DOCSLIB.ORG

Vineyard Wind I - Vineyard Wind/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, Selling Power to MA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vineyard Wind I - Vineyard Wind/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, Selling Power to MA Michelle Bachman, NEFMC staff NEFMC Meeting September 26, 2019 Gloucester, MA Outline 1. Scale and scope of offshore wind development 2. Individual wind energy project updates 3. Regional research updates 4. RODA update 5. Coast Guard guidance, PARS update September 26, 2019 2 1. BOEM updates Working on outlining an expanded approach to cumulative impacts analysis for use in VW SEIS Will apply methods to other wind energy EIS documents Leasing – nothing new since June NY Bight wind energy area announcement still pending There are additional call areas in South Atlantic as well Various SAPs and COPs in review phase (project updates) Gulf of Maine wind energy GOM development would be with floating turbines BOEM finalizing list of invitees to GOM taskforce Does the Council want to engage with the taskforce in some capacity? September 26, 2019 3 State procurement updates MA RFP in progress – applicants State Goal include Bay State Wind, Mayflower Wind, Vineyard MA 3,200 Wind; selections due Nov 8 RI 1,000 CT RFP in progress – looking for CT 2,300 (previously 300) at least 400 MW; bids due NY 9,000 September 30, announcement November NJ 3,500 MD 1,568 (previously NY awards to Equinor (816 MW) 368) and Ørsted (880 MW) in late July VA Sept 2019 EO 2,500 NJ award to Ørsted in late June MW project by 2026 (1,100 MW) TOTALS 20,568 + 2,500 VA announcement Sept 19 September 26, 2019 4 Coordinated transmission General approach now is to combine generation and transmission, which is baked into some state’s RFPs, but can take a transmission ‘backbone’ approach as well BOEM published an RFCI on NY/NJ transmission in June in response to unsolicited ROW request from Anbaric Council submitted comments Anbaric Development Partners, who submitted the ROW request for NY/NJ, is working on a similar submission for Southern New England Anbaric met with Habitat Committee on August 29 September 26, 2019 5 2. Project updates – Massachusetts WEA Vineyard Wind I - Vineyard Wind/Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners, selling power to MA. BOEM has delayed EIS in order to conduct an expanded cumulative impacts analysis – SEIS expected late this year/early 2020 – will include comment period, public meetings. Vineyard Wind II – remainder of lease area 501; bidding for MA RFP, already have SAP for that lease, additional surveys being conducted; COP forthcoming Bay State – Ørsted project, also bidding for MA RFP. COP submitted. NOI likely early next year. Mayflower Wind – Shell and EDP Renewables, also bidding for MA RFP. BOEM is processing the SAP; COP expected next year. September 26, 2019 6 Updates – MA and MA/RI WEAs Equinor project (MA) – Lease area 520, SAP early next year Liberty Wind (MA) – Vineyard Wind project, lease area 522, SAP late winter/early spring, COP 2020 South Fork (MA/RI) – Ørsted project, selling power to NY. DEIS late this year or early next year. Revolution Wind (MA/RI) – Ørsted project, selling power to RI/CT. BOEM expected to receive COP by the end of the year. Sunrise Wind (MA/RI) – Ørsted, Eversource, Con Edison project selling power to NY. COP anticipated summer of 2020. September 26, 2019 Updates – NY, NJ, DE, MD, VA WEAs Empire Wind (NY) – Equinor project, 816 MW, OREC agreement with NY; BOEM expected to receive COP by end of 2019 Ocean Wind (NJ) - Ørsted project, BOEM received COP in August and is reviewing for completeness. NOI end of this year or early next year. Skipjack (DE) – Ørsted project, BOEM received COP in April US Wind (MD) –BOEM expects to receive COP by the end of the year Dominion Energy (VA) – possible 220 turbine project in early stages; related test turbine project in partnership with Ørsted. COP possibly 2022. September 26, 2019 8 3. Regional research updates NYSERDA grant awards in early August NREL with RODA and others – Collaborative Development of Strategies and Tools to Address Commercial Fishing RODA – Creation of a “Knowledge Trust” for Effective Inclusion of Fishermen’s Knowledge in Offshore Wind Energy Decision Making Biodiversity Research Institute – Multi-Scale Relationships Between Marine Predators and Forage Fish Ecology and Environment – Environmental and Fisheries Research for Offshore Wind USFWS – Development of Monitoring Protocols for Nanotag Studies at Offshore Wind Farms September 26, 2019 9 Responsible Offshore Science Alliance In-person meeting July 30 in Philadelphia, final framework late August NEFMC seat on Executive Council; also expect to be involved with subcommittees (area/topic based working groups) Executive Director job Images: RODA posting coming in October https://rodafisheries.org/portfolio/responsible-offshore-science-alliance/ September 26, 2019 10 Southern New England monitoring RFP RFP for Fisheries monitoring in relation to SNE: https://www.masscec.com/request-proposals-pilot-studies- regional-fisheries-monitoring Up to $1 million from BOEM, MassCEC and RI DEM Within/directly relevant to the region from Nantucket Shoals and the Great South Channel