DOCSLIB.ORG

International Taxation of Real Estate Investments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
International Taxation of Real Estate Investments International Taxation of Real Estate Investments 2020 Survey on Europe, America, Australia and BRIC countries International Taxation of Real Estate Investments 2020 Survey on Europe, America, Australia and BRIC countries About WTS Global Contents With representation in over 100 countries, WTS Global has already grown to a leadership position as a global tax practice oDering the full range of tax services and aspires to become the preeminent non-audit tax practice worldwide. 6 Albania 330 Korea WTS Global deliberately refrains from conducting annual audits in order to avoid 14 Argentina 338 Latvia any conflicts of interest and to be the long-term trusted advisor for its international clients. Clients of WTS Global include multinational companies, international 20 Australia 346 Lithuania mid-size companies as well as private clients and family oGces. 34 Austria 358 Luxembourg 52 Belarus 370 Mexico The member firms of WTS Global are carefully selected through stringent quality reviews. They are strong local players in their home market who are united by the 62 Belgium 380 Moldova ambition of building a truly global practice that develops the tax leaders of the 82 Bosnia & 386 Montenegre future and anticipates the new digital tax world. Herzegovina 392 Netherlands WTS Global eDectively combines senior tax expertise from diDerent cultures 90 Brazil 402 Norway and backgrounds and oDers world-class skills in advisory, in-house, regulatory 100 Bulgaria 416 Poland and digital, coupled with the ability to think like experienced business people in a constantly changing world. 110 Canada 426 Portugal 122 China 442 Romania For more information please see: www.wts.com/global 132 Croatia 454 Russia 140 Cyprus 466 Serbia 152 Czech Republic 474 Singapore 166 Denmark 490 Slovakia 182 Estonia 498 Slovenia 190 Finland 510 South Africa 210 France 520 Spain 230 Germany 532 Sweden 244 Greece 544 Switzerland 260 Hong Kong 554 Turkey 270 Hungary 572 Ukraine 282 India 586 United Kingdom 306 Italy 606 United States 322 Japan of America 2 3 Editorial Dear Readers, We are very happy to present to you the fifth edition of our Real Estate Investment Guide. As usual, our guide provides you with a comprehensive overview of all real estate related tax aspects in 50 countries. The information is based on the experience of dedicated real estate tax practitioners of WTS Global. Global commercial real estate investments reached an all-time high of USD 800bn in 2019 as investors continued to seek out the solid return and relative stability of this asset class. Despite the corona crisis, we do not anticipate major changes in the attractiveness of real estate assets, especially due to the fact that the spending policy of national budgets “stabilize” the low interest environment and the bottleneck of valid investment opportunities. In parallel, the deficit spending increases the importance of taxation for the fiscal authorities. Therefore tax issues related to real estate remain crucial. This guide will for the first time only be available in digital form, with no printed version. This is a humble contribution of WTS Global to the environment. In addition to thanking our readers for your continued support and helpful feedback, we would like to express our gratitude towards all colleagues of the WTS global network who have contributed to this edition and without whom we would not have been able to put together such a concise, yet comprehensive guide. We furthermore extend a special “Thank you!” to our colleague Tamas Dely from WTS Global Business Development for his valuable organisational contribution and the pleasant lay-out of the guide. We hope this Real Estate Investment Guide will not only assist you in avoiding the pitfalls of manoeuvring through the tax jungle of international real estate investments, but also support you in finding new markets and business opportunities. Should you require any further in-depth information on real estate investments into a particular country, please feel free to contact us or the relevant local contact per - son. WTS Global is always at your service. Best regards, Viktor Sandberg Global Head of Real Estate Service Line [email protected] wts.com 4 5 A. Legal/General Real Estate Investment in 1. Are non-residents entitled to acquire real estate in Albania? Albania Does the acquisition have to be carried out by an Albanian corporation? Under law no. 7980, dated 27 July 1995 “On the Acquisition of Plots”, as amended, foreign individuals/entities may acquire and own land which can be built on, as long as it is proven that they have invested in the land not less than three times its value. The value of the land is determined by the Council of Ministers. Until such investment is made, the foreign individual/entity may use the land under a lease contract. Alternatively, foreign individuals/entities may acquire land by establishing a company under the Albanian law, which as an Albanian legal person can then freely acquire and own any type of immovable property. Other immovable property such as buildings can be freely acquired by foreigners. 