Disputed Inquiry Clears Bubble-Fusion Engineer

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disputed Inquiry Clears Bubble-Fusion Engineer NEWS NATURE|Vol 445|15 February 2007 Disputed inquiry clears bubble-fusion engineer An inquiry has exonerated nuclear engineer several researchers worried that Taleyarkhan’s Rusi Taleyarkhan of misconduct with respect work may be fraudulent, and he wrote to Purdue to allegations made internally at Purdue Uni- about his concerns in June 2006. These include versity in West Lafayette, Indiana, officials the apparent duplication of data between announced last week. But the announcement reports of supposedly independent experi- may raise more questions than it answers: ments4 (first raised by Nature), and a report5 researchers in the field have criticized the uni- that the spectrum of neutrons that Taleyarkhan versity for failing to say whether the inquiry claims to have detected from bubble fusion considered their concerns that the work may exactly matches that of a standard radioactive be fraudulent. source called californium. Taleyarkhan has Taleyarkhan claims to be able to produce since replied that when he measures neutrons fusion by collapsing bubbles in deuterated emitted by californium in his lab, he finds some- liquids. His work promised to improve pros- thing quite unlike what he sees from his fusion pects for developing a clean source of energy, experiments6. But a recent preprint points out but independent scientists have not been able that Taleyarkhan omitted some of the original to replicate the result. The work had been sub- spectral data in his reply, and that the full data ject to several internal allegations of miscon- set still looks like californium7. duct, including the fact that Taleyarkhan cited The university never responded to Suslick’s a paper by his student and postdoc as “inde- concerns. Peter Dunn, Purdue’s associate vice- pendent” confirmation of his findings1,2. president for research, told Nature that he Purdue announced on 7 February that “the believes the university followed its procedures. committee determined that the evidence does He declined to comment on why he never not support the allegations of research miscon- replied to Suslick, or on whether evidence duct and that no further investigation of the related to Suslick’s concerns was forwarded allegations is warranted”. It has refused to spec- to either inquiry. Purdue hasn’t revealed the ify the content of the allegations that it consid- identities of the members of the second inquiry Rusi Taleyarkhan’s controversial bubble-fusion ered, except to say that they were “internal”. panel, but Dale Compton, a professor of indus- findings have been upheld by his university. Institutional proceedings involving Taleyar- trial engineering at Purdue and a member of khan began in March 2006, after concerns the first panel, says he has no recollection of extremely thorough review and with my full about his work were reported by Nature3. being asked to consider the questions about cooperation,” he told Nature. “Allegations made Pur due’s provost, Sally Mason, Taleyarkhan’s data. in the press have been known to Purdue, and the responded by saying that the “Purdue’s finding is as Lefteri Tsoukalas, who asked administration’s thoughtful conclusions have university would undertake mysterious as bubble Purdue to investigate Taleyar- been well-articulated in their statements.” an objective review. In June khan in February 2006, has Beyond the issue of misconduct, Purdue 2006, the university said that fusion itself.” called the announcement “an also makes clear that it endorses the scientific the review was complete, but outrage”. Tsoukalas was head value of Taleyarkhan’s work. In last week’s press declined to make its findings public. Last week’s of Purdue’s nuclear-engineering school until release, vice-president for university relations announcement referred to the findings of a sec- he resigned in October 2006 in protest at the Joe Bennett stated: “Professor Taleyarkhan ond internal inquiry subsequently appointed by way the university was handling the concerns. is engaged in very promising, significant Purdue’s dean of engineering, Leah Jamieson. He notes that the usual procedure for handling research, and we hope he will now be able to Taleyarkhan has told several news outlets that allegations of scientific misconduct is to hold a give his full attention to this important work.” he feels “vindicated”. But critics have questioned preliminary inquiry, then either proceed with Seth Putterman of the University of Cali- the validity of Purdue’s proceedings, and in par- an investigation or close the matter. That did fornia, Los Angeles, who has also been trying ticular, the apparent decision to limit its inquiry not happen in this case; instead, the university to replicate bubble fusion, thinks that Tale- to internal allegations, yet possibly ignoring the ran a second preliminary inquiry. Apart from yarkhan’s work is invalid. “Purdue’s defence of concerns, including fraud, communicated