Ronal Reagan Called Her His Favorite Economist, and Wendy Lee Gramm Seemed to Deserve the Praise

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ronal Reagan Called Her His Favorite Economist, and Wendy Lee Gramm Seemed to Deserve the Praise Ronal Reagan called her his favorite economist, and Wendy Lee Gramm seemed to deserve the praise. Both while she was an academic economist and after reagan appointed her to various regulatory positions in his administration , she excelled in articulating antiregulatory rhetoric that marked hyer as a true believer in what would later be labeled the "Reagan Revolution". Reagan himself had risen in politics after eight years of tutelage as a spokesman for the General Electric Company, from 1954 to 1962. It was a time of conversion, as he described it, from being a "hemophiliac liberal" Hollywood actor to a cold-blooded Big Business conservative. Carryng the company´s banner, Reagan came to absorb the message that goverment regulation developed during the New Deal had become a chokehold on economic growth. Although as governor of California and laterin the white House Reagan would preside over massive goverment budgets and even expand them, he found in gramm an ideological "small goverment" soul mate. The Mercatus Center, an antiregulation think tank based at George Mason University from which Gramm has proselytized mightily, proudly boasts in her website biografy that the wall Street Journal "Called her "The Margaret Tatcher of financial Regulation" However, unlike the former British prime minister, neither Gramm nor President Reagan was able to bring about much change in the balance between goverment and the private sector. While his administration did funnel hundreds of billions of dollars in new Cold War military spending to corporate contractors- hugely expanding the national debt in the process- Reagan was no able to deliver to Wall Street a parallel windfall. For Wall street, the holy grail was not cash handouts but a deconstruction of the complex public-private partnership ushered in by Frankling Roosevelt's New Deal to restrain capitalism's most self-destructive patterns.For these so- called FIRE firms-Finance, Insurance, and Real State-this half-century-old regulatory system, modest as it was, was an iritant that limited their ability to gamble and leverage their dominant positions. While the companies just wanted to be free of restraint to profit at will, reagan and Gramm werw true believers, arguing thaht the regulatory status quo was outmoded and onerous-even socialist-hobbling business growth. The top target in their sigths was the New Deal-enacted Glass Steagall Act of 1933, signed into law by "President Roosevelt", which regulayted the financial services industry. Key to its efectiveness was the seemingly simple wall it erected between the commercial banks entrusted with depositor's funds-and insured by the goverment's Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the agency unregulated Wall Street investment banks like Goldman Sachs. In 1982, Reagan signed the Garn- St. Germain Depository Instituions Act. easing rergulation of savings and loans and in the eyes of criticis such as Paul Krugman, paving the way for the S&L collapse in the 1980s as well as the subprime housing crisis decades later.Nevertheless, Reagan made clear even then that this was not the biggest target on his list: Unfortunately, this legislation does not deal with the important question of delivery of the other services, including securities activities by banks and other depository institutions. But I'm advised that many in the Congress want to put this question at the top of the banking deregulatory agendes next year, and I would strongly endorse such an initiative and hopethat at the same time, the Congress will consider other proposals for more comprehenssive deregulation which the administration advanced during the 97th Congress. Reagan's timeline, however, was overly optimistic; economic problems, particulary the savings and loan meltdown and the spiraling national debt, made politicians of both parties cautions. Yet, in one of the grand twists of American politics, the proposals he sought wouls eventually be signed into law more than a decade later by a Democratic president with a reputation of being a liberal child of the 1960's. In fact, at the end of Reagan's presidency, Congress passed legislation that toughened rather than weakened financial industry rgulation. As time magazine reported on August 17, 1987: Ronald Reagan's dream of carrying out a sweeping deregulationof the US economy has stirred a powerful backlash on Capitol Hill. Never has that been more apparent than last week, when COngress passed its first comprehensive piece of banking legislation since 1982. The White House had hoped the bill would remove many of the govermental shackles that inhibit competition between banks, securities firms and other institutions in the burgeoning field of financial services. In fact, it does just the opposite. Reagan signed the bill, the Competitive Equiality Bancking