Media Ethics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Media Ethics Media Ethics Media Ethics: Key Principles for Responsible Practice equips students with the knowledge and critical skill sets they need to develop a solid foundation in ethical Key Principles for Responsible Practice thinking and responsible media behavior. The text balances ethics theory with case studies to explain key ethical principles and their application in real-world THIRD EDITION media practice. The book introduces classical and contemporary ethics theory and helps students develop a greater understanding of and appreciation for the deliberative process required for responsible media practice. Dedicated chapters address key ethical principles including transparency, justice, harm, autonomy, privacy, and community. Case studies throughout the book provide examples of media behaviors that have posed real-life dilemmas. These contemporary examples underscore the need for ethical media practice and also set the stage for lively debate and reflection. The third edition includes up-to-date case studies, media research, and ethics theory applications to media technologies. Three new chapters address moral decision-making in everyday life, the key factors involved in being a responsible media consumer, and ethical and policy questions surrounding Big Data and our data-driven media system. Developed to foster ethical thought and decision-making, Media Ethics is the ideal textbook for courses dealing with ethics in journalism, public relations, advertising, strategic communication, and media marketing. Patrick Lee Plaisance is the Don W. Davis Professor in Ethics at the Bellisario College of Communications at Pennsylvania State University. He is the editor of the Journal of Media Ethics and an affiliate faculty member of the Rock Ethics Institute. He is the author of Virtue in the Media: The Moral Psychology of Excellence in News & Public Relations and editor of Handbook of Communication & Media Ethics. His research focuses on media ethics theory, moral psychology theory and methods, and the philosophy of technologywww.cognella.com as applied to media systems and practices. FOR Patrick Lee Plaisance PLACEMENT ONLY SKU 82974-1A Media Ethics Key Principles for Responsible Practice THIRD EDITION Patrick Lee Plaisance Pennsylvania State University SAN DIEGO To Atisaya, as always. Bassim Hamadeh, CEO and Publisher Todd R. Armstrong, Publisher Tony Paese, Project Editor Abbey Hastings, Production Editor Abbie Goveia, Graphic Design Assistant Stephanie Kohl, Licensing Coordinator Ursina Kilburn, Interior Designer Natalie Piccotti, Director of Marketing Kassie Graves, Vice President of Editorial Jamie Giganti, Director of Academic Publishing Copyright © 2021 by Cognella, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information retrieval system without the written permission of Cognella, Inc. For inquiries regarding permissions, translations, foreign rights, audio rights, and any other forms of reproduction, please contact the Cognella Licensing Department at [email protected]. Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. Printed in the United States of America. 