DOCSLIB.ORG

Plate Dynamics, Mantle Structure and Tectonic Evolution of the Caribbean Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Plate Dynamics, Mantle Structure and Tectonic Evolution of the Caribbean Region Plate dynamics, mantle structure and tectonic evolution of the Caribbean region Steven van Benthem UTRECHT STUDIES IN EARTH SCIENCES NO 044 Members of the Assessment Committee: Prof. Dr. G. Bertotti Department of Geosciences and Engineering, Delft University of Technology Delft, the Netherlands Prof. Dr. S.A.P.L. Cloetingh Department of Earth Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands Dr. L. Kennan Shell Global Solutions International Rijswijk, the Netherlands Prof. Dr. R.L.M. Vissers Department of Earth Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands Prof. Dr. W. Spakman Department of Earth Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands The research of this thesis was carried out at: Tectonophysics group Department of Earth Sciences Faculty of Geosciences Utrecht University Budapestlaan 4 3584CD Utrecht The Netherlands ISBN: 978-90-6266-340-8 Printed in the Netherlands by Wöhrmann Print Service, Zutphen Copyright © 2013 Steven van Benthem Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden vermenigvuldigd en/of openbaar gemaakt door middel van druk, fotokopie of op welke andere wijze dan ook zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de auteur. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, by print or photo print, microfilm or any other means, without written permission of the author. Cover illustration: Seismicity and topography of the Caribbean region. Plate dynamics, mantle structure and tectonic evolution of the Caribbean region De plaatdynamica, mantelstructuur en de tektonische evolutie van het Caribisch gebied (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof.dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 28 oktober 2013 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Steven Arnout Cornelus van Benthem geboren op 23 augustus 1979 te Zwolle, Nederland Promotor: Prof. Dr. M.J.R. Wortel Co-promotor: Dr. R.M.A. Govers The research described in this thesis was financially supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research / Earth and Life-Sciences (NWO / ALW). Para Alba Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 9 1.1 Short overview of the tectonic history of the Caribbean plate ........................................................ 9 1.2 Studies on the structure of the mantle under the Caribbean. .......................................................... 9 1.3 Models for slab structure under the northeastern Caribbean ........................................................ 11 1.4 Aim of this thesis .................................................................................................................................. 13 1.5 Thesis outline ........................................................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 2 The Caribbean plate; pulled, pushed or dragged? ................................................ 16 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.1 The Caribbean plate ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Forces on the Caribbean plate: ........................................................................................................... 20 2.2.1 Driving forces ................................................................................................................................. 20 2.2.2 Coupling stresses to the sub-lithospheric mantle ..................................................................... 21 2.2.3 Resistive forces ............................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.4 Torque balance ............................................................................................................................... 23 2.3 Torque balance results ......................................................................................................................... 23 2.4 Stress, rotation and fault slip ............................................................................................................... 24 2.4.1 Model setup .................................................................................................................................... 25 2.4.2 Grouping models ........................................................................................................................... 26 2.5 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 26 2.6 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 35 Acknowledgements..................................................................................................................................... 36 Appendix ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 Chapter 3 Tectonic evolution and mantle structure of the Caribbean ................................... 38 3.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 38 3.2 Mantle structure under the Caribbean region ................................................................................. 44 3.2.1 The tomographic model and resolution ..................................................................................... 44 3.2.2 Connecting tectonic evolution with mantle structure .............................................................. 