DOCSLIB.ORG

2.4 the Collingridge Dilemma

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2.4 the Collingridge Dilemma A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/93146 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications THE CONTENTIOUS POLITICS OF DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION: VAPING AND FRACKING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Jacob Adam Hasselbalch Erasmus Mundus Doctoral Fellow Submitted for the degrees of PhD in Politics and International Studies (Warwick) and PhD in Political and Social Sciences (ULB) Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Warwick Département de Sciences Politiques, Université Libre de Bruxelles February 2017 Contents Part 1: Innovation governance: the politics of disruption 1. Introduction: disruptive innovation as a problem for politics p. 1 2. How disruptive innovations become political problems p. 31 3. Innovation politics versus the politics of innovation p. 57 4. Framing disruption p. 87 Part 2: Vaping and fracking in the European Union 5. The importance of first impressions: marking disruptiveness p. 116 6. Expertise and the framing of risk: cognitive framing strategies p. 151 7. The deep structure of policy debates: normative and relational p. 181 framing strategies 8. Discourse as network: frame usage over time p. 218 9. Conclusion: harmony and dissonance in the governance of p. 273 disruption ii Expanded table of contents List of tables and figures ................................................................................................. vii List of abbreviations ....................................................................................................... viii Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................... xi Declaration ..................................................................................................................... xiv Summary ......................................................................................................................... xv PART 1: INNOVATION GOVERNANCE: THE POLITICS OF DISRUPTION Chapter 1: Introduction: disruptive innovation as a problem for politics 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 The Napster precedent ............................................................................................... 4 1.3 Theoretical and methodological approach ................................................................. 8 1.3.1 Case selection ................................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 Methods and data .............................................................................................. 18 1.4 Plan of the dissertation ............................................................................................. 21 1.5 Original contributions .............................................................................................. 27 Chapter 2: How disruptive innovations become political problems 2.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 31 2.2 Defining disruption .................................................................................................. 32 2.3 Political and market consequences of disruptive innovation ................................... 39 2.3.1 The importance of controversy ......................................................................... 40 2.3.2 How disruptive innovations challenge regulators ............................................ 44 2.4 The Collingridge dilemma ....................................................................................... 49 2.4.1 Studying the Collingridge dilemma in practice ................................................ 51 2.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 3: Innovation politics versus the politics of innovation 3.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 57 3.2 Innovation politics: policy as viewed from innovation studies ............................... 58 3.3 The politics of innovation: innovation as viewed from political science ................ 65 iii 3.3.1 The myth of the powerless state ....................................................................... 65 3.3.2 The myth of the powerless bureaucracy ........................................................... 69 3.3.3 Experts, expertise and legitimacy in regulation ............................................... 72 3.3.4 Transnational settings and the European Union ............................................... 79 3.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 84 Chapter 4: Framing disruption 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 87 4.2 Making sense of Collingridge dilemmas ................................................................. 88 4.2.1 Collingridge dilemmas are not given – they are constructed ........................... 90 4.2.2 Collingridge dilemmas are not solved – they are negotiated ........................... 92 4.3 Framing theory ......................................................................................................... 95 4.3.1 Framing in political science and sociology ...................................................... 97 4.3.2 The mechanistic versus ecological views on framing .................................... 101 4.4 The sociology of disruption: punctuated cooperation............................................ 105 4.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 111 PART 2: VAPING AND FRACKING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Chapter 5: The importance of first impressions: marking disruptiveness 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 116 5.2 First-mover advantages in framing ........................................................................ 117 5.3 First impressions in the electronic cigarettes debate ............................................. 