3970 Sorrento Valley Blvd., Ste. 500, San Diego, CA 92121 Brief Contents Preface xi Acknowledgments xv Introduction 1 1. Ethics Theory: An Overview 6 2. Key Frameworks 22 3. Moral Judgment 40 4. Ethics Theory: Application to Media 61 5. Consumption 81 6. Technology 105 7. Data 126 8. Transparency 146 9. Justice 170 10. Harm 198 11. Autonomy 225 12. Privacy 253 13. Community 281 References 313 Index 333 About the Author 341 iii Contents Preface xi Acknowledgments xv Introduction 1 1 Ethics Theory: An Overview 6 Ethics Defined 7 It’s About the Journey, Not the Destination 10 Trust Your Gut, but Use Your Brain 10 The Art of the Uneasy Compromise 11 Key Thinkers Through the Ages 11 Aristotle 12 Immanuel Kant 12 John Stuart Mill 13 W. D. Ross 14 John Rawls 15 Philippa Foot 15 Seyla Benhabib 16 Kwame Anthony Appiah 17 Martha Nussbaum 18 Intent Versus Consequence, Means Versus Ends 19 For Discussion 20 2 Key Frameworks 22 Virtue Ethics 23 Doctrine of the Mean 25 Virtue as Practice 26 Human Flourishing 27 Duty Ethics 29 v vi | Media Ethics Categorical Imperative 32 Conflicting Duties 33 Consequentialist Ethics 34 Criticisms of Utility in Ethics 37 For Discussion 39 3 Moral Judgment 40 Theories of Moral Development 40 Kohlberg: An Ethic of Justice 41 Gilligan: An Ethic of Care 42 Moral Foundations Theory 45 Ethical Ideologies 52 Implications of a Universal Moral Theory 57 Media Ethics in Digital Life 59 For Discussion 60 4 Ethics Theory: Application to Media 61 Ethics Versus Wrongdoing 62 Rihanna and Snapchat 64 A Checklist for Ethical Reasoning 68 MERITS 68 Values in the Media 70 Credibility 71 Values in Journalism 73 Values in Public Relations 74 Values in Marketing and Advertising 75 For Discussion 80 5 Consumption 81 The Media System 82 Media Literacy 85 News Aggregation 88 News Literacy 89 Media Habits 93 Understanding the News Narrative 94 Exercising the Muscle of Curiosity 95 Connecting Literacy to Ethics 96 Contents | vii How News Empowers Us 97 Perceptions of Bias in the Media 101 Information and Cognition 102 Hostile Media Phenomenon 103 For Discussion 104 6 Technology 105 How We Think About Technology 106 Technological Determinism 107 The Human as a Technological Being 110 The Commercial Soul of the Digital World 111 Commodifying Our Attention 111 What We Do With Media Technology 114 News and Social Media:Valuable Crowdsourcing or Unruly Mob? 117 What Media Technology Does to Us 118 Virtues and Values in Media Technology 123 For Discussion 124 7 Data 126 The Power of Big Data 127 Data Journalism 128 Datamining and Selling Stuff 131 The Power and Perils of Algorithms 136 The Dangers of Datafication 140 Blockchain: A Possible Solution 141 Data Ethics and Media Practice 142 Journalism 143 Public Relations 143 Media Marketing 144 For Discussion 145 8 Transparency 146 Trust and Secrecy 148 Transparency as Respect 150 Case in Point: Plugola for a Pundit 151 Kant: The Principle of Humanity 152 Case in Point Undercover TV in Public Schools 155 viii | Media Ethics Kant: The Theory of Human Dignity 159 Case in Point: Native Advertising 162 Transparency in the Media 163 Journalism and Accountability 164 Case in Point: Product Placement Makes Shows Real, but Is It Ethical? 165 Being Aboveboard in Public Relations 166 Advertising: Authenticity or Deception? 166 Generating Buzz in the Blogosphere 168 For Discussion 169 9 Justice 170 Case in Point: Froot Loops, Cocoa Puffs, and Ads Targeting Kids 173 Justice as Desert 175 Justice as Equality 177 Justice as Fairness 178 Case in Point: With Google Flu Trends, Mistaking Data for Knowledge 179 Rawls and Utilitarianism 180 Rawls and a Theory of Justice 181 The Veil of Ignorance 182 The First Principle: Maximum Liberty for Everyone 184 The Second Principle:Distribution Favoring the Disadvantaged 185 The Power of Rawlsian Justice 186 The Value of Rawls for Ethics 187 Feminist Objections to Rawls’s Claims 188 Justice as Fairness in the Media 189 Case in Point: Moira Donegan and #MeToo Journalism 190 Confusion Over What’s “Fair” in Journalism 191 Dialogue and Dissemination 193 Case in Point: Greenwashing 194 Branding and Justice in Ads 195 For Discussion 197 10 Harm 198 What Constitutes “Harm”? 