Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized
RP1030 v1
KAWANDA – MASAKA TRANSMISSION LINE
Project Name: ELECTRICITY SECTOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Project Number: P119737
Report for: RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP)
PREPARATION, REVIEW AND AUTHORISATION
Revision # Date Prepared by Reviewed by Approved for Issue by
ISSUE REGISTER Distribution List Date Issued Number of Copies : April 2011
SMEC staff:
Associates:
Office Library (SMEC office location):
SMEC Project File:
SMEC COMPANY DETAILS
Tel:
Fax:
Email: www.smec.com
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | i
We certify that this Resettlement Action Plan was conducted under our direct supervision and based on the Terms of Reference provided to us by Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. We hereby certify that the particulars given in this report are correct and true to the best of our knowledge. Table 1: RAP Review Team
Resource Designation Signature
Social-Economist/RAP M/s Elizabeth Aisu Specialist/Team leader
Mr. Orena John Charles Registered Surveyor
Mr. Ssali Nicholas Registered Valuer
Mr. Yorokamu Nuwahambasa Sociologist
Mr. Lyadda Nathan Social Worker M/s Julliet Musanyana Social Worker
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
SMEC International wishes to express their gratitude to The Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) team, AFRICAN TECHNOLOGIES (U) Ltd and to all the persons who were consulted for their useful contributions that made the assessment successful. In this regard, Mr. Ian Kyeyune , LC5 Chairman Wakiso, M/s Joan Kironde, the then District Environment Officer Wakiso, M/s. Muniya Fiona, Sector Manager Mpigi, and to all the Local Council Leaders in all the affected Districts and the PAPs M/s Ziria Tibalwa Principal Planning Officer, Mr. John Othieno Principal Environment Officer and the whole Project Team of UETCL as well as all LC Executive of all the villages affected is acknowledged.
Gratitude is also due to the community in the project area who were very responsive for which the team is grateful.
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | Revision No. 1 | June 13, 2011 | P a g e | ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ...... II
KEY TERMINOLOGIES ...... VI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...... VIII
1 INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND ...... 1 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES ...... 2 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ...... 2 1.4 OBJECTIVE OF THE RESETTLEMENT REVIEW AND UPDATE ...... 3 1.5 SCOPE OF WORK ...... 3 1.6 GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...... 4 1.7 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ...... 6 1.7.1 Socio-Economic Survey and Consultations...... 7 1.7.2 The Land Survey...... 8 1.7.3 Census and Valuation Methodology ...... 9 1.7.4 Basis of Valuation ...... 9 1.7.5 Method of Valuation ...... 10 1.7.6 Methods of Restitution ...... 10 1.8 REPORT DETAILS ...... 11 2 POLICY, LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK...... 12 2.1 POLICY FRAMEWORK ...... 12 2.1.1 Government Policies ...... 12 2.1.2 The World Bank Safeguard Policies ...... 14 2.1.3 World Bank Safeguard Policies ...... 14 2.2 THE UGANDAN LEGAL FRAME WORK ...... 16 2.2.1 The Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 ...... 17 2.2.2 The Electricity Act, Cap 145 ...... 17 2.2.3 The Land Act Cap 227 ...... 17 2.2.4 The Roads Act 1965 ...... 18 2.2.5 The Historical and Monument Act, 1967 ...... 19 2.2.6 Employment Act 2006 and Other Related Acts ...... 19 2.3 GAP ANALYSIS ...... 20 2.4 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ...... 23 2.4.1 Ministry of Lands and Physical Planning...... 