Natural Capitalism—References

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Capitalism—References 1 2 3 REFERENCES 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Abe, J. M., Dempsey, P.E., and Basset, D. A., : Business Ecology: Giving Your Organi- 11 zation the Natural Edge, Butterworth-Heinemann; The Business Ecology Network, 12 PO Box , Shady Side, MD -, /-, fax -, www.naturaledge.org. 13 Abramovitz, J. N., : “Putting a Value on Nature’s ‘Free’ Services,” WorldWatch 14 ():, Jan./Feb. 15 Adler, R. W., and Mace, T., : “Water, water . ,”Natural Resources Defense Council, 16 Los Angeles Times, Apr. 17 Alexander, C., : A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 18 Alliance to Save Energy, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Natural 19 Resources Defense Council, Tellus Institute, and Union of Concerned Scientists 20 : Energy Innovations. A Prosperous Path to a Clean Environment, June, ASE, 21 th St. NW, Suite , Washington, DC , www.ase.org. 22 Amato, I., : “Fomenting a Revolution in Miniature,” Science :–,Oct.. 23 American Forest and Paper Association : Fast Facts, th St. NW, Washington, 24 DC , /-. 25 American Forest and Paper Association, www.afandpa.org, downloaded Feb. , . 26 American Institute of Physics : Efficient Use of Energy, American Physical Society 27 Studies on the Technical Aspects of the More Efficient Use of Energy, Conf. Procs. 28 No. , AIP,New York, NY. 29 Anderson,R.C.,: Interface Sustainability Report, Interface Corp., La Grange, GA. 30 ——— : Mid-Course Correction, Peregrinzilla Press, Interface Corp., Atlanta, GA. 31 Andreeva, N., : “ You Deserve a Starch Container Today,” Business Week, p. ,Oct. 32 , [email protected]. 33 Arbeus, U., : “The N-Pump — A New Concept,” Scientific Impeller :–, ITT 34 Flygt AB, Solna, Sweden, ++ + -, fax -. 35 Arnold, M. B., and Day, R. M., : The Next Bottom Line: Making Sustainable Develop- 36 ment Tangible, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. 37 Arrow, K., Jorgenson, D., Krugman, P., Nordhaus, W., Solow, R., et al., : “The Econ- 38 omists’ Statement on Climate Change,” Feb. , available from Redefining Progress, 39 San Francisco, CA, /-, www.rprogress.org. 40 Atchison, J., : “Nonwood Fiber Could Play Major Role in U.S. Papermaking Fur- 41 nishes,” Pulp and Paper ():–. 42 Atmospheric Pollution Prevention Division, USEPA : “Role of Technology in Cli- 43 mate Change Policy,”briefing paper, Washington, DC, ca. Nov. 44 Audin, L., and Howe, B., : Success at Zero Net Cost: Columbia University’s Achieve- 45 ments in Energy Efficiency, CS--,E source, Boulder, CO , www.esource.com. 46 Audin, L., Houghton, D., Shepard, M., and Hawthorne, W., : Lighting Technology 47 Atlas, E source, Boulder, CO. 48 49 349 350 REFERENCES 1 Austin, D., Goldemberg, J., and Parker, G., :“Contributions to Climate Change: Are 2 Conventional Metrics Misleading the Debate?,” Climate Notes, Oct., World Resources 3 Institute, Washington, DC, http://www.wri.org/wri/climate/. 4 Australian Plumbing Industry : “‘Leading Edge’ Technology,”Oct./Nov. 5 Automotive Industries : July centenary issue, p. 6 Automotive News :“Cat’s B Makes It Big in the Real World,”Nov. 7 Axelsson, S., : Ecological Tax Reform, Naturskyddsföringen (Swedish Society for 8 Nature Conservation), Stockholm, Oct. 9 Ayres, E., : “Making Paper Without Trees,” Worldwatch , Sept./Oct. 10 Ayres, R. U., : Technology and Environment, National Academy of Sciences, Wash- 11 ington, DC. 12 ——— : “Toxic Heavy Metals: Materials Cycle Optimization,” Proc. Natl. Acad. 13 Scis. :–,Feb. 14 ——— : “Thermodynamics and Process Analysis for Future Economic Scenarios,” 15 Envtl. and Res. Ecs. :–. 16 ——— a: “Economic Growth: Politically Necessary but Not Environmentally 17 Friendly,” Ecol. Ecs. : –; see also “Achieving Eco-Efficiency in Business,”World 18 Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva. 19 ——— : “Industrial Metabolism and the Grand Nutrient Cycles,” working paper, 20 //EPS, INSEAD, Boul. de Constance, Fontainebleau Cedex, France. 