DOCSLIB.ORG

Making the Southern Margin of Laurentia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making the Southern Margin of Laurentia Introduction: Making the Southern Margin of Laurentia Robert Stern1, William R. Dickinson2, and Timothy Lawton3 1Department of Geosciences, University of Texas at Dallas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richardson, Texas 75080, USA 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Gould-Simpson Building #77, 1040 E 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 3Department of Geological Sciences, New Mexico State University, MSC 3AB, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003, USA Continental crust is very long-lived but conti- nent. At the other end of the spectrum, Africa supercontinent Rodinia and the Ouachita orogeny nents themselves are ephemeral. Earth’s inven- is the only shrinking continent, riven with rifts ~300 Ma leading to the formation of Pangea) tory of continental crust changes slowly but and surrounded by spreading ridges and con- and two episodes of rifting to form new ocean how this material is partitioned into separate tinental fragments, geomemories of the much basins (Cambrian rifting ~530 Ma to form the aggregations is always changing. We call these larger continental assembly, Gondwana. Other Rheic ocean and Jurassic rifting ~165 Ma to distinct aggregations of buoyant, felsic crust processes also change continental size and form the Gulf of Mexico). Southern Laurentia “continents” and now there are 6 of them: North shape, such as strike-slip (transform) fault- faces the Pacifi c on its west, and subduction America, South America, Antarctica, Eurasia, ing, although such geo-whittling doesn’t affect of Pacifi c seafl oor has been an intermittently Africa, and Australia. There are many smaller continental confi gurations as profoundly as col- important aspect of its tectonic evolution since minicontinents like Arabia, Madagascar, and liding and rifting do. Interactions with mantle Pangea formed ~300 Ma. To the east, southern Greenland. From the human perspective, these melting anomalies (plumes) or subduction of a Laurentia felt the extensional stresses of Tethys, names have great signifi cance as the sites of spreading ridge beneath a continent also act as opening within Pangea. All these episodes our nations, civilizations, and cultures, but the modest re arrangers of continental crust. played roles in shaping the southern margin names of continents are not useful in the long “The Supercontinent Cycle” (Nance et al., of Laurentia, and left scraps of crust that are run because continents gain and lose mass, such 1988) captures the most important aspects of part of North America, but not part of Laurentia. that over time their sizes and shapes change continental reconfi guration, albeit greatly sim- Many of these exotic terranes in the SW are greatly. Heraclitus noted that you cannot step plifi ed. The splitting apart and coming together accreted fragments of Pacifi c arcs or plateaux, twice into the same river, for new waters are of continental fragments is stochastic and can- whereas exotic terranes in the SE are orphans left ever fl owing around you. In this sense, a conti- not be characterized as truly cyclic. Continents by Gondwana when Pangea broke up. nent is like a river, forever changing. split up and come together because of stresses Where does Laurentia terminate in the south? Of course, continents do not change as fast imposed by plate interactions in the vicinity, not Some show Laurentia ending near the U.S.- as a river fl ows, but their changes are far less because of global pulsations. With this under- Mexico border, but this is an oversimplifi cation predictable. Rivers fl ow downstream, generally stood, the supercontinent cycle is useful for (Fig. 1). A recent estimate of lithospheric thick- getting larger as they move to the sea, but conti- emphasizing the transitory nature of continents ness based on seismic-wave receiver function nents are just as likely to shrink as to grow with and how reconfi gurations cause changes in sea data indicate that the “stable” part of the North time. This is because continental shape-shifting level, climate, and macroevolution. American continent is bounded to the west by manifests plate tectonic processes, which sepa- This themed issue of Geosphere, “Making the the Laramide deformation/Rocky Mountain rate as well as amalgamate crust. Continents Southern Margin of Laurentia,” looks at how the front and the Ouachita and Appalachian fronts mostly change by rifting and colliding. These margins of part of our