Transmucosal Drug Delivery- an Overview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transmucosal Drug Delivery- an Overview Send Orders for Reprints to [email protected] 26 Drug Delivery Letters, 2014, 4, 26-37 Transmucosal Drug Delivery- An Overview Pooja Abhang*, Munira Momin, Mayur Inamdar and Swapan Kar Oriental College of Pharmacy, Secctor-2, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai-400705, Maharastra, India Abstract: During the past 20 years, advances in drug formulations and innovative routes of administration have been made. The understanding of drug transport across tissues has increased. The administration of drug by transmucosal routes offers the advantage of being a relatively painless administration and has the potential for greater flexibility in a variety of clinical situations. The transmucosal route includes oral, nasal, vaginal, and urethral and presents a challenge in the field of novel drug delivery technology. The oral transmucosal delivery, especially the buccal and sublingual routes have been explored successfully for a number of drugs in the last few decades with novel approaches emerging continuously. The transmucosal membranes are relatively permeable, have a rich blood flow and hence allow the rapid uptake of a drug into systemic circulation to avoid first pass metabolism. This route of drug delivery offers a number of benefits over other drug delivery approaches and allows drugs to circumvent some of the body’s natural defense mechanisms like first pass me- tabolism, harsh stomach environment etc. Several approaches have been used like drug delivery through the nasal route by using sprays, pumps and gels while the mucoadhesive, quick dissolve tablets and solid lozenge formulations are for the oral mucosal route. Also, vaginal or urethral routes can be explored using mucoadhesive suppositories, in-situ gel and foam etc. The purpose of this review is to compile the basic approach studies by different research groups in the last few years. Keywords: Bioadhesive polymer, drug delivery, mucoadhesion, transmucosal. INTRODUCTION NEED OF TRANSMUCOSAL DRUG DELIVERY Transmucosal delivery of therapeutic agents is a popular There is a need for transmucosal drug delivery for Con- method because mucous membranes are relatively perme- trolled release, for targeted and localized drug delivery, for able, allowing for rapid uptake of a drug into the systemic bypass first pass metabolism, for avoidance of drug degrada- circulation and avoiding the first pass metabolism. This effi- tion, for prolonged effect, for high drug flux through the ab- cient uptake offers several benefits over other methods of sorbing tissue, and for reduction in fluctuation of steady state delivery and allows drugs to circumvent some of the body’s plasma level. natural defense mechanisms. Transmucosal products can be designed to be administered via the nasal route by using An ideal dosage form is one which attains the desired sprays, pumps and gels, via the oral/buccal route using mu- therapeutic concentration of drug in plasma and maintains a coadhesive, quick dissolve tablets and solid lozenge formula- constant for the entire duration of treatment. This is possi- tions and via vaginal or urethral routes using suppositories ble through administration of a conventional dosage form [1]. in a particular dose and at a particular frequency. In most cases, the dosing intervals are much shorter than the half In the development of these drug delivery systems, mu- life of the drug resulting in a number of limitations associ- coadhesion of the device is a key element. The term ‘muco- ated with such a conventional dosage form which is as adhesive’ is commonly used for materials that bind to the follows: mucin layer of a biological membrane. Mucoadhesive poly- mers have been utilized in many different dosage forms in Poor patient compliance; increased chances of missing efforts to achieve systemic delivery of drugs through the the dose of a drug with a short half-life for which frequent different mucosae. These dosage forms include tablets, administration is necessary; a typical peak plasma concentra- patches, tapes, films, semisolids and powders. To serve as tion time profile which makes attainment of a steady state mucoadhesive polymers, the polymers should possess some condition difficult; unavoidable fluctuation in the drug con- general physiochemical features such as predominantly ani- centration that may lead to under medication or over medica- onic hydrophilicity with numerous hydrogen bond-forming tion as the steady state concentration values fall or rise be- groups, suitable surface property for wetting mucus/mucosal yond the therapeutic range; fluctuating drug levels that may tissue surfaces and sufficient flexibility to penetrate the mu- lead to precipitation of adverse effects especially of a drug cus network or tissue crevices [2, 3]. with a small