The Crucifixion of Jesus Main Scripture - Matthew 27:1-51

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Crucifixion of Jesus Main Scripture - Matthew 27:1-51 The Crucifixion of Jesus Main Scripture - Matthew 27:1-51 If you have your Bible, please turn with me to Matthew 27:1-51. As we continue our study through the Bible, tonight we come to one of the most critical passages of Scripture in all the Bible. It is the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. If you watched last week, we looked at Matthew chapter 26 where we saw the betrayal and arrest of Jesus. He has now been condemned by the Jewish leaders, but they do not have the authority to crucify anyone. That authority comes only from the Pilate, who was the governor at the time. So, when Jesus was charged with blasphemy, it is now early Friday morning. The Jewish leaders take him to Pilate and demand that Pilate sentence him to death by crucifixion. Let’s pick up the story in Matthew 27:11-16. 11 Now Jesus stood before the governor, and the governor asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” Jesus said, “You have said so.” 12 But when he was accused by the chief priests and elders, he gave no answer. 13 Then Pilate said to him, “Do you not hear how many things they testify against you?” 14 But he gave him no answer, not even to a single charge, so that the governor was greatly amazed. 15 Now at the feast the governor was accustomed to release for the crowd any one prisoner whom they wanted. 16 And they had then a notorious prisoner called Barabbas. (Matthew 27:11-16) - Who was Pilate? His name was Pontius Pilate. He was the sixth Roman governor to serve in Judea. He was not liked by the Jews because he did things that deliberately violated their laws and provoked them. He was not above killing people to accomplish his purposes. The Jews did not like him, but they needed him to give the order to have Jesus crucified. So, they took Jesus to Pilate and demanded that he sentence him to death by crucifixion. When Pilate asked the crime for which Jesus was guilty, they said it was blasphemy. They said that Jesus claimed to be the King of the Jews. The Jewish leaders twisted this so that Pilate would act quickly. They said, “Pilate, this man claims to be king. And there is no king but Caesar! So, it is in the best interest of Rome to have this man sentenced to death. If you do not, you are no friend of Caesar!” Now what is interesting about this claim is that the Jews despised both Rome and Caesar. They were only trying to coerce Pilate to rule in their favor and have Jesus executed. So, when Pilate heard the charge, he had Jesus brought to him for questioning. When Pilate asked Jesus if he were the king of the Jews, Jesus said “You have said so.” And Pilate went further and said, “Do you not hear what these people are saying about you?” But Jesus did not answer. This conversation is given to us in more detail in the other gospels, but one thing is clear. This conversation convinced Pilate that Jesus was not a dangerous revolutionary who was trying to overthrow Rome or dethrone Caesar. So, Pilate said to the Jewish leaders “I find no fault in him. But the Jewish leaders would not give up. The repeated the charges and they continued to demand that Pilate sentence Jesus to death. Now Pilate was in a tough position. He wanted to solve the problem, but he did not want to bear the responsibility of sentencing Jesus to death. As a Roman governor, he was pledged to uphold the law. But as a politician, he knew he had to get along with the people and wanted to please them if possible. When he could not get Jesus to answer him, he had one more trick up his sleeve. There was a tradition of releasing one prisoner each year as an act of goodwill. Pilate had a notorious criminal named Barabbas that he was going to release. 17 So when they had gathered, Pilate said to them, “Whom do you want me to release for you: Barabbas, or Jesus who is called Christ?” 18 For he knew that it was out of envy that they had delivered him up. 19 Besides, while he was sitting on the judgment seat, his wife sent word to him, “Have nothing to do with that righteous man, for I have suffered much because of him today in a dream.” 20 Now the chief priests and the elders persuaded the crowd to ask for Barabbas and destroy Jesus. 21 The governor again said to them, “Which of the two do you want me to release for you?” And they said, “Barabbas.” 22 Pilate said to them, “Then what shall I do with Jesus who is called Christ?” They all said, “Let him be crucified!” 