continent were shaped. A to the south and east (Yuan and Romanowicz , processes refl ect the approach of a continent couple of questions come immediately to mind: 2010). However, Grenville-aged crust of Lau- to a subduction zone (collision) or the forma- What is Laurentia, and how is it different than the rentia extends southward in Mexico, far beyond tion of a new ocean (rifting) in the midst of a North American continent? Where is its southern the limit of the seismically defi ned stable conti- continent. These changes affect the continents margin? Laurentia is named after the Laurentian nent. The suture between Laurentia and Gond- in many ways. Continental aggrandizement craton, another name for the North American wana is the Ouachita orogen, so Coahuila is a and diminishment change surface elevations as craton. The Laurentian craton is named after Gondwanan orphan, as is stretched basement well as continental outline, forming mountains the St. Lawrence River, which fl ows over it. below coastal Texas, Louisiana, and Missis- and basins. Drainage networks must constantly This craton is exclusively Precambrian crust, sippi (Sabine, Wiggins, and Monroe uplifts). adjust, not only to changing relief due to inter- distinct in this regard from the North American Florida is also an accreted peri-Gondwanan ter- actions on the margins (and formation of new continent, which includes signifi cant tracts of rane. Along strike to the southwest in Mexico, margins), but also to the drift of the continents accreted Phanerozoic crust (Fig. 1). In contrast the crust is all accreted subduction complexes into different climate regions. to the more ancient crust of northern Laurentia, or arcs, which originated in the Pacifi c realm. Continents mostly grow by colliding and which mostly formed >1.8 Ga, that of southern West of the Ouachita front, Laurentian base- shrink by rifting. Eurasia today is the larg- Laurentia formed 1.8–1.3 Ga (Karlstrom et al., ment exists in northern Sonora and Chihua- est continent and is growing rapidly. With the 2001). Southern Laurentian crust was modifi ed hua but it does not extend past the California- recent addition of India, imminent addition by a wide range of processes, including two Coahuila transform (Mojave-Sonora megashear of Arabia and then Australia, Eurasia is well episodes of continental collision (the Grenville overprinted by the Mesozoic magmatic arc). In on its way to becoming the next superconti- orogeny ~1.1 Ga accompanying formation of this region, the Laurentia-Gondwana join (at the Geosphere; December 2010; v. 6; no. 6; p. 737–738; doi: 10.1130/GES00642.1; 1 fi gure. For permission to copy, contact [email protected] 737 © 2010 Geological Society of America Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/6/6/737/3338837/737.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 Stern et al. Figure 1. Geotectonic elements associated with the southern margin of Laurentia. Gulf of California and Gulf of Mexico closed (prior to Cenozoic and Mesozoic seafl oor spreading, respectively). Restored Yucatan-Campeche block (Y-C) positioned against Texas coastal magnetic anomaly of Mickus et al. (2009). Present displaced position of Y-C (cross-hatched) was attained by Jurassic seafl oor spreading to open the Gulf of Mexico and coordinate slip on the Tehuantepec Transform (TT) to the west. Can–Canada; Mex–Mexico. Ouachita orogen) reaches south through Chi- mometers moves slowly across the region, tia, its extensions to Australia and Baltica, and impli- huahua but butts against Phanerozoic accreted which is providing an unparalleled look into the cations for refi ning Rodinia: Precambrian Research, v. 111, p. 5–30, doi: 10.1016/S0301-9268(01)00154-1. terranes somewhere near the southern border of lithospheric and mantle structure of the region. Mickus, K., Stern, R.J., Keller, G.R., and Anthony, E.Y., Chihuahua, at the southern edge of the Meso- This themed issue draws attention to this region, 2009, Potential fi eld evidence for a volcanic rifted margin along the Texas Gulf Coast: Geology, v. 37, zoic arc. Unfortunately, critical relationships are in the expectation that the next few years will p. 387–390, doi: 10.1130/G25465A.1. hidden beneath Cretaceous and Tertiary cover, provide useful new information about the litho- Nance, R.D., Worsley, T.R., and Moody, J.B., 1988, The so no one knows exactly where the triple join spheric and upper mantle structure of the U.S. supercontinent cycle: Scientifi c American, v. 259, p. 72–79, doi: 10.1038/scientifi camerican0788-72. is between Laurentia (in the north), Gondwana part of Laurentia. Yuan, H., and Romanowicz, B., 2010, Lithospheric layering in the North American craton: Nature, v. 466, p. 1063– (eastern Mexico), and post-Ouachita accreted REFERENCES CITED terranes (to the southwest). 