Vacant Land to Park Transformations As a Catalyst for Neighbourhood Change and Gentrification in Toronto, Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Vacant Land to Park Transformations As a Catalyst for Neighbourhood Change and Gentrification in Toronto, Ontario Vacant Land to Park Transformations as a Catalyst for Neighbourhood Change and Gentrification in Toronto, Ontario by Stephanie Stanov A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Geography and Planning University of Toronto © Copyright by Stephanie Stanov 2018 Vacant Land to Park Transformations as a Catalyst for Neighbourhood Change and Gentrification in Toronto, Ontario Stephanie Stanov Master of Arts Department of Geography and Planning University of Toronto 2018 Abstract Given the lack of vacant land in the City of Toronto, the redevelopment of available land tends to be highly contested. Stakeholders may advocate for the land to be developed as a park in order to increase social, economic and environmental services provided to residents, both at the neighbourhood scale and city-wide. However, concerns have emerged related to “green gentrification,” which is the exclusion or displacement of vulnerable populations through the creation of green amenities in marginalized neighbourhoods. Using a case study approach to three vacant land to park transformations, this thesis examines how neighbourhood change and gentrification are perceived by actors engaged in the park development process. Using historical analysis, stakeholder interviews, resident surveys and quantitative data analysis, this thesis reveals how the potential for park developments to accelerate gentrification is complex and highly politicized, and perceived more strongly on the ground than it is reflected in changes in quantitative data. ii Acknowledgments This thesis would not have been possible without the support of the several individuals. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. Tenley Conway, for her unwavering support and trust in my abilities throughout this project. A special thanks to Dr. Sarah Wakefield and Dr. Susannah Bunce for acting as committee members; your feedback is greatly appreciated. I would like to thank my interviewees for sharing their knowledge and experiences with me. Your work to expand and improve our city’s park system is truly inspiring. To my family and friends, thank you for understanding my absence while I dedicated my time to this endeavour. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................... iii Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... vii List of Appendices ..................................................................................................................... ix Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Vacancy in Cities: Challenges and Opportunities ............................................................. 1 1.2 Greening Vacant Land: A New Opportunity .................................................................... 4 1.3 Green Gentrification ........................................................................................................ 7 The Toronto Context ............................................................................................................ 15 2.1 A New Parkland Strategy .............................................................................................. 15 2.2 Current Avenues for Parkland Acquisition..................................................................... 17 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Case Studies: Vacant Lot to Parkland Conversions ........................................................ 22 3.2 Park Descriptions .......................................................................................................... 23 3.3 Historical Research ....................................................................................................... 26 3.4 Interviews and Survey Data Collection .......................................................................... 26 3.5 Resident Survey Collection and Data Analysis .............................................................. 29 3.6 Quantitative Data Analysis ............................................................................................ 32 Park Histories ....................................................................................................................... 36 4.1 Sorauren Park ................................................................................................................ 36 4.2 Woodbine Park .............................................................................................................. 40 4.3 Wychwood Barns Park .................................................................................................. 50 iv Interview Results .................................................................................................................. 58 5.1 Engagement and Activism ............................................................................................. 58 5.2 Politics .......................................................................................................................... 