PHOTON COUNTING Using Photomultiplier Tubes INTRODUCTION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PHOTON COUNTING Using Photomultiplier Tubes INTRODUCTION TECHNICAL INFORMATION MAY. 1998 PHOTON COUNTING Using Photomultiplier Tubes INTRODUCTION Recently, non-destructive and non-invasive measurement using light is becoming more and more popular in diverse fields including biological, chemical, medical, material analysis, industrial instruments and home appliances. Technologies for detecting low level light are receiving par- ticular attention since they are effective in allowing high precision and high sensitivity measurements without changing the properties of the objects. Biological and biochemical examinations, for example, use low-light-level measurement for cell qualitative and quanlitative by detecting fluorescence emitted from cells labeled with a fluorescent dye. In clinical testing and medi- cal diagnosis, techniques such as in-vitro assay and im- munoassay have become essential for blood analysis, blood cell counting, hormone inspection and diagnosis of cancer and various infectious diseases. These techniques also involve low-light-level measurement such as colorim- etry, absorption spectroscopy, fluorescence photometry, and detection of light scattering or Iuminescence measure- ment. In RIA (radioimmunoassay) which has been used in immunological examinations using radioisotopes, radia- tion emitted from a sample is converted into low level light which must be measured with high sensitivity. In addition, fluorescence and Iuminescence measurements are used for rapid hygienic testing and monitoring processes in in- spections for bacteria contamination in water or in food processing. Photomultiplier tubes, photodiodes and CCD image sen- sors are widely used as “eyes” for detecting low level light. These detectors convert light into analog electrical sig- nals (current or voltage) in most applications. However, when the light level becomes extremely low so that the incident photons are detected as separate pulses, the single photon counting method using a photomultiplier tube is very effective if the average time intervals between sig- nal pulses are sufficiently wider than the time resolution of the photomultiplier tube. This photon counting method is superior to analog signal measurement in terms of stabil- ity, detection efficiency and signal-to-noise ratio. This technical manual explains how to use photomultiplier tubes in photon counting to perform low-light-level mea- surement with high sensitivity and high accuracy. This manual also describes the principle of photon counting, its key points and operating circuit configuration, as well as characteristics of photomultiplier tubes and their selec- tion guide. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Photon Counting ? ............................................................. 2 1-1 Analog Mode and Digital Mode (Photon Counting Mode) 1-2 The Principle of Photon Counting 2. Operation and Characteristics of Photon Counting ........ 5 2-1 Photon Counter and Multichannel Pulse Height Analyzer (MCA) 2-2 Basic Characteristics in Photon Counting (1) Pulse Height Distribution (PHD) and Plateau Characteristics (2) Output Instability vs. Variations in Photomultiplier Tube Gain (current amplification) (3) Linearity of Count Rate 3. Characteristics of Photomultiplier Tubes ......................... 9 3-1 Spectral Response (Quantum Efficiency:QE) 3-2 Collection Efficiency (CE) 3-3 Supply Voltage and Gain 3-4 Noise 3-5 Magnetic Shield 3-6 Stability and Dark Storage 3-7 Uniformity 3-8 Signal-to-Noise (S/N) Ratio 4. Measurement Systems ....................................................... 16 4-1 Synchronous Photon Counting Using Chopper 4-2 Time-Resolved Photon Counting by Repetitive Sampling 4-3 Time-Resolved Photon Counting by Multiple Gates 4-4 Time-Correlated Photon Counting (TCPC) 5. Selection Guide ................................................................... 18 5-1 Selecting the Photomultiplier Tube 5-2 Photomultiplier Tubes for Photon Counting 5-3 Related Products 1. Photon Counting ? Figure 1 : Output Pulses from Photomultiplier Tube at Different Light Levels TPHOC0027EA HIGHER LIGHT LEVEL (Multi Photoelectron State) 1-1 Analog Mode and Digital Mode ARRIVAL OF PHOTONS (Photon Counting Mode) PHOTOELECTRON EMISSION A photomultiplier tube (PMT) consists of a photocathode, SIGNAL OUTPUT (PULSE) an electron multiplier (composed of several dynodes) and an anode. (See Figure 2 for schematic construction.) When SIGNAL OUTPUT (DC) light enters the photocathode of a photomultiplier tube, TIME photoelectrons are emitted from the photocathode. These LOWER LIGHT LEVEL (Single Photoelectron State) photoelectrons are multiplied by secondary electron emis- ARRIVAL OF PHOTONS sion through the dynodes and then collected by the an- ode as an output pulse. In usual