DOCSLIB.ORG

Chap. 7.] DEFINITION of FELONY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chap. 7.] DEFINITION of FELONY Chap. 7.] DEFINITION OF FELONY. CHAPTER VIL OF FELONIES INJURIOUS TO THE KING'S PREROGATIVE. As, according to the method I have adopted, we are next to consider such felonies as are more immediately injurious to the king's prerogrative, it will not e amiss here, at our first entrance upon this crime, to inquire briefly into the nature and meaning of felony: before we proceed upon any of the particular branches into which it is divided. Felony, in the general acceptation of our English law, comprises every species of crime, which occasioned at common law the forfeiture of lands or goods.(1) This most frequently happens in those crimes, for which a capital punishment either is or was liable to be inflicted: for those felonies which are called clergy- able, or to which the benefit of clergy extends, were anciently punished with death, in all lay, or unlearned offenders; though now by the statute-law that punishment is for the first offence universally remitted. Treason itself, says Sir Edward Coke,(a) was anciently comprised under the name felony: and in con- firmation of this we may observe that the statute of treasons, 25 Edw. III, c. 2, speaking of some dubious crimes, directs a reference to parliament; *that [*95] it may there be adjudged, "whether they be treason, or other felony." All treasons, therefore, strictly speaking, are felonies; though all felonies are not treason. And to this also we may add, that not only all offences, now capital, are in some degree or other felony; but that this is likewise the case with some other offences, which are not punished with death; as suicide, where the party is already dead; homicide by chance medley, or in self-defence; and petit larceny or pilfering: all which are (strictly speaking) felonies, as they subject the committers of them to forfeitures. So that upon the whole the only adequate definition of fel- ony seems to be that which is before laid down; viz., an offence which occasions a total forfeiture of either lands, or goods, or both, at the common law; and to which capital or other punishment may be superadded, according to the degree of guilt. To explain this matter a lfttle farther: the word felony or felonia, is of undoubted feudal origin, being frequently to be met with in the books of feuds, &c.; but the derivation of it has much puzzled the juridical lexicographers, Prateus, Calvinus and the rest: some deriving it from the Greek Voq, an impostor or deceiver; others from the Latin fallo, fefelli, to countenance which they would have it called fallonia. Sir Edward Coke, as his manner is, has given us a still stranger etymology;(b) that it is crimen animo felleo _erpe- tratum, with a bitter or gallish inclination. But all of them agree in the description, that it is such a crime as occasions a forfeiture of all the offender's lands or goods. And this gives great probability to Sir Henry Spelman's Teutonic or German derivation of it :(c) in which language indeed, as the word is clearly of feudal original, we ought rather to look for its signification, than among the Greeks and Romans. Fe-lon then, according to him, is derived from two northern words: fee, which signifies (we well know) the fief, feud, or beneficiary estate; and Ion, which signifies price or value. Felony is therefore (a) 3 Inst. 15. (b) 1 Inst. 391. (6) Glossar. tit. Felon. (1) In some of the United States by statute the term "felony" is made to embrace all offences for which a specified punishment may be imposed; e.g., imprisonment in the state penitentiary. People v. Van Steenburgh, 1 Park. C. R. 39. In the absence of such statutory definition, those offences are felonies which were so at the common law: Ward v. People, 3 Hill, 395; Dren- nan v. People, 10 Mich. 169; though in Ohio, where all offences are statutory, it has been said that "the term felony has no distinct and well defined meaning applicable to our system of criminal jurisprudence. In England it has a well-known and extensive signification, and com- prises every species of crime which, at common law, worked a forfeiture of goods and lands. But under our criminal code the word felonious, though occasionally used, expresses a signi- fication no less vague and indefinite than the word criminal." Mathews v. State, 4 Ohio, N. S. 542. VOL II.-45 353 96 DEFINITION OF FELONY. [Book IV. [*96] the same as pretium feudi, the *consideration for which a man gives up his fief; as we say in common speech, such an act is as much as your life or estate is worth. In this sense it will clearly signify the feudal forfeiture, or act by which an estate is forfeited, or escheats to the lord.(2) To confirm this we may observe, that it is, in this sense, of forfeiture to the lord, that the feudal writers constanItly use it. For all those acts, whether of a criminal nature or not, which at this day are generally forfeitures of copyhold estates,(d) are styled felonia in the feudal law: "scilicet per quas feudum amittitur."