Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report: May 2009 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report: May 2009 Contact: Mike Taylor Tel: 020 7911 2754 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 2. DEFINING THE HOUSING MARKET AREA ................................................................. 7 3. STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE HOUSING OFFER................................ 36 4. ACTIVE MARKET........................................................................................................ 65 5. DEMOGRAPHIC TRENDS .......................................................................................... 90 6. LOCAL ECONOMIC TRENDS................................................................................... 110 7. BRINGING THE EVIDENCE TOGETHER ................................................................. 134 8. FUTURE HOUSING MARKET................................................................................... 140 9. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT............................................................................ 170 10. HOUSING REQUIREMENTS OF SPECIFIC GROUPS ............................................. 207 11. HOUSING VIABILITY ................................................................................................ 230 12. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................... 239 13. FRAMEWORK FOR MONITORING AND REVIEW................................................... 262 May 2009 Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The local authorities across West Sussex have commissioned GVA Grimley, working with GL Hearn, to prepare a Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA). This is the Final Report of the Strategic Housing Market Assessment for the Coastal West Sussex Housing Market. 1.2 The Coastal West Sussex Housing Market extends along the South Coast from Hove to Hayling Island and inland to the A283 Corridor and Midhurst. This includes the four local authority districts of Adur, Arun, Chichester and Worthing. PURPOSE OF THE SHMA 1.3 PPS3: Housing1 identifies the importance of understanding sub-regional housing markets, and taking into account market information when developing planning policies for housing provision. Strategic Housing Market Assessments (SHMAs) are intended to achieve this. They are to be a key mechanism for considering the mix of housing required, and together with Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments (SHLAAs), are intended to inform the level of future housing provision. These assessments provide an evidence base for and are intended to inform Local Development Frameworks (LDFs) and future revisions to Regional Spatial Strategies (RSSs), as well as regional and local housing strategies. 1.4 The Government published Practice Guidance on undertaking Strategic Housing Market Assessments in March 20072 (and revised in August 2007). This identifies the value of SHMAs in assisting policy development, decision-making and allocation of housing investment resources by: • Enabling regional bodies to develop long-term strategic views of housing need and demand to inform regional spatial strategies and regional housing strategies; • Enabling local authorities to think spatially about the nature and influence of housing markets in respect to their local area; • Providing robust evidence to inform policies aimed at providing the right mix of housing across the whole market area – both market and affordable housing; • Providing evidence to inform policies about the level of affordable housing required, including the need for different sizes of affordable housing. May 2009 1 Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report • Supporting local authorities to develop a strategic approach to housing through consideration of housing need and demand in all housing sectors – owner occupied, private rented and affordable – and assessment of the key drivers and relationships in the housing market; • Drawing together the bulk of evidence required for local authorities to appraise strategic housing options including social housing allocation priorities, the role of intermediate housing products, stock renewal, conversion, demolition and transfer; and • Ensuring the most appropriate and cost-effective use of public funds. 1.5 SHMAs are intended to be prepared for ‘functional’ sub-regional housing markets, which often transcend administrative boundaries. The eight local authorities (the seven Districts Councils and the County Council) have come together as a Housing Market Partnership to commission the SHMAs. 1.6 This SHMA has been prepared at a time of significant flux in housing market conditions. It both considers and addresses these short-term dynamics. The document is however intended to inform planning policies which adopt a long-term perspective and provide a framework for development for fifteen years or more. It therefore rightly focuses on understanding potential housing demand over the longer-term to provide a basis for this, accepting that there are uncertainties and risks to predicting future changes. SHMA AIMS AND OBJECTIVES 1.7 The SHMA will provide a fit for purpose basis to develop housing and planning policies by considering the characteristics of the housing market, how key factors work together and the probable scale of change in future housing need and demand. For the purposes of the independent examination into the ‘soundness’ of Local Development Plans, the Strategic Housing Market Assessment will be considered robust and credible if it provides, as a minimum, all the core outputs and meets the requirements of the process criteria set out in the Guidance. The Core Outputs are set out below. 