applications, these out- PHOTOELECTRON EMISSION put pulses are not handled as individual pulses but dealt with as an analog current created by a multitude of pulses SIGNAL OUTPUT (so-called analog mode). In this case, a number of pho- TIME tons are incident on the photomultiplier tube per unit time as in of Figure 1 and the resulting photoelectrons are emitted from the photocathode as in . The photoelec- 1-2 The Principle of Photon trons multiplied by the dynodes are then derived from the anode as output pulses as in . At this point, when the Counting pulse-to-pulse interval is narrower than each pulse width or the signal processing circuit is not fast enough, the ac- One important factor in photon counting is the quantum tual output pulses overlap each other and become a di- efficiency (QE). It is the production probability of photo- rect current with shot noise fluctuations as shown in. electrons being emitted when one photon strikes the pho- In contrast, when the light intensity becomes so low that tocathode. In a single photoelectron state, the number of the incident photons are separated as shown in, the out- emitted photoelectrons (primary electrons) per photon is put pulses obtained from the anode are also discrete. This only 1 or 0. Therefore QE refers to the ratio of the average condition is called a single photoelectron state. The num- number of emitted electrons from the photocathode per ber of output pulses is in direct proportion to the amount unit time to the average number of photons incident on of incident light and this pulse counting method has ad- the photocathode. vantages in signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio and stability over the analog mode in which an average of all the pulses is Figure 2 : Photomultiplier Tube Operation made. in Single Photoelectron State This pulse counting technique is known as the photon PHOTOCATHODE 1ST DYNODE counting method. Since the detected pulses undergo bi- ANODE nary processing for digital counting, the photon counting P method is also referred to as the digital mode. PULSE HEIGHT SINGLE PHOTON Dy1 Dy2 Dyn-1 Dyn ELECTRON GROUP TPMOC0048EB 2 Photoelectrons emitted from the photocathode are accel- Figure 3 : Photomultiplier Tube Output and PHD erated and focused onto the first dynode (Dy1) to produce secondary electrons. However, some of these electrons do not strike the Dy1 or deviate from their normal trajecto- LOW COUNT FREQUENCY ries, so they are not multiplied properly. This efficiency of LOW COUNT FREQUENCY HIGH COUNT FREQUENCY collecting photoelectrons is referred to as the collection efficiency (CE). In addition, the ratio of the count value (the number of output pulses) to the number of incident photons is called the detection efficiency or counting effi- PULSE HEIGHT ciency, and is expressed by the following equation : COUNTS AT EACH Detection efficiency(%) =(Nd/Np) × 100(%) = η × α × 100(%) where Nd is the count value, Np is the number of incident photons, η is the photocathode QE and α is the CE. Al- though discussed later, detection efficiency also depends TIME on the threshold level that brings the output pulses into a binary signal. Since the number of secondary electrons emitted from the Dy1 varies from several to about 20 in response to one primary electron from the photocathode, PULSE HEIGHTS (CHARGES) TPMOC0049EB they can be treated by Poisson distribution, and the aver- age number of electrons becomes the secondary electoron δ emission ratio . This holds true for multiplication processes Photomultiplier Tube Output in Single in the subsequent dynodes. Accordingly, for a photomulti- Photoelectron State plier tube having n stages of dynodes, a single photoelec- The output signal from a photomultiplier tube in the pho- tron from the photocathode is multiplied by δ n to create a ton counting mode can be calculated as follows: group of electrons and is derived from the anode as an In the photon counting mode, a single photoelectron e- output pulse. In this process, the height of each output (electron charge 1.6 × 10-19 coulombs) is emitted from pulse obtained at the anode depends on fluctuations in the photocathode. If the photomultiplier tube gain µ is 5 the secondary electron multiplication ratio stated above, × 106, then the anode output charge is given by so that it differs from pulse to pulse. (Figure 3) e × µ = 1.6 × 10-19 × 5 × 106 (coulombs:C) Other reasons why the output pulse height becomes un- = 8 × 10-13 (C) equal are that gain varies with the position on each dyn- Here, if the pulse width t (FWHM) of the anode output ode and some deviated electrons do not contribute to the signal is 10ns, then the output pulse peak current Ip is normal multiplication process. Figure 3 shows a histogram Ip = e × µ × 1/t (A) of the anode pulse heights. This graph is known as the = (8 × 10-13)/(10 × 10-9) pulse height distribution (PHD).
