DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume 27 Number 4 Siecus 35Th Anniversary April/May

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume 27 Number 4 Siecus 35Th Anniversary April/May VOLUME 27 NUMBER 4 SIECUS 35TH ANNIVERSARY APRIL/MAY 1999 SIECUS I ruxfl I 35 YEARS VOL. 27, NO. 4 l APRIL/MAY 1999 Debra W. Haffner, M.P.H. President and CEO Christopher 1. Portelli, J.D. Director of Information Mac Edwards Editor The SIECUS Report is published bimonthly and distributed to SIECUS members, professionals, organizations, government officials, libraries, the media, and the general public.The SIECUS Report publishes work from a variety of disciplines and perspectives about sexuality, including medicine, law, philosophy, business, and the social sciences. Annual SIECUS subscription fees: individual, $65; organization, $135 (includes two subscrip- tions to the SIECUS Reyovt); library, $85. Outside the United States, add $10 a year to these fees (in Canada and Mexico, add $5). The SIECUS Report is available on microfilm from University Microfilms, 300 North Zeeb Road,Ann Arbor, MI 48106. All article, review, advertising, and publication inquiries and submissions should be addressed to: Mac Edwards, Editor SIECUS Report 130 West 42nd Street, Suite 350 NewYork, NY 10036-7802 phone 212/819-9770 fax 212/819-9776 Web Site: www.siecus.org E-mail: [email protected] Opinions expressed in the articles appearing in the SIECUS Report may not reflect the official position of the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. Articles that express differing points of view are published as a contribution to responsible and mean- ingful dialogue regarding issues of significance in the field of sexuality. SIECUS is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Education 3700 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6216 Copyright 0 1999 by the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States, Inc No part of the SIECLJS Report may be reproduced in any form without written permission. Design and layout by Alan Bynett, Inc. Proofreading by E. Bruce Stevenson Printing by Success Printing Library of Congress catalog card number 72-627361 ISSN: 0091-3995 ARTICLES 4 THE FIRST 35YEARS: A HISTORY OF SIECUS Sarah Cunningham, B.A., M.Div., Ph.D. Historian 11 DR. CALDERONE ON SEXUALITY AND SEXUALITY EDUCATION 12 A SIECUS TIMELINE: 1964-1999 14 ANALYSIS OF STATES’ IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ABSTINENCE-ONLY-UNTIL-MARRIAGE EDUCATION PROGRAM Daniel Daley, SIECUS Director of Public Policy and Vivian C. Wong, SIECUS Public Policy Associate ALSO IN THIS ISSUE... FROM THE PRESIDENT SIECUS AT 35 By DebraW Haffner,M.P.H.. 2 FACT SHEET THE NATIONAL COALITION TO SUPPORT COMPREHENSIVE SEXUALITY EDUCATION 19 BIBLIOGRAPHY 35 BOOKS THAT HAVE INFLUENCED s. OUR UNDERSTANDING OF SEXUALITY. 21 VOLUME 27 NUMBER 4 APRIL/MAY 1999 SIECUS REPORl FROM THE PRESIDENT SIECUS AT 35 Debra W. Haffner, M.P.H. r*; $ *: icture a diverse group of professionals meeting at a concept of sexuality, as introduced by Mary Calderone in i Conference on Religion and the Family in 1961. 1964, is now understood to encompass much more than the They include the medical director of Planned Parenthood, biological meaning of sex. Sexuality education has replaced the director of the National Council of Churches of Christ, the term sex education to emphasize its more comprehen- and the leader of the marriage counseling movement in the sive scope. Sexual harassment and date rape now have United States. Together, they talk about the absence of any names. They are no longer something that women have to discussion on sexuality issues at this meeting and in their “put up with” in their working and personal lives. work, and the need for a national organization that focuses The field of sexuality has matured during these past 35 on sexuality issues. years. Since 1964, our work has been greatly enriched and Three years later, they incorporate and name Dr. Mary informed by such researchers, scientists, and educators as Calderone, one of the cofounders, as their first (then William Masters,Virginia Johnson, Helen Singer Kaplan, the unpaid) executive director. Their mission was “to establish Boston Women’s Health Collective, The Alan Guttmacher man’s sexuality as a health entity.. to dignify it Institute, and others. The 35th anniversary bibli- by openness of approach, study, and scientific How fur ography in this issue highlights some of these research designed to lead toward its understand- important contributions to the field. ing and its freedom from exploitation.” In we have Public dialogue about sexuality has prophetic words, Wallace Fulton, the first Board changed dramatically during the past 35 years. president, wrote in the first SIECUS newsletter come! And such change is not just the result of sexolo- that “if the present group had not created it gists talking to each other. In February 1999, [SIECUS], others would have inevitably had to do so.” SIECUS conducted a public poll on our Internet site to ask 1964 was a very different world for people’s sexual the general public who had the greatest impact in bringing rights. Married couples did not have a constitutional right to about a positive change in the way America understands obtain contraception. Abortion was illegal. Sex education, as and affirms sexuality.The top ten, chosen from a list