23 And he said, “Why? What evil has he done?” But they shouted all the more, “Let him be crucified!” (Matt 27:17-23) In the midst of all of this, Pilate’s wife warned him not to have anything to do with this mock trial. She came to him and told him very plainly not to have anything to do with the death of this man. She had a dream about this and believed he was a righteous man who was being framed. She had suffered much in her dream about him being mistreated and falsely accused. She told her husband not to get involved. So, Pilate was looking for a way to not sentence Jesus to death while at the same time to avoid a riot int he streets with the Jews. Pilate was looking for a way out. He knew the Jewish leaders well, so he was not blind to the situation. He knew that Jesus had done nothing wrong and certainly did not deserve to die. But he also knew that the Jewish leaders would stop at nothing to get their way. So, he had to come up with a plan where he would not have any part of executing Jesus while at the same time letting the Jewish leaders have what they want. Barabbas was a murderer and an insurrectionist. He was worthy of the punishment that awaited him. Even if the crowd would not proclaim Jesus innocent, surely they would recognize that Jesus was far more innocent than Barabbas! His plan was brilliant, but it didn’t work. When Pilate proposed that he release Jesus instead of Barabbas, the angry mob refused. They said in unison. Release to us Barabbas. And Pilate said, “And what shall I do with Jesus?” And the mob shouted, “Crucify him!” Let me pause here and talk about the man called Barabbas. He was a notorious criminal. He was a murderer and an insurrectionist. And yet now he is being set free. - How do you think Barabbas responded to this turn of events in his favor? Barabbas was probably both surprised and thrilled. He knew he was guilty. He knew he deserved to die. Yet for some reason, beyond his knowledge, he is now being set free. - How is this a picture of how we receive salvation? We are much like Barabbas. We are guilty of sin. And the wages of sin is death. But through his death on the cross, Jesus paid the penalty or the price of our sin. So we, just like Barabbas, have been set free. We do not deserve it. We do not understand it. It is called Grace. We can only receive it and share it with others. 24 So when Pilate saw that he was gaining nothing, but rather that a riot was beginning, he took water and washed his hands before the crowd, saying, “I am innocent of this man’s blood; see to it yourselves.” 25 And all the people answered, “His blood be on us and on our children!” 26 Then he released for them Barabbas, and having scourged Jesus, delivered him to be crucified. (Matthew 27:24-26) Pilate took three steps in an attempt to exonerate himself. First, he washed his hands and declared that Jesus was an innocent man and was not guilty of a crime. Second, he stated clearly that Jesus was a just person and not worthy of death. And third, he offered to punish Jesus and then release him. But the Jewish leaders would not accept this. They yelled at Pilate and said, “If you release this man, you are no friend of Caesar for everyone who claims to be a king is an enemy of Caesar!” Pilate knew what was right, but he gave in to the angry mob. He was more concerned with “pleasing the people” than he was in doing the right thing. Pilate looked for the easy way, and not the right way. And because of this Pilate has gone down in history as the man who condemned Jesus. - Do we sometimes look for the easy way rather than the right way? I am a people pleaser by nature. If I had my way, I would always do what people want me to do. But what I have learned over the years is that I have a greater responsibility than pleasing people. I am to please God. As Pastor of a large church, I have to make dozens of decisions vary single week. And especially in the last two months of the Coronavirus, it seems like I am making critical decisions by the day.
Recommended publications
  • THE PASSION of OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST Matthew 26:14-16, 30-27:66
    SCRIPTURE READINGS FOR PALM/PASSION SUNDAY, April 5, 2020 Trinity Lutheran Church, Portland, Oregon THE ENTRY GOSPEL + Matthew 21:1-9 When they had come near Jerusalem and had reached Bethphage, at the Mount of Olives, Jesus sent two disciples, 2 saying to them, “Go into the village ahead of you, and immediately you will find a donkey tied, and a colt with her; untie them and bring them to me. 3 If anyone says anything to you, just say this, ‘The Lord needs them.’ And he will send them immediately.” 4 This took place to fulfill what had been spoken through the prophet, saying, 5 “Tell the daughter of Zion, Look, your king is coming to you, humble, and mounted on a donkey, and on a colt, the foal of a donkey.” 6 The disciples went and did as Jesus had directed them; 7 they brought the donkey and the colt, and put their cloaks on them, and he sat on them. 8 A very large crowd spread their cloaks on the road, and others cut branches from the trees and spread them on the road. 9 The crowds that went ahead of him and that followed were shouting, “Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord! Hosanna in the highest heaven!” The Gospel of the Lord. Thanks be to God. THE PASSION OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST Matthew 26:14-16, 30-27:66 One of the twelve, whose name was Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests 15and said, "What will you give me if I deliver him over to you?" And they paid him thirty pieces of silver.16And from that moment he sought an opportunity to betray him….
