Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 122/Monday, June 25, 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2018 / Notices 29609 TABLE 1—FY 16 GRANTS FOR BUSES AND BUS FACILITIES COMPETITION PROJECT SELECTIONS—Continued Funded State Applicant Project ID Project description amount Project rating WA .................. Intercity Transit ...................... D2017–BUSC–116 Pattison Street Facility Ren- $1,375,000 Highly Recommended. ovation and Expansion Project. WA .................. King County Department of D2017–BUSC–117 2 Projects: (1) Eastlake Off- $1,375,000 Highly Recommended. Transportation. Street Layover Facility/ (2) King County Metro Fleet Replacement—Battery Electric Buses. WA .................. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe ...... D2017–BUSC–118 Muckleshoot Transit Bus Fa- $800,000 Highly Recommended. cility Rehabilitation. WA .................. Pierce County Public Trans- D2017–BUSC–119 CNG Bus Replacement ......... $1,375,000 Highly Recommended. portation Benefit Area Cor- poration. WA .................. Skagit Transit System ........... D2017–BUSC–120 Skagit Transit System Main- $1,375,000 Highly Recommended. tenance Operations and Administration Facility Project. WA .................. Snohomish County Transpor- D2017–BUSC–121 Double Decker Replacement $1,375,000 Highly Recommended. tation Benefit Area. Buses. WA .................. Spokane Transit Authority ..... D2017–BUSC–122 Fixed Route Coaches ............ $1,375,000 Highly Recommended. WI ................... City of Oshkosh ..................... D2017–BUSC–123 Bus Replacement .................. $1,200,000 Highly Recommended. WI ................... Wisconsin Department of D2017–BUSC–124 City of Hartford Replacement $32,000 Highly Recommended. Transportation (WisDOT). non-accessible Mini-van. WI ................... Wisconsin Department of D2017–BUSC–125 Rural Transit Technology Im- $134,880 Highly Recommended. Transportation (WisDOT). provements. WI ................... City of Appleton ..................... D2017–BUSC–126 2 Projects: (1) Bus $350,506 Highly Recommended. Replacement/ (2) Facilities Renovation Project. WI ................... City of Janesville ................... D2017–BUSC–127 Replacement Buses .............. $350,506 Highly Recommended. WI ................... City of Sheboygan ................. D2017–BUSC–128 Roof Replacement for Shore- $350,506 Highly Recommended. line Metro Administrative and Maintenance Facility. WI ................... Wisconsin Department of D2017–BUSC–129 City of West Bend—Replace- $181,600 Highly Recommended. Transportation (WisDOT). ment non-accessible mini- van and replacement ADA- accessible cutaway mini- buses. WV .................. Eastern Panhandle Transit D2017–BUSC–130/ Transit Operations and $4,491,510/ Highly Recommended. Authority. D2017–BUSC– Transfer Center. $8,490 131 .................... Total ............................... $264,446,775 [FR Doc. 2018–13558 Filed 6–22–18; 8:45 am] by federal transit law and subject to website to ensure completion of the BILLING CODE P funding availability, funds will be application process before the awarded competitively to assist in the submission deadline. Instructions for financing of capital projects to replace, applying can be found on FTA’s website DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION rehabilitate, purchase or lease buses and at http://transit.dot.gov/howtoapply and related equipment, and to rehabilitate, in the ‘‘FIND’’ module of Federal Transit Administration purchase, construct or lease bus-related GRANTS.GOV. The GRANTS.GOV funding opportunity ID is FTA–2018– Fiscal Year 2018 Competitive Funding facilities. Projects may include costs 005–TPM. Mail and fax submissions Opportunity; Grants for Buses and Bus incidental to the acquisition of buses or will not be accepted. Facilities Infrastructure Investment to the construction of facilities, such as the costs of related workforce Program FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: development and training activities, and Mark Bathrick, FTA Office of Program AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration project administration expenses. FTA (FTA), DOT. Management, 202–366–9955, or may award additional funds if they are [email protected]. ACTION: Notice of funding opportunity made available to the program prior to (NOFO). the announcement of project selections. