Hand Transplantation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
| Hand Transplantation Scott M. Tintle, MD » Upper extremity limb loss is catastrophic. It affects nearly every Benjamin K. Potter, MD activity of daily living, leaving patients with substantial disability. River M. Elliott, MD » Despite high rates of rejection of upper extremity prostheses, hand transplantation remains controversial. L. Scott Levin, MD » The indications for hand transplantation remain relatively ill defined. » The American Society for Reconstructive Transplantation (ASRT) and Investigation performed at the University of Pennsylvania, the International Registry on Hand and Composite Tissue Transplan- Philadelphia, Pennsylvania tation (IRHCTT) have been founded to advance the science, to educate, to report outcomes, and to define the indications for vascularized composite allotransplantation. pper extremity loss repre- Pioneers of hand transplantation rec- sents a life-changing, often ognized that prosthetic devices probably devastating event, affecting would never completely satisfy the upper nearly every activity of daily extremity amputee for these very reasons. livingU and subsequently leaving a patient Even if the prehensile function and dex- with substantial disability1,2. The potential terity of the human hand could be restored, immediate dependency and despair result- these would do little to restore patient ing from the loss of one or both hands body image or hand sensibility, both traits cannot be overstated. Promising techno- coveted by amputees. Rather, they postu- logical advances in upper extremity pros- lated that these could only be replaced with theses include improved neural-control “like” human tissue14. The field of vascu- interfaces, multiple-degrees-of-freedom larized composite allotransplantation has terminal devices, and prototype haptic grown from this basic desire to fully feedback mechanisms3,4. However, the restore both the functional and emotional available literature still demonstrates high aspects of the human hand, building on the prosthesis rejection rates for upper ex- foundations developed by solid organ tremity amputees5-12, suggesting that transplantation, hand surgery, and recon- prostheses continue to inadequately repli- structive microsurgery. cate the complex, prehensile functions of The concept of using composite tissue the native hand and arm. The most com- allograft was first suggested in 1960 by monly cited reasons for upper extremity Peacock, when he utilized cadaveric flexor prosthesis rejection remain limited useful- tendons along with their synovial sheaths ness, weight, and residual limb in order to reconstruct end-stage tendon discomfort5,13. incarcerations that otherwise would have Disclosure: None of the authors received payments or services, either directly or indirectly (i.e., via his or her institution), from a third party in support of any aspect of this work. One or more of the authors, or his or her institution, has had a financial relationship, in the thirty-six months prior to submission of this work, with an entity in the biomedical arena that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. No author has had any other relationships, or has engaged in any other activities, that could be perceived to influence or have the potential to influence what is written in this work. The complete Disclosures of Potential Conflicts of Interest submitted by authors are always provided with the online version of the article. COPYRIGHT © 2014 BY THE Disclaimer: The opinions and assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the United States Army, United States SURGERY, INCORPORATED Navy, Department of Defense, or the US Government. JBJS REVIEWS 2014;2(1):e1 · http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.M.00063 1 | Hand Transplantation required amputation15-18. Shortly after Indications for Transplantation and reconstructive and transplant surgery. this early success with composite tissue Ethical Considerations Last year, the ASRT published guide- allografts, and likely inspired by the “Primum non nocere”—“first do no lines for medical necessity determina- rapid growth of the solid organ trans- harm”—remains a paramount principle tion for transplantation of the hand and/ plantation community, the world’s first as the field of vascularized composite or upper extremity (Fig. 1). hand transplantation was performed in allotransplantation progresses. In the South America in 19641,19,20. Unfor- 2002 position statement of the Ameri- Psychological Screening tunately, probably because of the rela- can Society for Surgery of the Hand, The majority of amputee patients are tively primitive immunosuppression Cooney and Hentz echoed this senti- afflicted by a psychological disorder33. as well as a lack of basic-science prepa- ment when they recommended “great This consideration complicates hand ration, acute rejection predictably caution and a measured approach to the transplantation in that the outcome of occurred and the transplanted limb patient requesting a limb transplant.”28 a hand transplantation is very much was amputated about three weeks This caution, along with appropriate dependent on the participation, coop- later15,21. Perhaps reflecting the scien- ethical considerations, have tempered eration, and compliance of a patient tific hazards of reaching too far, too the growth of vascularized composite with hand therapy, medications, and fast, the next attempt at hand trans- allotransplantation as compared with follow-up screening appointments. plantation did not occur until thirty- solid organ transplantation. Hand A kidney, liver, or heart transplant four years later in Lyon, France, in transplantation is very different from depends only on compliance with 199815,22,23. Technically, this second most solid organ transplantations in medications, and even still there are procedure succeeded; however, this that the candidate for hand transplan- relatively high rates of medication non- success was not functionally realized tation is not faced with a life-or-death compliance in this population34,35.In and sustained because the patient did decision29. For this reason, developing a combined heart and heart/lung trans- not adapt psychologically to the new widely accepted indications for subject- plant population, it was found that hand and discontinued the use of ing a physiologically healthy person to the only risk factor for graft loss between immunosuppressive medications. The the risks of life-long immunosuppres- six and twelve months was being transplanted limb was eventually sion remains a challenge for the allo- unmarried or not living in a stable amputated1. The first hand transplan- transplantation community30. relationship34,35. It is therefore impera- tation in the United States was per- In 2009, Hollenbeck et al. indi- tive that all patients who are to be formed the following year in Louisville, cated that there were no current, well- considered for hand transplantation Kentucky. At the time of writing, this defined indications for vascularized undergo extensive psychological and third patient still had the transplanted composite allotransplantation of the psychiatric screening prior to selection hand, nearly fourteen years later15,24. hand or face14. Unfortunately, this for hand transplantation. In addition, The early success of hand trans- remains the case today31,32—the indi- the social support for an individual plantation in the late 1990s was made cations remain open to interpretation candidate must be identified, and a possible by advances in solid organ by individual vascularized composite transplantation should not occur if transplantation. Specifically, the devel- allotransplantation centers. While this the surgeon is not comfortable with opment of new medications such autonomy to develop indications to the patient’s support system. as cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and accompany slightly different approaches mycophenolate mofetil made the is ostensibly important in a developing Immunosuppression avoidance of rejection possible. In ad- field, the vascularized composite allo- Conventional Immunosuppression dition, animal models of vascularized transplantation community is attempt- Aside from the ethical issues surround- composite allotransplantation provided ing to develop universally accepted ing hand transplantation, perhaps the the basic and translational science evi- indications for hand transplantation most critical reason that vascularized dence that successful composite tissue based on the evidence available. Having composite allotransplantation has lag- allotransplantation without rejection recognized the need for defined and ged behind solid organ transplantation was possible with use of these accepted indications for hand trans- is the skin. Skin is the most antigenic medications15,25-27. Since that time, the plantation, the allotransplantation tissue of the composite tissues that field of vascularized composite allo- community founded the American constitute a hand transplant, and pre- transplantation has grown dramatically. Society for Reconstructive Transplan- venting the immune system from Eighty-nine hand transplantations tation (ASRT) in 2008. The goal rejecting the skin was necessary prior to have been performed worldwide to date, of the ASRT is to provide a platform successful hand transplantation1,36-38. and there are at least seven centers in for the advancement of education, sci- In