DOCSLIB.ORG

REVERSE ENGINEERING for SOFTWARE and DIGITAL SYSTEMS February 2016 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REVERSE ENGINEERING for SOFTWARE and DIGITAL SYSTEMS February 2016 6 DOT/FAA/TC-15/27 Reverse Engineering for Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Software and Digital Systems Aviation Research Division Atlantic City International Airport New Jersey 08405 February 2016 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161. This document is also available from the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency. This document does not constitute FAA policy. Consult the FAA sponsoring organization listed on the Technical Documentation page as to its use. This report is available at the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center’s Full-Text Technical Reports page: actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF). Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/TC-15/27 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date REVERSE ENGINEERING FOR SOFTWARE AND DIGITAL SYSTEMS February 2016 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. George Romanski1, Mike DeWalt2 for phase 1 – research, and Dewi Daniels3for phase 2 – Validation. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) 1Verocel, Inc. 234 Littleton Road, Suite 2B, Westford MA 01886 2Certification Services, Inc., P.O. Box 1569, Eastsound, WA 98245-1569 11. Contract or Grant No. 3 Verocel Limited, 129 Devizes Road, Hilperton, Trowbridge, UK, BA14 7AZ DTFACT-09-C-00023 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW, 5th Floor Washington, DC 20024 14. Sponsoring Agency Code AIR-134 15. Supplementary Notes The Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Aviation Research Division COR was Charles Kilgore. 16. Abstract Reverse engineering (RE) is a class of development processes that starts with detailed representations of system software or hardware description for a device and applies various techniques to produce more generalized, less-detailed representations. The goal is to have more abstract representations that can be used to understand and consider the structure and intent of the more detailed representations. RE has been used in many industries, including aircraft applications for mechanical, hardware and software components. The scope of this report covers RE software and electronic hardware device applications for airborne systems and equipment. The Federal Aviation Administration sponsored this research project to provide a clear understanding of what should be considered RE for airborne software and airborne electronic hardware (AEH) devices and under what conditions it could be deployed or restricted in the aircraft certification environment. This report provides an overview of the aviation industry’s views of RE, the potential issues of employing RE for safety-critical airborne systems, recommendations for when RE application is acceptable, and some associated criteria for successful implementation. The RE development process is the opposite of the traditional waterfall model that has been a well-known commodity to the certification authorities; therefore, RE, which is much less known, poses a concern to the certification authorities. Without a common set of recognized and accepted terminology, definitions, and constraints on the processes and other issues, the certification authorities are forced to provide case-by-case evaluations of the different RE proposals. This report provides the research results for RE. The intended audience includes practitioners who develop compliance evidence, as well as evaluators for airborne software and AEH to be approved under RTCA documents DO-178B and DO-254, respectively. The report proposes a framework for RE of software and electronic hardware for airborne systems and equipment. This report also validates that framework by presenting two case studies. The software case study chosen is a subset of an Ada runtime library. This library was chosen because it is distributed under the GNU General Public License and because it has previously been approved to DO-178B Level A as part of a specific aircraft project. The AEH case study was based on the certification of a system with two programmable logic devices. The intent of these case studies was to validate the framework against two examples that were developed using RE and approved by the FAA. 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement This document is available to the U.S. public through the Reverse engineering, Software, DO-178, CAST-18, DO-254, National Technical Information Service (NTIS), Springfield, Complex electronic devices Virginia 22161. This document is also available from the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov. 