21 ——— a: “Turning Point: The End of the Growth Paradigm,” Working Paper 22 //EPS, Centre for the Management of Environmental Resources, INSEAD, 23 Fontainebleau, France. 24 ——— : Turning Point: The End of the Growth Paradigm, Earthscan, London. 25 Ayres, R. U. and L. W., : Industrial Ecology, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Glos., UK, 26 and Brookfield, VT. 27 Bagby, M. E., : Annual Report of the United States of America, HarperBusiness, New 28 York, NY. 29 Bain, A., :“The Hindenburg Disaster: A Compelling Theory of Probable Cause and 30 Effect,” Procs. Natl. Hydr. Assn. 8th Ann. Hydrogen Mtg. (Alexandria, VA),Mar. –, 31 pp. –. 32 Baldwin, J., : Buckyworks: Buckminster Fuller’s Ideas for Today, John Wiley, New 33 York, NY. 34 Bancroft, B., Shepard, M., Lovins, A. B., and Bishop, R., : The State of the Art: Water 35 Heating, Competitek/Rocky Mountain Institute, Oct., E source, Boulder, CO 36 , www.esource.com. 37 BankAmerica : BankAmerica Environmental Program 1997 Progress Report, Bank- 38 America, Los Angeles, CA. 39 Barten, P., : personal communication, Oct. , Yale Forestry School. 40 Bechmann, A., : Landbau-Wende: Gesunde Landwirtschaft — Gesunde Ernährung, 41 S. Fischer, Frankfurt. 42 Behrens, W. W. III, : “The Dynamics of Natural Resource Utilization,” Ch. pp. 43 – in Meadows, D. L. and D. H., , Toward Global Equilibrium: Selected 44 Papers, Wright-Allen Press, Cambridge, MA. 45 Benyus, J. M., : Biomimicry: Innovations Inspired by Nature, William Morrow, New 46 York, NY. 47 Berner, E. K. and R. A., : Global Environment: Water, Air, and Geochemical Cycles, 48 Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 49 REFERENCES 351 Berry, W., : “Solving for Pattern,” in The Gift of Good Land, North Point Press, San 1 Francisco, CA. 2 ——— : “Private Property and the Common Wealth,” Another Turn of the Crank, 3 Counterpoint, Washington, DC. 4 ——— : “Back to the Land,” The Amicus Journal ():–, Winter, Natural 5 Resources Defense Council, New York; a longer version, “The Whole Horse,” 6 appeared in the British journal Resurgence , May/June . 7 Bintrim, S. B., Ireland, J. S., Joseph, D. A., Donohue, T. J., Handelsman, J., and Good- 8 man, R. M., : “Molecular and computational analyses reveal vast phylogenetic 9 diversity of bacteria in soil,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Scis. :–. 10 Bishop, Ron, : personal communication, Feb. , General Manager, Central Platte 11 Natural Resource District, N. Kaufmann Ave., Grand Island, NE, /-. 12 Bloome, P. D., and Cuperus, G. W., : “Aeration for Management of Stored Grain 13 Insects in Wheat,”#-, Winter Meeting (New Orleans), Am. Soc. Ag. Eng. 14 ( Niles Road, St. Joseph, MI ), Dec. –. 15 Blum, L., Denison, R. A., and Rusfon, J. F., : “A Life-Cycle Approach to Purchasing 16 and Using Environmentally Preferable Paper,” J. Indl. Ecol. ():–, Summer. 17 Bodlund, B., et al., : “The Challenge of Choices: Technology Options for the 18 Swedish Electricity Sector,” pp. – in Johansson, T. B., et al., eds., Electricity, 19 Lund University Press, Lund, Sweden. 20 Boonyatikarn, S., : “The Energy Conserving House,” Energy Expert Co. Ltd., Feb., 21 available from the author (Assoc. Prof. of Arch. and Dep. Dir. for Res. Affairs), Chu- 22 lalongkorn U., Phyathai Rd., Bangkok, Thailand, ++ + - , fax + 23 -. 24 Boulding, K.:“The Economics of Spaceship Earth,” Environmental Quality in a Growing 25 Economy, Jarret, H., ed., Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD. 26 Boxboard Containers : “Case Closed,”pp. –,Oct. 27 Bradford, P. A., : “No one gets out alive: the hijacking of the electric industry,” 28 Energy: Buildings, Economics, and the Earth Conference, New York, Earth Day,Apr. 29 Brandt, M., : personal communications, Aug. and , Commonwealth Edison 30 Company, Chicago, IL. 31 Braungart, M., : personal communication, Feb. 32 Bredehoeft, J., : “Physical Limitations of Water Resources,” pp. – in Engelbert, 33 E. A., with Scheuring, A. F.,eds., Water Scarcity: Impacts on Western Agriculture, Uni- 34 versity of California Press, Berkeley. 