2. Which importance does the land register have? The law governing the registration of Local contact land is the recently adopted law no. Alketa Uruçi 111/2018 “On the Cadaster”. According [email protected] to this law, all immovable property must T: +355 4 225 1050 be registered in the cadaster register. www.bogalaw.com This register is open to the public and is administrated by the State Cadaster Global contact Agency. Viktor Sandberg [email protected] The cadaster register is composed of all M: +46 70 441 80 36 www.wts.com property records and cadastral maps that contain the following information on the immovable property: identity of the owner, the boundaries of the property, the date of registration and the relative deed of ownership acquisition, and plans that show the location of property. In addition, any mortgage, easement, usufruct, right to use or any other right connected to or deriving from the immovable property that is transferred to any third party, should be recorded in the property record. Any contract or other instrument eJecting transactions involving an immovable property should be filed with the local directory of the State Cadaster Agency within 30 days of its execution, failure to comply will result in a fine of 10% of the fee for each day of delay to a maximum amount of ALL 300,000. 7 The owner of a property disposes freely the property only after registration of Any subsequent measurement of the tangible and intangible fixed assets after the property with the Cadaster and after receiving the Ownership Certificate. their initial recognition is not considered for tax purposes. 3. When is a foreign investor subject to limited tax liability in Albania? B. Income Tax Non-Albanian resident persons are taxed in Albania only for the Albanian-sourced 1. What are the corporate and the personal income tax rates? income, while tax resident persons are liable for tax on their worldwide income. Are there special tax rates for real estate? Are there any participation exemptions? 4. Are asset deal and share deal possible in Albania? Does a tax-grouping exist? If yes, what are the requirements? What are the main consequences? Corporations conducting business in Albania and having an annual turnover Both asset deal and share deal are possible in Albania. exceeding ALL 14 million are subject to a corporate income tax (profit tax) at a rate of 15%. The rate for corporates having annual turnover between ALL 5 million Asset deal and ALL 14 million is 5% (the tax will be 0% on 1 January 2021). In the case of asset deal, the taxes payable depend on whether the seller is an No profit tax applies for a 10-year period for accommodation structures “Four-Star and individual or an entity registered for profit tax in Albania. Five-Star Hotels, Special Status”, benefiting the special status until December 2024. In case of an individual, the personal income tax at the rate of 15% over the capital No tax-grouping rules exist. gain (sale price minus purchase price) is payable at the moment of registration of the sale contract with the Cadaster. If the seller is an entity, the seller will have to pay Personal income tax deriving from the transfer of ownership over real estate is 15% the tax on transfer of real estate (as mentioned in the answer to question C.1. below ) of the capital gain (sale price minus purchase price). In case of corporations, income but also profit tax (15% over the diFerence between sale price and purchase price). from sale of real estate is considered as ordinary income (and subject to profit tax at 15% rate together with the other income). Share deal 2. What is the tax depreciation period for real estate in Albania? In case of share deal, no tax on transfer of real estate is payable. Are there depreciation categories? Which depreciation method is used? As regards capital gain, the following rules apply: The owner of an asset is entitled to depreciation allowances. If during a taxable period direct and/or indirect ownership of stock capital or voting Buildings, structures and machinery with a long useful life depreciate with the rights of a legal person changes by more than 20% in value or number, and if the declining balance method at a rate of 5%. The start date from which depreciation average annual turnover in the last 3 years of this person exeeds ALL 500 million, is calculated is the first day of the month following the month of purchase. the person is treated as disposing of a proportionate part of all the person’s assets immediately before the change.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A)
