DOCSLIB.ORG

Bujagali Energy Limited I Bujagali Hydropower Project, Uganda Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) November 2006

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bujagali Energy Limited I Bujagali Hydropower Project, Uganda Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) November 2006 El 512 VOL. 6 f BURNSiDE Public Disclosure Authorized Bujagali Hydropower Project, Uganda Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) DRAFT Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by R.J. Burnside International Limited, Canada Dillon Consultants Limited, Canada In association with Public Disclosure Authorized Ecological Writings #1, Inc., Canada Enviro and Industrial Consult (U)Ltd, Uganda Frederic Giovannetti, Consultant, France Tonkin & Taylor International Ltd., New Zealand November 2006 File No: I-A 10045 Public Disclosure Authorized of preparation. The material in this reporlt reflects best judgement in light of the information available at the time Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on or decisions made based on it, are the for damages, if responsibilities of such third parties. R. J. Burnside International Limited accepts no responsibility any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report. Bujagali Energy Limited i Bujagali Hydropower Project, Uganda Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) November 2006 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................... 1 1.1 Project Description ................................................ 2 1.2 Applicable Laws, Regulations and Policies to Public Engagement ....... ................... 2 1.2.1 The Republic of Uganda ............................................. 2 1.2.2 Project Lenders .................................................. 3 2.0 Stakeholder Analysis ............................................. 8 2.1 Areas of Influence/Stakeholders ............................................ 8 2.1.1 Description of Stakeholders .......................................... 9 3.0 Stakeholder Engagement .......................................... 11 3.1 Previous Public and Agency Consultations ................................. 11 3.2 BEL Community Engagement Activities ................................... 13 3.3 BEL Community Engagement Activities ................................... 19 3.3.1 Phase 1 - Initial Stakeholder Consultation ................................ 19 3.3.2 Phase 2 Release of the SEA Terms of Reference and Draft PCDP ................. 22 3.3.3 Phase 3 - Release of SEA Consultation Summary Report ....................... 38 4.0 Summary of Key Issues ........................................... 47 5.0 Future Consultation Events ........................................ 52 5.1 Phase 4 - Release of the SEA Report and Action Plans ......................... 52 5.2 Phase 5 - CDAP Planning Consultation ................................... 55 5.3 Phase 6: Ongoing Project Communication ............................................ 56 6.0 Disclosure Plan ................................................ 57 Tables Table 2.1: Consultation Activity Summary ............................................................ 8 Table 3.1: Summary of Previous Key Issues .............................................................. 12 Table 3.2: IFC Consultation Requirements ............................................................... 14 Table 3.3: Initial Government Agency Consultations ............................. 19 Table 3.4: Summary of Phase 1 NGO Meetings ............................................................. 24 Table 3.5: Summary of Phase 2 HPP Community Discussions .......................................... 33 Table 3.6: Summary of Issues from Kingdom Meetings .................................................... 35 Table 3.7: Key Issues/Actions from October 5 & 6, 2006 Budondo and Wakisi Community Meetings ............................................................... 39 Table 4.1: Summary of Key Issues and Responses ............................................................ 47 Table 5.1: Summary of Future (Phase 4) Consultation Activities per Stakeholder Group ............................................................... 