1068, doi: 10.1038/nature09332. This special issue is launched as Earthscope’s Karlstrom, K.E., Ahäii, K.I., Harlan, S.S., Williams, M.L., McLelland, J., and Geissman, J.W., 2001, Long-lived MANUSCRIPT RECEIVED 9 SEPTEMBER 2010 Magnetotelluric Transportable Array of seis- (1.8–1.0 Ga) convergent orogen in southern Lauren- MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED 19 SEPTEMBER 2010 738 Geosphere, December 2010 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/6/6/737/3338837/737.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Assembly, Configuration, and Break-Up History of Rodinia
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 160 (2008) 179–210 Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis Z.X. Li a,g,∗, S.V. Bogdanova b, A.S. Collins c, A. Davidson d, B. De Waele a, R.E. Ernst e,f, I.C.W. Fitzsimons g, R.A. Fuck h, D.P. Gladkochub i, J. Jacobs j, K.E. Karlstrom k, S. Lu l, L.M. Natapov m, V. Pease n, S.A. Pisarevsky a, K. Thrane o, V. Vernikovsky p a Tectonics Special Research Centre, School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia b Department of Geology, Lund University, Solvegatan 12, 223 62 Lund, Sweden c Continental Evolution Research Group, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia d Geological Survey of Canada (retired), 601 Booth Street, Ottawa, Canada K1A 0E8 e Ernst Geosciences, 43 Margrave Avenue, Ottawa, Canada K1T 3Y2 f Department of Earth Sciences, Carleton U., Ottawa, Canada K1S 5B6 g Tectonics Special Research Centre, Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia h Universidade de Bras´ılia, 70910-000 Bras´ılia, Brazil i Institute of the Earth’s Crust SB RAS, Lermontova Street, 128, 664033 Irkutsk, Russia j Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway k Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Northrop Hall University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA l Tianjin Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources, CGS, No.
    [Show full text]
  • Assembling Laurentia—Integrated Theme Sessions on Tectonic Turning Points
    Assembling Laurentia—Integrated Theme Sessions on Tectonic Turning Points Michael L. Williams, Dept. of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA, [email protected]; Dawn A. Kellett, Geological Survey of Canada–Atlantic Division, Natural Resources Canada/Government of Canada, 1 Challenger Drive, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B2Y 4A2, Canada, [email protected]; Basil Tikoff*, Dept. of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin– Madison, 1215 W. Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA, [email protected]; Steven J. Whitmeyer, Dept. of Geology and Environmental Science, James Madison University, 801 Carrier Drive, MSC 6903, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807, USA, [email protected] The North American continent records the headlined by a Pardee Symposium, which and the broader implications of, these changes, evolution of tectonic processes and tectonic will provide an overview of the tectonic evo- and to widen the scope of investigation environments from the earliest Archean to lution of Laurentia and an introduction to the beyond a particular boundary or regional geo- modern times. The continent hosts a rich concept of key “Turning Points.” Seven logical event to the scale of Laurentia itself. Archean (and possibly Hadean) record, at related topical sessions, under the general The time slices for the topical sessions are as least three great Proterozoic orogenic belts, heading “Assembling Laurentia,” will span follows (with brief explanations from each and a wide range of Phanerozoic tectonic, the GSA meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • The East Asian Jigsaw Puzzle Pangaea at Risk? from Neville Haile