122 5.3.1 Regulatory gaps and how to fill them............................................................. 123 5.3.2 Assessing the impact of the TPD.................................................................... 127 5.3.3 The resilience of the pharmaceutical products frame ..................................... 132 5.4 First impressions in the fracking debate ................................................................ 135 5.4.1 Gasland and the fracking controversy ............................................................ 136 5.4.2 Fracking encounters institutional complexity ................................................ 140 5.4.3 First impressions and public sentiment .......................................................... 145 5.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 147 iv Chapter 6: Expertise and the framing of risk: cognitive framing strategies 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 151 6.2 Disruptive innovation as risk ................................................................................. 153 6.3 Cognitive framing strategies: precaution ............................................................... 160 6.3.1 The uncertainty of e-cigarette science ............................................................ 161 6.3.2 Fracking as a novel risk .................................................................................. 165 6.4 Cognitive framing strategies: prevention ............................................................... 170 6.4.1 The certainty of e-cigarette science ................................................................ 170 6.4.2 Fracking as a well-known risk ........................................................................ 174 6.5 Conclusion: the limits of expertise ........................................................................ 179 Chapter 7: The deep structure of policy debates: normative and relational framing strategies 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 181 7.2 Normative framing strategies: avoidance .............................................................. 182 7.2.1 E-cigarettes: abstinence .................................................................................. 183 7.2.2 Fracking: avoiding fossil fuel lock-in ............................................................ 186 7.3 Normative framing strategies: acceptance ............................................................. 188 7.3.1 E-cigarettes: harm reduction .......................................................................... 188 7.3.2 Fracking:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PENN ROAR January 2013 Volume 3 Pennsylvania’S Royalty Ow Ners Action Report Issue 1
    PENN ROAR January 2013 Volume 3 Pennsylvania’s Royalty Ow ners Action Report Issue 1 Penn ROAR, 359 Route 106 Greenfield Twp, PA 18407 [email protected] 570-267-4083 for advertising Inside NARO-PA premiere party & January 22 @ Montrose VFW … see page 5 This Issue Page 3… Market Enhancement Clauses and ‘Deductions’: New Well Owners Do I Have a Claim Against the Gas Company for Improper Booklet Answers Many Questions Royalty Payments? By: Douglas A. Clark, The Clark Law Firm, PC Page 4… An extremely hot issue at the present New Documentary addressing royalty calculation in effort to Aims to Correct time involves post-production costs or eliminate or reduce post-production costs. “Lies” and “deductions” that landowners are seeing One common royalty addendum “Misinformation” subtracted from their gas royalty checks. provision, often referred to as a “Market Typically, boilerplate Oil and Gas Leases Enhancement Clause”, began to surface in offered to landowners clearly permit the gas Page 6… many Oil and Gas Lease Addendum. The New Tax Rates & company to deduct post-production costs for “Market Enhancement Clause” provides as Rules to Affect Your the cost of producing, gathering, storing, Wallet for 2013 separating, treating, follows: dehydrating, processing, MARKET Page 7… transporting and marketing ENHANCEMENT Legislative Update the oil and gas. CLAUSE In the 2010 Pennsylvania All oil, gas or Page 8… Supreme Court’s decision in other proceeds accruing Marcellus Shale Kilmer v Elexco Land to Lessor under this lease boom sparks Services, Inc. et al., 605 or by state law shall be student's interest in oil, gas law Pa.413, 990 A.2D 147 (Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Enabling Patient Mobility in the EU: Between Free Movement and Coordination Willy Palm and Irene A
    12 Enabling patient mobility in the EU: between free movement and coordination Willy Palm and Irene A. Glinos 1. Introduction Free movement of patients – or patient mobility, as it is commonly referred to – implies people accessing health care services outside their home state. 1 Although health care normally is delivered close to where people live, in some instances the need for medical care arises while away from home or patients decide to seek care elsewhere. Patients’ readiness to travel for care, especially across borders, 2 is determined by a mix of factors linked to the specifi c situation of the patient, to the specifi c medical needs and to availability of care at home and abroad. Motivations for travelling abroad for care vary from the search for more timely, better quality or more affordable health care to treat- ment responding better to the patient’s wants or needs – including when care is inexistent or even prohibited at home. 3 While citizens in the EU, in principle, are free to seek health care wherever they want and from whatever provider available, in practice this freedom is limited by their ability to pay for it or by the condi- tions set out by public and private funding systems for health care. Traditionally, countries have confi ned statutory cover for health care delivered to their population to providers established in their territory. 4 Whereas initially, bilateral conventions derogated from this territoriality 1 By ‘home’ state or country, we mean the country of residence, which is usually also the country where the patient is affi liated to the social security system.
