. B. Asbury, for being there from Day One, and helping every step of the way. iv Dedicated to the memory of J. Douglas Stewart (1934-2008). My best times at Queen’s were spent in your classroom and around your dinner table—a generous teacher and kind host, always. It was my great fortune to have been one of your students, and the experience continues to inspire me. v Table of Contents Abstract i Acknowledgments ii Dedication v Table of Contents vi List of Illustrations viii Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review 1 Chapter Two: Presence, Absence, and Narratives of Loss: Robert Walpole (1676-1745) and the Collection at Houghton Hall 48 Chapter Three: Noel Desenfans (1744/5-1807), Francis Bourgeois (c.1756- 1811), and the Problem of Negotiated Ownership 109 Chapter Four: Continuing Strategies of Negotiation 156 Chapter Five: The Old Servants’ Old Masters: The Collection of Joshua Reynolds (1723-1792) 192 Chapter Six: Conclusion 210 Bibliography: 216 Appendix A: Letter from Horace Walpole to George Montagu 232 Appendix B: Parliamentary Speech of John Wilkes, 8 April 1777 235 Appendix C: Prospectus for John Boydell’s Houghton Gallery 241 Appendix D: Noel Desenfans’s Plan for a National Gallery 242 Appendix E: Newspaper Clipping on the Orléans Collection 277 Appendix F: Letter from an Anonymous Painter to Noel Desenfans 279 Appendix G: Letter from Noel Desenfans to Benjamin West 301 Appendix H: Satirical News Item related to ‘Ralph’s Exhibition’ 320 vi Appendix I: Letter from Joshua Reynolds to William Cribb 322 vii List of Illustrations Fig. 1. Dedication Page to Catherine the Great, from John Boydell’s Houghton Gallery. 1788. 84 Fig. 2. S.F. Ravenet after Carlo Dolci, Saint John, for John Boydell, 1780. 89 Fig. 3. S.F. Ravenet after Carlo Dolci, Saint John, for John Boydell, 1780. Detail of Inscription. 90 viii Chapter One: Introduction and Literature Review In 1761, Horace Walpole (1717-1797), 4th Earl of Orford, penned a letter to his friend, George Montagu, detailing a recent exchange with painter and engraver William Hogarth in the artist’s Leicester Fields’ studio, on the matter of literary projects in which each was engaged at the time. Walpole was in the throes of assembling and compiling his Anecdotes of Painting in England; Hogarth was planning an Apology for Painters.
Recommended publications
  • The Paintings and Sculpture Given to the Nation by Mr. Kress and Mr
    e. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THE COLLECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART \YASHINGTON The National Gallery will open to the public on March 18, 1941. For the first time, the Mellon Collection, deeded to the Nation in 1937, and the Kress Collection, given in 1939, will be shown. Both collections are devoted exclusively to painting and sculpture. The Mellon Collection covers the principal European schools from about the year 1200 to the early XIX Century, and includes also a number of early American portraits. The Kress Collection exhibits only Italian painting and sculpture and illustrates the complete development of the Italian schools from the early XIII Century in Florence, Siena, and Rome to the last creative moment in Venice at the end of the XVIII Century. V.'hile these two great collections will occupy a large number of galleries, ample space has been left for future development. Mr. Joseph E. Videner has recently announced that the Videner Collection is destined for the National Gallery and it is expected that other gifts will soon be added to the National Collection. Even at the present time, the collections in scope and quality will make the National Gallery one of the richest treasure houses of art in the wor 1 d. The paintings and sculpture given to the Nation by Mr. Kress and Mr. Mellon have been acquired from some of -2- the most famous private collections abroad; the Dreyfus Collection in Paris, the Barberini Collection in Rome, the Benson Collection in London, the Giovanelli Collection in Venice, to mention only a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Something, and Have Reduced an Annual Charge of Near Twelve Hun- Dred a Year,12 the Consequences of Which I Believe Were As Much