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of Pages 22. Price Unclassified Unclassified 120 Form DOT F 1700.7 (8-72) Reproduction of completed page authorized ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank Kelly Hayhurst from the NASA Langley Research Center for her valuable contribution to the survey. We also thank the Federal Aviation Administration Review Team, consisting of Barbara Lingberg, Charles Kilgore, Richard Spencer, Srini Mandalapu, and Will Struck, for their technical support and guidance throughout the project. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY viii 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose and Scope 2 1.2.1 Why is This Report Needed? 2 1.2.2 Intent of the Report 3 1.3 Section Overviews 4 2. SURVEY AND INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE 5 2.1 Industry experience 5 2.2 Industry perspective from survey 5 2.2.1 Software Survey Results 5 2.2.2 CEH Survey Results 6 2.3 Terminology 7 2.3.1 Reverse Engineering 7 2.3.2 Configuration Management of Reverse Engineered Artifacts 8 2.3.3 Certifier 8 2.3.4 Forward Engineering 8 3. FRAMEWORK FOR PERFORMING RE 9 3.1 Software Development Processes and Sequence Dependencies 9 3.2 Compatibility of Regulatory Guidance With RE Processes 9 3.3 Roles 12 3.4 Processes 13 3.4.1 An Example of Source Code to LLR Development 13 3.4.2 Generic RE Processes 15 3.4.3 Inputs 15 3.4.4 Outputs 16 3.4.5 Entry Criteria 17 3.4.6 Exit Criteria 17 3.4.7 Process Description 18 3.5 The RE Aspects of Software Verification 18 3.6 Generic RE SME Verification Process 20 iv 3.6.1 Inputs 20 3.6.2 Outputs 21 3.6.3 Entry Criteria 21 3.6.4 Exit Criteria 22 3.6.5 Process Description 22 3.7 Acceptance Criteria 22 4. VALIDATION OF FRAMEWORK 23 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 23 6. CONCLUSIONS 25 7. REFERENCES 25 APPENDICES A—CASE STUDY: ANALYSIS OF PROJECTS COMPLETED AT VEROCEL B—REVERSE ENGINEERING SURVEY C—REVERSE ENGINEERING SURVEY RESULTS D—ANALYSIS OF ISSUES AND THEIR POTENTIAL MITIGATIONS E—VALIDATION OF FRAMEWORK FOR SOFTWARE F—VALIDATION OF FRAMEWORK FOR AIRBORNE ELECTRONIC HARDWARE v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1 Example processes for development and review of LLRs using RE 14 2 Generic processes for development and review of different abstraction layers 15 vi LIST OF ACRONYMS A/D Analog/digital AEH Airborne electronic hardware (includes complex electronic hardware and simple electronic hardware) ARTE Ada Runtime Environment CAST Certification Authorities Software Team CEH Complex electronic hardware COTS Commercial off-the-shelf DER Designated engineering representative DOD Department of Defense DVD-ROM Digital Versatile Disc – Read-Only Memory ELOC Effective lines of code FAA Federal Aviation Administration GNAT GNU New York University Ada 9X Translator GNU A recursive acronym for “GNU’s Not Unix!”—Unix-like computer operation system developed by the GNU Project GPL General Public License HAS Hardware accomplishment summary HIS High integrity software HLR High-level requirement ICU Interface Control Unit KLOC Kilo (thousand) lines of code LAL Less abstract layer LLR Low-level requirement MAL More abstract layer NaN Not a number PHAC Plan for Hardware Aspects of Certification PLD Programmable logic device PR Problem report PSAC Plan for Software Aspects of Certification RE Reverse engineering RESP Reverse Engineering Software Plan SAS Software Accomplishment Summary SDP Software Development Plan SME Subject matter expert SOI Stage of involvement SUNECO Training aid identifying the combination of SUfficient, NEcessary, and COrrect TSO Technical Standard Order UAS Unmanned aircraft system VHDL Very High Speed Integrated Circuit (VHSIC) Hardware Description Language vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Reverse Engineering (RE) is a class of development processes that start with detailed representations of software for a system, or a hardware description for a device, and apply various techniques to produce more generalized, less detailed representations. The goal is to have more abstract representations that can be used to understand and consider the structure and intent of the more detailed representations. RE has been used in many industries, including aircraft applications for mechanical, hardware, and software components. The scope of this report is the electronic hardware devices and software applications of RE for airborne systems and equipment. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) sponsored this research task to provide a clear understanding of what should be considered acceptable RE for airborne software and airborne electronic hardware (AEH) devices, and under what conditions it could be deployed or restricted in the aircraft certification environment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reverse Engineering Digital Forensics Rodrigo Lopes October 22, 2006