therapeutic index whenever overmedication occurs [4]. *Address correspondence to this author at the Oriental College of Phar- macy, Secctor-2, Sanpada, Navi Mumbai-400705, Maharastra, India; Tel: +91-8108146662; E-mail: [email protected] 2210-304X/14 $58.00+.00 © 2014 Bentham Science Publishers Transmucosal Drug Delivery- An Overview Drug Delivery Letters, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 1 27 ADVANTAGES OF TRANSMUCOSAL DRUG DE- safety margin of high potency drugs due to better con- LIVERY trol of plasma levels, maximum utilization of the drug enabling a reduction in the total amount of drug admin- Advantages of Transmucosal Drug Delivery are Stated as istered, improved patient convenience and compliance Follows: due to less frequent drug administration, reduction in • A prolonged residence time at the site of drug action or fluctuation of steady state levels and therefore better absorption. control of disease conditions and a reduced intensity of local or systemic side effects. • Localization of drug action of the delivery system at a given target site Despite the several advantages associated with oral con- trolled drug delivery systems, there are many limitations [5]. • Ease of administration • Convenient termination of therapy (except through gas- LIMITATIONS OF TRANSMUCOSAL DRUG DELIV- trointestinal route), ERY • Permits localization of the drug to the oral cavity for a Drugs, which irritate the oral mucosa, have a bitter or prolonged period of time unpleasant taste and odour and cannot be administered by • Can be administered to unconscious patients, except this route. Drugs which are unstable at buccal pH cannot be gastrointestinal administered by this route. Only drugs with small dose re- quirements can be administered. Drugs may be swallowed • Offers an excellent route for the systemic delivery of with saliva and lose the advantages of the buccal route. Only drugs with high first pass metabolism, thereby offering a those drugs which are absorbed by passive diffusion can be greater bioavailability, administered by this route. Eating and drinking may become • Facilitation in achieving a significant reduction in dose restricted, however swallowing of the formulation by the thereby reducing dose related side effects, patient may be possible. Over hydration may lead to the for- mation of a slippery surface and the structural integrity of the • Causing drugs which are unstable in the acidic environ- formulation may get disrupted by the swelling and hydration ment to be destroyed by the enzymatic or alkaline envi- of the bioadhesive polymers [6]. ronment of the intestine to be administered by this route. Eg. Buccal, sublingual and vaginal. Drugs which show MECHANISM OF MUCOADHESION poor bioavailability via the oral route can be adminis- tered conveniently The concept of mucoadhesion is one that has the poten- tial to improve the highly variable residence times experi- • Offers a passive system of drug absorption and does not enced by drugs and dosage forms at various sites in the gas- require any activation, trointestinal tract, and consequently, to reduce variability and • The presence of saliva ensures a relatively large amount improve efficacy. Intimate contact with the mucosa should of water for drug dissolution unlike in the case of rectal enhance absorption. The mechanisms responsible in the for- and transdermal routes mation of bioadhesive bonds are not fully known, however most research has described bioadhesive bond formation as a Rapid systemic absorption • three step process: [7, 8]. Provides an alternative for the administration of various • Step 1: Wetting and swelling of the polymer. hormones, narcotic analgesic, steroids, enzymes, cardio- vascular agents, etc Step 2: Interpenetration between the polymer chains and the mucosal membrane. • The buccal mucosa is highly perfused with blood vessels and offers a greater permeability than the skin, with less Step 3: Formation of Chemical bonds between the entangled dosing frequency, shorter treatment period, increased chains. Fig. (1). Wetting and swelling of polymer. 28 Drug Delivery Letters, 2014, Vol. 4, No. 1 Abhang et al. Step 1 The wetting and swelling step occurs when the polymer spreads over the surface of the biological substrate or mu- cosal membrane in order to develop an intimate contact with the substrate. This can be readily achieved for example by placing a bioadhesive formulation such as a tablet or paste within the oral cavity or vagina. Bioadhesives are able to adhere to or bond with biological tissues by the help of the Fig. (3). Entanglement of Polymer and Mucus by Chemical bonds. surface tension and forces that exist at the site of adsorption or contact. Swelling of polymers occurs because the compo- TRANSMUCOSAL ROUTES OF DRUG DELIVERY nents within
Recommended publications
  • Routes of Drug Administration
