Toxicological Profile for Sulfur Mustard (Update)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toxicological Profile for Sulfur Mustard (Update) TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR SULFUR MUSTARD (UPDATE) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry September 2003 SULFUR MUSTARD ii DISCLAIMER The use of company or product name(s) is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. SULFUR MUSTARD iii UPDATE STATEMENT A Toxicological Profile for Sulfur Mustard (previously Mustard Gas), Draft for Public Comment was released in September 2001. This edition supersedes any previously released draft or final profile. Toxicological profiles are revised and republished as necessary. For information regarding the update status of previously released profiles, contact ATSDR at: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Division of Toxicology/Toxicology Information Branch 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop E-29 Atlanta, GA 30333 SULFUR MUSTARD vii QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS Toxicological Profiles are a unique compilation of toxicological information on a given hazardous substance. Each profile reflects a comprehensive and extensive evaluation, summary, and interpretation of available toxicologic and epidemiologic information on a substance. Health care providers treating patients potentially exposed to hazardous substances will find the following information helpful for fast answers to often-asked questions. Primary Chapters/Sections of Interest Chapter 1: Public Health Statement: The Public Health Statement can be a useful tool for educating patients about possible exposure to a hazardous substance. It explains a substance’s relevant toxicologic properties in a nontechnical, question-and-answer format, and it includes a review of the general health effects observed following exposure. Chapter 2: Relevance to Public Health: The Relevance to Public Health Section evaluates, interprets, and assesses the significance of toxicity data to human health. Chapter 3: Health Effects: Specific health effects of a given hazardous compound are reported by type of health effect (death, systemic, immunologic, reproductive), by route of exposure, and by length of exposure (acute, intermediate, and chronic). In addition, both human and animal studies are reported in this section. NOTE: Not all health effects reported in this section are necessarily observed in the clinical setting. Please refer to the Public Health Statement to identify general health effects observed following exposure. Pediatrics: Four new sections have been added to each Toxicological Profile to address child health issues: Section 1.6 How Can (Chemical X) Affect Children? Section 1.7 How Can Families Reduce the Risk of Exposure to (Chemical X)? Section 3.7 Children’s Susceptibility Section 6.6 Exposures of Children Other Sections of Interest: Section 3.8 Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect Section 3.11 Methods for Reducing Toxic Effects ATSDR Information Center Phone: 1-888-42-ATSDR or (404) 498-0110 Fax: (404) 498-0093 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov The following additional material can be ordered through the ATSDR Information Center: Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Taking an Exposure History—The importance of taking an exposure history and how to conduct one are described, and an example of a thorough exposure history is provided. Other case studies of interest include Reproductive and Developmental SULFUR MUSTARD viii Hazards; Skin Lesions and Environmental Exposures; Cholinesterase-Inhibiting Pesticide Toxicity; and numerous chemical-specific case studies. Managing Hazardous Materials Incidents is a three-volume set of recommendations for on-scene (prehospital) and hospital medical management of patients exposed during a hazardous materials incident. Volumes I and II are planning guides to assist first responders and hospital emergency department personnel in planning for incidents that involve hazardous materials. Volume III— Medical Management Guidelines for Acute Chemical Exposures—is a guide for health care professionals treating patients exposed to hazardous materials. Fact Sheets (ToxFAQs) provide answers to frequently asked questions about toxic substances. Other Agencies and Organizations The National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH) focuses on preventing or controlling disease, injury, and disability related to the interactions between people and their environment outside the workplace. Contact: NCEH, Mailstop F-29, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724 • Phone: 770-488-7000 • FAX: 770-488-7015. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducts research on occupational diseases and injuries, responds to requests for assistance by investigating problems of health and safety in the workplace, recommends standards to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), and trains professionals in occupational safety and health. Contact: NIOSH, 200 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20201 • Phone: 800-356-4674 or NIOSH Technical Information Branch, Robert A. Taft Laboratory, Mailstop C-19, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998 • Phone: 800-35-NIOSH. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) is the principal federal agency for biomedical research on the effects of chemical, physical, and biologic environmental agents on human health and well-being. Contact: NIEHS, PO Box 12233, 104 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 • Phone: 919-541-3212. Referrals The Association of Occupational and Environmental Clinics (AOEC) has developed a network of clinics in the United States to provide expertise in occupational and environmental issues. Contact: AOEC, 1010 Vermont Avenue, NW, #513, Washington, DC 20005 • Phone: 202-347-4976 • FAX: 202-347-4950 • e-mail: [email protected] • Web Page: http://www.aoec.org/. The American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) is an association of physicians and other health care providers specializing in the field of occupational and environmental medicine. Contact: ACOEM, 55 West Seegers Road, Arlington Heights, IL 60005 • Phone: 847-818-1800 • FAX: 847-818-9266. SULFUR MUSTARD ix CONTRIBUTORS CHEMICAL MANAGER(S)/AUTHOR(S): Zemoria A. Rosemond, B.A. ATSDR, Division of Toxicology, Atlanta, GA Dolores A. Beblo, Ph.D. Syracuse Research Corporation, North Syracuse, NY Richard Amata, Ph.D. Syracuse Research Corporation, North Syracuse, NY THE PROFILE HAS UNDERGONE THE FOLLOWING ATSDR INTERNAL REVIEWS: 1. Health Effects Review. The Health Effects Review Committee examines the health effects chapter of each profile for consistency and accuracy in interpreting health effects and classifying end points. 2. Minimal Risk Level Review. The Minimal Risk Level Workgroup considers issues relevant to substance-specific minimal risk levels (MRLs), reviews the health effects database of each profile, and makes recommendations for derivation of MRLs. 3. Data Needs Review. The Research Implementation Branch reviews data needs sections to assure consistency across profiles and adherence to instructions in the Guidance. SULFUR MUSTARD xi PEER REVIEW A peer review panel was assembled for sulfur mustard. The panel consisted of the following members: 1. Dr. Vincent Garry, M.D. D.A.B.T., Director, Laboratory of Environmental Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota; 2. Dr. Shane Que Hee, Ph.D., Professor, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California; and 3. Dr. James Withey, Ph.D., Retired Senior Research Scientist, Environmental Health Science Center, Ontario, Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. These experts collectively have knowledge of sulfur mustard's physical and chemical properties, toxicokinetics, key health end points, mechanisms of action, human and animal exposure, and quantification of risk to humans. All reviewers were selected in conformity with the conditions for peer review specified in Section 104(I)(13) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended. Scientists from the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) have reviewed the peer reviewers' comments and determined which comments will be included in the profile. A listing of the peer reviewers' comments not incorporated in the profile, with a brief explanation of the rationale for their exclusion, exists as part of the administrative record for this compound. A list of databases reviewed and a list of unpublished documents cited are also included in the administrative record. The citation of the peer review panel should not be understood to imply its approval of the profile's final content. The responsibility for the content of this profile lies with the ATSDR. SULFUR MUSTARD xiii CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ..............................................................................................................................................ii UPDATE STATEMENT .............................................................................................................................iii FOREWORD ................................................................................................................................................v QUICK REFERENCE FOR HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS....................................................................vii CONTRIBUTORS.......................................................................................................................................ix
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Mimosine Administered to a Perfused Area of Skin in Angora Goats by R