    142 To LADY OSSORY I SEPTEMBER 1773 something, and have reduced an annual charge of near twelve hun­ dred a year,12 the consequences of which I believe were as much more, I mean the waste made and occasioned by bad servants, dogs and horses, still I very much doubt whether I must not resign, from causes not proper for a letter.^ In the shock and vexation of such a scene was I forced to act as if my mind was not only perfectly at ease, but as if I, who never understood one useful thing in my days, was master of every country business, and qualified to be a surveyor-general. Though you would have pitied my sensations, you would have smiled, Madam, I am sure, at my occupations, which lasted without interruption from nine every morning till twelve at night, except that, a few times, I stole from the steward14 and lawyer15 I carried with me, to peep at a room full of painters,16 who you and Lord Ossory will like to hear, are making drawings from the whole collection, which Boydell1? is going to engrave.18 Well, the morning was spent in visiting the ken­ nels, in giving away pointers, greyhounds and foreign beasts, in writing down genealogies of horses—with all my heraldry I never thought to be the Anstis10 of Newmarket—in selling bullocks, sheep, 12. See the itemized list, total reduc­ to advance the polite arts of painting and tion £1189 25., in HW to Thomas Walpole engraving, than any man in this kingdom, 4 Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Anya Gallaccio
    ANYA GALLACCIO Born Paisley, Scotland 1963 Lives London, United Kingdom EDUCATION 1985 Kingston Polytechnic, London, United Kingdom 1988 Goldsmiths' College, University of London, London, United Kingdom SOLO EXHIBITIONS 2019 NOW, The Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh, Scotland Stroke, Blum and Poe, Los Angeles, CA 2018 dreamed about the flowers that hide from the light, Lindisfarne Castle, Northumberland, United Kingdom All the rest is silence, John Hansard Gallery, Southampton, United Kingdom 2017 Beautiful Minds, Thomas Dane Gallery, London, United Kingdom 2015 Silas Marder Gallery, Bridgehampton, NY Lehmann Maupin, New York, NY Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego, San Diego, CA 2014 Aldeburgh Music, Snape Maltings, Saxmundham, Suffolk, United Kingdom Blum and Poe, Los Angeles, CA 2013 ArtPace, San Antonio, TX 2011 Thomas Dane Gallery, London, United Kingdom Annet Gelink, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2010 Unknown Exhibition, The Eastshire Museums in Scotland, Kilmarnock, United Kingdom Annet Gelink Gallery, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2009 So Blue Coat, Liverpool, United Kingdom 2008 Camden Art Centre, London, United Kingdom 2007 Three Sheets to the wind, Thomas Dane Gallery, London, United Kingdom 2006 Galeria Leme, São Paulo, Brazil One art, Sculpture Center, New York, NY 2005 The Look of Things, Palazzo delle Papesse, Siena, Italy Blum and Poe, Los Angeles, CA Silver Seed, Mount Stuart Trust, Isle of Bute, Scotland 2004 Love is Only a Feeling, Lehmann Maupin, New York, NY 2003 Love is only a feeling, Turner Prize Exhibition,
    [Show full text]
  • Norfolk TALES Don Jolly Uses Two Wooded Club Sites As Bases from Which to Uncover a Host of East Anglian Attractions
    CLUB SITES THE SANDRINGHAM ESTATE & THE COVERT Norfolk TALES Don Jolly uses two wooded Club sites as bases from which to uncover a host of East Anglian attractions T FIRST glance, the Club’s two A shop reached along a tree-lined Snettisham, found on The Wash, is a quayside, the Custom House. Nearby If that sounds too energetic, you can There can’t be many caravan sites with Not to be missed: west Norfolk sites – The footpath offers basic foodstuffs, while must for all self-respecting birdwatchers. stands a statue of local lad Captain relax on ‘Sunny Hunny’s’ sandy beach a Second World War armoured vehicle at a mass take-off at Snettisham RSPB Sandringham Estate and The nearby West Newton’s village store sells One of the natural world’s spectacular George Vancouver, famous for exploring backed by red and white ‘layer cake’ cliffs, the entrance, but that’s what you’ll find A reserve Covert – appear very similar. Both lie meat from the royal estate. More down- sights is the mass take-off of thousands of North America’s Pacific coast. visit the Sea Life Sanctuary or take a boat at The Covert. ‘Little Audrey’, a within forest, but closer inspection reveals to-earth, the mobile Village Fryer calls on wading birds as the tide approaches. Miss A quarter of an hour away by car, Castle trip to view seal colonies. Beyond Cromwell tank, commemorates the five ❖ important differences. Monday, Wednesday and Friday evenings the moment and you could console yourself Rising has a superb Norman castle, while, Hunstanton, Norfolk’s north coast has months members of the 7th Armoured Most obviously, Sandringham is handy with fish and chips.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Reynolds's “Nice Chymistry”: Action and Accident in the 1770S Matthew C
