DOCSLIB.ORG

United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON SUPERHUMAN ACTIVITIES STUDY GUIDE Yavuz Ülker Yiğit Ülker Under-Secretary-General Secretary-General Vefa Lisesi Model United Nations Conference March 31st – April 3rd, 2017 Istanbul, Turkey LETTER FROM UNDER SECRETARY-GENERAL Most distinguished delegates of the United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities, It is my utmost honour and supreme pleasure to welcome you all to the very first session of Vefa Lisesi Model United Nations Conference 2017. I will be serving as the responsible Under Secretary General of United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities (UNCSA). To very shortly introduce myself, my name is Yavuz Ülker, I am currently a senior in Cağaloğlu Anadolu Lisesi. This will be my fifth very joyful and successful year of doing MUN and I am proud to participate in this year’s VefaMUN. With the concept of fictional committees in MUN Conferences becoming more and more preferable, this year’s VefaMUN decided to host a committee in a similar aspect. Having realized my personal interest both in comics and in global politics, I have got together with the Secretariat to craft an ambiance that will allow its participants to debate professionally and have fun simultaneously. The expectations I have from the delegates in this committee to firstly do their research well. The Study Guide is a great material to begin with but by no means to limit your research. Since we will be simulating a committee that is set in an alternate reality, I recommend you to expand your imagination, think beyond politics and expect the unexpected. Apart from the work, VefaMUN will be an amazing conference for all of us. Observing the enthusiasm and diligence of the Academic and the Organization Team, it is easy to say that we all are going to leave the conference with a vast amount of aspiration. I would like to stress my thanks to the Secretariat and the Secretary-General himself. It was surely a hard process to create such an extensive Study Guide for the conference. Despite working in harsh circumstances, we dealt with all subjects and prepared the Study Guide you are reading now. I am looking forward to seeing you all, living the extremity of joy together, and saving the world while starting long-lasting friendships. Yavuz Ülker Under-Secretary-General responsible for United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities 1 1) Introduction 2) Definition of Key Terms 3) United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities 4) Fictional Universe a. General Overview i. World War II Era ii. Post-War Era iii. Modern Day b. Timeline of Events 5) Superhuman Regulation Protocol a. Background b. The Problem of Vigilantism and the Avengers 6) Conclusion 7) Further Readings, Recommended Media & Useful Links This document is based on characters and events published by Marvel Comics and prepared with the purpose of explaining the working of this committee. No copyright infringement is intended. 2 “With great power, there must also come great responsibility.” - Benjamin Parker 3 Introduction For many years, the fictional world of superheroes and their adventures have become a big area of interest for many people. The concept of heroism was brought to pages with different kinds of people showing different kinds of powers, therefore creating an ideal world presenting what people could do when they scrape themselves from negativity and unite to solve a common problem. In that aspect, comic books have started taking the role of reflecting simple circumstances of a normal life by creating dilemmas among the fictional characters, bringing people together and presenting many concepts such as love, friendship, war, fear and so on. Displaying the good nature of heroes and their accomplishments in their early times, comic books have changed their attributes throughout the years as a result of global shift. Getting more and more realistic by nature, the books changed the qualities of our heroes as they found themselves in global crises, intergalactic wars, political issues and social unrest. The enemy was nowhere to be seen anymore as it used to be; there were now many different threats which could instantly turn into big problems, threats that our heroes could not overcome only with physical showdowns. In a dark and gritty world, compromising was not something they could run away from. Friends clashed with friends, societies plunged into fear and compelling villains arose. The line that separates the good from the bad, the right from the wrong and the hero from the villain started to get blurry. Consequently, the perception of heroism has experienced a paradigm transformation and necessity of such acts got questioned. Possessing tremendous abilities and powers have become controversial in society. People who managed to dodge the consequences of their actions and do not face the proper judgment for them have come into the focus of the global authorities. Heroism found itself mixed with vigilantism and a clear distinction was absent. Resultantly, having a superpower turned into a worriment rather than what their bearers choose to do with