    Downloaded from British Journal of Nutrition (1996), 15, 69-19 69 https://www.cambridge.org/core Effects of mimosine administered to a perfused area of skin in Angora goats BY R. PUCHALA, S. G. PIERZYNOWSKI, T. SAHLU* AND S. P. HART E. (Kika) de la Garza Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, Oklahoma 73050, USA . IP address: (Received I1 November 1994 - Revised 15 March 1995 -Accepted I1 May 1995) 170.106.34.90 The effect of mimosine on a perfused area of skin tissue was studied using an isolated perfusion technique. Four mature Angora wethers (body weight 35 (SE 2.3) kg) were cannulated bilaterally with indwelling silicone catheters in the superficial branches of the deep circumflex iliac artery and vein. Mimosine , on (40 mg/kg metabolic weight (Wo75)per d) was infused intra-arterially into one iliac artery of each goat for 3 d and saline was infused in the contralateral (control) iliac artery. Iliac venous blood samples were 27 Sep 2021 at 22:01:16 taken from both sides along with arterial samples from the carotid artery. Mimosine infusion elevated plasma mimosine in the carotid artery (52.6 (SEM19.21) pol/l) and iliac vein on the saline-treated side to 54.1 (SEM 16-31)~ol/l and in the iliac vein on the mimosine-treated side to 191.3 (SEM1914) pmol/l (P < 0.01). Mimosine decreased feed intake (2.3 v. 0.6 kg/d, ~~~0.29;P < 0.001) and water consumption (5-2 v. 1.3 litres/d, SEM 0.67; P < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Review on the Nutritive Value and Toxic Aspects of Leucaena Leucocephala
    Trop Anim Prod 1979 4:2 113 A REVIEW ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUE AND TOXIC ASPECTS OF LEUCAENA LEUCOCEPHALA U ter Meulen1, S Struck1, E Schulke2 and E A El Harith1 1 Institut fur Tierphysiologie und Tierernahrung der Universitat Gottingen Oskar-Kellner-Weg 6, Weende 3400 Gottingen, West Germany This review discusses the nutritive value of Leucaena leucocephala and its mimosine toxicity when used as a forage for livestock. Chemical analysis and feeding trial. have indicated that Leucaena leaf-meal with its high protein, calcium, -carotene and xanthophyll contents, is potentially a valuable feed for livestock in the tropics. The symptoms of mimosine toxicity in cattle, sheep, poultry, goats horses, pigs and rats ire discussed, The chemical value of mimosine and the possible mechanism of its toxicity are reviewed. Possible solutions to the toxicity problem are presented together with the suggestion that further studies be initiated to overcome this problem. Key Words: Leucaena, mimosine toxicity, livestock, forage, feeding trials The uses of the tropical legume Leucaena leucocephala are quite versatile. These uses include its function as a source of firewood and timber,its role in soil erosion control (Dijkman 1950), its ability to provide shade for other plants as well as its function in maintaining the fertility of the soil and of serving as a nutritious forage for animal feed (Ruskln 1977). Presently the greatest use of this plant in animal nutrition is its incorporation in cattle feed. Leucaena leaf-meal, with its rich protein, minerals and vitamin content, is also becoming a popular ingredient in poultry feeds in the tropics (D'Mello and Taplin 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical Weapons Conventions at 1
    Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 ½ Amy E. Smithson Report No. 25 September 1998 Copyright© 1998 11 Dupont Circle, NW Ninth Floor Washington, DC 20036 phone 202.223.5956 fax 202.238.9604 http://www.stimson.org email [email protected] Rudderless: The Chemical Weapons Convention At 1 1/2 Amy E. Smithson INTRODUCTION On the 29th of April 1997, the majority of the world’s nations joined to activate an arms control and nonproliferation accord that will gradually compel the elimination of one of the most abhorred classes of weapons of all times. Previously, the international community had fallen short of the mark in efforts to try to abolish poison gas, despite the opprobrium following its widespread use in World War I.1 The new Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) extends the no use-prohibitions of the 1925 Geneva Protocol2 to outlaw the development, acquisition, production, transfer, and stockpiling of chemical weapons as well. The CWC requires the destruction of chemical weapons production facilities and arsenals over a ten-year period, and countries will witness the shrinking numbers of poison gas factories and munitions. A less tangible function of the CWC, but one that may turn out to be equally valued over the long term is that the CWC will help redefine how states assure their national security. The CWC requires nations to declare activities that were previously considered state secrets and private business information. The treaty authorizes routine and challenge inspections to monitor compliance with its prohibitions. Instead of building large caches of arms, the CWC’s verification processes give governments reason to be confident that managed transparency—a limited waiver of state sovereignty—can enhance national and international security.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Renal Methylarginine Metabolism Protects Against Progressive Kidney Damage