45 3.2.3 An overview of imaged slabs ....................................................................................................... 45 3.3 Comparing tectonic reconstructions with imaged mantle structure ............................................. 47 3.3.1 Overall constraints on tectonic reconstructions ....................................................................... 47 3.3.2 Lesser Antilles subduction............................................................................................................ 47 3.3.3 Muertos subduction ....................................................................................................................... 53 3.3.4 South Caribbean subduction ........................................................................................................ 53 3.3.5 Nicaragua Rise subduction ........................................................................................................... 54 3.3.6 Farallon subduction and the Great Arc of the Caribbean ....................................................... 54 3.3.7 Cocos plate subduction and the Panama slab window ............................................................ 58 3.4 Scoring tectonic reconstructions ........................................................................................................ 60 3.5 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................................... 61 3.6 Appendix ............................................................................................................................................. 613 Chapter 4 What drives microplate motion and deformation in the northeastern Caribbean plate boundary region? ............................................................................................................ 65 4.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 65 4.2 Mechanisms for plate boundary deformation in the northeastern Caribbean ............................ 67 4.2.1 Bahamas collision .......................................................................................................................... 67 4.2.2 Slab Edge Push .............................................................................................................................. 70 4.2.3 Two mechanisms acting in concert ............................................................................................. 71 4.3 Model setup .......................................................................................................................................... 72 4.3.1 Domain and material properties .................................................................................................. 72 4.3.2 Boundary conditions for the Present-day models ..................................................................... 72 4.3.3 Boundary conditions for models for 30-2.5 Ma ........................................................................ 75 4.3.4 Regional faults/shear zones in the Caribbean plate ................................................................. 75 4.3.5 Calculation of uplift rate ............................................................................................................... 80 4.4 Benchmarking and analysis of present-day models ........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Describe the Geometry of a Fault (1) Orientation of the Plane (Strike and Dip) (2) Slip Vector
    Learning goals - January 16, 2012 You will understand how to: Describe the geometry of a fault (1) orientation of the plane (strike and dip) (2) slip vector Understand concept of slip rate and how it is estimated Describe faults (the above plus some jargon weʼll need) Categories of Faults (EOSC 110 version) “Normal” fault “Thrust” or “reverse” fault “Strike-slip” or “transform” faults Two kinds of strike-slip faults Right-lateral Left-lateral (dextral) (sinistral) Stand with your feet on either side of the fault. Which side comes toward you when the fault slips? Another way to tell: stand on one side of the fault looking toward it. Which way does the block on the other side move? Right-lateral Left-lateral (dextral) (sinistral) 1992 M 7.4 Landers, California Earthquake rupture (SCEC) Describing the fault geometry: fault plane orientation How do you usually describe a plane (with lines)? In geology, we choose these two lines to be: • strike • dip strike dip • strike is the azimuth of the line where the fault plane intersects the horizontal plane. Measured clockwise from N. • dip is the angle with respect to the horizontal of the line of steepest descent (perpendic. to strike) (a ball would roll down it). strike “60°” dip “30° (to the SE)” Profile view, as often shown on block diagrams strike 30° “hanging wall” “footwall” 0° N Map view Profile view 90° W E 270° S 180° Strike? Dip? 45° 45° Map view Profile view Strike? Dip? 0° 135° Indicating direction of slip quantitatively: the slip vector footwall • let’s define the slip direction (vector)
    [Show full text]
  • Mercian 11 B Hunter.Indd