    This article was downloaded by: [McGill University Library] On: 06 May 2015, At: 11:53 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK The Art Bulletin Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rcab20 Joshua Reynolds's “Nice Chymistry”: Action and Accident in the 1770s Matthew C. Hunter Published online: 03 Mar 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: Matthew C. Hunter (2015) Joshua Reynolds's “Nice Chymistry”: Action and Accident in the 1770s, The Art Bulletin, 97:1, 58-76, DOI: 10.1080/00043079.2014.943125 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2014.943125 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • Given a Free Rein? Representations of Power in the Stables at Houghton Hall, Norfolk, and John Wootton's Sir Robert Walpole Wi
    VIDES III JEMIMA HUBBERSTEY Given a free rein? Representations of power in the stables at Houghton Hall, Norfolk, and John Wootton’s Sir Robert Walpole with his Hunter and Groom When Sir Robert Walpole first rose to political power from humble origins, he had much to prove to the world. In order to consolidate his position as Prime Minister against the backdrop of the new Hanoverian dynasty, Walpole capitalised on extravagant displays of power, impressing political peers and local squires alike by inviting them for entertainment and hunting at his estate at Houghton Hall, Norfolk. This was hardly coincidental: although relatively unexplored in scholarship, historically, horses served as vehicles to showcase a man’s elite social standing and ability to govern. However, it was also important for Walpole to recognise the limits of his power in order to demonstrate that he was no threat to the monarchy. This study examines the stable architecture at Houghton Hall and the equestrian portrait of Walpole by John Wootton (1726) in order to demonstrate the extent to which equestrian representations could function as a metaphor for both power and submission, which is particularly pertinent when applied to the hierarchical relations between Prime Minister and King. riting to the Prince of Wales on July 14, 1731, Lord Hervey would remark that Sir Robert Walpole’s Houghton Hall in Norfolk was a paradigm of W‘taste, expense, state and parade.’1 This comment in itself is perhaps unsurprising – country houses, after all, have always been about display, founded and embellished as part of a conscious mission to establish a dynastic ‘line’.2 However, what makes this comment so interesting in Walpole’s case is that as the first Prime Minister, Walpole was essentially a commoner who had risen to power.
    [Show full text]
  • Lot and His Daughters Pen and Brown Ink and Brown Wash, with Traces of Framing Lines in Brown Ink
    Giovanni Francesco Barbieri GUERCINO (Cento 1591 - Bologna 1666) Lot and his Daughters Pen and brown ink and brown wash, with traces of framing lines in brown ink. Laid down on an 18th century English mount, inscribed Guercino at the bottom. Numbered 544. at the upper right of the mount. 180 x 235 mm. (7 1/8 x 8 7/8 in.) This drawing is a preparatory compositional study for one of the most significant works of Guercino’s early career; the large canvas of Lot and His Daughters painted in 1617 for Cardinal Alessandro Ludovisi, the archbishop of Bologna and later Pope Gregory XV, and today in the monastery of San Lorenzo at El Escorial, near Madrid. This was one of three paintings commissioned from Guercino by Cardinal Ludovisi executed in 1617, the others being a Return of the Prodigal Son and a Susanna and the Elders. The Lot and His Daughters is recorded in inventories of the Villa Ludovisi in Rome in 1623 and 1633, but in 1664 both it and the Susanna and the Elders were presented by Prince Niccolò Ludovisi, nephew of Gregory XV, to King Phillip IV of Spain. The two paintings were placed in the Escorial, where the Lot and His Daughters remains today, while the Susanna and the Elders was transferred in 1814 to the Palacio Real in Madrid and is now in the Prado. Painted when the artist was in his late twenties, the Lot and his Daughters is thought to have been the first of the four Ludovisi pictures to be painted by Guercino.