54 Appendices Appendix A Summary of Previous Consultation Activities Appendix B Phase 1 Consultation Materials Appendix C Phase 2 Consultation Materials Appendix D Phase 3 Consultation Materials Appendix E Grievance Form R.J. Burnside International Limited IA 10045 Bujagali Energy Limited I Bujagali Hydropower Project, Uganda Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) November 2006 1.0 Introduction This document provides the Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCDP) for the Bujagali Hydropower Project (HPP) as proposed by Bujagali Energy Ltd., henceforth referred to as the "Project Sponsor" or "BEL". This PCDP outlines community engagement activities that were undertaken during the preparation of the Social and Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the HPP. This PCDP also provides an outline of planned community engagement activities that are to be undertaken leading up to and during the construction of the HPP which are to be done in association with the Community Development Action Plan (CDAP) activities. Given that the Bujagali HPP has been identified by the World Bank (WB)/International Finance Corporation (IFC) as a "Category A" project, the Project Sponsor is required to develop and implement a PCDP. A separate PCDP has also been prepared for the associated transmission line project, which is to be implemented by the Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL). The International Finance Corporation's (IFC) newly adopted SustainabilityPolicy, Performance Standards and Disclosure Policy have guided the public consultation and disclosure procedures (these policies/standards have replaced the 1998 Environmental and Social Safeguard Policies and 1998 Disclosure Policy). To be consistent with the new IFC policies as noted above, the PCDP is intended to be a means to and fully integrated with the project planning, design and implementation process so as to enhance community benefits. Similar to the SEA, the PCDP is not intended to be a "static" document that only describes what has been undertaken, but perhaps more importantly, plays a role in the overall long-term social and environmental management system for the project that sets into motion a proactive plan to enhance community benefits and minimise negative effects. The PCDP has built on public consultation and disclosure procedures carried out in 1999/2001 by the previous project sponsor, AES Nile Power (AESNP), as well as extensive public consultation carried out by the UETCL Bujagali Implementation Unit (BIU) Team since then, particularly in 2004-2005. Similar to the previous public consultations, BEL has sought to obtain alternative views on the design and construction of the hydropower facility and transmission system, including concerns of potential impacts and ways to mitigate such impacts. Based on this input, BEL has assessed alternatives and considered raised concerns in its decision-making process. Public consultation and disclosure procedures have been and will continue to be carried out in an ongoing, transparent, consistent, up-to-date and equitable manner. Relevant project information has been and will be made accessible in a timely manner and in a language understandable to the groups being consulted. Information included as part of this process has been considered in the preparation of the SEA Report and associated action plans (e.g. the CDAP). R.J. Burnside International Limited I-A 10045 2 Buiagali Energy Limited Bujagali Hydropower Project, Uganda Public Consultation and Disclosure Plan (PCOPI November 2006 1.1 Project Description The project includes a proposed 250 MW hydropower facility located at Dumbbell Island, located 8 km downstream (north) of the Town of Jinja, Uganda on the Victoria Nile. The project consists of a power station housing five 50 MW turbines and a 28 m high dam and associated spillway works (Scott Wilson Piesold, 2004). The project reservoir will occupy an area of 388 ha, approximately 80 ha of which will be newly inundated land and 308 ha of which is area currently occupied by the Victoria Nile. The SEA ToR includes a brief description of the main project components Figure 1 illustrates the project location. In addition to the hydropower generation component of the Bujagali HPP, new and/or upgraded electrical transmission facilities will be necessary to evacuate the power from the Bujagali HPP to the Uganda system grid and load centres. The transmission facilities will be developed by UECTL with assistance from BEL. 1.2 Applicable Laws, Regulations and Policies to Public Engagement The following provides an outline of applicable laws and regulations as they relate to public consultation and engagement for the Republic of Uganda and potential project lenders. 