    Routes of Drug Administration Edited by A. T. Florence PhD, DSc, FRSC, FRSE, FRPharmS The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, UK and E. G. Salole BSc, PhD, MRPharmS Department of Pharmacy, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK WRIGHT London Boston Singapore Sydney Toronto Wellington Wright is an imprint of Butterworth Scientific @l PART OF REED INTERNATIONAL RL.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any material form (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by electronic means and whether or not transiently or incidentally to some other use of this publication) without the written permission of the copyright owner except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 33-34 Alfred Place, London, England WCIE 7DP. Applications for the copyright owner's written permission to reproduce any part of this publication should be addressed to the Publishers. Warning: The doing of an unauthorised act in relation to a copyrigbht work may result in both a civil claim for damages and criminal prosecution. This book is sold subject to the Standard Conditions of Sale of Net Books and may not be re-sold in the UK below the net price given by the Publishers in their current price list. First published 1990 © Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd, 1990 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Routes of drug administration. 1. Medicine. Drug therapy I. Florence, A. T. (Alexander Taylor) II. Salole, E.G. (Eugene G) III.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Rights of Children with Epilepsy in School and Child Care – an Advocate’S Manual
    Legal Rights of Children with Epilepsy in School & Child Care AN ADVOCATE’S MANUAL AN ADVOCATE’S AN ADVOCATE’S MANUAL AN ADVOCATE’S First Edition Legal Rights of Children with Epilepsy in School and Child Care – An Advocate’s Manual First Edition Prepared by Leslie Seid Margolis Managing Attorney Maryland Disability Law Center Edited by Gary Gross Director Jeanne A. Carpenter Epilepsy Legal Defense Fund Epilepsy Foundation of America® User is hereby granted permission to copy or disseminate this publication, either in print or electronic format, provided such copies are not made, distributed or used for commercial purposes, and that the user affixes the Epilepsy Foundation’s copyright notice, and states that copying is by permission of the Epilepsy Foundation. To disseminate otherwise, or to republish, requires written permission from the Epilepsy Foundation. Permission can be obtained by contacting the Foundation’s Legal Department at 301-459-3700. The Epilepsy Foundation does not evaluate, promote or endorse commercial products, and nothing contained in this document is intended to be an endorsement of any particular treatment for seizures or epilepsy. © 2008 Epilepsy Foundation of America, Inc. Epilepsy Foundation® and Epilepsy Foundation of America® are registered trademarks of the Epilepsy Foundation of America, Inc. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS …………………………………………….xiii ABOUT THE AUTHOR ...........................................................................xiv INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………1 CHAPTER ONE What Do Attorneys
    [Show full text]
  • Rectal Administration of Aid-In-Dying Medications
    Rectal Administration of Aid-in-Dying Medications (NOTE: This is a medical procedure and requires a trained clinician who can evaluate the patient for this procedure, do a rectal exam to be sure that the procedure can be safely accomplished, and be responsible for potential complications. We do not recommend that this be done by families alone without significant direct clinician participation.) by Thalia DeWolf, RN, CHPN For questions and/or information, email [email protected] An Essential Warning: Aid-in-dying medications are a thick suspension of powders. They can clog a Macy Catheter. So while Macy Catheters are indeed wonderful and useful devices for end-of- life care, they should not be used for medical aid in dying. See below for proper materials. Pre-care: An intact, empty, warm, moist, well-perfused rectum assures thorough absorption of rectally administered aid-in-dying medications. Be sure your patient has good bowel care in the 72 hours before aid in dying. A daily soft BM is recommended. The best practice is to do an enema the day before or the morning of aid in dying. Within 24 hours of the procedure (or at the time of the procedure) a digital rectal exam must be performed by an experienced clinician (RN or physician) The clinician must ascertain that the lumen is patent and will accept the catheter; that the rectal vault is not filled with stool (small amounts of stool will not interfere with absorption of medications, large amounts, especially of thick, pasty stool, are likely to bind the medications and prevent absorption; that tumor has not invaded the rectum; that the rectum is warm and well-perfused).