35 Briscoe, D., : “State of the World,”Jan. , Associated Press, Washington, DC. 36 Brody, J. E., : “Annual Health Care Cost of Meat Is Billions, Study Says,” New York 37 Times, Nov. 38 ——— : “Organic Farming Moves into the Mainstream,” New York Times,p., 39 Oct. 40 Brooke, L., : “Amory Lovins: Composite Crusader,” Automotive Industries, pp. 41 –, ,Sept. 42 Brower, D., : Let the Mountains Talk, Let the Rivers Run, HarperCollins, New York, 43 NY. 44 Brown, L. R., and Halweil, B., : “China’s Water Shortage Could Shake World Food 45 Security,” Worldwatch (): –, July/Aug. 46 Brown, L. R., Renner, M., and Flavin, C., : Vital Signs 1997, Worldwatch Institute, 47 Washington, DC, www.worldwatch.org. 48 49 352 REFERENCES 1 Brown, L. R., Flavin, C., and French, H., : State of the World 1998, Worldwatch Insti- 2 tute, Washington, DC, www.worldwatch.org. 3 Browne, J., : Address at Stanford University, May , www.bp.com. 4 Browning, W. D., : “Steaks and Mistakes: A Study of U.S. Beef Production,” Rocky 5 Mountain Institute internal research paper. 6 ——— : “NMB Bank Headquarters: The Impressive Performance of a Green 7 Building,” Urban Land, Urban Land Institute, pp. –, June. 8 ——— : “Giving Productivity an Energy-Efficient Boost,” Consulting-Specifying 9 Engineer, pp. –, Jan. 10 ——— a: “Boosting productivity with IEQ improvements,” Building Design and 11 Construction, pp. –,Apr. 12 Brownstein, E., Hall, S., and Lotspeich C., with Lovins, A. B., : “Resource Efficiency 13 in Wood Fiber Services: A ‘Soft Fiber Path’ for Forest Products Markets,” Systems 14 Group on Forests, Rocky Mountain Institute, Snowmass, CO, July, draft to be pub- 15 lished in . 16 Brylawski, M., and Lovins, A. B., : “Ultralight-Hybrid Vehicle
Recommended publications
  • NATURAL CAPITALISM by Christopher Juniper
    Rocky Mountain Institute/volume xvii #1/spring 2001 RMISolutions newsletter F ROZEN ASSETS? ALASKAN OIL’S THREAT TO NATIONAL NERGY ECURITY E S by Amory B. Lovins and L. Hunter Lovins “We must continue, I believe, to safeguard the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, one of the last truly wild places on Earth—the Serengeti of the Americas.” —PRESIDENT CLINTON, JANUARY 17, 2001 The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. photo: Galen Rowell S YOU READ THIS ISSUE OF RMI improve but compromise national energy Solutions, Congress is debating security and economic vitality, especially CONTENTS whether the oil potential when compared with alternatives that ben- A HYPERCAR MAKES ITS MOVE ... page 4 beneath the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge efit both and improve the environment. (ANWR) in Alaska is worth the environ- THE NATCAP CONSUMER ..... page 6 mental damage caused by extracting and FOLLOW THE MONEY burning it. Largely unexamined so far are First, the economics of drilling for Refuge A LETTER FROM OZ ....... page 8 more basic questions: Is it profitable? Is it oil look as unrewarding as its politics. For GDS IN EUROPE ........ page 10 necessary? Is drilling a good idea? Is there a the oil industry to invest, the Refuge must better way? hold a lot of oil, and the oil must sell for a BILL BROWNING,HONORARY AIA . page 11 The rationale for drilling in the Refuge is to high enough price for long enough to DEAR ROCKY .......... page 12 find a domestic oil supply, income for recover costs and earn profits. When JOHN TODD—WATER DOCTOR .. page 14 Alaska, and profit for private firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Energy Policy: New Opportunities for Japan