extending southwestward to Long Island. Proposals are invited for studies within three topic areas: Fishery resource studies; Seafloor habitat studies; or Technical studies on how to maximize compatibility of offshore wind and fishing. Due October 17, 2019. Contact Nils Bolgen, 617-315-9311 or [email protected]. September 26, 2019 11 BOEM research projects Recently awarded socioeconomic study on surfclam/ocean quahog fishery potential responses to wind farms (Rutgers, U. Southern Mississippi, ODU, VIMS) Recently awarded “Using autonomous vehicles to map distribution and habitat use of soniferous fish, with a focus on Atlantic cod spawning aggregations, on Cox’s ledge" https://www.boem.gov/AT-19-08/ to NEFSC Will be awarding hydrodynamic modeling contract soon How does installation of wind farms in SNE change ocean currents and particle movement? BOEM is interested in feedback regarding focus species for particle tracking Annual solicitation of study ideas for Environmental Studies Program later this fall September 26, 2019 12 4. Responsible Offshore Development Alliance RODA is growing – new members from west coast; interest in sharing lessons learned and expertise Joint Industry Task Force with wind developers – July 2019 TORs NYSERDA grants awarded in August Continued engagement on transit issues in SNE and NY Bight Participated in Cape May hearing of House Sub-Committee on Energy and Mineral Resources September 26, 2019 13 5. Coast Guard guidance and studies Navigation and Vessel Inspection Circular No. 01-19: Guidance on the Coast Guard’s Roles and Responsibilities for Offshore Renewable Energy Installations Identifies information used by USCG to evaluate impacts of OREIs on CG missions, including safety, traditional uses of waterways, etc. Includes guidance for: USCG roles and responsibilities Navigational Safety Risk Assessments Marine Spatial Planning MARIPARS and ACPARS studies in progress September 26, 2019 14.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Market Report
    US OFFSHORE WIND MARKET UPDATE & INSIGHTS US OFFSHORE WIND CAPACITY GENERATION The US Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management (BOEM), has auctioned 16 US offshore wind energy areas (WEAs) designated in federal waters for offshore wind development. Each area has been leased to a qualified offshore wind developer. The ar- eas are located along the East Coast from North Carolina to Massachusetts and represent a total potential capacity of 21,000 Megawatts (MWs) of offshore wind power generation. HISTORY OF BOEM AUCTIONS AND LEASES YEAR LEASE # LESSEE STATE ACREAGE BID MW* NEXT 2012 0482 GSOE I DE 70,098 NA NA SAP *Reading volumes, some earlier estimates 2013 0486 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 97,498 $3,838,288 3400 TTL COP of capacity likely used 2013 0487 Deepwater Wind NE RI/MA 67,252 $3,838,288 3400 TTL FDR different calculations. 2013 0483 VA Electric & Power Co. VA 112,799 $1,600,000 2000 COP In all cases, capacity 2014 0490 US Wind MD 79,707 $8,701,098 1450 COP calculations should be considered estimates. 2015 0501 Vineyard Wind MA 166,886 $166,886 See Below FDR 2015 0500 Bay State Wind MA 187,523 $281,285 2000 TTL COP 2016 0498 Ocean Wind NJ 160,480 $880,715 See Below COP 2016 0499 EDFR Development NJ 183,353 $1,006,240 3400 TTL SAP 2017 0512 Equinor Wind US NY 79,350 $42,469,725 1000 COP 2017 0508 Avangrid Renewables NC 122,405 $9,066,650 1486 SAP 2018 0519 Skipjack Offshore Energy DE 26,332 Assigned NA SAP 2018 0520 Equinor Wind US MA 128,811 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0521 Mayflower Wind Energy MA 127,388 $135,000,000 1300 EXEC 2018 0522 Vineyard Wind MA 132,370 $135,000,000 1500 EXEC EXEC—Lease Execution SAP—Site Assessment Plan COP—Construction & Operations Plan FDR—Facility Design Report @offshorewindus / BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND / offshorewindus.org 1 STATE 2018 2019 MARKET GROWTH The US Offshore Wind market currently stands VIRGINIA 12 12 at 16,970 MWs and is a subset of the total US MARYLAND 366 366 potential generation capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Stafftop Challenge for New US Sector
    Subsea Cable Solutions for offshore wind The Offshore Extensive experience in Wind Consultants complete projects owcltd.com 21 August 2020 @IPF20 LIVESTREAM Equinor puts floating TRENDING ON wind on its project menu Equinor is looking at floating wind Staff top challenge projects as part of its expansion in the US, IPF20 Livestream heard. p2 Vineyard and Mayflower Wind agree staging port leases Vineyard and Mayflower Wind have for new US sector signed lease agreements to use the The US offshore wind industry New Bedford Marine Commerce is primed to deliver on its Terminal as their primary staging and multi-gigawatt promise deployment base. despite confidence being Click here knocked by permitting delays, IPF20 Livestream heard. HOME ADVANTAGE (clockwise Philippe Kavafyan, CEO Orsted secures blessing to from top left): Martin Hansen of turbine manufacturer deploy Haliade-X at Skipjack of Siemens Gamesa, Orsted’s Grant van Wyngaarden, Matt MHI Vestas, told delegates The Maryland Public Service Sellers of Kiewit and sourcing on Thursday the necessary Commission has approved Orsted’s