DOCSLIB.ORG

Zostera Beds

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zostera Beds Background Document for Zostera beds, Seagrass beds Biodiversity Series 2009 OSPAR Convention Convention OSPAR The Convention for the Protection of the La Convention pour la protection du milieu Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic marin de l'Atlantique du Nord-Est, dite (the “OSPAR Convention”) was opened for Convention OSPAR, a été ouverte à la signature at the Ministerial Meeting of the signature à la réunion ministérielle des former Oslo and Paris Commissions in Paris anciennes Commissions d'Oslo et de Paris, on 22 September 1992. The Convention à Paris le 22 septembre 1992. La Convention entered into force on 25 March 1998. It has est entrée en vigueur le 25 mars 1998. been ratified by Belgium, Denmark, Finland, La Convention a été ratifiée par l'Allemagne, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, la Belgique, le Danemark, la Finlande, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, la France, l’Irlande, l’Islande, le Luxembourg, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom la Norvège, les Pays-Bas, le Portugal, and approved by the European Community le Royaume-Uni de Grande Bretagne and Spain. et d’Irlande du Nord, la Suède et la Suisse et approuvée par la Communauté européenne et l’Espagne. Acknowledgement This document has been prepared by Dr. Anita Tullrot, University of Gothenburg, on behalf of Sweden, as lead country for Zostera beds. Photo acknowledgement: Cover page: Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Ireland Contents Background document for Zostera beds, Seagrass beds .................................................................3 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................................3 Récapitulatif .......................................................................................................................................3 1. Background Information..........................................................................................................3 Nomination..............................................................................................................................3 Definition for habitat mapping.................................................................................................4 2. Original Evaluation against the Texel-Faial selection criteria .................................................4 OSPAR Regions and Dinter biogeographic zones where the habitat occurs ........................4 OSPAR Regions where the habitat is under threat and/or decline ........................................4 Original evaluation against the Texel-Faial criteria for which the habitat was included on the OSPAR List .................................................................................................................4 Relevant additional considerations.........................................................................................5 3. Current status of the habitat....................................................................................................6 Distribution in the OSPAR maritime area...............................................................................6 Extent of the habitats (current/trends/future prospects) .........................................................6 Condition (current/trends/future prospects)............................................................................7 Limitations in knowledge ........................................................................................................8 4. Evaluation of threats and impacts...........................................................................................8 5. Existing Management Measures.............................................................................................8 6. Conclusion on overall status ...................................................................................................9 7. What action should be taken at an OSPAR level? ...............................................................10 Action/measures that OSPAR could take, subject to OSPAR agreement ...........................10 Recommendation for further measures and activities:.........................................................11 Brief Summary of the proposed monitoring system .............................................................12 Annex 1: Overview of data and information provided by Contracting Parties ..............................13 Summaries of country-specific information provided.................................................................14 National overview of the distribution and extent of Zostera marina .....................................14 National information on