    Reverse Engineering Digital Forensics Rodrigo Lopes October 22, 2006 Introduction Engineering is many times described as making practical application of the knowledge of pure sciences in the solution of a problem or the application of scientific and mathematical principles to develop economical solutions to technical problems, creating products, facilities, and structures that are useful to people. What if the opposite occurs? There is some product that may be a solution to some problem but the inner workings of the solution or even the problem it addresses may be unknown. Reverse engineering is the process of analyzing and understanding a product which functioning and purpose are unknown. In Computer Science in particular, reverse engineering may be defined as the process of analyzing a system's code, documentation, and behavior to identify its current components and their dependencies to extract and create system abstractions and design information. The subject system is not altered; however, additional knowledge about the system is produced. The definition of Reverse Engineering is not peaceful though, especially when it concerns to court and lawsuits. The Reverse Engineering of products protected by copyrighting may be a crime, even if no code is copied. From the software companies’ point of view, Reverse Engineering is many times defined as “Analyzing a product or other output of a process in order to determine how to duplicate the know-how which has been used to create a product or process”. Scope and Goals In the Digital Forensics’ scope, reverse engineering can directly be applied to analyzing unknown and suspicious code in the system, to understand both its goal and inner functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • 245533753-MIT.Pdf
    THE VULNERABILITY OF TECHNICAL SECRETS TO REVERSE ENGINEERING: IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPANY POLICY By Cenkhan Kodak M.S. in Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering (2001) University of Massachusetts at Amherst Submitted to the Systems Design and Management Program In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management At the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2008 © 2008 Cenkhan Kodak. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and Distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created Signature of the Author: m- /7 Systems Desigq and Management Program r\ Ja iry 2008 Certified by: 7 Professoi ,ric von Hippel Thesis Supervisor, MIT mSchgQl o•.Ma genfer t Certified by: MASSACHUSES INSTITUTE= Pat Hale OF TEOHiNOLOGY Director, Systems Design and Management Program MAY 0 6 2008 I-I .a,:IARCHIVES -2- THE VULNERABILITY OF TECHNICAL SECRETS TO REVERSE ENGINEERING: IMPLICATIONS FOR COMPANY POLICY By Cenkhan Kodak Submitted to the Systems Design and Engineering Program On February 04 2008, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management Abstract In this thesis I will explore the controversial topic of reverse engineering, illustrating with case examples drawn from the data storage industry. I will explore intellectual property rights issues including, users' fair-use provisions that permit reverse engineering. I will also explore the nature of the practice via several types of analyses including: the costs and benefits of reverse engineering; the practical limitations of reverse engineering; and a layered approach to reverse engineering as it applies to complex systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Software Security and Reverse Engineering
    Software Security and Reverse Engineering What is reverse engineering? Today the market of software is covered by an incredible number of protected applications, which don't allow you to use all features of programs if you aren't a registered user of these. Reverse engineering is simply the art of removing protection from programs also known as “cracking”. In Some other words cracking is described as follows: - “When you create a program you engineer it, in fact you build the executable from the source-code. The reverse engineering is simply the art of generate a source-code from an executable. Reverse engineering is used to understand how a program does an action, to bypass protection etc. Usually it's not necessary to disassemble all code of the application not only the part of the application that we are interested must be reversed. Reverse engineering used by a cracker to understand the protection scheme and to break it, so it's a very important thing in the whole world of the crack.” In short: - "Reverse Engineering referred to a way to modify a program such that it behaves as the way a reverse engineer wish." “Cracking is a method of making a software program function other than it was Originally intended by means of investigating the code, and, if necessary, patching It.” A Little bit of history Reveres egg. Most probably start with the DOS based computer games. The aim is that a player has full life and armed in the final stage of the game. So what a reverse egg.