(e) As "si domino deservire noluerit;(f) si per annum et diem ces- saverit in patenda investitura;(g) si dominum ejuraverit,i. e., negaverit sea dom- ino feudum habere;(h) si a domino, in jus eumi vocante, ter citatus non compa- ruerit;"(i) all these, with many others, are still causes of forfeiture in our copyhold estates, and were denominated felonies by the feudal constitutions. So likewise injuries of a more substantial or criminal nature were denominated felonies, that is, forfeitures: as assaulting or beating the lord ;(k) vitiating his wife or daughter, "si dominum cucurbitaverit,i. e., cum uxore elus conculbue- rit;"(l) all these are esteemed felonies, and the latter is expressly so denomi- nated, "si fecerit felonium, dominum forte cucurbitando."(m) And as these contempts, or smaller offences, were felonies or acts of forfeiture, of course greater crimes, as murder and robbery, fell under the same denomination. On the other hand, the lord might be guilty of felony, or forfeit his seignory to the vassal, by the same acts as the vassal would have forfeited his feud to the lord. "Si dominus commiserit feloniam, per quam vassallus amitteret feudum si eam commiserit in dominum, feudi proprietatem etiam dominus perdere debet."(n) One instance given of this sort of felony in the lord is beating the servant of his vassal, so as that he loses his service; which seems merely in the nature of a civil *injury, so far as it respects the vassal. And all these felonies were to be determined "per laudamentum sive judicum parium suo- rum" in the lord's court; as with us forfeiture of copyhold lands are presenta- ble by the homage in the court-baron. Felony and the act of forfeiture to the lord, being thus synonymous terms in the feudal law, we may easily trace the reason why, upon the introduction of that law into England, those crimes which induced such forfeiture or escheat of lands (and, by small deflection from the original sense, such as induced the forfeiture of goods also) were denominated felonies. Thus it was said, that suicide, robbery and rape, were felonies; that is, the consequence of such crimes was forfeiture; till by long use we began to signify by the term of felony the actual crime committed, and not the penal consequence. And upon this system only can we account for the cause, why treason in ancient times was held to be a species of felony: viz. because it induced a forfeiture. Hence it follows, that capital punishment does by no means enter into the true idea and definition of felony. Felony may be without inflicting capital punish- ment, as in the cases instanced of self-murder, excusable homicide and petit lar- ceny: and it is possible that capital punishments may be inflicted, and yet the offence be no felony; as in case of heresy by the common law, which, though capital, never worked any forfeiture of lands or goods,(o) an inseparable incident to felony. And of the same nature was the punishment of standing mute, without pleading to an indictment, which at common law was capital, but without any forfeiture, and therefore such standing mute was no felony. In short, the true criterion of felony is forfeiture; for, as Sir Edward Coke justly observes(p) in all felonies which are punishable with death, the offender loses all his lands in fee-simple, and also his goods and chattels; in such as are not so punishable, his goods and chattels only. (d) See book IT, page 284. (e) Feud. 1.2, t. 16, in cale. (f ) Ibid. 1. 1, t. 21. (g) ibid. 1. 2, t. 24. (A) Ibid. 1. 2, t. 34,. 2, t. 26, J 3. (i) Ibid. 1. 2, t. 22. (k) Ibid. 1. 2. t. 24, § 2. ( ibid.1) 1. 1, t. 5. (m) Ibid. 1.2, t. 38. Britton, 1. 1, c. 22. (n) Ibid. 1. 2, t. 26 and 47. (o) 3 Inst. 43. (p) I Inst. 391. (2) [But a forfeiture of land is not a necessary consequence of felony; for petit larceny is felony, which does not produce a forfeiture of lands; but every species of felony is followed by forfeiture of goo-is and personal chattels.] 354 Chap. 7.] OFFENCES RELATING TO THE Con1r. *The idea of felony is indeed so generally connected with that of capi- tal punishment, that we find it hard to separate them; and to this usage the interpretations of the law do now conform.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Monetary Forgery in the Digital Age: Will Physical-Digital Cash Be a Solution?1