1.2.1 The Republic of Uganda National Environmental Management Policy, NEMA, 1995 Section 3.7 of the Policy specifies that the project sponsor is to involve land and resource users in all phases of environmental planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation at all levels. Participation will be an empowering process and seek to involve women and the youth in environmental planning and decision-making. Environmental Impact Assessment Regulation, NEMA, 1998 As required in Part III Section 12 of the Regulation, the following is required: * Prior to the commencement of the EIA, NEMA may decide to consult and seek public input. This is to be undertaken within four weeks of the submission of the project brief to NEMA. A public notice shall be placed inviting comments. Comments from the public shall be submitted with 21 days of the public notice requesting comments. (Note:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Unresolved Issues in the Bujagali Dam Project in Uganda
    THE UNRESOLVED ISSUES IN THE BUJAGALI DAM PROJECT IN UGANDA A LACK OF TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION 1 Strengthen democratic values, reduce poverty and injustice, JUNE 2007 promote international cooperation and advance human achievement A Publication of National This publication is funded by the Ford Association of Professional Foundation Environmentalists (NAPE) A map of Uganda showing Bujagali Dam site Source: Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL) BACKGROUND The once stalled Bujagali dam project is back for the second time on the Ugandan scene and is being fast-tracked. Many outstanding and new concerns plague the project. The project developer, Bujagali Energy Limited (BEL), is seeking financial support from the World Bank Group (WBG), African Development Bank (AfDB), European Invest- ment Bank (EIB) and others. As part of the dialogue and campaign process on the Bujagali project, Uganda’s Na- tional Association of Professional Environmentalists (NAPE), with financial support from the Ford Foundation carried-out out a public consultative process to establish whether there were still outstanding issues and concerns regarding the Bujagali proj- ect. The consultative process involved meetings with the dam-affected communities, the private sector, the academia, the dam developer (BEL), Government of Uganda, Nation- al Environment Management Authority (NEMA), the World Bank, civil society, cultural institutions and other stakeholders to obtain views and facts on the Bujagali Project. As part of the consultative process a “Peoples’ Public Hearing on the Bujagali Project” was 3 also held on the 31st March 2007 in Kampala. Source: NAPE File photo Peoples’ Public Hearing on Bujagali This publication records key issues that emerged during the consultation process, 1 Applied Energy Services Nile Power (AESNP) which remain unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • Kayunga District Statistical Abstract for 2017/2018
    Kayunga District Statistical Abstract for 2017/2018 THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA KAYUNGA DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT STATISTICAL ABSTRACT 2017/18 Kayunga District Local Government P.O Box 18000, Kayunga Tel: +256-xxxxxx September 2018 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.Kayunga.go.ug i Kayunga District Statistical Abstract for 2017/2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................... II LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. V FOREWORD .................................................................................................................................. VIII ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ................................................................................................................... IX LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................................... X GLOSSARY ..................................................................................................................................... XI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ XIII GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE DISTRICT ..................................................................... XVI CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MUKONO BFP.Pdf