Recommended publications
  • SI Traceable Solar Spectral Irradiance Measurement Based on a Quantum Benchmark: a Prototype Design
    remote sensing Article SI Traceable Solar Spectral Irradiance Measurement Based on a Quantum Benchmark: A Prototype Design Xiaobing Zheng *, Maopeng Xia, Wenchao Zhai, Youbo Hu, Jianjun Li, Yinlin Yuan and Weiwei Pang Key Laboratory of Optical Calibration and Characterization, Anhui Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei, Anhui 230031, China; [email protected] (M.X.); [email protected] (W.Z.); [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (W.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 1 March 2020; Accepted: 29 April 2020; Published: 4 May 2020 Abstract: We propose a space benchmark sensor with onboard SI (Système International) traceability by means of quantum optical radiometry. Correlated photon pairs generated by spontaneous parametric down-conversion (SPDC) in nonlinear crystals are used to calibrate the absolute responsivity of a solar observing radiometer. The calibration is systematic, insensitive to degradation and independent of external radiometric standards. Solar spectral irradiance at 380–2500 nm is traceable to the photon rate and Planck’s constant with an expected uncertainty of about 0.35%. The principle of SPDC calibration and a prototype design of the solar radiometer are introduced. The uncertainty budget is analyzed in consideration of errors arising from calibration and observation modes. Keywords: radiometric benchmark; spontaneous parametric down-conversion; correlated photons; detector calibration; solar irradiance 1. Introduction Space radiometric benchmarks were proposed in recent years to reveal the trend of climate change and evaluate the energy budget of the Earth system with high confidence [1–4].
    [Show full text]
  • B2,3,8,X26093 Page 1 of 9 IAC-14-B2,3,8,X26093 IMPLICATIONS of SKY RADIANCE on DEEP-SPACE OPTICAL COMMUNICATION LINKS Ke
    65th International Astronautical Congress, Toronto, Canada. Copyright ©2014 by the International Astronautical Federation. All rights reserved. IAC-14-B2,3,8,x26093 IMPLICATIONS OF SKY RADIANCE ON DEEP-SPACE OPTICAL COMMUNICATION LINKS Kevin Shortt German Aerospace Center, Germany, [email protected] Dirk Giggenbach German Aerospace Center, Germany, [email protected] Thomas Dreischer RUAG Schweiz AG, Switzerland, [email protected] Carlos Rivera ISDEFE, Spain, [email protected] Robert Daddato, Andrea Di Mira, Igor Zayer European Space Agency, Germany [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] As the number of deep-space missions that are turning to optical communications to support science operations increases, system designers are taking a more in depth look at the link budgets that govern such links. Noise sources, such as the radiance arising from scattering in the Earth’s atmosphere and light reflected from planetary bodies in close visual proximity to spacecraft, become particularly critical given the photon-starved channels normally associated with deep-space links. In the case of the Earth’s atmosphere, sky radiance becomes a significant factor when considering daytime operations especially when operators need to support spacecraft contacts close to the Sun. This paper encapsulates the implications of sky radiance on deep-space optical communication scenarios and provides an overview of the current efforts underway in Europe to further quantify its impact on future mission operations. I. INTRODUCTION In the European context, this research is particularly timely given that the European Space Agency, as well Photons received as a result of sky radiance have a as other European players, have set their sights on a major impact on optical communication links to deep- number of deep-space missions in the coming years.
