Sustainability Appraisal of the Site Specific Proposals Local Development Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Sustainability Appraisal of the Site Specific Proposals Local Development Document Scoping Report March 2009 ii Contents Page No 1. Introduction 1 2. Context within the Core Spatial Strategy 3 3. Baseline Information - Introduction 8 - The Borough in Context 10 - Housing 12 - Gypsy and Travellers 14 - Employment 14 - Retail 18 - Leisure and Tourism 19 - Community Facilities 19 - Education 20 - Transportation 21 - Waste 23 - Settlement Pattern 24 - Land & Soil 25 - Landscape 26 - Cultural Heritage 27 - Conservation 27 - Archaeology 28 - Open Space 28 - Biodiversity 29 - Water 32 - Air & Climate 33 - Social Deprivation 34 - Crime 34 - Health 36 4. The Sustainability Report 37 Appendix 1. Appraisal Questions 38 Appendix 2. Biodiversity data 43 i 1. Introduction Purpose of the Scoping Report 1.1 Under the Planning & Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 a Sustainability Appraisal is mandatory for Development Plan Documents, including Supplementary Planning Documents. Planning Authorities must also undertake an Environmental Assessment in accordance with European Directive 2001/42/EC. Sustainability Appraisals are intended to help Local Planning Authorities to achieve ‘sustainable development’ in its widest context and are undertaken as part of a systematic process during the formulation of Development Plan Documents. The requirements of the European Directive are incorporated into the Sustainability Appraisal. 1.2 This Scoping Report is the first stage of the Sustainability Appraisal process with regard to the Site Specific Proposals Local Development Document (LDD). The purpose of the Scoping Report is to set out the social, environmental and economic issues identified in so far as to: - Develop and agree an appraisal methodology and programme - Ensure stakeholder involvement in the appraisal process - Identify and review relevant policies, plans, and programmes and sustainable development objectives that will affect or influence the plan - Present a characterisation of the plan area based upon the relevant social, environmental and economic baseline information - Provide an environmental report to cover the requirements of the SEA directive - Identify key sustainability issues for the Sustainability Appraisal to address - Agree a Sustainability Appraisal Framework, consisting of the sustainability objectives and indicators - Test the plan objectives against the Sustainability Appraisal Framework - And to set out the broad options which are considered in more detail in developing the LDD. 1.3 As the requirements of the Sustainability Appraisal and Strategic Environmental Assessment incorporate similar processes with the Sustainability Appraisal focusing on environmental, social and economic matters, the scoping report along with the subsequent sustainability reports address the requirements of both together. 1.4 This report is divided into four sections: - 1. The introduction – explaining the purpose of the report in relation to the plan process and pre commencement background work. 2. Context within the Core Spatial Strategy – including the outline of Sustainability Objectives, Sustainability Framework and Plan objectives 3. The identification of baseline information – which also informs the identification of key sustainability issues. 4. Structure of Final Sustainability Appraisal Report – identifying the level of detail considered appropriate to the further stages. 2 2. Context within Core Spatial Strategy 2.1 The North Northamptonshire Joint Planning Unit has been set up to provide a strategic planning context for the administrative areas of East Northamptonshire, Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough with the production of the Core Spatial Strategy for North Northamptonshire. The Sustainability Appraisal Scoping Report for the Core Spatial Strategy for North Northamptonshire was published in April 2005 and also covers the districts of East Northamptonshire, Corby, Kettering and Wellingborough. It provides the context for the Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Development Documents within the area. 2.2 Government advice provides for local authorities to prepare a single scoping report and in this instance it is considered that in assisting with the provision of context for sustainable development, the scoping report of the Core Spatial Strategy is acceptable for use for the Site Specific Proposals LDD. However it is considered that it would be beneficial if the scoping report were supplemented to address specific local baseline information and issues in the locality as this would better inform the sustainability process. 