24 2.4.2 Ministry of Water and Environment...... 24 2.4.3 Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning...... 24 2.4.4 Ministry of Gender, Labor and Social Development...... 25 2.4.5 Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development...... 25 2.4.6 District Local Government Authorities...... 26 2.4.7 District Land Boards (DLBs)...... 26 2.4.8 District Land Tribunals (DLTs) ...... 26 2.4.9 District Environment Officers (ODEOs)...... 26 2.4.10 The Village Committees...... 27 2.4.11 Non Governmental Organisations and CBOs ...... 27 3 IMPACTS OF THE PROJECT ...... 28 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION ...... 28 3.2 SCOPE OF PROJECT IMPACTS ...... 32 3.3 CATEGORY OF IMPACTS ...... 32 3.3.1 Loss Of Land And Property ...... 34 3.3.2 Impact On Structures ...... 35 3.3.3 Physical And Economic Displacement...... 36 3.3.4 Impact on Water Supply Systems ...... 37
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | ii
3.3.5 Impact on Economic Activities...... 37 3.3.6 Impact on Shrines and Graves ...... 37 3.3.7 Potentially Vulnerable Groups...... 39 3.3.8 Institutions Affected...... 42 4 SOCIO – ECONOMIC –BASELINE INFORMATION ...... 44 4.1 ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES ...... 44 4.2 POPULATION ...... 44 4.3 DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RESPONDENTS ...... 45 4.3.1 Age Distribution...... 45 4.3.2 Educational Levels...... 46 4.3.3 Health Status...... 47 4.3.4 Ethnicity and Religion...... 48 4.3.5 Length of Residency ...... 49 4.3.6 Settlement and Land Use...... 49 4.3.7 Land Tenure ...... 51 4.3.8 Livelihoods and Economic Activities ...... 51 4.3.9 Current Infrastructure...... 54 4.3.10 Shrines and Graves ...... 55 555 COMPENSATION FRAMEWORK AND ELIGIBILITY ...... 56
5.1 INTRODUCTION ...... 56 5.2 GENERAL GUIDING PRINCIPLES ...... 56 5.3 GUIDELINES ON DEFINITION OF RIGHT OF WAY CLEARANCES ...... 57 5.3.1 Actions for Transmission Line Right-Of- Way ...... 57 5.3.2 Guidelines for Resettlement Along the Right-Of-Way...... 58 5.3.3 Implication for Resettlement Action Planning ...... 60 5.4 ELIGIBILITY ...... 60 5.4.1 Loss of Assets ...... 62 5.5 COMPENSATION STRATEGY ...... 63 5.6 ENTITLEMENTS ...... 67 5.7 RESPONSIBILITY AND SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION PAYMENT ...... 70 5.7.1 Valuation Process and Methodology ...... 70 5.7.2 Valuation of Land ...... 70 5.7.3 Calculations for Compensation Payments and Related Considerations ...... 71 5.7.4 Compensation Options ...... 71 5.7.5 Compensation Packages ...... 72 5.7.6 Compensation Procedure ...... 74 6 RESETTLEMENT ASSISTANCE AND LIVELIHOOD RESTORATION ...... 77 6.1 RELOCATION PLANNING ...... 77 6.2 ELIGIBILITY FOR PHYSICAL RELOCATION ...... 77 6.3 IN KIND COMPENSATION PACKAGES ...... 77 6.3.1 New Housing ...... 77 6.3.2 Alternative Relocation Sites ...... 78 6.3.3 Replacement of Agricultural Land ...... 78 6.3.4 Moving Allowance and Moving Assistance ...... 78 6.3.5 Physical Relocation of Graves ...... 78 6.4 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR RESETTLEMENT ...... 79 6.4.1 Site Selection Criteria and Preparation ...... 79 6.4.2 Relative Suitability of Candidate Sites ...... 80 6.4.3 Final Resettlement Site Selection ...... 80 6.5 RESETTLEMENT SCHEDULING ...... 81 6.6 LAND REQUIREMENT FOR STORAGE ...... 82 6.7 CULTURAL MITIGATION PLANNING ...... 83 6.7.1 Background ...... 83 6.7.2 General Objective: ...... 84 6.7.3 The Properties ...... 84 6.7.4 The Approaches ...... 84 7 COSTS AND BUDGET...... 88 7.1 RESETTLEMENT COSTS ...... 88
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | iii