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Reduced Renal Methylarginine Metabolism Protects against Progressive Kidney Damage † James A.P. Tomlinson,* Ben Caplin, Olga Boruc,* Claire Bruce-Cobbold,* Pedro Cutillas,* † ‡ Dirk Dormann,* Peter Faull,* Rebecca C. Grossman, Sanjay Khadayate,* Valeria R. Mas, † | Dorothea D. Nitsch,§ Zhen Wang,* Jill T. Norman, Christopher S. Wilcox, † David C. Wheeler, and James Leiper* *Medical Research Council Clinical Sciences Centre, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom; †Centre for Nephrology, UCL Medical School Royal Free, London, United Kingdom; ‡Translational Genomics Transplant Laboratory, Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; §Department of Non-communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; and |Hypertension, Kidney and Vascular Research Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC ABSTRACT Nitric oxide (NO) production is diminished in many patients with cardiovascular and renal disease. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) is an endogenous inhibitor of NO synthesis, and elevated plasma levels of ADMA are associated with poor outcomes. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase-1 (DDAH1) is a methylarginine- metabolizing enzyme that reduces ADMA levels. We reported previously that a DDAH1 gene variant associated with increased renal DDAH1 mRNA transcription and lower plasma ADMA levels, but counterintuitively, a steeper rate of renal function decline. Here, we test the hypothesis that reduced renal-specific
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Hydrofera Blue™ on a Chemical Burn By
    Case Study: The Use of Hydrofera Blue™ on a Chemical Burn by Cyhalothrin Jeanne Alvarez, FNP, CWS Independent Medical Associates, Bangor, ME History of Present Illness/Injury: This 70 year old white male was spraying a product containing cyhalothrin (Hot Shot Home Insect Control) overhead to kill spiders. Some of the product dripped and came in contact with his skin in five locations on his upper right arm and hand. He states he washed his arm and hand with copious amounts of soap and water right after the contact of the product on his skin. He presented to the office for evaluation four days after the incidence complaining of burning pain, paresthesia and blistering at the sites. A colleague initially saw this patient and contacted poison control who provided information regarding the procedure for decontamination and monitoring. Prolonged exposure can cause symptoms similar to frostbite. Paresthesia related to dermal exposure is reported but there was no available guidance for treatment options for the blistered areas and/or treatment options for the paresthesia given. Washing the contact area with soap and water was indicated by the guidelines. Past Medical History: This patient has a significant history of hypertension. Medications/Allergies: This patient takes Norvasc 10mg daily. He has used Tylenol 1000mg every 4-6 hours as needed for pain without significant improvement in his pain level. He has no known allergies. Treatments: Day 4 (after exposure): The patient presented for evaluation after a dermal chemical exposure complaining of burning pain, blisters and paresthesia. He had washed the area after exposure with soap and water and had applied a triple antibiotic ointment.
    [Show full text]
  • By Norepinephrine and Inactivated by NO and Cgmp (Medial Basal Hypothalami/Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone/Camp/Arginine/Nitroarginine Methyl Ester) G
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 4246-4250, April 1996 Physiology Nitric oxide synthase content of hypothalamic explants: Increased by norepinephrine and inactivated by NO and cGMP (medial basal hypothalami/luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone/cAMP/arginine/nitroarginine methyl ester) G. CANTEROS*, V. RErroRI*, A. GENARO*, A. SUBURO*, M. GIMENO*, AND S. M. MCCANNtt *Centro de Estudios Farmacologicos y Botanicos, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Serrano 665, 1414 Buenos Aires, Argentina; and tPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, 6400 Perkins Road, Baton Rouge, LA 70808-4124 Contributed by S. M. McCann, December 26, 1995 ABSTRACT Release of luteinizing hormone (LH)- pituitary gland. There it releases LH, which induces ovulation releasing hormone (LHRH), the hypothalamic peptide that and ovarian steroid secretion in females and testosterone controls release of LH from the adenohypophysis, is con- secretion in males (3). Since NO controls LHRH release in the trolled by NO. There is a rich plexus of nitric oxide synthase arcuate nucleus-median eminence region, where axons of (NOS)-containing neurons and fibers in the lateral median LHRH neurons terminate on the portal capillaries (2), we eminence, intermingled with terminals of the LHRH neurons. expected to find NOergic neurons in this region. Indeed, in the To study relations between NOS and LHRH in this brain present study we found a large number of NOergic cell bodies region, we measured NOS activity in incubated medial basal and fibers in the arcuate-median eminence region. hypothalamus (MBH). NOS converts [l4C]arginine to equimo- This study was initiated to determine if we could measure lar quantities of [14C]citrulline plus NO, which rapidly decom- NOS activity in incubated medial basal hypothalami (MBHs) poses.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,962,619 B2 Ashwell Et Al