of 100, it was called then, was almost nonexistent. Gays and lesbians are listed in the article on page 3. were labeled as deviant. Sexually explicit materials were only There is now an acceptance of the need for sexuality available in dark stores that “nice” people didn’t enter. The education in schools that would have been undreamed of in “pill” was newly available and Playboy was breaking barriers. the early years of SIECUS. In the late 196Os, such groups as The women’s movement, the youth movement, and the gay the John Birch Society and the Christian Crusade published and lesbian rights movement were all to come. booklets with such titles as Is the School House the Proper How far we have come! Today, 90 percent of all couples Place to Teach Raw Sex? I remember being picketed in the use contraception. Today, almost all teenagers report that 1970s with signs that said “Keep Sex Education Out of they have received some formal instruction in sexuality the Schools.” issues compared to only half of all people who graduated There is now broad-based public and professional con- from high school in the early 1970s,Today, in many places, sensus about the need for sexuality education for children gays and lesbians live openly and proudly in their commu- and youth. In the latest Gallup opinion poll, 87 percent of nities, workplaces, and religious institutions. Today, adults paretts support school-based sexuality education, up from can obtain sexually explicit materials for their personal use 76 percent just ten years ago. More than 115 of the coun- from their local family video stores. Today, more than 90 try’s most mainstream national youth, health, medical, and percent ofAmericans endorse the concept of gender equity religious organizations support sexuality education as mem- in the workplace. bers of the SIECUS-led National Coalition to Support The reality is that Americans think and talk about sex- Sexuality Education. A current list of all Coalition members uality differently now than they did in the mid-1960s. The is on page 19. 2 SIECUS REPORT VOLUME 27, NUMBER 4 But, the need for SIECUS is as great as ever. Since recent murders of Matthew Shepard, Dr. Barnett Slepian, 1990, there has been a steady attack on comprehensive and Billy Jack Gaither are dramatic examples of how tenu- sexuality education. Fewer states (19) now require sexuality ous sexual rights are. education than at the start of this decade. Since SIECUS’ But, there is no question that we are closer to our vision community advocacy project began in 1992, we have docu- of a world where sexuality is affirmed and where all people mented more than 700 controversies in every state over the have the education, services, and rights they need to make content of sexuality education. responsible sexual choices consistent with their own personal The federal abstinence-only-until-marriage program is values. I like to think that our cofounders would be pleased beginning to change the landscape of sexuality education; to visit SIECUS today and learn more about the activities of five states have already adopted this restrictive language into our 20 professional staff in Washington and NewYork. their state laws. The article “Analysis of States’ We are pleased to publish a history of SIECUS and the Implementation of Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage timeline of SIECUS milestones in this special issue of the Education Program” on page 14 provides a snapshot of the SIECUS Report. I am proud and grateful to have been part impact of the first year of the program’s implementation. of SIECUS’ history for the past 11 years, and deeply hon- SIECUS’ work is far from done. Alarming rates of ored to carry out the mission that was begun 35 years ago. I unplanned pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases, HIV, raise an imaginary celebration toast to all of you who have sexual abuse, and other forms of sexual violence plague supported SIECUS and who in your daily work help make America, and indeed, most countries around the globe. The our vision a reality. * . ..**.......................,......... * . ..I _ . ..*........ If. I . _ . ..*...................................,....... * *...e....*...... *.*.... *............. * . * . ..I......... *..* . ..I.. IO INDIVIDUALS TOP SIECUS “PEOPLE ARE TALKING” POLL SIECUS Web site visitors participated in a “People Are The candidate list of 100 people included actors, Talking” poll in February to select 10 individuals from a artists, authors, historians, musicians, writers, columnists, list of 100 who have brought about a positive change in philosophers, playwrights, and leaders in the field of sexu- the way America understands and1 affirms sexuality as a zhzy, among others. natural and healthy part of Me.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tumbling Wall Breaking the Silence About Abortion