7.2 LESSONS LEARNT AND BEST PRACTICES ...... 88 8 ORGANISATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ...... 90 8.1 RAP I MPLEMENTATION ...... 90 8.2 ORGANISATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY ...... 91 8.2.1 UETCL – Resettlement Unit ...... 91 8.2.2 PAP Committee (PC) ...... 92 8.2.3 Related Local Government Departments ...... 92 9 PUBLIC CONSULTATION AND DISCLOSURE...... 94 9.1 INTRODUCTION ...... 94 9.2 STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS ...... 95 9.2.1 Stake Holders Consulted...... 95 9.3 STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ...... 100 9.3.1 Approach And Thematic Areas ...... 100 9.3.2 Community Sensitisation...... 101 9.4 STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS ...... 105 9.5 CONCLUSION ...... 109 10 GRIEVANCE RESOLUTION MECHANISMS...... 110 10.1 AIM OF GRIEVANCE REDRESS PROCEDURE ...... 110 10.2 TYPES OF GRIEVANCES ...... 110 10.3 GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 111 10.4 INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS ...... 114 10.4.1 Grievance Redress Procedure...... 115 10.4.2 Conflict and Grievance Minimisation Through Information Disclosure and Consultation...... 115 10.5 INDEPENDENT (E XTERNAL ) M ONITORING FOR GRIEVANCE REDRESS MECHANISM ...... 122 11 MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK...... 124 11.1 PERFORMANCE MONITORING ...... 125 11.2 PERFORMANCE MONITORING INDICATORS COULD INCLUDE : ...... 126 11.3 EXTERNAL MONITORING ...... 127 11.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACTION PLAN ...... 138 12 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION ...... 139 12.1 CONCLUSIONS ...... 139 12.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ...... 140
TABLE I: RAP REVIEW TEAM...... II TABLE II: ESTIMATED NUMBER OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS PER DISTRICT ...... TABLE1: COMPARISON OF RELEVANT UGANDAN POLICIES AND REGULATIONS WITH THOSE OF THE WORLD BANK ...... 21 TABLE2: ADMINISTRATIVE BOUNDARIES AND VILLAGES TRAVERSED BY THE T-LINE ...... 28 TABLE 3: LAND UPTAKE...... 34 TABLE 4 : SUMMARY OF IMPACTS PER CATEGORY...... 35 TABLE 5 SHOWS A SUMMARY OF THE VULNERABLE PAPS PER DISTRICT PER VILLAGE 39 TABLE 6: ESTIMATED NUMBER OF AFFECTED HOUSEHOLDS PER DISTRICT...... 44 TABLE 7: ILLUSTRATION OF THE OWNERSHIP STRATEGY AND COMPENSATION STRATEGY FOR TRANSMISSION LINE ADOPTED FROM THE RESETTLEMENT HANDBOOK BY IFC...... 65 TABLE 8 : ENTITLEMENT MATRIX TABLE 9 SUMMARY ON THE METHODOLOGY FOR VALUATION OF AFFECTED PROPERTIES...... 74 TABLE 10: ITEMS REQUIRED FOR RELOCATION OF BURIAL GROUNDS ...... 86 TABLE 11: ASPECTS TO BE COVERED DURING COMPENSATION ...... 86 TABLE12 ESTIMATED RESETTLEMENT COSTS...... 88 TABLE 13: : RAP IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE AND KEY ACTIVITIES ...... 90 TABLE 14: PERTINENT ISSUES RAISED BY PAPS TABLE 14: SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS...... 97 TABLE 15 GRIEVANCE MINIMIZATION, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION ACTIVITIES119 TABLE 16 SUMMARY OF PERFOMANCE/ EVALUATION INDICATORS ...... 130
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | iv
TABLE 17 MONITORING INPUTS AND OUTPUTS ...... 135
Appendix 1: INFORMATION BROCHURE Appendix 2. MAP showing line route Appendix 3. list of impacts per village Appendix 4. list of vulnureable groups Appendix 5. summaries of consultative meetings Appendix 6. socio-economic status of PAPs Appendix 7. socio- economic survey questionaires Appendix 8. pap registration forms
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | v
KEY TERMINOLOGIES
Wherever the following terminologies are used in this document, they are used to mean the definitions presented below. Most of the definitions are sourced from the World Bank “Handbook for Preparing a Resettlement Action Plan”, 2001, with or without modifications as relevant to this Project .