    192 Nature Vol. 293 17 September 1981 ment with the known seismic refraction (Business and Technological Systems, Inc.) pretation of long-wavelength crustal fields and heat flow data. His group believes that magnetization model for the United States, in terms of a geological/geophysical the region is the site of a late Precambrian derived from Magsat scalar data, had much model, promises to contribute significantly rift which was reactivated in the Mesozoic better resolution than that using POGO to our understanding of the Earth's crust. to form an aulacogen and its model data. In the older disciplines of main-field involves thinning of the upper crust and an Although preliminary, the results dis­ modelling and studies of external fields, increase in density in the lower crust. The cussed at the meeting indicate that sep­ there are significant new developments in magnetic low is accounted for by either an aration of the measured field into its core, both analytical techniques and in our isotherm upwarp or, less likely, a litho­ crustal and external 'components' is being understanding of the physics of the field logical variation in the crust. Mayhew's achieved. The newest discipline, inter- sources. 0 The East Asian jigsaw puzzle Pangaea at risk? from Neville Haile UNTIL fairly recently, reconstructions of the world palaeogeography followed Wegener in showing Eurasia, excluding the Indian subcontinent, as a single block, with the Malay Peninsula and part or all of the Indonesian Archipelago depending from it and looking rather vulnerablel ,2. Other world palaeogeo­ graphical maps simply omit South-east Asia and most of China (see the figure)3,4.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDOVICIAN FISH from the ARABIAN PENINSULA by IVAN J
    [Palaeontology, Vol. 52, Part 2, 2009, pp. 337–342] ORDOVICIAN FISH FROM THE ARABIAN PENINSULA by IVAN J. SANSOM*, C. GILES MILLER , ALAN HEWARDà,–, NEIL S. DAVIES*,**, GRAHAM A. BOOTHà, RICHARD A. FORTEY and FLORENTIN PARIS§ *Earth Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK; e-mail: [email protected] Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK; e-mails: [email protected] and [email protected] àPetroleum Development Oman, Muscat, Oman; e-mail: [email protected] §Ge´osciences, Universite´ de Rennes, 35042 Rennes, France; e-mail: fl[email protected] –Present address: Petrogas E&P, Muscat, Oman; e-mail: [email protected] **Present address: Earth Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 3J5, Canada; e-mail: [email protected] Typescript received 25 February 2008; accepted in revised form 19 May 2008 Abstract: Over the past three decades Ordovician pteras- morphs from the Arabian margin of Gondwana. These are pidomorphs (armoured jawless fish) have been recorded among the oldest arandaspids known, and greatly extend from the fringes of the Gondwana palaeocontinent, in par- the palaeogeographical distribution of the clade around the ticular Australia and South America. These occurrences are periGondwanan margin. Their occurrence within a very dominated by arandaspid agnathans, the oldest known narrow, nearshore ecological niche suggests that similar group of vertebrates with extensive biomineralisation of Middle Ordovician palaeoenvironmental settings should be the dermoskeleton. Here we describe specimens of arandas- targeted for further sampling. pid agnathans, referable to the genus Sacabambaspis Gagnier, Blieck and Rodrigo, from the Ordovician of Key words: Ordovician, pteraspidomorphs, Gondwana pal- Oman, which represent the earliest record of pteraspido- aeocontinent, Sacabambaspis, Oman.
    [Show full text]
  • WGBH/NOVA #4220 Making North America: Origins KIRK JOHNSON
    WGBH/NOVA #4220 Making North America: Origins KIRK JOHNSON (Sant Director, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History): North America, the land that we love: it looks pretty familiar, don’t you think? Well, think again! The ground that we walk on is full of surprises, if you know where to look. 00:25 As a geologist, the Grand Canyon is perhaps the best place in the world. Every single one of these layers tells its own story about what North America was like when that layer was deposited. So, are you ready for a little time-travelling? 00:38 I’m Kirk Johnson, the director of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, and I’m taking off on the fieldtrip of a lifetime,… 00:50 Look at that rock there. That is crazy! …to find out, “How did our amazing continent get to be the way it is?” EMILY WOLIN (Geophysicist): Underneath Lake Superior, that’s about 30 miles of volcanic rock. KIRK JOHNSON: Thirty miles of volcanic rock? How did the landscape shape the creatures that lived and died here? Fourteen-foot-long fish, in Kansas. That’s what I’m telling you! 01:14 And how did we turn the rocks of our homeland… Ho-ho. Oh, man! …into riches? This thing is phenomenal. In this episode, we hunt down the clues to our continent’s epic past. 01:26 You can see new land being formed, right in front of your eyes. Why does this golf course hold the secret to the rise and fall of the Rockies? What forces nearly cracked North America in half? And is it possible that the New York City skyline… I’ve always wanted to do this.