    Local Government Budget Framework Paper Vote: 542 Mukono District Structure of Budget Framework Paper Foreword Executive Summary A: Revenue Performance and Plans B: Summary of Department Performance and Plans by Workplan C: Draft Annual Workplan Outputs for 2015/16 Page 1 Local Government Budget Framework Paper Vote: 542 Mukono District Foreword The District expects an annual budget of shs. 28,090,331,000 of which central grants contribute over 94.2% Donor funding 1.6% and local revenue 4.2%. The expected expenditure per department is as follows: Administration=3.8%, Finance= 4.6%, statutory bodies=3.4%, Production=8.9%, Health care= 10.8%, Education and sports= 57.1%, Works=3.8%, Water = 2.3%, Natural resource=1%, Community based=1.7%, Planning unit=2.2%, Internal audit=0 .4%. LUKE L. L. LOKUDA CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER MUKONO DISTRICT Page 2 Local Government Budget Framework Paper Vote: 542 Mukono District Executive Summary Revenue Performance and Plans 2014/15 2015/16 Approved Budget Receipts by End Proposed Budget September UShs 000's 1. Locally Raised Revenues 1,338,909 233,424 1,338,909 2a. Discretionary Government Transfers 2,860,770 715,193 2,860,770 2b. Conditional Government Transfers 25,300,550 6,174,496 25,300,550 2c. Other Government Transfers 2,759,364 1,256,460 1,734,554 3. Local Development Grant 677,694 169,423 677,694 4. Donor Funding 529,677 181,770 0 Total Revenues 33,466,963 8,730,765 31,912,477 Revenue Performance in the first quarter of 2014/15 Planned Revenues for 2015/16 Expenditure Performance and Plans 2014/15
    [Show full text]
  • Buikwe District Economic Profile
    BUIKWE DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT P.O.BOX 3, LUGAZI District LED Profile A. Map of Buikwe District Showing LLGs N 1 B. Background 1.1 Location and Size Buikwe District lies in the Central region of Uganda, sharing borders with the District of Jinja in the East, Kayunga along river Sezibwa in the North, Mukono in the West, and Buvuma in Lake Victoria. The District Headquarters is in BUIKWE Town, situated along Kampala - Jinja road (11kms off Lugazi). Buikwe Town serves as an Administrative and commercial centre. Other urban centers include Lugazi, Njeru and Nkokonjeru Town Councils. Buikwe District has a total area of about 1209 Square Kilometres of which land area is 1209 square km. 1.2 Historical Background Buikwe District is one of the 28 districts of Uganda that were created under the local Government Act 1 of 1997. By the act of parliament, the district was inniatially one of the Counties of Mukono district but later declared an independent district in July 2009. The current Buikwe district consists of One County which is divided into three constituencies namely Buikwe North, Buikwe South and Buikwe West. It conatins 8 sub counties and 4 Town councils. 1.3 Geographical Features Topography The northern part of the district is flat but the southern region consists of sloping land with great many undulations; 75% of the land is less than 60o in slope. Most of Buikwe District lies on a high plateau (1000-1300) above sea level with some areas along Sezibwa River below 760m above sea level, Southern Buikwe is a raised plateau (1220-2440m) drained by River Sezibwa and River Musamya.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Education,Science,Technology And
    Vote Performance Report and Workplan Financial Year 2015/16 Vote: 013 Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Sports Structure of Submission QUARTER 3 Performance Report Summary of Vote Performance Cumulative Progress Report for Projects and Programme Quarterly Progress Report for Projects and Programmes QUARTER 4: Workplans for Projects and Programmes Submission Checklist Page 1 Vote Performance Report and Workplan Financial Year 2015/16 Vote: 013 Ministry of Education, Science, Technology and Sports QUARTER 3: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution This section provides an overview of Vote expenditure (i) Snapshot of Vote Releases and Expenditures Table V1.1 below summarises cumulative releases and expenditures by the end of