FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 31 • NUMBER 197
Tuesday, October 11,1966 • Washington, D.C. Pages 13109-13161
Agencies in this issue— • Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Agriculture Department Civil Aeronautics Board Civil Service Commission Commerce Department Consumer and Marketing Service Engineers Corps Federal Aviation Agency Federal Communications Commission Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Maritime Commission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Fiscal Service Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Housing and Urban Development Department Immigration and Naturalization Service Interstate Commerce Commission Post Office Department Social Security Administration Detailed list o f Contents appears inside. Volume 79
UNITED STATES STATUTES AT LARGE
[89th Cong., 1st Sess.l
Contains laws and concurrent resolu cluded are: a subject index, tables of tions enacted by the Congress during prior la\^s affected, a numerical listing 1965, reorganization plans, a proposed of bills enacted into public and private amendment to the Constitution, and law, and a guide to the legislative his Presidential proclamations. Also in- tory of bills enacted into public law.
Price: $9.25
Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration
Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402
r r n m M V » S w Published dally, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or r r l l r r l / l I 11 ■ 111 ^ I ■ i f on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, Nations I Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration (mail address National Area Code 202 Phone 963-3261 Archives Building, Washington, D.C. 20408), pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1935 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 8B ), under regulations prescribed by the .Ad“?f?r istrative Committee of the Federal Register, approved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I ) . Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of. Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. , , The F ederal R egister wiU be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $1.50 per month or $15 per year, payaDie advance. The charge for individual copies varies in proportion to the size of the issue (15 cents for the first 80 pages and 5 cent® V, each additional group of 40 pages, as actually boun d). Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. . The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code op F ederal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pu suant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended. The Code op F ederal R egulations is sold by the Superintendent Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal R egister issue of each month. tions There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal R egister or the Code op F ederal R egulatio Contents a d v is o r y c o m m is s io n o n CONSUMER AND MARKETING FEDERAL HOME LOAN INTERGOVERNMENTAL SERVICE BANK BOARD RELATONS Rules and Regulations Notices Advances; restrictions______— 13152 Rules and Regulations Fruit; shipment limitations: Avocados grown in South Flor Employee responsibilities and con ida ______* ___13135 FEDERAL MARITIME duct ------13113 Grapefruit grown in Arizona COMMISSION and California______13134 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Proposed Rule Making Notices George Co.; revocation of li SERVICE Cranberries; expenses and rate of cense______;— 13156 Rules and Regulations assessment, 1966-67 ; unexpend ed funds and handler reports— 13136 Imports and exports; commuted FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION Milk in Northwestern Ohio mar travel time allowances------13114 keting area ; recommended deci- Notices AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION sion ______t______13136 Landa Oil Co. et al.; findings and Prunes, dried, produced in Cali order______— 13153 AND CONSERVATION SERVICE fornia; receiving by handlers— 13136 Rules and Regulations Notices FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM Cotton, extra long staple, 1967; Peanuts; outgoing quality------13147 Notices acreage allotments and market Ohio Citizens Trust Co.; order ap ing quotas------13132 DEFENSE DEPARTMENT proving application for merger Sugar; continental requirements, of banks______— ------— 13145 quotas and deficits, 1966______13133 See Engineers Corps. FISCAL SERVICE AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT ENGINEERS CORPS Notices See also Agricultural Research Rules and Regulations Service; Agricultural Stabiliza Buffalo Insurance Co.; termina tion and Conservation Service; Anchorages and danger zones; tion of authority to qualify