1 CLG (November 2006) Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3): Housing 2 CLG (March 2007) Strategic Housing Market Assessments: Practice Guidance May 2009 2 Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report Figure 1.1: SHMA Core Output Requirements2 1 Estimates of current dwellings in terms of size, type, condition and tenure 2 Analysis of past and current housing market trends, including the balance between supply and demand in different housing sectors and price/ affordability. Description of key drivers underpinning the housing market 3 Estimates of total future numbers of households, broken down by age and type where possible 4 Estimates of current number of households in housing need 5 Estimates of future households that will require affordable housing 6 Estimates of future households requiring market housing 7 Estimates of the size of affordable housing required 8 Estimates of household groups who have particular housing requirements 1.8 This SHMA is being undertaken in accordance with the Practice Guidance. It includes an assessment of housing needs but incorporated into a wider process with the aim of understanding the operation of the housing market and future housing requirements across tenures. The assessment of housing needs is to be undertaken using secondary data sources, without primary survey work. The Guidance sets out that whether the assessment is based upon secondary or survey data should not be a factor in determining whether the assessment is robust and credible, as no single approach or particular dataset will result in a definitive assessment of housing need and demand. 1.9 The Government’s Practice Guidance sets out a structure and key research questions for the SHMA. These are set out below. Figure 1.2: Key Research Questions2 Stage Step Research Questions Current 1. The demographic and • What is the current demographic profile of Housing economic context the area? Market • What is the current economic profile? • How have these profiles changed over the last 10 years? 2. The housing stock • What is the current housing stock profile? • How has the stock changed over the last 10 years? 3. The active Market • What do the active market indicators tell us about current demand, particularly house prices/affordability? • How has demand changed? 4. Bringing the evidence • How are market characteristics related to together each other geographically? • What do the trends in market characteristics tell us about the key drivers in the market area? • What are the implications in terms of the balance between supply and demand access to housing? May 2009 3 Coastal West Sussex Strategic Housing Market Assessment Final Report • What are the key issues for future policy/strategy? Future 1. Indicators of future • How might the total number of households Housing demand change in the future? How are household Market types changing, e.g. is there an aging population? • How might economic factors influence total future demand? • Is affordability likely to worsen or improve? 2. Bringing the evidence • What are the key issues for future together policy/strategy? Housing Need 1. Current housing need • What is the total number of households in housing need currently (gross estimated)? 2. Future need • How many newly arising households are likely to be in housing need (gross annual estimate)? 3. Affordable housing supply • What is the level of existing affordable
Recommended publications
  • Littlehampton at War @Littlehamptonmuseum All About Littlehampton at War @Littlehampton Museum
    Littlehampton Museum learning Pack No. 2 resources learning All about Littlehampton at War @LittlehamptonMuseum All about Littlehampton at War @Littlehampton Museum This pack looks at the impact of World War Two in Littlehampton. World War Two was a world event that affected the lives of everyone. It lasted from 1939 to 1945. Life during World War Two was very difficult, many people went away to fight whilst others did their bit on the Home Front. Littlehampton became the front line as the enemy progressed across Europe. Many soldiers were stationed within the town and the beach was closed off with barbed wire. In this pack: 1. Life on the Home Front 2. Activity Suggestions 3. Object Highlights 4. Notes for photo cards 5. Photo cards 6. Oral history quote cards WWII: Life on the Home Front When Britain declared war on Germany in 1939, life would not be the same for the people of Great Britain. A lot of young men were called up to fight, whilst others volunteered. Many other men and women volunteered to help the war effort in other ways. Those that were left behind had to “keep calm and carry on”. Evacuation When War was declared it was decided that many of the major towns and cities were not safe and children were sent away for safety. This was called Evacuation. To start with many children from London were sent to Littlehampton as seaside towns were thought to be much safer than cities, which might be bombed. As the war progressed all the children were then evacuated out of Littlehampton to the countryside as Littlehampton had become a potential target for the enemy.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Adjacent to Sewage Works, Ford W/AR/2A
    Preferred Sites Site adjacent to Sewage Works, Ford W/AR/2A Site description District Arun Parish Ford Area (ha) 6.0 Potential waste Potential for the extension of the waste water treatment types works (WWTW) and potential for a commercial built waste facility, this could include waste transfer, recycling (eg. MRF) or treatment (eg. energy from waste, anaerobic digestion). Potential waste 100,000 tpa capacity Current use Previously used by Tarmac to manufacture building products. Site is partly covered by buildings and is currently vacant. Owner Tarmac - long term leaseholder. Owned by Kenbridge Ltd. Potential Grundon Waste Management Ltd (plus possibly partner) Operator Planning history and current permissions Planning policy The site is covered by Policy GEN3 (Protection of the Countryside) of the Arun District Local Plan (2003) which means that development outside the defined built-up area will only be allowed in exceptional circumstances. The site is also part of one of the potential growth areas identified in the Arun District Council ‘Options for Growth’ document (2009). Relevant planning The site has permission for industrial use. It has been history used by Tarmac to manufacture building products. Fit with the spatial strategy (see map in Appendix B) Proximity to Good proximity to waste arisings from the main urban areas waste arisings along the coast, in particular Bognor Regis and Littlehampton. Proximity to There are waste transfer sites (WTS) for construction and existing waste demolition (C&D) waste at the nearby Rudford Industrial Estate sites and Northwood Farm, Climping. Proximity to The site provides a good fit with the spatial strategy as it is advisory lorry located close to the ALR (A259).
