DOCSLIB.ORG

Review Article Hepatotoxicity of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review Article Hepatotoxicity of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Hindawi International Journal of Hepatology Volume 2018, Article ID 5253623, 13 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5253623 Review Article Hepatotoxicity of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Pajaree Sriuttha , Buntitabhon Sirichanchuen, and Unchalee Permsuwan Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Tailand Correspondence should be addressed to Pajaree Sriuttha; [email protected] Received 24 July 2017; Revised 25 September 2017; Accepted 17 October 2017; Published 15 January 2018 Academic Editor: Maria Buti Copyright © 2018 Pajaree Sriuttha et al. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. Nonsteroidal anti-infammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most widely used medication in several countries, including Tailand. NSAIDs have been associated with hepatic side efects; however, the frequency of these side efects is uncertain. Aim of the Review. To systematically review published literature on randomized, controlled trials that assessed the risk of clinically signifcant hepatotoxicity associated with NSAIDs. Methods. Searches of bibliographic databases EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were conducted up to July 30, 2016, to identify randomized controlled trials of ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, piroxicam, meloxicam, mefenamic acid, indomethacin, celecoxib, and etoricoxib in adults with any disease that provide information on hepatotoxicity outcomes. Results. Among the 698 studies, 18 studies met the selection criteria. However, only 8 studies regarding three NSAIDs (celecoxib, etoricoxib, and diclofenac) demonstrated clinically signifcant hepatotoxic evidence based on hepatotoxicity justifcation criteria. Of all the hepatotoxicity events found from the above-mentioned three NSAIDs, diclofenac had −2 −2 the highest proportion, which ranged from 0.015 to 4.3 (×10 ), followed by celecoxib, which ranged from 0.13 to 0.38 (×10 ), and −2 etoricoxib, which ranged from 0.005 to 0.930 (×10 ). Conclusion. Diclofenac had higher rates of hepatotoxic evidence compared to other NSAIDs. Hepatotoxic evidence is mostly demonstrated as aminotransferase elevation, while liver-related hospitalization or discontinuation was very low. 1. Introduction hepatic side efects ranging from asymptomatic elevations in serum aminotransferase levels and hepatitis with jaundice to Nonsteroidal anti-infammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the fulminant liver failure and death [5]. In 2008, lumiracoxib most widely used medication in several countries, including was withdrawn from the market in several countries, mostly Tailand, for treatment of symptoms of pain and infamma- duetoitspotentialtocauseseverehepaticfailure[6],which tion, such as osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis is classifed as one type of hepatotoxicity. (RA) [1, 2]. It has been reported that 12.1% of the US Drug-induced hepatotoxicity leads to abnormalities in population took NSAIDs at least three times per week for liver tests or liver dysfunction. An elevation of ALT, ALP or more than 3 months [3]. In Tailand, NSAIDs are both widely conjugatedbilirubinwasconfrmedas“> 2 × ULN” according prescribed by physicians and available for purchase over-the- to CIOMS criteria [7, 8]. At present, the thresholds and counter without a physician’s prescription in drug stores. the cutofs for ALT have been modifed; the 5 × ULN has BasedonthedataofTaiFoodandDrugAdministration been suggested in a recent state-of-the art paper written by (Tai FDA) during 1984–2016, medications used for muscu- international experts [9]. loskeletal system disorders were the second-most common Hepatotoxicity is more frequently discovered during cause of adverse drug events (ADE), resulting in 14% of all postmarketing studies or, even, much later. Tis is due to reported ADEs. Ibuprofen and diclofenac were listed among the slightly low incidence rate of NSAIDs associated with the top 15 drugs to cause ADE [4]. While the major adverse hepatotoxicity[5,10,11].Tesamplesizeofthepremarketing efects of NSAIDs such as gastrointestinal mucosa injury studies designed to assess the efcacy or safety of NSAIDs arewellknown,NSAIDshavealsobeenassociatedwith might not be sufcient to provide the true incidence rate 2 International Journal of Hepatology of hepatotoxicity. Although clinically apparent liver injury were elevation of transaminases (alanine aminotransferase from NSAIDs is rare (∼1–10 cases per 100,000 prescriptions) or aspartate aminotransferase) to >3 × ULN or ALP to >2 [5], NSAIDs are consumed in massive amounts worldwide; × ULN threshold as a signifcant elevation because it is the hence, despite the overall low incidence rate of NSAID- most commonly used initial screen for hepatic injury [35]. induced hepatotoxicity, their widespread use makes them an Terefore, randomized controlled trials of adults (age ≥18 important cause of drug-induced liver injury. years) with any diseases were included for data extraction if In2005,Rostometal.