    [Show full text]
  • (India) and Yangtze Block (South China): Paleogeographic Implications
    Neoproterozoic stratigraphic comparison of the Lesser Himalaya (India) and Yangtze block (south China): Paleogeographic implications Ganqing Jiang* Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA Linda E. Sohl Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Nicholas Christie-Blick Columbia University, Palisades, New York 10964-8000, USA ABSTRACT terpreted to correspond with a level within the Recent studies of terminal Neoproterozoic rocks (ca. 590±543 Ma) in the Lesser Him- glaciogenic interval (Fig. 2). A passive- alaya of northwestern India and the Yangtze block (south China) reveal remarkably sim- margin setting is inferred with con®dence for ilar facies assemblages and carbonate platform architecture, with distinctive karstic un- postglacial carbonate rocks on the basis of conformities at comparable stratigraphic levels. These similarities suggest that south platform scale, comparatively simple physical China may have been located close to northwestern India during late Neoproterozoic time, stratigraphic and facies architecture, and the an interpretation permitted by the available, yet sparse paleomagnetic data. Additional thickness of successions, with no evidence for parallels in older rocks of both blocksÐsimilar rift-related siliciclastic-volcanic successions either syndepositional tectonism or igneous overlying metamorphic basement, and comparable glaciogenic intervals of possibly Stur- activity. Figure 2 summarizes pertinent litho- tian and Marinoan
    [Show full text]
  • North China Craton: the Conjugate Margin for Northwestern Laurentia in Rodinia Jikai Ding1,2, Shihong Zhang1,3*, David A.D
    https://doi.org/10.1130/G48483.1 Manuscript received 7 October 2020 Revised manuscript received 27 December 2020 Manuscript accepted 12 January 2021 © 2021 The Authors. Gold Open Access: This paper is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Published online 22 March 2021 North China craton: The conjugate margin for northwestern Laurentia in Rodinia Jikai Ding1,2, Shihong Zhang1,3*, David A.D. Evans2, Tianshui Yang1, Haiyan Li1, Huaichun Wu1 and Jianping Chen3 1 State Key Laboratory of Biogeology and Environmental Geology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China 2 Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA 3 School of Earth Sciences and Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China ABSTRACT ern NCC and northwestern Laurentia (present In the Rodinia supercontinent, Laurentia is placed at the center because it was flanked coordinates) was proposed (Fu et al., 2015; by late Neoproterozoic rifted margins; however, the conjugate margin for western Laurentia Zhao et al., 2020) but required rigorous testing is still enigmatic. In this study, new paleomagnetic results have been obtained from 15 ca. by coeval pairs of high-quality poles with pre- 775 Ma mafic dikes in eastern Hebei Province, North China craton (NCC). Stepwise thermal cise age constraints. In this study, we report a demagnetization revealed a high-temperature component, directed northeast or southwest new high-quality paleomagnetic pole obtained with shallow inclinations, with unblocking temperatures of as high as 580 °C. Rock magne- from ca. 775 Ma mafic dikes in the eastern He- tism suggests the component is carried by single-domain and pseudo-single-domain magnetite bei Province, NCC.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Biogeography of the Late Cretaceous Vertebrates of India: Comparison of Geophysical and Paleontological Data
    Khosla, A. and Lucas, S.G., eds., 2016, Cretaceous Period: Biotic Diversity and Biogeography. New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science Bulletin 71. 