manager Senthil Baskaran elements are there for the turbine selection for its Skipjack wind Screengrab: Business Network for Offshore Wind sector to succeed. farm off the coast of Delaware. Consenting delays, caused BULLISH: Business Network for Offshore Wind CEO Liz Click here Secondary steel key to by the Bureau of Ocean Burdock and MHI Vestas chief Philippe Kavafyan Screengrab: reNEWS Orsted’s local content Energy Management’s Orsted is aiming to deliver significant decision last year to likely to collaborate, including involved if US developers Consortium unveils NY offshore local content levels across its near undertake a cumulative study turbine suppliers, in order to decide to use the next wind port upgrade 3GW US offshore wind portfolio by of all proposed east coast be able to access people with generation of turbines, A New York consortium has unveiled bringing tier two and three suppliers projects, have “calmed down” the required skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7
    Offshore Wind Summit September 25, 30, and October 7, 2020 National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & The Embassy of Denmark 1 Introductory Remarks Jessica Rackley, Energy & Environment Program Director, NGA Center for Best Practices Michael Guldbrandtsen, Counselor, Embassy of Denmark Thank You to our Sponsors States with Clean Energy Goals Source: NGA, 2020 Offshore Wind Technical Potential Source: NREL, 2016 Offshore Wind Energy Resource Assessment for the United States Today’s Virtual Meeting: Zoom Controls The Zoom menu bar appears at the If you don’t see the menu bar, move your bottom of the Zoom window once the meeting begins. mouse slightly and the bar will appear. Chat your questions Introductory Remarks Michael Guldbrandtsen Counselor Embassy of Denmark Welcome Remarks Tim Blute Director NGA Center for Best Practices Introduction to the Day – Offshore Wind Update Thomas Brostrøm CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Summit Thomas Brostrøm, CEO Ørsted North America, Offshore Offshore Wind Update September 25, 2020 Ranked most sustainable company in the world 2 Significant transformation of Ørsted over the past decade 1 Note 1: Figures taken from Ørsted’s Annual Report 2019. Excluding Radius (power distribution business which was divested during 2019) Note 2: ROCE target for 2019-2025 3 Note 3: International share calculated based on Group EBITDA excl. divestments and miscellaneous un-allocated costs totalling 16 DKKbn The first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – We will become carbon neutral by 2025. – This will make Ørsted the first major energy company to reach net-zero emissions in its energy generation – far ahead of science-based decarbonization targets for limiting global warming to 1.5°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceived Risk and Response to the Wind Turbine Ice Throw
    PERCEIVED RISK AND RESPONSE TO THE WIND TURBINE ICE THROW HAZARD: COMPARING COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDERS AND OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL IN TWO REGIONS OF TEXAS by Greg Klaus, B.S., M.A.G. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a major in Environmental Geography May 2017 Committee Members: Denise Blanchard-Boehm, Chair Richard Dixon Richard Earl Todd Moore COPYRIGHT by Greg Klaus 2017 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgment. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Greg Klaus, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. DEDICATION The author would like to dedicate this dissertation to the men and women who work in the wind energy industry who at times put themselves in harm’s way in order to provide for their families and also supply this great nation with a clean, renewable source of electricity. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author would like to thank his committee chair Dr. Denise Blanchard for all of her support and guidance throughout the dissertation process; as well as thank committee members Dr. Richard Dixon, Dr. Richard Earl, and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Market Report & Insights 2020
    RAMPION OFFSHORE WIND FARM — COURTESY OF ATKINS THE BUSINESS NETWORK FOR OFFSHORE WIND U.S. OFFSHORE WIND MARKET REPORT & INSIGHTS 2020 MEMBERS ONLY The Business Network for Offshore Wind’s2020 U.S. Offshore Wind Market and Insights offers an analysis of federal and state government activity to better understand how it may affect your business planning and the industry holistically. The federal government has turned its attention to the burgeoning industry to offer more regulation. Congress and federal agencies beyond the Department of Interior’s Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management and U.S. Department of Energy are now affecting how the offshore wind industry will operate into the future. This report also discusses how some of the challenges facing offshore wind are being addressed. The health and safety of workers – whether onshore or offshore – are a paramount tenet within the industry. Particular- ly at this time, the offshore industry remains proactive in its response to the coronavirus epidemic, having put in place telework directives, eliminating unnecessary travel, and following government guidelines. As a result of these protocols, Europe has reported minimal disruptions to the supply chains and the 15 offshore wind projects in the U.S., remain in the planning and development stages. It is too soon to know exactly how the global COVID-19 epidemic disruption will affect the U.S. offshore wind in- dustry. Our main concern centers around the economic hardship a long-term shutdown and recession would place on secondary and tertiary U.S. suppliers. It is important to point out, however, that there is almost 10GWs of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Energy Jobs in Texas