    Chapter One The Tumbling Wall Breaking the Silence About Abortion "Abortion is the dread secret of our society," began Lawrence Lader's Abortion,' When the book was published in early 1966, abortion was "the dread secret" that everyone knew. Somewhere between two hundred thousand and 1.5 million women received abortions in the United States each year, with most estimates hovering around one million. Of these, only eight thousand a year were legal. But these figures belie the public perception of abortion. Abortion was pervasive in numbers only; as a news story, as a political issue, and as a matter of public scrutiny, abortion had been shrouded in a cloak of silence for decades. Legal abortion was a cause without a voice. The experiences of the one million women a year who terminated their pregnancies through an underground network of abortionists ranging from back-alley butchers to Park Avenue surgeons were largely unarticulated. Abortion was taboo, and to write about it was a bad career move for a journalist; to speak about it as a politician was at best naive, at worst politically suicidal. In 1966, however, the ice was beginning to melt. "The 'conspiracy of silence' to which Lawrence Lader alludes in his new book is gradually being breached," wrote Edwin Schur in a review of Abortion in The Nation. Abortion was gradually creeping its way into the news. For example, from 1961 to 1964, The New York Times published a total of only forty-six articles pertaining to abortion, the vast majority of which were about criminal trials of abortionists.
    [Show full text]
  • September 4, 1969 Arkansas Baptist State Convention
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine, 1965-1969 Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine 9-4-1969 September 4, 1969 Arkansas Baptist State Convention Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/arbn_65-69 Recommended Citation Arkansas Baptist State Convention, "September 4, 1969" (1969). Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine, 1965-1969. 33. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/arbn_65-69/33 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arkansas Baptist Newsmagazine, 1965-1969 by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul. ..." (Mt. 10:28). Personally Don't be afraid I speaking INI ·. THIS ISSUE: Don't be afraid! STATE BAPTISTS are busy . "getting the church out into the fields where the people are" In these days of nuclear stockpiles, ''pressing as new programs in state missions are begun and the panic button'' has become an overworked ·ex.- old ones are revitalized. A special feature, with pression. pictures, begins on page 10. There are more varieties. of fear t.oday than there are kinds of vegetable_ soup or: - washing MINISTERS PROTEST ''departure from powders, not to mention breakfast foods. the faith" 1n Training Union literature in a let­ A Baptist seminary professor was . so fearful ter to the editor found on page 4. of being found ludicrous that he confessed start,. ing each new day with the prayer, "~ord, help . THIS WEEK'S cover ·shows a drawing of the me not to make a fool of myself today in public.'' Cummins Prison chapel, - under construction, A man· developed such an obsession ov:er the where a .Baptist chaplain will serve.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: Ellen S. More, Ph.D. Date: April 25, 2018 PRESENT POSITION AND ADDRESS: Professor Emeritus, Department of Psychiatry University of Massachusetts Medical School 55 Lake Ave. North Worcester, MA 01655 508 856-7633 E-mail: [email protected] BIOGRAPHICAL: Citizenship: U. S. A. Home Address: 521 Salisbury St. Worcester, MA 01609-1307 EDUCATION: June 1965- May 1968 B.A. magna cum laude, The College at New Paltz Sept 1968- May 1970 M.A., University of Rochester Sept 1970- May 1980 Ph.D., University of Rochester Dissertation: "The New Arminians: John Goodwin and His Coleman Street Congregation in Cromwellian England." POST DOCTORAL EDUCATION Intensive Bioethics Course, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, D.C., June 6-11, 1988. Newberry Library Mini-Institute in Social History, 1982 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: February 2006- Professor, Dept. of Psychiatry, UMass Medical School January 2006- Head, Office of Medical History and Archives Lamar Soutter Library, UMass Medical School, Worcester October 2004- Visiting Professor, Dept. of Psychiatry, UMass Medical School, April 2006 Worcester, MA January 2000- Visiting Curator, National Library of Medicine, “Changing the October, 2003 Face of Medicine: Celebrating America’s Women Physicians” September 2000- Fellow, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study (Bunting-Schlesinger August 2001 Library Fellow), Harvard University September 2000- Professor/with tenure January 2006 Preventive Medicine and Community Health; Member, Institute for the Medical Humanities,
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Sex Education Provides an Essential Founda- Tion for Understanding the Current State of Sex Education in America
    A History of Sex Education in the United States Since 1900 Valerie J. Huber Michael W. Firmin ABSTRACT: We provide a historical perspective toward the current public school practices of American sex education. The primary time frames include the progressive era (1880–1920), intermediate era (1920–1960), the sexual revolution era (1960s and 1970s), and the modern sex education era (1980s to the present). In each period, we highlight key developments that affect educators’ current decision making as public sex education continues to develop and morph in the context of contemporary society. We show that an apt understanding of sex education’s past is critical for making prudent decisions about its future. The historical record of sex education in American public schools is Arelatively short. Developments after 1900 were the emphasis