by Tsoukalas, calls by Nature have failed to locate Taleyarkhan’s approach to scientific research external researchers in the field. anyone who raised concerns about Taleyar- taints their reputation,” he says. “If Purdue were “They apparently narrowly focused the khan’s work who was interviewed during either interested in maintaining their credibility they charge and avoided the question of whether inquiry. “Purdue’s finding is as mysterious as should have appointed external members to the research was doctored,” says Ken Suslick, a bubble fusion itself,” says Tsoukalas. their panel.” Mason, who is ultimately respon- chemist at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Taleyarkhan, however, strongly defends the sible for academic affairs at Purdue, did not Champaign who has been attempting to rep- university’s process. “Purdue University in respond to Nature’s requests for comment. licate Taleyarkhan’s claims. Suslick is one of my opinion and experience has conducted an Purdue’s announcement appeared on the 690 NATURE|Vol 445|15 February 2007 NEWS BUBBLE FUSION Find Nature’s March 2006 investigation into bubble fusion online. www.nature.com/news/ bubblefusion Key biology databases go wiki Barend Mons’s first objective colleagues are allowing anyone comparing a large number of would be ambitious enough to edit the entries, modifying papers and other data. for most people: to meld and adding text and links as “Mons is a visionary,” says some of the most important new work is published. Amos Bairoch at the Swiss biomedical databases into a That’s an attractive Institute of Bioinformatics single information resource. proposition, say database in Geneva, a collaborator on But that’s just the beginning. administrators. Michael the project and the creator Mons, a bioinformatician at Ashburner, a geneticist at of Swiss-Prot. “This will be a the Erasmus Medical Centre in the University of Cambridge, revolution.” Rotterdam, the Netherlands, UK, helps run FlyBase, a Yet realizing the vision will also wants to apply the collection of gene data on the be difficult. Top of the list of Wikipedia philosophy. He’s model organism Drosophila challenges is persuading the inviting the whole research melanogaster. The database community to get involved. community to help update a receives around US$4 million Adding one’s own data is likely vast store of interlinked data. If a year from the US National to be the biggest motivator he and his colleagues can pull Institutes of Health and — Bairoch and Ashburner it off — and even the project’s employs up to five full-time say they get several calls advocates are not sure they curators, but still can’t keep a week asking for updates can — they could transform up with the relevant literature, to databases, usually from the databases that are central says Ashburner, researchers who to the work of many life who is working “This will be a want their own scientists. with Mons on papers added. A test version of the project, the new project. revolution.” Whether this will provisionally dubbed Wiki “We have a list of be enough to keep for Professionals (www. around 12 journals that we try the database fresh remains to wikiprofessional.info), is due to cover. Even that’s tough.” be seen, given that employers to launch in the next month. Anyone motivated to and funders tend not to value It already contains data from register can curate Wiki for updating information highly. L. FREENY/US DEPT ENERGY L. FREENY/US key sources, such as protein Professionals. Visitors to the Wiki for Professionals same day as Suslick, Putterman and others information from Swiss- dystrophin entry, for example, will also have to ensure that reported their attempt to replicate Taleyar- Prot and gene descriptions can update almost any of the additions don’t just reflect khan’s claims in an experiment built to his from Gene Ontology. Over information on the page, such individual researchers’ specifications8. They did not find any evi- the past year, Mons’s team as statements about the role pet theories. Mons hopes dence that fusion was occurring. has woven together these of the protein in disease. Users scientists will adopt entries Suslick, Putterman and Taleyarkhan had and other archives to create can also start new pages, and relevant to their work and use received funding from the US Department what, from a user’s point of from later this year will be automated systems to alert of Defense’s Advanced Research Projects view, seems to be a single given the option of creating them to changes, which they Agency (DARPA) for a project to test Taleyar- database. The page on the pages for themselves, with can then amend if necessary. khan’s original claims. Taleyarkhan has spent muscular-dystrophy protein links to relevant publications. The original data in Swiss-Prot around US$200,000 of this money on his dystrophin, for example, A final function, and the one and other databases will also bubble-fusion experiments. A spokeswoman contains data from Swiss-Prot that most excites Mons, is be protected.