    [Show full text]
  • Jesus I Am Statements in the Book of John
    Jesus I Am Statements In The Book Of John Churchill is chummiest and siege scantily as anaesthetized Bruce attests lissomely and cooed snottily. Commissarial and seely Frederic never kalsomined tartly when Bernard etiolated his Charterhouse. Tad cross-reference logographically? It from below is also noted, sell the statements jesus in of i the john distinctively presents jesus is a massive. Like certain other heir in the Bible the buck I Am statements of Jesus in addition book of John follow the progressive ten steps of God's need of redemption. I kiss that knowledge Am Wikipedia. Is Yahweh the title God? The 7 I AM Statements of Jesus OT Background & NT. Jesus is Lord above I am statements in Revelation Cregrina. Lord and salvation in china i am i statements in the jesus book of john! Daily newsletter to know you: what does it is not yet have written books, you can take away with. Talk about the scene, am of his father; the king and have you will also discussed being a bracelet at two. John's gospel has brought distinct moments where Jesus claims to war something that certain human could possibly be with language that no devout. The various I AM Statements In John Grace thru faith. The pray I lack's Of Jesus What Christians Want him Know. While before he spoke of jesus i in the john? The road AM Statements of Jesus Series Mountain Creek. Why do something explicitly clear: baháʼí publishing trust jesus, i am statements in this book is not hunger that was? Book of John accounts in detail what Jesus claimed to predict and loud He did while even earth I encourage job to desktop with big I AM statements Wrestle away the.
    [Show full text]
  • MARY MAGDALENE: a MISUNDERSTOOD BIOGRAPHY – ‘Six Men & Six Women’ Series
    MARY MAGDALENE: A MISUNDERSTOOD BIOGRAPHY – ‘Six Men & Six Women’ Series You know if you are feeling tired this morning, you should really appreciate the crew who were here at 8:00 this morning. If I have ever been teaching and felt like I needed to inject an audience with something, I just witnessed it. I mean they were tired, but they were troopers for coming out and being a part of the early service. I know that you guys are excited today because it is one of those days where we will just break our New Year commitments as we begin to go off the deep end. I mean we will be eating really well today, since it is Easter, and now we are hosed. It just goes awry from here on. So I hope you have a good Easter Sunday with good fellowship. And I hope that this morning you will sense something from God’s word that you can take away from the message that will be an encouragement to you. Let me start off with a story. Several years ago, I was serving as an associate pastor in Conway, Arkansas at Celebration Church. It was a new church, and I was there on staff. I came in one Sunday morning, and I saw my bride getting a cup of coffee. So I went up behind her and began to give her a massage on her shoulders. But then she turned around, and lo and behold, it wasn’t my wife! I was horrified in that moment. What made it even worse was she was a first time guest to our church and I never saw that lady again.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer 'Dating the Death of Jesus' Citation for published version: Bond, H 2013, ''Dating the Death of Jesus': Memory and the Religious Imagination', New Testament Studies, vol. 59, no. 04, pp. 461-475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688513000131 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1017/S0028688513000131 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: New Testament Studies Publisher Rights Statement: © Helen Bond, 2013. Bond, H. (2013). 'Dating the Death of Jesus': Memory and the Religious Imagination. New Testament Studies, 59(04), 461-475doi: 10.1017/S0028688513000131 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 Dating the Death of Jesus: Memory and the Religious Imagination Helen K. Bond School of Divinity, University of Edinburgh, Mound Place, Edinburgh, EH1 2LX [email protected] After discussing the scholarly preference for dating Jesus’ crucifixion to 7th April 30 CE, this article argues that the precise date can no longer be recovered. All we can claim with any degree of historical certainty is that Jesus died some time around Passover (perhaps a week or so before the feast) between 29 and 34 CE.
