DOCSLIB.ORG

Geometric Knot Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Geometric Knot Theory Geometric Knot Theory HUI, Wing San A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Philosophy in Mathematics ©The Chinese University of Hong Kong November 2003 The Chinese University of Hong Kong holds the copyright of this thesis. Any person(s) intending to use a part or whole of the materials in the thesis in a proposed publication must seek copyright release from the Dean of the Graduate School. 统系i書圓^^ Geometric Knot Theory i Abstract The space of n-sided (n > 3) polygonal knots embedded in consists of a smooth manifold in which points correspond to piecewise linear knots (Geometric knots), while paths correspond to isotopies which preserve the geometric structure of these knots. We will discuss the latest development in the study of geometric isotopies versus the topological ones. In particular, for n = 6, the knot space consists of five components, but contains only three topological knot types. These show that the geometric knot equivalence is strictly stronger than topological equivalence. This point is demonstrated by the example of trefoil. In addition, some of the topological features of the lower dimensional knot spaces (3 < n < 6) are described. We will also introduce two other topics, the minimal stick number and the superbridge index. 摘要 嵌入在三維歐氏空間R3的n-邊形紐結空間是一個光滑流形，每一 個點對應於一個分段線性紐結(Geometric knots),而每一條道路則對應 於一個保持紐結的幾何結構的同倫。在這篇論文中，我們會討論幾何 同倫對比於拓撲同倫的一些最新發展。特別當n = 6時，紐結空間有五 個道路連通部份，但是只有三種拓撲紐結類。從此可以看到幾何等價 比拓撲等價嚴格地強。而這一點可以從trefoil的例子看到。另外，我 們也會描述低維紐結空間(3 S n S 6)的一些拓撲特質。我們還會介紹兩 個主題，分SU是 minimal stick number 禾口 superbridge index� Geometric Knot Theory ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am greatly indebted to my supervisor, Prof. Thomas K. Au, for his continual guidance and constant encouragement and help throughout the period of my postgraduate studies. Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Outline of Thesis 2 2 Basic Knowledge of Knot Theory 3 2.1 Preparation 3 2.1.1 Knots, Knot Equivalence and Isotopic Knot . 3 2.1.2 Tame and Wild Knots 5 2.2 Some Invariants and Quantities about Knot 7 2.2.1 Projection of Knot and Crossing Number ... 7 2.2.2 Braids and Braid Index 7 3 Minimal Stick Number 11 3.1 History and Definition 11 3.2 Minimal Stick Number on Some Simple Knots .... 12 3.3 Some Theorems on the Minimal Stick Number .... 14 4 Superbridge Index 22 iii 4.1 Definitions of Bridge Index, Superbridge Index and Total Curvature 22 4.2 Superbridge Index and Braid Index 25 4.3 Relations between Bridge Index, Superbridge Index and Total Curvature 29 4.4 Superbridge Index and Minimal Stick Number .... 36 5 The Geometric Knot Space 37 5.1 Definition of the Geometric Knot Space 37 5.2 Geometric Equivalence and Topological Properties of the Geometric Knot Space, Geo{n) 39 5.3 The Spaces Geo(3), Geo(4) and Geo(5) 40 5.4 Topology of the Space Geo(6) 43 6 Concluding Remarks 52 6.1 Other Results on the Minimal Stick Number 52 6.2 Minimal Stick Number and Superbridge Index of the Torus Knot 54 6.3 Explorations of the Geometric Knot Spaces 56 Bibliography 58 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Introduction For a knot, we always imagine a string with two ends which has some self-crossing. But in the mathematical viewpoint, or more precisely the topological viewpoint, any two strings with two ends are the same since we can always move one of the two ends to remove all the crossings. So, in mathematics, a knot is formed by joining the two ends to the string to form a closed loop. More formally, in mathematical terms, a knot is a embedded circle in E^ or, sometimes, in the one point compactification of E^, which is the 3-dimensional sphere, S^. And for any two knots, if we can deform them from one to another, we say that the two knots are the same. The formal definition will be given in chapter 2. Actually, the study of knots was first motivated by chemistry. In 1880s', knot was one of the imagined model of atoms, which attracted some people to tabu- lating knots to create the table of atoms. Now, we know this model is incorrect, but knot has entered another field of chemistry. In 1980s', about hundred years later, people discovered that the DNA molecules are knotted. Also, people found that the properties of knotted molecule depend on the knot type. More details about this story can be found in Adams's book [1]. 