2.3 In this respect the Scoping report to the Core Spatial Strategy should be read in conjunction with this report. The Scoping report to the Core Spatial Strategy is available on the Joint Planning Unit web site www.nnjpu.org.uk or from the Joint Planning Unit on 01536 274974. The Sustainability Framework to the Core Spatial Strategy for North Northamptonshire was formulated following extensive stakeholder consultation. The sustainability objectives remain the same for the Site Specific Proposals LDD. It is considered that this process meets the requirements of the Sustainability Guidance and SEA Directive. 2.4 The Sustainability Framework is essential to the process and is proposed to be used for appraising the Plan. The Framework consists of objectives measurable by indicators, which will help assess the overall sustainability of the plan policies and allow recommendations and mitigation measures to be proposed as well as provide a basis for future monitoring and appraisal of the plan. 2.5 The Core Spatial Strategy for North Northamptonshire identified a limited number of sustainability objectives to ensure a manageable level for the assessment stage and the Sustainability Appraisal continued with this approach. These objectives are considered to be relevant to the plan and will form the basis for the Site Specific Proposals LDD. For clarity they are indicated in Table 1. 3 Table 1: Sustainability Objectives SA TOPIC SA OBJECTIVE Social progress which recognises the needs of everyone Accessibility Enable people all to have similar and sufficient levels of access to services, facilities and opportunities Housing Provide the opportunity for people to meet their housing needs Health Improve overall levels of physical, mental health and social well being and reduce disparities between different groups and different areas Crime Reduce the incidences of crime and the fear of crime Community Value and nurture a sense of belonging in a cohesive community whilst respecting diversity Skills Assist people in gaining the skills to fulfil their potential and increase their contribution to society and the economy Liveability To create healthy, clean and pleasant environments for people to enjoy living, working and for recreation and to protect and enhance residential amenity Effective protection of the environment Biodiversity To protect, maintain and enhance the diversity and abundance of species and their habitats, to implement a net gain and to avoid habitat fragmentation Landscape Maintain and enhance the quality, character and local distinctiveness of the landscape, including its contribution to the setting and character of settlements Cultural Heritage Protect and enhance sites, features and areas of historical, archaeological, geological and cultural value and their settings Built Environment Maintain and enhance the quality and distinctiveness of the built environment Climate Change Reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases and protect people from the effects of climate change Prudent Use of natural resources Air Reduce all forms of air pollution in the interests of local air quality and the integrity of the atmosphere Water Quality Maintain and improve the quality of ground and river waters Water Conservation Ensure adequate water supply, maximise water and Management efficiency and reduce the risk of flooding Soil and Land Ensure the efficient use of land and maintain the resource of productive soil Minerals Ensure the efficient use of minerals and primary resources 4 Energy Use Minimise energy consumption, increase energy efficiency and maintain the stock of non renewable energy sources Renewable Energy Increase the opportunities for energy generation from renewable energy sources Waste Reduce the consumption of finite materials and increase reuse and recycling Maintenance of high and stable levels of economic growth and employment Employment Maintain and enhance employment opportunities and to reduce the disparities arising from unequal access to jobs Wealth Creation Retain and enhance the factors which are conducive to wealth creation, including personal creativity, infrastructure and the local strengths and qualities that are attractive to visitors and investors Town Centres Protect and enhance the vitality and viability of town centres and market towns 2.6 In order to understand the relationship between the plan objectives and the sustainability objectives, they need to be compared. The plan objectives for the Site Specific Proposals LDD are provided in Table 2 and the comparison matrix in Table 3 below. Table 2: Site Specific Proposals LDD Objectives The objectives for the Site Specific Proposals LDD are to: 1 Provide appropriate housing to meet the needs of all sections of the community 2 Enhance the economy of the Borough ensuring residents have access to a wide range of employment opportunities and life long learning 3 Increase accessibility to community, leisure and retail facilities for all members
Recommended publications
  • T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45