    Monetary Forgery in the Digital Age: Will Physical-Digital Cash Be a Solution?1 N ICOLAS CHRISTIN2, ALESSANDRO ACQUISTI3, BRYAN PARN04 AND ADRIAN PERRIG5 Abstract: Despite cryptographic breakthroughs in the area of digital cash and the rapid advance of information technology, physical cash remains the dominant currency: it is easy to use and its exchanges are largely independent of computing devices. However, physical cash is vulnerable to rising threats such as high quality, government-mandated forgeries. Can a hybrid of physical and digital cash protect more effectively against these threats? We discuss the rise of high-quality counterfeits and review technological solutions to thwart such threats. Specifically, we study mechanisms to combine physical cash with digital cash to remove their respective shortcomings and obtain their combined advantages. The mechanisms range from cryptographic signatures embedded in 2-D barcodes to online verification systems assisted by physical one-way functions. Notably, we compare these different proposals by looking at them through the prism of economics, and examining their cost and benefit trade-offs. 1 A preliminary, abbreviated version appeared in the Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC'oS). Cozumel, Mexico. January 2S-31, 200S. 2 Carnegie Mellon University, Information Networking Institute 3 Carnegie Mellon University, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management 4 Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering & Microsoft Research 5 Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering & Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Engineering and Public Policy 172 I/S: A JOURNAL OF LAW AND POLICY [Vol. 7:2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NATIONAL CENTER on INSTITUTIONS and ALTERNATI'ves 'I33'122nd ST., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. I' I~~~~----~~~~~--'_'_'~------~--~--~ 7i'---..I> ', SENTENCED PRISONERS UNDER 18 YEARS OF AGE I IN ADULT CORRECTIONAL FAeILITIES: I A NATIONAL SURVEY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N .. C..... A" .. tiE NAtIONAL CENTER ON INS1/'ITUTIONS AND ALYJi:iRNAl'IVr=S I 13:!J1 2~t1d ST., U.W./ WASHINCTON, Q.C. :ZOb31 I------------~........----..------------- I I H.C.I.A. THE NATIONAL CENTER ON INSTITUTIONS AND ALTERNATI'VES 'I33'122nd ST., N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. :;:0037 202/659-4'156 I I Jerome G. Miller President I Advisory Board Members Severa Austin John McKnight Human Services Planner Center/or Urban Affairs Nortbwestern Universi~y I Madison, Wirconsin Loren Beckley UOydOtlUn Cbief, Juvenile Probnt;;", Cent.r for Cnrninol Justice San Mateo County, California Hart'ar;) Law Seboo! Lou Brin Milton Rector I Department ofSociology National Council on Crime University of Massacbus~tts and Delinquency Hackensack. New Jersey AI Bronstein National Prison Project David Rothenberg Fortune Society I Washington. D.C. New York, New York Larry Brown Action Agency David Rothman Washington, D.C Center for Social Policy Columbia University JohnM.Burns I Vice President Andrew Rutherford Westingbor;.re Corporation University 0/ Birmingham New York. New York Birmingham, England Ro~rt Drinan Peter Sandmann Representative, U.S. Congress Yout/) Law Cenler I Wasbington, D.C. Sa" Francisco, California Erving Goffman Peter Schrag Department 0/ Sociolligy Journalirl University 0/ Penn~ylvania Berkeley, California I Jay Haley Joseph Sorrentino Family Tberapy Institute Author, Juvenile Court Judge Cbevy Chase, Maryland Los Angeles.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Trends in Banknote Counterfeiting
    Recent Trends in Banknote Counterfeiting Meika Ball[*] Photo: Reserve Bank of Australia Abstract Law enforcement intervention has shut down several large counterfeiting operations and led to a decline in counterfeiting rates over the past couple of years. At the same time, the increased availability of low-cost, high-quality printing technology has meant that the quality of counterfeits has improved. This article discusses trends in banknote counterfeiting in Australia and the impact of counterfeiting on different stakeholders. RESERVE BANK OF AUSTRALIA BULLETIN – MARCH 2019 1 Introduction As Australia’s banknote issuing authority, the Reserve Bank of Australia (the Bank) aims to prevent counterfeiting and maintain public confidence in the security of Australian banknotes. Counterfeiting is a crime and amounts to theft; since counterfeits are worthless, if an individual or business unknowingly accepts a counterfeit in exchange for something of value, they have been stolen from. More broadly, counterfeiting can erode public confidence in physical currency, which carries social and economic costs. Counterfeiting is prosecuted under the Crimes (Currency) Act 1981, which prescribes a number of offences. These include: • making, buying or selling counterfeit money • passing counterfeit money • possessing, importing or exporting counterfeit money • possessing, importing or exporting materials used to counterfeit money • sharing information about how to counterfeit money • wilfully damaging genuine money. Penalties for counterfeiting can be severe, including fines of up ot $75,000 and/or up to 14 years imprisonment for responsible individuals. The Bank assists in preventing counterfeiting by ensuring that Australia’s circulating banknotes are secure and of high quality, and by raising public awareness of banknote security features.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Legal Protection of Banknotes in the European Union Member States