Project-Affected Area means an area, which is subject to a change in use because of the construction or operation of the Project.
Project-Affected Person (PAP) means any person who, as a result of the implementation of the Project, loses the right to own, use, or otherwise benefit from a built structure, land (residential, agricultural, pasture or undeveloped/unused land), annual or perennial crops and trees, or any other fixed or moveable asset, either in full or in part, permanently or temporarily. PAPs may include: • Physically Displaced People, i.e. people subject to Physical • Displacement as defined hereunder, • Economically Displaced People, i.e. people subject to Economic • Displacement as defined hereunder.
Physical Displacement means loss of shelter and assets resulting from the acquisition of land associated with the Project that requires the affected person(s) to move to another location.
Economic Displacement means loss of income streams or means of livelihood resulting from land acquisition or obstructed access to resources (land, water or forest) caused by the construction or operation of the Project or its associated facilities.
Project-Affected Household (PAH) means a household that includes one or several Project- Affected Persons as defined above. A PAH will usually include a head of household, his/her spouse and their children, but may also include other dependents living in the same dwelling or set of dwellings, like close relatives such as parents and grandchildren. Compensation means cash or in-kind payments at replacement value for an asset or a resource acquired or affected by the Project at the time the asset is replaced.
Resettlement Assistance means support provided to people physically displaced by the Project. Assistance may include transportation, and social or other services provided to affected people during their relocation. Assistance may also include cash allowances that compensate affected people for the inconvenience associated with resettlement and defray the expenses of a transition to a new locale, such as moving expenses and lost workdays. Replacement Value means the rate of compensation for lost assets calculated at full replacement value, it is, the market value of the assets plus transaction costs (taxes, registration fees, cost of
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | vi
transport associated with registration of new land and land transfer, etc). The replacement value must reflect the cost at the time the item is replaced. As for land and structures, “replacement value” is defined as follows: • Agricultural Land: the market value of land of equal productive use or potential located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of preparation to levels similar to or better than those of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes; • Land in Urban Areas: the market value of land of equal size and use, with similar or improved public infrastructure facilities and services, preferably located in the vicinity of the affected land, plus the cost of any registration and transfer taxes; • Household and Public Structures: the cost of purchasing or building a new structure, with an area and quality similar to or better than those of the affected structure, or of repairing a partially affected structure, including labor and contractors’ fees and any registration and transfer taxes. In determining the replacement cost, depreciation of the asset and the value of salvage materials are not taken into account, nor is the value of the benefits to be derived from the Project deducted from the valuation of an affected asset.
Vulnerable Groups means people who by virtue of gender, ethnicity, age, physical or mental disability, economic disadvantage, or social status may be more adversely affected by resettlement than others and who may be limited in their ability to claim or take advantage of resettlement assistance and related development benefits.
Sub-county Uganda has a Local Governments System operating at different levels. These are Local Council V (LC V) – District; LC IV – County/Municipality; LC III – Sub-County; LC II – Parish and LC I – Village. The role of the local governments is to implement and monitor government programs at the respective levels. Mailo Land It involves the holding of land in perpetuity, permits the separation of ownership of land from the ownership of developments made on land by a lawful or bona-fide occupant (generally known as Tenant). Additionally, the holder can only exercise transactions on the land subject to the rights of those persons occupying the land.