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels Think Tank Dialogue – State of the Union 2014
    BRUSSELS THINK TANK DIALOGUE – STATE OF THE UNION 2014 THE EU’S NEW LEADERS: KEY POST-ELECTION CHALLENGES List of Registrations Date: Tuesday, 28 January 2014, 10.00 – 17.30 (followed by a reception) Venue: Résidence Palace (Polak Room), Rue de la Loi 155, 1040 Brussels Aavatsmark Paal I. M. Counsellor, Mission of Norway to the EU, Brussels Abbott Charles Policy Assistant, Scotland Europa, Brussels Abdo Amr Master Student, Free University of Brussels Aelen Dirk Assistant to Ambassador Nkosi, Embassy of South Africa to Belgium, Brussels Ahäuser Farina Assistant, International Crisis Group, Brussels Ahmad Nurriha First Secretary, Mission of Malaysia to the EU, Brussels Ahtonen Annika Policy Analyst, European Policy Centre (EPC), Brussels Akaba Ahmet Student, Brussels Allen James Senior Policy Adviser, Confederation of British Industry, Brussels Alne Sture Technical Officer, World Health Organization (WHO), Brussels Ambos Kristina Intern, Representation of the Free State of Bavaria to the EU, Brussels Ambrusics Agnes Intern, Permanent Representation of Hungary to the EU, Brussels Anechitei Bianca Programme Assistant, European Foundation for Democracy, Brussels Angar Oyun Third Secretary, Embassy of Mongolia to Belgium, Brussels Appel Claus-Peter Deputy Director, Representation of the State of Hessen to the EU, Brussels Arbilla Jose Maria Head Economic Sector, Embassy of Argentina to Belgium, Brussels Ariz Leire Media Officer, Bruegel, Brussels Arndt Tobias Chief Operating Officer / EU Representative, European Dysmelia Reference Information
    [Show full text]
  • Europe and the Vanishing Two-State Solution
    EUROPE AND THE VANISHING TWO-STATE SOLUTION Nick Witney ABOUT ECFR The European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) is the first pan-European think-tank. Launched in October 2007, its objective is to conduct research and promote informed debate across Europe on the development of coherent, effective and values-based European foreign policy. ECFR has developed a strategy with three distinctive elements that define its activities: •A pan-European Council. ECFR has brought together a distinguished Council of over two hundred Members – politicians, decision makers, thinkers and business people from the EU’s member states and candidate countries – which meets once a year as a full body. Through geographical and thematic task forces, members provide ECFR staff with advice and feedback on policy ideas and help with ECFR’s activities within their own countries. The Council is chaired by Martti Ahtisaari, Joschka Fischer and Mabel van Oranje. • A physical presence in the main EU member states. ECFR, uniquely among European think-tanks, has offices in Berlin, London, Madrid, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. In the future ECFR plans to open an office in Brussels. Our offices are platforms for research, debate, advocacy and communications. • A distinctive research and policy development process. ECFR has brought together a team of distinguished researchers and practitioners from all over Europe to advance its objectives through innovative projects with a pan-European focus. ECFR’s activities include primary research, publication of policy reports, private meetings and public debates, ‘friends of ECFR’ gatherings in EU capitals and outreach to strategic media outlets. ECFR is a registered charity funded by the Open Society Foundations and other generous foundations, individuals and corporate entities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal and Constitutional Nature of the New International Treaties on Economic and Monetary Union from the Perspective of Eu Law
    P-с \<L Ka ¿^ ļ/s ^ ^—T> . _ _Λί_- ΛνΛ.1^-^<Λ-\,?_--^/V" p/ Jk*, Focus THE LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL NATURE OF THE NEW INTERNATIONAL TREATIES ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY UNION FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EU LAW Rose M. D'Sa LL.B. (Hons), Ph.D (University of Birmingham, UK) Barrister at Law (MiddleTemple, non-practising) Consultant in European Union Law Member, European Economic and Social Committee (EESC, Brussels) Introduction This article1 discusses, in particular, two proposed Treaties of an "inter-goverrimental" nature (i.e. Treaties governed by International Law rather than European Union Law). The first is the Treaty on Stability, Co-ordination and Governance in the Economic and Monetary Union (hereinafter referred to as the "TSCG") and the second, theTreaty on the European