    [Show full text]
  • Soft Robotic Hand Prosthesis Using Reverse Engineering and Fast Prototyping
    Proceedings of the 1 st Iberic Conference on Theoretical and Experimental Mechanics and Materials / 11 th National Congress on Experimental Mechanics. Porto/Portugal 4-7 November 2018. Ed. J.F. Silva Gomes. INEGI/FEUP (2018); ISBN: 978-989-20-8771-9; pp. 953-966. PAPER REF: 7452 SOFT ROBOTIC HAND PROSTHESIS USING REVERSE ENGINEERING AND FAST PROTOTYPING Hugo D’Almeida, Tiago Charters, Paulo Almeida, Mário J.G.C. Mendes (*) Instituto Superior de Engenharia de Lisboa (ISEL), Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal (*) Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The present work aimed to develop a soft robotic prosthesis of the human hand using reverse engineering and fast prototyping. This project arises in response to some limitations of the current conventional prostheses, namely aesthetic, mechanical and cost, that fail to fulfil the needs of its users, for example with soft objects. The hand prosthesis design involved the acquisition and processing of a medical image of the user's hand, followed by a modelling process which proved to be highly complex, and finally the obtainment of a real model (by 3D printing) of the prosthesis. The results obtained proved to be satisfactory in the approximation of the hand morphology, low cost and the designed mechanical properties. However, due to some technological limitations (the used 3D printers), and more specifically in the physical conception of the model, its functionality is yet to be proved with the pneumatic control. Keywords: Soft robotics, reverse engineering, fast prototyping, hand prosthesis. INTRODUCTION The human hand can be considered the most used tool by the man in the execution of the daily tasks, and its loss leads to physical and psychological damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Engineering Is Reverse Forward Engineering)
    RE- ENGINEERING The reengineering of software was described by Chikofsky and Cross in their 1990 paper, as "The examination and alteration of a system to reconstitute it in a new form" . Less formally, reengineering is the modification of a software system that takes place after it has been reverse engineered, generally to add new functionality, or to correct errors. This entire process is often erroneously referred to as reverse engineering; however, it is more accurate to say that reverse engineering is the initial examination of the system, and reengineering is the subsequent modification. Re-engineering is mostly used in the context where a legacy system is involved. Software systems are evolving on high rate because there more research to make the better so therefore software system in most cases, legacy software needs to operate on a new computing platform. 'Re-engineering' is a set of activities that are carried out to re-structure a legacy system to a new system with better functionalities and conform to the hardware and software quality constraint. FORWARD ENGINEERING Forward engineering is the opposite of reverse engineering. In forward engineering, one takes a set of primitives of interest, builds them into a working system, and then observes what the system can and cannot do. Forward engineering is the foundation of synthetic psychology (Braitenberg, 1984; Dawson, 2004; Pfeifer & Scheier, 1999). Braitenberg has argued that forward engineering is likely to produce simpler theories than reverse engineering because the latter tends to attribute behavioural complexities to the internal mechanisms of the agent. Braitenberg calls this the law of uphill analysis and downhill synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Engineering a Legacy Software in a Complex System: a Systems Engineering Approach
    Reverse engineering a legacy software in a complex system: A systems engineering approach Maximiliano Moraga Yang-Yang Zhao University College of Southeast Norway University College of Southeast Norway Kongsberg, Norway Kongsberg, Norway +47 94195982 +47 31009699 [email protected] [email protected] Copyright © 2018 by Maximiliano Moraga and Yang-Yang Zhao. Published and used by INCOSE with permission. Abstract. In a complex system, a legacy software as a component is determined by various factors beyond its own capability. Lack of knowledge that shaped software, which is often the case of a legacy software, can prohibit appropriate maintenance and development to comply with the system needs. To reverse engineering legacy software for a fit with the overall system of interest is a daunting task. Existing techniques of reverse engineering are mostly from a purely technical point of view and for the single discipline of software engineering. Thus, this paper aims for an approach to properly reverse engineer the reasoning behind the legacy software developments in a complex system. By jointly apply the CAFCR model and the reverse engineering, a roadmap is created to guide incremental developments of legacy software in a complex system, which benefits both the maintenance of existing implementation and realization of new functionalities for improved system performance. Introduction Software development has the growing importance for many business successes. One critical issue for an existing business is the maintenance and continuous development of its software. With increasing competition, existing businesses have a tremendous pressure on the fast pace upgrading which left no time for the software to be re-created and re-implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Efficient Instrumentation for Reverse-Engineering Object Oriented Software Through Static and Dynamic Analyses