as Consumer and Marketing Serv Hudson River, N.Y., and Straits surety on Federal bondsl______13155 ice. of Florida and Florida Bay, Fla_ 13129 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Notices FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY Areas for emergency loans: Rules and Regulations New York______13147 Rules and Regulations Hunting at Merritt Island Na tional Wildlife Refuge, Fla., et Texas and Colorado______13147 Control zone and transition area; al______— 13130 alteration______13115 ARMY DEPARTMENT Restricted area/military c l i m b Notices See Engineers Corps. corridor and transition area; National Wildlife Refuge System; revocation and alteration_____ :■ 13115 areas qualifying for study— 4.— 13146 CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Standard instrument approach p r o c e d u r e s ; miscellaneous FOOD AND DRUG ADMINIS Notices amendments______' 13116 Hearings, etc.: Transition area; alteration______13115 TRATION Aloha and Hawaiian show cause Rules and Regulations order______13148 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Food additives; synthetic terpene Baby poultry rates______13148 resins for chewing gum base____ 13128 Northeast-Bahamas s e r v i c e COMMISSION case______13149 Notices HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND Ozark-Central merger______13148 U n io n Speditions-Gesellschaft Hearings, etc.: WELFARE DEPARTMENT m.b.H------13149 Community Communicators of See Food and Drug Administra Ohio, Inc., and David Joseph tion; Social Security Adminis CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Kittel______13149 tration. Daily Express, Inc., et al______13149 Rules and Regulations Kentucky Central Television, HOUSING AND URBAN Excepted service: Inc., and W B LG -T V , Inc____ 13149 Lorain Community Broadcast DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Navy Department______13113 ing Co. et al. (2 documents)__13149, Notices Post Office Department______13113 13151 Authority: Select Commission on Western Martorell, Luis Prado, and Hemisphere Immigration-___ 13113 Assistant Secretary and Deputy, Augustine L. Cavallaro, Jr___13151 Metropolitan Development; Morris, Mary Jane, and James COMMERCE DEPARTMENT delegation______£ ______13148 R. Searer______— — 13151 Regional administrators and Rules and Regulations Osborne, Marvin H ______13152 deputies; redelegations______13148 W TC N Television, Inc. (W T C N - Vehicle and highway safety______13128 TV ) et al______13152 (Continued on next page) 13111 13112 CONTENTS
IMMIGRATION AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE SOCIAL SECURITY NATURALIZATION SERVICE COMMISSION ADMINISTRATION Rules and Regulations Notices Rules and Regulations Nonimmigrants; waiver of certain Fourth section applications for re Federal old-age, survivors and grounds of excludability------13114 lief______13157 disability insurance; child’s ben Notices Pennsylvania; drought order------13156 Motor carrier: efits______13126 Organization; issuance and pub Temporary authority applica lication of regulations------13156 tions______13157 Transfer proceedings (2 docu TREASURY DEPARTMENT INTERIOR DEPARTMENT ments) ______- ____ 13158,13159 See Fiscal Service. See Fish and Wildlife Service. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT See Immigration and Naturaliza tion Service. POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT Notices ZIP code; presorting of bulk, sec ond- and third-class mail------13145
List of CFR Parts Affected (Codification Guide)
The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. . . . , A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1966, and specifies how they are affected.
5 CFR 8 CFR 21 CFR ______13128 213 (3 documents)------— 13113 212______- ______- 13114 121_ 1700_____ 13113 9 CFR 23 CFR 7 CFR 97______— ______13114 Ch. i i ...... 13128 722______13132 811______- ______13133 14 CFR 33 CFR 909______13134 71 (3 documents)------1------— 13115 202. _____ 13129 915______„ , ______13135 73______- ______13115 204. ____ 13129 P roposed R u l e s : 97______13116 929— ______^ ______13136 50 CFR 993______13136 20 CFR 13130 1041______13136 404______13126 32_. 13113 Rules and Regulations