    [Show full text]
  • The City: the New Jerusalem
    Chapter 1 The City: The New Jerusalem “I saw the holy city, the New Jerusalem” (Revelation 21:2). These words from the final book of the Bible set out a vision of heaven that has captivated the Christian imagina- tion. To speak of heaven is to affirm that the human long- ing to see God will one day be fulfilled – that we shall finally be able to gaze upon the face of what Christianity affirms to be the most wondrous sight anyone can hope to behold. One of Israel’s greatest Psalms asks to be granted the privilege of being able to gaze upon “the beauty of the Lord” in the land of the living (Psalm 27:4) – to be able to catch a glimpse of the face of God in the midst of the ambiguities and sorrows of this life. We see God but dimly in this life; yet, as Paul argued in his first letter to the Corinthian Christians, we shall one day see God “face to face” (1 Corinthians 13:12). To see God; to see heaven. From a Christian perspective, the horizons defined by the parameters of our human ex- istence merely limit what we can see; they do not define what there is to be seen. Imprisoned by its history and mortality, humanity has had to content itself with pressing its boundaries to their absolute limits, longing to know what lies beyond them. Can we break through the limits of time and space, and glimpse another realm – another dimension, hidden from us at present, yet which one day we shall encounter, and even enter? Images and the Christian Faith It has often been observed that humanity has the capacity to think.
    [Show full text]
  • The “I Am” Statements of Jesus
    THE “I AM” STATEMENTS OF JESUS A Paper Presented to GraceLife Grace Research Room ___________________ by Richard K. Keller October 2019 The “I am” statements of Jesus The purpose of this paper is to briefly show the significance of the “I AM” statements Jesus makes in the book of John. The beginning will focus on the background of the phrase “I AM” in its origination and significance in the Old Testament, and how the Israelites view the nature of the statement. This will be followed by a special emphasis in both content and purpose of the seven “I am” statements and conclude with the significance of some unique “I am” phrases. The significance of the “I Am” statements made by Jesus cannot be understated, and they are unique in the Gospel of John. Some phrases clearly identify Christ with God, while others, like the seven “I am” statements, are used in conjunction with a metaphor. When Jesus uses the phrase “I am” in this sense, He is not just equating Himself with God, but equating Himself with the attributes of God such as sustainer, redeemer, protector, and guide. “In most instances, Jesus is presented as ‘exegeting’ his own significance in light of Old Testament images.”1 It will be helpful then to understand the significance of the phrase “I AM” in the Old Testament and then take a look at each of the statements in the New Testament. אֶהְ יֶה - I AM In Exodus 3 God gave Himself the title “I AM” (hayah); a phrase which literally “means the eternally self-existent being.”2 God uses the title several more times in Deut.