67 5.3 Conflict ......................................................................................................................... 69 5.4 Social and Housing Change ........................................................................................... 73 Survey Results ..................................................................................................................... 81 6.1 General Attitudes Towards the Parks ............................................................................. 81 6.2 Neighbourhood Character .............................................................................................. 85 6.3 Neighbourhood Socio-Demographics ............................................................................ 87 6.4 Neighbourhood Change and Gentrification .................................................................... 90 Quantitative Data Analysis ................................................................................................... 99 7.1 Neighbourhood Socio-Demographics ............................................................................ 99 7.2 Housing Data .............................................................................................................. 109 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 118 8.1 Perceptions of Neighbourhood Change and Gentrification ........................................... 118 8.2 Politics of Vacant Land to Park Development .............................................................. 122 8.3 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 126 8.4 Future Directions ......................................................................................................... 127 8.5 Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................. 128 References .............................................................................................................................. 130 Appendices ............................................................................................................................. 138 v List of Tables Table 3.1. List of Interviewees by Park ..................................................................................... 28 Table 3.2. Variables Analyzed, Including Description and Source ............................................. 33 Table 3.3. Census Years Included in Quantitative Data Analysis ............................................... 34 Table 3.4. Renaming of Sorauren Park Census Tracts ............................................................... 35 Table 6.1. Responses Given for Neighbourhood Benefits of Parks ............................................ 81 Table 6.2. Responses Given for Ways Parks Build Community ................................................. 82 Table 6.3. Perceptions of Negative Impacts Related to Parks..................................................... 83 Table 6.4. Responses Given as Reasons for Feeling Unsafe in the Park ..................................... 85 Table 6.5. Responses About Ways Park Neighbourhoods are Changing .................................... 97 vi List of Figures Figure 2.1. Vacant Land and Parks Per Capita in Toronto Census Tracts ................................... 20 Figure 2.2. High Vacancy and Low Parks Compared with City of Toronto Neighbourhood Improvement Areas ................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 3.1. Locations of Case Studies Across the City of Toronto ............................................. 22 Figure 3.2. Example of 500-Metre Walking Distance Boundary, Woodbine Park ...................... 30 Figure 3.3. Example of Census Tract
Recommended publications
  • Port Lands Planning Framework APPENDICES
    433 Port Lands Planning Framework APPENDICES Port Lands Planning Framework 434 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Appendix 1 PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 435 Port Lands Planning Framework Photographic Archive (Top, middle, bottom) Participants photographing the Port Lands during the site tour Port Lands Planning Framework 436 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Image Credit: Adam Nicklin 437 Port Lands Planning Framework Image Credit: City of Toronto, City Planning Port Lands Planning Framework 438 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Image Credit: Joe Lobko 439 Port Lands Planning Framework Image Credit: Lauren Abrahams Port Lands Planning Framework 440 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Image Credit: Adam Nicklin 441 Port Lands Planning Framework Image Credit: (top) Marc Ryan (bottom) Lauren Abrahams Port Lands Planning Framework 442 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Image Credit: (top) Brenda Webster (bottom) Michael Holloway, Toronto 443 Port Lands Planning Framework Image Credit: (top) John Wilson (bottom) Cassidy Ritz Port Lands Planning Framework 444 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Image Credit: Lori Ellis Image Credit: Cassidy Ritz 445 Port Lands Planning Framework Image Credit: (top) Melissa Tovar (bottom) Cassidy Ritz Port Lands Planning Framework 446 APPENDIX PORT LANDS CHARRETTE PHOTOGRAPHIC ARCHIVE 1 Image Credit: (top) Adrian Litavski 447 Port Lands Planning Framework Image Credit: (top) Lori Ellis (bottom)