    ECB EZB EKT BCE EKP REPORT ON THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF BANKNOTES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES November 1999 REPORT ON THE LEGAL PROTECTION OF BANKNOTES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES November 1999 © European Central Bank, 1999 Address Kaiserstrasse 29 D-60311 Frankfurt am Main Germany Postal address Postfach 16 03 19 D-60066 Frankfurt am Main Germany Telephone +49 69 1344 0 Internet http://www.ecb.int Fax +49 69 1344 6000 Telex 411 144 ecb d All rights reserved. Reproduction for educational and non-commercial purposes is permitted provided that the source is acknowledged. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Central Bank. ISBN 92-9181-051-7 2 ECB Report on the legal protection of banknotes • November 1999 Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 I. LEGAL PROTECTION OF EURO BANKNOTES 7 A. THE CRIMINAL APPROACH: COUNTERFEITING 7 1. The legal situation in the Member States 7 2. The desired legal situation 9 3. The risk of increased counterfeit activity 11 4. The possibilities of prevention – co-operation and co-ordination 12 5. The harmonisation of sanctions 18 6. The detention of counterfeit banknotes 18 B. THE CIVIL APPROACH: COPYRIGHT PROTECTION (COMPLEMENTARY TOOLS AND SETTING CRITERIA FOR LEGAL REPRODUCTIONS) 20 1. Copyright protection for euro banknotes 20 2. The use of the © sign on euro banknotes 22 3. The enforcement of copyright 23 4. The reproduction of euro banknotes 24 C. THE MATERIAL APPROACH: ANTI-COPYING DEVICES FOR REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT 26 II. LEGAL ASPECTS OF FIDUCIARY CIRCULATION 28 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Serving the Church Worldwide Serving the Church Worldwide
    Serving the Church Worldwide Medicare as Secondary Payer and Diocesan Priests 2008 Whitepaper Mark E. Chopko, Esq., Partner Nonprofit & Religious Practice Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young [email protected] James Podheiser, Esq., Partner Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young [email protected] Philip Bushnell, Area Executive Vice President Managing Director, Religious/Nonprofit Practice Group Gallagher Benefit Services, Inc. [email protected] For further information, contact: [email protected] or Toll-Free (888) 285-5106, ext. 3898 ARTHUR J. GA LL ag HER & CO. FOUNDED IN 1927 Q\BSD\NP\WhitePaper\MSP and Priests.WhitePaper.indd ABSTRACT A concern of Catholic dioceses is the provision of medical benefits may not offer incentives to Medicare – eligible employees to for those clerics, age 65 and older, still in active ministry. Under terminate enrollment in a plan or not to enroll in a plan that is the Code of Canon Law, a bishop has what has been termed by considered primary to Medicare. A series of specific regulations commentators a fiduciary obligation to care for his priests, lay out additional considerations. There is no exception to these including assurances of a pension and medical insurance. How rules for religious institutions. that obligation is discharged is not specified, and both the There are, however, some alternatives. Where persons are Commentary on the Code and US canonical Norms contemplate “employed” by entities that are not owned in common (as use of government programs to fulfill this obligation. If priests defined under the law), a group plan may seek an exception from age 65 and older are under a group health plan of an employer the Medicare rules from the government for all entities that fall (parish or diocese) that has 20 or more employees, the primary below the 20 employee threshold.
    [Show full text]
  • Benefit of Clergy
    Kentucky Law Journal Volume 15 | Issue 2 Article 1 1927 Benefit of leC rgy--A Legal Anomaly Newman F. Baker Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj Part of the Legal History Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Baker, Newman F. (1927) "Benefit of leC rgy--A Legal Anomaly," Kentucky Law Journal: Vol. 15 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol15/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Kentucky Law Journal by an authorized editor of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL Volume XV. JANUARY, 1927. Number 2. BENE FIT OF CLERGY-A LEGAL ANOMALY. I. DEVOP NT oF B NE IT OF CLERGY. Among the most prized privileges of the Medieval Church was benefit of clergy. This may be defined as an immunity by which clergymen accused of felony, could be tried only in their own courts. Not only did the ecclesiastical courts have ex- clusive jurisdiction in cases of offenses by clerks against criminal law, but also in all cases of offences by laymen against clerks. By this privilege the clergy acquired a peculiar sanctity which set them apart from the laity. The personal inviolability sur- rounding them gave them a great advantage in contests with civil authority and since the Church was held responsible only to divine law, it became almost independent of the civil power and in all differences with temporal rulers this privilege was of great value.