them. Because each individual with these powers was now a threat, not an embodiment of hope once they used to be. Is it genuinely possible to see such great power free from great responsibility? What kind of a morality can we talk about if we do not deal with the outcomes of our acts? Because heroism today is lack of such view of liability considering that super-powered people operate candidly for their own personal agendas or against what they call “common threats” such as public villains; since they leave a huge trail of destruction behind them, ignore sovereign borders and feel no obligation to look back. In this context, this problem itself is situated within the shifting dynamics of international responsibility and political instability.1 1 Backe, Emma Louise. “The Politics of Peace in Captain America: Civil War”. The Geek Anthropologist. https://thegeekanthropologist.com/2016/05/19/the-politics-of-peace-in-captain-america-civil-war/ 4 This urge to control and oversight enhanced individuals come with a greater obstacle: trampling civil liberties in order to achieve security. “The issue has generally been portrayed in broad terms as being a debate between the rights of the individual (to freedom of action and expression etc.) on one side versus the rights of society at large (to safety from danger or harm) on the other. Does the super-powered individual (mutant or otherwise) have an absolute right to their abilities or does society have a right to constrain or at least monitor them and their expression of those abilities?”2 This particular problem has become the main argument of this fictional committee as it contains elements of international diplomacy and has the potential to cause contradictions among many individuals as well as authorities, which creates a splendid atmosphere for the delegates to simulate debating and mutual cooperation. It is the definitive goal of this committee to sustain professional dialog despite oppositions and to preserve an agreement that binds all the parties involved in this problem. 2 http://marvel.wikia.com/wiki/Registration_Acts 5 Definition of Key Terms enhanced individual: An enhanced individual or a superhuman is a legal adult who possesses at least one skill, power, ability, talent, biomechanical improvement or enhanced weaponry that provide capabilities far beyond the range attainable by normal human beings. The mentioned powers and skills can be both inborn or later acquired through experimentation, mutation, genetic alterations or extraterrestrial elements. For instance, an athlete is a normal human in extraordinary physical condition, such as a weightlifter or boxer. A peak human is a person who keeps his bodily functions at the maximum level of human condition, meaning that the person is fast enough to catch-up a moving vehicle or hold his/her breath underwater for minutes. But a person who can lift a car or fly is considered as a superhuman. vigilante: A vigilante is often described as a person who commits an act as a law enforcer without any legal authority. Groups or individuals who execute vigilant activities often try to justify their actions by claiming that legal agencies are insufficient. Violence is a common element in vigilantism. mutant (homo superior): A mutant is someone whose genetic feature allows him/her to naturally develop superhuman abilities. Mutants are born with a genetic oddity called X-gene and manifest their abilities during puberty. atlantean (homo mermanus): The race of aquatic humanoids who reside in the lost city of Atlantis. The total population of homo mermanus has been estimated at over 1,000,000 globally. paramilitary organization: An organization with a partly militarized force. Paramilitary organizations share similarities with professional militaries but often not listed in any state’s formal armed forces.3 collateral damage: A general term for deaths, injuries, or other damage inflicted on an unintended target.4 3 "paramilitary". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. June 2011 4 https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/collateral%20damage 6 United Nations Commission on Superhuman Activities The Commission on Superhuman Activities is an intergovernmental body acting concurrently with the United Nations General Assembly and the Security Council. It is exclusively dedicated to providing oversight and regulation for the deployment of enhanced individuals with the purpose of reducing regional and international incidents. The Commission addresses emerging issues, focus areas and new approaches to questions affecting the situation of superheroes, that require timely consideration. The outcomes and recommendations of each session are forwarded to Security Council for follow-up. Consisting of 8 member parties, the Commission works with both member states and global non-state actors such as the Avengers, SHIELD and the X-Men. Apart from previous years and sessions, the Commission is going to be responsible for implementing the newly written Superhuman Regulation Protocol (SRP) which will establish the registration process of superpowered individuals and group as well as supervising their actions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Uncanny X-Men: Days of Future Past Free
