DOCSLIB.ORG

George C. Wallace Interviewer: John Stewart Date of Interview: May 25, 1967 Place of Interview: Montgomery, Alabama Length: 17 Pp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
George C. Wallace Interviewer: John Stewart Date of Interview: May 25, 1967 Place of Interview: Montgomery, Alabama Length: 17 Pp George C. Wallace Oral History Interview –JFK #1, 5/25/1967 Administrative Information Creator: George C. Wallace Interviewer: John Stewart Date of Interview: May 25, 1967 Place of Interview: Montgomery, Alabama Length: 17 pp. Biographical Note Wallace, George C.; Governor of Alabama, (1963-1967). Wallace discusses John F. Kennedy’s [JFK] Administration, his thoughts regarding JFK on a personal level, and his opinion on federal jurisdiction. He addresses civil rights, the integration of schools, and voting, among other issues. Access Restrictions No restrictions. Usage Restrictions According to the deed of gift signed November 4, 1969, copyright of these materials has been assigned to the United States Government. Users of these materials are advised to determine the copyright status of any document from which they wish to publish. Copyright The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excesses of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. The copyright law extends its protection to unpublished works from the moment of creation in a tangible form. Direct your questions concerning copyright to the reference staff. Transcript of Oral History Interview These electronic documents were created from transcripts available in the research room of the John F. Kennedy Library. The transcripts were scanned using optical character recognition and the resulting text files were proofread against the original transcripts. Some formatting changes were made. Page numbers are noted where they would have occurred at the bottoms of the pages of the original transcripts. If researchers have any concerns about accuracy, they are encouraged to visit the library and consult the transcripts and the interview recordings. Suggested Citation George C. Wallace, recorded interview by John Stewart, May 25, 1967, (page number), John F. Kennedy Oral History Program. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE Gift of Personal Statement By George C . Wallace to the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library In accordance with Sec. 507 of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (44 u.s.c. 397) and regulations issued thereunder (41 CFR 101- 10), I, George C . Wall ace, hereinafter referred to as the donor, hereby give, donate, and convey to the United States of America for eventual deposit in the proposed John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library, and for administration therein by the aut horities thereof, a tape and transcript of a personal statement approved by me and prepared for the purpose of deposit in the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library . The gift of this material is made subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Title to the material transferred hereunder will pass to the United States as of the date of the delivery of this materi al into the physical custody of the Archivist of the United States. 2. It is the donor's wish to make the material donated to the United States of America by the terms of the instrument available for research in the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library. At the same time, it is his wish to guard against the possibility of i ts contents being used to embarrass, damage, injure, or harass anyone. Therefore, in pursuance of this objective, and in accordance with the provisions of Sec. 507 (f) (3) of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949, as amended (44 U.S .C. 397) this material shall not, during the donor's lifetime be available for examination by anyone except persons who have received my express written authorization to examine it. This restriction shall apply to and include employees and officers of the General Services Administration (including the National Archives and Records Service and ~he John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library) engaged in performing normal archival work processes . -2- 3 . Title to all literary property rights will pass to the Unit ed St ates as of the date of the delivery of this material into the physical custody of the Archivist of the United States . 