    Guidance for Taxpayers on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Q&A) July, 2019 Office of the Mutual Agreement Procedure National Tax Agency, Japan This guidance is to complement the contents of the Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines)*1. This provides clear MAP guidance to taxpayers required by the recommendation of the BEPS Action14 Final Report*2 published in October, 2015. For further information about the Mutual Agreement Procedure, please refer to the Commissioner’s Directive on the Mutual Agreement Procedure (Administrative Guidelines). *1 Amended on May 7, 2019. *2 The BEPS Action14 Final Report: Element 2.1 Countries should publish rules, guidelines and procedures to access and use the MAP and take appropriate measures to make such information available to taxpayers. Countries should ensure that their MAP guidance is clear and easily accessible to the public. Table of Contents 1. The Outline of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) Q1－1 What is a MAP? Q1－2 What is the purpose of MAP? Q1－3 Which provisions of a tax treaty allow a MAP? Q1－4 Please provide information regarding the number of MAP cases? Q1－5 Which countries can Japan’s competent authorities negotiate with on MAP cases? Q1－6 Please give details about the circumstances surrounding MAP around the world. Q1－7 How long does it take to resolve a MAP case after its request is made? Q1－8 What items should taxpayers pay attention to for making a MAP request? 2. MAP Q2－1 Who is eligible to request for MAP assistance? Q2－2 How can a taxpayer request for MAP assistance? Q2－3 Can a taxpayer consult with the NTA before requesting MAP assistance? Q2－4 Is there a deadline for holding a pre-filing consultation? Q2－5 What kind of documents should be prepared for a pre-filing consultation? Q2－6 Please provide the application form for requesting MAP assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation of Partnerships - Legal General Report for the Nordic Tax Research Council´S Annual Meeting on 22 May 2015 in Aarhus
    Nordic Tax J. 2015 2:47–56 Report Open Access Liselotte Madsen Taxation of Partnerships - Legal general report for the Nordic Tax Research Council´s annual meeting on 22 May 2015 in Aarhus DOI 10.1515/ntaxj-2015-0005 though the similar Norwegian word is “utdeling”, and so Received Sep 08, 2015; accepted Sep 18, 2015 on. In English translation, the word “distribution” is used. I hope that it does not provide any linguistic challenges. The term partnership is used to the extent that it is not found necessary to indicate the national name, and ex- 1 Introduction and terminology presses only that it is a transparent business. First, a short review of the company law rules regard- This report has been written on the basis of a number of ing the establishment of partnerships will be carried out, Nordic national reports on the subject: Taxation of part- after which, the tax rules will be reviewed. nerships. The contributions from Denmark, Norway, Swe- den, and Iceland have been incorporated in the report to the best of my ability and by relevance. 2 Company law matters The term "partnership" is a general term for a num- ber of companies that have a common characteristic - First, it is relevant to relate to the company law rules ap- namely that they are not taxable entities, but rather trans- plicable to partnerships. A description of this has been parent for tax purposes. The company type, partnership, deemed important for the understanding of the civil law which is not a separate tax subject, can be found in all rules for partnerships, both in relation to the third parties the Nordic countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshops No. 6/2005 165 the Future of the Corporate Taxation
    √ Oesterreichische Nationalbank Stability and Security. Workshops Proceedings of OeNB Workshops Capital Taxation after EU Enlargement January 21, 2005 No. Eurosystem 6 The Future of the Corporate Income Taxation in the European Union Sijbren Cnossen University of Maastricht A. Introduction The future of capital income taxation in the European Union (EU) hinges importantly on the future of the corporation tax. No doubt, schedular capital (income) taxes on real estate and the earnings of small-businesses will be around for a long time to come, but the base of a comprehensive capital income tax requires the inclusion of corporate earnings, i.e. profits, interest and royalties. Capital income taxation, broadly defined, will wither if the body politic does not want to tax corporate earnings, either deliberately or by ignoring the policy and administrative issues that arise in a globalised capital market. Accordingly, this paper focuses mainly on corporation tax (CT) regimes. The future of the corporation tax starts now. Therefore, Part B surveys and evaluates the actual CT regimes in the EU to see whether they yield any clues about what the future may hold in store. The survey starts with an analysis of corporation-income tax relationships in the Member States centered on the treatment of distributed and retained profits. Subsequently, there is a comparison between nominal tax rates on various forms of capital income (retained profits, dividends, interest) and labor income. This is followed by a review of the most important tax base features, including the use of tax incentives. Finally, there is a discussion of a number of technical aspects that bear on the enforcement of the taxation of corporate earnings.