    Advanced Energy Jobs In Texas Prepared by BW Research Partnership May 2016 Table of Contents What is Advanced Energy? ............................1 About .............................................................2 Highlights .......................................................3 Introduction ....................................................5 Methodology ..................................................7 Industry Overview ............................................. 9 Segment-by-Segment Results .......................13 Energy Efficiency ......................................................... 13 Advanced Electricity Generation ................................ 15 Advanced Fuels .......................................................... 17 Advanced Transportation ........................................... 18 Advanced Grid ............................................................ 19 Market Compostition ...................................21 Value Chain ................................................................. 21 Energy Workfoce ........................................................ 21 Firm Size ..................................................................... 23 Employer Hiring Experience ....................................... 23 Customers and Vendors ...............................25 Revenue Streams ..........................................26 What is Advanced Energy? Advanced energy is a broad range of technologies, els, and nuclear power plants are all examples of products, and services that constitute the
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities
    Offshore Wind Energy Challenges and Opportunities Fishery Management Council Coordinating Committee May 18, 2021 Brian Hooker | Office of Renewable Energy Programs Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Energy OCS Lands Act: "… vital national resource … expeditious and orderly development … environmental safeguards" Energy Policy Act of 2005: "… energy from sources other than oil and gas …" Alaska OCS Pacific OCS Gulf of Mexico OCS Atlantic OCS 2 Biden Administration Offshore Wind Energy Goals o March 29, 2021 the White House issued a “whole-of-government approach” to offshore wind energy development including: o Establishing a Target of Employing Tens of Thousands of Workers to Deploy 30 Gigawatts (30,000 megawatts) of Offshore Wind by 2030 (BOEM). o Partnering with Industry on Data- Sharing (NOAA). o Studying Offshore Wind Impacts. (NOAA). 3 Renewable Energy Program by the Numbers Competitive Lease Sales Completed: 8 Active Commercial Offshore Leases: 17 Site Assessment Plans (SAPs) Approved: 11 General Activities & Research Plans Approved: 2 Construction and Operations Plans (COPs): • Under Review 14 • Anticipated within next 12 months 2 Regulatory Guidance: 11 Leasing Under Consideration: 7 Steel in the Water: 2020 4 Atlantic OCS Renewable Energy: “Projects in the Pipeline” Project Company 2020 Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Pilot South Fork Vineyard Wind I Revolution Wind Skipjack Windfarm Empire Wind Bay State Wind U.S. Wind Sunrise Wind Ocean Wind Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind Commercial Park City Wind Mayflower Wind Atlantic Shores Kitty Hawk 2030 OCS-A 0522 5 Pacific OCS Renewable Energy State Project Nominations California Humboldt Call Area 10 California Morro Bay Call Area 11 California Diablo Canyon Call Area 11 Hawaii Oahu North Call Area 2 Hawaii Oahu South Call Area 3 6 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • May Flower Site Assessment Plan for Lease OCS-A 0521
    SAP Mayflower Wind Lease OCS-A 0521 Site Assessment Plan July 29, 2019 For Public Release SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN Mayflower Wind Lease OCS – A 0521 Massachusetts Offshore Wind Energy Area SUBMITTED TO: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy U.S. Department of the Interior 45600 Woodland Road, VAM-OREP Sterling, Virginia 20166 Office 703-787-1577 Fax 703-787-1708 Attn: Jeff Browning, Mayflower Project Coordinator PREPARED FOR: Mayflower Wind Energy LLC 281 Albany Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 PREPARED BY: ESS Group, Inc. 10 Hemingway Drive, 2nd Floor East Providence, Rhode Island 02915 ESS Project No. M394-000.05 July 29, 2019 © 2019 ESS Group, Inc. – This document or any part may not be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, or mechanical, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording without the express written consent of ESS Group, Inc. All rights reserved. Mayflower Wind Lease OCS-A 0521 Site Assessment Plan July 29, 2019 For Public Release TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Information (30 CFR § 585.610(a)) ...................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Contact Information (§ 585.610(a)(1)) .................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Site Assessment Concept (§ 585.610(a)(2)) .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report: Executive Summary