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: The Federal Transit DATES: Complete proposals must be Table of Contents Administration (FTA) announces the submitted electronically through the A. Program Description opportunity to apply for approximately GRANTS.GOV ‘‘APPLY’’ function by B. Federal Award Information $366.3 million in fiscal year (FY) 2018 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on August 6, C. Eligibility Information funds under the Grants for Buses and 2018. Prospective applicants should D. Application and Submission Information Bus Facilities Infrastructure Investment initiate the process by promptly E. Application Review Program (CFDA #20.526). As required registering on the GRANTS.GOV F. Review and Selection Process VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:58 Jun 22, 2018 Jkt 244001 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\25JNN1.SGM 25JNN1 amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with NOTICES1 29610 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2018 / Notices G. Federal Award Administration Infrastructure Program through this i. The maximum federal share is 85 H. Technical Assistance and Other Program notice. percent of the net project cost of Information As required under 49 U.S.C. acquiring vehicles (including clean-fuel I. Federal Awarding Agency Contacts 5339(b)(5), a minimum of 10 percent of or alternative fuel vehicles) that are A. Program Description the amount awarded under the Buses compliant with the Clean Air Act (CAA) and Bus Infrastructure Program will be and/or the Americans with Disabilities Section 5339(b) of Title 49, United awarded to projects located in rural Act (ADA) of 1990. States Code, as amended by the Fixing areas. As required by 49 U.S.C. ii. The maximum federal share is 90 America’s Surface Transportation 5339(b)(8), no single grantee will be percent of the net project cost of (FAST) Act (Pub. L. 114–94, Dec. 4, awarded more than 10 percent of the acquiring, installing or constructing 2015), authorizes FTA to award funds amounts made available. vehicle-related equipment or facilities for the Grants for Buses and Bus FTA will grant pre-award authority to (including clean fuel or alternative-fuel Facilities Infrastructure Investment incur costs for selected projects vehicle-related equipment or facilities) Program (Buses and Bus Infrastructure beginning on the date that project that are required by the ADA of 1990, Program) through a competitive process, selections are announced. Funds are or that are necessary to comply with or as described in this notice, for capital only available for projects that have not maintaining compliance with the Clean projects to replace, rehabilitate, incurred costs prior to the selection of Air Act. The award recipient must purchase or lease buses and related projects and will remain available for itemize the cost of specific, discrete, equipment and to rehabilitate, purchase, obligation for three Federal fiscal years, vehicle-related equipment associated construct or lease bus-related facilities. not including the year in which the with compliance with ADA or CAA to The purpose of the Buses and Bus funds are allocated to projects. Infrastructure Program is to assist in the be eligible for the maximum 90 percent financing of buses and bus facilities C. Eligibility Information Federal share for these costs. Eligible sources of local match capital projects, including replacing, 1. Eligible Applicants rehabilitating, purchasing or leasing include the following: Cash from non- Under 49 U.S.C. 5339(b)(1), eligible buses or related equipment, and Government sources other than applicants include designated recipients rehabilitating, purchasing, constructing revenues from providing public that allocate funds to fixed route bus or leasing bus-related facilities. transportation services; revenues The Buses and Bus Infrastructure operators, states or local governmental derived from the sale of advertising and entities that operate fixed route bus Program provides funds to designated concessions; amounts received under a service, and Indian tribes. Eligible recipients that allocate funds to fixed service agreement with a State or local subrecipients include all otherwise route bus operators, and to States, and social service agency or private social eligible applicants and also private local governmental authorities that service organization; revenues generated nonprofit organizations engaged in operate fixed route bus service. FTA from value capture financing public transportation. also may award grants to eligible mechanisms; or funds from an Under 49 U.S.C. 5339(b)(3), States undistributed cash surplus; replacement recipients for projects to be undertaken may submit a statewide application on by subrecipients that are public agencies or depreciation cash fund or reserve; or behalf of public agencies or private new capital. In addition, transportation or private non-profit organizations nonprofit organizations engaged in engaged in public transportation. In development credits or documentation public transportation in rural areas or of in-kind match may substitute for accordance with 49 U.S.C. 5339(b)(2), for other areas for which a State FTA will ‘‘consider the age and local match if identified in the allocates funds. Except for projects application. condition of buses, bus fleets, related proposed by Indian
Recommended publications
  • Physical Environment $3.7 Billion