    T1)E Bedford,1)Ire Naturaii,T 45

    T1)e Bedford,1)ire NaturaIi,t 45 Journal for the year 1990 Bedfordshire Natural History Society 1991 'ISSN 0951 8959 I BEDFORDSHffiE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY 1991 Chairman: Mr D. Anderson, 88 Eastmoor Park, Harpenden, Herts ALS 1BP Honorary Secretary: Mr M.C. Williams, 2 Ive! Close, Barton-le-Clay, Bedford MK4S 4NT Honorary Treasurer: MrJ.D. Burchmore, 91 Sundon Road, Harlington, Dunstable, Beds LUS 6LW Honorary Editor (Bedfordshire Naturalist): Mr C.R. Boon, 7 Duck End Lane, Maulden, Bedford MK4S 2DL Honorary Membership Secretary: Mrs M.]. Sheridan, 28 Chestnut Hill, Linslade, Leighton Buzzard, Beds LU7 7TR Honorary Scientific Committee Secretary: Miss R.A. Brind, 46 Mallard Hill, Bedford MK41 7QS Council (in addition to the above): Dr A. Aldhous MrS. Cham DrP. Hyman DrD. Allen MsJ. Childs Dr P. Madgett MrC. Baker Mr W. Drayton MrP. Soper Honorary Editor (Muntjac): Ms C. Aldridge, 9 Cowper Court, Markyate, Herts AL3 8HR Committees appointed by Council: Finance: Mr]. Burchmore (Sec.), MrD. Anderson, Miss R. Brind, Mrs M. Sheridan, Mr P. Wilkinson, Mr M. Williams. Scientific: Miss R. Brind (Sec.), Mr C. Boon, Dr G. Bellamy, Mr S. Cham, Miss A. Day, DrP. Hyman, MrJ. Knowles, MrD. Kramer, DrB. Nau, MrE. Newman, Mr A. Outen, MrP. Trodd. Development: Mrs A. Adams (Sec.), MrJ. Adams (Chairman), Ms C. Aldridge (Deputy Chairman), Mrs B. Chandler, Mr M. Chandler, Ms]. Childs, Mr A. Dickens, MrsJ. Dickens, Mr P. Soper. Programme: MrJ. Adams, Mr C. Baker, MrD. Green, MrD. Rands, Mrs M. Sheridan. Trustees (appointed under Rule 13): Mr M. Chandler, Mr D. Green, Mrs B.
  • Assessment Appendices Biodiversity Character

    Assessment Appendices Biodiversity Character

    BIODIVERSITY CHARACTER ASSESSMENT APPENDICES CONTENTS APPENDIX 1 Datasets used in the Northamptonshire Biodiversity Character Assessment ................................................................. 03 APPENDIX 2 Natural Areas in Northamptonshire .............................................................................................................................................. 04 Natural Area 44. Midlands Clay Pastures ....................................................................................................................................... 04 Natural Area 45. Rockingham Forest .............................................................................................................................................. 09 Natural Area 52. West Anglian Plain ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Natural Area 54. Yardley-Whittlewood Ridge .............................................................................................................................. 20 Natural Area 55. Cotswolds ................................................................................................................................................................ 25 APPENDIX 3 Site of Special Scientifi c Interest Summaries .............................................................................................................................. 26 APPENDIX 4 Wildlife Site Summaries ....................................................................................................................................................................
  • Sustainability Appraisal

    Sustainability Appraisal

    Sustainability Appraisal Local Development Framework Development Plan Documents Rothwell and Desborough Urban Extension Area Action Plan – Proposed Submission November 2009 CONTENTS Content Page Executive Summary 2 1. Introduction 5 2. Appraisal Methodology 7 3. Sustainability Appraisal of the Plan Objectives and Policies 17 4. Mitigation 31 5. Monitoring 32 Appendices Appendix 1 Summary of Sustainability Appraisal into County Structure 33 Plan Appendix 2 Sustainability Appraisal of Plan Objectives and Core Spatial 36 Strategy Objectives Appendix 3 Consultation on Scoping Report 41 Appendix 4 Sustainability Framework 43 Appendix 5 Other Plans and Programmes 53 Appendix 6 Baseline Information 77 Appendix 7 Sustainability Appraisal of the Plan Objectives & Policies – 104 Data Matrices Appendix 8 Documentation of Effects of Policies 165 Appendix 9 Magnitude of Effects of Policies 179 Appendix 10 Monitoring Indicators 180 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SUMMARY AND OUTCOMES The plan being produced, the Rothwell and Desborough Urban Extension Area Action Plan, relates to the provision of two greenfield Sustainable Urban Extensions (SUEs) of 700 dwellings each plus associated infrastructure. Also, at Rothwell 4 hectares of employment land is proposed as part of the extension. The context for the Plan is found in saved policy within the County Structure Plan Adopted in 2001 and the North Northamptonshire Core Spatial Strategy. The Proposed Submission Document for Rothwell and Desborough has evolved from work undertaken prior to the commencement of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 and developed from the issues and options formulated around that time, the Preferred Options stage (October, 2006), and the updated Position Statement stage in February 2009. The County Structure Plan and Core Spatial Strategy were subject to a Sustainability Appraisal.
  • Environmental Statement Volume 1: Report May 2012

    Environmental Statement Volume 1: Report May 2012

    RENEWABLE ENERGY Environmental Statement Volume 1: Report May 2012 MAGNETIC PARK ENERGY CENTRE Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2012) save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report. We do not however exclude our liability (if any) for personal injury or death resulting from our negligence, for fraud or any other matter in relation to which we cannot legally exclude liability.
  • Area a Assessments