Act of 1987, only after criticizing it for not only failing to tear down the Glass-Steagall walls but, worse, temporarily extending "the 1933 Glass-Steagall Act restrictions on securities activities to state-chartered, non-member banks for the first time". He made it clear he was signing the bill despite his quite vociferous objections because it contained provisions for funding for local banks in trouble. It was at once a statement of the enormous importance he attached to decimating Glass-Steagall and an admissionn that he would come to the end of his last term without a accomplishing that goal. So legislatively his adminsitration was a bust when is came to reversing the New Deal. Yet rhetorically it was an enormous success in propagandizing a view that so-called big goverment was the cause of America's late-twentieth- century crisis of economic confidence. He managed to popularize and make palatable the heretofore fringe belief that goverment regulation of the financial sector, rather than saving capitalism from itself, was an irrational hindrance to individual profit and even a threat to our national power. Speaking at the signing of the 1987 bill, Reagan noted, "These new anti- consumer and anti-cpmpetitive provisions couls hold back a vital service industry at a time when competition in the international capital markets increasingly challenges United States financial isntitutions, and they should be repealed". Whit great political irony, this speech would be repeated almost word for word a dozen years later, when Democrat Bill Clinton reversed a half century of his party's core economic principles to argue for the repeal of Glass- Steagall. Clinton's public rationale for this watershed shift was that if regulation of WallStreet were not "modernized"-political code for weakened or eliminated-the United States would lose out to foreign competition in capital makets. Much of the groundwork for Clinton's break was laid by the diligent Republican Wendy Lee Gramm and her husband, Senator Phil Gramm, also a Texas Republican. The high priestess and priest of financial deregulation met at a conference in New York where Wendy Lee, a PhD student in economics, was interviewing with Phil Gramm for a position at Texas A&M University, where he was a senior professor. Wendy Gramm would later tell interviewers that as Professor Gramm was helping her on with her coat at the intervie's conclusion, he expressed interest in dating her if she came to Texas. She later told the New York Times her action to him was "Oh, yuck", but Gramm persisted, and six weeks after she arrived on campues, they wed. His bold self-confidence might have helped carry the duo as apostles of an unabashedly Big Business creed then increasingly gaining currency in academic economic circles and within both political parties. Back in 1976, in fact, Jimmy Carter, now know mostly for his post presidency activism on behalf of Thirs World democracy, Middle East peace, and ending poverty in America, was a strong advocate of business deregulation. As Georgia's governor, Carter had been a fiscal conservative who, in the tradition of conserative Southern Democrats, shunned Northern liberalism. Phil Gramm .
Recommended publications
  • Miss Enron and Senator Shylock: the Corrupt Saga of Wendy and Phil Gramm
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 29, Number 20, May 24, 2002 Miss Enron and Senator Shylock: The Corrupt Saga of Wendy and Phil Gramm by John Hoefle If the ability to learn from one’s mistakes is the test of wisdom, targetted Federal spending on infrastructure and social pro- then few couples fail the test more resoundingly than those grams vital to the welfare of the population and physical econ- “demons of deregulation,” Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Tex.) and his omy. It also, not coincidentally, curtailed spending on Presi- wife, Dr. Wendy Lee Gramm. The Gramms have devoted dent Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative, the brainchild of their careers to overthrowing the General Welfare provisions Lyndon LaRouche. of the American System and subjecting the U.S. population At the time, LaRouche warned that the Gramm-Rudman to the imperial looting this nation was founded to stop. Theirs approach was incompetent as a deficit-reduction act, as it is a remarkable record of self-serving activity, conflicts of would erode the tax revenue base and actually lead to greater interest, failed policies, greed, and incompetence; everything deficits. LaRouche was right. According to the U.S. Treasury, they have touched has been a disaster, of which the collapse the Federal deficit for fiscal 1985 was $212 billion, a figure of Enron is but the tip of the iceberg. which jumped to $221 billion in fiscal 1986. The deficit shrank While Senator Gramm is the more prominent of the pair, to just over $150 billion for fiscal years 1987, 1988, and 1989, Wendy Gramm has also played an important role in the cre- then took off again, jumping to $221 billion in fiscal 1990, ation of the biggest financial bubble in history.