    Physical Environment $3.7 Billion

    Physical Environment $3.7 Billion GENERAL GOVERNMENT HEALTH AND 17% HUMAN SERVICES 19% CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT 21% LAW SAFETY AND JUSTICE 11% PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 32% Airport & Ferry Permitting & Facilities Environmental 2% Review Fleet Administration 1% Parks & Recreation 2% 7% Roads Solid Waste & 6% Closure 8% Water Transit Management 44% 30% Organization of the Pie Chart: The following agencies were combined to make the pie chart more readable. Roads: Roads and Roads Construction Transfers Parks & Recreation: Parks & Recreation, Youth Sports Facilities Grants, Open Space and Trails Levy Solid Waste & Closure: DNRP Admin., Solid Waste, Post‐Closure Landfill Maintenance, Historic Preservation Program Water Management: Intercounty River Improvement, Water & Land Resources, Surface Water Management Local Drainage, Wastewater Treatment, Noxious Weeds, Flood Control District Fleet Administration: Fleet Motor Pool, Fleet Management Equipment, Fleet Wastewater Equipment Repair & Replacement Airport & Ferry Facilities: Airport and Marine Services Transit: Transit and DOT Director Due to rounding, figures may not add to 100%. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM AREA INTRODUCTION The King County Physical Environment departments support services related to building and land use permitting; community and regional parks; various recreational programs; solid waste disposal; surface water management; wastewater treatment; road and bridge maintenance and improvement in the unincorporated area; and transit operations. These services are delivered by three county departments: Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP), Department of Permitting and Environmental Review (DPER), and Department of Transportation (DOT). These departments are supported by dedicated funding sources and provide services that enhance the quality of life and economic vitality of the Puget Sound region. The Department of Natural Resources and Parks (DNRP) serves as the steward of the region’s environment.
  • Arterial Transit Modes

    Arterial Transit Modes

    Metro Transit Arterial Transitway Corridors Study Technical Memorandum #2 Arterial Transit Modes 10/25/2011 Prepared by the SRF Consulting Group Team Arterial Transitway Corridors Study Technical Memorandum #2: Arterial Transit Modes Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Applicable Modes ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Local Bus .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Rapid Bus ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Modern Streetcar ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Comparison of Modes ............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Rapid Bus Peer Review ........................................................................................................................................ 8
  • Transportation Operators Committee April 26, 2017 • 10:00 A.M

    Transportation Operators Committee April 26, 2017 • 10:00 A.M

    Transportation Operators Committee April 26, 2017 • 10:00 a.m. – 11:30 a.m. PSRC Conference Room • 1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500 • Seattle, WA 98104 10:00 1. Welcome and Introductions – Trinity Parker, Chair 2. Public Comment 10:05 3. Discussion: Change in TOC Vice-Chair – Gil Cerise, PSRC 10:10 4. Report on PSRC Committee and Board Activities – Trinity Parker, Chair 10:15 5. Action: 2017 FTA Regional Competition: Project Recommendations* – Sarah Gutschow, PSRC 10:25 6. Action: FTA Funding Redistribution Request: Everett Transit* – Sarah Gutschow, PSRC 10:30 7. Discussion: Regional Centers Framework Update – Ben Bakkenta, PSRC Discuss and clarify two transit-related topics including, 1) span of transit service and 2) “planned” transit service. 10:50 8. Discussion: Transportation 2040 Plan Update Financial Strategy: Progress in Estimating Non-HCT Transit Capital Investments – Ben Brackett, PSRC 11:00 9. Discussion: 2017 Transit Integration Report Initiation – Alex Krieg, PSRC 11:10 10. Discussion: Washington State Transit Coordination Grant – Don Chartock, WSDOT 11:20 11. Discussion: DRAFT Regional Access to Remix Evaluation Report* – Gil Cerise, PSRC 12. Next Meeting: May 24, 2017: 10:00 am – 11:30 am Upcoming Meeting Topics: T2040 Plan Update; Transit Asset Management Performance Targets; T2040 Financial Plan Update; 2017 Transit Integration Report; and Transit MOU Update Discussion. 11:30 13. Adjourn *Supporting materials attached Sign language and communication material in alternate formats can be arranged given sufficient notice
  • SOUND TRANSIT MOTION NO. M99-46 Revised Policy Regarding