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Event Schedule (March 16, 2016) April Ward Councillor Location Address Sat
    2016 Event Schedule (March 16, 2016) April Ward Councillor Location Address Sat. April 2 8 Perruzza Black Creek Pioneer Village 1000 Murray Ross Prkwy (east of Jane St., off Steeles Ave.) Sat. April 2 20 Cressy Central Technical School 725 Bathurst St. (enter off Harbord St. & Borden St.) Sat. April 9 40 Kelly Agincourt Mall 3850 Sheppard Ave. E. (at Kennedy Rd.) Sat. April 9 12 Di Giorgio Amesbury Arena 155 Culford Rd (south of Lawrence Ave. W., east of Black Creek Dr.) Sat. April 16 11 Nunziata Weston Lions Arena 2125 Lawrence Ave. W Sat. April 16 13 Doucette City Parking Lot 2001 Lake Shore Blvd. (east of Ellis Ave.) Sat. April 23 14 Perks Sorauren Park Along Wabash Ave. (south of Dundas St. W.) Sat. April 23 33 Carroll Enbridge Gas West Parking Lot 500 Consumers Rd. (west of Victoria Park Ave.) Sat. April 30 28 McConnell Lower Sherbourne (David Crombie Park) Along Frederick St. (south of The Esplanade) Sat. April 30 19 Layton Fred Hamilton Park Along Shaw St. (south of College St.) May Sat. May 7 35 Berardinetti SATEC @ W.A. Porter Collegiate Institute 40 Fairfax Cres. (west of Warden Ave.) Sun. May 8 21 Mihevc Wychwood Barns Along Wychwood Ave. (south of St. Clair Ave. W.) Thurs. May 12 34 Minnan-Wong Donwoods Plaza 51-81 Underhill Dr. (north of Lawrence Ave. E.) Sat. May 14 18 Bailao Dufferin Mall Parking Lot 900 Dufferin St. (south of Bloor St.) Sat. May 14 4 Campbell Richview Collegiate Institute 1738 Islington Ave. (at Eglinton Ave. W.) Thurs.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
    City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane
    [Show full text]
  • Wychwood Park Wychwood Park Sits on a Height of Land That Was Once the Lake Iroquois Shore
    Wychwood Park Wychwood Park sits on a height of land that was once the Lake Iroquois shore. The source for Taddle Creek lies to the north and provides the water for the pond found in the centre of the Park. Today, Taddle Creek continues under Davenport Road at the base of the escarpment and flows like an underground snake towards the Gooderham and Worts site and into Lake Ontario. Access to this little known natural area of Toronto is by two entrances one at the south, where a gate prevents though traffic, and the other entrance at the north end, off Tyrell Avenue, which provides the regular vehicular entrance and exit. A pedestrian entrance is found between 77 and 81 Alcina Avenue. Wychwood Park was founded by Marmaduke Matthews and Alexander Jardine in the third quarter of the 19th century. In 1874, Matthews, a land- scape painter, built the first house in the Park (6 Wychwood Park) which he named “Wychwood,” after Wychwood Forest near his home in England. The second home in Wychwood Park, “Braemore,” was built by Jardine a few years later (No. 22). When the Park was formally established in 1891, the deed provided building standards and restrictions on use. For instance, no commercial activities were permitted, there were to be no row houses, and houses must cost not less than $3,000. By 1905, other artists were moving to the Park. Among the early occupants were the artist George A. Reid (Uplands Cottage at No. 81) and the architect Eden Smith (No. 5). Smith designed both 5 and 81, as well as a number of others, all in variations of the Arts and Crafts style promoted by C.F.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2008
    2008 Special thanks to our volunteer photographers: Alan Dunlop (including cover), Catherine Guillame Chow, Dario Sante and Julian Sale. DAREarts EMPOWERING AT RISK CHILDREN DAREarts is arts education that empowers ‘at risk’ children. This is the best day of my life. DAREarts child, 9 DAREarts dares children to make positive choices in their lives through educational experiences in art, architecture, dance, drama, design, fashion, literature, music, – all the arts. You are saving this child from the wrong crowd. Principal DAREarts is a national, not-for-profit organization which stands for Discipline, Action and Responsibility in Education. DAREarts’ 5-year all-the-arts program empowers ‘at risk’ 9–14 year olds who have been chosen from elementary schools in less advantaged areas to become leaders. The children paint, sculpt, sing, dance, compose, design, write, act and create as they ‘travel’ through the centuries exploring world cultures, guided by arts professionals. The children gain self esteem and leadership skills and then return to their schools to teach their classmates. Since 1996, DAREarts has flourished in Ontario and is expanding across Canada, influencing over 10,000 children yearly. For more information, visit www.darearts.com DAREarts Foundation Inc. 3042 Concession 3 Adjala, RR 1, Palgrave, Ontario, Canada L0N 1P0 • 1-888-540-2787 / 905-729-0097 Canadian CharitaBle Registration NUMBer 88691 7764 RR0002 DareArts’ Aboriginal Youth Program: DareArts From past participation in the Canadian Armed Force’s Junior Letter to Rangers camps, DareArts’ artists-as-teachers worked in the remote northern aboriginal community of Webequie to help to combat teen suicide and inspire the youth while building Members their self-esteem.