1 Geometric Knot Theory 2 1.2 Outline of Thesis In this thesis, we will discuss some new developments in knot theory and three topics are included. The thesis is organized as followings. In chapter 2, we begin our study from the classical knot theory as a prerequisite, which includes the definition of knots and knot equivalence. Then, we will introduce the crossing number and braid index which will appear in the contents. In chapter 3, we discuss our first topic, the minimal stick number, which is about the study of knotted polygons. In our discussion, we will give the definition and will discuss some methods of calculating the minimal stick number. Also, some examples are given. In chapter 4，we study the second topic, the superbridge index, which is motivated by the study of bridge index in classical knot theory. We will define the superbridge and give some relations of the superbridge index to the others, such as the bridge index, the total curvature and the braid index. In chapter 5, we have the geometric knot spaces which are the spaces of polygonal knots. We will define the geometric knot spaces for edge numbers n with n > 3 and study some topological properties of the spaces. Then, we will discuss the cases for n = 3,4,5,6. In chapter 6，we will discuss some results that are related to our topics and some areas for further research. Chapter 2 Basic Knowledge of Knot Theory In this chapter, we will first discuss some basic knowledge of knot theory. Then we define some knot invariants including both the classical one and the recent one. 2.1 Preparation 2.1.1 Knots, Knot Equivalence and Isotopic Knot In this section, we are going to discuss what a knot is, and give the definition of equivalent knots. First, we define our main object, knots. Definition 2.1.1. {Definition of Knot) A knot is a subset, K, of R^ such that there exists an embedding of the unit circle, S^, into R^ whose image is K. That is, there exists M^, such that f{S') = K. In the view of topology, spaces are considered to be the same if they are home- omorphic. But from the above definition, homeomorphisms cannot distinguish 3 Geometric Knot Theory 4 any knots, since knots are always homeomorphic to S^. So we need to find an appropriate definition for knot equivalence. Definition 2.1.2. {Knot Equivalence) Two knots in Ki and K2 are said to be equivalent if there exists a homeo- morphism, h, of onto itself such that h{Ki) = K2, Clearly, knot equivalence is really an equivalence relation. Under this equiv- alence relation, we have the following definition. Definition 2.1.3. (Knot Type) The equivalence class of a knot K is said to be the knot type of K and denoted by [K]. That is, for any K' e [K], K' and K are equivalent. Remark: If a knot is equivalent to the circle x^ = = it is called an unknot or a trivial knot, and the corresponding knot type is called the trivial type. Besides the above definition of knot equivalence, we have another concept to describe when two knots are considered to be the "same". That is the isotopy type of a knot. As a preparation of the definition of isotopy type of a knot, we need the concept of the ambient isotopy of a topological space. Definition 2.1.4. (Ambient Isotopy) The ambient isotopy of a topological space X is a continuous mapping H from X X [0,1] to X such that H(.,t) = ht{-) is a homeomorphism from X to X for all t G [0，1] and ho(-) 二 H(� t)is the identity map of X. Now, we give a formal definition to the isotopy type of a knot. Geometric Knot Theory 5 Definition 2.1.5. {Isotopy Type of Knot) Two knots in Ki and K2 are said to be the same isotopy type (or isotopic) if there exists an ambient isotopy H of such that hi{Ki) = H(Ku 1) = K2. Clearly, if two knots are isotopic, then they are equivalent. On the converse, we have the following remark: Remark: If two knots Ki and K2 are equivalent, then they are isotopic up to a reflection. More precisely, if the homeomorphism, h, in Definition 2.1.2 is orientation preserving, then they are isotopic. If h is orientation reversing, then Ki and r{K2) are isotopic, where r is any reflection in R^. 2.1.2 Tame and Wild Knots We have defined what a knot is. Actually, in many studies of knot theory, also in our study, only one specific type of knots is considered, which is called tame knots. In fact, in most of the applications, only the tame knots appear. In this section, we will focus on defining this type of knots. Before defining the tame knot, we need to define a special kind of knots first, the polygonal knots. Definition 2.1.6. {Polygonal Knot) A polygonal knot is a knot which is the union of finitely many closed straight line segments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Khovanov Homology of Rational Tangles