    SOUND TRANSIT MOTION NO. M99-46 Revised Policy Regarding

    SOUND TRANSIT MOTION NO. M99-46 Revised policy regarding advertising on Sound Transit vehicles and at transit facilities and stations BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS Meeting: Date: Type of action: Staff contact: Phone: Public & Government 7/2/99 Discussion Betty Laurs 206-398-5120 Affairs Recommendation Board of Directors 7/8/99 Discussion/Possible Action Tim Healy 206-398-5062 ACTION: Motion No. M99-46 would revise and supersede Motion No. 98-79 adopting a policy allowing advertising on Sound Transit vehicles and at transit facilities and stations to: 1. Exempt coaches leased or purchased from partner agencies that already have revenue-generating advertising on them from a six-month moratorium period allowing only Sound Transit self- promotion advertising, and 2. Allow Sound Transit the option of contracting directly with an outside vendor to sell, produce, install, maintain and remove advertising on any or all of its fleet after the six-month period of self-promotion on new vehicles. BACKGROUND: In negotiating agreements with Community Transit, King County Metro and Pierce Transit to operate Sound Transit services, it has become evident that the agency’s adopted advertising policy requires some minor modifications. 1. Exempt coaches leased or purchased from partner agencies that already have revenue-generating advertising on them from a six-month moratorium period allowing only Sound Transit self- promotion advertising The previously adopted policy stipulates that only advertising for the agency and its services be allowed for six months after service is launched to avoid distract from Sound Transit's identity. It was originally assumed that ST would only use new coaches purchased directly from manufacturers.
  • Literature Review on Transit Bus Maintenance Costs

    Literature Review on Transit Bus Maintenance Costs

    Appendix G Literature Review on Transit Bus Maintenance Cost Table of Contents Contents Page A. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 B. Typical Bus Maintenance Costs ............................................................................ 4 C. Literature Review of Available Bus Studies ........................................................... 7 1) Foothill Transit Battery Electric Bus Study - 2016 ................................................. 7 Summary of Electric Drive System Costs ................................................................. 8 2) King County Metro Articulated Diesel Hybrid Bus Study - 2006 ............................ 9 Summary of Electric Drive System Costs ............................................................... 10 3) NYCT Diesel Hybrid Bus Study - 2006 ................................................................ 11 Summary of Electric Drive System Costs ............................................................... 12 4) NYCT Diesel Hybrid Bus Study - 2008 ................................................................ 13 Summary of Electric Drive System Costs ............................................................... 14 5) AC Transit Fuel Cell Electric Bus Study - 2015 ................................................... 15 Summary of Electric Drive System Costs ............................................................... 16 6) SunLine Transit FCEB Study - 2015 ..................................................................
  • SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-76 Contract to Purchase New Flyer Articulated Hybrid Buses PROJECT NAME ST Express F

    SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-76 Contract to Purchase New Flyer Articulated Hybrid Buses PROJECT NAME ST Express F

    SOUND TRANSIT STAFF REPORT MOTION NO. M2007-76 Contract to Purchase New Flyer Articulated Hybrid Buses Meeting: Date: Type of Action: Staff Contact: Phone: Finance Committee 7/19/07 Discussion/Possible Action Ellen Gustafson, (206) 398-5094 Acting Director of Transportation Services Timothy Dunn, 206) 398-5016 ST Express Operations Manager Contract/Agreement Type: Requested Action: Competitive Procurement Execute New Contract/Agreement Sole Source Amend Existing Contract/Agreement Agreement with Other Jurisdiction(s) Budget Amendment Real Estate Property Acquisition PROJECT NAME ST Express Fleet Program PROPOSED ACTION Authorizes the chief executive officer to execute a contract with New Flyer Corporation to purchase two 60-foot New Flyer articulated hybrid buses in the amount of $1,600,000 with a 10% contingency of $160,000, for a total authorized contract amount not to exceed $1,760,000. KEY FEATURES of PROPOSED ACTION • The proposed action would authorize procurement of two 60-foot articulated hybrid buses by piggybacking on a contract King County Metro has with New Flyer. • These buses will provide the ability to implement planned service improvements. • Articulated hybrid buses provide fleet flexibility for equipment assignment in the King County Metro operated system. BUDGET IMPACT SUMMARY There is no action outside of the Board-adopted budget; there are no contingency funds required, no subarea impacts, or funding required from other parties other than what is already assumed in the financial plan. BUDGET and FINANCIAL PLAN DISCUSSION The proposed action would authorize Sound Transit to acquire two buses from the New Flyer Corporation, for a total cost of $1,760,000.
  • READINESS to EXECUTE SSGA REVIEW Seattle Department of Transportation Madison Street Bus Rapid Transit Final Report – June 23, 2020

    READINESS to EXECUTE SSGA REVIEW Seattle Department of Transportation Madison Street Bus Rapid Transit Final Report – June 23, 2020