    [Show full text]
  • Orally Inhaled & Nasal Drug Products
    ORALLY INHALED & NASAL DRUG PRODUCTS: INNOVATIONS FROM MAJOR DELIVERY SYSTEM DEVELOPERS www.ondrugdelivery.com 00349_GF_OnDrugDelivery349_GF_OnDrugDelivery PulmonaryPulmonary NasalNasal NovemberNovember 2010.indd2010.indd 1 330/11/100/11/10 111:32:331:32:33 “Orally Inhaled & Nasal Drug Products: Innovations from Major Delivery CONTENTS System Developers” This edition is one in the ONdrugDelivery series of pub- Innovation in Drug Delivery by Inhalation lications from Frederick Furness Publishing. Each issue focuses on a specific topic within the field of drug deliv- Andrea Leone-Bay, Vice-President, Pharmaceutical ery, and is supported by industry leaders in that field. Development, Dr Robert Baughman, Vice-President, Clinical Pharmacology & Bioanalytics, Mr Chad EDITORIAL CALENDAR 2011: Smutney, Senior Director, Device Technology, February: Prefilled Syringes Mr Joseph Kocinsky, Senior Vice-President, March: Oral Drug Delivery & Advanced Excipients Pharmaceutical Technology Development April: Pulmonary & Nasal Drug Delivery (OINDP) MannKind Corporation 4-7 May: Injectable Drug Delivery (Devices Focus) June: Injectable Drug Delivery (Formulations Focus) Current Innovations in Dry Powder Inhalers September: Prefilled Syringes Richard Sitz, Technical Manager, DPI Technology October: Oral Drug Delivery Platform Leader November: Pulmonary & Nasal Drug Delivery (OINDP) 3M Drug Delivery Systems 10-12 December: Delivering Biologics (Proteins, Peptides & Nucleotides) Pulmonary Delivery & Dry-Powder Inhalers: SUBSCRIPTIONS: Advances in Hard-Capsule
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Controlling Drug Delivery
    chapter 1 Controlling drug delivery Overview In this chapter we will: & differentiate drug delivery systems according to their physical state & differentiate drug delivery systems according to their route of administration & differentiate drug delivery systems according to their type of drug release & discuss drug transport across epithelial barriers. Introduction KeyPoints & Continued developments in Pharmacotherapy can be defined as the treatment chemistry, molecular biology and prevention of illness and disease by means of and genomics support the drugs of chemical or biological origin. It ranks discovery and developments among the most important methods of medical of new drugs and new drug treatment, together with surgery, physical targets. & treatment, radiation and psychotherapy. There The drug delivery system are many success stories concerning the use of employed can control the pharmacological action of a drugs and vaccines in the treatment, prevention drug, influencing its and in some cases even eradication of diseases pharmacokinetic and (e.g. smallpox, which is currently the only subsequent therapeutic human infectious disease completely profile. eradicated). Although it is almost impossible to estimate the exact extent of the impact of pharmacotherapy on human health, there can be no doubt that pharmacotherapy, together with improved sanitation, better diet and better housing, has improved people’s health, life expectancy and quality of life. Tip Unprecedented developments in genomics Combinatorial chemistry is a way to and molecular biology today offer a plethora of build a variety of structurally related new drug targets. The use of modern chemical drug compounds rapidly and synthetic methods (such as combinatorial systematically. These are assembled chemistry) enables the syntheses of a large from a range of molecular entities number of new drug candidates in shorter times which are put together in different ‘ ’ than ever before.
    [Show full text]
  • Domoso® Solution
    NADA 32-168, Approved by FDA DMSO instilled into the urinary bladder of intact, anesthetized dogs through which an these parameters. DMSO fails to show analgesic or anti-inflammatory activity in certain of In a study designed to evaluate the effects of DOMOSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) Solution at a total enhancement of absorption was demonstrated25. Utilizing a similar technique the transport of these situations, particularly when used by the systemic route or when administered topically daily dose of 100-300 mL administered for a total period of 90 days, no essential or clinically physiologically active insulin across the intact bladder mucosa was demonstrated. Results preceded by an irritant substance. In clinical studies in the horse, it was noted that when meaningful ophthalmological effects were seen in the horse. were judged on a decrease in blood sugar levels over that of controls26. iodine, liniments or other strong irritants were present on the skin from previous therapy and There were no significant variations in glucose, sodium, potassium, SGOT or SGPT DMSO applied, a temporary but marked local reaction would occur. This was due to the In vivo and in vitro methods demonstrated that DMSO enhanced human percutaneous measurements. There were a few fluctuations in hematologic values but no changes appear ability of DMSO to carry these substances into the underlying skin tissues where their irritant ® absorption of various compounds including steroids, vasoconstrictors, antiperspirants and to be drug-related or of significance. DOMOSO SOLUTION actions could be displayed. When DMSO was used clinically, it was applied topically to the dyes, as well as an anthelmintic (thiabendazole) and a skin antiseptic (hexachlorophene)27,28,29,60,61,62.