Recommended publications
  • Thermonuclear AB-Reactors for Aerospace
    1 Article Micro Thermonuclear Reactor after Ct 9 18 06 AIAA-2006-8104 Micro -Thermonuclear AB-Reactors for Aerospace* Alexander Bolonkin C&R, 1310 Avenue R, #F-6, Brooklyn, NY 11229, USA T/F 718-339-4563, [email protected], [email protected], http://Bolonkin.narod.ru Abstract About fifty years ago, scientists conducted R&D of a thermonuclear reactor that promises a true revolution in the energy industry and, especially, in aerospace. Using such a reactor, aircraft could undertake flights of very long distance and for extended periods and that, of course, decreases a significant cost of aerial transportation, allowing the saving of ever-more expensive imported oil-based fuels. (As of mid-2006, the USA’s DoD has a program to make aircraft fuel from domestic natural gas sources.) The temperature and pressure required for any particular fuel to fuse is known as the Lawson criterion L. Lawson criterion relates to plasma production temperature, plasma density and time. The thermonuclear reaction is realised when L > 1014. There are two main methods of nuclear fusion: inertial confinement fusion (ICF) and magnetic confinement fusion (MCF). Existing thermonuclear reactors are very complex, expensive, large, and heavy. They cannot achieve the Lawson criterion. The author offers several innovations that he first suggested publicly early in 1983 for the AB multi- reflex engine, space propulsion, getting energy from plasma, etc. (see: A. Bolonkin, Non-Rocket Space Launch and Flight, Elsevier, London, 2006, Chapters 12, 3A). It is the micro-thermonuclear AB- Reactors. That is new micro-thermonuclear reactor with very small fuel pellet that uses plasma confinement generated by multi-reflection of laser beam or its own magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Thermonuclear Bomb 5 7 12
    1 Inexpensive Mini Thermonuclear Reactor By Alexander Bolonkin [email protected] New York, April 2012 2 Article Thermonuclear Reactor 1 26 13 Inexpensive Mini Thermonuclear Reactor By Alexander Bolonkin C&R Co., [email protected] Abstract This proposed design for a mini thermonuclear reactor uses a method based upon a series of important innovations. A cumulative explosion presses a capsule with nuclear fuel up to 100 thousands of atmospheres, the explosive electric generator heats the capsule/pellet up to 100 million degrees and a special capsule and a special cover which keeps these pressure and temperature in capsule up to 0.001 sec. which is sufficient for Lawson criteria for ignition of thermonuclear fuel. Major advantages of these reactors/bombs is its very low cost, dimension, weight and easy production, which does not require a complex industry. The mini thermonuclear bomb can be delivered as a shell by conventional gun (from 155 mm), small civil aircraft, boat or even by an individual. The same method may be used for thermonuclear engine for electric energy plants, ships, aircrafts, tracks and rockets. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Key words: Thermonuclear mini bomb, thermonuclear reactor, nuclear energy, nuclear engine, nuclear space propulsion. Introduction It is common knowledge that thermonuclear bombs are extremely powerful but very expensive and difficult to produce as it requires a conventional nuclear bomb for ignition. In stark contrast, the Mini Thermonuclear Bomb is very inexpensive. Moreover, in contrast to conventional dangerous radioactive or neutron bombs which generates enormous power, the Mini Thermonuclear Bomb does not have gamma or neutron radiation which, in effect, makes it a ―clean‖ bomb having only the flash and shock wave of a conventional explosive but much more powerful (from 1 ton of TNT and more, for example 100 tons).
    [Show full text]
  • Cavitation-Induced Fusion: Proof of Concept Vol
    1 Fomitchev-Zamilov: Cavitation-Induced Fusion: Proof of Concept Vol. 9 Cavitation-Induced Fusion: Proof of Concept Max I. Fomitchev-Zamilov Quantum Potential Corporation, 200 Innovation Blvd, Suite 254, State College, PA 16803 e-mail: [email protected] Cavitation-induced fusion (also known as bubble fusion or sonofusion) has been a topic of much debate and controversy and is generally (albeit incorrectly) perceived as unworkable. In this paper we present the theoretical foundations of cavitation-induced fusion and summarize the experimental results of the research conducted in the past 20 years. Based on the systematic study of all available data we conclude that the cavitation-induced fusion is feasible, doable, and can be used for commercial power generation. We present the results of our own research and disclose a commercial reactor prototype. threatened), to tenure and promotion issues and academic 1. Introduction misconduct (Krivit, 2011). As a result of the ensuing Nuclear fusion (which powers the sun) is the energy of the “bubblegate” scandal Taleyarkhan’s career was destroyed future: 10 microgram of deuterium is equivalent to a barrel of (Reich, 2009) and CIF research became a taboo. oil. Deuterium is cheap, plentiful and easily extracted from What was forgotten amid the outburst of emotions is that water. Unlike uranium fission in modern nuclear power plants cavitation-induced fusion is a fruitful area of research that must be deuterium fusion does not produce radioactive waste. Yet continued: no less than 7 independent peer-reviewed reports despite 40 years of research and over $20B in government exist demonstrating neutron emissions from collapsing spending (Chu, 2008) on inertial/magnetic confinement cavitation bubbles; even heavily criticized experiments by projects (ICF/MCF) the fusion power remains out of reach: to Taleyarkhan’s group have been successfully repeated (Xu & this date there are no fusion reactors capable of sustained Butt, 2005), (Forringer, Robbins, & Martin, 2006), (Bugg, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • ITER Aims and Technical Challenges