    [Show full text]
  • TOPICAL REVIEW Quantum Radiometry Sergey V
    Journal of Modern Optics Vol. 56, No. 9, 20 May 2009, 1045–1052 TOPICAL REVIEW Quantum radiometry Sergey V. Polyakova,b and Alan L. Migdalla,b* aOptical Technology Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8441, USA; bJoint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA (Received 1 March 2009; final version received 21 March 2009) We review radiometric techniques that take advantage of photon counting and stem from the quantum laws of nature. We present a brief history of metrological experiments and review the current state of experimental quantum radiometry. Keywords: single photon detector; metrology; high accuracy measurement; parametric downconversion Conventionally defined, radiometry is the field that photon-pair sources and single-photon or photon- studies the measurement of electromagnetic radiation number-resolving photodetectors. As such, these mea- in terms of its power, spectral characteristics, and other surements are based on quantum mechanical laws parameters. The term applies to electromagnetic radi- that guarantee certain properties of photon statistics ation characterization in a wavelength range from and rely on our ability to reliably detect single photons. nanometers to tens of microns and at all optical power Ideally, the accuracy of measurements based on levels. Because radiometry is defined so broadly, a wide photon counting scales as 1=N1=2, where N is the variety of measurement devices, or radiometers, with number of detected photons. Therefore, to match the a variety of physical characteristics are used. It is state-of-the-art accuracy of conventional radiometry therefore necessary to maintain a common scale for one needs to collect 4108 single photon detections.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Applications of Liquid Scintillation Counting
    Principles and Applications of Liquid Scintillation Counting A PRIMER FOR ORIENTATION – National Diagnostics Laboratory Staff Principles 1.1 RADIOACTIVE EMISSIONS 1.2 MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION AND ISOTOPE QUANTITATION 1.3 MECHANISM OF LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING 1.4 LIQUID SCINTILLATION SIGNAL INTERPRETATION 1.5 THE COMPLETE SCINTILLATION COCKTAIL 1.6 CHEMILUMINESCENCE AND STATIC ELECTRICITY 1.7 WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES Applications 2.1 COUNTING DISCRETE SAMPLES 2.2 SPECIAL SAMPLE PREPARATION PROTOCOLS 2.3 FLOW LIQUID SCINTILLATION 2.4 LIQUID SCINTILLATION AND RADIATION SAFETY USA: 1-800-526-3867 © 2004 National Diagnostics EUROPE: 441 482 646022 LSC Concepts - Fundamentals of Liquid Scintillation Counting Fundamentals of Liquid 1 Scintillation Counting 1.1 RADIOACTIVE EMISSIONS 1.4 LIQUID SCINTILLATION SIGNAL Types of Radioactive Emission / Characteristics of INTERPRETATION Useful Isotopes / Use of Isotopes in Research Patterns of Light Emission / Pulse Analysis / Counting Efficiency / Quenching 1.2 MEASUREMENT OF RADIATION AND ISOTOPE QUANTITATION 1.5 THE COMPLETE SCINTILLATION Ionization Detection / Scintillation Detection COCKTAIL 1.3 MECHANISM OF LIQUID 1.6 CHEMILUMINESCENCE AND SCINTILLATION COUNTING STATIC ELECTRICITY The Role of the Solvent / The Role of Phosphors (Scintillators) 1.7 WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES Liquid Scintillation Counting...Making Light of the Situation he chemical properties of an element are determined by its atomic number - the number of protons in the nucleus (and electrons within neutral atoms of that element). Uncharged neutrons, within the nucleus along Twith protons, do not contribute to the atomic number, but will alter the atomic mass. This makes possible the existence of isotopes, which are atoms of the same element with different atomic weight. Most isotopes are stable, and do not undergo any spontaneous nuclear changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Scintillator Based Color X-Ray Photon Counting Imager Stijn Vandewiele1,4, Bart Dierickx1,2, Benoit Dupont1,3, Arnaud Defernez1, Dirk Uwaerts1
    Scintillator based color X-ray photon counting imager Stijn Vandewiele1,4, Bart Dierickx1,2, Benoit Dupont1,3, Arnaud Defernez1, Dirk Uwaerts1 1Caeleste, Antwerp, Belgium, 2V.U.B., Brussels, Belgium, 3Université Paris XIII, France, 4University of Ghent, Belgium With the ubiquitus usage of radiography in many medical diagnosis, the urge to achieve the lowest possible radiation dose is a driving force for the X-ray image sensor community. The ultimate signal to noise ratio that one can theoretically achieve is the quantum limit, where each and every photon reaching the imager is counted. Additionally, photon counting comes with abenefit: the possibility to sort incoming X-ray photons based on their energy, thus achieving “color X-ray”, a real added value for the diagnostician. As shown in [1], from electronics standpoint state-of-the-art photon counting pixels [2,3,4] use direct detection, whereby the X-ray to charge conversion happens by the photo- electric effect in a high-Z semiconductor photoconductor or photodiode. From X-ray source From X-ray source Heavy element Heavy element scintillator photodiode or Visible photoresistor light Bump bonds Optical glue flash ROIC ROIC wafer wafer thickness 5000...20000 e- 100…500 e- charge packet charge packet Figure 1 Direct (left) vs indirect (center) X-photon detection technics, detector prototype(right) In direct detection material, an X-ray photon with a typical energy for medical imaging produces about 5000 to 20000 electrons. Photon counting imagers based on direct detection materials have been used in scientific and medical imagers. However manufacturing of such detector in large scale, compatible with applications such as Chest Xray or Mammography faces several challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Radiation Detection and Measurement