the status and trends in condition of Zostera beds ........................15 National information on the existing management measures in OSPAR Contracting Party .....................................................................................................................................17 Annex 2: Description of the proposed monitoring and assessment strategy...............................19 Rationale for the proposed monitoring .................................................................................19 Use of existing monitoring programmes...............................................................................19 Synergies with monitoring of other species or habitats........................................................20 Proposed assessment criteria ..............................................................................................21 Techniques/approaches .......................................................................................................24 Baseline monitoring programme .....................................................................................24 Enhanced monitoring programme...................................................................................28 Timing and Frequency of monitoring....................................................................................30 Timing...................................................................................................................................30 Frequency.............................................................................................................................31 Data collection and reporting...........................................................................................31 Quality assurance............................................................................................................33 Annex 3: References............................................................................................................................34 2 OSPAR Commission 2009 Background document for Zostera beds, Seagrass beds Executive Summary This background document on Zostera beds has been developed by OSPAR following the inclusion of this habitat on the OSPAR List of threatened and/or declining species and habitats (OSPAR agreement 2008-6). The document provides a compilation of the reviews and assessments that have been prepared concerning this habitat since the agreement to include it in the OSPAR List in 2003. The original evaluation used to justify the inclusion of Zostera beds reefs in the OSPAR List is followed by an assessment of the most recent information on its status (distribution, extent, condition) and key threats prepared during 2008-2009. Chapter 7 provides recommendations for the actions and measures that could be taken to improve the conservation status of the habitat. In agreeing to the publication of this document, Contracting Parties have indicated the need to further review these proposals. Publication of this background document does not, therefore, imply any formal endorsement of these proposals by the OSPAR Commission. On the basis of the further review of these proposals, OSPAR will continue its work to ensure the protection of Zostera beds, where necessary in cooperation with other competent organisations. This background document may be updated to reflect further developments or further information on the status of the habitat which becomes available. Récapitulatif Le présent document de fond sur les herbiers de Zostera a été élaboré par OSPAR à la suite de l’inclusion de cet habitat dans la liste OSPAR des espèces et habitats menacés et/ou en déclin (Accord OSPAR 2008- 6). Ce document comporte une compilation des revues et des évaluations concernant cet habitat qui ont été préparées depuis qu’il a été convenu de l’inclure dans la Liste OSPAR en 2003. L’évaluation d’origine permettant de justifier l’inclusion des herbiers de Zostera dans la Liste OSPAR est suivie d’une évaluation des informations les plus récentes sur son statut (distribution, étendue et condition) et des menaces clés, préparée en 2008-2009. Le chapitre 7 fournit des propositions d’actions et de mesures qui pourraient être prises afin d’améliorer l’état de conservation de l’habitat. En se mettant d’accord sur la publication de ce document, les Parties contractantes ont indiqué la nécessité de réviser de nouveau ces propositions. La publication de ce document ne signifie pas, par conséquent que la Commission OSPAR entérine ces propositions de manière formelle. A partir de la nouvelle révision de ces propositions, OSPAR poursuivra ses travaux afin de s’assurer de la protection des herbiers de Zostera le cas échéant avec la coopération d’autres organisations compétentes. Ce document de fond pourra être actualisé