    [Show full text]
  • Trailside Esterbrooke Kingslake Harringay
    MILLIKEN COMMUNITY TRAIL CONTINUES TRAIL CONTINUES CENTRE INTO VAUGHAN INTO MARKHAM Roxanne Enchanted Hills Codlin Anthia Scoville P Codlin Minglehaze THACKERAY PARK Cabana English Song Meadoway Glencoyne Frank Rivers Captains Way Goldhawk Wilderness MILLIKEN PARK - CEDARBRAE Murray Ross Festival Tanjoe Ashcott Cascaden Cathy Jean Flax Gardenway Gossamer Grove Kelvin Covewood Flatwoods Holmbush Redlea Duxbury Nipigon Holmbush Provence Nipigon Forest New GOLF & COUNTRY Anthia Huntsmill New Forest Shockley Carnival Greenwin Village Ivyway Inniscross Raynes Enchanted Hills CONCESSION Goodmark Alabast Beulah Alness Inniscross Hullmar Townsend Goldenwood Saddletree Franca Rockland Janus Hollyberry Manilow Port Royal Green Bush Aspenwood Chapel Park Founders Magnetic Sandyhook Irondale Klondike Roxanne Harrington Edgar Woods Fisherville Abitibi Goldwood Mintwood Hollyberry Canongate CLUB Cabernet Turbine 400 Crispin MILLIKENMILLIKEN Breanna Eagleview Pennmarric BLACK CREEK Carpenter Grove River BLACK CREEK West North Albany Tarbert Select Lillian Signal Hill Hill Signal Highbridge Arran Markbrook Barmac Wheelwright Cherrystone Birchway Yellow Strawberry Hills Strawberry Select Steinway Rossdean Bestview Freshmeadow Belinda Eagledance BordeauxBrunello Primula Garyray G. ROSS Fontainbleau Cherrystone Ockwell Manor Chianti Cabernet Laureleaf Shenstone Torresdale Athabaska Limestone Regis Robinter Lambeth Wintermute WOODLANDS PIONEER Russfax Creekside Michigan . Husband EAST Reesor Plowshare Ian MacDonald Nevada Grenbeck ROWNTREE MILLS PARK Blacksmith
    [Show full text]
  • December 1982
    TORONTO FIELD NATURALIST Number 352, December 1982 Br-id~ing the years ••• Sec page 2 TFN 352 This Month's Cover "The Old Mill Bridge", sketched in the field by Mary Cumming In May 1840 a British army officer visited William Gamble's flourmill at the site of the present Old Mill and wrote this interesting description of the Humber Valley where the Old Mill Bridge now stands : "This mi 11 is on the right bank of the Humber about three mi 1es from the 1ake in a small circular valley bounded partly by abrupt banks and partly by rounded ;1 knolls . At the upper end the highlands approach one another forming a narrow i gorge clothed with heavy masses of the original forest. The basin of the gorge ! is completely filled by the river, which issues from it in a narrow stream flow­ j ing over a stony channel; but below the mill the water becomes deep and quiet i and deviates into two branches to form a small wooded island. "Close to the water's edge is a large mill surrounded by a number of small cottages over the chimneys of which rose the masts of flour barges; and on the bank above, in the midst of green lawn bounded by the forest is a neat white frame mansion commanding a fine view of this pretty spot. 11 The circular valley referred to is presumably the former Marsh 8, now part of King's Mill Park immediately downstream from Bloor Street, which was then used for pasture and cornfields.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 Frank Crescent, Toronto on M6G3K5 Virtual Tour 2016-05-16, 12:41 PM
    20 Frank Crescent, Toronto ON M6G3K5 Virtual Tour 2016-05-16, 12:41 PM 20 FRANK CRESCENT, TORONTO ON M6G3K5 PRICE: $1,985,000 MLS #: C3484977 PROPERTY STYLE: 2.5 Storey PROPERTY TYPE: Residential BATHROOMS: 2 BEDROOMS: 5 PARKING: 3 STOREYS: 2 WATER SUPPLY: Municipal LAND SIZE: 55.00 x 106.00 EXTERIOR FINISH: Brick BASEMENT: Fully finished, Walk-out FUEL: Gas(natural) HEATING: Hot water GARAGE/DRIVEWAY: Attached, Triple drive FIRE PROTECTION: Alarm System NEARBY: Schools, Public Transit, Park, Playground, Recreation PROPERTY FEATURES: Eat-in kitchen Separate dining room In-lawIn-law suitesuite Alarm system Fireplace PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: An Elegant And Stately Home, On