    Area a Assessments

    Central Bedfordshire Council www.centralbedfordshire.gov.uk Appendix A: Area A Assessments Central Bedfordshire Council Local Plan Initial Settlements Capacity Study CENTRAL BEDFORDSHIRE COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN: INITIAL SETTLEMENTS CAPACITY STUDY Appendix IIA- Area A-Initial Settlement Capacity Assessment Contents Table AMPTHILL ................................................................................................................... 1 ASPLEY GUISE ............................................................................................................ 7 ASPLEY HEATH ......................................................................................................... 13 BARTON-LE-CLAY.................................................................................................... 18 BILLINGTON ............................................................................................................. 23 CADDINGTON ......................................................................................................... 27 DUNSTABLE .............................................................................................................. 32 EATON BRAY ........................................................................................................... 38 EGGINGTON ........................................................................................................... 43 EVERSHOLT (CHURCHEND) ..................................................................................... 48 FLITWICK .................................................................................................................
  • KBC Note on Historically and Visually Important Local Green Space December 2020

    KBC Note on Historically and Visually Important Local Green Space December 2020

    KBC Note on Historically and Visually Important Local Green Space December 2020 1. Introduction 1.1. Paragraph 99 of the NPPF enables the designation of land as Local Green Space through local and neighbourhood plans to allow communities to identify and protect green areas of particular importance to them. It states that the designation of land as Local Green Space should be consistent with the local planning of sustainable development and complement investment in sufficient homes jobs and essential services. Paragraph 100 of the NPPF sets out criteria which should be applied when designating Local Green Space, the designation should only be met when the green space is: a) In reasonably close proximity to the community it serves; b) Demonstrably special to the local community and holds a particular local significance, for example because of its beauty, historic significance, recreational value (including as a playing field), tranquillity or richness of its wildlife; and c) Local in character and not an extensive tract of land. 1.2. The NPPG provides further guidance on the approach to designating Local Green Space in paragraphs 005 Reference ID: 37-005-20140306 to Paragraph: 022 Reference ID: 37-022-20140306. 1.3. EXAM17 raised a number of points in relation to Policy NEH3 Historically and Visually Important Local Green Spaces. In summary these are: • Information is needed on the approach to the identification of sites and whether these were put forward or promoted by the local community. • Individual assessment sheets from the 2012 background paper have not been provided. • The absence of information on who promoted sites, the community’s reasons for seeking the designation and an explanation of why the space is considered to be demonstrably special means there are concerns over the soundness of the policy.
  • Annual Report 2019-2020

    Annual Report 2019-2020

    Annual Report 2019 - 2020 The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire and Northamptonshire Company Registration No 2534145 (England and Wales) www.wildlifebcn.org Registered Charity No. 1000412 Contents Corn bunting, Great Fen Chair’s Introduction .....................................................................................2 Annual Review - our strategic report ................................................3 Finance Review ..............................................................................................22 STRATEGIC REPORT Structure, Governance and Management ......................................25 Charity Information ......................................................................................28 Statutory Information .................................................................................29 “The Trust aims to protect and restore the Our Thanks ........................................................................................................31 Our Vision natural environment in our three counties and Independent Auditors Report ...............................................................32 enable people to learn about it and enjoy it.” Consolidated Statement of financial activity ...............................35 People close to nature, in a land rich in wildlife Consolidated Balance Sheets ................................................................36 Sir Graham Fry, Chair of the Council Wildlife Trust Trust BCN Wildlife Charity Balance Sheets ..............................................................................38
  • The Plens Lflt

    Pipeline works We hope you enjoy your visit New housing to the North of Desborough has required that a pipeline be buried through the centre of the nature reserve. This may appear to be highly destructive in the short term, however in the long term such ‘disturbances’ can often be More Information WWelcomeelcome to to beneficial. The Plens was created Your local Wildlife Trust protects wildlife and Welcome to through a similar process that countryside for people to enjoy in Bedfordshire, brings rocks and poor soils to the Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire and TheBarford Plens Meadow surface providing new areas for Peterborough. We are a charity dependent on plants and insects to colonise. voluntary contributions. NatureNature Reserve Reserve If you would like more information about this reserve Nature Reserve The wildflowers and animals that or other reserves in Northamptonshire, please make this site important are highly contact: dependent on these conditions. With growing numbers of Reserves Manager visitors to the site, it is The Wildlife Trust increasingly important to be Lings House, sensitive to nature, for Billing Lings, Northampton example simply by NN3 8BE cleaning up after dogs Tel: 01604 405285 and general E-mail: [email protected] recreational activities. Common spotted orchid Access This site is supported by: Access to the reserve is by foot through the Country park to the East of the reserve or alternatively, via the Desborough to Stoke Albany footpath, which Through the Landfill Tax Credit Scheme runs North- west through the reserve. Some places are steep and slippery, and can be muddy in wet Market Harborough Round Table No.
  • Download PPG17 Open Space Needs Assessment