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jef Last's Zuiderzee: the Price of Progress
    rI ! BASIL D. KINGSTONE, UNNERSITY OF WINDSOR I I Jef Last's Zuiderzee: The Price of Progress Jef Last was born in the Hague in 1898, the son of a of 1916 which finally leads the government to close off ship's captain. He attended Leiden University and the Zuiderzee, thr.ough the long hard struggle to connect studied Chinese, but while there he joined the socialist Wieringen to Holland, the closure of the Wieringermeer party, and his father promptly cut off his allowance. As and the creation of the Northwest Polder in 1930, and a result he took a variety of jobs during the 1920s, and the completion of the Afsluitdijk in 1932, to an undated in his choices we can see his future interests. His (and presumably imaginary) record-breaking storm and solidarity with the workers no doubt led him to protest flood which the great dyke successfully withstands. We at conditions in a textile mill where he worked, because see the lives, through this long period, of many people, there was a strike and he was fired. He was also a sailor but principally of the two fishermen Toen and Auke; in the merchant marine, and in later years he worked for Toen's sister Sistke and her second husband Wibren the seamen's union called the International Transport Sibesma, a Friesian peasant; his sister Boukje, and Federation. Once in New York he was a travelling another in-law, the engineer Brolsma, who is in charge salesman for a photographic portrait studio called of the dyke-building.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Methods for Restoration of Eelgrass (Zostera Marina L.) in a Cold Temperate Region
    Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 479 (2016) 76–88 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jembe Assessing methods for restoration of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in a cold temperate region Louise Eriander a,⁎, Eduardo Infantes b, Malin Olofsson a, Jeanine L. Olsen c,Per-OlavMoksnesa a Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden b Department of Marine Sciences, Kristineberg Marine Biological Laboratory, University of Gothenburg, S-45178 Fiskebäckskil, Sweden c Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Postbus 11103, 9700 CC Groningen, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: More than 50% of eelgrass habitats have disappeared from the Swedish NW coast in the last 30 years. Restoration Received 7 July 2015 is being proposed to assist recovery but little is known regarding methods suitable under Scandinavian condi- Received in revised form 12 February 2016 tions; e.g. short growing seasons and scouring by ice. In the present study we evaluated different restoration Accepted 11 March 2016 methods using shoots and seeds in a Swedish fjord and assessed if eelgrass could be successfully transplanted Available online xxxx between sites with different depth and exposure. The study demonstrates that both shoot- and seed methods can be successfully used to restore eelgrass at this latitude. Survival and growth of unanchored single shoots, Keywords: – N Eelgrass transplanted without sediment in shallow habitats (1.0 1.5 m) was very high ( 500% increase in shoot density Restoration after 14 months). This restoration method showed 2–3.5 times higher growth rate and was 2–2.5 times faster High latitude compared with shoots anchored in the sediment and shoots transplanted in sediment cores, respectively, and Method assessment is recommended for shallow habitats in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Zostera Japonica and Zostera Marina) in Padilla Bay, Washington Annie Walser Western Washington University
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2014 A study of pore-water sulfide nda eelgrass (Zostera japonica and Zostera marina) in Padilla Bay, Washington Annie Walser Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Walser, Annie, "A study of pore-water sulfide nda eelgrass (Zostera japonica and Zostera marina) in Padilla Bay, Washington" (2014). WWU Graduate School Collection. 350. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/350 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A STUDY OF PORE-WATER SULFIDE AND EELGRASS (ZOSTERA JAPONICA AND ZOSTERA MARINA) IN PADILLA BAY, WASHINGTON By Annie Walser Accepted in Partial Completion Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Kathleen Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE Chair, Dr. David Shull Dr. Sylvia Yang Dr. John Rybczyk MASTER’S THESIS In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non-exclusive royalty-free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Creatures of Mystery: Global Research on Syngnathidae Fishes