    FREE THE UNCANNY X-MEN: DAYS OF FUTURE PAST PDF Chris Claremont,John Byrne,John Romita | 204 pages | 10 Apr 2006 | Panini Publishing Ltd | 9781904419938 | English | Dartford, United Kingdom Days of Future Past - Wikipedia Goodreads helps you keep track of books you The Uncanny X-Men: Days of Future Past to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions. Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Preview — X-Men by Chris Claremont. Terry Kevin Austin Inker. Glynis Wein Colorist. Relive the legendary first journey into the dystopian future of where Sentinels stalk the Earth and the X-Men are humanity's only hope Also featuring the first apperance of Alpha Flight, the return of the Wendigo, the history of Cyclops Get A Copy. Paperbackpages. Published June 7th by Marvel first published More Details Original Title. Other Editions Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about X-Menplease sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 4. Rating details. More filters. Sort order. One of the strongest X- Men stories ever This edition not only include the main story "Days of Future Past" but also several issues before and after of the story. So, my rating is an overall average based on the sum of all individual ratings per story. Here I sit Now, for the first time, I realize how it must have been for the Professor all these long months This is an astonishing account of the major events of the X-Men history since its beginning to date narrated by not other than Scott Summers aka Cyclops! Told from his personal point of view, he takes the audience in an uncanny journey through the happiest and saddest moments.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetics and Other Human Modification Technologies: Sensible International Regulation Or a New Kind of Arms Race?
    GENETICS AND OTHER HUMAN MODIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES: SENSIBLE INTERNATIONAL REGULATION OR A NEW KIND OF ARMS RACE? HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON TERRORISM, NONPROLIFERATION, AND TRADE OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED TENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 19, 2008 Serial No. 110–201 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 43–068PDF WASHINGTON : 2008 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOWARD L. BERMAN, California, Chairman GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey Samoa DAN BURTON, Indiana DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey ELTON GALLEGLY, California BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California ROBERT WEXLER, Florida DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York EDWARD R. ROYCE, California BILL DELAHUNT, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York THOMAS G. TANCREDO, Colorado DIANE E. WATSON, California RON PAUL, Texas ADAM SMITH, Washington JEFF FLAKE, Arizona RUSS CARNAHAN, Missouri MIKE PENCE, Indiana JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee JOE WILSON, South Carolina GENE GREEN, Texas JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas CONNIE MACK, Florida RUBE´ N HINOJOSA, Texas JEFF FORTENBERRY, Nebraska JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas DAVID WU, Oregon TED POE, Texas BRAD MILLER, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina LINDA T.
    [Show full text]
  • Superhuman Enhancements Via Implants: Beyond the Human Mind
    philosophies Article Superhuman Enhancements via Implants: Beyond the Human Mind Kevin Warwick Office of the Vice Chancellor, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; [email protected] Received: 16 June 2020; Accepted: 7 August 2020; Published: 10 August 2020 Abstract: In this article, a practical look is taken at some of the possible enhancements for humans through the use of implants, particularly into the brain or nervous system. Some cognitive enhancements may not turn out to be practically useful, whereas others may turn out to be mere steps on the way to the construction of superhumans. The emphasis here is the focus on enhancements that take such recipients beyond the human norm rather than any implantations employed merely for therapy. This is divided into what we know has already been tried and tested and what remains at this time as more speculative. Five examples from the author’s own experimentation are described. Each case is looked at in detail, from the inside, to give a unique personal experience. The premise is that humans are essentially their brains and that bodies serve as interfaces between brains and the environment. The possibility of building an Interplanetary Creature, having an intelligence and possibly a consciousness of its own, is also considered. Keywords: human–machine interaction; implants; upgrading humans; superhumans; brain–computer interface 1. Introduction The future life of superhumans with fantastic abilities has been extensively investigated in philosophy, literature and film. Despite this, the concept of human enhancement can often be merely directed towards the individual, particularly someone who is deemed to have a disability, the idea being that the enhancement brings that individual back to some sort of human norm.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disappearing Human: Gnostic Dreams in a Transhumanist World