201 “Setting Back” Interests and “Wronging” Others 203 Harm as Culturally Bound Concept 206 Case in Point: Using Sex to Sell Stuff 208 Graphic Images in the News 209 Contents | ix Case in Point: Cutting Off the Lifeblood of Online Hate 213 “Harm” More Precisely Defined 215 Case in Point: Crowdsourced News Tests Limits in Boston Bombings 217 Mill’s Harm Principle 218 When Concern for Harm and Other Duties Conflict 221 Case in Point: Datamining Shopper Behavior—Invaluable or Invasive? 221 For Discussion 224 11 Autonomy 225 Case in Point: Drug Ad Overdose—From Cholesterol to Erectile Dysfunction 227 Freedom and Autonomy 228 Do We Have Free Will? 230 Autonomy as the Highest Good? 230 Autonomy as “Positive” Freedom 232 Moral Autonomy 235 Kant: Autonomy in the Service of Duty 235 Case in Point: The Gun Owner Next Door—Rage Over an Interactive Map 236 Autonomy and Natural Law 237 Autonomous Agency and the Media 238 Freedom of Expression 240 Case in Point: Concussions & Conflicts of Interest—Bob Costas, NBC Sports, and the NFL 241 Journalistic Independence 242 Individual-Level Conflict of Interest 243 Corporate-Level Conflict of Interest 244 Autonomy for Public Relations Professionals 246 Wanted: A Public Relations Seat at the Executive Table 246 Case in Point: Public Relations as “Corporate Conscience”? 247 Case in Point: NASA’s Public Relations Crises of Challenger and Columbia 248 Journalists: Cultivating an Online “Brand” 250 For Discussion 252 12 Privacy 253 Privacy Defined 257 Deconstructing the “Right” to Privacy 259 Case in Point: Covering the Moment of Death in War 260 The Moral Value of Privacy 262 Development of the Self 262 x | Media Ethics Maintenance of the Social Fabric 264 Case in Point: Do Geofences Corral Customer Loyalty? 265 The History of Privacy 266 Privacy in the Media 269 Case in Point: NASCAR and Dale Earnhardt’s Autopsy Photos 270 The Role of Privacy in the News 271 Legal Aspects
Recommended publications
  • The "Urgrundrecht'?: Human Dignity, Moral
    IS THE RIGHT TO LIFE OR IS ANOTHER RIGHT THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHT – THE “URGRUNDRECHT”?: HUMAN DIGNITY, MORAL OBLIGATIONS, NATURAL RIGHTS, AND POSITIVE LAW Josef Seifert Abstract: Moral obligations and basic human rights must be distinguished from each other and from positive rights and laws. Ethics and basic human rights rest on human dignity. The right to life is shown to be a natural and “absolute right,” but it is also in a certain sense the absolutely foundational concrete human right (Urgrundrecht) grounded in ontological dignity: all other human rights presuppose necessarily human life while human life has no more fundamental foundation in other goods but constitutes their ground. Other ideas about the most foundational right (such as the habeas corpus) are less foundational for the reason that they are more insignificant, can be suspended, are not immune to emergency states, such that their violation is not under all circumstances a grave violation. Moreover, they presuppose the right to life. These rights also refer only to a small sector of humanity, not applying to babies or comatose patients. The right to life is held by all human beings without exception, it is unrenounceable. For these and many other reasons the right to life is in an important sense the most fundamental right, in accordance with the first point of view for determining which is the most basic human right: Which right refers to the most basic good that is the condition of all others? However, there are two other points of view to determine the most basic right: The second point of view is expressed in the question: “Which human right is the most universal and comprehensive one and includes all others?” This is not true of the right to life which does not say anything about any other right.