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | vii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Project Background The Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL) proposes to construct 134 Km of a 220 kV transmission line from Kawanda to Masaka to evacuate power from Bujagali and other proposed hydropower stations on the Nile to central Uganda as well as serve as a high voltage backbone to the proposed regional interconnection network between Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, and DR Congo. The project will be financed by the IDA under the Electricity Sector Development Project (ESDP). The proposed transmission line will transmit power from Kawanda 220/132/33kV substation to Masaka West substation from which the load centers of Masaka, Mbarara shall be supplied with power. Overall, the proposed construction of the transmission lines will be associated with: • Consultancy Services for Detailed Line Route Survey, Line Profiling, Geological Survey, Tower Spotting, Designs and Supervision of Works during construction. • Construction of a new 220kV double circuit steel tower transmission line (135km) from the proposed new 220/132 Kawanda substation (to be operated initially at 132kV) to the new Masaka west 220kV substation. • Extension and construction of Masaka West 220kV Substation • Construction of 2 X 220kV feeder line bays at the new Kawanda Substation ( to be initially operated at 132kV) • Construction of 2X220 kV feeder line bays Masaka West Substation ( to be initially operated at 132kV) • Installation of 2X125MVA, 220/132/33kV Auto transformers at the existing Masaka West 220/132kV Substation. • Two 220kV and two 132kV transformer bays • Clearing of right-of-way as necessary • Construction of access roads as necessary • Construction of workers camps and storage facilities for the project materials
In addition, the project will invest in a community support program to help the communities around both the stations of Kawanda and Masaka and along the t-line reap benefits from the investment. At the same time MEMD will be fulfilling its social responsibility to Ugandans in this location. Community
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | viii
support activities include among others street lighting, lighting of markets, etc, in Masaka and along the t-line. However, the community development initiatives and the specific sub project activities will be developed and finalized during project implementation. A separate Resettlement Policy Framework has been prepared to cater for land acquisition in this program.
Project Objective The overall development objective of the main proposed project is to improve the availability and reliability of electricity supply in the central and southwest regions of Uganda. The specific project objectives include:
• Provision of adequate transmission capacity to supply the south western and Western region of Uganda • Provision of adequate transmission capacity for implementation of rural electrification • Improvement of quality and reliability of power supply to the south western and Western Uganda
It is envisaged that this project will trigger O.P.4.12 Involuntary resettlement and hence a Resettlement Action Plan for the Kawanda Masaka t-line has been prepared. Further it is necessary that a resettlement policy framework is prepared for the community support program as some activities may require the taking of land and assets thereon. Further, this is also because the scope and details of the specific community support program activities are not known and therefore an RPF has to be prepared and disclosed prior to Appraisal of the project.
Project Description The Project is 137 Km of a 220kV power line running from the existing Kawanda substation, 10 miles North of Kampala, to Masaka West substation. This line will transmit power generated from Bujagali and Karuma Hydro power Projects to the load centers of Masaka, areas of Western Uganda, Northern Tanzania and Rwanda in line with the East African Power Master Plan. It is aimed at reinforcing the capacity of Western transmission line to cater for the increasing demand of electricity in the districts of Wakiso, Mpigi & Masaka as well as provide backbone transmission of electricity within the East African region. The Government of Uganda has recently requested World Bank (IDA) to finance the project under the Energy Sector Development Project. The old feasibility, RAP, and RAP documents were handed over to the IDA for review. The Bank reviewed the documents and provided comments to guide the update of the documents to meet the IDA requirements. In the recent past, The IDA recommended that the 34 km Kawanda-Mpigi section of the transmission line corridor should be redesigned to traverse areas that are less encumbered by settlements.
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | ix
UETCL has therefore taken the recommendation and this has reduced both the number of Project Affected persons and assets to be lost.
Initially, UETCL contracted African Technologies Limited (AFRITECH) to develop A Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the people likely to be affected by the proposed line. The RAP was to identify Project Affected Persons (PAPs) and their property, assess the property for compensation, cases for resettlement, and develop guidelines for RAP implementation and monitoring arrangements. Although this had been completed in 2008, implementation was not undertaken. Therefore it was very important that an update of the RAP be made. It was therefore on this basis that UETCL contracted SMEC International to review and update the RAP of the entire proposed 137km 220kV transmission line and incorporate data from the 34km diversion.
Objectives of the Resettlement Review and Update I. Update and outline the current cost for land requirements for the works, including compensation for crops, buildings and other developments within the area of direct influence, II. Review and update any resettlement requirements for cases involving physical displacement and/or areas that need to be avoided due to congestion of human settlements or other sensitivities.