    [Show full text]
  • Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism
    While this translation was carried out by a professional translation agency, the text is to be regarded as an unofficial translation based on the latest official Act no. 442 of 11 May 2007. Only the Danish document has legal validity. July 2007, GlobalDenmark Translations Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism Act no. 442 of 11 May 2007 This is an Act to consolidate the Danish Act on Measures to Prevent Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, cf. Act no. 117 of 27 February 2006 with amendments consequential upon section 6 of Act no. 108 of 7 February 2007 and section 8 of Act no. 542 of 8 June 2006. Part 1 Scope etc. 1.-(1) This Act shall apply to the following undertakings and persons: 1) Banks. 2) Mortgage-credit institutions. 3) Investment companies. 4) Investment management companies. 5) Life assurance companies and lateral pension funds (nationwide occupational pension funds). 6) Savings undertakings. 7) Electronic money institutions. 8) Insurance brokers, when they act in respect of life assurance or other investment-related insurance activities. 9) Foreign undertakings' branches in Denmark, carrying out activities under nos. 1-8. 10) Investment associations and special-purpose associations, collective investment schemes, restricted associations, innovation associations and hedge associations. 11) Undertakings and persons that commercially carry out activities involving currency exchange or transfer of money and other assets. 12) Other undertakings and persons that commercially carry out one or
    [Show full text]
  • Theft, Law and Society (Book Review)
    St. John's Law Review Volume 10 Number 1 Volume 10, December 1935, Number Article 33 1 Theft, Law and Society (Book Review) Nathan Probst Jr. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/lawreview This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in St. John's Law Review by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 178 ST. JOHN'S LAW REVIEW [VOL. 10 BOOK REVIEWS THEFT, LAW AND SocIETY. By Jerome Hall. Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1935, pp. xxxv, 360. Times and statutory laws change, but man and his problems in the admin- istration of the criminal law remain the same. We have the author's report of a celebrated case at Pevensey: "A man was charged with stealing a pair of breeches, and the evidence being clear, the jury brought in a verdict of guilty. Just before he magistrate was about to pronounce sentence of death, the clerk informed the jurors that the offense was capital. The jurors were dismayed, and sought immediately to modify their verdict. One suggested that the word NOT be inserted before GUILTY; another desired the discharge of the prisoner without any formality. This being impossible, it was decided to adjourn court and consult Mr. Willard, a local coun- sellor of eminence. It happened that the chief baron and another judge were dining with Mr. Willard when the deputation recommended that the best way out was to insert after the word GUILTY, the words OF MANSLAUGHTER.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Crime and Punishment 1450 to the Present Day
    Year 10 HISTORY REVISION OPTION 1B – THE NATURE OF CRIME AND PUNISHMENT 1450 TO THE PRESENT DAY Revision Booklet THE LATER MIDDLE AGES 1100-1500 LAW AFTER THE NORMAN CONQUEST How much continuity was there? Norman law was based on the idea of the mund – this was an area of land around every man’s home in which peace and order should be allowed to exist. After 1066, because the king owned the whole country again, his mund covered everybody. William I was responsible for law and order throughout his kingdom. Law and order under the Normans was similar to that which had become established in Anglo-Saxon England. What changes did Norman law bring? Forest Laws As well as covering large areas of woodlands, the Forest Laws also included farms and villages and many of the more remote places of England. Trees could not be cut down for fuel or building. People were not allowed to own dogs or bows and arrows. Even if deer ate their crops, people could not do anything because the punishment for killing a deer was to be blinded. Royal Law and Church Law In 1154 – Henry II became king and decided to restore peace by updating and codifying the laws of England. Henry II laid the basis of what became English Common Law. In 1164 – Henry issued the Constitutions of Clarendon, which summarised the existing law and legal procedures. By the time of Henry II there were several systems of law operating in England. Anglo-Saxon law operated at the local level. Norman law as exercised by barons in their manor courts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Counterfeiting∗