4 . A revision of this stipu lation governing access to the material for research may be entered into between the donor and t he Archivist of the United States, or his desig nee, if it appears desirable. 5 . The material donated to the United States pursuant to t he f oregoing shall be kept i ntact permanently in the John Fitzgerald Kennedy Library . Signed Date Accepted A chivist of the United States Date / J ((_M-b,,...,,1-c.,, ?i /~v <r George C. Wallace Table of Contents Page Topic 1 Democratic National Convention, Alabama delegation, 1956 1 John F. Kennedy’s [JFK] run for vice-president, 1956 2 Wallace’s thoughts on JFK’s run for president, 1960 3 Democratic National Convention, Alabama delegation, 1960 4 Wallace’s campaign for governor, 1962 4, 11, 16 JFK’s Administration 6 Civil rights 8, 14 Integration of schools 12 Voting rights Oral History I nte rview with GEORGE WALLACE May 25 , 1967 Montgomery, Al abama By John Stewar t For the John F. Kennedy Librar y STEWART : We r e you at the 1 956 Convention, a nd i f so, what were your reactions, if you recall, to the race that Senator Kennedy made for the vic e - presidential nominati on? WALLACE : I was a delegate in the 1 956 Convention and, as you probably recall, the majori ty of t he Alabama delegati o n voted for Senator Kennedy for the v ice pres i dential nominati on, as I believe all the state s of the South d i d with the exception of Tennessee and maybe a few votes in Florida and a few in Alabama that supported [Estes] Kefauver. I v oted on the f irst ballot for another candidate, and along wi th others we changed to Senator Kennedy because most of the Southern delegation did support him against t h e lat e Se nator Kefauver. I h ad t he p l easure o f meeting h i m on the mezzanine floor o f the La Salle Hotel by prearrangement because he had asked me to carry one o f his sisters t o the Alabama delegation to s peak in his behalf. He had to speak to a nother del egation at the same time our delegation was caucusing o r me eting . Mrs. [Eunice Kennedy] Shriver , I believe, wa s the sister of the then Senator Kennedy that I carried t o the Alabama delegati o n and presented. We did support the l ate Preside nt Kennedy in the Convention, that i s, the Alabama delegation did . - 2- - ~ STEWART: Do you recall if most of this support, and parti cularly your support of him, was more a pr o- Kennedy or an anti- Kefauver thing? WALLACE : Well , f r ankly, mos t of the support in the Southern delegations , although I cannot speak for the Southern delegati ons , was maybe against Senator Kefauver. However, Senator Kennedy's record and his association with members of the Congress from the South had been ver y pleasant, and he had many friends among the Southern members of the House and of the Senate . There was some pro­ Kennedy support . I think a lot of it was anti- Kefauver , but they had a high regard for Senator Kennedy also . STEWART : After the Convention, of course, he began to become a fairly active candidate for the nomi­ nati on in 1 960 . In 1959, t hen Governor [J ohn N.] Patterson endorsed Senator Kennedy as his candidate for the presidency. Do you recall what your feelings wer e in these year s , in ' 58 and ' 59? WALLACE : Well, I wasn ' t in a position of office holdi ng in 1959. I do r ecall that Governor Patterson did endorse Senator Kennedy . I had the p l easure of being with Senator Kennedy after that when he spoke to the Alabama League of Municipalit ies in Birmingham, I believe in 1 957 . I remember him c r acking the joke that had he been success ful in the 1956 Convention, it might have ended his pol itical career . It mi ght have been over . What he meant was that Mr . [Adlai E. ] Stevenson and Mr . Kefauver had been defeated. I had the pleasure of driving him back to the air­ port to catch his a i rpl ane a f ter the League of Municipali ties meeting. STEWART : Do you recal l if there was any discussion at that time of his future ambiti ons? WALLACE : I' m s ure ther e was. I just don't recall the con- versation . Ther e wer e thr ee or four of us in the automobile , and mainly we talked about the pleasure of having h i m in Alabama . He was very personabl e, as you know, .