    [Show full text]
  • The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): an Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2003 The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment Terrance Gerard Galvin University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Architecture Commons, European History Commons, Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Galvin, Terrance Gerard, "The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment" (2003). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 996. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/996 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/996 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Architecture of Joseph Michael Gandy (1771-1843) and Sir John Soane (1753-1837): An Exploration Into the Masonic and Occult Imagination of the Late Enlightenment Abstract In examining select works of English architects Joseph Michael Gandy and Sir John Soane, this dissertation is intended to bring to light several important parallels between architectural theory and freemasonry during the late Enlightenment. Both architects developed architectural theories regarding the universal origins of architecture in an attempt to establish order as well as transcend the emerging historicism of the early nineteenth century. There are strong parallels between Soane's use of architectural narrative and his discussion of architectural 'model' in relation to Gandy's understanding of 'trans-historical' architecture. The primary textual sources discussed in this thesis include Soane's Lectures on Architecture, delivered at the Royal Academy from 1809 to 1836, and Gandy's unpublished treatise entitled the Art, Philosophy, and Science of Architecture, circa 1826.
    [Show full text]
  • FRAMING the MUSEUM the Evolution of the Museum As an Encoded Site of Interpretation and Display by Craig Judd
    Framing the Museum Craig Judd OPENING ADDRESS FOCUS FEST 2000, November 10, AGNSW FRAMING THE MUSEUM the evolution of the museum as an encoded site of interpretation and display by Craig Judd There are many codes that swirl around the museum. There are codes that relate to the creation of culture, history and tradition. There are codes that relate to the activities and roles of the artist. There are also codes that relate to language and the senses. While adopting a broad historical framework for this text, there will be a concentration on explaining some of the experiences that we can gain in the contemporary art environment, more specifically the contemporary art museum. Another framework for this text is a journey through the history of art. I touch upon prehistoric acts of collection, to ideas of treasure and its holding place -the treasury, then to often-quirky private collections, the rooms of wonders and curiosities (Wunderkammer or Kunstkammern). There is also mention of the development of private collections that have a more scientific basis but the main concentration is the realm of the public museum. In the last 30 years hundreds of museums have been built. There are many different types of museum as there are different types of history. In Australia there are buildings that house the local historical societies collections to more commercial enterprises like the Ned Kelly Museum at Glenrowan in Victoria. There are historic houses such as Norman Lindsay’s home in Springwood or the more recently built Bundanon studio complex donated by Arthur Boyd to the people of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • The State Hermitage Museum Annual Report 2012
    THE STATE HERMITAGE MUSEUM ANNUAL REPORT n 2012 CONTENTS General Editor 4 Year of Village and Garden Mikhail Piotrovsky, General Director of the State Hermitage Museum, 6 State Hermitage Museum. General Information Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 16 Awards Full Member of the Russian Academy of Arts, Professor of St. Petersburg State University, 20 Composition of the Hermitage Collection as of 1 January 2013 Doctor of History 40 Exhibitions 86 Restoration and Conservation 121 Publications EDITORIAL BOARD: 135 Electronic Editions and Video Films Mikhail Piotrovsky, 136 Conferences General Director of the State Hermitage Museum 141 Dissertations Georgy Vilinbakhov, 142 Archaeological Expeditions Deputy Director for Research 158 Major Construction and Restoration of the Buildings Svetlana Adaksina, Deputy Director, Chief Curator 170 Structure of Visits to the State Hermitage in 2012 Marina Antipova, 171 Educational Events Deputy Director for Finance and Planning 180 Special Development Programmes Alexey Bogdanov, Deputy Director for Maintenance 188 International Advisory Board of the State Hermitage Museum Vladimir Matveyev, 190 Guests of the Hermitage Deputy Director for Exhibitions and Development 194 Hermitage Friends Organisations Mikhail Novikov, 204 Hermitage Friends’ Club Deputy Director for Construction 206 Financial Statements of the State Hermitage Museum Mariam Dandamayeva, Academic Secretary 208 Principal Patrons and Sponsors of the State Hermitage Museum in 2012 Yelena Zvyagintseva, 210 Staff Members of