    [Show full text]
  • A Content Analysis of Ethical Statements Within Journalistic Codes of Conduct
    A Content Analysis of Ethical Statements within Journalistic Codes of Conduct A thesis presented to the faculty of the Scripps College of Communication of Ohio University and the Institute for Communication and Media Studies of Leipzig University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees Master of Science in Journalism (Ohio University), Master of Arts in Global Mass Communication (Leipzig University) David B. D. Neri August 2020 © 2020 David B. D. Neri. All Rights Reserved. This thesis titled A Content Analysis of Ethical Statements within Journalistic Codes of Conduct by DAVID B. D. NERI has been approved for the E.W. Scripps School of Journalism, the Scripps College of Communication, and the Institute for Communication and Media Studies by Bernhard S. Debatin Professor of Journalism of The E.W. Scripps School of Journalism Scott Titsworth Dean, Scripps College of Communication, Ohio University Christian Pieter Hoffman Director, Institute for Communication and Media Studies, Leipzig University ii Abstract NERI, DAVID B. D., M.S., Journalism; M.A., Global Mass Communication, August 2020 3755338 A Content Analysis of Ethical Statements within Journalistic Codes of Ethics Director of Thesis: Bernhard S. Debatin Committee Members: Bill Reader, Rosanna Planer Although previous research has been targeted at the aspects of journalistic cultures within nations through the views of their population, such as the multinational Worlds of Journalism Study (2019), other avenues of study can offer a new perspective on these differences. To this end, the study provides a comparison of journalistic codes of ethics. Such codes (while differing in structure, implementation, and reach) share a common purpose in providing and defining standards of ethical action within the field of journalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalistic Ethics and the Right-Wing Media Jason Mccoy University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Professional Projects from the College of Journalism Journalism and Mass Communications, College of and Mass Communications Spring 4-18-2019 Journalistic Ethics and the Right-Wing Media Jason McCoy University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismprojects Part of the Broadcast and Video Studies Commons, Communication Technology and New Media Commons, Critical and Cultural Studies Commons, Journalism Studies Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Other Communication Commons McCoy, Jason, "Journalistic Ethics and the Right-Wing Media" (2019). Professional Projects from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications. 20. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismprojects/20 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Journalism and Mass Communications, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Professional Projects from the College of Journalism and Mass Communications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Journalistic Ethics and the Right-Wing Media Jason Mccoy University of Nebraska-Lincoln This paper will examine the development of modern media ethics and will show that this set of guidelines can and perhaps should be revised and improved to match the challenges of an economic and political system that has taken advantage of guidelines such as “objective reporting” by creating too many false equivalencies. This paper will end by providing a few reforms that can create a better media environment and keep the public better informed. As it was important for journalism to improve from partisan media to objective reporting in the past, it is important today that journalism improves its practices to address the right-wing media’s attack on journalism and avoid too many false equivalencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethics and Its Relation to the Media Sean Mcgowan College of Dupage
    ESSAI Volume 7 Article 34 4-1-2010 Ethics and Its Relation to the Media Sean McGowan College of DuPage Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai Recommended Citation McGowan, Sean (2009) "Ethics and Its Relation to the Media," ESSAI: Vol. 7, Article 34. Available at: http://dc.cod.edu/essai/vol7/iss1/34 This Selection is brought to you for free and open access by the College Publications at [email protected].. It has been accepted for inclusion in ESSAI by an authorized administrator of [email protected].. For more information, please contact [email protected]. McGowan: Ethics and Its Relation to the Media Ethics and Its Relation to the Media by Sean McGowan (Philosophy 1110) oday in the media, there is a deep urgency with most reporters to dive into a story and develop as much detail as possible. However, what other factors are important to consider in Tjournalism? If taking an ethical approach, one could see where a career in journalism can be accompanied by certain moral obligations. How can the media today be certain that it is holding to its ethical responsibilities; however, without first having those responsibilities identified? As stated in The Media and Morality, by Robert M. Baird, William E. Loges, and Stuart E. Rosenbaum, “Lawyers and architects have their clients, doctors their patients, and teachers their students. But to whom are the media’s professionals obligated?” (Baird, Loges, and Rosenbaum 11). One can see from this explanation where ethics can be a complex subject in the media.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition Booklet