--, and he was a very lovabl e character in politics. In fact, I've always sai d , and said it befDre , that his famil y has been and is - 3- one of the most attr acti ve families in the country and one of the most attractive political families a l though I do not agree wi th all the philosophy of the Kennedys and of the late Presi­ dent .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Campaign 1968 Collection Inventory (**Materials in Bold Type Are Currently Available for Research)
    Campaign 1968 Collection Inventory (**Materials in bold type are currently available for research) Campaign. 1968. Appearance Files. (PPS 140) Box 1 (1 of 3) 1968, Sept. 7 – Pittsburgh. 1968, Sept. 8 – Washington, D.C. – B’nai B’rth. 1968, Sept. 11 – Durham, N.C. 1968, Sept. 11 – Durham, N.C. 1968, Sept. 12 – New Orleans, La. 1968, Sept. 12 – Indianapolis, Ind. 1968, Sept. 12 – Indianapolis, Ind. 1968, Sept. 13 – Cleveland, Ohio. 1968, Sept. 13 – Cleveland, Ohio. 1968, Sept. 14 – Des Moines, Ia. 1968, Sept. 14 – Santa Barbara, Calif. 1968, Sept. 16 – Yorba Linda, Calif. 1968, Sept. 16 – 17 – Anaheim, Calif. 1968, Sept. 16 – Anaheim, Calif. 1968, Sept. 18 – Fresno, Calif. 1968, Sept. 18 – Monterey, Calif. 1968, Sept. 19 – Salt Lake City, Utah. 1968, Sept. 19 – Peoria, Ill. 1968, Sept. 19 – Springfield, Mo. 1968, Sept. 19 – New York City. Box 2 1968, Sept. 20-21 – Philadelphia. 1968, Sept. 20-21 – Philadelphia. 1968, Sept. 21 – Motorcade : Philadelphia to Camden, N.J. 1968, Sept. 23 – Milwaukee, Wis. 1968, Sept. 24 – Sioux Falls, S.D. 1968, Sept. 24 – Bismarck, N.D. 1968, Sept. 24 – Boise, Idaho. 1968, Sept. 24 – Boise, Idaho. 1968, Sept. 24-25 – Seattle, Wash. 1968, Sept. 25 – Denver, Colo. 1968, Sept. 25 – Binghamton, N.Y. 1968, Sept. 26 – St. Louis, Mo. 1968, Sept. 26 – Louisville, Ky. 1968, Sept. 27 – Chattanooga, Tenn. 1968, Sept. 27 – Orlando, Fla. 1968, Sept. 27 – Tampa, Fla. Box 3 1968, Sept. 30-Oct. 1 – Detroit, Mich. 1968, Oct. 1 – Erie, Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. 1968, Oct. 1 – Williamsburg, Va. 1968, Oct. 3 – Atlanta, Ga. 1968, Oct. 4 – Spartenville, S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968: a Tumultuous Year
    Page 1 of 6 1968: A Tumultuous Year MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW Terms & Names An enemy attack in Vietnam, Disturbing events in 1968 •Tet offensive •Eugene McCarthy two assassinations, and a accentuated the nation’s •Clark Clifford •Hubert Humphrey chaotic political convention divisions, which are still healing •Robert Kennedy •George Wallace made 1968 an explosive year. in the 21st century. CALIFORNIA STANDARDS One American's Story 11.9.3 Trace the origins and geopolitical consequences (foreign and domestic) On June 5, 1968, John Lewis, the first chairman of of the Cold War and containment the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, policy, including the following: • The era of McCarthyism, instances fell to the floor and wept. Robert F. Kennedy, a lead- of domestic Communism (e.g., Alger ing Democratic candidate for president, had just Hiss) and blacklisting • The Truman Doctrine been fatally shot. Two months earlier, when Martin • The Berlin Blockade Luther King, Jr., had fallen victim to an assassin’s • The Korean War bullet, Lewis had told himself he still had Kennedy. • The Bay of Pigs invasion and the Cuban Missile Crisis And now they both were gone. Lewis, who later • Atomic testing in the American West, became a congressman from Georgia, recalled the the “mutual assured destruction” lasting impact of these assassinations. doctrine, and disarmament policies • The Vietnam War • Latin American policy A PERSONAL VOICE JOHN LEWIS REP 1 Students distinguish valid arguments from fallacious arguments “ There are people today who are afraid, in a sense, in historical interpretations. to hope or to have hope again, because of what HI 1 Students show the connections, happened in .