    2018 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2018 Offshore Wind Technologies Market Report Primary Authors Walter Musial, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Philipp Beiter, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Paul Spitsen, U.S. Department of Energy Jake Nunemaker, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Vahan Gevorgian, National Renewable Energy Laboratory Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 2 U.S. Offshore Wind Energy Market−Key Findings ............................................................................... 2 Global Offshore Wind Energy Market−Key Findings ........................................................................... 6 Offshore Wind Energy Technology Trends−Key Findings.................................................................... 6 Offshore Wind Energy Cost and Price Trends−Key Findings ............................................................... 7 Future Outlook ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Primary Database Sources ............................................................................................................................... 9 References .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 i | 2018 Offshore Wind Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Turbine Radar Interference Mitigation (WTRIM) Webinar #2 of a Series of Technical Interchange Meetings (Tims)
    Offshore Wind Turbine Radar Interference Mitigation (WTRIM) Webinar #2 of a Series of Technical Interchange Meetings (TIMs) Patrick Gilman, DOE Wind Energy Technologies Office May 18, 2020 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY 1 OSW Turbine Radar Interference Mitigation Webinar Series Objective – Building relationships between key industry stakeholders and federal agencies – Sharing perspectives on potential impacts of wind turbine induced radar interference on critical radar missions and offshore wind development – Identifying research and development (R&D) needs to address these impacts Webinar attendees will – Achieve a better understanding of agency perspectives on potential impacts of offshore wind on radar missions and industry perspectives on offshore wind development – Hear about government and industry-led wind-radar interference research, including potential impacts of offshore wind on radar missions and technical mitigation options – Share perspectives on the strengths and weaknesses of the current state of knowledge of potential technical impacts and mitigations – Help identify research needs for offshore wind-radar mitigation and assist in identifying a pathway forward for future government-industry collaboration – Network with professionals representing domestic and European offshore wind developers, OEMs, radar vendors, the WTRIM Working Group, and technical radar experts. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY 2 Agenda Monday, May 18, 2020 11:00 a.m. Welcome, Meeting Objectives Speaker: Patrick Gilman | U.S. Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office (WETO) 11:10 a.m. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management: Offshore Wind Project Review and Approval Process in the U.S. Jim Bennett | Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) 11:25 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • And Doubly-Fed Induction Generator- Based Wind Farms
    SIMULTANEOUS MITIGATION OF SUBSYNCHRONOUS RESONANCE AND SUBSYNCHRONOUS INTERACTION USING FULL-SCALE FREQUENCY CONVERTER- AND DOUBLY-FED INDUCTION GENERATOR- BASED WIND FARMS A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Science In the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan By Xuan Gao © Copyright Xuan Gao, May 2014. All rights reserved PERMISSION TO USE I agree that the Library, University of Saskatchewan, may make this thesis freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis for scholarly purpose may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised the thesis work recorded herein or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which the thesis work was done. It is understood that due recognition will be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any use of the material in this thesis. Copying or publication or any other use of this thesis for financial gain without approval by the University of Saskatchewan and my written permission is prohibited. Request for permission to copy or to make any other use of the material in this thesis in whole or part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Saskatchewan 57 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5A9 Canada i ABSTRACT Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) is one of the major obstacles for the wide spread of high degrees (60% and higher) of series capacitor compensation.
    [Show full text]