    [Show full text]
  • Mucosal Delivery Systems of Antihypertensive Drugs: a Practical Approach in General Practice Lukasz P
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2018 Jun; 162(2):71-78. Mucosal delivery systems of antihypertensive drugs: A practical approach in general practice Lukasz P. Bialya,b, Cezary Wojcikc, Izabela Mlynarczuk-Bialya,b Patients who are unable to receive oral medication (p.o.) are a major problem in outpatient settings, especially in home health care systems. Mucosal administration of drugs offers an alternative to the oral route, especially when the parenteral mode cannot be used. There are three main pathways of mucosal administration: sublingual/buccal, intranasal and rectal. We discuss the possibility of mucosal delivery of antihypertensive drugs. Perindopril arginine and Amlodipine besylate are registered in the EU as orodispersible tablets for oromucosal delivery, however, they are not available in all countries. For this reason, we describe other drugs suitable for mucosal delivery: Captopril and Nitrendipine in the sublingual system and Metoprolol tartrate, Propranolol and Furosemide by the transrectal route. Based on the published data and common clinical practice we discuss the use of mucosal delivery systems of all these antihypertensive drugs with special attention to their pharmacokinetics. We illustrate this mini-review with a case report of the prolonged-term use of mucosal delivery of sublingual Captopril and Nitrendipine combined with rectal Metoprolol tartrate and Furosemide in a patient with severe hypertension unable to receive medication p.o. This is also a report on the first human use of Furosemide-containing suppositories as well as prolonged-term transmucosal administration of these four drugs, describing a practical approach leading to successful control of severe hyperten- sion with four antihypertensive drugs delivered via the mucosal route.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article DUOCAP: the CAPSULE in CAPSULE TECHNOLOGY Kanabar Vishvesh B*, Doshi Sumit M, Patel Vipul P Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, R.K
    Kanabar Vishvesh B et al. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2015, 6 (2) INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACY www.irjponline.com ISSN 2230 – 8407 Review Article DUOCAP: THE CAPSULE IN CAPSULE TECHNOLOGY Kanabar Vishvesh B*, Doshi Sumit M, Patel Vipul P Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, R.K. University, Kasturbadham, Rajkot-Bhavnagar Highway, Rajkot, Gujarat, India *Corresponding Author Email: [email protected] Article Received on: 11/12/14 Revised on: 13/01/15 Approved for publication: 18/02/15 DOI: 10.7897/2230-8407.06220 ABSTRACT In this article, the study of never technology of capsule in solid dosage form among all in pharmaceutical dosage forms. This review includes newer trends related to capsule shell, capsule fill material, capsule sealing technique and different capsule systems to achieve modified drug release, encapsulation of various kind of materials and for modified application like mapping of the drug for clinical evaluation Either this done by capsule shell or by dosage filling in capsule dosage forms. This article mostly focuses on advancement of capsule in capsule technology. In this the study is about to reduce the frequency of dosing or to increase effectiveness of the drug by localization at the site of action, reducing the dose required, or providing uniform drug delivery. Keywords: Capsules, Chew caps, Duo caps, Hard Gelatin Capsule, Soft Gelatin Capsule, Vegetarian capsules. INTRODUCTION Since the introduction of Soft Capsule Making Machine in the 1970s, formulations have continually become more popular with The word ‘Capsule’ derived from the Latin word “capsula”, which rapid developments in recent years. This could be illustrated by means a small box or container.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Systemic Administration of Riboflavin on a Rabbit Model
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Efcacy of systemic administration of ribofavin on a rabbit model of corneal alkali burn Maksym Żuk1*, Ekaterina Lobashova2, Olga Żuk3 & Sławomir Wierzba3 Changes in the barrier mechanisms in the eye should determine the rational route for the administration and dosage of each drug in the treatment of traumatic injuries and other pathologies. The aim of this study was to examine the efcacy of intra-arterial delivery of 14C-ribofavin (as an “indicator”) and compare it with intravenous and intramuscular administration in an animal model of chemical eye burn. 14C-ribofavin (14C-I) was administered by intra-arterial (carotid artery), intravenous (femoral vein) and intramuscular (femoral muscle) routes. The total radioactivity was determined over 2 h in the plasma and structures of the rabbit’s eyes using a scintillation counter. The results of the study show that intravascular administration of 14C-I gives signifcantly higher concentrations of total radioactivity in the blood and is accompanied by a signifcant increase in the permeability of the blood- barrier and barrier in eyes sufering from burns. The highest concentration in the plasma and aqueous humour of the anterior chamber of the eye was observed during the frst hour with the intra-arterial route of administration of 14C-I in either burnt and unburnt eyes. The distribution of total radioactivity in the structures of the eye over the 2 h of the experiment showed a higher level of the drug under intra-arterial administered in the uveal regions, namely: the iris, ciliary body, choroid, retina and also the sclera and cornea.