    I and I I - ITER Aims and Technical Challenges Jo Lister CRPP-EPFL Centre de Recherches en Physique des Plasmas Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Switzerland Outline of the first 2 talks q A previous lecture series was given by Prof. Ambrogio Fasoli q These introduced fusion and ITER but concentrated on the physics q Today and tomorrow we revisit the basic aims and design of ITER, but try to extract the technical challenges, and more importantly, where these challenges come from Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 2 Remember why we are doing this ! q Finite oil resource thinking was launched by Hubbert in 1956 when he predicted US oil production would peak around 1970 - no-one listened q It did - he was right - US production was allowed at 100% capacity q Now domestic production is decreasing q Idem for world oil, idem for gas Provide a long term energy supply Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 3 We don’t have a solution for demand exceeding production ! q Swenson’s Law says: “ To avoid deprivation resulting from the exhaustion of non-renewable resources, humanity must employ conservation and renewable resource substitutes sufficient to match depletion.” q One reason no-one important wants to know is that oil depletion might (?) lead to war, famine, plague…. Match supply and demand Jo Lister, CRPP-EPFL, "ITER Technical Challenges" CERN, May/June 2005 4 Fusion physics basics - Nuclear ?? q Where does fusion energy come from ? • The nucleus, B/A is the energy “stored”
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Fusion Again 1 Introduction
    Prespacetime Journal j February 2016 j Volume 7 j Issue 2 j pp. 379-396 379 Pitk¨anen,M., Cold Fusion Again Exploration Cold Fusion Again Matti Pitk¨anen 1 Abstract During years I have developed two models of cold fusion and in this article these models are combined together. The basic idea of TGD based model of cold is that cold fusion occurs in two steps. First dark nuclei (large heff = n × h) with much lower binding energy than ordinary nuclei are formed at magnetic flux tubes possibly carrying monopole flux. These nuclei can leak out the system along magnetic flux tubes. Under some circumstances these dark nuclei can transform to ordinary nuclei and give rise to detectable fusion products. An essential additional condition is that the dark protons can decay to neutrons rapidly enough by exchanges of dark weak bosons effectively massless below atomic length scale. Also beta decays in which dark W boson decays to dark electron and neutrino can be considered. This allows to overcome the Coulomb wall and explains why final state nuclei are stable and the decay to ordinary nuclei does not yield only protons. Thus it seems that this model combined with the TGD variant of Widom-Larsen model could explain nicely the existing data. In this chapter I will describe the steps leading to the TGD inspired model for cold fusion combining the earlier TGD variant of Widom-Larsen modelwith the model inspired by the TGD inspired model of Pollack's fourth phase of water using as input data findings from laser pulse induced cold fusion discovered by Leif Holmlid and collaborators.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research Association Euratom-CEA, Centre De
    Looking Back at Half a Century of Fusion Research P. STOTT Association Euratom-CEA, Centre de Cadarache, 13108 Saint Paul lez Durance, France. This article gives a short overview of the origins of nuclear fusion and of its development as a potential source of terrestrial energy. 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, at the dawn of the twentieth century, physicists did not understand the source of the Sun‘s energy. Although classical physics had made major advances during the nineteenth century and many people thought that there was little of the physical sciences left to be discovered, they could not explain how the Sun could continue to radiate energy, apparently indefinitely. The law of energy conservation required that there must be an internal energy source equal to that radiated from the Sun‘s surface but the only substantial sources of energy known at that time were wood or coal. The mass of the Sun and the rate at which it radiated energy were known and it was easy to show that if the Sun had started off as a solid lump of coal it would have burnt out in a few thousand years. It was clear that this was much too shortœœthe Sun had to be older than the Earth and, although there was much controversy about the age of the Earth, it was clear that it had to be older than a few thousand years. The realization that the source of energy in the Sun and stars is due to nuclear fusion followed three main steps in the development of science.