    [Show full text]
  • SEIU Blitzes Houston Air Force "Pajama Police" Defeated Plus: Ivins on Freedom & Volleyball Eighner on Godly Republicans Tyer on Sex Pistols in Houston
    THE TEXAS A JOURNAL OF FREE VOICES Reports from Sierra Blanca Labor's Day: SEIU Blitzes Houston Air Force "Pajama Police" Defeated Plus: Ivins on Freedom & Volleyball Eighner on Godly Republicans Tyer on Sex Pistols in Houston Wst:tz -A0:4S THIS ISSUE FEATURES Dole Takes Control by Louis Dubose Cheerleaders, Christians, and CEOs Aplenty in San Diego. Guess Who's Throwing the Party? We All Live in Sierra Blanca by Karen Olsson and Carrie Evans 10 Sierra Blancans and supporters from across the state and across the border bear witness against the nuclear dump. Is anybody listening? Blitzing Houston with the SEIU by Ann Walton Sieber 14 This Labor Day, there's a new wind blowing across the South, VOLUME 88, NO. 17 and these union blitzers brought it to Texas. A JOURNAL OF FREE VOICES We will serve no group or party but will hew hard to the Air Force Major Defeats "the Pajama Police" by Robert Bryce 17 truth as we find it and the right as we see it. We are ded- icated to the whole truth, to human values above all in- The Air Force asked Major Debra Meeks to abandon her career and disappear. terests, to the rights of human-kind as the foundation of democracy: we will take orders from none but our own Instead, she beat them in their own court. conscience, and never will we overlook or misrepresent the truth to serve the interests of the powerful or cater to the ignoble in the human spirit. DEPARTMENTS BOOKS AND THE CULTURE Writers are responsible for their own work, but not Texas Summer & Sunflowers 23 for anything they have not themselves written, and in Dialogue 2 publishing them we do not necessarily imply that we Poetry by Robert Trammell agree with them, because this is a journal of free voices.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 9:30 A.M., and Was Senators Carrying Our Nation’S Burdens Mr
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 No. 134 Senate The Senate met at 9:30 a.m., and was Senators carrying our Nation’s burdens Mr. LOTT. Mr. President, I yield to called to order by the President pro and responsibilities lose Your voice the Senator from North Dakota. The tempore [Mr. THURMOND]. amid all the voices that plead for their guest Chaplain this morning is from The PRESIDENT pro tempore. We attention. If Your voice is still and his church. have a guest Chaplain this morning, small, give them quiet hearts, peace- the Reverend George W. Evans, Jr., of filled minds, and receptive souls so f the Redeemer Lutheran Church in they may discern Your presence and be McLean, VA. drawn to Your ways. Never are they THE GUEST CHAPLAIN We are pleased to have you with us. apart from You. It is urgent that they have the strength of this knowledge. Mr. DORGAN. Mr. President, I appre- PRAYER Likewise, protect their homes and ciate the courtesy of the Senator from The guest Chaplain, the Reverend Dr. loved ones with the security of Your Mississippi. The prayer this morning George W. Evans, Jr., the Redeemer presence. Let no press of events, no cal- was offered by the Reverend George Lutheran Church, McLean, VA, offered endar, no clamor for attention, no tu- Evans, who is pastor at Redeemer Lu- the following prayer: mult of the day detract from the plain theran Church in McLean, VA.
    [Show full text]
  • Koch Foundation and Other Opponents of Regulation Dominate Known Donors to the Rsc
    Acknowledgments This report was written by Taylor Lincoln, Research Director for the Congress Watch division of Public Citizen, and edited by Susan Harley, Deputy Director of Congress Watch. Public Citizen Regulatory Policy Analyst Amit Narang, Vice President of Legislative Affairs Lisa Gilbert and President Robert Weissman provided expert insights. UnKoch My Campus provided valuable data and insights. Cover art by Bret Thompson. About Public Citizen Public Citizen is a national non-profit organization with more than 500,000 members and supporters. We represent consumer interests through lobbying, litigation, administrative advocacy, research, and public education on a broad range of issues including consumer rights in the marketplace, product safety, financial regulation, worker safety, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform and government ethics, fair trade, climate change, and corporate and government accountability. A KEY COG IN CHARLES KOCH’S MASTER PLAN: THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY REGULATORY STUDIES CENTER CONTENTS CONTENTS KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 7 I. BIAS: THE REGULATORY STUDIES CENTER’S PUBLIC COMMENTS AND OTHER WRITINGS OVERWHELMINGLY OPPOSE REGULATION ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Susan Dudley Threatens Public Protections
    THE COST IS TOO HIGH How Susan Dudley Threatens Public Protections A Report by Public Citizen and OMB Watch September 2006 Acknowledgments The principal authors of The Cost Is Too High: How Susan Dudley Threatens Public Protections are Public Citizen policy analysts Gwynneth Anderson and Matt Pelkey and OMB Watch policy analyst Genevieve Smith, with additional contributions and editorial supervision from Robert Shull, who began the project as Director of Regulatory Policy for OMB Watch and concluded it as Deputy Director for Auto Safety and Regulatory Policy for Public Citizen. The authors gratefully acknowledge Gary Bass, Angela Bradbery, Joan Claybrook, Barbara Holzer, Laura MacCleery, Chris Murray, Rachel Pleatman, Lena Pons, Brian Wolfman, and Robert Yule for their insightful questions, attentive readings, and astute comments. The section “Where Does She Get These Radical Ideas?” was originally the product of a 2003 investigation conducted by Public Citizen’s Congress Watch, with contributions from Neal Pattison, Andrew Benore, Wendy Keegan, John Kruger, Alex Knott, April Greener, Tyson Slocum, and Frank Clemente. It was updated and significantly revised by Anderson, Pelkey, and Shull. Public Citizen is a 150,000-member nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C. protecting health, safety, and democracy through lobbying, litigation, research, and public education. Since its founding by Ralph Nader in 1971, Public Citizen has fought for consumer rights in the marketplace, safe and affordable health care, campaign finance reform, fair trade, clean and safe energy sources, and corporate and government accountability. Public Citizen has five divisions and is active in every public forum: Congress, the courts, governmental agencies, and the media.