mission on Western Hemisphere Immi part shall be reviewed by the Executive Title 5— ADMINISTRATIVE gration are excepted under Schedule A. Director. When this review indicates a Effective on publication in the F ederal conflict of interest of an employee or spe R eg ister , § 213.3191 and paragraph (a) cial Government employee of the Com PERSONNEL thereunder are added as set out below. mission and the performance of his serv ices for the Government, the Executive Chapter I— Civil Service Commission § 213.3191 Select Commission on West Director shall have the indicated conflict ern Hemisphere Immigration. PART 2T3— EXCEPTED SERVICE brought to the attention of the employee (a) All positions on the Commissionor special Government employee, grant Department of the Navy staff. the employee or special Government em Section 213.3108 is amended to show (5 U.S.C. 3301, 3302, E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, ployee an opportunity to explain the indi that positions of Medical Intern at the 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) cated conflict, and attempt to resolve the U.S. Naval Hospital in Bethesda, Md„ are indicated conflict. If the indicated con U n it e d S t ates C iv il S erv in Schedule A when filled by Medical In flict cannot be resolved, the Executive ic e C o m m is s io n , terns of the D.C. General Hospital. E f Director shall forward a written report [ s e a l ] M a r y V . W e n z e l , fective on publication in the F ederal Executive Assistant to on the indicated conflict to the Chair R egister, subparagraph (11) is added to the Commissioners. man, Advisory Commission on Intergov paragraph (a) of § 213.3108 as set out ernmental Relations. [F.R. Doc. 66-11054; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; below. 8:49 ajn .] § 1700.735—103 Disciplinary and other §213.3108 Department o f the Navy. remedial action. (a) General. * * * Chapter VII— Advisory Commission An employee or special Government (11) Positions of Medical Intern at the on Intergovernmental Relations Ü.S. Naval Hospital, Bethesda, Md., when employee of the Commission who violates filled by persons serving medical intern PART 1700— EMPLOYEE RESPONSI any of the regulations in this part or ships at the District of Columbia Gen BILITIES AND CONDUCT adopted under § 1700.735-101 may be eral Hospital. Employment under this Pursuant to and in accordance with disciplined. The disciplinary action may authority may not exceed 1 month. This be in addition to any penalty prescribed authority shall be applied only to posi sections 201 through 209 of Title 18 of tions the compensation of which is fixed the United States Code, Executive Order by law for the violation. In addition to, in accordance with the provisions of 5 11222 of May 8, 1965 (30 F.R. 6469), and or in lieu of, disciplinary action, remedial Title 5, Chapter I, Part 735 of the Code U.S.C. 5351-5356. action to end conflicts or appearance of of Federal Regulations, Chapter V II is ***** added to Title 5 of the Code of Federal conflicts of interest may include but is (5 U.S.C. 3301, 3302, E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, Regulations, consisting of Part 1700, not limited to: 3 CFR, 1954-1953 Ccxmp., p. 218) reading as follows: (a) Changes in assigned duties; U n it e d S tates C i v il S erv Sec. (b) Divestment by the employee of his ic e C o m m is s io n , 1700.735- 101 Adoption of regulations. conflicting interests; or Review of statements of em [ seal] M a r y V . W e n z e l , 1700.735- 102 (c) Disqualification for a particular Executive Assistant to ployment and financial in the Commissioners. terests. assignment. 1700.735- 103 Disciplinary and other re [F.R. Doc. 66-11052; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; medial action. § 1700.735—104 Gifts, entertainment, 8:49 a.m.} 1700.735- 104 G ifts , entertainment, and and favors. favors. The Commission authorizes the excep 1700.735- 105 Outside employment. PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE 1700.735- 108 Specific provisions of Com tions to 5 CFR 735.202(a) set forth in mission regulations govern 5 CFR 735.202(b) ( l ) - ( 4 ) . Post Office Department ing special Government Section 213.3111 is amended to show employees. § 1700.735—105 Outside employment. that the position of Administrative As 1700.735-109 Statements of employment and (a) An employee of the Commission sistant to the Assistant to the Regional financial interest. Director (St. Louis Region) is no longer A u t h o r it y : The provisions of this Part may engage in outside employment or excepted under Schedule A. Effective 1700 issued under E.O. 11222, 30 F.R. 6469, other outside activity not incompatible on publication in the F ederal R eg ist e r , 3 CFR, 1965 Supp.; 5 CFR 735.101, et seq. with the full and proper discharge of the subparagraph (6) of paragraph (a) of § 1700.735—101 Adoption o f regula duties and responsibilities of his Govern § 213.3111 is revoked. tions. ment * employment. An employee who (5 U.S.C. 3301, 3302, E.O. 10577, 19 F.R. 7521, Pursuant to 5 CFR 735.104(f), the Ad engages in outside employment shall re a CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 218) visory Commission on Intergovernmental port that fact in writing to his supervisor. Relations (referred to hereinafter as the U n it e d S tates C iv il S er v (b) Employees and special Govern Commission) hereby adopts the follow ic e C o m m is s io n , ment employees of the Commission may [ seal] M a r y V . W e n z e l , ing sections of Part 735 of Title 5, Code Executive Assistant to of Federal Regulations: 735.101, 735.102, engage in teaching, writing, and lectur the Commissioners. 