Stability Mechanism ("TESM"or ESM Treaty). The analysis focuses inter alia on the issue of whether the creation of these instruments is, of itself, legal and constitutional within the framework of the EU Treaties, their future relationship with the existing EU legal framework and whether their objectives could or should, as a matter of law, have been achieved within the framework of the latter. It takes account of the texts of relevant legal instruments as they stood on February 2, 2012, though some limited reference to later events has been possible. In particular, the TSCG was formally signed on March 2, 2012. The most recent alterations to its text include a new focus on growth, but otherwise appear minor. European politics in recent years and months has become increasingly focused on the economic, financial and sovereign debt crisis, created in part by the situation in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • ENERGY UNION More Power Or Hot Air
    THE EUROPEAN AFFAIRS DAILY europolitics.info ENERGY UNION More power or hot air Tuesday 3 February 2015 N° 5022 43rd year www.europolitics.info The European affairs daily - www.europolitics.info Europolitics is the publication of choice for EU professionals and the wider public. Subscribe at [email protected] and get all the latest news about EU policies at your door. THE PUBLICATION OF CHOICE FOR EU Follow us PROFESSIONALS AND THE WIDER PUBLIC EUROPOLITICS_SA Rue d’Arlon, 53 | B-1040 Brussels – Belgium | T: +32(0)2 737 77 09 D13115-AP-Europolitics-UK-V2.indd 1 08/01/14 11:21 Europolitics is the publication of choice for EU professionals and the wider public. Europolitics is the publication of choice for EU professionals and the wider public. SubscribeSubscribe at [email protected] at [email protected] and and get allget the all latest the latest news news aboutabout EU EU policies policies at at your your door. door. Editorial advisors: Correspondents: Layout, photo edition, website: TELEPHONE THE PUBLICATION OF CHOICE FOR EU Follow us Marc Paoloni Athens: Markus Bernath Grégoire Maus Editorial: +32 2 737 77 22 Rory WatsonPROFESSIONALS AND THEBerlin WIDER: Jakob PUBLIC Schlandt Nathalie de Jamblinne EUROPOLITICS_SA Berne: Edgar Bloch Anke Harthoorn E-MAIL is published by EISRue (Europe d’Arlon, 53 | B-1040Reporters: Brussels – Belgium | T: +32(0)2Paris 737: 77 Joël 09 Spaes General: Information Service S.A.), Ed Bray, Marie-Martine Riga: Antoine Jacob Agenda: Zsolt Kozma [email protected] Rue
    [Show full text]
  • EU Study Tour and Internship Program 2010 Internship Positions: “Confirmed” and “To Be Confirmed” (TBC) -- in Alpha Order
    EU Study Tour and Internship Program 2010 Internship Positions: “confirmed” and “to be confirmed” (TBC) -- in alpha order. Host institution Location # Status Association of the German Chambers of Brussels (Belgium) 1 TBC Commerce and Industry (DIHK)- Representation to the EU Canadian Embassy to Belgium and Brussels (Belgium) 1 Confirmed Luxembourg Canadian Embassy to the Baltic States Riga (Latvia) 2 Confirmed Canadian Mission to the European Union Brussels (Belgium) 4 Confirmed Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Brussels (Belgium) 2 TBC Council of Europe (Health) Strasbourg (France) 1 Confirmed Council of Europe (Pompidou Group) Strasbourg (France) 1 Confirmed ECOSOC (Sustainable Development Brussels (Belgium) 1 TBC Observatory) EU Agency for Fundamental Rights Vienna (Austria) 1 TBC EU Agency-Health & Consumers’ Protection Luxembourg (Luxembourg) 1 Confirmed EUROCHAMBRES Brussels (Belgium) 1 Confirmed European Central Bank Frankfurt (Germany) 1 TBC European Commission-DG Education Brussels (Belgium) 2 Confirmed European Court of Human Rights Strasbourg (France) 1 TBC European Court of Justice Luxembourg (Luxembourg) 1 TBC European Environmental Agency (EEA) Brussels (Belgium) 1 Confirmed Brussels liaison office European Investment Bank Luxembourg (Luxembourg) 1 TBC European Parliament (MEP’s) Brussels (Belgium) 1 TBC European Parliament (Parties) Brussels (Belgium) 1 Confirmed European People’s Party European Parliament (Parties) Brussels (Belgium) 1 Confirmed European People’s Party—Think tank European Parliament (Parties) Brussels
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Made Simple