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Rights and the Primary Election of 1964 in Indiana: the Wallace Challenge* Matthew E
    Civil Rights and the Primary Election of 1964 in Indiana: The Wallace Challenge* Matthew E. Welsh** In the spring of 1964 Democratic Governor George Corley Wallace of Alabama announced that he was going to campaign for the presidency of the United States, opposing President Lyndon B. Johnson, also a Democrat. Wallace had become a national figure by defying the United States Supreme Court in refusing admission of Negro students to the University of Ala- bama, and his campaign for the Democratic presidential nomi- nation had obvious overtones of racial intolerance which I found most disturbing. Indiana had come a long way since the adoption of its Constitution of 1851, Article XI11 of which barred Negroes and mulattoes from entering the state. At that time blacks already living in the state, many of whom had been born here, were not regarded as citizens. They could neither vote nor hold public office. They could not serve on juries or in the militia, and they were barred from public schools.' Article XI11 was voided by the Indiana Supreme Court in 1866. The General Assembly authorized school integration in 1877, prohibited discrimination in enjoyment of public accommodations in 1885, and in 1963 created the Indiana Civil Rights Commission with broad pow- ers and an adequate budget.2 The record also disclosed, how- ever, that the statewide referendum in 1936 approving amend- ment of the Constitution to permit Negroes to be members of * This article is an account of the 1964 primary election in Indiana as experienced and remembered by one of the major participants in the campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • George Wallace on Segregation, 1964 Introduction Excerpt
    1 George Wallace on segregation, 1964 Introduction In 1958, George Wallace ran against John Patterson in his first gubernatorial race. In that Alabama election, Wallace refused to make race an issue, and he declined the endorsement of the Ku Klux Klan. This move won Wallace the support of the NAACP. Patterson, on the other hand, embraced Klan support, and he trounced Wallace in the election. In 1962 Wallace, having realized the power of race as a political tool, ran for governor again—this time as a proponent of segregation. He won by a landslide. In 1964, Wallace decided to make a run for the presidency as a Democratic candidate. The first Democratic primary was held in Wisconsin. Local politicians treated Wallace’s candidacy as a joke, but Wallace shocked his critics when he received 266,000 votes—one-third of the 780,000 votes cast. On April 8, one day after the Wisconsin primary, Michigan resident Ms. Martin wrote to Wallace asking him for literature on segregation. The sentiments expressed in Wallace’s reply stand in stark contrast to the reality of race relations in Alabama during his time as governor. Between the time of Wallace’s inauguration and his correspondence with Martin, Alabama had seen the bombings in Birmingham as well as Wallace’s face-off with federal forces over the integration of the University of Alabama. Despite growing conflict over race and civil rights, Wallace wrote Martin that “we have never had a problem in the South except in a few very isolated instances and these have been the result of outside agitators.” Wallace asserted that “I personally have done more for the Negroes of the State of Alabama than any other individual,” citing job creation and the salaries of black teachers in Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • Allen Rostron, the Law and Order Theme in Political and Popular Culture
    OCULREV Fall 2012 Rostron 323-395 (Do Not Delete) 12/17/2012 10:59 AM OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 37 FALL 2012 NUMBER 3 ARTICLES THE LAW AND ORDER THEME IN POLITICAL AND POPULAR CULTURE Allen Rostron I. INTRODUCTION “Law and order” became a potent theme in American politics in the 1960s. With that simple phrase, politicians evoked a litany of troubles plaguing the country, from street crime to racial unrest, urban riots, and unruly student protests. Calling for law and order became a shorthand way of expressing contempt for everything that was wrong with the modern permissive society and calling for a return to the discipline and values of the past. The law and order rallying cry also signified intense opposition to the Supreme Court’s expansion of the constitutional rights of accused criminals. In the eyes of law and order conservatives, judges needed to stop coddling criminals and letting them go free on legal technicalities. In 1968, Richard Nixon made himself the law and order candidate and won the White House, and his administration continued to trumpet the law and order theme and blame weak-kneed liberals, The William R. Jacques Constitutional Law Scholar and Professor of Law, University of Missouri–Kansas City School of Law. B.A. 1991, University of Virginia; J.D. 1994, Yale Law School. The UMKC Law Foundation generously supported the research and writing of this Article. 323 OCULREV Fall 2012 Rostron 323-395 (Do Not Delete) 12/17/2012 10:59 AM 324 Oklahoma City University Law Review [Vol. 37 particularly judges, for society’s ills.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REPUBLICAN PARTY's MARCH to the RIGHT Cliff Checs Ter
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 29 | Number 4 Article 13 2002 EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT Cliff checS ter Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Accounting Law Commons Recommended Citation Cliff cheS cter, EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT, 29 Fordham Urb. L.J. 1663 (2002). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol29/iss4/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT Cover Page Footnote Cliff cheS cter is a political consultant and public affairs writer. Cliff asw initially a frustrated Rockefeller Republican who now casts his lot with the New Democratic Movement of the Democratic Party. This article is available in Fordham Urban Law Journal: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol29/iss4/13 EXTREMELY MOTIVATED: THE REPUBLICAN PARTY'S MARCH TO THE RIGHT by Cliff Schecter* 1. STILL A ROCK PARTY In the 2000 film The Contender, Senator Lane Hanson, por- trayed by Joan Allen, explains what catalyzed her switch from the Grand Old Party ("GOP") to the Democratic side of the aisle. During her dramatic Senate confirmation hearing for vice-presi- dent, she laments that "The Republican Party had shifted from the ideals I cherished in my youth." She lists those cherished ideals as "a woman's right to choose, taking guns out of every home, campaign finance reform, and the separation of church and state." Although this statement reflects Hollywood's usual penchant for oversimplification, her point con- cerning the recession of moderation in Republican ranks is still ap- ropos.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Presidential Primary