the quarter: Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases (i) Excluding Arrears, Taxes Budget by End by End End Mar Released Spent Spent Wage 11.218 9.015 9.015 8.648 80.4% 77.1% 95.9% Recurrent Non Wage 131.229 109.486 108.844 104.885 82.9% 79.9% 96.4% GoU 62.227 41.228 28.424 24.904 45.7% 40.0% 87.6% Development Ext Fin. 200.477 N/A 77.806 77.806 38.8% 38.8% 100.0% GoU Total 204.674 159.728 146.283 138.436 71.5% 67.6% 94.6% Total GoU+Ext Fin. (MTEF) 405.150 N/A 224.089 216.242 55.3% 53.4% 96.5% Arrears 0.642 N/A 0.642 0.553 100.0% 86.1% 86.1% (ii) Arrears and Taxes Taxes** 19.258 N/A 12.804 2.548 66.5% 13.2% 19.9% Total Budget 425.050 159.728 237.535 219.343 55.9% 51.6% 92.3% * Donor expenditure
    [Show full text]
  • October 21 2017 Thesis New Changes Tracked
    The Status, Rights and Treatment of Persons with Disabilities within Customary Legal Frameworks in Uganda: A Study of Mukono District By David Brian Dennison BA (honours), MBA, JD (cum laude) (University of Georgia, USA) Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Private TownLaw Faculty of Law UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN Cape of Date of submission: 31 October 2017 Supervisor: Professor Chuma Himonga University Department of Private Law University of Cape Town The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derivedTown from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes Capeonly. of Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University The copyright for this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgment of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. "ii ABSTRACT Thesis Title: The Status, Rights and Treatment of Persons with Disabilities within Customary Legal Frameworks in Uganda: A Study of Mukono District Submitted by: David Brian Dennison on 31 October 2017 This thesis addresses the question: How do customary legal frameworks impact the status, rights and treatment of persons with disabilities? It is motivated by two underlying premises. First, customary legal frameworks are highly consequential in Sub-Saharan contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Least Cost Generation Plan 2016
    THE LEAST COST GENERATION PLAN 2016 – 2025 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2013, the Authority developed a 5 year Least Cost Generation Plan (LCGP) that covered the period 2013 to 2018. An update of the LCGP has been undertaken covering a 10 year period of 2016 to 2025. The update involved review of the load forecast in light of changed parameters, commissioning dates for committed projects, costs of generation plants, transmission and distribution system investment requirements. In the update of the plan, similar to the Power Sector Investment Plan, prepared by the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development, the ”Econometric Demand” forecasting method was used at distribution level to forecast Commercial, Medium Industry and Large Industry customer category demand. A bottom up approach was used for Domestic customer category using the end-user method. A Base Case, Low Case and High Case scenario were developed for sensitivity analysis. The resultant demand forecast was 6.5%, 3.6% and 12% growth rate in energy demand for the Base Case, Low Case and High Case scenarios respectively. This growth rate is lower than the projection in the 2013 LCGP of 10%, 5% and 14% for Base Case, Low Case and High Case respectively. A number of energy supply options were considered including Hydro, Peat, Solar PV, Bagasse Cogeneration, Wind and Natural Gas. The planned supply considered already existing, committed and candidate generation plants/projects with their estimated commissioning dates aligned. We note that more than 80% of the generation will come from hydro. 1 In the demand supply balance, Figure E1 shows the demand and supply balance over the planning period.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Selected Insecticide on Whitefly
    Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development journal homepage: http://aessweb.com/journal-detail.php?id=5005 Improving Rural Livelihood through NERICA Farming: An Inquiry into Najja Sub-county in Central Uganda Dan Makosa and Nagatada Takayanagi Department of Agricultural Economics, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Sakuragaoka, Setagaya, Tokyo, Japan Abstract New Rice for Africa (NERICA) was introduced in Uganda to help rural farmers in improving their livelihood in terms of income and food security. Using the livelihood impact analysis technique, this study sought to assess the role of NERICA in improving rural livelihood by (i) understanding the production environment (ii) exploring the marketing opportunities and challenges and (iii) highlighting the changes in livelihood outcomes. The findings indicate that upland varieties are cultivated mainly in lowland areas and rural farmers prefer early maturity attribute to high productivity. Milling places also double as selling points where buyers and sellers meet. Selling milled rice fetches more profits than paddy. The most popular asset purchased from NERICA proceeds is land. The main challenges to production and marketing are inadequate extension service and high transport costs respectively. Keywords: NERICA farming, Uganda, rural livelihood, rice marketing, livelihood impact analysis Introduction1 service reforms aimed at improving the livelihood of people in terms of income, Like in the rest of the developing world, food security and socio-economic status Ugandan farmer‟s livelihood remains in a (MAAIF, 2005). Promotion of NERICA miserable state. Agriculture, a main source (New Rice for Africa), which was first of livelihood, is subsistence characterized by developed by African Rice Center, is one of use of rudimentary tools, poor quality seeds, the initiatives adopted in this context.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Power Generation (Bujagali) Project (P089659)
    MANAGEMENT RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR INSPECTION PANEL REVIEW OF THE UGANDA: PRIVATE POWER GENERATION (BUJAGALI) PROJECT (P089659); WATER MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (P123204); AND ENERGY FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION PHASE III PROJECT (P133312) Management has reviewed the Request for Inspection of the Uganda: Private Power Generation (Bujagali) Project (P089659); Water Management and Development Project (P123204); and Energy for Rural Transformation Phase III Project (P133312), received by the Inspection Panel on June 20, 2016 and registered on September 6, 2016 (RQ16/05). A second Request for Inspection for the same projects was received by the Inspection Panel on September 19, 2016 and registered on September 22, 2016 (RQ16/08). Management has prepared the following response. October 27, 2016 Bujagali, WMDP and ERT-3 Projects CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms ......................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... v I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE PROJECTS .......................................................................................................... 2 III. RELATED PLANS AND AGREEMENTS ........................................................................ 5 IV. ELIGIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of Health
    UGANDA PROTECTORATE Annual Report of the MINISTRY OF HEALTH For the Year from 1st July, 1960 to 30th June, 1961 Published by Command of His Excellency the Governor CONTENTS Page I. ... ... General ... Review ... 1 Staff ... ... ... ... ... 3 ... ... Visitors ... ... ... 4 ... ... Finance ... ... ... 4 II. Vital ... ... Statistics ... ... 5 III. Public Health— A. General ... ... ... ... 7 B. Food and nutrition ... ... ... 7 C. Communicable diseases ... ... ... 8 (1) Arthropod-borne diseases ... ... 8 (2) Helminthic diseases ... ... ... 10 (3) Direct infections ... ... ... 11 D. Health education ... ... ... 16 E. ... Maternal and child welfare ... 17 F. School hygiene ... ... ... ... 18 G. Environmental hygiene ... ... ... 18 H. Health and welfare of employed persons ... 21 I. International and port hygiene ... ... 21 J. Health of prisoners ... ... ... 22 K. African local governments and municipalities 23 L. Relations with the Buganda Government ... 23 M. Statutory boards and committees ... ... 23 N. Registration of professional persons ... 24 IV. Curative Services— A. Hospitals ... ... ... ... 24 B. Rural medical and health services ... ... 31 C. Ambulances and transport ... ... 33 á UGANDA PROTECTORATE MINISTRY OF HEALTH Annual Report For the year from 1st July, 1960 to 30th June, 1961 I.—GENERAL REVIEW The last report for the Ministry of Health was for an 18-month period. This report, for the first time, coincides with the Government financial year. 2. From the financial point of view the year has again been one of considerable difficulty since, as a result of the Economy Commission Report, it was necessary to restrict the money available for recurrent expenditure to the same level as the previous year. Although an additional sum was available to cover normal increases in salaries, the general effect was that many economies had to in all be made grades of staff; some important vacancies could not be filled, and expansion was out of the question.