[12]conductedasystematicre- (1) the studies described at least one of the following NSAIDs: view of randomized controlled trials (RCT) of diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen, diclofenac, piroxicam, meloxicam, naproxen, ibuprofen, celecoxib, rofecoxib, valdecoxib, and mefenamic acid, indomethacin, celecoxib, and etoricoxib and meloxicam in arthritis patients. Te authors defned hepatic (2) hepatotoxicity outcomes were reported as the number toxicity as aminotransferase elevations > 3 × ULN, liver- of events related to at least one of the following outcomes: related drug discontinuation, serious hepatic adverse events, elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 3 × ULN, liver-related hospitalizations, and liver-related deaths. Tey elevation of ALT > 3 × ULN, elevation of ALT, AST or both > concluded that diclofenac and rofecoxib had higher rates of 3 × ULN, elevation of ALP > 2 × ULN, Hy’s case (ALT > 3 × aminotransferases, three times greater than ULN when com- ULN and total bilirubin > 1.5 × ULN), liver-related treatment pared with either placebo or other NSAIDs. However, none discontinuations, and liver-related hospitalization. of these studies found high rates of serious hepatic adverse Eligibility assessment was performed independently in events,hospitalization,ordeath.Teseresultsareinconcor- an unblinded standardized manner by two reviewers (PS dance with the fndings reported by Rubenstein and Laine [11] and BS) to identify potential relevant articles. Disagreement who evaluated the incidence and risk of serious liver-related between reviewers was resolved by consensus. All duplicated NSAID toxicity using published literature for population- studies and nonrelevant articles were excluded. Data extrac- based observational studies (case-control, controlled cohort, tion and quality assessment were then performed for all andsinglecohortpopulation-basedstudies).Teyfoundthat included studies (Figure 1). the incidence rate of hepatotoxicity associated with hospital admission was in the range of 3.1–23.4/100000 patient-years. 2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment. Te included Te incidence rate of hepatotoxicity associated with NSAIDs, full text articles were reviewed, and data related to study also obtained from a retrospective study, was found to be in characteristics and safety outcome were extracted. Ten, all the range of 1.4–9/100000 patient-years [13–15]. the extracted data were entered into a standardized prepared Terefore, randomized, controlled trials that assessed table. the risk of clinically signifcant hepatotoxicity associated Te data were extracted from each of the included studies with NSAIDs that are commonly used in Tailand were according to the following criteria: (1) characteristics of systematically reviewed. Tose NSAIDs included ibupro- the trial participants (including gender, age, comorbidity, fen, naproxen, diclofenac, piroxicam, meloxicam, mefenamic alcohol use, and indication of NSAIDs); (2) type of inter- acid, indomethacin, celecoxib, and etoricoxib. vention (including type, dose, duration, and frequency of the NSAID); versus placebo, or versus another NSAID; and 2. Methods (3)typeofsafetyoutcomesthatweremeasured,suchas elevation of AST or ALT < 3 × ULN, elevation of AST 2.1. Search Methods for Identifcation of Studies. Te relevant or ALT > 3 × ULN, elevated total bilirubin > 2 × ULN, articles were identifed by searching the following databases elevation of ALP > 2 × ULN, serum ALT elevation > 3 × ULN for data up to July 30, 2016: the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, accompanied by a serum bilirubin elevation > 2 × ULN (Hy’s and PubMed. A comprehensive search was systematically case), liver-related treatment discontinuation, hospitalization performed, and the search was limited to the English duetohepaticcauseandacuteliverfailure,transplant,or language. Te electronic search terms are summarized in death. supplement 1. Manual searching for relevant publications To ascertain the validity of the eligible RCTs, the method- from extracted articles was also performed. ological quality of the included studies was assessed inde- pendently by two reviewers (Pajaree Sriuttha and Buntitab- 2.2. Study Selection. Atotalof9NSAIDsthatarecom- honSirichanchuen)usingtheJadadscore[36].TeJadad monly used in Tailand were chosen. Tere were ibupro- score