    The Khovanov Homology of Rational Tangles Benjamin Thompson A thesis submitted for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy with Honours in Pure Mathematics of The Australian National University October, 2016 Dedicated to my family. Even though they’ll never read it. “To feel fulfilled, you must first have a goal that needs fulfilling.” Hidetaka Miyazaki, Edge (280) “Sleep is good. And books are better.” (Tyrion) George R. R. Martin, A Clash of Kings “Let’s love ourselves then we can’t fail to make a better situation.” Lauryn Hill, Everything is Everything iv Declaration Except where otherwise stated, this thesis is my own work prepared under the supervision of Scott Morrison. Benjamin Thompson October, 2016 v vi Acknowledgements What a ride. Above all, I would like to thank my supervisor, Scott Morrison. This thesis would not have been written without your unflagging support, sublime feedback and sage advice. My thesis would have likely consisted only of uninspired exposition had you not provided a plethora of interesting potential topics at the start, and its overall polish would have likely diminished had you not kept me on track right to the end. You went above and beyond what I expected from a supervisor, and as a result I’ve had the busiest, but also best, year of my life so far. I must also extend a huge thanks to Tony Licata for working with me throughout the year too; hopefully we can figure out what’s really going on with the bigradings! So many people to thank, so little time. I thank Joan Licata for agreeing to run a Knot Theory course all those years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Knots, Links, Spatial Graphs, and Algebraic Invariants
    689 Knots, Links, Spatial Graphs, and Algebraic Invariants AMS Special Session on Algebraic and Combinatorial Structures in Knot Theory AMS Special Session on Spatial Graphs October 24–25, 2015 California State University, Fullerton, CA Erica Flapan Allison Henrich Aaron Kaestner Sam Nelson Editors American Mathematical Society 689 Knots, Links, Spatial Graphs, and Algebraic Invariants AMS Special Session on Algebraic and Combinatorial Structures in Knot Theory AMS Special Session on Spatial Graphs October 24–25, 2015 California State University, Fullerton, CA Erica Flapan Allison Henrich Aaron Kaestner Sam Nelson Editors American Mathematical Society Providence, Rhode Island EDITORIAL COMMITTEE Dennis DeTurck, Managing Editor Michael Loss Kailash Misra Catherine Yan 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 05C10, 57M15, 57M25, 57M27. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Flapan, Erica, 1956- editor. Title: Knots, links, spatial graphs, and algebraic invariants : AMS special session on algebraic and combinatorial structures in knot theory, October 24-25, 2015, California State University, Fullerton, CA : AMS special session on spatial graphs, October 24-25, 2015, California State University, Fullerton, CA / Erica Flapan [and three others], editors. Description: Providence, Rhode Island : American Mathematical Society, [2017] | Series: Con- temporary mathematics ; volume 689 | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2016042011 | ISBN 9781470428471 (alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Knot theory–Congresses. | Link theory–Congresses. | Graph theory–Congresses. | Invariants–Congresses. | AMS: Combinatorics – Graph theory – Planar graphs; geometric and topological aspects of graph theory. msc | Manifolds and cell complexes – Low-dimensional topology – Relations with graph theory. msc | Manifolds and cell complexes – Low-dimensional topology – Knots and links in S3.msc| Manifolds and cell complexes – Low-dimensional topology – Invariants of knots and 3-manifolds.
    [Show full text]
  • Planar and Spherical Stick Indices of Knots
    PLANAR AND SPHERICAL STICK INDICES OF KNOTS COLIN ADAMS, DAN COLLINS, KATHERINE HAWKINS, CHARMAINE SIA, ROB SILVERSMITH, AND BENA TSHISHIKU Abstract. The stick index of a knot is the least number of line segments required to build the knot in space. We define two analogous 2-dimensional invariants, the planar stick index, which is the least number of line segments in the plane to build a projection, and the spherical stick index, which is the least number of great circle arcs to build a projection on the sphere. We find bounds on these quantities in terms of other knot invariants, and give planar stick and spherical stick constructions for torus knots and for compositions of trefoils. In particular, unlike most knot invariants,we show that the spherical stick index distinguishes between the granny and square knots, and that composing a nontrivial knot with a second nontrivial knot need not increase its spherical stick index. 1. Introduction The stick index s[K] of a knot type [K] is the smallest number of straight line segments required to create a polygonal conformation of [K] in space. The stick index is generally difficult to compute. However, stick indices of small crossing knots are known, and stick indices for certain infinite categories of knots have been determined: Theorem 1.1 ([Jin97]). If Tp;q is a (p; q)-torus knot with p < q < 2p, s[Tp;q] = 2q. Theorem 1.2 ([ABGW97]). If nT is a composition of n trefoils, s[nT ] = 2n + 4. Despite the interest in stick index, two-dimensional analogues have not been studied in depth.