in this study, but a brief examination of events prior to 1900 provided an important foundation. Cultural and moral gatekeepers made sexual experimentation a forbidden activity during early American history, but those gates were forced open by a series of events after the turn of the 20th century. Sex Education in America Before 1900 Little has been written about sex education before 1900 (Pearsall, 2001). Searches within typical academic research vehicles do not provide much in- formation. Traditionally, in early American history, the home was the place where discussions of sex took place, and, even then, the conversations tended to be minimal, usually a mix of practical physiology and moral instruction, grounded in religious standards (Peterson, 1983). Some children would learn about reproduction from watching animals in the barnyard, since much of early American society was agrarian.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sex Education in the U.S
    Current as of November 2016 History of Sex Education in the U.S. The primary goal of sexuality education is the promotion of sexual health (NGTF, 1996). In 1975, the World Health Organization (WHO) offered this definition of sexual health: Sexual health is the integration of the somatic, emotional, intellectual, and social aspects of sexual being, in ways that are positively enriching and that enhance personality, communication, and love. Fundamental to this concept are the right to sexual information and the right to pleasure. The concept of sexual health includes three basic elements: 1. a capacity to enjoy and control sexual and reproductive behavior in accordance with a social and personal ethic; 2. freedom from fear, shame, guilt, false beliefs, and other psychological factors inhibiting sexual response and impairing sexual relationship; and 3. freedom from organic disorders, diseases, and deficiencies that interfere with sexual and reproductive functions. Thus the notion of sexual health implies a positive approach to human sexuality, and the purpose of sexual health care should be the enhancement of life and personal relationships and not merely counseling and care related to procreation or sexually transmitted diseases (WHO, 1975). WHO’s early definition is at the core of our understanding of sexual health today and is a departure from prevailing notions about sexual health — and sex education — that predominated in the 19th and 20th centuries. Until the 1960s and 1970s, the goals of social hygiene and moral purity activists eclipsed broader sexual health concerns in the public health arena. Their narrow goals were to prevent sexually transmitted infections, stamp out masturbation and prostitution, and limit sexual expression to marriage (Elia, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Instruction of Eros: a Content Analysis of Sex Education Texts
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2016 The nsI truction of Eros: A Content Analysis of Sex Education Texts Nicholas Ensley Mitchell Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Mitchell, Nicholas Ensley, "The nI struction of Eros: A Content Analysis of Sex Education Texts" (2016). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 2316. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/2316 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE INTSRUCTION OF EROS: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF SEX EDUCATION TEXTS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Education by Nicholas Ensley Mitchell B.A., Louisiana State University, 2005 M.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 Ed.S., Louisiana State University, 2015 August 2016 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... v Chapter 1: Introduction ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sexuality Education Beliefs: an Emerging Grounded Theory
    SEXUALITY EDUCATION BELIEFS: AN EMERGING GROUNDED THEORY BEGINNING WITH PLANNED PARENTHOOD AND THE CATHOLIC CHURCH By MARK HAROLD SELLE A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY College of Education MAY 2004 © Copyright by MARK HAROLD SELLE, 2004 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by MARK HAROLD SELLE, 2004 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of MARK HAROLD SELLE find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. Chair ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I owe debts of gratitude that I cannot repay to so many who have helped so much with this dissertation. First, I owe a tremendous debt of gratitude to Don Reed whose experience, scholarship, flexibility, warmth, kindness, and belief in my ability to “produce gold,” has helped shape my work. I also want to thank Gail Furman whose high expectations, exacting standards, skillful teaching, and insightful feedback have pushed me to heights beyond my original expectations. I also acknowledge the help Dennis Ray provided in launching me on the road to scholarship. Without his vision for the field-based superintendent program and his energy in making it a reality, I would not have pursued my doctoral degree through Washington State University. He gave me most of the foundation I needed first to become a superintendent and later a scholar. Finally, I want to thank Mike Trevisan for filling in at the last minute and providing valuable insight and feedback as I approached the conclusion of my doctoral program.