    Creatures of Mystery: Global Research on Syngnathidae Fishes Meeting Schedule for SyngBio 2021 (Time Zone: UTC+8, Beijing, China) (Continually updating) We are delighted to have you join us for the SyngBio2021 meeting! We believe we have a dynamic and broad program, with contributed work from at least 15 countries and 5 continents, and fantastic invited speakers! 1 / 7 17 May, Monday Time and Duration Agenda Location 09:00am- Ramada Hotel Meeting on-site Registration 17 May 12:00am (Guangzhou) Morning 03:00pm- Ramada Hotel Meeting on-site Registration 06:00pm (Guangzhou) 18 May, Tuesday Opening Ceremony - In-person & Online Online Zoom ID: to be updated Moderator: Qiang Lin Time and Duration Agenda Person Qiang Lin, Chairman 09:00am- Announcing the beginning of ceremony of the Conference 09:10am (China) Director of the South 09:10am- China Sea Institute Welcome and Announcement 09:20am of Oceanology (China) 09:20am- Amanda C.J. Vincent To be updated 09:50am (Canada) 18 May 09:50am- Morning Photos & Coffee break 10:20am 10:20am- Plenary speech: Global Syngnathiformes Genome Project Qiang Lin 10:30am (GSGP) (China) 10:30am- Camilla Whittington Plenary speech: To be updated 11:00am (USA) 11:00am- Josefin Stiller Plenary speech: To be updated 11:30am (Denmark) 11:30am- Development of seahorse brood pouch in the aspect of Mari Kawaguchi 12:00am neofunctionalization of the genes (Japan) 2 / 7 Session (Syngnathid Conservation) - In-person & Online Online Zoom ID: to be updated Suggested Moderator: Louw Claassens & Xiong Zhang Time and Duration
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Shanny Lipophrys Pholis (Blenniidae) in Germany
    Bulletin of Fish Biology Volume 19 30.04.2021 111-116 First record of shanny Lipophrys pholis (Blenniidae) in Germany Erstnachweis des Schans Lipophrys pholis (Blenniidae) für Deutschland Heiko Brunken & René Sonntag Hochschule Bremen, Fakultät 5 Natur und Technik, Neustadtswall 30, D-28199 Bremen, Germany, [email protected], [email protected] Summary: In 2016 and 2017, adult and juvenile specimens of Lipophrys pholis (family Blenniidae) were re- corded in rocky tidepools of Helgoland as a fi rst record for Germany. The species, which is more common in south-western areas of the North Sea, shows tendencies to spread into the German Bight, which can be interpreted as an indication of a climate-induced range expansion. Key words: Lipophrys pholis, fi rst record, Helgoland (Germany) Zusammenfassung: Im Felswatt von Helgoland wurden in den Jahren 2016 und 2017 adulte und juvenile Exemplare des Schans (Schleimlerche) Lipophrys pholis (Familie Blenniidae) als Erstnachweis für Deutschland in steinigen Gezeitentümpeln nachgewiesen. Die eher in südwestlichen Bereichen der Nordsee verbreitete Art zeigt Ausbreitungstendenzen in die Deutsche Bucht, was als Hinweis auf eine klimabedingte Arealer- weiterung gedeutet werden kann. Schlüsselwörter: Lipophrys pholis, Erstnachweis , Helgoland (Germany) 1. Introduction Baltic Sea”, but without further details. In the “Red List of Cyclostomes and Marine Fishes of The shanny Lipophrys pholis is the most common the German Wadden Sea and North Sea Area” of the two blenny species (Bleniidae) found L. pholis is only listed as “non-endangered stray in the North Sea and is considered reason- visitor” (FRICKE et al. 1995). In the current “Red ably common there, mostly in British coastal List and Check List of Established Fishes and waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Production from the Mixed Mating System of Chesapeake Bay (USA) Eelgrass (Zostera Marina; Zosteraceae)
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by College of William & Mary: W&M Publish W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles 2-2004 Seed production from the mixed mating system of Chesapeake Bay (USA) eelgrass (Zostera marina; Zosteraceae) JM Rhode Virginia Institute of Marine Science JE Duffy Virginia Institute of Marine Science Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Rhode, JM and Duffy, JE, "Seed production from the mixed mating system of Chesapeake Bay (USA) eelgrass (Zostera marina; Zosteraceae)" (2004). VIMS Articles. 1643. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/1643 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. American Journal of Botany 91(2): 192±197. 2004. SEED PRODUCTION FROM THE MIXED MATING SYSTEM OF CHESAPEAKE BAY (USA) EELGRASS (ZOSTERA MARINA;ZOSTERACEAE)1 JENNIFER M. RHODE2 AND J. EMMETT DUFFY College of William and Mary, School of Marine Science, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 USA In monoecious plants, gametes can be exchanged in three ways: among unrelated genets (outbreeding), with close relatives (in- breeding), or within individuals (geitonogamous sel®ng). These different mating systems may have consequences for population demography and ®tness. The experiment presented herein used arti®cial crosses to examine the mating system of Chesapeake Bay, Virginia, USA eelgrass (Zostera marina L; Zosteraceae), a bisexual submerged aquatic plant that can outbreed, inbreed, and self.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Conservation of Eelgrass (Zostera Marina) in Eastern Canada