    Advances in Energy Policy: New Opportunities for Japan Amory B. Lovins CEO (Research), Rocky Mountain Institute, www.rmi.org Director, The Hypercar Center, www.hypercarcenter.org Chairman, Hypercar Inc., www.hypercar.com Energy Policy Working Group (Kaya Yoichi-sensei, Chairman), MITI MIITI, Tokyo, 27 November 2000 Copyright © 2000 Rocky Mountain Institute. All rights reserved. Noncommercial distribution by the Working Group is permitted for its and participants’ internal use. The Brownian Random Walk of World Real Oil Price, 1881–1993 Year-to-year percentage price % change, y ea r (-12 ,+255) n -1 to n changes with a one-year lag in 1974 8 5 between the axes. If the price movements showed a trend, 6 5 the “center of gravity” would 4 5 favor a particular quadrant. All that 2 5 % ch an g e, y ear n to n +1 happened after -5 5 -3 5 -15 5 25 4 5 65 85 5 1973 is that volatility tripled; (+255,+4) -1 5 in 197 3 changes stayed perfectly random, -3 5 just as for any -5 5 other commodity. Graph devised by H.R. Holt, USDOE Market surprise: world crude-oil real price vs. oil consumption, 1970–1Q2000 50 1981 1983 45 1980 40 35 1985 30 1979 1991 25 1974 2000 1997 (1Q consumption) 20 1987 15 1989 1998 10 price (Saudi 34°API light,1992 $) 1999 5 1970 1973 0 45.0045 50.0050 55.00 55 60 60.00 65 65.00 70 70.00 75 75.00 80 80.00 consumption, million barrels per day Data source: http://www.doe.eia.gov, downloaded 24 October 2000 By 2050, an affluent world could meet or beat a 3–4´ C reduction goal ´ 2 ´ 3–4 ÷ 2–4 population ´ affluence per capita ´ carbon intensity C = energy conversion eff.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capitalism on the U.S.-Mexican Border
    Natural Capitalism on the U.S.-Mexican Border Michael Kinsley, Community Development Specialist Hunter Lovins, Co-CEO Rocky Mountain Institute Some commentators argue that the climatic stability and detoxification of driving force behind the booming U.S.- human and industrial waste. Though Mexican border economy is cheap labor these services are fundamental to and lax environmental controls. If they business and to human life, along the are correct—and there’s much evidence border many are declining, some rapidly. to support their claims—the resulting Worse, many have no known substitutes distress rampant on the border would at any price. Unfortunately, the cost of argue that an alternative is needed. The destroying ecosystem services may good news is that there is an approach become apparent only when the services that can provide the economic vitality break down, such as the devastating l993 without creating unmanageable Tijuana flood. problems. The rapidly emerging practice Fortunately, the practice of Natural of Natural Capitalism offers a new Capitalism can protect living systems approach to business and economic while offering superior opportunities. It development that improves profits and involves four shifts in the way business competitiveness while protecting living and economic development is systems and the future. conducted: Simple changes to the way businesses First, dramatically increase the are run, built on advanced techniques for productivity with which resources are using resources more productively, can used: Through fundamental changes in yield startling benefits both for today’s both technology and production design, shareholders and for future generations. farsighted companies are implementing Also, straightforward changes to the way ways to make energy, water and community decisions are made, based on materials stretch many times further than realistic examination of the full range of they do today.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Management Framework for Sustainable Cities: Insights Into Multiple Concepts and Principles