    [Show full text]
  • World Centers38. Additionally, GSGNY Featured39 Member Participationas a WAGGGS Delegate at the United Nations RIO+20 Conferenc
    Pro-Life Concerns: Girl Scouts of Greater New York, Girl Scouts USA, WAGGGS Significant pro-life concerns exist about the Girl Scouts at all levels of the organization: local (Girl Scouts of Greater New York – GSGNY), national (Girl Scouts USA – GSUSA) and international (World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts – WAGGGS). GSGNY, GSUSA and WAGGGS each collaborate with, support and promote organizations and individuals that advocate for abortion rights for all women, including adolescent girls. Far from being an autonomous entity, GSGNY is inextricably intertwined with and supports GSUSA and WAGGGS. Girls of GSGNY are counted in GSUSA1 and WAGGGS2 membership totals. Each individual girl’s membership triggers financial contributions to GSUSA3 and WAGGGS4. All girls who purchase uniforms, curriculum books and other Girl Scout materials provide additional funding to GSUSA through licensing fees attached to all trademarked products. Girls also fund GSGNY and GSUSA activities with money raised through Girl Scout cookies sales. While the Girl Scouts claim that all cookie revenues stay within the local council, it is important to note that GSUSA receives millions of dollars every year from the licensing fees that are part of the cookie production costs5. GSUSA is the largest member organization6 of WAGGGS, making up a third2 of its 10 million members worldwide and paying approximately 1.5 million dollars annually to WAGGGS based on the number of registered GSUSA members4. Through its resources7, non-formal education programs8 and participation in international seminars, events and United Nations conferences9, WAGGGS promotes, specifically on behalf of its 10 million members10, youth sexual and reproductive/abortion rights11.
    [Show full text]
  • An Historical Perspective on the Effectiveness of School-Related Programs in the Prevention of Teen Pregnancy
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2002 If not you, then who? : an historical perspective on the effectiveness of school-related programs in the prevention of teen pregnancy Linda Ingram Shoemaker University of Tennessee Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Recommended Citation Shoemaker, Linda Ingram, "If not you, then who? : an historical perspective on the effectiveness of school- related programs in the prevention of teen pregnancy. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2002. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/6308 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Linda Ingram Shoemaker entitled "If not you, then who? : an historical perspective on the effectiveness of school-related programs in the prevention of teen pregnancy." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Education. Thomas N. Turner, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Lester Knight, Bruce Wheeler, George Harris Jr. Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Linda Ingram Shoemaker entitled "If Not You, Then Who? An Historical Perspective On The Effectiveness Of School-Related Programs In the Prevention Of Teen Pregnancy." I have examined the final paper copy of this dissertation for form and content.