    [Show full text]
  • John the Baptist: Jesus Freak
    John the Baptist: Jesus Freak Matthew 3:1-2,4: In those days John the Baptist came, preaching in the wilderness of Judea 2 and saying, “Repent, for the kingdom of heaven has come near.” 4 John’s clothes were made of camel’s hair, and he had a leather belt around his waist. His food was locusts and wild honey. Luke 3:7-8,10-14: John said to the crowds coming out to be baptized by him, “You brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the coming wrath? 8 Produce fruit in keeping with repentance… 10 “What should we do then?” the crowd asked. 11 John answered, “Anyone who has two shirts should share with the one who has none, and anyone who has food should do the same.” 12 Even tax collectors came to be baptized. “Teacher,” they asked, “what should we do?” 13 “Don’t collect any more than you are required to,” he told them. 14 Then some soldiers asked him, “And what should we do?” He replied, “Don’t extort money and don’t accuse people falsely—be content with your pay.” Luke 3:19-20: But when John rebuked Herod the tetrarch because of his marriage to Herodias, his brother’s wife, and all the other evil things he had done, 20 Herod added this to them all: He locked John up in prison. Matthew 3:5-6: People went out to him from Jerusalem and all Judea and the whole region of the Jordan. 6 Confessing their sins, they were baptized by him in the Jordan River.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I: Explaining the Biblical Term 'Son(S) of God' in Muslim Contexts
    Delicate Issues in Mission Part I: Explaining the Biblical Term ‘Son(s) of God’ in Muslim Contexts by Rick Brown The Problem for Muslims n some languages and people groups, sonship terminology is used almost exclusively for direct biological relationships, i.e., it means the same as I ‘offspring’ in English. In Classical Arabic, for example, the counterparts for ‘son’ and ‘father’ mean biological son and biological father. These terms were not used metaphorically for other interpersonal relationships, not even for a nephew, a step-son, or an adopted son.1 One did not normally call someone else ibnî “my son” as a term of endearment, because it could suggest a claim of paternity, with all that this entailed. The Arabic usage contrasts signifi cantly with the situation in Hebrew and Aramaic (and Akkadian), where one could address his son, grandson, nephew, son-in-law, and neighbor’s son as bnî / brî ‘my son’ and the female counter- parts as bittî / bratî ‘my daughter’. (The plural of ‘son’ was gender inclusive.) The disciples of a prophet, rabbi, or craftsman could be called his “sons.” The citizens of a kingdom could be called the king’s “sons,” and a paramount king could refer to his vice-regent or viceregal king as his “son.” Speaking through the prophets in language the people could understand, God called his people his “son” and his faithful servants his “sons.” He was their king and the king of kings, so when he set David over them has his viceregal king, he called David his “son,” and similarly with King Solomon and a King he said would arise from their lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • An All-Consuming Passion for Jesus Appeals to the Rising Generation
    An All-Consuming Passion for Jesus Appeals to the Rising Generation John Piper An All-Consuming Passion for Jesus Appeals to the Rising Generation John Piper © 2014 Desiring God Published by Desiring God Post Office Box 2901 Minneapolis, MN 55402 www.desiringGod.org Permissions You are permitted and encouraged to reproduce and distribute this material in any format provided that you do not alter the wording in any way and do not charge a fee beyond the cost of reproduction. For web posting, a link to this document on our website is preferred. Any exceptions to the above must be ap- proved by Desiring God. Please include the following statement on any distributed copy: © Desiring God. Website: desiringGod.org Cover design and typesetting Taylor Design Works Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture quotations are from the ESV ® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version ®), copyright © 2001 by Crossway. Used by permission. All rights reserved. All emphases in Scripture quotations have been added by the author or editor. TABLE OF CONTENTS i Introduction 01 Passion for the Supremacy of God 31 Boasting Only in the Cross 51 Getting to the Bottom of Your Joy 73 Joy as the Power to Suffer in the Path of Love for the Sake of Liberation INTRODUCTION Friday morning, January 11, 2013 dawned frigid and dark in Minneapolis. John Piper finished his devotions, slid on his boots, bundled in his coat, and stepped outside to the remnants of an overnight ice storm to walk 600 slippery steps from his Minneapolis home to the door of Bethle- hem Baptist Church for the weekly prayer gathering.