    The Sustainable City IX, Vol. 1 111 Integrated management framework for sustainable cities: insights into multiple concepts and principles K. G. Baffour Awuah & C. A. Booth Construction and Property Research Centre, University of the West of England, UK Abstract There is a growing call for cities and the built environment to be managed or re- managed based on the idea of sustainability. The rationale is to make cities more resilient and productive as centres of production and consumption, and address the rising environmental and socio-cultural challenges associated with twenty-first century urban centres. There are, however, emerging or extant concepts that attempt to supplant or espouse sustainability principles or related principles; thereby, creating a seemingly unclear framework to drive effective and efficient management of cities. Through interrogation of extant literature, this study identifies four main neighbouring concepts – industrial ecology, natural capitalism, cradle-to-cradle and circular economy and how they compare and contrast with sustainability in the context of the built environment. Despite the seemingly conceptual difference between sustainability and the neighbouring concepts, they prescribe virtually the same set of principles and operationalisation indicators. However, given the multiplicity of the concepts, their set of principles and indicators, and uniqueness of different cities, an initial broad integrated framework needs to be developed based on all the concepts. Subsequently, individual cities taking cognisance of their peculiar circumstances will then have to craft their own frameworks for effective and efficient management in the face of growing economic uncertainties, poverty, rapid urbanisation and other environmental and socio-cultural challenges. Keywords: cities, economic uncertainties, environment, strategy, sustainability.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Sustainable Capitalism an Oxymoron?
    Is Sustainable Capitalism an Oxymoron? David Schweickart Loyola University Chicago Abstract Is Joel Kovel right that it is either “the end of capitalism or the end of the world”? Or are Paul Hawken, Amory and Hunter Lovins right that we are on the brink of a “natural capitalism” that can usher in an ecological and social utopia, “a world where cities have become peaceful and serene because cars and buses are whisper quiet, vehicles exhaust only water vapor, and parks and greenways have replaced unneeded urban freeways. Living standards for all people have dramatically improved, particularly for the poor and those in developing countries. Involuntary unemployment no longer exists. .” I argue that while Hunter-Lovins’ have much to off er and Kovel overstates his case, a sustainable capitalism is highly unlikely. I sketch an alternative to both “natural capitalism” and Kovel’s non-market socialism that is more promising than either. Keywords capitalism, socialism, sustainability, natural capitalism, exponential growth, ecological crisis, economic democracy Marx says that revolutions are the locomotives of world history. But the situation may be quite diff erent. Perhaps revolutions are not the train ride, but the human race grabbing for the emergency brake. Walter Benjamin Th e subtitle of Joel Kovel ’s Th e Enemy of Nature (originally published in 2002, revised edition 2007) states his thesis bluntly: Th e End of Capitalism or the End of the World ? Kovel thinks we need a revolution—although he is fully cogni- zant as to how remote that prospect seems. Growing numbers of people are beginning to realize that capitalism is the uncontrol- lable force driving our ecological crisis, only to become frozen in their tracks by the awesome implications of this insight (Kovel 2007:xi).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capitalism the Laws We're Ignoring Determine How Life Sustains Itself