    The Cressbrook Dale Lava and Litton Tuff, between Longstone and Hucklow Edges, Derbyshire John Hunter and Richard Shaw Abstract: With only a small exposure near the head of its eponymous dale, the Cressbrook Dale Lava is the least exposed of the major lava flows interbedded within the Carboniferous platform- carbonate succession of the Derbyshire Peak District. It underlies a large area of the limestone plateau between Longstone Edge and the Eyam and Hucklow edges. The recent closure of all of the quarries and underground mines in this area provided a stimulus to locate and compile the existing subsurface information relating to the lava-field and, supplemented by airborne geophysical survey results, to use these data to interpret the buried volcanic landscape. The same sub-surface data-set is used to interpret the spatial distribution of the overlying Litton Tuff. Within the regional north-south crustal extension that survey indicate that the outcrops of igneous rocks in affected central and northern Britain on the north side the White Peak are only part of a much larger volcanic of the Wales-Brabant High during the early part of the field, most of which is concealed at depth beneath Carboniferous, a province of subsiding platforms, tilt- Millstone Grit and Coal Measures farther east. Because blocks and half-grabens developed beneath a shallow no large volcano structures have been discovered so continental sea. Intra-plate magmatism accompanied far, geological literature describes the lavas in the the lithospheric thinning, with basic igneous rocks White Peak as probably originating from four separate erupting at different times from a number of small, local centres, each being active in a different area at different volcanic centres scattered across a region extending times (Smith et al., 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Ductile Deformation - Concepts of Finite Strain
    327 Ductile deformation - Concepts of finite strain Deformation includes any process that results in a change in shape, size or location of a body. A solid body subjected to external forces tends to move or change its displacement. These displacements can involve four distinct component patterns: - 1) A body is forced to change its position; it undergoes translation. - 2) A body is forced to change its orientation; it undergoes rotation. - 3) A body is forced to change size; it undergoes dilation. - 4) A body is forced to change shape; it undergoes distortion. These movement components are often described in terms of slip or flow. The distinction is scale- dependent, slip describing movement on a discrete plane, whereas flow is a penetrative movement that involves the whole of the rock. The four basic movements may be combined. - During rigid body deformation, rocks are translated and/or rotated but the original size and shape are preserved. - If instead of moving, the body absorbs some or all the forces, it becomes stressed. The forces then cause particle displacement within the body so that the body changes its shape and/or size; it becomes deformed. Deformation describes the complete transformation from the initial to the final geometry and location of a body. Deformation produces discontinuities in brittle rocks. In ductile rocks, deformation is macroscopically continuous, distributed within the mass of the rock. Instead, brittle deformation essentially involves relative movements between undeformed (but displaced) blocks. Finite strain jpb, 2019 328 Strain describes the non-rigid body deformation, i.e. the amount of movement caused by stresses between parts of a body.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma: Modeling and Uncertainties
    Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment of the Meers Fault, Southwestern Oklahoma: Modeling and Uncertainties Emma M. Baker and Austin A. Holland Special Publication SP2013-02 DRAFT REPORT MAY 16, 2013 OKLAHOMA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Sarkeys Energy Center 100 East Boyd St., Rm. N-131 Norman, Oklahoma 73019-0628 SPECIAL PUBLICATION SERIES The Oklahoma Geological Survey’s Special Publication series is designed to bring new geologic information to the public in a manner efficient in both time and cost. The material undergoes a minimum of editing and is published for the most part as a final, author-prepared report. Each publication is numbered according to the year in which it was published and the order of its publication within that year. Gaps in the series occur when a publication has gone out of print or when no applicable publications were issued in that year. This publication is issued by the Oklahoma Geological Survey as authorized by Title 70, Oklahoma Statutes, 1971, Section 3310, and Title 74, Oklahoma Statutes, 1971, Sections 231-238. This publication is only available as an electronic publication. 1. Table of Contents 2. Summary .................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 5 3.1. Geologic Background ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coulomb Stress Evolution in Northeastern Caribbean Over the Past 250 Years Due to Coseismic, Postseismic and Interseismic Deformation