    [Show full text]
  • The Double Taxation Relief NORWAY Order 1969
    Supplement to the "Trinidad and Tobago Gazette" Vol. 8, No. 130 - 25th December, 1969 GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO. 175 TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, CH. 33 No.1 ORDER MADE BY THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL UNDER SECTION 47(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, AS ENACTED BY SECTION 32 OF THE FINANCE ACT, 1966 THE DOUBLE TAXATION RELIEF (NORWAY) ORDER, 1969 WHEREAS it is provided by subsection (1) of section 47 of the Income Tax Ordinance that if the Governor-General by Order published in the Gazette declares that arrangements specified in the Order have been made with the Government of any country with a view to affording relief from double taxation in relation to income tax and any tax of a similar character imposed by the laws of that country, and that it is expedient that those arrangements shall have effect: And whereas by a Convention dated the 20th day of June, 1969, made between the Government of Trinidad and Tobago and the Government of Norway, arrangements were made inter alia for the avoidance of double taxation: Now, therefore, the Governor-General in pursuance of the said subsection (1) of section 47 of the Income Tax Ordinance is please to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:- 1. This Order may be cited as the Double Taxation Relief (Norway) Order, 1969. 2. It is hereby declared- 1 (a) that the arrangements specified in the Schedule have been made with the Government of Norway; (b) that it is expedient that those arrangements should have effect. SCHEDULE CONVENTION BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND THE GOVERNMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Free: 115.52 KB
    ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK A XECUTIVE D E INSTITUTE Kasumigaseki Bldg. 8F 3-2-5 Kasumigaseki B SUMMARY Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-6008 Japan I Tel: 81 3 3593 5500, Fax: 81 3 3593 5571 SERIES No. S52/01 Email: [email protected] http://www.adbi.org 2001 Tax Conference 5-11 September 2001, Tokyo Executive Summary of Proceedings CONTENTS 2 The governance of tax systems requires governments to Page continue their effort to stamp out corruption and insure Key Messages 1 that the tax systems help the majority and not hurt them in Introduction 3 such endeavors. This is another example of the need for Opening Remarks 3 international cooperation. Taxation in an Interdependent World 4 Japan and International Tax Cooperation 5 3 Tax havens are a genuine concern to all as they erode the Tax Competition Not Necessarily Harmful 5 revenue base. It is however important to understand how E-Commerce and Tax 6 harmful it is and to whom? Who really benefits from tax The Source of Income, Tax Arbitrage and havens? Perhaps this is an area, which deserves detailed Double Tax Agreements 7 research. Transfer Pricing–Advance Pricing Agreements 8 Rationale and Scope for Fiscal Restructuring in At the specific country level, fiscal restructuring and Asia 9 4 Environmental Tax 10 financial sector restructuring are areas where attention Tax Administration and Compliance 11 of national governments as well as donors should go for Electronic Filing of Tax Returns 13 a long-term solution to the ensuing problem from truly Country Experiences with Value Added Tax tax havens.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Taxation in Japan
    Papers on the Local Governance System and its Implementation in Selected Fields in Japan No.10 Local Taxation in Japan Kenichiro HARADA Vice Mayor Komono Town Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) Institute for Comparative Studies in Local Governance (COSLOG) National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) Except where permitted by the Copyright Law for “personal use” or “quotation” purposes, no part of this booklet may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the permission. Any quotation from this booklet requires indication of the source. Contact Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) (The International Information Division) Sogo Hanzomon Building 1-7 Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 102-0083 Japan TEL: 03-5213-1724 FAX: 03-5213-1742 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.clair.or.jp/ Institute for Comparative Studies in Local Governance (COSLOG) National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) 7-22-1 Roppongi, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-8677 Japan TEL: 03-6439-6333 FAX: 03-6439-6010 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www3.grips.ac.jp/~coslog/ Foreword The Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR) and the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) have been working since FY 2005 on a “Project on the overseas dissemination of information on the local governance system of Japan and its operation”. On the basis of the recognition that the dissemination to overseas countries of information on the Japanese local governance system and its operation was insufficient, the objective of this project was defined as the pursuit of comparative studies on local governance by means of compiling in foreign languages materials on the Japanese local governance system and its implementation as well as by accumulating literature and reference materials on local governance in Japan and foreign countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxation and Investment in Norway 2016 Reach, Relevance and Reliability