    [Show full text]
  • Pulmonary Delivery of Biological Drugs
    pharmaceutics Review Pulmonary Delivery of Biological Drugs Wanling Liang 1,*, Harry W. Pan 1 , Driton Vllasaliu 2 and Jenny K. W. Lam 1 1 Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China; [email protected] (H.W.P.); [email protected] (J.K.W.L.) 2 School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College London, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +852-3917-9024 Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 20 October 2020; Published: 26 October 2020 Abstract: In the last decade, biological drugs have rapidly proliferated and have now become an important therapeutic modality. This is because of their high potency, high specificity and desirable safety profile. The majority of biological drugs are peptide- and protein-based therapeutics with poor oral bioavailability. They are normally administered by parenteral injection (with a very few exceptions). Pulmonary delivery is an attractive non-invasive alternative route of administration for local and systemic delivery of biologics with immense potential to treat various diseases, including diabetes, cystic fibrosis, respiratory viral infection and asthma, etc. The massive surface area and extensive vascularisation in the lungs enable rapid absorption and fast onset of action. Despite the benefits of pulmonary delivery, development of inhalable biological drug is a challenging task. There are various anatomical, physiological and immunological barriers that affect the therapeutic efficacy of inhaled formulations. This review assesses the characteristics of biological drugs and the barriers to pulmonary drug delivery.
    [Show full text]
  • Diazepam Rectal Gel (Diastat) Administration
    LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Student Health and Human Services Division District Nursing Services DIAZEPAM RECTAL GEL (DIASTAT) ADMINISTRATION I. GENERAL GUIDELINES A. PURPOSE 1. To control acute, repetitive or prolonged seizures. 2. To prevent status epilepticus, a life-threatening condition in which seizures are continuous. 3. To administer Diastat safely and in a timely manner. B. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Diazepam rectal gel (Diastat) is an “emergency anti-seizure medication” approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Education Code 49414.7 allows unlicensed school staff to administer emergency anti-seizure medication to students with acute, prolonged or repetitive seizure 2. Licensed healthcare provider and parent authorizations for medication must be completed and signed. Healthcare Provider Authorization must specify student specific seizure symptoms, including frequency, type, duration, medication dosage, potential side effects and instructions when to call the paramedics. 3. Diastat training must be student specific- demonstration. Verbalization of the following by the trainee will occur upon completion of the training: a. Identification of characteristics of student’s seizures b. Understanding of Diastat order from the licensed healthcare provider c. Location, storage and disposal of Diastat d. Appropriate steps of administration of Diastat e. Care of the student before, during and after the administration of Diastat f. Documentation of Diastat administration 4. Parent/guardian must notify the school if Diastat was administered within the past 4 hours on a school day. C. PERSONNEL 1. School nurse or school physician 2. Designated school personnel who possess current First Aid and CPR Certification and are trained by the school nurse or the school physician.
    [Show full text]
  • Intramuscular and Rectal Therapies of Acute Seizures
    Epilepsy & Behavior 49 (2015) 307–312 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Epilepsy & Behavior journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yebeh Review Intramuscular and rectal therapies of acute seizures Ilo E. Leppik a,b,c,⁎,SimaI.Patelb,c a Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA b MINCEP Epilepsy Care, University of Minnesota Physicians, Minneapolis, MN, USA c Department of Neurology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA article info abstract Article history: The intramuscular (IM) and rectal routes are alternative routes of delivery for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) Accepted 1 May 2015 when the intravenous route is not practical or possible. For treatment of acute seizures, the AED used should Available online 11 June 2015 have a short time to maximum concentration (Tmax). Some AEDs have preparations that may be given intramus- cularly. These include the benzodiazepines (diazepam, lorazepam, and midazolam) and others (fosphenytoin, le- Keywords: vetiracetam). Although phenytoin and valproate have parenteral preparations, these should not be given Intramuscular intramuscularly. A recent study of prehospital treatment of status epilepticus evaluated a midazolam (MDZ) Rectal Acute seizures autoinjector delivering IM drug compared to IV lorazepam (LZP). Seizures were absent on arrival to the emergen- Antiepileptic drugs cy department in 73.4% of the IM MDZ compared to a 63.4% response in LZP-treated subjects (p b 0.001 for supe- riority). Almost all AEDs have been evaluated for rectal administration as solutions, gels, and suppositories. In a placebo-controlled study, diazepam (DZP) was administered at home by caregivers in doses that ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 mg/kg.
    [Show full text]