317 HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY OF THE LATE CRETACEOUS VERTEBRATES OF INDIA: COMPARISON OF GEOPHYSICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL DATA OMKAR VERMA1, ASHU KHOSLA2, FRANCISCO J. GOIN3 AND JASDEEP KAUR2 1Geology Discipline Group, School of Sciences, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi – 110 068, India, e-mail: omkarverma@ ignou.ac.in; 2Department of Geology, Centre for Advanced Studies, Panjab University, Sector-14, Chandigarh – 160014, India, e-mail: [email protected], e-mail: [email protected]; 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas and División Paleontología Vertebrados, Museo de Ciencias Naturales de La Plata, B1900FWA La Plata, Argentina, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract—The Cretaceous was a special time for the Indian plate as it was separated from Gondwana landmasses and started its northward journey across the Tethys Sea towards the Equator. The northward movement of this plate implied shifting latitudes and climate belts, until it finally collided with Asia during the early Cenozoic. Geophysical data and plate tectonic models show that after splitting from Gondwana, the Indian plate remained as an isolated continent for more than 45 Ma during the Cretaceous; thus, it predicts a remarkable biotic endemism for the continent. Paleontological data on the Cretaceous vertebrates of India is best known for Maastrichtian time; in turn, the pre-Maastrichtian record is very poor—it contains very few fossils of fishes and marine reptiles. The Maastrichtian fossil record comprises vertebrates of Gondwana and Laurasian affinities and some endemic, ancient lineages as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Accepted Manuscript
    Accepted Manuscript Reconstructing South China in Phanerozoic and Precambrian supercontinents Peter A. Cawood, Guochun Zhao, Jinlong Yao, Wei Wang, Yajun Xu, Yuejun Wang PII: S0012-8252(17)30298-2 DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.001 Reference: EARTH 2430 To appear in: Earth-Science Reviews Received date: 19 January 2017 Revised date: 17 May 2017 Accepted date: 2 June 2017 Please cite this article as: Peter A. Cawood, Guochun Zhao, Jinlong Yao, Wei Wang, Yajun Xu, Yuejun Wang , Reconstructing South China in Phanerozoic and Precambrian supercontinents, Earth-Science Reviews (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.06.001 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Reconstructing South China in Phanerozoic and Precambrian supercontinents Peter A. Cawood1, 2, Guochun Zhao3, Jinlong Yao3, Wei Wang4, Yajun Xu4 and Yuejun Wang5 1 School of Earth, Atmosphere & Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia; email: [email protected] 2 Department of Earth Sciences, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, KY16 9AL, UK 3 Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China 4 School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, 430074, China, 5 School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 2 Abstract The history of the South China Craton and the constituent Yangtze and Cathaysia blocks are directly linked to Earth’s Phanerozoic and Precambrian record of supercontinent assembly and dispersal.
    [Show full text]
  • Supercontinent Reconstruction the Palaeomagnetically Viable, Long
    Geological Society, London, Special Publications The palaeomagnetically viable, long-lived and all-inclusive Rodinia supercontinent reconstruction David A. D. Evans Geological Society, London, Special Publications 2009; v. 327; p. 371-404 doi:10.1144/SP327.16 Email alerting click here to receive free email alerts when new articles cite this service article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or part of this article request Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes Downloaded by on 21 December 2009 © 2009 Geological Society of London The palaeomagnetically viable, long-lived and all-inclusive Rodinia supercontinent reconstruction DAVID A. D. EVANS Department of Geology & Geophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8109, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: Palaeomagnetic apparent polar wander (APW) paths from the world’s cratons at 1300–700 Ma can constrain the palaeogeographic possibilities for a long-lived and all-inclusive Rodinia supercontinent. Laurentia’s APW path is the most complete and forms the basis for super- position by other cratons’ APW paths to identify possible durations of those cratons’ inclusion in Rodinia, and also to generate reconstructions that are constrained both in latitude and longitude relative to Laurentia. Baltica reconstructs adjacent to the SE margin of Greenland, in a standard and geographically ‘upright’ position, between c. 1050 and 600 Ma. Australia reconstructs adja- cent to the pre-Caspian margin of Baltica, geographically ‘inverted’ such that cratonic portions of Queensland are juxtaposed with that margin via collision at c. 1100 Ma. Arctic North America reconstructs opposite to the CONgo þ Sa˜o Francisco craton at its DAmaride–Lufilian margin (the ‘ANACONDA’ fit) throughout the interval 1235–755 Ma according to palaeomag- netic poles of those ages from both cratons, and the reconstruction was probably established during the c.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of North America Indiana in Its Plate Tectonic Setting