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Variation: On-Street Parking Charges 2021 Arun District
    WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL NOTICE OF VARIATION: ON-STREET PARKING CHARGES 2021 ARUN DISTRICT NOTICE is hereby given that West Sussex County Council in exercise of its powers under Section 46A Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Regulation 25 of the Local Authorities Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 proposes to vary the Charges and Tariffs detailed in the Second Schedule of the West Sussex County Council (Arun District) (Parking Places and Traffic Regulation) (Consolidation) Order 2010. The following charges will be changed as shown from 4 January 2021: Parking Permits: Old Charge New Charge Bognor Regis CPZ 1st Resident Annual Permit £44.00 £46.00 Subsequent Resident Annual Permit £88.00 £92.00 1st Resident 6-month Permit £24.00 £25.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month permit £48.00 £50.00 Non-Resident Annual Permit £275.00 £282.00 Non-Resident 6-month permit £145.00 £149.00 Countywide permits £25.00 £26.00 Pay and Display parking charges: Old Charge New Charge Town Per 30 mins Per Hour Per 30 mins Per Hour Centre Area £0.55 £1.10 £0.60 £1.20 Marine Per 30 mins Per Hour Per 30 mins Per Hour Drive West £0.30 £0.60 £0.35 £0.70 Esplanade Per 30 mins Per Hour Per 30 Mins Per Hour £0.55 £1.10 £0.60 £1.20 Dispensation Notices: Permit Areas in Arun: Old Charge New Charge CPZ Permit Areas £10.00 per day/£60.00 £11.00 per day/£66.00 per week per week Pay and Display Areas: Old Charge New Charge Bognor Regis Town Centre £14.00 per day/£84.00 £16.00 per day/£96.00 per week per week The Esplanade £15.00 per day/90.00 per
    [Show full text]
  • Selsey NP Decision Statement July 2020
    F11f Chichester District Council Chichester District Council Local Planning Authority Selsey Neighbourhood Plan 2014 - 2029 DECISION STATEMENT 1. Introduction 1.1 Under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended), the Council has a statutory duty to assist communities in the preparation of Neighbourhood Plans and Orders and to take plans through a process of examination, referendum and adoption. The Localism Act 2011 (Part 6 Chapter 3) sets out the local planning authority’s responsibilities for Neighbourhood Planning. 1.2 This report confirms that the modifications proposed in the examiner’s report have been accepted, the draft Selsey Neighbourhood Plan has been altered as a result of it and that this plan may now proceed to referendum. 2. Background 2.1 The Selsey Neighbourhood Development Plan relates to the area that was designated by Chichester District Council as a neighbourhood area on 4 December 2012. This area is coterminous with the Selsey Town Council boundary that lies within the Chichester District Council local planning authority area. 2.2 Following the submission of the Selsey Neighbourhood Plan to the Council, the plan was publicised and representations were invited. The publicity period ended on 23 March 2018. 2.3 Mr John Slater was appointed by Chichester District Council, with the consent of Selsey Town Council, to undertake the examination of the Selsey Neighbourhood Development Plan and to prepare a report of the independent examination. 2.4 The examiner’s report concludes that, subject to making modifications recommended by the examiner, the Plan meets the basic conditions set out in the legislation and should proceed to a Neighbourhood Plan referendum.