    7 Radiation Detection and Measurement 7.1 Radiation Detectors Radiation is detected using special systems which measure the amount or number of ionizations or excitation events that occur within the detector’s sensitive volume. A radiation detection system can be either passive or active, depending upon the device and the mechanism used to determine the number of ionizations. Passive devices are usually processed at a special processing facility before the amount of radiation exposure can be reported. Examples of passive devices are radiation dosimeters used in determining individual radiation exposure and radon detectors. Active devices provide an immediate indication of the amount of radiation or radioactivity present and consist primarily of portable radiation survey meters and laboratory counting devices. Table 7-9 located at the end of this chapter (and the manual’s end page), lists expected efficiencies for commonly encountered radioisotopes using different types of survey instruments. 7.2 Radiation Dosimeters It would be quite impractical to follow each worker around with a radiation survey meter to try to keep track of the radiation exposure fields they enter because: (a) very likely the dose rates will vary considerably over time depending upon the procedures performed, and (b) the workers usually move around from one radiation level to another during the course of their work. To overcome these problems, the Safety Department monitors a radiation worker's external radiation exposure with a personal dosimeter or radiation badge. These devices essentially store-up the radiation energy over the period it is used and is then sent to a vendor to read the exposure and report the results.
    [Show full text]
  • Contamination Monitoring Part A
    Contamination Monitoring Radiation Safety Orientation Open Source Booklet 4 (June 1, 2018) For more information, refer to the Radiation Safety Manual, 2017, RSP-3, Section 10 and the Quick Step Guide for Contamination Monitoring in Radiation Safety Records Binder After work with radioactive material, it is important to confirm the work area is free of radioactive contamination…. Contamination Monitoring has been separated into three parts: • Part A: The Basics of Contamination Monitoring What everyone needs to know! • Part B: Liquid Scintillation Counting Everyone needs to know in order to complete the “Liquid Scintillation Counting Practical Activity” in your own lab with a local LRS or arranged with an EHS mentor. • Part C: Contamination Meter/Surveying for Radioactive Contamination Read before attending in-lab Radiation Safety Workshop. During the radiation safety workshop, you will complete the “Contamination Meter/Surveying for Radioactive Contamination Practical Activity”. Part A: The Basics of Contamination monitoring What everyone needs to know Why is Contamination Monitoring required? The purpose of contamination monitoring is to ensure that levels of radioactive contamination do not exceed legal limits in order to protect: • Staff, students, the public and the environment and • The reliability of experimental results When you find contamination, you must take action! Decontamination and re-monitoring is required. What is Radioactive Contamination? Radioactive Contamination is the presence of radioactive materials in any place where it is not desired, in particular where its presence may be harmful. Contamination may present a risk to a person’s health or the environment. Contamination has also been determined to be the cause of failed experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Photomultiplier Tubes
    CHAPTER 6 PHOTON COUNTING 1) 2) 4) - 12) Photon counting is an effective technique used to detect very-low- level-light such as Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence analysis, and chemical or biological luminescence analysis where the absolute mag- nitude of the light is extremely low. This section describes the prin- ciples of photon counting, its operating methods, detection capabili- ties, and advantages as welll as typical characteristics of photomulti- plier tubes designed for photon counting. © 2007 HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K. K. 126 CHAPTER 6 PHOTON COUNTING 6.1 Analog and Digital (Photon Counting) Modes The methods of processing the output signal of a photomultiplier tube can be broadly divided into analog and digital modes, depending on the incident light intensity and the bandwidth of the output processing cir- cuit. As Figure 6-1 shows, when light strikes the photocathode of a photomultiplier tube, photoelectrons are emitted. These photoelectrons are multiplied by the cascade process of secondary emission through the dyn- odes (normally 106 to 107 times) and finally reach the anode connected to an output processing circuit. PHOTO- CATHODE FIRST DYNODE ANODE P PULSE HEIGHT SINGLE PHOTON Dy1 Dy2 Dy-1 Dyn ELECTRON GROUP THBV3_0601 Figure 6-1: Photomultiplier tube operation in photon counting mode When observing the output signal of a photomultiplier tube with an oscilloscope while varying the incident light level, output pulses like those shown in Figure 6-2 are seen. At higher light levels, the output pulse intervals are narrow so that they overlap each other, producing an analog waveform (similar to (a) and (b) of Figure 6-2).