    [Show full text]
  • Shared Beliefs Between Roman Catholics and Protestants
    May 27, 2018 Shared Beliefs between Roman Catholics and Protestants Recommended Book • Roman Catholics and Evangelicals: Agreements and Differences by Norman L. Geisler and Ralph E. MacKenzie (Baker Books, 1995). • James Akin, Roman Catholic, Catholic Answers Senior Apologist “This book offers a comprehensive and balanced discussion and should retire older, sensationalistic works.” Summary of Agreements “What evangelicals have in common with Roman Catholics… this includes the great fundamentals of the Christian faith, including a belief in the Trinity, the virgin birth, the deity of Christ, the creation and subsequent fall of humanity, Christ’s unique atonement for our sins, the physical resurrection of Christ, the necessity of God’s grace for salvation, the existence of heaven and hell, the second coming of Christ, and the verbal inspiration and infallibility of Scripture.” (Geisler, Roman Catholics and Evangelicals, p. 155) Areas of Agreement Shared Beliefs on the Bible High View of Scripture • “The [Catholic] Church has always venerated the divine Scriptures.” (Vatican II) Scripture is inspired (“from God”) • Inspiration deals with the source of the Bible: it’s from God (2 Tim. 3:16; 2 Pet. 1:21). • Prophets were mouthpieces for God (2 Sam. 23:2; Heb. 1:1; Dt. 18:18; “thus says the Lord” x 1700). 1 • First Vatican Council: The Old and New Testaments were “written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit… they have God as their author.” Scripture is infallible (“cannot fail or be broken”). • Jesus said it has divine authority (“it is written,” Mt. 4:7). • Jesus said it cannot perish (“not on jot or tittle will pass away until all fulfilled,” Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Origins of Antisemitism
    THE HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF ANTISEMITISM …Let me give you my honest advice. First, their synagogues or churches should be set on fire, and whatever does not burn up should be covered or spread over so that no one may ever be able to see a cinder of it. And this ought to be done for the honor of God and Christianity… (Martin Luther, 1543) When Wilhelm Marr, a 19th Century German journalist, coined the term antisemitism, he was giving a new expression to a very old hatred. Antisemitism, the hatred of Jews and Judaism, has roots of ancient origin, pre-dating the Christian era and evolving throughout the Middle Ages into the modern era. Throughout their history, Jews have been the victims of a persistent pattern of persecution, culminating finally in the 20th Century in mass murder. The term denoting hatred of the Jews – antisemitism – is spelled here and hereafter unhyphenated and in the lower case. This spelling is more historically and etymologically correct since “Semitic” refers not to a race of people, as Marr and other racists of his time wrongly believed, but to a group of languages which includes Arabic as well as Hebrew. Hence, the oft-used spelling “anti-Semitism” means, literally, a prejudice against Semitic-speaking people, not the hatred of people adhering to the Jewish religion and culture. ANTISEMITISM DURING THE PRE-CHRISTIAN ERA Expressions of anti-Jewish prejudice appeared as early as the 4th Century B.C.E. in Greece and Egypt, whose people drew stark distinction between themselves and others, whom they regarded as “strangers,” “foreigners,” or “barbarians.” Jewish religious practice, based as it was on an uncompromising monotheism and strict adherence to their religious laws and social customs, only heightened endemic suspicions and excited hostility in societies already prone to ethnocentric excess.
    [Show full text]
  • Proverbs 8 and the Place of Christ in the Trinity
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 17/1 (Spring 2006): 33–54. Article copyright © 2006 by Richard M. Davidson. Proverbs 8 and the Place of Christ in the Trinity Richard M. Davidson Andrews University Introduction: Issues The history of the interpretation of Proverbs 8 embraces an astonish- ing array of ancient and modern perspectives on this passage, ranging from the Christological debates of the early Christian centuries to the almost universal rejection of Christological interpretations in recent dec- ades. In this study I survey the gamut of interpretations, revisit the possi- bility of a Christocentric interpretation in light of recent exegetical in- sights into the passage, and explore potential implications for under- standing the place of Christ in the Trinity. This is not intended to consti- tute a comprehensive exegesis of Prov 8; rather, I build upon previous exegetical studies and suggest a theological synthesis that favors a Chris- tological reading of the text. A number of interrelated issues have surfaced from this preliminary research. I will deal with six: (1) the interpretation of “Wisdom” in Prov 8, in light of the history of research; (2) the identity of “Wisdom” in Prov 8, in light of the meaning and referent of the word }aœmo®n (traditionally translated “mastercraftsman”) in v. 30; (3) the significance of the “birth/begetting” and “installment” language in Prov 8; (4) the signifi- cance of the “mediator” language of vv. 30–31; (5) the significance of the language of “play” in vv. 30–31; and (6) the relative status between “Wisdom” and Yahweh in Prov 8.
    [Show full text]