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SBARD – Lithium Nsaids
    SBARD in Relation to Potentially Dangerous Interaction Between Lithium and Anti- Inflammatory Drugs A number of medication incidents have been reported recently concerning the prescribing and administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs S (NSAIDs) to patients on lithium. Situation Co-administration of a NSAID or cyclo-oxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor, with lithium increases the risk of lithium toxicity In the last 6 months (Oct.11-Mar.12) there have been 3 Datix incident reports concerning the prescription of a NSAID for in-patients stabilised on lithium. B In each case the NSAID was prescribed “as required”, which increases the risk Background of lithium toxicity due to irregular administration with no increase in lithium monitoring frequency. NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors reduce the renal excretion of lithium via their A action on renal prostaglandins, resulting in increased plasma lithium levels. The level of increase is unpredictable (from 10-400%), and the onset of effect is Assessment variable (few days to several months). Risks are increased in patients with impaired renal function, renal artery stenosis or heart failure, and who are dehydrated or on a low salt diet. Co-prescription of NSAIDs or COX-2 inhibitors with lithium is not an absolute R contra-indication, but should be undertaken with extreme caution and only Recommendation when clinically essential. The risk of lithium toxicity is increased with “as required” or intermittent dosing (e.g. when used for menorrhagia), when the effects are less predictable – regular dosing
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Drug List PARECOXIB SODIUM
    Emerging Drug List PARECOXIB SODIUM NO. 10 MAY 2001 Generic (Trade Name): Parecoxib sodium Manufacturer: Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc. Indication: For peri-operative pain relief Current Regulatory Parecoxib is currently under review at Health Canada and the Food and Drug Status: Administration in the U.S. They are expecting approval in the fourth quarter of 2001. It is not marketed in any country at this time Description: Parecoxib is the first parenteral cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) selective inhibitor to be developed. It is a water-soluble prodrug that is rapidly hydrolyzed to valdecoxib (the active COX-2 inhibitor). Valdecoxib's affinity for COX-2 versus COX-1 is 90 times greater than celecoxib and 34,000 times greater than ketorolac. Once injected, peak concentrations of valdecoxib are attained in 10 to 20 minutes. Valdecoxib has a half-life of eight to 10 hours. Current Treatment: Currently, the only other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent that is available as an injection is ketorolac. Ketorolac is used in some centres for peri-operative pain management, however opioids are the main class of agents used for this indication. Ketorolac has been associated with a relatively high incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) side effects, including severe cases of hemorrhage. Cost: There is no information available on the cost of parecoxib. Evidence: Parecoxib has been compared to ketorolac and morphine in clinical trials. Parecoxib at a dose of 20 and 40 mg/day IV, were compared to ketorolac, 30 mg/day IV and morphine, 4 mg/day or placebo in 202 women undergoing hysterectomy. Both doses of parecoxib were comparable to ketorolac for relieving postoperative pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Validation of an Ultra Performance Liquid