    [Show full text]
  • UGANDA: PLANNING MAP (Details)
    IMU, UNOCHA Uganda http://www.ugandaclusters.ug http://ochaonline.un.org UGANDA: PLANNING MAP (Details) SUDAN NARENGEPAK KARENGA KATHILE KIDEPO NP !( NGACINO !( LOPULINGI KATHILE AGORO AGU FR PABAR AGORO !( !( KAMION !( Apoka TULIA PAMUJO !( KAWALAKOL RANGELAND ! KEI FR DIBOLYEC !( KERWA !( RUDI LOKWAKARAMOE !( POTIKA !( !( PAWACH METU LELAPWOT LAWIYE West PAWOR KALAPATA MIDIGO NYAPEA FR LOKORI KAABONG Moyo KAPALATA LODIKO ELENDEREA PAJAKIRI (! KAPEDO Dodoth !( PAMERI LAMWO FR LOTIM MOYO TC LICWAR KAPEDO (! WANDI EBWEA VUURA !( CHAKULYA KEI ! !( !( !( !( PARACELE !( KAMACHARIKOL INGILE Moyo AYUU POBURA NARIAMAOI !( !( LOKUNG Madi RANGELAND LEFORI ALALI OKUTI LOYORO AYIPE ORAA PAWAJA Opei MADI NAPORE MORUKORI GWERE MOYO PAMOYI PARAPONO ! MOROTO Nimule OPEI PALAJA !( ALURU ! !( LOKERUI PAMODO MIGO PAKALABULE KULUBA YUMBE PANGIRA LOKOLIA !( !( PANYANGA ELEGU PADWAT PALUGA !( !( KARENGA !( KOCHI LAMA KAL LOKIAL KAABONG TEUSO Laropi !( !( LIMIDIA POBEL LOPEDO DUFILE !( !( PALOGA LOMERIS/KABONG KOBOKO MASALOA LAROPI ! OLEBE MOCHA KATUM LOSONGOLO AWOBA !( !( !( DUFILE !( ORABA LIRI PALABEK KITENY SANGAR MONODU LUDARA OMBACHI LAROPI ELEGU OKOL !( (! !( !( !( KAL AKURUMOU KOMURIA MOYO LAROPI OMI Lamwo !( KULUBA Koboko PODO LIRI KAL PALORINYA DUFILE (! PADIBE Kaabong LOBONGIA !( LUDARA !( !( PANYANGA !( !( NYOKE ABAKADYAK BUNGU !( OROM KAABONG! TC !( GIMERE LAROPI PADWAT EAST !( KERILA BIAFRA !( LONGIRA PENA MINIKI Aringa!( ROMOGI PALORINYA JIHWA !( LAMWO KULUYE KATATWO !( PIRE BAMURE ORINJI (! BARINGA PALABEK WANGTIT OKOL KINGABA !( LEGU MINIKI
    [Show full text]
  • E464 Volume I1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM
    E464 Volume i1;Wj9,GALIPROJECT 4 TOMANSMISSIONSYSTEM Public Disclosure Authorized Preparedfor: UGANDA A3 NILE its POWER Richmond;UK Public Disclosure Authorized Fw~~~~I \ If~t;o ,.-, I~~~~~~~ jt .4 ,. 't' . .~ Public Disclosure Authorized Prepared by: t~ IN),I "%4fr - - tt ?/^ ^ ,s ENVIRONMENTAL 111teinlauloln.al IMPACT i-S(. Illf STATEME- , '. vi (aietlph,t:an,.daw,,, -\S_,,y '\ /., 'cf - , X £/XL March, 2001 - - ' Public Disclosure Authorized _, ,;' m.. .'ILE COPY I U Technical Resettlement Technical Resettlement Appendices and A e i ActionPlan ,Community ApenicsAcinPla Dlevelopment (A' Action Plan (RCDAP') The compilete Bujagali Project EIA consists of 7 documents Note: Thetransmission system documentation is,for the most part, the same as fhat submittedto ihe Ugandcn National EnvironmentalManagement Authority(NEMAI in December 2000. Detailsof the changes made to the documentation betwoon Dccomber 2000 and the presentsubmission aro avoiloblo from AESN P. Only the graphics that have been changed since December, 2000 hove new dates. FILE: DOChUME[NTC ,ART.CD I 3 fOOt'ypnIp, .asod 1!A/SJV L6'.'''''' '' '.' epurf Ut tUISWXS XillJupllD 2UI1SIXg Itb L6 ... NOJIDSaS1J I2EIof (INY SISAlVNV S2IAIlVNTIuaJ bV _ b6.sanl1A Puu O...tp.s.. ZA .6san1r^A pue SD)flSUIa1DJltJJ WemlrnIn S- (7)6. .. .--D)qqnd llH S bf 68 ..............................................................--- - -- io ---QAu ( laimpod u2Vl b,-£ 6L ...................................... -SWulaue lu;DwIa:43Spuel QSI-PUU'l Z btl' 6L .............................................----- * -* -SaULepunog QAfjP.4SlUTtUPad l SL. sUOItllpuo ltUiOUOZg-OioOS V£ ££.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~A2~~~~~~~~~3V s z')J -4IOfJIrN 'Et (OAIOsOa.. Isoa0 joJxxNsU uAWom osILr) 2AX)SO> IsaIo4 TO•LWN ZU£N 9s ... suotll puoD [eOT20olla E SS '' ''''''''..........''...''................................. slotNluolqur wZ S5 ' '' '' '' ' '' '' '' - - - -- -........................- puiN Z'Z'£ j7i.. .U.13 1uu7EF ...................
    [Show full text]