    Religious Studies Year 11-12 Bridging Project Welcome to Religious Studies at A Level! Now that you’ve decided to study Religious Studies at A level, you’ll need to do a bit of preparation. This pack contains activities and resources to prepare you to start your A level in September. It is aimed to be used throughout the rest of the summer term and over the summer holidays to ensure you are ready to start your course in September. When you arrive to your first lesson in September you should also bring a folder, lined paper, dividers and plastic wallets. This course is split into 3 components: 1. Study of a Religion (Hinduism) 2. Ethics 3. Philosophy The resources include: A task for each of the three components. Including research, podcasts, reviews, questions and videos. There is also some suggested tasks to complete and books you could read. 1. Study of a Religion The religion you will be studying is Hinduism. Please read through this article https://www.hinduamerican.org/blog/12-things-you- need-to-know-about-hinduism/ from the article add a list of key terms and definitions you think will be useful for the course. You could also watch the following BBC documentary on Gandhi. Watch all 3 episodes and make notes on what Gandhi believed and why he was so important to the development of modern India. https://youtu.be/TQNbHVjC0sQ 2. Ethics Use the following website to choose a podcast that interests you. Listen to the podcast and write a review below. Think about the ethical issues that arise and arguments for and against the issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Ethics at IIMC
    “Media Ethics” * G.N. Ray “ Let noble thoughts come to us from every side” is the eternal message of the Rigveda given several millennia ago signifying the freedom of expression. The modern democratic edifice has been constructed drawing on the above and the individual liberty of expression of thought as the supreme principle. 'Journalism', the concrete form of this expression has grown in power over a period of time. It has become a coveted profession amongst the present day career conscious youth and I am sure I find here today a most promising group many of whom will surely find place amongst the leading journalists in the years to come. The fundamental objective of journalism is to serve the people with news, views, comments and information on matters of public interest in a fair, accurate, unbiased: and decent manner and language. In 1948 the United Nations made the Universal Declaration of Human Rights laying down certain freedoms for the mankind. Article 19 of the Declaration enunciates the most basic of these freedoms, thus: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression’, the right includes the freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek and receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”. *‘Media Ethics’: Address by Chairman, Press Council of India on 18th January 2007 at IIMC, Dhenkanal, Orissa. Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution of India guarantees to the citizen, the right to “Freedom of speech and expression”. The press is an indispensable pillar of democracy. It purveys public opinion and shapes it.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis Conscience
    CRISIS OF CONSCIENCE Perspectives on Journalism Ethics I CARLHAUSMAN ! New York University Sponsoring/Executive/Senior Editor: Melissa A. Rosati Project Editor: Thomas A. Farrell Design Supervisor/Cover Design: Stacey Agin Production Administrator: Paula Keller Compositor: Publishing Synthesis, Ltd. Printer and Binder: R. R. Donnelley & Sons Company Cover Printer: The Lehigh Press, Inc. For permission to use copyrighted material, grateful acknowledgment is made to the copyright holders on page 205, which is hereby made part of this copyright page. Crisis of Conscience: Perspectives on Journalism Ethics Copyright © 1992 by HarperCollins Publishers Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For informa- tion address HarperCollins Publishers Inc., 10 East 53rd Street, New York, NY 10022. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hausman, Carl, (date)- Crisis of conscience : perspectives on journalism ethics / Carl Hausman. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-06-500365-9 1. Journalistic ethics. 2. Journalism—Objectivity. I. Title. PN4756.H38 1992 174'.9097-dc20 91-28064 CIP 91 92 93 94 987654321 Contents Preface vii PART ONE THE PREMISE 1 Chapter 1 Evolution of Modern Journalism 3 Chapter 2 On Reflection: Ethics and Its Relevance to Modern Society 13 PART TWO PRINCIPLES 25 Chapter 3 Accuracy and Objectivity 27 Chapter