    Taxation and Investment in Norway 2016 Reach, relevance and reliability A publication of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited Contents 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment 1.2 Currency 1.3 Banking and financing 1.4 Foreign investment 1.5 Tax incentives 1.6 Exchange controls 1.7 Labor environment 2.0 Setting up a business 2.1 Principal forms of business entity 2.2 Regulation of business 2.3 Accounting, filing and auditing filing requirements 3.0 Business taxation 3.1 Overview 3.2 Residence 3.3 Taxable income and rates 3.4 Capital gains taxation 3.5 Double taxation relief 3.6 Anti-avoidance rules 3.7 Administration 3.8 Other taxes on business 4.0 Withholding taxes 4.1 Dividends 4.2 Interest 4.3 Royalties 4.4 Branch remittance tax 4.5 Wage tax/social security contributions 5.0 Indirect taxes 5.1 Value added tax 5.2 Capital tax 5.3 Real estate tax 5.4 Transfer tax 5.5 Stamp duty 5.6 Customs and excise duties 5.7 Environmental taxes 5.8 Other taxes 6.0 Taxes on individuals 6.1 Residence 6.2 Taxable income and rates 6.3 Inheritance and gift tax 6.4 Net wealth tax 6.5 Real property tax 6.6 Social security contributions 6.7 Other taxes 6.8 Compliance 7.0 Deloitte International Tax Source 8.0 Contact us Norway Taxation and Investment 2016 1.0 Investment climate 1.1 Business environment Norway is a constitutional monarchy, with a parliamentary democratic system of government. Powers are allocated among the executive, the legislature (Storting) and the court system.
    [Show full text]
  • Statoil Asa Terms and Conditions of the Dividend Issue Under the Two Year
    ISIN: NO 0010096985 Trading Symbol: STL 26 May 2017 STATOIL ASA TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE DIVIDEND ISSUE UNDER THE TWO YEAR SCRIP DIVIDEND PROGRAMME FOURTH QUARTER 2016 This document sets forth the terms and conditions (the "Terms and Conditions") relating to the subscription of new shares (the "Dividend Shares") of Statoil ASA ("Statoil" or the "Company"), each with a nominal value of NOK 2.50 (the "Dividend Issue") in connection with payment of the dividend of USD 0.2201 (NOK 1.8784) for the fourth quarter 2016 under the two year scrip dividend programme (the "Scrip Dividend Programme") approved by the general meeting of the Company on 11 May 2017. IMPORTANT INFORMATION Shareholders are urged to carefully read the information set forth under Section 15 "Selling and Transfer Restrictions". 1 THE DIVIDEND ISSUE On 11 May 2017, the general meeting of Statoil resolved to distribute a Dividend of USD 0.2201 (NOK 1.8784) per share for the fourth quarter 2016 (the “Dividend”) to the holders of the Company's shares (the "Shares") as of expiry of 10 May 2017 for holders of American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”) on the New York Stock Exchange ("ADR Holders") and 11 May 2017 for shareholders on the Oslo Stock Exchange (together the "Existing Shareholders"), as registered with Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as the depositary for the ADRs and the Company’s shareholder register with the Norwegian Central Securities Depositary (Nw. Verdipapirsentralen) (the "VPS") as of expiry of 15 May 2017 (the "Record Date"), respectively. Existing Shareholders whose shares trade on the Oslo Stock Exchange will receive their Dividend in NOK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Moving to a Territorial Tax System on Profit Repatriations: Evidence from Japan
    DPRIETI Discussion Paper Series 13-E-047 The Effect of Moving to a Territorial Tax System on Profit Repatriations: Evidence from Japan HASEGAWA Makoto University of Michigan KIYOTA Kozo RIETI The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry http://www.rieti.go.jp/en/ RIETI Discussion Paper Series 13-E-047 May 2013 The Effect of Moving to a Territorial Tax System on Profit Repatriations: * Evidence from Japan HASEGAWA Makoto University of Michigan KIYOTA Kozo Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry Abstract The design of international tax policies, including whether and how to tax corporate incomes earned in foreign countries, has received a great deal of attention from policymakers and economists. The United States taxes foreign source income upon repatriation under the worldwide tax system and has long discussed changing the current corporate tax system to a territorial tax system that exempts foreign income from home taxation. Japan had a worldwide tax system similar to that in the United States, but moved to a territorial tax system by introducing a foreign dividend exemption in April 2009. This paper examines the effect of dividend exemption on profit repatriations by Japanese multinationals. We find that while the dividend exemption system stimulated dividend payments by foreign affiliates on average, their responses to dividend exemption were heterogeneous. Foreign affiliates not paying dividends under the worldwide tax system did not start to do so as a result of the legislation. On the other hand, dividend exemption increased dividend repatriations by foreign affiliates that had paid dividends under the worldwide tax system. We also find that more profitable firms paid larger amounts of dividends under the worldwide tax system and increased dividend payments further in the first year of the new exemption system.