    religions Article The Disappearing Human: Gnostic Dreams in a Transhumanist World Jeffrey C. Pugh Department of Religious Studies, Elon University, Elon, NC 27244-2020, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Noreen Herzfeld Received: 25 January 2017; Accepted: 18 April 2017; Published: 3 May 2017 Abstract: Transhumanism is dedicated to freeing humankind from the limitations of biological life, creating new bodies that will carry us into the future. In seeking freedom from the constraints of nature, it resembles ancient Gnosticism, but complicates the question of what the human being is. In contrast to the perspective that we are our brains, I argue that human consciousness and subjectivity originate from complex interactions between the body and the surrounding environment. These qualities emerge from a distinct set of structural couplings embodied within multiple organ systems and the multiplicity of connections within the brain. These connections take on different forms, including structural, chemical, and electrical manifestations within the totality of the human body. This embodiment suggests that human consciousness, and the intricate levels of experience that accompany it, cannot be replicated in non-organic forms such as computers or synaptic implants without a significant loss to human identity. The Gnostic desire to escape our embodiment found in transhumanism carries the danger of dissolving the human being. Keywords: Singularity; transhumanism; Merleau-Ponty; Kurzweil; Gnosticism; AI; emergence; technology 1. Introduction In 1993, the mathematician and science fiction writer Vernor Vinge gave a talk at the Vision 21 symposium sponsored by NASA introducing the idea of the Singularity, an evolutionary moment when we would create the capacity for superhuman intelligence that would transcend the human and take us into the posthuman world (Vinge 1993).
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation*
    Transhumanism Between Human Enhancement and Technological Innovation* Ion Iuga Abstract: Transhumanism introduces from its very beginning a paradigm shift about concepts like human nature, progress and human future. An overview of its ideology reveals a strong belief in the idea of human enhancement through technologically means. The theory of technological singularity, which is more or less a radicalisation of the transhumanist discourse, foresees a radical evolutionary change through artificial intelligence. The boundaries between intelligent machines and human beings will be blurred. The consequence is the upcoming of a post-biological and posthuman future when intelligent technology becomes autonomous and constantly self-improving. Considering these predictions, I will investigate here the way in which the idea of human enhancement modifies our understanding of technological innovation. I will argue that such change goes in at least two directions. On the one hand, innovation is seen as something that will inevitably lead towards intelligent machines and human enhancement. On the other hand, there is a direction such as “Singularity University,” where innovation is called to pragmatically solving human challenges. Yet there is a unifying spirit which holds together the two directions and I think it is the same transhumanist idea. Keywords: transhumanism, technological innovation, human enhancement, singularity Each of your smartphones is more powerful than the fastest supercomputer in the world of 20 years ago. (Kathryn Myronuk) If you understand the potential of these exponential technologies to transform everything from energy to education, you have different perspective on how we can solve the grand challenges of humanity. (Ray Kurzweil) We seek to connect a humanitarian community of forward-thinking people in a global movement toward an abundant future (Singularity University, Impact report 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Nietzsche and Transhumanism Nietzsche Now Series
    Nietzsche and Transhumanism Nietzsche Now Series Cambridge Scholars Publishing Editors: Stefan Lorenz Sorgner and Yunus Tuncel Editorial Board: Keith Ansell-Pearson, Rebecca Bamford, Nicholas Birns, David Kilpatrick, Vanessa Lemm, Iain Thomson, Paul van Tongeren, and Ashley Woodward If you are interested in publishing in this series, please send your inquiry to the editors Stefan Lorenz Sorgner at [email protected] and Yunus Tuncel at [email protected] Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? Edited by Yunus Tuncel Nietzsche and Transhumanism: Precursor or Enemy? Series: Nietzsche Now Edited by Yunus Tuncel This book first published 2017 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2017 by Yunus Tuncel and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7287-3 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-7287-4 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Yunus Tuncel Part I Chapter One ............................................................................................... 14 Nietzsche, the Overhuman, and Transhumanism Stefan Lorenz Sorgner