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Rights and the Roles of Virtues, Perfectionism, and Cultural Progress
    The Law of Education: Educational Rights and the Roles of Virtues, Perfectionism, and Cultural Progress R. GEORGE WRIGHT* I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 385 II. EDUCATION: PURPOSES, RECENT OUTCOMES, AND LEGAL MECHANISMS FOR REFORM ................................................................ 391 A. EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES AND RIGHTS LANGUAGE ...................... 391 B. SOME RECENT GROUNDS FOR CONCERN IN FULFILLING EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ............................................................. 393 C. THE BROAD RANGE OF AVAILABLE TECHNIQUES FOR THE LEGAL REFORM OF EDUCATION ............................................................... 395 III. SOME LINKAGES BETWEEN EDUCATION AND THE BASIC VIRTUES, PERFECTIONISM, AND CULTURAL PROGRESS ..................................... 397 IV. VIRTUES AND THEIR LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ...................................................................... 401 V. PERFECTIONISM AND ITS LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM ...................................................................... 410 VI. CULTURAL PROGRESS OVER TIME AND ITS LEGITIMATE PROMOTION THROUGH THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM .............................................. 417 VII. CONCLUSION: EDUCATION LAW AS RIGHTS-CENTERED AND AS THE PURSUIT OF WORTHY VALUES AND GOALS: THE EXAMPLE OF HORNE V. FLORES ............................................................................................ 431 I. INTRODUCTION The law of education
    [Show full text]
  • Anscombe, Foot, and Contemporary Virtue Ethics
    J Value Inquiry (2010) 44:209–224 DOI 10.1007/s10790-010-9218-0 Virtue Ethics without Right Action: Anscombe, Foot, and Contemporary Virtue Ethics John Hacker-Wright Published online: 5 March 2010 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 1 Introduction Working out a criterion of morally right action is central to developing virtue ethics.1 Most advocates of virtue ethics believe that achieving such a criterion is crucial to vindicating virtue ethics as a normative theory. Yet the centrality of this task marks a departure from the views of at least some of the philosophers credited with the revival of virtue ethics in the twentieth century, especially from the views of G.E.M. Anscombe and Philippa Foot. Anscombe especially has sharp criticisms of the way philosophers handle the concept of morally right action along with related concepts like moral obligation. Yet the work of contemporary virtue ethicists such as Rosalind Hursthouse, Michael Slote, and Christine Swanton features little discussion of Anscombe’s criticisms or the reasons that the other virtue revivalists avoided providing a criterion of moral rightness. The dominant assumption appears to be that the earlier virtue revivalists neglect establishing a criterion of morally right action because their concern is to give priority to the evaluation of an agent over his acts as a corrective to the exclusive attention given to act-evaluation in the moral philosophy of the time. For Anscombe and Foot, at least, the concern to give priority to agent-evaluation is not among their motives for advocating a return to virtues.2 Instead, they believe that moral philosophers from the modern period forward have given the terms ‘‘right’’ and ‘‘ought’’ an artificial and incoherent sense.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Cybersecurity Ethics MODULE AUTHOR: Shannon Vallor, Ph.D