    [Show full text]
  • Photon Counting X-Ray Detector Systems
    Thesis for the degree of Licentiate Sundsvall 2005 Photon Counting X-ray Detector Systems Börje Norlin Supervisors: Docent Christer Fröjdh Professor Hans-Erik Nilsson Electronics Design Division, in the Department of Information Technology and Media Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1652-8948 Mid Sweden University Licentiate Thesis 2 ISBN 91-85317-01-2 Akademisk avhandling som med tillstånd av Mittuniversitetet i Sundsvall framläggs till offentlig granskning för avläggande av licentiatexamen i elektronik fredagen den 11 februari 2005, klockan 10.15 i sal M102, Mittuniversitetet Sundsvall. Seminariet kommer att hållas på engelska. Photon Counting X-ray Detector Systems Börje Norlin © Börje Norlin, 2005 Electronics Design Division, in the Department of Information Technology and Media Mid Sweden University, SE-851 70 Sundsvall Sweden Telephone: +46 (0)60 148594 Printed by Kopieringen Mittuniversitetet, Sundsvall, Sweden, 2005 To my wife Monica! …my rose from Mid Sweden. ABSTRACT This licentiate thesis concerns the development and characterisation of X-ray imaging detector systems. “Colour” X-ray imaging opens up new perspectives within the fields of medical X-ray diagnosis and also in industrial X-ray quality control. The difference in absorption for different “colours” can be used to discern materials in the object. For instance, this information might be used to identify diseases such as brittle-bone disease. The “colour” of the X-rays can be identified if the detector system can process each X-ray photon individually. Such a detector system is called a “single photon processing” system or, less precise, a “photon counting system”. With modern technology it is possible to construct photon counting detector systems that can resolve details to a level of approximately 50 µm.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Protection Training Manual & Study Guide
    Radiation Protection Training Manual & Study Guide Jump to the Table of Contents December 1986 Revised 1994 Radiation Safety Office Radiation Protection Training Course Course Outline Time Lecture Topic Reference Material 20 Min Introduction Radiation Safety Manual and ESSR RSO Procedures 1 Hour Fundamental Radiation Concepts Study Guide Chapter I The Radioactive Atom Problem Set 1 Radioactive Decay Modes Radioactive Decay Equation Radioactive Units Interactions of Radiation with Matter Demonstration: Inverse Square Law, Penetrability of Radiation 1 Hour Radiation Instrumentation Study Guide Chapter 2 Portable Survey Instruments Problem Set2 Use of Radiation Survey Instruments Calibrations and Efficiency Liquid Scintillation Counting Statistics of Counting Demonstration: GM, Ion Chamber, Alpha Proportional Survey Instruments 1 Hour Source and Effects of Radiation Study Guide Chapter 3 Biological Effects of Radiation Problem Set 3 Radiation Exposure Limits Radiation from Background, Medical and Consumer Products Demonstration: Radioactive Material in Consumer Products 3 Radiation Protection and Laboratory Study Guide Hours Techniques Chapter 4 Problem Set 4 External Radiation Protection Internal Radiation Protection Protective Clothing Workplace Manipulations of Radioactive Materials Emergency Procedures Radioactive Waste Disposal Contamination Surveys Radioactive Contamination Limits Decontamination Procedures Video Tape: Laboratory Techniques and Emergency Procedures 2 Radiation Protection Program Study Guide Hours Chapter 5 Rules and Regulations Applicable UMD Directives Course Review Course Evaluation Examination Video Tape: Radiation Safety Table of Contents Introduction Chapter I Fundamental Radiation Concepts 1. The Radioactive Atom 2. Radioactive Decay Modes A. Beta Decay B. Positron Decay C. Electron Capture D. Alpha Decay E. Nuclear Transition 3. The Radioactive Decay Equation 4. Radioactivity Units 5. Interactions of Radiations with Matter A.