735.202 (a ), (c ), (d ), (e), 735.210, 735.- ing; provided, however, employees and 302, 735.303(a), 735.304, 735.305(a), 735.- [F.R. Doc. 66-11053; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; special Government employees shall not 8:49 a.m.) 403 (a>, (b ), 735.404, 735.411, 735.412 (b) receive compensation or anything of and (d ). These adopted sections are monetary value for any consultation, modified and supplemented as set forth discussion, writing, lecturing, or appear PART 213— EXCEPTED SERVICE in this part. ance the subject matter of which is de § 1700.735—102 Review o f statements Select Commission on Western of employment and financial inter voted substantially to the specific respon Hemisphere Immigration ests. sibilities, programs, or operations of the Section 213.3191 is added to show that Each statement of employment and Commission, or which draws substan Positions on the staff of the Select Com financial interests submitted under this tially on official data or ideas which have
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13114 RULES AND REGULATIONS not been published or otherwise publicly delayed effective date is unnecessary in released by the Commission. The fore Title 8— ALIENS AND this instance because the rule prescribed by the order relates to agency procedure. going limitation on the receipt of com pensation or anything of monetary value NATIONALITY Dated: October 5,1966. shall not be construed as applying to Chapter I— Immigration and Natural R a y m o n d F. F ar r ell, amounts received for reimbursement for ization Service, Department of Jus Commissioner of travel and other expenses incurred in tice Immigration and naturalization. performing the outside employment. PART 212— DOCUM ENTARY RE [F.R. Doc. 66-11020; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; § 1700.735—108 Specific provisions o f 8:46 a.m.] Commission regulations governing QUIREMENTS: NONIMMIGRANTS; special Government employees. WAIVERS; ADMISSION OF CER TAIN INADM ISSIBLE ALIENS; (a) The term “special Government Title 9— ANIMALS AND employee” as used in this part means an PAROLE officer or employee who is retained, desig Waiver of Certain Grounds of ANIMAL PRODUCTS nated, appointed, or employed by the Excludability Commission to perform, with or without Chapter I— Agricultural Research compensation, for not more than 130 The following amendment to Chapter Service, Department of Agriculture days during any period of 365 consecu I of Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regu tive days, temporary duties either on a lations is hereby prescribed; PART 97— OVERTIME SERVICES RE full-time or intermittent basis. The second sentence of subparagraph LATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS (b) Special Government employees (1) Section 212(a) (6) (tuberculosis) of Administrative Instructions Prescrib shall adhere to the standards of conduct paragraph (b) Section 212(g) (tuber applicable to employees set forth in this culosis and certain mental conditions) of ing Commuted Travel Time Allow part and adopted under § 1700.735-101, § 212.7 Waiver of certain grounds of ex ances except that 5 CFR 735.203(b) is not ap cludability is amended to read as fol Pursuant to the authority conferred plicable to a special Government em lows: “The statement shall include the upon the Director of the Animal Health ployee. name and address of the facility where Division by § 97.1 of the regulations con (c) Pursuant to 5 CFR 735.305(b) , the the alien will be treated, and shall af cerning overtime services relating to im Commission authorizes the same excep firm (i) that arrangements have been ports and exports, effective August 18, tions concerning gifts, entertainment, made for any treatment and observa 1964 (9 CFR 97.1), administrative in and favors for special Government em tion required for proper management of structions (9 CFR 97.2) effective July 30, ployees as are authorized for employees the alien’s condition, in conformity with 1963, as amended May 18, 1964 (29 F.R. by § 1700.735-104. local standards of medical practice, and 6318), December 7, 1964 (29 F.R. 16316), § 1700.735—109 Statements o f employ that upon arrival at such facility the April 12, 1965 (30 F.R. 4609), June 21, ment and financial interests. alien will be placed in an inpatient or 1965 (30 F.R. 7893), and June 7,1966 (31 outpatient status as determined by the F.R. 8020), prescribing