    READINESS TO EXECUTE SSGA REVIEW Seattle Department of Transportation Madison Street Bus Rapid Transit Final Report – June 23, 2020 PMOC Contract Number: DTFT6014D00021 Task Order Number: 01 Project Number: DC-27-5304 Work Order: 29 Notice to Proceed: July 1, 2019 FTA Oversight Procedures (OPs) Referenced: 01, 20, 21, 32C, 33, 34, 40, 52 Prepared by: PMA Consultants LLC, 455 Market Street, Suite 1270 San Francisco, CA 94105 Prepared By: Bruce Stephan (917) 842-1970, [email protected] Checked By: Sarah Rios (646) 606-3202, [email protected] Length of Time Firm Assigned to Project: 0 Years 11 Months Length of Time Person Assigned to Project: 0 Years 11 Months 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. Introduction The Madison Street Bus Rapid Transit (MBRT) is a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Small Starts project sponsored by the City of Seattle’s Department of Transportation (SDOT) that will provide a vital east-west connection between Seattle’s Central District and First Hill/Capitol Hill, with connections to other high-capacity transit corridors in downtown Seattle. Design is advanced beyond 90% with a construction Notice to Proceed (NTP) forecast in April 2021 and corridor work complete in approximately a 2-year timeframe 1.2. PMOC Review The purpose of this report is to provide FTA with the Project Management Oversight Contractor’s (PMOC) professional opinion regarding the Sponsor’s readiness to execute a Small Starts Grant Agreement (SSGA). The PMOC’s report follows the guidelines of Oversight Procedure (OP) 52 Readiness to Execute a SSGA and is based on a review of the documents listed in Appendix B.
  • The Us Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry

    The Us Transit Bus Manufacturing Industry

    MTI Funded by U.S. Department of Services Transit Census California of Water 2012 Transportation and California The US Transit Bus Department of Transportation Manufacturing Industry MTI ReportMTI 12-02 December 2012 MTI Report 12-66 MINETA TRANSPORTATION INSTITUTE MTI FOUNDER LEAD UNIVERSITY OF MNTRC Hon. Norman Y. Mineta The Mineta Transportation Institute (MTI) was established by Congress in 1991 as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation MTI/MNTRC BOARD OF TRUSTEES Equity Act (ISTEA) and was reauthorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century (TEA-21). MTI then successfully competed to be named a Tier 1 Center in 2002 and 2006 in the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Founder, Honorable Norman Joseph Boardman (Ex-Officio) Diane Woodend Jones (TE 2019) Richard A. White (Ex-Officio) Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). Most recently, MTI successfully competed in the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2011 to Mineta (Ex-Officio) Chief Executive Officer Principal and Chair of Board Interim President and CEO be named a Tier 1 Transit-Focused University Transportation Center. The Institute is funded by Congress through the United States Secretary (ret.), US Department of Amtrak Lea+Elliot, Inc. American Public Transportation Transportation Association (APTA) Department of Transportation’s Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research and Technology (OST-R), University Transportation Vice Chair Anne Canby (TE 2017) Will Kempton (TE 2019) Centers Program, the California Department of
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 122/Monday, June 25, 2018/Notices

    Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 122/Monday, June 25, 2018/Notices

    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 122 / Monday, June 25, 2018 / Notices 29603 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. NCDOT at the addresses provided Resource Conservation and Recovery Clarence W. Coleman, P. E., above. This notice applies to all Federal Act (RCRA) [42 U.S.C. 6901–6992(k)]. Preconstruction and Environment agency decisions as of the issuance date 9. Executive Orders: E.O. 11990 Director, Federal Highway of this notice and all laws under which Protection of Wetlands; E.O. 11988 Administration, 310 New Bern Avenue, such actions were taken, including but Floodplain Management; E.O. 12898, Suite 410, Raleigh, North Carolina not limited to: Federal Actions to Address 27601–1418; Telephone: (919) 747– 1. General: National Environmental Environmental Justice in Minority 7014; email: [email protected]. Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321– Populations and Low Income FHWA North Carolina Division Office’s 4351]; Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 Populations; E.O. 11593 Protection and normal business hours are 8 a.m. to 5 U.S.C. 109]. Enhancement of Cultural Resources; p.m. (Eastern Time). Mr. Roger D. 2. Air: Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401– E.O. 13007 Indian Sacred Sites; E.O. Rochelle, P. E., Chief Engineer- 7671(q)]. 13287 Preserve America; E.O. 13175 Innovative Delivery, North Carolina 3. Land: Section 4(f) of the Consultation and Coordination with Turnpike Authority (NCTA), 1578 Mail Department of Transportation Act of Indian Tribal Governments; E.O. 11514 Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 1966 [49 U.S.C. 303]; Landscaping and Protection and Enhancement of 27699–1578; Telephone (919) 707–2710, Scenic Enhancement (Wildflowers) [23 Environmental Quality; E.O.
  • King County Metro Rapidride Performance Evaluation Report