    [Show full text]
  • On Framings of Knots in 3-Manifolds
    ON FRAMINGS OF KNOTS IN 3-MANIFOLDS RHEA PALAK BAKSHI, DIONNE IBARRA, GABRIEL MONTOYA-VEGA, JÓZEF H. PRZYTYCKI, AND DEBORAH WEEKS Abstract. We show that the only way of changing the framing of a knot or a link by ambient isotopy in an oriented 3-manifold is when the manifold has a properly embedded non-separating S2. This change of framing is given by the Dirac trick, also known as the light bulb trick. The main tool we use is based on McCullough’s work on the mapping class groups of 3-manifolds. We also relate our results to the theory of skein modules. Contents 1. Introduction1 1.1. History of the problem2 2. Preliminaries3 3. Main Results4 3.1. Proofs of the Main Theorems5 3.2. Spin structures and framings7 4. Ramications and Connections to Skein Modules8 4.1. From the Kauman bracket skein module to spin twisted homology9 4.2. The q-homology skein module9 5. Future Directions 10 6. Acknowledgements 11 References 11 1. Introduction We show that the only way to change the framing of a knot in an oriented 3-manifold by ambient isotopy is when the manifold has a properly embedded non-separating S2. More precisely the only change of framing is by the light bulb trick as illustrated in the Figure1. Here the change arXiv:2001.07782v1 [math.GT] 21 Jan 2020 of framing is very local (takes part in S2 × »0; 1¼ embedded in the manifold) and is related to the fact that the fundamental group of SO¹3º is Z2. Furthermore, we use the fact that 3-manifolds possess spin structures given by the parallelization of their tangent bundles.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can We Say 2 Knots Are Not the Same?
    How can we say 2 knots are not the same? SHRUTHI SRIDHAR What’s a knot? A knot is a smooth embedding of the circle S1 in IR3. A link is a smooth embedding of the disjoint union of more than one circle Intuitively, it’s a string knotted up with ends joined up. We represent it on a plane using curves and ‘crossings’. The unknot A ‘figure-8’ knot A ‘wild’ knot (not a knot for us) Hopf Link Two knots or links are the same if they have an ambient isotopy between them. Representing a knot Knots are represented on the plane with strands and crossings where 2 strands cross. We call this picture a knot diagram. Knots can have more than one representation. Reidemeister moves Operations on knot diagrams that don’t change the knot or link Reidemeister moves Theorem: (Reidemeister 1926) Two knot diagrams are of the same knot if and only if one can be obtained from the other through a series of Reidemeister moves. Crossing Number The minimum number of crossings required to represent a knot or link is called its crossing number. Knots arranged by crossing number: Knot Invariants A knot/link invariant is a property of a knot/link that is independent of representation. Trivial Examples: • Crossing number • Knot Representations / ~ where 2 representations are equivalent via Reidemester moves Tricolorability We say a knot is tricolorable if the strands in any projection can be colored with 3 colors such that every crossing has 1 or 3 colors and or the coloring uses more than one color.
    [Show full text]
  • Bounds for Minimal Step Number of Knots in the Simple Cubic Lattice
    Bounds for minimal step number of knots in the simple cubic lattice R. Schareiny, K. Ishiharaz, J. Arsuagay, Y. Diao¤, K. Shimokawaz and M. Vazquezyx yDepartment of Mathematics San Francisco State University 1600 Holloway Ave San Francisco, CA 94132, USA. zDepartment of Mathematics Saitama University Saitama, 338-8570, Japan. ¤Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of North Carolina Charlotte Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. Abstract. Knots are found in DNA as well as in proteins, and they have been shown to be good tools for structural analysis of these molecules. An important parameter to consider in the arti¯cial construction of these molecules is the minimal number of monomers needed to make a knot. Here we address this problem by characterizing, both analytically and numerically, the minimum length (also called minimum step number) needed to form a particular knot in the simple cubic lattice. Our analytical work is based on an improvement of a method introduced by Diao to enumerate conformations of a given knot type for a ¯xed length. This method allows to extend the previously known result on the minimum step number of the trefoil knot 31 (which is 24) to the knots 41 and 51 and show that the minimum step numbers for the 41 and 51 knots are 30 and 34 respectively. We report on numerical results resulting from a computer implementation of this method. We provide a complete list of estimates of the minimum step numbers for prime knots up to 10 crossings, which are improvements over current published numerical results. We enumerate all minimal lattice knots of a given type and partition them into classes de¯ned by BFACF type 0 moves.