    [Show full text]
  • Copernic Agent Search Results
    Copernic Agent Search Results Search: sonofusion (The exact phrase) Found: 1626 result(s) on _Full.Search Date: 7/17/2010 5:51:35 AM 1. New sonofusion experiment produces results without external neutron source Mar 2009 - ...Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute New sonofusion experiment produces results without...results in 2004, suggesting that "sonofusion" may be a viable approach to producing...technique, which has been dubbed "sonofusion," produces a shock wave t http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-01/rpi-nse012706.php 93% 2. Bubbles feel the heat http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/21654 92% 3. Directory:Sonofusion - PESWiki Directory of technologies and resources relating to sonofusion, also known as bubble fusion, which involves room temperature fusion using sound frequencies " ... http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Sonofusion 92% 4. Evidence bubbles over to support tabletop nuclear fusion device The researchers believe the new evidence shows that "sonofusion" generates nuclear reactions by creating tiny bubbles that implode with tremendous force. http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion.html 92% 5. Research Uses Sonofusion to Generate Temperatures Hot Enough For Fusion - The Tech Mar 2009 - ...Article Tools E-Mail Print Write the Editor Research Uses Sonofusion to Generate Temperatures Hot Enough For Fusion By Kenneth Chang...tabletop. Putterman's approach is to use sound waves, called sonofusion or bubble fusion, to expand and col http://tech.mit.edu/V127/N7/long5.html 92% 6. Roger Stringham Sonofusion Jets Sonofusion is a developing alternate energy technology that has the potential to replace polluting hydrocarbons which include fossil fuels. The economics for sonofusion appear feasible now with its application to heating large structures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fusion Illusion Max Schulz
    The Fusion Illusion Max Schulz o hear President Barack that power our lives. Moreover, the Obama tell it, we need to renewable energy technologies that Tfundamentally overhaul the the president prefers—like wind, way we produce, deliver, and con- solar, and biomass—now make up sume energy. After the House of only three percent of our electricity Representatives passed the Waxman- use, and an even smaller share of our Markey cap-and-trade bill in June, overall energy consumption. This the president said negligible por- it would “spark a Sun in a Bottle: tion of America’s clean energy trans- The Strange History of Fusion and the energy economy Science of Wishful Thinking formation in our comes despite the By Charles Seife economy. It will Viking ~ 2008 ~ 304 pp. fact that many spur the develop- $25.95 (cloth) $16 (paper) tens of billions of ment of low carbon dollars in state and sources of energy— everything from federal subsidies have been pumped wind, solar, and geothermal power to into renewables for roughly three safer nuclear energy and cleaner coal. decades. It will spur new energy savings, like It is these sources that the presi- the efficient windows and other mate- dent proposes should overtake and rials that reduce heating costs in the replace the fossil fuels that dominate winter and cooling costs in the sum- our current energy economy. He is mer. And most importantly, it will engaged in a staggering exercise in make possible the creation of millions wishful thinking. The limitations of of new jobs.” He repeated those senti- these technologies and fuels are well ments before the G-8 in Italy several known by now: they are prohibitive- weeks later when he stated, “One of ly expensive, they are intermittent my highest priorities as president is power providers, and they have a low to drive a clean energy transforma- energy density compared to fossil tion of our economy.” fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry Casts Doubt on Bubble Reactions
    From the Science newsroom More News Posted 24 July, 5 pm PST Chemistry Casts Doubt on Bubble APNet Reactions Home A controversial claim that scientists had detected signs of fusion in a rapidly collapsing bubble may have further imploded this week. A new experiment that measures the energy budget of a collapsing bubble for the first time indicates that so-called "bubble fusion" is unlikely to occur. The controversy involves a peculiar phenomenon known as Encyclopedia of sonoluminescence. If liquid is zapped with sound waves in the Biodiversity right manner, it will "crack," creating bubbles that contract so Online violently that they glow with light. Earlier this year, Science Journals published the results of such an experiment by engineer Rusi Taleyarkhan of Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee and five colleagues. The group reported the detection of neutrons that they argued were generated by a fusion reaction inside a sonoluminescing bubble. The claim was greeted with skepticism even before it was published (Science, 8 March, pp. 1808 and 1868). Now two scientists have taken a close look at whether enough energy is available in an imploding bubble for fusion. Kenneth Suslick and Yuri Didenko, sonochemists at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, used fluorescent dyes to measure Book the byproducts of sonoluminescence in water. From the Catalog concentrations of these molecules created by different single- Concise Encyclopedia of bubble sonoluminescence experiments, Suslick and Didenko the Ethics of New figured out the conditions that led to those reactions--and Technologies where the energy goes when the bubble collapses. Most of the energy is dissipated by chemical reactions, Suslick reports in the 25 July issue of Nature, noting that the experiment roughly matches theorists' expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • Fusion-The-Energy-Of-The-Universe