    DOI: 10.4274/tjps.76588 Turk J Pharm Sci 2017;14(1):1-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Development and Validation of an Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography Method for the Determination of Dexketoprofen Trometamol, Salicylic Acid and Diclofenac Sodium Deksketoprofen Trometamol, Salisilik Asit ve Diklofenak Sodyum Etkin Maddeleri için Ultra Performanslı Sıvı Kromatografisi Yönteminin Geliştirilmesi ve Validasyonu Sibel İLBASMIŞ TAMER Gazi University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Ankara, Turkey ABSTRACT Objectives: A simple, fast, accurate and precise method has been developed for the determination of dexketoprofen trometamol (DKP), salicylic acid (SA) and diclofenac sodium (DIC) in the drug solutions using ultra high performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). Materials and Methods: UPLC method is highly reliable and sensitive method to quantify the amount of the active ingredient and the method is validated according to ICH guidelines. Results: The developed method is found to be precise, accurate, specific and selective. The method was also found to be linear and reproducible. The value of limit of dedection (LOD) of DKP, SA, DIC were found 0.00325 µg/mL, 0.0027 µg/mL and 0.0304 µg/mL, respectively. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) of DKP, SA and DIC were found 0.00985 µg/mL, 0.0081 µg/mL and 0.0920 µg/mL, respectively. Conclusion: Proposed methods can be successfully applicable to the pharmaceutical preparation containing the above mentioned drugs (dexketoprofen trometamol, salicylic acid and diclofenac sodium). Even very small amounts of active substance can be analyzed and validations can be performed easily. Key words: Dexketoprofen trometamol, salicylic acid, diclofenac sodium, UPLC, validation ÖZ Amaç: Deksketoprofen trometamol (DKP), salisilik asit (SA) ve diklofenak sodyumun (DIC) ilaç çözeltisindeki analizi için ultra yüksek basınçlı sıvı kromatografisi (UPLC) kullanılarak basit, hızlı, doğru ve kesin bir yöntem geliştirilmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • New Restrictions on Celecoxib (Celebrex) Use and the Withdrawal of Valdecoxib (Bextra)
    Early release, published at www.cmaj.ca on April 15, 2005. Subject to revision. HEALTH AND DRUG ALERTS P RACTICE New restrictions on celecoxib (Celebrex) use and the withdrawal of valdecoxib (Bextra) Early release, published at www.cmaj.ca on Apr. 15, 2005. Subject to revision. Reason for posting: Coxibs, v. 0.5%; risk ratio 3.7, 95% CI the class of NSAIDs that selec- 1.0–13.5).2 Amid concerns about Table 1: The degree of inhibition of COX-2 relative tively inhibit cyclooxygenase 2 reports of severe cutaneous reac- to COX-1 for various NSAIDs (COX-2), were designed to re- tions (Stevens–Johnson syn- NSAID type COX-2 selectivity* duce joint pain and inflamma- drome, erythema multiforme, tion without causing the gastric toxic epidermal necrolysis) COX-2 selective inhibitors epithelial adverse effects typical among patients taking valde- Rofecoxib 80 of nonselective NSAIDs. Rofe- coxib,5 the drug was removed Etodolac 23 coxib (Vioxx) was withdrawn from the market. Meloxicam 11 from the market in September Celecoxib 9 2004 over concerns about car- What to do: COX-2 inhibitors Nonselective NSAIDs diovascular adverse effects, and appear to increase the risk of car- Diclofenac 4 key safety trials involving cele- diovascular adverse events in a Sulindac 3 coxib (Celebrex)1 and valdecoxib dose-related fashion, and all pa- Piroxicam 2 (Bextra)2 have recently been tients should be informed of this. Ibuprofen 0.4 published. Health Canada now Calculating the patient’s baseline Naproxen 0.3 recommends new restrictions on risk of cardiovascular disease Indomethacin 0.2 celecoxib use, and valdecoxib (e.g., with Framingham risk cal- Ketorolac 0.003 has been taken off the market.3 culators) may be wise, and cele- Note: COX = cyclooxygenase.
    [Show full text]
  • Spondyloarthritis: NMA on Pain Outcome RR111467
    NICE CGTSU Spondyloarthritis: NMA on Pain Outcome RR111467 Spondyloarthritis: NMA on pain outcome CGTSU, Bristol (Edna Keeney and Sofia Dias) The purpose of this analysis was to estimate the comparative effectiveness of the following pharmacological interventions for management of pain associated with axial spondyloarthritis: 1. Indomethacin (Reference) 2. Diclofenac 3. Sulindac 4. Fenoprofen 5. Ketoprofen 6. Flurbiprofen 7. Tenoxicam 8. Piroxicam 9. Celecoxib 200mg 10. Celecoxib 400mg 11. Aceclofenac 12. Naproxen 13. Enteric coated Naproxen 14. Etoricoxib 15. Tolfenamic acid 16. Meloxicam 15mg 17. Placebo 23 studies were included in the analyses. The network diagram is shown in Figure 1. Edna Keeney 1 13/10/2015 NICE CGTSU Spondyloarthritis: NMA on Pain Outcome RR111467 Figure 1. Network Diagram for pain outcome Pain Indomethacin Placebo Diclofenac Meloxicam 15mg Sulindac Tolfenamic acid Fenoprofen Etoricoxib Ketoprofen Enteric coated naproxen Flurbiprofen Naproxen Tenoxicam Piroxicam Aceclofenac Celecoxib 400mg Celecoxib 200mg METHODS In order to take all trial information into consideration, Mixed Treatment Comparison meta-analytic techniques, also termed Network meta-analysis (NMA), were employed. NMA is a generalization of standard pairwise meta-analysis for A versus B trials, to data structures that include, for example, A versus B, B versus C, and A versus C trials.1-3 A basic assumption of NMA methods is that direct and indirect evidence estimate the same parameter, that is, the relative effect between A and B measured directly