    Status and Conservation of Eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Eastern Canada Alan R. Hanson Atlantic Region 2004 Canadian Wildlife Service Environmental Conservation Branch Technical Report Series Number 412 TECHNICAL REPORT SERIES CANADIAN WILDLIFE SERVICE This series of reports, established in 1986, contains technical and scientific information from projects of the Canadian Wildlife Service. The reports are intended to make available material that either is of interest to a limited audience or is too extensive to be accommodated in scientific journals or in existing CWS series. Demand for these Technical Reports is usually confined to specialists in the fields concerned. Consequently, they are produced regionally and in small quantities; they can be obtained only from the address given on the title page. However, they are numbered nationally. The recommended citation appears on the title page. Technical Reports are available in CWS libraries and are listed in the catalogue of the National Library of Canada in scientific libraries across Canada. They are printed in the official language chosen by the author to meet the language preference of the likely audience, with a résumé in the second official language. To determine whether there is significant demand for making the reports available in the second official language, CWS invites users to specify their official language preference. Requests for Technical Reports in the second official language should be sent to the address on the title page. SÉRIE DE RAPPORTS TECHNIQUES DU SERVICE CANADIEN DE LA FAUNE Cette série de rapports donnant des informations scientifiques et techniques sur les projets du Service canadien de la faune (SCF) a démarré en 1986.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Assessment of Critical Anthropogenic Sediment Burial in Eelgrass Zostera Marina
    Experimental assessment of critical anthropogenic sediment burial in eelgrass Zostera marina Britta Munkes1a & Philipp R Schubert1a*, Rolf Karez2, and Thorsten BH Reusch1 1 GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel, Evolutionary Ecology of Marine Fishes, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany 2 State Agency for Agriculture, Environment, and Rural Areas Schleswig-Holstein (LLUR), Hamburger Chaussee 25, D-24220 Flintbek, Germany a B. Munkes and P.R. Schubert each contributed equally to the manuscript (shared first authorship) * Corresponding author: Philipp R Schubert, [email protected], Düsternbrooker Weg 20, D-24105 Kiel, Germany, Tel.:+49-(0)431-600-4538 1 Abstract Seagrass meadows, one of the world’s most important and productive coastal habitats, are threatened by a range of anthropogenic actions. Burial of seagrass plants due to coastal activities is one important anthropogenic pressure leading to decline of local populations. In our study, we assessed the response of eelgrass Zostera marina to sediment burial from physiological, morphological, and population parameters. In a full factorial field experiment, burial level (5-20 cm) and burial duration (4-16 weeks) were manipulated. Negative effects were visible even at the lowest burial level (5 cm) and shortest duration (4 weeks), with increasing effects over time and burial level. Buried seagrasses showed higher shoot mortality, delayed growth and flowering and lower carbohydrate storage. The observed effects will likely have an impact on next year’s survival of buried plants. Our results have implications for the management of this important coastal plant. Keywords mortality; seagrass; sedimentation; carbohydrates; Baltic Sea Introduction Seagrass meadows are one of the world’s most important and productive coastal habitats (Costanza et al., 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Estuarine Mudcrab (Rhithropanopeus Harrisii) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Estuarine Mudcrab (Rhithropanopeus harrisii) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, May 2018 Web Version, 6/13/2018 Photo: C. Seltzer. Licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0. Available: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/4047991. (May 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Perry (2018): “Original range presumed to be in fresh to estuarine waters from the southwestern Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, through the Gulf of Mexico to Vera Cruz, Mexico (Williams 1984).” 