    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MADE SIMPLE 2014-2019 The European Parliament Made Simple is produced by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) as a introduction to the workings of the European Parliament for amateurs and experts alike. Production Team Editor and project manager Giovanni Mastrobuono Senior Communications Officer Editorial assistance Alexandrine Gauvin Communications Officer Eli Corso-Phinney Communications Intern The information contained in this publication has been compiled in good faith and is accurate according to the most recent sources available at the time of going to press. Photographs used with the kind permission of the Audiovisual Libraries of the European Commission, Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. First edition, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-9146856-7-2 Printed in Belgium American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Avenue des Arts 53, B-1000 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 513 68 92 Fax: +32 (0)2 513 79 28 [email protected] www.amchameu.eu Foreword Susan Danger Managing Director American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union t is with great pleasure that I present AmCham EU’s newest guide, The European Parliament Made Simple. The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2009, gave the European Parliament greater power in EU Idecision-making and an increased role in selecting and approving the European Commission. As a result, this year’s European election has a greater democratic influence than ever before. With this in mind, AmCham EU has published The European Parliament Made Simple to explain the Parliament’s expanded powers and roles, for both the Brussels policy community and public affairs professionals in the EU and US.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Economic Governance in the European Monetary Union
    Evolution of Economic Governance in the European Monetary Union Silvio Attard and Alexander Demarco1 WP/03/2013 1 Mr Attard is a Senior Economist in the Bank’s Economic Analysis Office and Mr Demarco is the Head of the Bank’s Financial Stability Department. They would like to thank Dr Bernard Gauci for his help. The views ex- pressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Central Bank of Malta. All remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors. Abstract This note provides an account of the major milestones in the evolution of the economic gov- ernance in the European monetary union, assessing the reforms in governance frameworks of the EMU from 1997 up to mid-2013. It mainly focuses on the post-2010 reforms, where the financial crisis and the ensuing sovereign debt crisis exposed the weakness of the eco- nomic governance framework of EMU in Europe. It also highlights the on-going proposals for further coordination and cooperation that have been brought forward but still require agree- ment among Member States. The note suggests that while the commitment shown to intro- duce stricter fiscal rules and enhanced surveillance was a necessary step forward for sus- taining the credibility of the single European currency, further reforms focusing on deepening European integration are still needed. 1. Introduction The setting up of a monetary union among a number of sovereign states inevitably requires strict rules of economic governance in order to prevent moral hazard and free-riding by indi- vidual member states.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States: a Framing Analysis Kenneth Stephen Cardell Jr
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 Hydraulic Fracturing In the United States: A Framing Analysis Kenneth Stephen Cardell Jr. University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Cardell Jr., K.(2017). Hydraulic Fracturing In the United States: A Framing Analysis. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4429 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Hydraulic Fracturing in the United States: A Framing Analysis By Kenneth Stephen Cardell Jr. Bachelor of Arts University of South Carolina Upstate, 2012 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in Journalism College of Information and Communications University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: Sei-Hill Kim, Director of Thesis Andrea Tanner, Reader Brooke McKeever, Reader Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Kenneth S. Cardell Jr., 2017 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION To my parents, with love and gratitude, Sherry and Jeff Goodman & Ken and Penny Cardell. Thanks for a lifetime of encouragement; without each of you this accomplishment would not have been possible. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank everyone who contributed to the completion of this thesis research. First, I would like to thank the chair of my thesis committee, Dr. Sei-Hill Kim, for his guidance and patience during the research process.