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Etoricoxib, Celecoxib, Lumiracoxib, Non-Selective Nsaids, and Acetaminophen in Osteoarthritis: a Mixed Treatment Comparison W.B
    6 The Open Rheumatology Journal, 2012, 6, 6-20 Open Access Efficacy of Etoricoxib, Celecoxib, Lumiracoxib, Non-Selective NSAIDs, and Acetaminophen in Osteoarthritis: A Mixed Treatment Comparison W.B. Stam1, J.P. Jansen2 and S.D. Taylor*,3 1Mapi Group, Houten, The Netherlands 2Mapi Group, Boston, MA, USA 3Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy of etoricoxib, lumiracoxib, celecoxib, non-selective (ns) NSAIDs and acetaminophen in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) Methods: Randomized placebo controlled trials investigating the effects of acetaminophen 4000mg, diclofenac 150mg, naproxen 1000mg, ibuprofen 2400mg, celecoxib 100-400mg, lumiracoxib 100-400mg, and etoricoxib 30-60mg with treatment duration of at least two weeks were identified with a systematic literature search. The endpoints of interest were pain, physical function and patient global assessment of disease status (PGADS). Pain and physical function reported on different scales (VAS or LIKERT) were translated into effect sizes (ES). An ES 0.2 - 0.5 was defined as a “small” treatment effect, whereas ES of 0.5 – 0.8 and > 0.8 were defined as “moderate” and “large”, respectively. A negative effect indicated superior effects of the treatment group compared to the control group. Results of all trials were analyzed simultaneously with a Bayesian mixed treatment comparison. Results: There is a >95% probability that etoricoxib (30 or 60mg) shows the greatest improvement in pain and physical function of all interventions compared. ESs of etoricoxib 30mg relative to placebo, celecoxib 200mg, ibuprofen 2400mg, and diclofenac 150mg were -0.66 (95% Credible Interval -0.83; -0.49), -0.32 (-0.50; -0.14), -0.25 (-0.53; 0.03), and -0.17 (-0.41; 0.08), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Analgesic Effect of Etoricoxib Compared to Ibuprofen on Post Endodontic Pain
    Analgesic Effect of Etoricoxib Compared to Ibuprofen on Post Endodontic Pain Zahra-Sadat Madani1, Ali Akbar Moghadamnia2, Ali Panahi3, Arash Poorsattar Bejeh Mir4 1Department of Endodontics, Dentistry School, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran Province, Iran. 2Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran Province, Iran. 3General Dentist, Private Practice, Mazandaran Province, Babol, Iran. 4Dental Materials Research Center, Dentistry School, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Mazandaran Province, Iran. Abstract Aims: Etoricoxib is a second-generation selective COX-2 inhibitor. There are a few researches investigating analgesic effect of Etoricoxib in dentistry. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, active-control study included sixty patients with clinical pulpal diagnosis of necrosis of the first mandibular molar and an associated periapical radiolucency who experienced severe pain (more than 60 out of 100 in scale of Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The patients were equally randomized into four groups, who received 60 mg etoricoxib (group 1), 90 mg etoricoxib (group 2), 120 mg etoricoxib (group 3), and 400 mg ibuprofen (group 4). All patients randomly received a single dose of the drug after the first session of the root canal therapy. Using VAS, the severity of pain was recorded 2, 4, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the drug was administered. Results: Changing trends of pain over the time was significant for all groups (P=0.003). In addition, there was not a significant difference between various study arms (P=0.146). Conclusion: The results showed that ibuprofen had a comparable effect with various dosage of etoricoxib and may remain as the choice analgesic for dental pulpal pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Etoricoxib in Patients with Reactions to Nsaids