    Department of Geological Sciences | Indiana University Geol G-308 (c) 2012, P. David Polly Paleontology and Geology of Indiana A short history of North America Indiana in its plate tectonic setting P. David Polly Department of Geological Sciences Indiana University Bloomington, Indiana 47405 USA [email protected] Pangea, showing location of Indiana in the Permian Department of Geological Sciences | Indiana University Geol G-308 (c) 2012, P. David Polly Paleontology and Geology of Indiana Objectives 1. Introduction to Geological Time Scale 2. Structure of the Earth, formation of rocks and continents 3. Early history of the Earth 4. Continental history of the Phanerozoic 5. Oxygen, carbon dioxide, and sea level through the Phanerozoic Department of Geological Sciences | Indiana University Geol G-308 (c) 2012, P. David Polly Paleontology and Geology of Indiana Era Period Epoch Age (millions of years ago) Holocene Quaternary Pleistocene Basic geological time scale 2.6 Pliocene Neogene Quiz next Friday (25 January) Miocene 23 Oligocene Cenozoic Eocene Paleogene Paleocene Mnemonic for Paleozoic Periods: 65 Cretaceous 145 Jurassic Cold Cambrian 199 Mesozoic Triassic Phanerozoic Oysters Ordovician 251 Permian 299 Seldom Silurian Pennsylvanian 318 Mississippian Develop Devonian Carboniferous 359 Devonian Many Mississippian 416 Paleozoic Silurian Precious Pennsylvanian 444 Ordovician 488 Pearls Permian Cambrian 542 Proterozoic 2.5 billion Archean 4.6 billion Precambrian Department of Geological Sciences | Indiana University Geol G-308 (c) 2012,
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Early History of the Pacific Margin of South America: Their Influence on the Development of the Andean Cordillera
    Second ISAG, Oxford (UK),21-23/9/1993 505 THE ORIGIN AND EARLY HISTORY OF THE PACIFIC MARGIN OF SOUTH AMERICA: THEIR INFLUENCE ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANDEAN CORDILLERA Ian W. D. DaZIEL Institute for Geophysics 8701 Mopac Boulevard Austin,Texas 78759-8397 USA For nearlya century, variousaspects of the foundation of the Andean Cordillera haveled geologists (e.g. Burckhart, 1902; Steinmann, 1923; Dalmayrac et al., 1980) to speculate on the existence of a major continent to theWest (present coordinates) of South America during the Paleozoic. Recently Moores (1991) and Dalziel(l991) have revived earlier ideas (Eisbacher, 1985; Bell and Jefferson, 1987) that the Pacific margins of North America and East Antarctica-Australia may been have juxtaposed in the late Precambrian. This has ledto the idea that Laurentia, the Precambrian core of North America, may have “broken out” from between East Antarctica-Australia and South America during the Neoproterozoicto Cambrian amalgamation of Gondwanaland (Dalziel, 1991; Hoffman, 1991). According to this hypothesis the Neoproterozoic opening of the Pacific Ocean basin was balanced ona globe of constant radius by the closure of several ocean basins between the cratons that amalgamatedto form Gondwana, and “southernIapetus” opened at the end of the Neoproterozoic between Laurentia and the coalescing cratons of West Gondwana (Dalziel, 1992a,b). Paleomagnetic data are compatible with clockwise rotation of Laurentia around the Pacific margin of Gondwana during the Paleozoicen route to final “docking” with northwestern Africa (present coordinates) to form Pangea (Dalziel, 1991, Fig. 2). Indeed several lines of evidence suggest that, following initial separation in the latest Neoproterozoicto Early Cambrian, Laurentia may have tectonically interacted with the Pacific marginof South America in the courseof this motion @alla Saldaet al., 1992a,b; Dalzielet al., 1992 and in press).
    [Show full text]