    USOO8962619B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,962,619 B2 Ashwell et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Feb. 24, 2015 (54) SUBSTITUTED (58) Field of Classification Search MIDAZOPYRIDINYL-AMNOPYRIDINE None COMPOUNDS See application file for complete search history. (71) Applicant: ArCule, Inc., Woburn, MA (US) (56) References Cited U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS (72) Inventors: Mark A. Ashwell, Carlisle, MA (US); Chris Brassard, Somerville, MA (US); 4,522,811 A 6/1985 Eppstein et al. Anton Filikov, Rockville, MD (US); 33. R: ck 3. RileyShWell f et alal. ............... 514,303 ason Hill. Auburndale, MA (US); Steffi 8,609.688 B2 * 12/2013 Ashwell et al. ............... 514,303 Koerner, Medford, MA (US); 2002/0151549 A1 10/2002 Hayakawa et al. Jean-Marc Lapierre, Pelham, NH (US); 2006/0035921 A1 2/2006 Castelhano et al. Yanbin Liu, Acton, MA (US); Nivedita 2007. O142369 A1 6/2007 van Heek et al. 2007,0254.868 A1 11/2007 Lauffer et al. Namdev, Westford, MA (US); Robert 2009/0253734 A1 10/2009 Kelly, III et al. Nicewonger, Tyngsboro, MA (US); 2011/0059936 A1 3/2011 Lauffer et al. Rocio Palma, North Andover, MA (US); 2011/0172203 A1 7, 2011 Ashwell et al. Manish Tandon, Framingham, MA 2012/0329793 A1* 12/2012 Ashwell et al. ............ 514,234.2 (US); David Vensel, Brookline, MA (US); Akihisa Matsuda, Tokyo (JP); FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Shin Iimura, Tokyo (JP); Kenichi CN 1824665 A 8, 2006 Yoshida, Tokyo (JP); Takanori DE 3722.992 A1 1, 1989 Yamazaki, Tokyo (JP); Takahiro P 12: A. 3. E. Kitamura, Tokyo (JP); Takeshi JP 200034.4780 A 12/2000 Isoyama, Tokyo (JP) KR 20090007347 U 7, 2009 WO WO-96.19991 A1 T 1996 (73) Assignee: ArCule, Inc., Woburn, MA (US) WO WO-99.57 103 A1 11, 1999 WO WO-03.08.0125 A2 10/2003 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO-03080610 A1 10, 2003 WO WO-03O88967 A1 10, 2003 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO-20050117OO A1 2/2005 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • S-Nitrosylation Drives Cell Senescence and Aging in Mammals By
    S-nitrosylation drives cell senescence and aging in PNAS PLUS mammals by controlling mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy Salvatore Rizzaa,1, Simone Cardacib,1, Costanza Montagnaa,c,1, Giuseppina Di Giacomod,2, Daniela De Zioa, Matteo Bordid, Emiliano Maiania, Silvia Campellod,e, Antonella Borrecaf, Annibale A. Pucag,h, Jonathan S. Stamleri,j, Francesco Cecconia,d,k, and Giuseppe Filomenia,d,3 aDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Center for Autophagy, Recycling and Disease, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; bDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, Institute for Research and Health Care San Raffaele (IRCCS) Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy; cInstitute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen, Bispebjerg Hospital, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark; dDepartment of Biology, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy; eIRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, 00146 Rome, Italy; fInstitute of Cellular Biology and Neuroscience, National Research Council, 00143 Rome, Italy; gCardiovascular Research Unit, IRCCS Multimedica, 20138 Milan, Italy; hDipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano Salerno, Italy; iInstitute for Transformative Molecular Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106; jHarrington Discovery Institute, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106; and kDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, IRCCS Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00146 Rome, Italy Edited by Solomon H. Snyder, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved March 1, 2018 (received for review January 9, 2018) S-nitrosylation, a prototypic redox-based posttranslational modifi- found in experimental models of aging, supporting the idea that cation, is frequently dysregulated in disease. S-nitrosoglutathione GSNOR preserves cellular function. reductase (GSNOR) regulates protein S-nitrosylation by function- The free radical theory of aging postulates that oxidative ing as a protein denitrosylase.