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America
    Voces Novae Volume 11 Article 3 2019 Engineering Mankind: The oS ciopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/vocesnovae Part of the American Politics Commons, Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Lee, Megan (2019) "Engineering Mankind: The ocS iopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America," Voces Novae: Vol. 11, Article 3. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Voces Novae by an authorized editor of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Lee: Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Engineering Mankind: The Sociopolitical Impact of Eugenics in America Megan Lee “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…Three generations of imbeciles are enough.”1 This statement was made by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. while presenting the court’s majority opinion on the sterilization of a seventeen-year old girl in 1927. The concept of forced sterilization emerged during the American Eugenics Movement of the early 20th century. In 1909, California became one of the first states to introduce eugenic laws which legalized the forced sterilization of those deemed “feeble-minded.” The victims were mentally ill patients in psychiatric state hospitals, individuals who suffered from epilepsy and autism, and prisoners with criminal convictions, all of whom were forcibly castrated.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanizing the Posthuman in Powers, Wallace, Gibson And
    HUMANIZING THE POSTHUMAN IN POWERS, WALLACE, GIBSON AND DELILLO A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Doctor of Philosophy By Ahmad Ghashmari December 2016 © Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation Written by Ahmad Ghashmari B.A., Yarmouk University, 2006 M.A., Yarmouk University, 2009 M.A., University of Akron, 2015 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2016 Approved by Tammy Clewell_______________, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Robert Trogdon_______________, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Kevin Floyd__________________ Michael Byron________________ Brian Baer___________________ Accepted by Robert Trogdon_______________, Chair, Department of English James L. Blank________________, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences i TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ……………………………………………………………………………..……..ii Introduction………………………………………………………………………….…………….….…..1 Chapter 1: Richard Powers’ Galatea 2.2: Love, Companionship and Boundaries between Humans and Machines………………………………..………………....32 Chapter 2: David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest: Entertainment Technology and the Reclaiming of the Human………………….………………………………………….60 Chapter 3: William Gibson’s Pattern Recognition: Finding Human Agency in a Commodified Techno-Culture……….……………………………..……………....89 Chapter 4: The Illusion of Transhuman Immortality and the Importance of the Self…………………………..…………………….………….……………………………….122 Conclusion: Towards a New Understanding of Posthumanism………………………….151 Works Cited…………………………………………….……………….………………………………….156 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am immensely grateful to my dissertation director, Tammy Clewell, for her encouragement and patience. I would not have been able to complete this study without her guidance, valuable feedback and suggestions. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee members, Dr. Robert Trogdon, Dr. Kevin Floyd and Dr. Michael Byron for their feedback and interesting questions during the defense, the candidacy exams and the prospectus defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Vs. Posthuman Author(S): James Hughes, Nick Bostrum and Jonathan D
    Human vs. Posthuman Author(s): James Hughes, Nick Bostrum and Jonathan D. Moreno Source: The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 37, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 2007), pp. 4-7 Published by: The Hastings Center Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4625770 Accessed: 26-10-2016 01:22 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms The Hastings Center, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Hastings Center Report This content downloaded from 129.67.119.184 on Wed, 26 Oct 2016 01:22:33 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms letters Human vs. Posthuman To the Editor: In "Whereto Tran- to expand access to enhancement. Dif- able for some posthumans to expunge shumanism? The Literature Reaches a ferences in biology and ability challenge all fellow-feeling for mere humans, or Critical Mass" (May-June 2007), social solidarity, but the Enlightenment for any other persons? Whether local or Nicholas Agar correctly notes that argues for solidarity among equal citi- universal values, ensuring that our de- Simon Young's effort to ground trans- zens irrespective of biological differ- scendents retain capacities for solidarity humanism in a drive to evolve is a non- ences.