1 Status in the United States From Perry (2018): “The Harris mud crab was introduced to California in 1937 and is now abundant in the brackish waters of San Francisco Bay and freshwaters of the Central Valley (Aquatic Invaders, Elkhorn Slough Foundation). Ricketts and Calvin (1952) noted its occurrence in Coos Bay, Oregon in 1950. Rhithropanopeus harrisii, a common resident of Texas estuaries, has recently expanded its range to freshwater reservoirs in that state (Howells 2001; […]). They have been found in the E.V. Spence, Colorado City, Tradinghouse Creek, Possum Kingdom, and Lake Balmorhea reservoirs. These occurrences are the first records of this species in freshwater inland lakes.” From Fofonoff et al. (2018): “[…] R. harrisii has invaded many estuaries in different parts of the world, and has even colonized some freshwater reservoirs in Texas and Oklahoma, where high mineral content of the water may promote survival and permit reproduction (Keith 2006; Boyle 2010).” This species is in trade in the United States. From eBay (2018): “3 Freshwater Dwarf Mud Crabs Free Shipping!!” “Price: US $26.00” “You are bidding on 3 unsexed Freshwater Dwarf Mud Crabs (Rhithropanopeus harrisii).” Means of Introductions in the United States From Fofonoff et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Centenary of the Zuiderzee Act: a Masterpiece of Engineering
    NEWS Centenary of the Zuiderzee Act: a Masterpiece of Engineering The Dutch Zuiderzee Act came into force exactly 100 years ago today, on 14 June 1918. The Zuiderzee Act signalled the beginning of the works that continue to protect the heart of The Netherlands from the dangers and vagaries of the Zuiderzee, an inlet of the North Sea, to this day. This amazing feat of engineering and spatial planning was a key milestone in The Netherlands’ world-leading reputation for reclaiming land from the sea. Wim van Wegen, content manager at ‘GIM International’, was born, raised and still lives in the Noordoostpolder, one of the various polders that were constructed. He has written an article about the uniqueness of this area of reclaimed land. I was born at the bottom of the sea. Want to fact-check this? Just compare a pre-1940s map of the Netherlands to a more contemporary one. The old map shows an inlet of the North Sea, the Zuiderzee. The new one reveals large parts of the Zuiderzee having been turned into land, actually no longer part of the North Sea. In 1932, a 32km-long dam (the Afsluitdijk) was completed, separating the former Zuiderzee and the North Sea. This part of the sea was turned into a lake, the IJsselmeer (also known as Lake IJssel or Lake Yssel in English). Why 'polder' is a Dutch word The idea behind the construction of the Afsluitdijk was to defend areas against flooding, caused by the force of the open sea. The dam is part of the Zuiderzee Works, a man-made system of dams and dikes, land reclamation and water drainage works.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Zostera Species in Japan. I Zostera Marina L. (Zosteraceae)
    Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. B, 35(1), pp. 23–40, March 22, 2009 Distribution of Zostera species in Japan. I Zostera marina L. (Zosteraceae) Norio Tanaka1,*, Satoshi Aida2, Shoichi Akaike3, Hiroshi Aramaki4, Takashi Chiyokubo5, Seinen Chow6, Akihiko Fujii7, Munehiro Fujiwara8, Hitoshi Ikeuchi9, Mitsuhiro Ishii10, Ryoko Ishikawa11, Hiroshi Ito12, Takahiro Kudo13, Daisuke Muraoka14, Tatsuaki Nagahama15, Tomohide Nambu16, Hiroyuki Okumura17, Akio Oshino18, Miho Saigusa19, Yasuko Shimizu20, Tsuyoshi Suwa21, Kengo Suzuki22, Kazuya Takeda23, Norio Tanada24, Tsuyoshi Tanimoto25, Fujinori Tsuda26, Seiji Urabe27, Kousuke Yatsuya28, Goro Yoshida29, Takashi Yoshimatsu30, Satoshi Yoshimitsu31, Keizo Yoshimura32, Kenji Morita33 and Kenji Saitoh34 1 Department of Botany, National Museum of Nature and Science, Amakubo 4–1–1, Tsukuba, 305–0005 Japan 2 Hiroshima Prefectural Technology Research Institute, Fisheries & Ocean Technology Center, Hatami 6–21–1, Ondo-cho, Kure, 737–1207 Japan 3 Hokkaido Hakodate Experiment Station, Yunokawa 1–2–66, Hakodate, 042–0932 Japan 4 Saga Prefectural Government, Jonai 1–1–59, Saga, 840–8570 Japan 5 Fukushima Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station, Matsushita Shimokajiro 13–2, Onahama, Iwaki, 970–0316 Japan 6 National Research Institute of Fisheries Science, Coastal Fisheries and Aquaculture Division, Fisheries Research Agency, Nagai 6–31–1, Yokosuka, 238–0316 Japan 7 Nagasaki Prefectural Institute of Fisheries, Taira, Nagasaki, 851–2213 Japan 8 Kagawa Prefectural Fisheries Experimental Station, Farming and Cultivation
    [Show full text]
  • DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
    EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor.
    [Show full text]