    [Show full text]
  • John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery and the Promotion of a National Aesthetic
    JOHN BOYDELL'S SHAKESPEARE GALLERY AND THE PROMOTION OF A NATIONAL AESTHETIC ROSEMARIE DIAS TWO VOLUMES VOLUME I PHD THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2003 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Volume I Abstract 3 List of Illustrations 4 Introduction 11 I Creating a Space for English Art 30 II Reynolds, Boydell and Northcote: Negotiating the Ideology 85 of the English Aesthetic. III "The Shakespeare of the Canvas": Fuseli and the 154 Construction of English Artistic Genius IV "Another Hogarth is Known": Robert Smirke's Seven Ages 203 of Man and the Construction of the English School V Pall Mall and Beyond: The Reception and Consumption of 244 Boydell's Shakespeare after 1793 290 Conclusion Bibliography 293 Volume II Illustrations 3 ABSTRACT This thesis offers a new analysis of John Boydell's Shakespeare Gallery, an exhibition venture operating in London between 1789 and 1805. It explores a number of trajectories embarked upon by Boydell and his artists in their collective attempt to promote an English aesthetic. It broadly argues that the Shakespeare Gallery offered an antidote to a variety of perceived problems which had emerged at the Royal Academy over the previous twenty years, defining itself against Academic theory and practice. Identifying and examining the cluster of spatial, ideological and aesthetic concerns which characterised the Shakespeare Gallery, my research suggests that the Gallery promoted a vision for a national art form which corresponded to contemporary senses of English cultural and political identity, and takes issue with current art-historical perceptions about the 'failure' of Boydell's scheme. The introduction maps out some of the existing scholarship in this area and exposes the gaps which art historians have previously left in our understanding of the Shakespeare Gallery.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Illustrations Plates P1
    LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS PLATES P1. I (frontispiece) retouched photograph: approximate reconstruction of the original state of Rembrandt's 'Anatomy of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp' (so called), 1632. London, Wellcome Institute. P1. 2 Rembrandt van Rijn, 'The anatomy (or "anatomy lesson"') of Dr. Nicolaes Tulp' (so called), oil painting, 1632, bears signature and date probably painted over autograph signature and date; with alterations by Rembrandt and more than one other hand. The Hague, Mauritshuis. P1. 3 Aert Pietersz., 'The anatomy (or "anatomy lesson") of Dr. Sebastiaen Egbertsz.' (so called), oil painting, signed with monogram and dated 1603. Amsterdam, Amsterdams Historisch Museum, currently exhibited at the Geschiedkundig Medisch-Pharmaceutisch Museum, Amsterdam. P1. 4 Michiel and Pieter van Miereveld, 'The anatomy (or "anatomy lesson") of Dr. Willem van der Meer' (so called), oil painting, signed and dated 1617. Delft, Oude en Nieuwe Gasthuis. P1. 5 Thomas de Keyser, 'The anatomy (or "anatomy lesson") of Dr. Sebastiaen Egbertsz.' (so called), oil painting, 1619. Amsterdam, Amsterdams Historisch Museum. P1. 6 Nicolaes Eliasz. (called Pickenoy), 'The anatomy (or "anatomy lesson") of Dr. Johan Fonteyn' (so called), oil painting, 1625. Central part (only surviv- ing fragment). Amsterdam, Amsterdams Historisch Museum. PI. 7 a demonstration of the anatomy of the upper limb at Grant medical college, Bombay, anonymous photograph, late nineteenth century. London, British Library (India Office Library and Archives). P1. 8 an anatomy at the Leiden anatomy-theatre, anonymous engraving, 1609, after a drawing by J. C. van 't Woudt (Woudanus). Amsterdam, Rijksprentenkabinet. P1. 9 dissection of the forearm. Detail from Rembrandt's so-called 'Anatomy of Dr.
    [Show full text]