    [Show full text]
  • A Republic Not Worth Keeping: How Bonds Between Private Finance and Public Service Subvert the General Welfare
    A REPUBLIC NOT WORTH KEEPING: HOW BONDS BETWEEN PRIVATE FINANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE SUBVERT THE GENERAL WELFARE A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of The School of Continuing Studies and of The Graduate School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Studies By Charles McCarthy, B.A. Georgetown University Washington, D.C. October 31, 2012 A REPUBLIC NOT WORTH KEEPING: HOW BONDS BETWEEN PRIVATE FINANCE AND PUBLIC SERVICE SUBVERT THE GENERAL WELFARE Charles McCarthy, B.A. Thomas Kerch, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This paper draws upon the chronology of the nation’s most recent financial crisis, the Great Recession, to expose America’s undemocratic governing reality and postulate that its existence rests upon the preferential bonds forged between private money and public service. Over many years, these connections have assumed a dominant role in the body politic, such that they have superceded the Constitution and subverted the collective will of the American people. This usurpation in authority will become apparent through examinations of modern campaign finance, financial regulatory law and its administration, and the operations of the nation’s central bank, the Federal Reserve. As such major reforms are needed to these institutions, alongside a broader effort to educate the U.S. citizenry about its money supply and how it influences the national economy. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis is dedicated to my family and friends. To my wife, Liz, who exhibited unwavering love, encouragement, resolve, and breadwinning skills. To my mother and father, Adel and Charlie, who provided me with seemingly infinite resources, foremost among them a formidable work ethic, an ethical foundation from which to stand against injustice, and the will to persevere, without which I would not have been able to find myself in pursuit of a graduate-level degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Pipe Dreams Robert Bryce
    Praise for Pipe Dreams "A biting, incisive look at corporate excesses... funny, opinion- ated and not shy in offering harsh moral judgement." The Dallas Morning News "[A ]delicious disembowling of the company.... Bryce has a rare ability to explain complex financial concepts clearly, combined with a breezy, colloquial style that makes his story a page turner." Salon.com "While most [missteps] have been reported in some fashion in the buckets of ink spilled on the story, Bryce still packs a punch by gathering all the damning details in one place ... Bryce is most compelling when he sketches the corrupt cast of charac- ters." BusinessWeek "There's nothing familiar about what Robert Bryce has accom- plished in this superb book ... Meticulously researched ... Bryce presents [financial] stuff with such admirable clarity that even the most numerically illiterate English major can grasp its gist." Austin Chronicle "It's a Barbarians at the Gate-type read." Cindy Adams, New York Post "Robert Bryce has done a brilliant job of explaining what Enron was all about and what made it fall apart. Better still, he pro- vides fascinating insights into the lives of the firm's executives who were calling the shots...a mesmerizing read." Tulsa World "Humorous ... entertaining and easy-to-follow.... Bryce's account sets the bar high for other Enron books to come." San-Jose Mercury News "No one succeeds in telling the story like Texas journalist Robert Bryce. His straightforward book ... is a must-read for the busi- ness set, and an enjoyable read for the rest of us." National Post (Canada) "Bryce, who understands the flamboyance built into Texas busi- ness culture, clarifies Enron's muddled and deceptive accounting practices, deconstructs the bone-headed and perpetually hyped ventures ..
    [Show full text]