    Geophys. J. Int. (2008) 174, 904–918 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03634.x Coulomb stress evolution in Northeastern Caribbean over the past 250 years due to coseismic, postseismic and interseismic deformation Syed Tabrez Ali,1 Andrew M. Freed,1 Eric Calais,1 David M. Manaker1,∗ and William R. McCann2 1Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Dr, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 2Earth Scientific Consultants, 10210 West 102nd Ave, Westminster, CO 80021,USA Accepted 2007 September 24. Received 2007 September 19; in original form 2007 July 21 SUMMARY The Northeastern Caribbean region accommodates ∼20 mm yr−1 of oblique convergence be- tween the North American and Caribbean plates, which is distributed between the subduction interface and major strike-slip faults within the overriding plate. As a result, this heavily populated region has experienced eleven large (M ≥ 7.0) earthquakes over the past 250 yr. In an effort to improve our understanding of the location and timing of these earthquakes, with an eye to understand where current seismic hazards may be greatest, we calculate the evolution of Coulomb stress on the major faults since 1751 due to coseismic, postseismic, and interseismic deformation. Our results quantify how earthquakes serve to relieve stress accumulated due to interseismic loading and how fault systems communicate with each other, serving both to advance or retard subsequent events. We find that the observed progressive westwards propagation of earthquakes on the Septentrional and Enriquillo strike-slip faults and along the megathrust was encouraged by coseismic stress changes associated with prior earthquakes.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANE DIP and STRIKE, LINEATION PLUNGE and TREND, STRUCTURAL MEASURMENT CONVENTIONS, the BRUNTON COMPASS, FIELD BOOK, and NJGS FMS
    PLANE DIP and STRIKE, LINEATION PLUNGE and TREND, STRUCTURAL MEASURMENT CONVENTIONS, THE BRUNTON COMPASS, FIELD BOOK, and NJGS FMS The word azimuth stems from an Arabic word meaning "direction“, and means an angular measurement in a spherical coordinate system. In structural geology, we primarily deal with land navigation and directional readings on two-dimensional maps of the Earth surface, and azimuth commonly refers to incremental measures in a circular (0- 360 °) and horizontal reference frame relative to land surface. Sources: Lisle, R. J., 2004, Geological Structures and Maps, A Practical Guide, Third edition http://www.geo.utexas.edu/courses/420k/PDF_files/Brunton_Compass_09.pdf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Azimuth http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brunton_compass FLASH DRIVE/Rider/PDFs/Holcombe_conv_and_meas.pdf http://www.state.nj.us/dep/njgs/geodata/fmsdoc/fmsuser.htm Brunton Pocket Transit Rider Structural Geology 310 2012 GCHERMAN 1 PlanePlane DipDip andand LinearLinear PlungePlunge horizontal dddooo Dip = dddooo Bedding and other geological layers and planes that are not horizontal are said to dip. The dip is the slope of a geological surface. There are two aspects to the dip of a plane: (a) the direction of dip , which is the compass direction towards which the plane slopes; and (b) the angle of dip , which is the angle that the plane makes with a horizontal plane (Fig. 2.3). The direction of dip can be visualized as the direction in which water would flow if poured onto the plane. The angle of dip is an angle between 0 ° (for horizontal planes) and 90 ° (for vertical planes). To record the dip of a plane all that is needed are two numbers; the angle of dip followed by the direction (or azimuth) of dip, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Earthquake B-Values and Crustal Stresses in A
    PUBLICATIONS Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Relationship Between Earthquake b-Values and Crustal 10.1002/2017GL076694 Stresses in a Young Orogenic Belt Key Points: Yih-Min Wu1,2,3 , Sean Kuanhsiang Chen1 , Ting-Chung Huang1 , Hsin-Hua Huang2, • The negative linear relationship 4 5,6 between earthquake b-values and Wei-An Chao , and Ivan Koulakov fi crustal stresses is veri ed in a young 1 2 orogenic belt for the first time Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, 3 4 • A high correlation between the Taipei, Taiwan, National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, NARLabs, Taipei, Taiwan, Department of Civil b-value and stress is derived from Engineering, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 5Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, a complete earthquake catalog SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia, 6Department of Geology and Geophysics, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia regionally • b-values could serve as stress indicators in a young orogenic belt Abstract It has been reported that earthquake b-values decrease linearly with the differential stresses in the continental crust and subduction zones. Here we report a regression-derived relation between earthquake b-values and crustal stresses using the Anderson fault parameter (Aϕ) in a young orogenic belt of Correspondence to: Taiwan. This regression relation is well established by using a large and complete earthquake catalog for Y.-M. Wu, [email protected]; Taiwan. The data set consists of b-values and Aϕ values derived from relocated earthquakes and focal [email protected] mechanisms, respectively. Our results show that b-values decrease linearly with the Aϕ values at crustal depths with a high correlation coefficient of À0.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Tectonic Structures Across the Eastern African Rift Likely to Pose the Greatest Earthquake Hazard in Kenya