the commuted (a) In addition to the employees re responsible local physician; (ii) that travel time that shall be included in each quired to submit statements of employ such facility will submit the following period of overtime or holiday duty, are ment and financial interests under 5 CFR to the U.S. Quarantine Station, Rose- hereby amended by adding to or deleting 735.403 (a) and (b ), employees in the bank, Staten Island, N.Y. 10305: An ini from the respective “lists” therein, as following named positions, shall submit tial report giving a clinical evaluation of follows: statements of employment and financial the alien, including necessary X -ray W it h in M etropolitan Area interest to the Executive Director. films, within 30 days after the alien’s Assistant Director, Taxation and Finance. arrival at the hospital or other institu one HOUR Assistant Director, Governmental Structure tion (or, if within 30 days after receipt A dd: Galveston, Tex. and Functions. A dd: Texas City, Tex. Senior Analyst, Taxation and Finance. of notice from the U.S. Public Health THREE HOURS (b) The statement of employment Service that the alien has arrived in the and financial interests required by this United States he has not reported to the A dd: Freeport, Tex. section shall be submitted by the Execu facility, a notice of his failure to report), O utside M etropolitan Area tive Director to the Chairman of the and a report of the final disposition of THREE HOURS Commission. the case; and (iii) that complete finan (c) A statement of employment and Add: San Pedro (Palom inas), Ariz. (served cial arrangements for charges which from Douglas, Ariz.). financial interests is not required under might be made for the alien’s care have Add: Antler, N. Dak. (served from Minot, this part from Members of the Commis N. Dak.). sion. Members of the Commission are been made by the alien, the sponsoring pour hours subject to 3 CFR 100.735-31 and are re family member, or other responsible per Add: Wauna, Oreg. (served from Portland, quired to file a statement only if re son; or that the eligibility of the alien Oreg.). quested to do so by the Counsel to the under the dependents medical care pro five h ours President. visions of sections 1071-1085 of Title 10 Add: Douglas, Ariz. (served from Lochiel, This Part 1700 was approved by the of the United States Code has been estab Ariz.). Add: San Pedro, Ariz. (served from Nogales, Civil Service Commission on August 19, lished.” Ariz.). 1966. (Sec. 103, 66 Stat. 173; 8 U.S.C. 1103) Add: Antler, N. Dak. (when served from This Part 1700 shall become effective This order shall be effective on the date Portal, N. Dak.). upon publication in the F ederal R e g ister . of its publication in the F ederal R eg six hours W m . G . C o l m a n , is t e r . Compliance with the provisions Add: Antler, N. Dak. (when served from Executive Director. of section 553 of Title 5 of the United Bismarck, N. D ak.). [F.R. Doc. 66-11015; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; States Code (P.L. 89-554, 80 Stat. 383) These commuted travel time periods 8:46 a.m.] ^ as to notice of proposed rule making and have been established as nearly as may
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13115 be practicable to cover the time neces the 5-mile radius zone to 2 miles SE of the in § 71.181 (31 FJt. 2149), the transi sarily spent in reporting to and returning VORTAC. tion area is amended to read: from the place at which the employee In § 71.181 (31 F.R. 2149) the Mobile, G reat Bend, K a n s . performs such overtime or holiday duty Ala., 700-foot transition area is amended That airspace extending upward from 700 when such travel is performed solely on to read: feet above the surface within a 7-mile radius account of such overtime or holiday duty. M obile, Al a . of:Great Bend Municipal Airport (latitude Such, establishment depends upon facts That airspace extending upward from 700 38°20'50" N., longtitude 98°51'47" W .); and within the knowledge of the Animal feet above the surface within an 8-mile ra within 2 miles each side of the 301° bearing Health Division. dius of Bates Field (latitude 30°41'17.7" N., from Great Bend Municipal Airport, extend It is to the benefit of the public that longitude 88°14'26.6'' W .); within 8 miles ing from the 7-mile radius area to 10 miles these instructions be made effective at SW and 5 miles NE of the Bates Field lo NW of the airport; and that airspace extend the earliest practicable date. Accord calizer N W course extending from 5 miles SE ing upward from 1200 feet above the surface within 5 miles NE and 8 miles SW of the 301 ° ingly, pursuant to the provisions of sec to 12 miles NW of the OM; within an 8-mile radius of Brookley AFB (latitude 30°37'39'' bearing