    An Introduction to Cybersecurity Ethics MODULE AUTHOR: Shannon Vallor, Ph.D. William J. Rewak, S.J. Professor of Philosophy, Santa Clara University TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 2-6 PART ONE: What are the important ethical issues in cybersecurity? 7-12 Case Study 1 13-15 PART TWO: Common ethical challenges for cybersecurity professionals 15-21 Case Study 2 21-24 Case Study 3 24-28 PART THREE: What are cybersecurity professionals’ obligations to the public? 29-34 Case Study 4 34-38 PART FOUR: What ethical frameworks can guide cybersecurity practice? 38-47 PART FIVE: What are ethical best practices in cybersecurity? 48-56 Case Study 5 57-60 Case Study 6 60-61 APPENDIX A: Relevant Professional Ethics Codes & Guidelines (Links) 62 APPENDIX B: Bibliography/Further Reading 63-65 1 An Introduction to Cybersecurity Ethics MODULE AUTHOR: Shannon Vallor, Ph.D. William J. Rewak, S.J. Professor of Philosophy, Santa Clara University 1. What do we mean when we talk about ‘ethics’? Ethics in the broadest sense refers to the concern that humans have always had for figuring out how best to live. The philosopher Socrates is quoted as saying in 399 B.C. that “the most important thing is not life, but the good life.”1 We would all like to avoid a bad life, one that is shameful and sad, fundamentally lacking in worthy achievements, unredeemed by love, kindness, beauty, friendship, courage, honor, joy, or grace. Yet what is the best way to obtain the opposite of this – a life that is not only acceptable, but even excellent and worthy of admiration? How do we identify a good life, one worth choosing from among all the different ways of living that lay open to us? This is the question that the study of ethics attempts to answer.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Bernard Williams's Criticism of Aristotelian Naturalism
    UNDERSTANDING BERNARD WILLIAMS’S CRITICISM OF ARISTOTELIAN NATURALISM Michael Addison A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of MPhil at the University of St Andrews 2015 Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/9315 This item is protected by original copyright Understanding Bernard Williams’s Criticism of Aristotelian Naturalism. Michael Addison This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of MPhil at the University of St Andrews 19th November 2015 Abstract: In Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy (henceforth ELP) Williams claims that holding a naturalistic Aristotelian ethical theory is no longer an option for us—we cannot believe what Aristotle believed about human beings. It is the purpose of this thesis to understand what Williams means by this claim and to evaluate whether or not it constitutes a pressing argument against Aristotelian naturalism. The modern Aristotelian (represented here by Martha Nussbaum, Philippa Foot and Rosalind Hursthouse) seems to be untouched by the claim as presented—they do not have to hold Aristotle’s view of human nature. The Aristotelian approaches human nature, not from an “outside” perspective, like the scientist, but from an “inside” perspective—from the point of view of an ethically engaged agent. The method does not seek to use a theory-independent notion of human nature to vindicate the Aristotelian claim that the properly functioning human being is virtuous. Rather, the Aristotelian is engaged in a project of using the notions of virtue that we already possess, to paint a picture of the kind of lives that we can all identify with, and endorse as properly functioning.
    [Show full text]
  • Chastity As a Virtue
    religions Article Chastity as a Virtue Hwa Yeong Wang College of Confucian Studies and Eastern Philosophy, Sungkyunkwan University, 25-2, Seonggyungwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03063, Korea; [email protected] Received: 26 April 2020; Accepted: 18 May 2020; Published: 21 May 2020 Abstract: This paper analyzes two philosophers’ views on chastity as a virtue, comparing Song Siyeol, a Korean neo-Confucian philosopher of the east, and David Hume, a Scottish philosopher. Despite the importance in and impact on women’s lives, chastity has been understated in religio-philosophical fields. The two philosophers’ understandings and arguments differ in significant ways and yet share important common aspects. Analyzing the views of Song and Hume helps us better understand and approach the issue of women’s chastity, not only as a historical phenomenon but also in the contemporary world, more fully and deeply. The analysis will provide an alternative way to re-appropriate the concept of chastity as a virtue. Keywords: chastity; Song Siyeol; David Hume; virtue; gender; Korean neo-Confucianism 1. Introduction Chastity, understood as a commitment or disposition to remain innocent of extramarital sexual intercourse, has been considered a virtue among human beings for a long time, not only in traditional societies but in contemporary societies as well.1 The value of chastity has been recognized since very early times and regardless of geographical location; it was an important virtue in ancient Greece and China, for example. This duty of chastity remains widespread in contemporary societies, which, in general, take monogamy as the moral standard regarding intimate human relationships. In a number of countries, the violation of chastity is recognized as unlawful and has consequences within the penal system.2 The virtue of chastity, however, has been discussed one-sidedly and almost always as “female” chastity.
    [Show full text]