    [Show full text]
  • Actions of Mapping Class Groups Athanase Papadopoulos
    Actions of mapping class groups Athanase Papadopoulos To cite this version: Athanase Papadopoulos. Actions of mapping class groups. L. Ji, A. Papadopoulos and S.-T. Yau. Handbook of Group Actions, Vol. I, 31, Higher Education Press; International Press, p. 189-248., 2014, Advanced Lectures in Mathematics, 978-7-04-041363-2. hal-01027411 HAL Id: hal-01027411 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01027411 Submitted on 21 Jul 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ACTIONS OF MAPPING CLASS GROUPS ATHANASE PAPADOPOULOS Abstract. This paper has three parts. The first part is a general introduction to rigidity and to rigid actions of mapping class group actions on various spaces. In the second part, we describe in detail four rigidity results that concern actions of mapping class groups on spaces of foliations and of laminations, namely, Thurston’s sphere of projective foliations equipped with its projective piecewise-linear structure, the space of unmeasured foliations equipped with the quotient topology, the reduced Bers boundary, and the space of geodesic laminations equipped with the Thurston topology. In the third part, we present some perspectives and open problems on other actions of mapping class groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Bounds for Equilateral Stick Numbers
    Contemporary Mathematics Upper Bounds for Equilateral Stick Numbers Eric J. Rawdon and Robert G. Scharein Abstract. We use algorithms in the software KnotPlot to compute upper bounds for the equilateral stick numbers of all prime knots through 10 cross- ings, i.e. the least number of equal length line segments it takes to construct a conformation of each knot type. We find seven knots for which we cannot construct an equilateral conformation with the same number of edges as a minimal non-equilateral conformation, notably the 819 knot. 1. Introduction Knotting and tangling appear in many physical systems in the natural sciences, e.g. in the replication of DNA. The structures in which such entanglement occurs are typically modeled by polygons, that is finitely many vertices connected by straight line segments. Topologically, the theory of knots using polygons is the same as the theory using smooth curves. However, recent research suggests that a degree of rigidity due to geometric constraints can affect the theory substantially. One could model DNA as a polygon with constraints on the edge lengths, the vertex angles, etc.. It is important to determine the degree to which geometric rigidity affects the knotting of polygons. In this paper, we explore some differences in knotting between non-equilateral and equilateral polygons with few edges. One elementary knot invariant, the stick number, denoted here by stick(K), is the minimal number of edges it takes to construct a knot equivalent to K.Richard Randell first explored the stick number in [Ran88b, Ran88a, Ran94a, Ran94b]. He showed that any knot consisting of 5 or fewer sticks must be unknotted and that stick(trefoil) = 6 and stick(figure-8) = 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Stick Number of Spatial Graphs
    STICK NUMBER OF SPATIAL GRAPHS MINJUNG LEE, SUNGJONG NO, AND SEUNGSANG OH Abstract. For a nontrivial knot K, Negami found an upper bound on the stick number s(K) in terms of its crossing number c(K) which is s(K) ≤ 2c(K). Later, Huh and Oh utilized the arc index α(K) to 3 3 present a more precise upper bound s(K) ≤ 2 c(K)+ 2 . Furthermore, Kim, No and Oh found an upper bound on the equilateral stick number s=(K) as follows; s=(K) ≤ 2c(K) + 2. As a sequel to this research program, we similarly define the stick number s(G) and the equilateral stick number s=(G) of a spatial graph G, and present their upper bounds as follows; 3 3b v s(G) ≤ c(G) + 2e + − , 2 2 2 s=(G) ≤ 2c(G) + 2e + 2b − k, where e and v are the number of edges and vertices of G, respectively, b is the number of bouquet cut-components, and k is the number of non-splittable components. 1. Introduction Throughout this paper we work in the piecewise linear category. A graph is a finite set of vertices connected by edges allowing loops and multiple edges. A spatial graph is a graph embedded in R3. We consider two spatial graphs to be the same if they are equivalent under ambient isotopy. A bouquet is a spatial graph consisting of only one vertex and loops. Note that a knot is a spatial graph consisting of a vertex and a loop. A stick spatial graph is a spatial graph which consists of finite line seg- ments, called sticks, as drawn in Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knot Theory Course at the Ium
    THE KNOT THEORY COURSE AT THE IUM Mathematical knot theory studies certain types of curves in Euclidean space R3, namely knots, links, and braids. A knot, roughly speaking, is an oriented closed curve (without self-intersections) in Euclidean space R3 considered up to a natural equivalence relation, called isotopy. Intuitively, you should think of a knot as a thin elastic string that can be stretched, compressed, and moved about in space but may not be cut and glued back. Here are some examples of knots : (a) the unknot or trivial knot; (b) the trefoil; (c) the figure eight knot; (d) the granny knot; (e) the knot known as 52; (f) a knot isotopic to one of the first five (try to guess – which one?). Рис. 1. Examples of knots 1 2 A link, roughly speaking, is a set of several pairwise nonintersecting closed curves in R3 without self-intersections. Intuitively, you should think of a link as several thin elastic strings that can be stretched, compressed, and moved about in space but may not be cut and glued back. Here are some examples of links: (a) the trivial two component link; (b) the Hopf link; (c) the Whitehead link; (d) the Borromeo rings. Рис. 2. Examples of links Roughly speaking, a braid in n strings is an ordered set of pairwise non- intersecting curves moving downward from n aligned points of a horizontal plane to n similarly aligned points of a second horizontal plane. You can think of the strings of a braid as being thin elastic strings can be stretched, compressed, and moved about in space, but may not be cut and glued back.