    Towards Efficient Instrumentation for Reverse-Engineering Object Oriented Software through Static and Dynamic Analyses by Hossein Mehrfard A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Ottawa-Carleton Institute for Electrical and Computer Engineering Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2017 Hossein Mehrfard Abstract In software engineering, program analysis is usually classified according to static analysis (by analyzing source code) and dynamic analysis (by observing program executions). While static analysis provides inaccurate and imprecise results due to programming language's features (e.g., late binding), dynamic analysis produces more accurate and precise results at runtime at the expense of longer executions to collect traces. One prime mechanism to observe executions in dynamic analysis is to instrument either the code or the binary/byte code. Instrumentation overhead potentially poses a serious threat to the accuracy of the dynamic analysis, especially for time dependent software systems (e.g., real-time software), since it can cause those software systems to go out of synchronization. For instance, in a typical real-time software, the dynamic analysis result is correct if the instrumentation overhead, which is due to gathering dynamic information, does not add to the response time of real-time behaviour to the extent that deadlines may be missed. If a deadline is missed, the dynamic analysis result and the system’s output are not accurate. There are two ways to increase accuracy of a dynamic analysis: devising more efficient instrumentation and using a hybrid (static plus dynamic) analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Engineering to Teach Scientific Concepts: Biomimetic Robot Systems Vivek Kumar1* 1Team Genius Mentor, CT, USA
    Reverse Engineering to Teach Scientific Concepts: Biomimetic Robot Systems Vivek Kumar1* 1Team Genius Mentor, CT, USA Abstract: This mentor presentation displays how Team Genius mentors teach concepts through the process of reverse engineering. It examines the current applications of re- verse engineering to teach both a scientific concept, in this case, biomimetics, and engi- neering concepts. To begin, we will describe existing robots and prototypes—from re- search labs of Stanford University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology—with visual aids/models. Later, we will take apart (reverse engineer) working biomimetic LEGO robot prototypes. This structural and functional analysis will convey the biomi- metic concepts integrated within the robots. In the process of examining and reverse engi- neering biomimetic robots, the presentation will convey bioenvironmental concepts with practical application, as well as mechanical engineering strategies. This learning process is akin to one that can be used in a typical biological, environmental science, or engineer- ing classroom. Key Words: Robots, Biomimetics, RoboCupJunior, Environment, iRobot, ERI, Biology, Environmental Science, Education, Classroom, Reverse Engineering 1. Introduction: The educational community is of vital importance. This mentor presentation’s purpose is to explore and display new, innovative ways of presenting STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math) knowledge in a classroom en- vironment, via robotics. a. Team Genius was founded by Vivek Kumar, now a mentor, in 2010, as a private robotics team. Since its inception, it has won numerous awards, such as FIRST Robotics state championships, the FIRST Programming Awards, and the IEEE Engineering design awards. Team members now look to expand their love of science, innovation, and engineering to the in- ternational community.
    [Show full text]
  • Reverse Engineering in Product Manufacturing: an Overview
    DAAAM INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC BOOK 2013 pp. 665-678 CHAPTER 39 REVERSE ENGINEERING IN PRODUCT MANUFACTURING: AN OVERVIEW KUMAR A.; JAIN, P. K. & PATHAK, P. M. Abstract: Reverse engineering plays vital role in the branch of the mechanical design and manufacturing based industry. This technique has been widely recognized as an important technique in the product design cycle. In regular computerized manufacturing environment, the operation order usually starts from the product design and ends with machine operation to convert raw material into final product. It is often essential to reproduce a CAD model of existing part using any digitization techniques, when original drawings or documentation are not available and used for analysis and modifications are required to construct a improved product design. In reverse engineering approach the important steps involved, are characterizations of geometric models and related surface representations, segmentation and surface fitting of simple and free-form shapes, and creating accurate CAD models. The chapter presents review on reverse engineering methodology and its application areas related to product design development. The product re-design and research with reverse engineering will largely reduced the production period and costs in product manufacturing industries. Key words: reverse engineering, scanning techniques, point cloud/STL data, CAD/CAM/CAE Authors´ data: Kumar A[tul], Jain, P[ramod] K[umar]; Pathak, P[ushparaj] M[ani], Mechanical & Industrial Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, 247667, Uttarakhand India, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] This Publication has to be referred as: Kumar, A[tul]; Jain, P[ramod] K[umar] & Pathak, P[ushparaj] M[ani] (2013) Reverse Engineering in Product Manufacturing: An Overview , Chapter 39 in DAAAM International Scientific Book 2013, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Revenge: a System for Analyzing Reverse Engineering Behavior