    The Economics of Counterfeiting∗ Elena Quercioli† Lones Smith‡ Economics Department Economics Department Tulane University University of Michigan January 10, 2009 Abstract This paper develops a new tractable strategic theory of counterfeiting as a competition between good and bad guys. There is free entry of bad guys, who choose whether and what note to counterfeit, and what quality to produce. Good guys select a costly verification effort. Along with the quality, this effort fixes the chance of finding counterfeits, and induces a collateral “hot potato” passing game among good guys — seeking to avoid counterfeits passed around. We find a unique equilibrium of the entwined counterfeiting and verifying games. With log-concave verification costs, counterfeiters producer better quality at higher notes, but verifiers try sufficiently harder that the verification rate still rises. We prove that the unobserved counterfeiting rate is hill-shaped in the note, vanishing at extremes. We also deduce comparative statics in legal costs and the technology. We find that the very stochastic nature of counterfeiting limits its social cost. Our theory applies to fixed-value counterfeits, like checks, money orders, or money. Focusing on counterfeit money, we assemble a unique data set from the U.S. Secret Service. We identify key time series and cross-sectional patterns, and explain them: (1) the ratio of all counterfeit money (seized or passed) to passed money rises in the note, but less than proportionately; (2) the passed-circulation ratio rises in the note, and is very small at $1 notes; (3) the vast majority of counterfeit money used to be seized before circulation, but now most passes into circulation; and (4) the share of passed money found by Federal Reserve Banks generally falls in the note, as does the ratio of the internal FRB passed rate to the economy-wide average.
    [Show full text]
  • BUY 100% UNDETECTABLE COUNTERFEIT MONEY ONLINE WHATSAPP +212600451731 Others ,Laie, Hawaii, United States
    AKClassy.com BUY 100% UNDETECTABLE COUNTERFEIT MONEY ONLINE WHATSAPP +212600451731 Others ,Laie, Hawaii, United States DESCRIPTION WE SELL SUPER QUALITY UNDETECTED COUNTERFEIT MONEY, U.S DOLLARS, POUND STERLING, EURO, CANADIAN DOLLARS, AUSTRALIAN DOLLARS, AND OTHER CURRENCIES... Call/WhatsApp: +212600451731.. Our Website: https://superbanknotes.wixsite.com/fakemoney .... Email: [email protected] ... ICQ: 726799877 ...USA/Canada Call or Text: +1 (305) 787-2158 ... WeChat ID: globalcurrencies ..Telegram: @Superbills Contact us for more information: WORLD OF SUPER BANKNOTES Our Website: https://superbanknotes.wixsite.com/fakemoney Email 1: [email protected] Email 2: [email protected] Email 3: [email protected] Call/WhatsApp: +212600451731 USA/Canada Call or Text: +1 (305) 787-2158 Jabber: [email protected] Telegram: @Superbills ICQ: 726799877 Kik: fakemoneyforsale Wickr: superbanknotes Skype: hightechssdlab WeChat ID: globalcurrencies we are the best and Unique producer of Super Undetectable Counterfeit Banknotes with over a billion of our products circulating around the world. We offer only original high-quality counterfeit currency NOTES. We ship worldwide. We also print and sell Grade A banknotes of over 150 currencies in the world. I know you have been going through a lot in your life and trying it very hard to get more money. That's why we sell super notes to you so that you can benefit from these unavoidable riches. Well, you might as well fall into wrong hands who will demand lower amounts. I just want to let you know that beware of small prices. People will ask you 100, 150 to send you a ridiculous amount of counterfeit money. Don't contact me saying you have been scammed or how can you trust me.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions and Answers
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 35 | Issue 4 Article 8 1945 Questions and Answers Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Questions and Answers, 35 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 264 (1944-1945) This Correspondence is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. QUESTIONS & ANSWERS' Rollin M. Perkins and Charles L 7. Meyer (Guest Editors) Question 1: What is the difference between an accessory and an accomplice? Answer: Each word has reference to one of the guilty parties to a crime involving two or more offenders. But whereas each of such parties is an accomplice, many of them are not accessories. As already pointed out the term accessory is applied only in cases of felony, and does not apply even in a felony case to one who was actually or constructively present at the moment of its perpetration. The word accomplice, on the other hand is used whether the crime involved is treason, felony, or misdemeanor, and without reference to presence or absence at the moment of perpetration. An "accomplice" is an associate or companion in crime. Some authori- ties have used the word in a sense so broad as to include all guilty parties to the same offense. The more sound usage limits it to those whose guilt has been connected with the commission of the crime.
    [Show full text]