    Natural Capitalism The laws we're ignoring determine how life sustains itself. Commerce requires living systems for its welfare -- it is emblematic of the times that this even needs to be said. Because of our industrial prowess, we emphasize what people can do but tend to ignore what nature does. Commercial institutions, We can create new jobs, restore our environment, and promote social proud of their achievements, do not see that healthy living systems -- clean stability. The solutions are creative, practical, and profitable. air and water, healthy soil, stable climates -- are integral to a functioning economy. As our living systems deteriorate, traditional forecasting and Paul Hawken business economics become the equivalent of house rules on a sinking cruise ship. Somewhere along the way to free-market capitalism, the United States became the most wasteful society on the planet. Most of us know it. There is One is tempted to say that there is nothing wrong with capitalism except that the waste we can see: traffic jams, irreparable VCRs, Styrofoam coffee cups, it has never been tried. Our current industrial system is based on accounting landfills; the waste we can't see: Superfund sites, greenhouse gases, principles that would bankrupt any company. radioactive waste, vagrant chemicals; and the social waste we don't want to think about: homelessness, crime, drug addiction, our forgotten infirm and Conventional economic theories will not guide our future for a simple elderly. reason: They have never placed "natural capital" on the balance sheet. When it is included, not as a free amenity or as a putative infinite supply, but as an Nationally and globally, we perceive social and environmental decay as integral and valuable part of the production process, everything changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capitalism, Growth Theory and the Sustainability Debate
    NATURAL CAPITALISM, GROWTH THEORY AND THE SUSTAINABILITY DEBATE Daphne Greenwood Professor of Economics University of Colorado at Colorado Springs Presented at the Southwest Economic Association meetings Fort Worth, Texas March 2001 This paper explores links and gaps between the popular debate over sustainability, neoclassical and endogenous growth theory, and the “natural capitalism” argument. For more information, contact Daphne Greenwood at [email protected] 719-262-4031 In this paper, I explore the links between growth theory, the sustainability debate, and the “natural capitalism” argument. I also point out areas where they are in contradiction with each other. Section I summarizes the modern arguments of traditional neoclassical and the new endogenous growth theories, section II the sustainability debate which has arisen primarily from environmental and social concerns, and section III the “natural capitalism” arguments. In section IV I look at unresolved questions which arise from comparing these three. I. Neoclassical and endogenous growth theory Neoclassical economics has historically been more focused on explaining short run microeconomic patterns such as how prices are determined than on dynamic models explaining growth and change over time. Neoclassical growth theory is best expressed by Solow’s Cobb- Douglas production function showing diminishing returns to capital and labor along with an exogeneous technological factor. Income (Y) is a function of the levels of capital (K) and labor (L), the returns to each of them (β and 1-β), and an exogeneous technological factor, A. (1) 1-β β Yt = At K L The absence of natural resources as a separate, and potentially limiting, factor of production implies that (1) technological change can substitute for even nonrenewable resources and (2) market pricing will achieve an efficient allocation over time of all resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Road Map for Natural Capitalism by Amory B