Approach and Methodology
In order to minimize resettlement as much as possible, the verification team from UETCL confirmed the diversion route and identified the gaps in the previous RAP. It is therefore on this basis that UETCL contracted SMEC International to update and review the RAP report earlier on prepared by AFRITEC U LTD. The review team from SMEC International used the following methods to accomplish the work.
Socio-economic Surveys and Consultations : The Consultant applied a variety of methodologies to ensure that impact and compensation assessments are based on current and verifiable socio-economic and demographic information. Consultations were undertaken amongst a number of stakeholders including Local Government Staffs, PAPs, and cultural leaders amongst others. Key issues that have emerged through the above processes include: • Employment – community desire and demand for a high level of employment, coupled with fear that the limited local skills base will result in exclusion. • Compensation - adequacy of the cash compensation.
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | x
• Resettlement – impacts and compensation measures for economic and physical displacement. • Livelihoods –loss of access to water points, schools, crop land and pasture. • Rural electrification – the community desire electricity as form of benefit to the project.
Land Survey: As per planning scheme of the transmission line, land survey was carried out by the surveyor to ascertain the level of encroachment and determination of the t-line right of way and way leaves. Marking and numbering of all structures within the RoW (yellow colour) and way leaves (white colour) is done. The surveyor together with the valuer undertook the inspection/referencing of all affected properties to collect basic data for compensation assessment. In addition, the affected property owners were requested to furnish the consultant with any relevant documents relating to their interest in the properties. Census and Valuation Methodology : In the presence of the LC I Chairperson or representative, the Valuer carefully counted all crops and trees, measured buildings/structures while the owner/affected person verified the count. A “Compensation Assessment Form” was filled to record properties affected. The LC I Chairperson, property owner and Valuer verified the contents and signed the form. The Chairperson signed as witness to the count. The affected person retained a copy and the Valuer kept the original. Calculation to determine the amount for compensation for crops, trees, and structures was done using the market rate based on approved district compensation rates for the districts through which the line passes . The rates for Kampala District were used for this project firstly because Mpigi and Masaka did not have District rates. Secondly these rates are generally higher affording PAPs a ‘fair’ compensation. Policy, Legal and Institutional Framework
The main issue in land acquisition, resettlement implementation and management is presence of an appropriate legal, policy & institutional framework to cater for (i) land acquisition, (ii) compensation, (iii) relocation, (iv) income restoration and (v) livelihoods restoration programs. Government and donor policies are crucial in successful implementation of projects that lead to property acquisition, destruction and displacement of people. Although t he Government of Uganda (GoU) has no specific policy on resettlement and compensation it recognizes the right of persons to own property and be compensated for loss of property. The right to own property and be compensated for loss is derived from various sections of the 1995 Constitution, Local Government Act 1997 and Land Act 1998. Furthermore, the GoU recognizes the World Bank Operation Safeguard Policy OP 4.12 (2001) on involuntary resettlement that provides basis on which the World Bank screens proposed projects to determine the appropriate extent and type of RAP to be undertaken.
Review and Update Kawanda Masaka 220kV, 137km T Line 5116008 | June 13, 2011 Page | xi
In order to ensure that the RAP for the proposed 220kV Kawanda-Masaka power line meets the environmental and social policies and the World Bank Policy on Involuntary resettlement, gap analysis was carried out on the relevant Ugandan and development partner policies, legislations and guidelines. Under the Ugandan laws the affected persons are monetarily compensated, and that the affected persons are only eligible for compensation if they have legally recognized rights to the subject land, but the World Bank requires that all affected persons should be compensated, regardless of their occupancy status. WB policy provides for alternative land where compensation on land for land basis, compensation in kind and goes beyond monetary compensation by specifying that income must be restored at full replacement cost. In addition, both annual and perennial crops must be compensated for in cash at an established rate, or annual crops may be given time to mature and be harvested.
That notwithstanding, there are a number of legislative and regulatory instruments in Uganda that address land acquisition and settlement both general and specific terms. Among these is the 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda and a number of Acts. The Acts and Regulations of particular relevance to the proposed 220kV Kawanda-Masaka power line are;