    Michigan Presidential Primary Facts and Statistics Michigan Department of State Bureau of Elections February 2019 MICHIGAN PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY LEGISLATIVE HISTORY 1912 The legislature enacted Public Act 9 to direct that a presidential preference primary be conducted in the month of April. 1931 The legislature enacted Public Act 200 to repeal the presidential preference primary. 1972 The legislature enacted Public Act 60 to reestablish the presidential primary subject to the following provisions: • Primary would be held on the third Tuesday in May in presidential election years for each political party that received greater than 5% of the total vote cast nationwide in the last presidential election. • The Secretary of State would issue a list of individuals generally advocated by the national news media as potential candidates for president. The law also provided that the state political party chairpersons could provide the Secretary of State with a list of individuals whom they consider to be potential presidential nominees for their political party. The Secretary of State was then required to notify each candidate appearing on the lists who in turn was required to file an affidavit indicating his or her political party preference and willingness to have his or her name appear on the ballot. Individuals whose names did not appear on either the Secretary of State’s or a political party list could qualify as a candidate by filing nominating petitions. The petitions were required to be signed by registered electors equal to at least ½ of 1% of the total vote cast in the previous presidential election for the presidential candidate of the political party of the individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Amending the Name of The
    Resolution Amending the Name of the George C. Wallace Building at the University of Alabama at Birmingham WHEREAS, diversity, inclusion, and respect are fundamental values of the University of Alabama System; WHEREAS, under Board Rule 411, the Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama (“Board of Trustees”) has the exclusive discretion to amend, remove, or withdraw any naming at any time and for any reason; and WHEREAS, on June 8, 2020, the President Pro Tempore of the Board of Trustees appointed a working group of Trustees to conduct a comprehensive review of the names of buildings, structures, and spaces on all UA System campuses; and WHEREAS, the working group’s review is governed by the institutional best interests of the University of Alabama System, recognizing that although no person is infallible and widespread views commonly change over time, the Board of Trustees must take great care to demonstrate and honor the current values of the University of Alabama System; and WHEREAS, the working group’s initial inquiry is to determine whether an individual after whom a building, structure, or space is named made any substantial, lasting, and unique contributions to the University of Alabama System; and WHEREAS, if the working group concludes that an individual made substantial, lasting, and unique contributions, the working group will then weigh those contributions against any actions the individual took, or views the individual had, that are inconsistent with the current values of the University of Alabama System, taking into consideration
    [Show full text]
  • NPRC) VIP List, 2009
    Description of document: National Archives National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) VIP list, 2009 Requested date: December 2007 Released date: March 2008 Posted date: 04-January-2010 Source of document: National Personnel Records Center Military Personnel Records 9700 Page Avenue St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 Note: NPRC staff has compiled a list of prominent persons whose military records files they hold. They call this their VIP Listing. You can ask for a copy of any of these files simply by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request to the address above. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
    [Show full text]
  • Wallace Trails Nixon by Largest Margin
    The Harris Survey For Release: Friday May 19, 1972 - SPECIAL BONUS COLUMN WALLACE TRAILS NIXON BY LARGEST MARGIN BY LOUIS HARRIS If Gov. George Wallace of Alabama were to become the Democratic par? nominee for Presi- dent, he would presently trail President Nixon by 59-24 percent 2:; a two-way contest, by far the largest margin behind among the current leaders In the Democratic delegate count. In a three-way race, matched against Mr. Nixon and former Sen. Eugene McCarthy on an inde- pendent ticket, the Alabama Governor receives only 21 percent of the vote, trailing McCarthyls 22 percent, and 26 points behind the President's 47 percent. The commanding political fact zbout the Wallace candidacy.1~that he appears to have attracted between 16 and 25 percent of the electorate as hard-core supporters, but at the same time he has also firmed up close to 75 percent of the voters in solid opposition to his becoming President. Two months before the Democratic convention he does not shape up as a viable candidate for the White House, either on a major-party or independent ticket. By the same token, he is capable of amassing a substantial minority of the vote, which shows to best advantage as a symbol of protest among a large field in the Presidential primaEies. The trend to watch in the weeks ahead will be George !+allace's threat as a "spoiler, depending on the match- rlps which emergc ?ram thc zajor-i;,~-Ly nuiuinalirlg conventions. On May 9th and loth, the Harris Survey visited approximately 2,250 households and surveyed a sample of 1,385 likely voters 18 years and over.