    [Show full text]
  • Event Program Here
    27th Anniversary Women’s International Center Living Legacy Awards May 5 2012 Women’s International Center Living Legacy Awards Welcome! Honoring, Encouraging and Educatng Women for More tan a Quartr Century... Since its founding in 1982, Women’s Intrnatonal Centr (WIC) has demanded excelence of itself and al tose affiliatd wit te organizaton. Beginning in 1984, WIC has publicly honored excelence, accomplishment, philantropy and humanitarianism trough te Living Legacy Awards. From tat glorious beginning t tday, over two hundred of te world’s exceptonal contibutrs have acceptd te Living Legacy Award. Te Award has been presentd t presidents, heads of stat, first ladies, educatrs, film and stage actrs, scientsts, atlets, business and military leaders, politcal personalites, and oter remarkable individuals and organizatons contibutng t te beterment of oters. Please join us tday Saturday May 5, 2012, in celebratng te accomplishments of tis year’s Living Legacy Award Honorees, in support of our educatonal scholarship fnds. We tank te Crowne Plaza Hanalei and teir Supportve Team. Women’s Intrnatonal Centr (501c3) A non-profit service and educaton foundaton Fed Tax ID 95-3806872 CA non-profit #D113-1510 PO Box 669 Rancho Santa Fe, CA 92067-0669 Phone & Fax: 858 759 3567 websit www.wic.org Gloria: [email protected] (please cc [email protected] ) CEO: [email protected] CFO: [email protected] Cover Photos: Living Legacy Honorees Top: Lucy C Lin, Ashley Gardner, Mary B. Maschal Tribute, Velina Hasu Houston, Ph.D., Mary Lyons Ph.D., Chairman Heng-Tzu Hsu, Thomas Del Ruth, ASC, Patricia West Del Ruth, David Straus Middle: Mary Cain Youngflesh, June Foray WIC Leadership: Gloria Lane President, Bridget McDonald CEO, Sally B.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 20 (2013-2014) Issue 1 William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law: 2013 Special Issue: Reproductive Article 7 Justice December 2013 Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium Sybil Shainwald Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Gender Commons Repository Citation Sybil Shainwald, Reproductive Injustice in the New Millennium, 20 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 123 (2013), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/vol20/iss1/7 Copyright c 2013 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl REPRODUCTIVE INJUSTICE IN THE NEW MILLENNIUM SYBIL SHAINWALD* INTRODUCTION I. COMMON LAW, THE EARLY STATUTES, AND THE EMBERS OF REFORM A. Legal Abortions (c. 1250–1803) B. Abortion Becomes a Crime: The Birth of Anti-Abortion Legislation (1803–1900) C. Abortion is Illegal (1900–1960) II. THE TIDE CHANGES A. The Liberalization Movement (1960–1973) B. The Decision in Roe and its Aftermath (1973–1982) C. Twenty-Five Years of Legal Abortions (1982–2007) III. A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF RECENT STATE RESTRICTIONS ON ABORTION RIGHTS CONCLUSION INTRODUCTION Recent attempts to curb abortion rights through enactment of new, restrictive regulations have sparked fresh debate, and the need to learn from history, rather than be “condemned to repeat it.”1 Forty- three new abortion restrictions were passed by nineteen states in 2012.2 The previous year, a staggering ninety-two restrictions were * Sybil Shainwald graduated from the College of William & Mary (B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jurisprudence of Privacy in a Splintered Supreme Court, 75 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 75 Article 8 Issue 4 Summer 1992 The urJ isprudence of Privacy in a Splintered Supreme Court David M. Smolin Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation David M. Smolin, The Jurisprudence of Privacy in a Splintered Supreme Court, 75 Marq. L. Rev. 975 (1992). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol75/iss4/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ESSAY THE JURISPRUDENCE OF PRIVACY IN A SPLINTERED SUPREME COURT DAVID M. SMOLIN* The United States Supreme Court's dramatic decision in Planned Parenthoodv. Casey' underscores and exacerbates deep divisions within the Court and the nation regarding abortion, implied fundamental rights, and the role of the judiciary in a constitutional republic. Indeed, the opposition and controversy engendered by Roe v. Wade2 and efforts to overrule Roe were a major theme of the opinions. The joint opinion of Justices Kennedy, O'Connor, and Souter referred six times to the controversy created by Roe.' In the end, the joint opinion relied upon this controversy as a reason for reaffirming the "central holding" of Roe.4 Justice Scalia's dissent, on behalf of all four dissenters, underscored Roe's extreme divisiveness by repeatedly comparing both Roe and the Casey joint opinion to Dred Scott v.
    [Show full text]