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE Safety of Etoricoxib in Patients With Reactions to NSAIDs O Quercia, F Emiliani, FG Foschi, GF Stefanini Allergology High Specialty Unit, General Medicine, Faenza Hospital, AUSL Ravenna, Italy ■ Abstract Background: Adverse reactions to nonsteroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are a frequently reported problem due to the fact that these molecules are often used for control of pain and infl ammation. Although the use of selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase (COX) 2 helps to prevent some of these adverse reactions, they can have cardiac side effects when taken for prolonged periods. Here we report the safety and tolerability of etoricoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor with fewer cardiovascular effects, in patients with adverse reactions to NSAIDs. Patients and methods: We performed placebo-controlled oral challenge with etoricoxib in 65 patients with previous adverse reactions to NSAIDs: 13 to salicylates, 18 to arylpropionic acids, 10 to arylacetic acid, 12 to oxicam and derivates, 8 to pyrazolones, and 4 to acetaminophen (paracetamol). The reported symptoms were urticaria or angioedema in 69%, rhinitis in 3%, and 1 case of anaphylactic shock (1.5%). The challenge was done using the placebo on the fi rst day, half dosage of etoricoxib (45 mg) on the second day, and the therapeutic dose of 90 mg on the third day. The challenge was done in the outpatient department of the hospital and the subjects were monitored for a further 4 to 6 hours after challenge. Results: Oral challenge with etoricoxib was well tolerated in 97% of the patients. Only 2 systemic reactions were reported during the challenge test.
    [Show full text]
  • Etoricoxib 30Mg, 60Mg, 90Mg and 120Mg Film-Coated Tablets
    Package leaflet: Information for the user Etoricoxib 30mg, 60mg, 90mg and 120mg Film-coated Tablets etoricoxib Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start • you have diabetes, high cholesterol, or are a smoker. These taking this medicine because it contains important can increase your risk of heart disease. information for you. • you are a woman trying to become pregnant. • Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. • you are over 65 years of age. • If you have any further questions, ask your doctor or If you are not sure if any of the above apply to you, talk to your pharmacist. doctor before taking etoricoxib to see if this medicine is • This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass suitable for you. it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. Etoricoxib works equally well in older and younger adult • If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor or patients. If you are over 65 years of age, your doctor will want pharmacist. This includes any possible side effects not to appropriately keep a check on you. No dosage adjustment is listed in this leaflet. See section 4. necessary for patients over 65 years of age. • The full name of this medicine is Etoricoxib 30mg, 60mg, 90mg and 120mg Film-coated Tablets but within this Children and adolescents Do not give this medicine to children and adolescents under 16 leaflet it will be referred to as Etoricoxib Tablets. years of age. What is in this leaflet Other medicines and Etoricoxib Tablets 1 What Etoricoxib Tablets are and what they are Tell your doctor or pharmacist if you are taking, have recently used for taken or might take any other medicines, including medicines 2 What you need to know before you take obtained without a prescription.
    [Show full text]
  • Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
    Non Steroidal Anti‐inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) 4 signs of inflammation • Redness ‐ due to local vessel dilatation • Heat ‐ due to local vessel dilatation • Swelling – due to influx of plasma proteins and phagocytic cells into the tissue spaces • Pain – due to local release of enzymes and increased tissue pressure NSAIDs • Cause relief of pain ‐. analgesic • Suppress the signs and symptoms of inflammation. • Exert antipyretic action. • Useful in pain related to inflammation. Esp for superficial/integumental pain . Classification of NSAIDs • Salicylates: aspirin, Sodium salicylate & diflunisal. • Propionic acid derivatives: ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen. • Aryl acetic acid derivatives: diclofenac, ketorolac • Indole derivatives: indomethacin, sulindac • Alkanones: Nabumetone. • Oxicams: piroxicam, tenoxicam Classification of NSAIDs ….. • Anthranilic acid derivatives (fenamates): mefenamic acid and flufenamic acid. • Pyrazolone derivatives: phenylbutazone, oxyphenbutazone, azapropazone (apazone) & dipyrone (novalgine). • Aniline derivatives (analgesic only): paracetamol. Clinical Classif. • Non selective Irreversible COX inhibitors • Non slective Reversible COX inhibitors • Preferential COX 2 inhibitors • 10‐20 fold cox 2 selective • meloxicam, etodolac, nabumetone • Selective COX 2 inhibitors • > 50 fold COX ‐2 selective • Celecoxib, Etoricoxib, Rofecoxib, Valdecoxib • COX 3 Inhibitor? PCM Cyclooxygenase‐1 (COX‐1): -constitutively expressed in wide variety of cells all over the body. -"housekeeping enzyme" -ex. gastric cytoprotection, hemostasis Cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2): -inducible enzyme -dramatically up-regulated during inflammation (10-18X) -constitutive : maintains renal blood flow and renal electrolyte homeostasis Salicylates Acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin). Kinetics: • Well absorbed from the stomach, more from upper small intestine. • Distributed all over the body, 50‐80% bound to plasma protein (albumin). • Metabolized to acetic acid and salicylates (active metabolite). • Salicylate is conjugated with glucuronic acid and glycine. • Excreted by the kidney.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic Profiling of Murine Plasma Reveals an Unexpected Biomarker In
    Metabolic profiling of murine plasma reveals an unexpected biomarker in rofecoxib-mediated cardiovascular events Jun-Yan Liua, Ning Lib, Jun Yanga, Nan Lic, Hong Qiub, Ding Aia,c, Nipavan Chiamvimonvatb, Yi Zhuc, and Bruce D. Hammocka,1 aDepartment of Entomology and University of California-Davis Cancer Center and bDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; and cDepartment of Physiology, Beijing University, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China Contributed by Bruce D. Hammock, August 6, 2010 (sent for review June 16, 2010) Chronic administration of high levels of selective COX-2 inhibitors infarction (MI), hypertension, and heart failure has also been ob- (coxibs), particularly rofecoxib, valdecoxib, and parecoxib, increases served to be associated with the administration of the nonaspirin risk for cardiovascular disease. Understanding the possibly multiple conventional NSAIDs, including but not limited to diclofenac, mechanisms underlying these adverse cardiovascular events is critical ibuprofen, naproxen, and indomethacin (8–12). In addition, there for evaluating the risks and benefits of coxibs and for development of could be rofecoxib-specific events such as the facile formation of safer coxibs. The current understanding of these mechanisms is likely a cardiotoxic maleic anhydride derivative from rofecoxib that may incomplete. Using a metabolomics approach, we demonstrate that contribute to its adverse effects (13). This hypothesis fails to ex- oral administration of rofecoxib for 3 mo results in a greater than 120- plain the increased risk in the cardiovascular system from other fold higher blood level of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE), nonaspirin NSAIDs. Thus, current mechanisms provide an in- fi which correlates with a signi cantly shorter tail bleeding time in complete explanation for cardiovascular problems associated with a murine model.
    [Show full text]
  • Inflammatory Drugs
    Solubility of Nonsteroidal Anti- diflunisal, etoricoxib, fenbufen, fentiazac, flufenamic inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in acid, flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, indomethacin, ketopro- Neat Organic Solvents and Organic fen, ketorolac, lornoxicam, mefenamic acid, melox- Solvent Mixtures iam, nabumetone, naproxen, niflumic acid, nimesulide, phenylbutazone, piroxicam, rofecoxib, sodium diclof- William E. Acree enac, sodium ibuprofen, sodium naproxen, sodium J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 43, 023102 (2014) salicylate, tenoxicam, tolfenamic acid, and valdecoxib. IUPAC-NIST Solubility Data Series, Volume 102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4869683 This IUPAC-NIST Solubility Data Series volume reviews experimentally determined solubility data for 33 non- To access recent volumes in the Solubility Data Series, visit http://jpcrd.aip.org/ and steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) dissolved search IUPAC-NIST Solubility Data Series in neat organic solvents and well-defined binary and ternary organic solvent mixtures retrieved from the published chemical and pharmaceutical litera- ture covering the period from 1980 to the beginning of 2014. Except for aspirin (2-acetoxybenzoic acid) and salicylic acid (2-hydroxybenzoic acid), very little Provisional Recommendations physical and chemical property data are available Provisional Recommendations are drafts of IUPAC in the published literature for NSAIDs prior to 1980. recommendations on terminology, nomenclature, and Solubility data are compiled and critically reviewed symbols made widely available to allow interested
    [Show full text]