    Fusion The Energy of the Universe WHAT IS THE COMPLEMENTARY SCIENCE SERIES? We hope you enjoy this book. If you would like to read other quality science books with a similar orientation see the order form and reproductions of the front and back covers of other books in the series at the end of this book. The Complementary Science Series is an introductory, interdisciplinary, and relatively inexpensive series of paperbacks for science enthusiasts. The series covers core subjects in chemistry, physics, and biological sciences but often from an interdisciplinary perspective. They are deliberately unburdened by excessive pedagogy, which is distracting to many readers, and avoid the often plodding treatment in many textbooks. These titles cover topics that are particularly appropriate for self-study although they are often used as complementary texts to supplement standard discussion in textbooks. Many are available as examination copies to professors teaching appropriate courses. The series was conceived to fill the gaps in the literature between conventional textbooks and monographs by providing real science at an accessible level, with minimal prerequisites so that students at all stages can have expert insight into important and foundational aspects of current scientific thinking. Many of these titles have strong interdisciplinary appeal and all have a place on the bookshelves of literate laypersons. Potentialauthorsareinvitedtocontactoureditorialoffice: [email protected]. Feedback on the titles is welcome. Titles in the Complementary Science Series are detailed at the end of these pages. A 15% discount is available (to owners of this edition) on other books in this series—see order form at the back of this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing Fusion Energy 2017 Date: March 2017 Pages: 185 Price: US$ 850.00 (Single User License) ID: AAF7C2E2BB4EN
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing Fusion Energy 2017 https://marketpublishers.com/r/AAF7C2E2BB4EN.html Date: March 2017 Pages: 185 Price: US$ 850.00 (Single User License) ID: AAF7C2E2BB4EN Abstracts Fusion power is the power generated by nuclear fusion reactions. In this kind of reaction, two light atomic nuclei fuse together to form a heavier nucleus and in doing so, release a large amount of energy. In a more general sense, the term can also refer to the production of net usable power from a fusion source, similar to the usage of the term "steam power." Most design studies for fusion power plants involve using the fusion reactions to create heat, which is then used to operate a steam turbine, which drives generators to produce electricity. Except for the use of a thermonuclear heat source, this is similar to most coal, oil, and gas-fired power stations as well as fission-driven nuclear power stations. Aruvian Research brings a research report on the lucrative field of fusion energy – Analyzing Fusion Energy 2017. The research report takes a look at the importance of fusion power in an era where the usage of renewable energy has become a norm. The report begins with an analysis of the basics of fusion energy, the various stages of development in fusion power, the magnetic concept, the Z-pinch concept, inertial confinement concept and many others. The role of tokamaks are analyzed in the report, along with the physics of fusion reactors. The concept of plasma heating is analyzed so as to provide a better understanding of fusion power.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Feasibility of Cold Fusion According to the BSM - Supergravitation Unified Theory
    Theoretical Feasibility of Cold Fusion According to the BSM - Supergravitation Unified Theory Stoyan Sarg Sargoytchev York University, Toronto, Canada * E-mail: [email protected] Advances in the field of cold fusion and the recent success of the nickel and hydrogen exothermal reaction, in which the energy release cannot be explained by a chemical process, need a deeper understanding of the nuclear reactions and, more particularly, the possibility for modification of the Coulomb barrier. The current theoretical understanding based on high temperature fusion does not offer an explanation for the cold fusion or LENR. The treatise “Basic Structures of Matter – Supergravitation Unified Theory”, based on an alternative concept of the physical vacuum, provides an explanation from a new point of view by using derived three-dimensional structures of the atomic nuclei. For explanation of the nuclear energy, a hypothesis of a field micro-curvature around the superdense nucleus is suggested. Analysis of some successful cold fusion experiments resulted in practical considerations for modification of the Coulomb barrier. The analysis also predicts the possibility of another cold fusion reaction based on some similarity between the nuclear structures of Ni and Cr. Keywords: cold fusion, LENR, Coulomb barrier, atomic nuclear structures, alpha decay 1. Introduction The scientific research on cold fusion was pioneered by High Flyn (1913-1997), an emeritus professor at the University of Rochester. Being an expert in ultrasonic waves, he advocated a method of cold fusion based on cavitation in liquid metals with injected hydrogen or deuterium and obtained a patent in 1982 [1]. At this time however, little attention was paid since cold fusion was thought to be theoretically impossible.
    [Show full text]