    Tectonic Structures Across the Eastern African Rift Likely to Pose the Greatest Earthquake Hazard in Kenya Josphat K.Mulwa and Fumiaki Kimata University of Nairobi, Department of Geology, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya; Research Center for Seismology, Volcanology and Disaster Mitigation, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, 4648601, Japan [email protected]; [email protected] Keywords: Tectonic structures, Teleseismic, body-wave Ocean. These zones of strong earthquakes are the likely to inversion, Seismotectonics pose the greatest earthquake hazard in the region. ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Earthquakes in Kenya are likely to be concentrated along Tectonic structures exist across Eastern Africa (Figure 1). the Kenya Rift Valley due to the slow divergent movement These zones are potential areas for earthquakes which can of the rift and hydrothermal processes within the pose a threat and subsequent challenge to attaining geothermal fields. This implies slow but continuous economic development in order to attain Vision 2030. In radiation of seismic energy which relieves stress in the view of this, we try to investigate if the tectonic structures subsurface rocks. It is therefore unlikely that the Kenya rift pose any serious potential earthquake hazard in Kenya and poses significant earthquake hazard in Kenya. adjacent countries. On the contrary, the NW-SE trending rift/shear zones such The geology, tectonics and volcanism in Kenya since the as the Aswa-Nyangia fault zone and the Muglad-Anza- Tertiary are discussed elsewhere and readers are referred to Lamu rift zone are more likely sites of major earthquakes in Baker (1986, 1987), Baker and Wohlenberg, (1971), Baker Kenya and the East African region.
    [Show full text]
  • Focal Mechanism
    Earthquake Source Mechanics Lecture 5 Earthquake Focal Mechanism GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD What is Seismotectonics? Study of earthquakes as a tectonic component, divided into three principal areas. 1. Spatial and temporal distribution of seismic activity a) Location of large earthquakes and global earthquake catalogues b) Temporal distribution of seismic activity 2. Earthquake focal mechanisms 3. Physics of the earthquake source through analysis of seismograms GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Location of large earthquakes and the global earthquake catalogues ß Historically of crucial importance in the development of plate tectonics theory a It was the recognition of a continuous belt of seismicity across the North Atlantic (together with profiles measured by marine geophysicists) that allowed Ewing & Heezen to predict the existence of a worldwide system of mid-ocean rifts ß Goter extended this work in the 60’s & 70’s to compile global seismicity maps delineating the plate boundaries a Similar maps at larger scale constructed from regional and local seismic networks allow the tectonics to be studied in much finer detail GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Global seismicity GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Earthquake focal mechanisms ß Using teleseismic earthquake records to determine the earthquake focal mechanism or fault plane solution and deduce the tectonics of a region ß Similar work now done at larger scale for looking at regional and local tectonics - neotectonics GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD The Seismic Source ß Shear faulting a Simple model of the seismic source 1. Fracture criterion 2.
    [Show full text]
  • EPS 116 – Laboratory Structural Geology Lab Exercise #1 Spring 2016
    EPS 116 – Laboratory Structural Geology LAB #1 – Orientation of Structures in Space Familiarize yourself with the following terms. Sketch each feature and include relevant details, e.g., footwall, hanging wall, motion arrows, etc. Also always include at least 3 horizontal layers and an up arrow in the cross sections and a north arrow in each map view. Stress vs. Strain Feature Cross Section Map View compression tension Horst and contraction/shortening Graben extension (Label hanging /foot wall and slip Brittle Deformation direction) joint fault earthquake Thrust Fault thrust/reverse fault (Label hanging / normal fault footwall and slip footwall direction) hanging wall strike-slip fault right lateral or dextral Anticline left lateral (Label hinge axis, or sinistral force direction, dip-slip contact topo lines in map view) oblique-slip Ductile Deformation fold Normal Fault anticline (Label hanging / footwall and slip syncline direction) Map View longitude latitude geographic vs. magnetic north Syncline topography (Label hinge axis, scale force direction, profile contact topo lines in map view) Strike-Slip fault (Label hanging / footwall and slip direction) Lab Exercise #1 Spring 2016 Page 1 of 9 EPS 116 – Laboratory Structural Geology Strike & Dip Strike and dip describe the orientation of a plane in space. Example: the peaked roof of a house: Strike Line Dip Direction Strike is the orientation of the intersection line of the plane in question (roof of a house) with the horizontal plane. If you were to look down on the house from directly above, it would look like this: North Strike Line Strike The angle between the strike line and north is used to describe the strike.