    [Show full text]
  • Mia Nguyen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Mathematics
    The Hexagonal Lattice Number of the Figure Eight is 11 2019 Nebraska Conference for Undergraduate Women in Mathematics Mia Nguyen University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Mathematics Quick review of knot theory are able to make some estimates about the stick number of some simple knots. From the cubic model of the knot, we project it Knot theory is a branch of topology that studies three- onto the xyw-plane and transform it to hexagonal lattice. For dimensional manifolds. A mathematical knot is a closed curve the conversion, the angle of 30o at each corner and the minimal that is embedded in 3-dimensional Euclidean space. Two or number of sticks are prominent. more knots combined together are considered as a link. It is not obvious to determine if 2 given knots are equivalent to each other or not. Proving stick number of the figure eight is Definition of hexagonal lattice 11 Hexagonal lattice includes points such that an equilateral trian- gle is formed by every 3 nearby points. There are 4 orientations associated with the lattice, one goes up, one goes to the right, and 2 oblique axes. The simple hexagonal lattice is defined as the point lattice where x = <1, 0, 0>, y = <1/2, 3/2, 0>, w = <0, 0, 1>, and z = y - x. Figure 5: The 52 knot and its projection in the simple hexagonal lattice. The x-stick, y-, z-, and w-sticks are straight line segments that are parallel to directions of x, y, z, and w. Stick number is the In Figure 5, jP jx = 2; jP jy = 4; jP jz = 3; jP jw = 5, and smallest number of edges needed to form a knot.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology
    Problems in Low-Dimensional Topology Edited by Rob Kirby Berkeley - 22 Dec 95 Contents 1 Knot Theory 7 2 Surfaces 85 3 3-Manifolds 97 4 4-Manifolds 179 5 Miscellany 259 Index of Conjectures 282 Index 284 Old Problem Lists 294 Bibliography 301 1 2 CONTENTS Introduction In April, 1977 when my first problem list [38,Kirby,1978] was finished, a good topologist could reasonably hope to understand the main topics in all of low dimensional topology. But at that time Bill Thurston was already starting to greatly influence the study of 2- and 3-manifolds through the introduction of geometry, especially hyperbolic. Four years later in September, 1981, Mike Freedman turned a subject, topological 4-manifolds, in which we expected no progress for years, into a subject in which it seemed we knew everything. A few months later in spring 1982, Simon Donaldson brought gauge theory to 4-manifolds with the first of a remarkable string of theorems showing that smooth 4-manifolds which might not exist or might not be diffeomorphic, in fact, didn’t and weren’t. Exotic R4’s, the strangest of smooth manifolds, followed. And then in late spring 1984, Vaughan Jones brought us the Jones polynomial and later Witten a host of other topological quantum field theories (TQFT’s). Physics has had for at least two decades a remarkable record for guiding mathematicians to remarkable mathematics (Seiberg–Witten gauge theory, new in October, 1994, is the latest example). Lest one think that progress was only made using non-topological techniques, note that Freedman’s work, and other results like knot complements determining knots (Gordon- Luecke) or the Seifert fibered space conjecture (Mess, Scott, Gabai, Casson & Jungreis) were all or mostly classical topology.
    [Show full text]