    [Show full text]
  • Going Global: Europe's Security Policy Challenge
    CONFERENCE REPORT Co-organised by: Pub 76>,905.;/,-<;<9, *HYYPLY /HTPS[VU:\UKZ[YHUK 6[PZ 7YH[[ >OP[UL` :PRVYZR` <;*-PYL :LJ\YP[` >LHYL[OLJVTWHUPLZVM<UP[LK;LJOUVSVNPLZ>LLTWSV`ULHYS` WLVWSLHJYVZZ,\YVWLHUJV\U[YPLZ-YVT0YLSHUK[V :0?)<:05,::,: ;\YRL`HUKMYVT-PUSHUK[V7VY[\NHSV\YWYVK\J[ZHUK[LJOUVSVNPLZ 65,76>,9-<3*647(5@ WV^LYTVKLYUSPML¶H[OVTLH[^VYRHUKL]LY`^OLYLPUIL[^LLU >LKL]LSVWZLJ\YP[`HUKKLMLUZLJHWHIPSP[PLZ[VWYV[LJ[`V\MYVT OHYTHUKLUZ\YL[OH[V\YL]LYJOHUNPUN^VYSKY\UZIL[[LYMHZ[LY HUKTVYLLMÄJPLU[S`>LHYL<UP[LK;LJOUVSVNPLZ SECURITY AND DEFENCE DAY 2010 Conference Report 3 GOING GLOBAL: EUROPE’S SECURITY POLICY CHALLENGE CONFERENCE REPORT Security and Defence Day Palais d’Egmont - Brussels - 30 November 2010 4 Conference Report SECURITY AND DEFENCE DAY 2010 Giles Merritt Olivier Darrason Foreword In November 2010, the SDA and CEIS organised with that of the French Presidency in 2008 and that of their joint Security & Defence Day conference for the Sweden in 2009, the Belgian Presidency gave its sup- third year running. This annual event allows business port to this event from the outset, and naturally we hope leaders and policymakers from the European institu- that this will be the case with the Polish Presidency. tions and member states to freely express their views on Our thanks go out to our many distinguished speak- the key security and defence topics of tomorrow. ers for their contributions, and first and foremost to This latest SecDef conference covered a range of Pieter De Crem, the Belgian Minister of Defence, sensitive and important issues under the broad head- and Kristalina Georgieva, European Commissioner ings of the Lisbon Treaty’s implementation and the EU for International Cooperation, Humanitarian Aid and budget for 2014-2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Fracknation Documentary Filmmaker Phelim Mcaleer in Boulder to Challenge Anti-Fracking Documentary
    FrackNation Documentary Filmmaker Phelim McAleer in Boulder to Challenge Anti-Fracking Documentary Boulder, CO (May 23, 2013) – Boulder was the epicenter of the Fracking wars on Wednesday evening as two rival documentaries on the subject were screened the same night. Colorado Women’s Alliance, Americans for Prosperity, Liberty on the Rocks and other local groups hosted a free screening of the controversial “pro-fracking” documentary FrackNation at the Boulder Marriott on Wednesday, May 23 from 6:30-9:00 PM. Producer Phelim McAleer was on hand for a Q&A following the free screening. FrackNation was written and directed by Irish journalist Phelim McAleer. It presents an alternative view to the documentary Gasland, written and directed by filmmaker Josh Foxx. Foxx was in Boulder for a screening of GasLand 2, the sequel to the HBO documentary that kicked of much of the anti-fracking movement. “When word got out that Josh Foxx was going to be in Boulder, members of the local community invited me to come out and host a screening of FrackNation,” said Phelim McAleer, writer and director of FrackNation. “Foxx's previous film, the first Gasland, has been heavily criticized with claims that he has misrepresented and exaggerated the risks of Fracking and spread alarmism and scare stories.” “Many in Colorado were concerned that there should be an alternative point of view on hydraulic fracturing, and screening FrackNation on the same night as Gasland 2 just made sense,” said Debbie Brown, executive director of Colorado Women’s Alliance. McAleer said he was delighted to bring FrackNation to Boulder.
    [Show full text]