    Getting RevEngE: A System for Analyzing Reverse Engineering Behavior Claire Taylor Christian Collberg Department of Computer Science University of Arizona Tucson, AZ 85721 [email protected], [email protected] Abstract Code obfuscation is a popular technique used by white- ⓵ ⓶ ⓷ Generate 1 Script2 Challenge Script Generate Obfuscate Compile as well as black-hat developers to protect their software Asset Random p0.c p1.c p2.exe Program Program Program from Man-At-The-End attacks. A perennial problem has Seed1 Seed2 been how to evaluate the power of different obfuscation Solve Challenge ⓸ Analyze Results techniques. However, this evaluation is essential in order Reward ($) ⓹ Correctness Virtual Machine p3.c to be able to recommend which combination of techniques & Precision Reverse User p2.exe Engineering to employ for a particular application, and to estimate how Monitor Tools User ⓺ Analysis & long protected assets will survive in the field. We describe a Actions Visualization system, RevEngE, that generates random obfuscated chal- lenges, asks reverse engineers to solve these challenges Figure 1: System Overview. (with promises of monetary rewards if successful), monitors and collects data on how the challenges were solved, and verifies the correctness of submitted solutions. Finally, the technique. system analyzes the actions of the engineers to determine Attacks on obfuscation (known as reverse engineering the sequence and duration of techniques employed, with the or deobfuscation) aim to defeat the obfuscating transforma- ultimate goal of learning the relative strengths of different tions by extracting a close facsimile of the asset a from P 0. combinations of obfuscations. Much work has gone into developing methods to evalu- ate obfuscating transformations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metallurgical Engineering
    METALLURGICAL Innovation. Integrity. ENGINEERING Dependability. Dayton T. Brown, Inc.’s metallurgical lab is your resource for failure and engineering investigations, and metallurgical testing and analysis. Our comprehensive range of metallurgical services include: • Failure analysis ranging from aircraft structural components to electronics packaging • Detailed conformance-to-blueprint inspections • Fatigue and corrosion testing • Corrosion analysis and control • Wear/abrasion evaluations • Coating replacement evaluations • Weld evaluations • Reverse engineering programs • Development of advanced non-destructive testing techniques www.dtb.com ISO 9001:2015 and AS9100D Testing ACCREDITED Registered *Lab Code 200422-0 Accredited Test Lab *767.01, 767.02, 767.03 1195 Church Street, Bohemia, NY 11716-5014 USA Please direct all inquiries to: 1-800-232-6300 • email [email protected] A World of Engineering and Testing Visit our web site at: www.dtb.com TM Under One Roof * Please visit www.dtb.com for testing covered under our scopes of accreditation. DTB’s staff includes experienced metallurgists/materials engineers (M.S./Ph.D.) and technicians (Level 2/Level 3 in various NDI techniques). Our metallurgical lab is fully equipped with: • Scanning electron microscope with • Hardness measurement machines energy dispersive spectroscopy • Inverted optical metallograph • Arc emission spectroscope • High resolution digital imaging equipment • Metallographic sample preparation equipment • Advanced image analysis software • Stereomicroscopes • Comprehensive reference library and • Borescopes specifications database • Various non-destructive flaw detection testing techniques and equipment Failure Analysis The metallurgical lab has immediate access to in-house expertise in a wide range of technical specialties, including EMI/EMC, Shock and Vibration, Environmental Testing, Life Support Systems, Stress Analysis, Engineering Design, and Manufacturing Engineering.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Inspection & Attack: New Frontier in Hardware Security
    Physical Inspection & Attack: New Frontier in Hardware Security M Tanjidur Rahman1, Qihang Shi, Shahin Tajik, Haoting Shen, Damon L. Woodard, Mark Tehranipoor and Navid Asadizanjani Abstract— Due to globalization, the semiconductor industry chip polishing, microscopy, probing, focus ion Beam is becoming more susceptible to trust and security issues. (FIB), X-ray imaging, laser voltage probing etc. have Hardware Trojans, i.e., malicious modification to integrated experienced significant advancement to facilitate these circuits (ICs), can violate the root of trust when the devices are fabricated in untrusted facilities. Literature shows as the techniques. Demand for higher yield and faster failure microscopy and failure analysis tools excel in the resolution and analysis and fault localization at smaller technology nodes capability, physical inspection methods like reverse engineering also catalyzed the progress and revolution in FA techniques and photonic emission become attractive in helping verify and tools. However, an adversary can use such FA such trust issues. On the contrary, such physical inspection methods and tools to attack a chip and compromise methods are opening new capabilities for an adversary to extract sensitive information like secret keys, memory content security through exposing assets – sensitive information, or intellectual property (IP) from the chip compromising intellectual property, firmware, cryptographic keys etc. [5]. confidentiality and integrity. Different countermeasures have Researchers showed that such physical inspection methods, been proposed, however, there are still many unanswered when used for physical attacking of a chip, are capable questions. In this paper, we discuss physical inspection/attack of compromising the confidentiality and integrity provided methods using failure analysis tools and analyze the existing countermeasures and security/trust issues related to them.
    [Show full text]