A Quiet Tree-Lined Street In Bracondale Hill, Steps To Hillcrest Park, Schools & Wychwood Barns Market. A 1930'S Architectural Style With 3,400Sf Of Living Space, A Classic Center Hall Plan With Great Bones. Large Living & Dining Rooms Perfect For Entertaining. Great Renovation Opportunity. Finished Bsmnt Walks Out To Large, Fenced, Tree'ed Backyard Garden. Attached Garage With Private Drive For 3. Open House Sat/Sun 2-4. Incl: Fridge,Stove,Washer & Dryer, Elfs And Window Coverings. Exclude Center Hall Chandelier. Floor Plans And Home Inspection Available Upon Request; [email protected]. No Survey. Most Plumbing And Electricals Upgraded Within 15 Yrs. http://houssmax.ca/vtour/c2289130#.Vzn3Wpnmgfg.email Page 1 of 4 20 Frank Crescent, Toronto ON M6G3K5 Virtual Tour 2016-05-16, 12:41 PM OPEN HOUSE SCHEDULE: Please call for a showing. VIDEO Welcome to 20 FrankGALLERY Crescent
    [Show full text]
  • June 1990 OHS Bulletin, Issue 66
    QEIi:::r.2z 5151 Yonge Street Willowdalc, Ontario MZN SP5 Hands on History Holiday By Lorraine Lowry wheat, and learn the intricacies and the products of your labours Workshop Co-ordinator of quillwork (paper filigree) as to take home as momentos of well as embroider a sampler. this unique experience. Homespun and hand made ar- This programme is designed This programme will be ticles from the past are modern for both the interested beginner presented in memory of witnesses to the skills that early and the spirited professional. It Elizabeth Campbell who shared Ontario settlers used on a daily will give the participants a basic her very special skills and basis in their homes, on their introduction to each of the craffs knowledge with so many people. farms and in their shops. and skills so that they can be When Elizabeth passed away Everyone in 19th century On- pursued either for personal in- suddenly in the Fall of 1988, tario had a working knowledge terest or for group programmes. The Gibson House Volunteers of a wide range of handcrafts that made a generous donation to were needed to survive, to pro- The same programme will be The Ontario Historical Society vide decoration and to bring offered on July 9, 10 and 11 and in her memory and those funds good luck to their families. again on August 10, 11 and 12 will now be used to support the Hands on History Holiday from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. two Hands on History Holi- will explore some of those crafts daily at Black Creek Pioneer day programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • TO360 Year One Round Two Consultation Report
    Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy (Phase III) – Year One, Round Two Consultation, March 2018 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................1 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 1 & 2 .....................................................................................................6 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 3 ........................................................................................................... 12 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 4 ........................................................................................................... 20 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 5 & 6 ................................................................................................... 28 This Consultation Report documents feedback shared in the March 2018 Local Mapping Open Houses for TO360 — Phase III. It was shared with participants for review before being finalized. Background Toronto 360 (TO360) is an effort to help people find their way by making streets, neighbourhoods, and the city more legible. Following the successful completion of a pilot project in the Financial District in 2015, the City began a five-year city-wide rollout in 2017. This rollout is focused on developing a map database that will support the future production of wayfinding maps. In Year One of the rollout, the TO360 team is developing the map database in an area bounded roughly by Lake Ontario, Royal York Road, St. Clair Avenue, and Warden Avenue. In