    A Road Map for Natural Capitalism by Amory B. Lovins, L. Hunter Lovins, and Paul Hawken Reprint 99309 MAY–JUNE 1999 Reprint Number kathleen m. eisenhardt and PATCHING: RESTITCHING BUSINESS PORTFOLIOS 99303 shona l. brown IN DYNAMIC MARKETS robert simons HOW RISKY IS YOUR COMPANY? 99311 jay w. lorsch and CHANGING LEADERS: THE BOARD’S ROLE IN CEO SUCCESSION 99308 rakesh khurana A ROUNDTABLE WITH PHILIP CALDWELL, GEORGE D. KENNEDY, G. G. MICHELSON, HENRY WENDT, AND ALFRED M. ZEIEN JON R. KATZENBACH AND FIRING UP THE FRONT LINE 99307 JASON A. SANTAMARIA ROSABETH MOSS KANTER FROM SPARE CHANGE TO REAL CHANGE: THE SOCIAL 99306 SECTOR AS BETA SITE FOR BUSINESS INNOVATION JEFFREY PFEFFER AND THE SMART-TALK TRAP 99310 ROBERT I. SUTTON AMORY B. LOVINS, L. HUNTER A ROAD MAP FOR NATURAL CAPITALISM 99309 LOVINS, AND PAUL HAWKEN JACQUELINE VISCHER HBR CASE STUDY WILL THIS OPEN SPACE WORK? 99312 DAVID DUNNE AND thinking about… CHAKRAVARTHI NARASIMHAN THE NEW APPEAL OF PRIVATE LABELS 99302 DANNY ERTEL IDEAS AT WORK TURNING NEGOTIATION INTO A CORPORATE CAPABILITY 99304 donald f. hastings first person LINCOLN ELECTRIC’S HARSH LESSONS FROM 99305 INTERNATIONAL EXPANSION nicholas g. carr books in review BEING VIRTUAL: CHARACTER AND THE NEW ECONOMY 99301 A Road Map for Natural Capitalism Business strategies built around the radically more productive use of natural resources can solve many environmental problems at a profit. by Amory B. Lovins, L. Hunter Lovins, and Paul Hawken n september 16, 1991, a small group of scientists was sealed inside Biosphere II, a glittering 3.2-acre glass and Ometal dome in Oracle, Arizona.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinventing Fire Putting Green Heavy Trucks Unlikely by Amory B
    Solutions Journal INVENTING FIRERE After 27 years of innovation, Amory B. Lovins discusses RMI’s Next Big Thing Fall 2009 Also in this issue— Putting Green Footstep to Use p. 16 Heavy Trucks p. 18 Unlikely Partners: RMI and Duke Energy p. 20 A Publication of Rocky Mountain Institute® Rocky Mountain Institute® Solutions Volume 2 • Number 3 • Fall 2009 Journal 6 16 18 20 Reinventing Fire Putting Green Heavy Trucks Unlikely By Amory B. Lovins Footstep to Use By Kelly Vaughn Partners: RMI Since 1982, Rocky Mountain By Molly Miller RMI and partners form the and Duke Institute has been hatching North American Council For gamechanging innovations to Why would anyone need to Freight Efficiency to stimulate Energy help make the world richer, know the amount of carbon higher levels of innovation fairer, cooler, and safer. storage inherent in a scrub and investment in the By Llewelleyn Wells Here, RMI Chairman and ecosystem, and how would he trucking industry. Here, Kelly Chief Scientist Amory Lovins or she find out such a thing? Vaughn describes how the Jim Rogers, Duke Energy’s introduces our grandest effort Molly Miller describes the why new NACFE came to be. Chairman, President, and CEO, yet, Reinventing Fire. and how as Green Footstep is the first to remind people gets put to use. that if his company were a country, it would rank forty- first in the world in carbon emissions—just a notch above North Korea. Llewellyn Wells writes about the Institute’s recent work to help Duke change that statistic. Rocky Mountain Institute® (RMI) is an independent, entrepreneurial, 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, and L
    Journal of Markets & Morality 3, no. 2 (Fall 2000), 261-275 Copyright © 2000 Center for Economic Personalism Reviews Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins New York: Little, Brown and Company, 1999, 396 pp. Hard Green: Saving the Environment from the Environmentalists (A Conservative Manifesto) Peter Huber New York: Basic Books in association with the Manhattan Institute, 2000, 288 pp. Review by John A. Baden Chairman Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment, and Gallatin Writers, Inc. Joshua Zaffos Research Assistant Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment “[M]any people engaged in various economic activities do realize it is important to learn from nature and apply the knowledge to what they do…. [A]ll kinds of people now understand that their success depends on working knowledgeably along with natural processes and principles … [which is] diametrically different from supposing that human beings are exempt from nature’s dictates or that they are masters of nature.” Jane Jacobs, The Nature of Economies Here is the good news: There is growing agreement