    [Show full text]
  • Weber Et Al., 2001A; Pérez Et Al., 2001]
    PUBLICATIONS Tectonics RESEARCH ARTICLE Tectonic inversion in the Caribbean-South American 10.1002/2014TC003665 plate boundary: GPS geodesy, seismology, Key Points: and tectonics of the Mw 6.7 22 April • The 22 April 1997 Mw 6.7 Tobago earthquake inverted a low-angle 1997 Tobago earthquake thrust fault • Seismology, GPS, and modeling John C. Weber1, Halldor Geirsson2, Joan L. Latchman3, Kenton Shaw1, Peter La Femina2, resolve coseismic slip, fault geometry, 4 3 1 4,5 and moment Shimon Wdowinski , Machel Higgins , Christopher Churches , and Edmundo Norabuena • Coseismic slip subsided Tobago and 1 2 moved it NNE Department of Geology, Grand Valley State College, Allendale, Michigan, USA, Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA, 3Seismic Research Centre, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago, 4RSMAS-Geodesy Lab, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA, 5Now at Instituto Geofisica del Peru, Lima, Peru Correspondence to: J. C. Weber, [email protected] Abstract On 22 April 1997 the largest earthquake recorded in the Trinidad-Tobago segment of the Caribbean-South American plate boundary zone (Mw 6.7) ruptured a shallow (~9 km), ENE striking (~250° Citation: azimuth), shallowly dipping (~28°) dextral-normal fault ~10 km south of Tobago. In this study, we describe Weber, J. C., H. Geirsson, J. L. Latchman, this earthquake and related foreshock and aftershock seismicity, derive coseismic offsets using GPS data, K. Shaw, P. La Femina, S. Wdowinski, M. Higgins, C. Churches, and E. Norabuena and model the fault plane and magnitude of slip for this earthquake. Coseismic slip estimated at our episodic (2015), Tectonic inversion in the GPS sites indicates movement of Tobago 135 ± 6 to 68 ± 6 mm NNE and subsidence of 7 ± 9 to 0 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Reactivation and Overprinting of the Eastern Rand
    STRUCTURAL REACTIVATION AND OVERPRINTING OF THE EASTERN RAND THRUST COMPLEX, MOJAVE DESERT, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of California State Polytechnic University, Pomona In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science In Geological Sciences By Andrew H. McLarty 2014 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research represents devotion and perseverance in something I truly love, not only as a student but as a professional geologist. I am extremely pleased to present the following to California State Polytechnic University, Pomona. I want to personally thank my advisor Dr. Nourse for recommending this project to me; words do not do justice for what you have taught me. Over the past 20+ years I have had many mentors, who have made me the geologist I am today. Those of which are; my father, Mark McLarty, Dr. Tarman, Dr. Jessey, Dr. Herber, and last but not least Dr. Nourse, thank you all. This process of being a grad student at this stage of my life has been difficult at times and it would not have been possible without the support, love and guidance from my wife, Sarah, and my two children, Madison and Kylie. Sarah, you have reminded me numerously not to give up, reminded me to be persistent, bear down, and to focus on my goals, thank you Michi and my lil ones, for all your love and support. I would also like to thank, fellow grad student, Logan Wicks for all your help, not only in the field, but with other aspects regarding this project. His abilities as a geologist and field geologists, to observe and recognize geologic aspects in the field is astonishing.
    [Show full text]