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council V Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 1640 (09 October 2019)
    Case Name: Chichester District Council v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities And Local Government & Anor [2019] EWCA Civ 1640 (09 October 2019) Full case: Click Here Commentary: The Court of Appeal found that an Inspector had not erred in law in his application of paragraph 198 NPFF which states that where a planning application conflicts with a neighbourhood plan it should normally not be granted. The decision of the lower Court was upheld. The Appeal was made by Chichester District Council against the judgment of Upper Tribunal Judge Grubb, sitting as a Deputy Judge in the High Court, who held that a Planning Inspector had not erred in his application of paragraph 198 NPPF in permitting an appeal against the refusal by the Appellant of a planning permission for 34 homes outside of the boundary of the village of Southborne. The Inspector found that the planning application was in conflict with two policies of the Chichester Local Plan and that it would not accord with the aims of the relevant Neighbourhood Plan. However, the development proposals would not conflict with the policies of that neighbourhood plan. As the Appellant could not demonstrate a five-year housing supply the Inspector applied the presumption in favour of sustainable development in paragraph 14 NPPF and allowed the appeal. This decision was upheld by the High Court. The Court of Appeal held that the concept set out in paragraph 198 NPPF is straightforward and does not elevate the status of the neighbourhood plan within the development plan as a whole, nor does it alter the presumption that planning decisions must be made in accordance with a development plan unless material considerations indicate otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Midhurst Sense of Place
    Midhurst Sense of Place Produced as part of the Midhurst Vision by the Sense of Place Working Group September 2009 Cover image courtesy of Michael Chevis www.michaelchevis.com Contents 5 Foreword 6 Introduction 9 Context 12 Sense of Place Aims 13 Sense of Place Process 15 Activity 17 Physical Setting 20 Meaning 23 Sense of Place Definition 26 Place Making 31 Place Reading 36 Place Marketing 38 Potential Actions and Projects 39 Next Steps 40 Summary 42 Acknowledgements 43 Appendix 44 Key Design Principles 50 Terms of Reference 5 Foreword Like may towns throughout the UK, Midhurst has a range of unique qualities. Yet as a result of social and economic change it faces competition from neighbouring destinations like Chichester, Petersfield, Haselmere and Guildford. Chichester District Council recognised this problem and through a series of projects (aimed at supporting the local economy), engaged with the community to help identify key areas of development and regeneration. Whilst residents may have strong emotional links to their town or village, it is becoming increasingly important to understand and reveal the innate qualities and character of a place to attract visitors and compete with other towns in their region. However, it may be difficult to express what defines a ‘place’, but it is important to do so, to ensure that any support given by way of physical improvement or economic development, is appropriate and does not lead to the loss of individuality and regional identity. Understanding that Midhurst’s future prosperity is dependent on finding a way to manage change whilst maintaining a genuine and authentic sense of place, it became clear that a process was required to capture and articulate these unique aspects to help develop plans for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 54880 Shripney Road Bognor.Pdf
    LEC Refrigeration Site, Shripney Rd Bognor Regis, West Sussex Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment Ref: 54880.01 esxArchaeologyWessex November 2003 LEC Refrigeration Site, Shripney Road, Bognor Regis, West Sussex Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Prepared on behalf of ENVIRON UK 5 Stratford Place London W1C 1AU By Wessex Archaeology (London) Unit 701 The Chandlery 50 Westminster Bridge Road London SE1 7QY Report reference: 54880.01 November 2003 © The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2003 all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 LEC Refrigeration Site, Shripney Road, Bognor Regis, West Sussex Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 Project Background...................................................................................1 1.2 The Site........................................................................................................1 1.3 Geology........................................................................................................2 1.4 Hydrography ..............................................................................................2 1.5 Site visit.......................................................................................................2 1.6 Archaeological and Historical Background.............................................2 2 PLANNING AND LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND .....................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Variation On-Street Parking Charges 2021 Chichester District
    WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL NOTICE OF VARIATION: ON-STREET PARKING CHARGES 2021 CHICHESTER DISTRICT NOTICE is hereby given that West Sussex County Council in exercise of its powers under Section 46A Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 and Regulation 25 of the Local Authorities Traffic Order (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996 proposes to vary the Charges and Tariffs detailed in the Second Schedule of the West Sussex County Council (Chichester District) (Parking Places and Traffic Regulation) (Consolidation) Order 2010. The charges below will be changed as shown below from 4 January 2021: Parking Permits in CPZ Zones: Old Charge New Charge Chichester CPZ Centre Zone 1st Resident Annual Permit £164.00 £168.00 Subsequent Resident Annual £205.00 £210.00 Permit 1st Resident 6-month permit £87.00 £90.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month £109.00 £112.00 Permit Non-Resident Annual Permit £275.00 £282.00 Non-Resident 6-month Permit £145.00 £149.00 Chichester All Day Zone 1st Resident Annual Permit £44.00 £46.00 Subsequent Resident Annual £88.00 £92.00 Permit 1st Resident 6-month Permit £24.00 £25.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month £48.00 £50.00 Permit Non-Resident Annual Permit £275.00 £282.00 Non-Resident 6-month Permit £145.00 £149.00 Chichester Part Day Zone 1st Resident Annual Permit £38.00 £39.00 Subsequent Resident Annual £76.00 £78.00 Permit 1st Resident 6-month permit £20.00 £21.00 Subsequent Resident 6-month £40.00 £42.00 Permit Non-Resident Annual Permit £165.00 £169.00 Non-Resident 6-month Permit £87.00 £90.00 All Chichester CPZ Zones
    [Show full text]
  • Chichester District Council Planning Committee Wednesday 6 January
    Chichester District Council Planning Committee Wednesday 6 January 2021 Declarations of Interests Details of members’ personal interests arising from their membership of parish councils or West Sussex County Council or from their being Chichester District Council or West Sussex County Council appointees to outside organisations or members of outside bodies or from being employees of such organisations or bodies are set out in the attached agenda report. The interests therein are disclosed by each member in respect of planning applications or other items in the agenda which require a decision where the council or outside body concerned has been consulted in respect of that particular planning application or item. Declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests, personal interests, prejudicial interests or predetermination or bias are to be made by members of the Planning Committee or other members who are present in respect of matters on the agenda or this meeting. Personal Interests - Membership of Parish Councils The following members of the Planning Committee declare a personal interest by way of their membership of the parish councils stated below in respect of the items on the schedule of planning applications where their respective parish councils have been consulted: Mr H C Potter – Boxgrove Parish Council (BG) Rev J-H Bowden – Chichester City Council (CC) Mr R E Plowman – Chichester City Council (CC) Mrs S M Sharp – Chichester City Council (CC) Mr P J H Wilding – Lurgashall Parish Council (LG) Mr G V McAra - Midhurst Town
    [Show full text]
  • CLC Boundary Map April 2011
    CRAWLEY ELECTORAL DIVISIONS 51 Langley Green & West Green HORSHAM ELECTORAL DIVISIONS 52 Northgate & Three Bridges 24 Storrington 53 Worth & Pound Hill North 25 Bramber Castle 54 Gossops Green & Ifield East 26 Pulborough 55 Bewbush & Ifield West West Sussex County Local Committees 27 Henfield 56 Broadfield 28 Billingshurst 57 Southgate & Crawley Central 29 Southwater & Nuthurst 58 Tilgate & Furnace Green With effect from April 2011 30 Warnham & Rusper 51 59 Maidenbower & Pound Hill South 31 Horsham Tanbridge & Broadbridge Heath 32 Horsham Hurst 53 62 33 Horsham Riverside CRAWLEY East 34 Roffey NWorth o r61 t h 35 Holbrook 52 Grinstead Rusper 54 BOROUGH Ashurst M i d 63 Wood 30 57 59 North Horsham 55 Warnham 58 East Crawley 56West Crawley TurnersS Hill u s s e x CHICHESTER 35 60 ELECTORAL DIVISIONS Rudgwick Broadbridge Colgate West 1 The Witterings Heath 34 Hoathly 2 Selsey Slinfold Linchmere Plaistow & Ifold 32 3 Chichester South Loxwood Horsham Balcombe Ardingly 4 Chichester East 31 33 5 Chichester West Northchapel 6 Bourne Linch 64 North Horsham Horsted 7 Chichester North Lurgashall Itchingfield MID SUSSEX DISTRICT Lower Slaugham Keynes 8 Midhurst Southwater 9 Fernhurst Milland Fernhurst Beeding Ebernoe 29 10 Petworth Kirdford Nuthurst Central Mid Sussex Lindfield 10 Billingshurst Ansty & 28 Staplefield Cuckfield Urban Woolbeding 66 Rogate 67 Lodsworth HORSHAM DISTRICT Haywards Lindfield Heath 65 Rural North Chichester Wisborough Green Bolney 8 Stedham Easebourne Shipley Midhurst Cowfold with Tillington Petworth Chithurst Iping Trotton
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Recharge in Sussex & East Kent
    BEACH RECHARGE IN SUSSEX & EAST KENT: A PRELIMINARY INVENTORY & OVERVIEW Compiled by R. Williams, edited by C. Moses. Not to be quoted without permission 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................1 2 Inventory of beach recharge schemes ..............................................................................5 3 Notes and sources ............................................................................................................9 4 Conclusion ......................................................................................................................17 5 References......................................................................................................................21 1 Introduction Sand and shingle are being lost from many beaches in Sussex and Kent as a result of natural coastal processes as well as ill-designed sea defence and coastal protection schemes. To counteract falling beach levels, the Environment Agency and local authorities are increasingly resorting to “topping-up” the beaches with additional sand and shingle. Several terms are currently employed to refer to the artificial provision of extra beach material, but there is disagreement about their precise definition. For the purpose of this report, beach nourishment (or beach replenishment) is defined as the supply of material that has been dredged from the seabed or extracted from inland sand and gravel pits. Beach recycling is defined as the removal
    [Show full text]