    [Show full text]
  • Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-Operation
    Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Off-print of the DAC Journal 2003, Volume 4, No. 3 www.oecd.org Philanthropic Foundations and Development Co-operation Off-Print of the DAC Journal 2003, Volume 4, No. 3 Development Assistance Committee ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: – to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; – to contribute to sound economic expansion in member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and – to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14th December 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Policy Caliph Umar Ibn Khattab
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Economic Policy caliph Umar ibn Khattab Kusnadi, Jamaludin Fakultas Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon 7 July 2018 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/87819/ MPRA Paper No. 87819, posted 11 Jul 2018 15:58 UTC ECONOMIC POLICY Caliph Umar Ibn Khattab Jamaludin Kusnadi EKOS 1 [email protected] Sejarah Pemikiran Ekonomi Islam Dr.H. Aan Jaelani, M.Ag Abstract Umar bin Khattab was a close friend of the Prophet Muhammad that did policies in Islamic economy, especially macroeconomy, and found wisdom way to manage property (country wealth) and made people benefit with three ways, first: take the right way, second: given in accordance with their rights, and third; avoid from bad. It showed that management of Umar bin Khattab was neat in the country took financial management policy, the country will not take people property in wrong way.1 Keywords ombudsmen, diwan, kharaj, public finance, Umar bin Khattab Jel A.11, .00, B11, B31 Background Umar bin Khattab, who earned his first commander of the faithful. At the time of Umar bin Khattab's Muslims are experiencing rapid success and ekomoninya already very advanced as booty or spoils of war is not a form of armor, but land is a vast country the Roman state. Dr.Abdul according to Ibrahim Al-Kaylan (2008)2 Omar bin Khattab confronts the problems of the State in the economy and make it a goal of an independent state. Dr.Mustofa Faydah explains in his book ta'sis Umar bin Khattab (1418H / 1997M)3 said that Zama Umar (13-23H / 634-644M) conquered most countries after the Prophet died.
    [Show full text]
  • Publications 56 Economic Research Local Public Sector in Transition: a Nordic Perspective
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by National Library of Finland DSpace Services Government Institute for Publications 56 Economic Research Local public sector in transition: A Nordic perspective Antti Moisio (Ed.) Publications 56 October 2010 VATT PUBLICATIONS 56 Local public sector in transition: A Nordic perspective Antti Moisio (Ed.) Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus Government Institute for Economic Research Helsinki 2010 ISBN 978-951-561-937-2 (nid.) ISBN 978-951-561-938-9 (PDF) ISSN 0788-4990 (nid.) ISSN 1795-3332 (PDF) VATT Valtion taloudellinen tutkimuskeskus Government Institute for Economic Research Arkadiankatu 7, 00100 Helsinki, Finland Oy Nord Print Ab Helsinki, October 2010 Graphic design: Niilas Nordenswan Authors Jens Blom-Hansen Aarhus University Lars-Erik Borge Norwegian University of Science and Technology Claire Charbit OECD Matz Dahlberg Uppsala University Heikki A. Loikkanen University of Helsinki and VATT Antti Moisio Government Institute for Economic Research (VATT) Lasse Oulasvirta University of Tampere Anwar Shah World Bank Camila Vammalle OECD Preface and acknowledgement This book is intended to serve as a resource for those who want to understand the recent reforms of local government organisation, tasks and funding in Finland, Denmark, Norway and Sweden. A special focus of the book is on Finnish local government and how the present Finnish situation compares with developments in other countries. However, this book also offers a more general view of local government reforms and in the way that fiscal federalism has been affected by the global fiscal crisis. The articles in this book are written by researchers who are all acknowledged academic experts in local public finance and local governance.
    [Show full text]