    King County Metro Rapidride Performance Evaluation Report

    King County Metro RapidRide Performance Evaluation Report Prepared for Prepared by December 2014 King County Metro RapidRide Performance Evaluation Report | 2 King County Metro CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................4 Performance Evaluation ................................................................................................5 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Performance Evaluation Summary ......................................................................................................................... 6 Comparison to other National BRT Service ..................................................................20 Performance Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 21 Cost Effectiveness of Capital Expenditures .................................................................22 Methodology .......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Cost Effectiveness Performance Summary .......................................................................................................... 22 Cost Effectiveness of Operating Costs ..........................................................................32
  • Regional FTA 5307 Grant Application King County Metro Fleet Expansion: Route 120 / Rapid Ride H Line

    Regional FTA 5307 Grant Application King County Metro Fleet Expansion: Route 120 / Rapid Ride H Line Regional FTA Caucus - PSRC March 27, 2017 Scope Acquire eight of the 28 new buses necessary to implement the Rapid Ride H Line on the Route 120 corridor between Seattle and Burien. Partnership with the City of Seattle. Expect 50% ridership increase by 2025 with conversion to Photo: www.metro-magazine.com/bus/news/287284/wash-metro-transit-to-debut-brt-line Rapid Ride service levels. New vehicles are required in order to provide increased frequency that can meet forecasted demand. New low-floor vehicles make riding easier for people of all ages and abilities, and meet state-of-the-art emissions standards. 2 Need and Benefits: Route 120 Corridor Among Metro’s top 10 routes 9,200 weekday riders (2016) Weekday Transit Ridership Growth in the Route 120 Corridor Already operating over capacity Expected 118% full at peaks (2015) 13,800+ Conversion to RapidRide will: Improve frequency and span of service 9,200 Improve travel times 10-15% Maintain proper spacing (headways) 85% of the time 4,400 By 2025: expect at least 4,600 additional weekday riders with Rapid Ride conversion 2004 2016 2025 3 Project Evaluation Criteria DRAFT 4 A. Support for Centers Connects centers Regional Growth Centers: Burien, and 4 centers in Seattle CBD Local Center: Westwood Village Duwamish MIC Consistent with regional plans Metro CONNECTS, Seattle Transit Master Plan Comprehensive Plans: Seattle, Burien, King County Equity support 16 Census Tracts in the corridor are 87.5% low income, minority, or both Highly Impacted Communities: White Center; Ambaum Blvd (Burien) Jobs and housing 150+ CTR affected employers 32,000 housing units, 140k jobs 5 A.
  • System-Specific Spare Bus Ratios

    T R A N S I T C O O P E R A T I V E R E S E A R C H P R O G R A M SPONSORED BY The Federal Transit Administration TCRP Synthesis 11 System-Specific Spare Bus Ratios A Synthesis of Transit Practice Transportation Research Board National Research Council TCRP OVERSIGHT AND PROJECT TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE 1995 SELECTION COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN OFFICERS WILLIAM W. MILLAR Port Authority of Allegheny County Chair: LILLIAN C. LIBURDI, Director, Port Department, The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey Vice Chair: JAMES W. VAN LOBEN SELS, Director, California Department of Transportation MEMBERS Executive Director: ROBERT E. SKINNER, JR., Transportation Research Board, National Research SHARON D. BANKS Council AC Transit LEE BARNES MEMBERS Barwood, Inc GERALD L. BLAIR EDWARD H. ARNOLD, Chairman & President, Arnold Industries, Inc Indiana County Transit Authority SHARON D. BANKS, General Manager, Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District, Oakland, California MICHAEL BOLTON BRIAN J. L. BERRY, Lloyd Viel Berkner Regental Professor & Chair, Bruton Center for Development Capital Metro Studies, SHIRLEY A. DELIBERO University of Texas at Dallas New Jersey Transit Corporation DWIGHT M. BOWER, Director, Idaho Transportation Department ROD DIRIDON JOHN E. BREEN, The Nasser L. Al-Rashid Chair in Civil Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin Santa Clara County Transit District WILLIAM F. BUNDY, Director, Rhode Island Department of Transportation SANDRA DRAGGOO DAVID BURWELL, President, Rails-to-Trails Conservancy CATA A. RAY CHAMBERLAIN, Vice President, Freight Policy, American Trucking Associations, Inc (Past LOUIS J . GAMBACCINI Chair, 1993) SEPTA RAY W.