    [Show full text]
  • Gryskiewicz MA Thesis Formatted.Pdf
    1 Williams v. Rhodes: How One Candidate, One State, One Week, and One Justice Shaped Ballot Access Law INTRODUCTION In 1968, the Supreme Court broached a new field of constitutional law when it decided Williams v. Rhodes. Faced with popular Alabama Governor George Wallace’s challenge to Ohio’s complex and restrictive ballot access laws, the Court ordered him onto the ballot. The opinion’s rationales had far-reaching implications and produced complicated jurisprudence. It was a signpost to nowhere, and the Court has been trying to find the right direction since, attempting to massage coherence into its ballot access jurisprudence by employing different rationales and scrutiny levels. This Note describes and explains the political, historical, and legal factors impacting the Williams decision. Since Williams, the Court has used the Equal Protection Clause and the First Amendment; strict, intermediate, and rational basis scrutiny; a balancing test; and a system incorporating all of this accumulated flotsam less the Equal Protection Clause. This jurisprudence has left unclear instructions to lower courts. The Court should remedy this confusion by picking a single standard with prudent legal rationales and sound historical bases. The political environment of 1968 and Ohio’s anti-democratic legal framework compelled the Justices to place Governor Wallace on the Ohio ballot. Wallace’s campaign represented a national movement. Denying his supporters the chance to vote for him would have been political folly, and Ohio’s laws kept all but the Democratic and Republican parties from the ballot, which forced the Court’s hand on the issue. But the Court’s first foray into the field of ballot access law created a jurisprudential obstacle course that the Court has contorted its way through since 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • Scranton, Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, October 7, 1968
    NEWS FROM: DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE 2600 Virginia Avenue Washington, De C. 20037 202-333-8750 Release for Tuesday AMs For Further Information: October 8, 1968 Ev Munsey, Ext. 201 D6-571 SILENT, EVASIVE, VACATIONING NIXON TAKES AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR GRANTED, HUMPHREY SAYS Scranton, Pa., October 7 --Hubert H. Humphrey today assailed Nixon· for his silence on key issues, his feeble statement against George Wallace, his secret messages to special interests, and extensive vacationing in the midst of the campaign. The confident Republican candidate '~as taken the American people for granted," Humphrey said. ./ ' The Democratic nominee acknowledged that his ticket is running behind. ''But we are moving up fast," he said. Humphrey pointed up the differ~ng approaches of the two candidates to Wallace and his appeal to hate and fear. "I •,_re gone to the South and said what I thought about Mr. Wallace and his campaign of extremism and feare Mr. Nixon thought he could tip-toe through this issue, too. He wasn't planning to criticize George Wallace and his frightening campaign of fear and hate. He planned only to tell Southern voters not to throw their votes away on Mr. Wallace. "But we changed all that. We forced Mr o Nixon finally to say something. And in a rare burst of courage, he finally said he didn't really think a man who would run over people in his car should be President." ''That's Mr. Nixon's profile in courage, and a mighty weak profile it is," Humphrey said. The Democratic nominee said Nixon's silence is also explained by the fact that "outside of his early Congressional campaigns of smear and distortion, Mr.
    [Show full text]