    [Show full text]
  • PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES Basics and Applications
    PHOTOMULTIPLIER TUBES Basics and Applications THIRD EDITION PHOTON IS OUR BUSINESS ▲ Photomultiplier Tubes ▲ Photomultiplier Tube Modules Introduction Light detection technolgy is a powerful tool that provides deeper understanding of more sophisticated phenomena. Measurement using light offers unique advantages: for example, nondestructive analysis of a substance, high-speed properties and extremely high detectability. Recently, in particular, such advanced fields as scientific measurement, medical diagnosis and treatment, high energy physics, spectroscopy and biotech- nology require development of photodetectors that exhibit the ultimate in various performance parameters. Photodetectors or light sensors can be broadly divided by their operating principle into three major catego- ries: external photoelectric effect, internal photoelectric effect and thermal types. The external photoelectric effect is a phenomenon in which when light strikes a metal or semiconductor placed in a vacuum, electrons are emitted from its surface into the vacuum. Photomultiplier tubes (often abbreviated as PMT) make use of this external photoelectric effect and are superior in response speed and sensitivity (low-light-level detection). They are widely used in medical equipment, analytical instruments and industrial measurement systems. Light sensors utilizing the internal photoelectric effect are further divided into photoconductive types and photovoltaic types. Photoconductive cells represent the former, and PIN photodiodes the latter. Both types feature high sensitivity and miniature size, making them well suited for use as sensors in camera exposure meters, optical disk pickups and in optical communications. The thermal types, though their sensitivity is low, have no wavelength-dependence and are therefore used as temperature sensors in fire alarms, intrusion alarms, etc. This handbook has been structured as a technical handbook for photomultiplier tubes in order to provide the reader with comprehensive information on photomultiplier tubes.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiometry from Watts to Single-Photons
    Bridging the Gap: Radiometry from Watts to Single-Photons A. Migdall B. Calkins D. Livigni C. Cromer R. P. Mirin M. Dowell S. W. Nam J. Fan S. V. Polyakov T. Gerrits M. Stevens J. Lehman N. Tomlin A. Lita I. Vayshenker NIST, Boulder & Gaithersburg NEWRAD Maui, HI Sept. 22, 2011 Outline • Existing Radiometry and The Gap (What this talk is and is not about) • Bridging the Gap efforts (review) • Hope: Single-Photon Tools • Issues and concerns Bridging the Gap Absolute Radiometric Standards Sources Detectors Blackbody Trap: Radiometer T Electrical Substitution Temperature Radiance Radiant power Synchrotron e- Trap: B-field Semiconductor Radiant power (transfer standard) B-field, current, energy Radiance Radiometry Electrical Substitution Radiometry High-Accuracy Laser Cryogenic Optimized Radiometer Cryogenic (HACR) 1980s Radiometer (LOCR) 1990s From NIST Technical Note 1421, A. Parr Optical Power = Electrical Power Bridging the Gap Present Limits: • “World’s best” cryogenic radiometry is U = 0.01% • Primary standards (cryogenic radiometers) operate over limited range and relatively “high” powers • Typical operation is ~100 uW to ~1 mW • Dissemination to customers degrades due to transfer standard limits ~1% • Optical power traceability has the poorest uncertainty of major measurands • Difficult to link the lower range of optical powers to primary standards No formal connection between classical methods to measure optical power and new methods to measure single photons Bridging the Gap The gap 15 order-of-magnitude gap between cryogenic radiometry
    [Show full text]