among commentators that economic prosperity and environmental quality are complementary as- pects of progress. Two recent books advocate this argument from quite differ- ent perspectives. The bad news, however, is that conservatives and free-market advocates continue to debase environmentalists. This trend is especially un- fortunate because it alienates many citizens during a rising tide of environ- mental sensitivity: Polls show that four out of every five Americans are self-confessed environmentalists, which is predictable, since environmental 261 262 Reviews Markets & Morality 263 concern increases with prosperity.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Surprises for the 21St Century
    This essay was originally published in the Journal of International Affairs, Fall 1999, 53, no. 1. Energy Surprises for the 21st Century By Amory Lovins and Chris Lotspeich ©Rocky Mountain Institute, 1739 Snowmass Creek Rd, Snowmass, CO 81654 Twenty-three years ago, Amory Lovins was heavily criticized as wildly optimistic for predicting that energy efficiency would play a major role in shifting United States energy use patterns, thus reducing overall consumption far below official forecasts.1 He argued that energy would shift in more economically and environmentally benign directions, while energy intensity (primary energy consumed per real dollar of gross domestic product [GDP]) would markedly decrease without threatening continued economic growth. Today, total U.S. energy use is slightly below the level suggested in that 1976 “soft energy path”2 graph (see figure below), and in all but five of the intervening years the amount of energy consumed per dollar of GDP has fallen—for a total drop of more than 35 percent since 1973. Renewable energy sources were delayed a decade by federal hostility—exemplified by reductions of more than 90 percent in research and development budgets and suppression of public information—and are only now slowly regaining momentum.3 Improvements in technology and integrated whole- systems design techniques, and greater attention focused by competitive pressures, are increasing the potential for a “third wave”4 of energy efficiency, reversing the period of stagnation from 1986 to 1996. 250 primaryenergyconsumption
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Capitalism—Chapter 1: the Next Industrial Revolution
    26476 01 p001-169 r4ah 9/10/99 5:49 PM Page 1 CHAPTER 1 1 2 3 The Next Industrial Revolution 4 5 Emerging possibilities — A new type of industrialism — The loss of 6 living systems — Valuing natural capital — The industrial mind-set — 7 The emerging pattern of scarcity — Four strategies of natural capital- 8 ism — Radical resource productivity — Putting the couch potato of industrialism on a diet — An economy of steady service and flow — 9 Restoring the basis of life and commerce 10 11 12 13 14 IMAGINE FOR A MOMENT A WORLD WHERE CITIES HAVE BECOME PEACEFUL 15 and serene because cars and buses are whisper quiet, vehicles exhaust 16 only water vapor, and parks and greenways have replaced unneeded 17 urban freeways. OPEC has ceased to function because the price of oil 18 has fallen to five dollars a barrel, but there are few buyers for it because 19 cheaper and better ways now exist to get the services people once 20 turned to oil to provide. Living standards for all people have dramati- 21 cally improved, particularly for the poor and those in developing coun- 22 tries. Involuntary unemployment no longer exists, and income taxes 23 have largely been eliminated. Houses, even low-income housing units, 24 can pay part of their mortgage costs by the energy they produce; there 25 are few if any active landfills; worldwide forest cover is increasing; dams 26 are being dismantled; atmospheric CO2 levels are decreasing for the 27 first time in two hundred years; and effluent water leaving factories is 28 cleaner than the water coming into them.
    [Show full text]