    [Show full text]
  • Transhumanism
    T ranshumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T ranshum... Transhumanism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia See also: Outline of transhumanism Transhumanism is an international Part of Ideology series on intellectual and cultural movement supporting Transhumanism the use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical characteristics Ideologies and capacities. The movement regards aspects Abolitionism of the human condition, such as disability, Democratic transhumanism suffering, disease, aging, and involuntary Extropianism death as unnecessary and undesirable. Immortalism Transhumanists look to biotechnologies and Libertarian transhumanism other emerging technologies for these Postgenderism purposes. Dangers, as well as benefits, are Singularitarianism also of concern to the transhumanist Technogaianism [1] movement. Related articles The term "transhumanism" is symbolized by Transhumanism in fiction H+ or h+ and is often used as a synonym for Transhumanist art "human enhancement".[2] Although the first known use of the term dates from 1957, the Organizations contemporary meaning is a product of the 1980s when futurists in the United States Applied Foresight Network Alcor Life Extension Foundation began to organize what has since grown into American Cryonics Society the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist Cryonics Institute thinkers predict that human beings may Foresight Institute eventually be able to transform themselves Humanity+ into beings with such greatly expanded Immortality Institute abilities as to merit the label "posthuman".[1] Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Transhumanism is therefore sometimes Transhumanism Portal · referred to as "posthumanism" or a form of transformational activism influenced by posthumanist ideals.[3] The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Bard Digital Commons Jan2019
    Bard College Bard Digital Commons Robert Kelly Manuscripts Robert Kelly Archive 1-2019 jan2019 Robert Kelly Bard College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/rk_manuscripts Recommended Citation Kelly, Robert, "jan2019" (2019). Robert Kelly Manuscripts. 1415. https://digitalcommons.bard.edu/rk_manuscripts/1415 This Manuscript is brought to you for free and open access by the Robert Kelly Archive at Bard Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Robert Kelly Manuscripts by an authorized administrator of Bard Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. January 2019 1 NEW YEARS LETTER 1. Trying new dangers amoebas in friend rice. We mercenary men goth’d our way west until we unraveled all rhe languages and used them all up. Then pity poor butterfly voiceless as light. 2. As if we selves are selves as pathogens. Dark audience, they collect our dreams and publish them in an anthology called today. January 2019 2 3. Something like that at least. Something is happening to me. Albestone dropped from my hand but not lost, never lost, it glistens in the shadows we call music. 4. See, naming things already, who gave me this near year? The stricture relents, Bach’s English Suites— I would have been a piano if I could, such love I have of touch. January 2019 3 5. Fingers, fingers, not rhyme. Specifics of geographic location— Orpheus in hell, Eurydice’s face at last from that unsilent company. In this age, women have all the lines. 6. This isn’t talking, see, this is lurking in the shadows.
    [Show full text]
  • Superhuman, Transhuman, Post/Human: Mapping the Production and Reception of the Posthuman Body
    Superhuman, Transhuman, Post/Human: Mapping the Production and Reception of the Posthuman Body Scott Jeffery Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling, Scotland, UK September 2013 Declaration I declare that none of the work contained within this thesis has been submitted for any other degree at any other university. The contents found within this thesis have been composed by the candidate Scott Jeffery. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank you, first of all, to my supervisors Dr Ian McIntosh and Dr Sharon Wright for their support and patience. To my brother, for allowing to me to turn several of his kitchens into offices. And to R and R. For everything. ABSTRACT The figure of the cyborg, or more latterly, the posthuman body has been an increasingly familiar presence in a number of academic disciplines. The majority of such studies have focused on popular culture, particularly the depiction of the posthuman in science-fiction, fantasy and horror. To date however, few studies have focused on the posthuman and the comic book superhero, despite their evident corporeality, and none have questioned comics’ readers about their responses to the posthuman body. This thesis presents a cultural history of the posthuman body in superhero comics along with the findings from twenty-five, two-hour interviews with readers. By way of literature reviews this thesis first provides a new typography of the posthuman, presenting it not as a stable bounded subject but as what Deleuze and Guattari (1987) describe as a ‘rhizome’. Within the rhizome of the posthuman body are several discursive plateaus that this thesis names Superhumanism (the representation of posthuman bodies in popular culture), Post/Humanism (a critical-theoretical stance that questions the assumptions of Humanism) and Transhumanism (the philosophy and practice of human enhancement with technology).
    [Show full text]