    [Show full text]
  • Thoroughbred
    A Publication of the Pennsylvania Horse Breeders Association PAThoroughbred pabred.com September 2020 pabred.com Issue 78 REPORT Northview PA Under Transition Loving the PA- Wellbourne Farms of Pennsylvania LLC will carry on the unparalleled stallion and Bred Racing broodmare services the Mid-Atlantic region has become accustomed to at the Pennsylvania facility. Program Page 10 Thirty years ago, a 4-year-old who has earned six figures would have been a multiple stakes winner. In 2020 that is far from the case, Page 3 especially when the horse can PA-Breds at the earn bonuses in the lucrative Yearling Sales Pennsylvania-Bred program.. Page 11 PA Day At the Races Social Media Entries, past performances postings and the entire program for the Labor Day Monday, Sept. Spinaway, Boisterous, All the Way Jose, 7 card that features five Jump Start and Fortheluvofbourbon have stakes can be found online. had featured posts in recent weeks. Page 33 Page 5 Millionaires Row The Pennsylvania Horse Racing Association’s series on Pennsylvania-Bred millionaires A Letter from celebrates and remembers some of the greatest racehorses the Executive Secretary Page 25 keystone state has produced. Up Brian Sanfratello this month are Bessarabian, Tom’s Ready and Master Command. Page 9 ConfidentSW Yellow 6911 Daisy SW 7027 DerbyshireSW 6741 SW 6910 Well-Bred Brown Griffin SW 7026 JOHN DEERE John Deere offers substantial discounts on everything from mowers SHERWIN WILLIAMS and tractors to GatorsTM, hay equipment and construction pieces. • The MSRP Program – Professional operations can save up to 28% on select Save up to 40% discount on equipment Sherwin Williams paints, in-store • The Cash Bonus Program – All members can save up to $2,700 with vouchers products and wall coverings.
    [Show full text]
  • Existing City of Toronto Dogs Off-Leash Areas Study October
    City Wide Study of Existing City ooff Toronto Dogs Off-Leash Areas (OLA) Background The City of Toronto’s Parks Standards & Innovations Unit is leading an interdivisional study to examine how the City’s existing Dog Off-Leash Areas (OLAs) can be reimagined to better harmonize with existing park uses, provide a satisfying user experience, and operate with optimum efficiency. This study is Work Plan a result of the recommendation in the Parks & Recreation Facilities Master Plan Phase One March 2019 (2017) to “develop criteria for improving existing dog off-leash areas.” Building Understanding This study will explore common issues, global best practices, and potential Review and Synthesis of Background Materials solutions in an effort to develop design solutions to help improve the City’s April 2019 existing OLAs. The City will select eight case study sites and examine the variety of challenges and opportunities in OLAs of different size, context, and character. External Stakeholder Consultation #1 Ultimately, the Study will strive to address common issues, reflect consideration June 2019 of a range of perspectives and needs, and propose site-specific recommendations that could apply to OLAs City-wide Internal Stakeholder Consultation July 2019 External Stakeholder Consultation #2 Why Now August 21st 2019 The City has heard that OLAs could be better Public Survey #1 Improving existing OLAs will help the City maintain a successful park amenity. Early September 2019 Toronto’s population (human and dog) is increasing With more pets and dogs living in the City there is an increased demand to Site Tour of 10 Case Studies Phase Two Early September 2019 accommodate them in public space like parks.
    [Show full text]