    Download PPG17 Open Space Needs Assessment

    KETTERING BOROUGH COUNCIL OPEN NEEDS ASSESSMENT A REPORT BY PMP DECEMBER 2007 CONTENTS Page Section 1 Introduction and background 1 Section 2 Undertaking the study 6 Section 3 Strategic context 14 Section 4 Consultation 44 Section 5 Parks and gardens 61 Section 6 Natural and semi natural open space 75 Section 7 Amenity greenspace 88 Section 8 Provision for children and young people 103 Section 9 Outdoor sports facilities 123 Section 10 Allotments and community gardens 136 Section 11 Green corridors 148 Section 12 Cemeteries and churchyards 155 Section 13 Civic spaces 161 Section 14 Resourcing and open space 166 Section 15 Planning overview 169 Section 16 Example of provision calculations 186 Section 17 Conclusion 197 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background i. PMP were appointed to undertake an audit and assessment of open space across the Kettering Borough in accordance with the requirements of the latest Planning Policy Guidance Note 17 (Planning for Open Space Sport and Recreation, July 2002) and its Companion Guide (September 2002). ii. The Companion Guide sets out a five step logical process for undertaking a local assessment of open space. Although presented as a linear process below, in reality, many stages were undertaken in parallel. iii. The five step process is as follows: • Step 1 - Identifying Local Needs • Step 2 - Auditing Local Provision • Step 3 - Setting Provision Standards • Step 4 - Applying Provision Standards • Step 5 - Drafting Policies - recommendations and strategic priorities. iv. The study considers ten typologies of open space facilities, namely: • parks and gardens • natural and semi natural open space • amenity greenspace • provision for children • provision for young people • outdoor sports facilities • allotments and community gardens • green corridors • churchyards and cemeteries.
  • Nene Valley Strategic Plan

    Nene Valley Strategic Plan

    RIVER NENE REGIONAL PARK - NENE VALLEY STRATEGIC PLAN Realising the potential of the Nene Valley Final Report October 2010 Commissioned by the River Nene Regional Park, ALSF Natural England, Bee Bee Developments Ltd, Environment Agency, Natural England and North Northamptonshire Development Company 2 CONTENTS Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................ 6 2. Strategic Context .................................................................................................................................................................... 9 3. Nene Valley Today ................................................................................................................................................................ 15 PART 2: THE NENE VALLEY STRATEGIC PLAN 4. Vision, Objectives and Themes .......................................................................................................................................... 24 5. A More Enjoyed River Nene ................................................................................................................................................ 28 6. Reinvigorated Nene Towns ...............................................................................................................................................
  • Chapter Three: Development Principles

    Chapter Three: Development Principles

    Chapter Three: Development Principles 75 Strategic Planning for the Districts and Boroughs of Corby, Kettering, Wellingborough & East Northamptonshire 25. Introduction It also suggests where there are barriers how these can be improved and enhanced to become more of a feature to the town 25.1 Development Principles 25.1.1 This chapter uses the constraints and opportunities information with new development, such as the rivers and open spaces. For contained within Chapter Two and other qualitative factors from instance, a Grade E (poor) score would highlight a sector where a range of existing evidence base documents, including the there are no possible connections to a local connected network, Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) and Urban the only connecting point would be via a vehicle only route and the adjacent town structure is cut off by dead ends and loops, Extensions Studies. These are encapsulated in summary diagrams to assess the potential sectors where development could be none of which front onto the single connecting route. There located around the towns. would be no clear grid network, no GI routes and significant barriers between site and amenities, which cannot be overcome 25.1.2 Once these broad sectors are established, they are broken down without significant difficulty such as large areas of built form, into smaller sub areas based on the adjacent town structure. Highways Agency level roads, and flood plains. These sub areas are then assessed for their potential level of integration to the existing town. The assessment is based on the 25.2.3 The assessments indicate the key issues that any site coming route structure analysis, informed by the axial lines analysis forward in the sector would need to resolve to improve its alongside Green Infrastructure (GI) routes, and examination of any connectivity.