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Department of Environmental Management
    ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED RENEWAL OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE FACILITY PERMIT UNDER THE ALABAMA HAZARDOUS WASTES MANAGEMENT AND MINIMIZATION ACT (AHWMMA) AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS PUBLIC NOTICE – 421 CALHOUN COUNTY Anniston Army Depot of Anniston, Alabama submitted to ADEM an application for renewal of its Hazardous Waste Facility permit for the 3 ANMC Conventional Waste Munitions Storage Igloos, 3 ANAD Industrial Waste Storage Buildings ,1 Roll-off Storage Building, 1 Open Burning Unit, 1 Open Detonation Unit, 1 Static Detonation Chamber (SDC), 3 SDC Service Magazines, 34 SDC Conventional Waste Munitions Storage Igloos, 1 Thermal Treatment Closed Disposal Process (TTCDP), 1 Energetic Treatment Unit (Flash Furnace), and 3 Rocket Motor Fire Units which are used to manage hazardous waste at its facility (EPA I.D. Number AL3 210 020 027 located at 7 Frankford Avenue, Anniston, Alabama 36201. The Department has determined the facility’s renewal application to be complete and has prepared a draft permit in accordance with State regulations. Anniston Army Depot operates a facility that treats and stores hazardous waste. The United States Department of the Army, Anniston Army Depot (Facility Owner, Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Operator); the United States Department of the Army, Anniston Munitions Center (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co- Operator (ANMC operations)); the United States Department of the Army, Anniston Field Office (AFO) (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co-Operator (Static Detonation Chamber (SDC) Site); and Washington Demilitarization Company LLC (Facility Co-Permittee, Facility Co-Operator (SDC site)) are the operators of the hazardous waste storage and treatment facility. The proposed permit renewal incorporates updates to the previous permit to reflect changes made to Part I thought IX of the AHWMMA permit.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Threat Chemical Agents: Characteristics, Effects, and Policy Implications
    Order Code RL31861 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web High-Threat Chemical Agents: Characteristics, Effects, and Policy Implications Updated September 9, 2003 Dana A. Shea Analyst in Science and Technology Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress High-Threat Chemical Agents: Characteristics, Effects, and Policy Implications Summary Terrorist use of chemical agents has been a noted concern, highlighted after the Tokyo Sarin gas attacks of 1995. The events of September 11, 2001, increased Congressional attention towards reducing the vulnerability of the United States to such attacks. High-threat chemical agents, which include chemical weapons and some toxic industrial chemicals, are normally organized by military planners into four groups: nerve agents, blister agents, choking agents, and blood agents. While the relative military threat posed by the various chemical types has varied over time, use of these chemicals against civilian targets is viewed as a low probability, high consequence event. High-threat chemical agents, depending on the type of agent used, cause a variety of symptoms in their victims. Some cause death by interfering with the nervous system. Some inhibit breathing and lead to asphyxiation. Others have caustic effects on contact. As a result, chemical attack treatment may be complicated by the need to identify at least the type of chemical used. Differences in treatment protocols for the various high-threat agents may also strain the resources of the public health system, especially in the case of mass casualties. Additionally, chemical agents trapped on the body or clothes of victims may place first responders and medical professionals at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Trauma Clinical Guideline: Major Burn Resuscitation
    Washington State Department of Health Office of Community Health Systems Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Section Trauma Clinical Guideline Major Burn Resuscitation The Trauma Medical Directors and Program Managers Workgroup is an open forum for designated trauma services in Washington State to share ideas and concerns about providing trauma care. The workgroup meets regularly to encourage communication among services, and to share best practices and information to improve quality of care. On occasion, at the request of the Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Steering Committee, the group discusses the value of specific clinical management guidelines for trauma care. The Washington State Department of Health distributes this guideline on behalf of the Emergency Medical Services and Trauma Care Steering Committee to assist trauma care services with developing their trauma patient care guidelines. Toward this goal, the workgroup has categorized the type of guideline, the sponsoring organization, how it was developed, and whether it has been tested or validated. The intent of this information is to assist physicians in evaluating the content of this guideline and its potential benefits for their practice or any particular patient. The Department of Health does not mandate the use of this guideline. The department recognizes the varying resources of different services, and approaches that work for one trauma service may not be suitable for others. The decision to use this guideline depends on the independent medical judgment of the physician. We recommend trauma services and physicians who choose to use this guideline consult with the department regularly for any updates to its content. The department appreciates receiving any information regarding practitioners’ experience with this guideline.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Status Report on the Destruction of the United States Stockpile of Lethal Chemical Agents and Munitions for Fiscal Year 2019
    Annual Status Report on the Destruction of the United States Stockpile of Lethal Chemical Agents and Munitions for Fiscal Year 2019 September 30, 2019 The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $740 for the 2019 Fiscal Year. This includes $0 in expenses and $740 in DoD labor. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 II. Mission .................................................................................................................................1 III. Organization .........................................................................................................................1 IV. Current Status of U.S. Chemical Weapons Destruction ......................................................2 A. Site-by-Site Description of Chemical Weapons Stockpile Destruction……………….2 B. Assembled Chemical Weapons Alternatives Program……………………………..….3 V. Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program ......................................................5 VI. Funding Execution ...............................................................................................................7 VII. Safety Status of Chemical Weapons Stockpile Storage .......................................................8 APPENDICES A. Abbreviations and Symbols B. Program Disbursements C. Summary Occurrences of Leaking Chemical Munitions i I. Introduction The Department of Defense (DoD) is submitting
    [Show full text]