from Great Bend Municipal Airport, tion 4 of the Administrative Procedure N., longitude 88°04'10" W.); and within 2 extending from the airport to 14 miles NW Act (60 Stat. 238), it is found upon good miles each side of the Brookley VORTAC of the airport. cause that notice and public procedure 140° radial extending from the VORTAC to (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; on these instructions are impracticable, 12 miles SE. 49 U.S.C. 1348) unnecessary, and contrary to the public (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958; Issued in Kansas City, Mo., on Sep interest, and good cause is found for 49 Ü.S.C. 1348(a) ) making these instructions effective less tember 27, 1966. ' Issued in East Point, Ga., on Septem than 30 days after publication in the D a n ie l E. B a r r o w , ber 30, 1966. Federal R eg ister . (64 Stat. 561) Acting Director, Central Region. These revised administrative instruc J am e s G . R o gers, tions shall be effective upon publication Director, Southern Region. [F.R. Doc. 66-11005; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] in the F ederal R e g ist e r . [F.R. Doc. 66-11004; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 8:45 a.m.] Done at Hyattsville, Md., this 5th day of October 1966. [Airspace Docket No. 66-EA-76] [Airspace Docket No. 66-CE-75] G . H . W is e , PART 71— designation o f f e d Acting Director, Animal Health pa r t 71— designation o f fed er a l AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR Division, Agricultural Re er a l AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS search Service. SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS [FR. Doc. 66-11046; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; PART 73— SPECIAL USE AIRSPACE 8:48 a.m j Alteration of Transition Area Revocation of Restricted Area/Mili- The purpose of this amendment to tary Climb Corridor and Alteration Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula of Transition Area Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND tions is to alter the Great Bend, Kans., transition area. The purpose of these amendments to SPACE The following controlled airspace is Parts 71 and 73 of the Federal Aviation presently designated in the Great Bend, Regulations is to revoke the Langley Air Chapter I— Federal Aviation Agency Kans., terminal area: The Great Bend, Force Base, Va., Restricted Area/Mili- SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE Kans., transition area is designated as tary Climb Corridor, R-6610, and remove that airspace extending upward from 700 [Airspace Docket No. 66-SO-72] reference to this area from the descrip feet above the surface within a 7-mile tion of the Norfolk, Va., transition area. PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FED radius of Great Bend Municipal Airport The U.S. Air Force submitted a request ERAL AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIR (latitude 38°20'50" N., longitude 98°52'- to revoke R-6610 stating in the proposal 00" W .), and within 2 miles each side of SPACE, AND REPORTING POINTS that alternate procedures either have the 305° bearing from the Great Bend been or are being developed by the FAA Alteration of Control Zone Municipal Airport, extending from the 7- which will permit desirable interceptor and Transition Area mile radius area to 10 miles N W of the departure routings from Langley AFB. airport; and that airspace extending up Since this restricted area/military On August 27, 1966, a notice of pro ward from 1,200 feet above the surface climb corridor was designated solely for posed rule making was published in the within 5 miles NE and 8 miles SW of the use of the military, revocation thereof Federal R egister (31 F.R. 11399) stating 305° bearing from Great Bend Municipal will reduce the burden on the public. that the Federal Aviation Agency was Airport, extending from the airport to Therefore, notice and public procedure considering amendments to Part 71 of 14 miles N W of the airport. thereon are unnecessary and the amend the Federal Aviation Regulations which Since designation of the Great Bend, ment may be made effective in less than would alter the Mobile, Ala., transition Kans,, transition area, the special instru 30 days. area and the Mobile, Ala. (Bates Field), ment approach procedure that it was In consideration of the foregoing, Parts control zone. designated to protect has been modified, 71 and 73 of the Federal Aviation Regula Interested persons were afforded an and there has been a slight change in tions are amended, effective immediately, opportunity to participate in the rule the airport coordinates. In addition, a as hereinafter set forth. making through the submission of com public instrument approach procedure is 1. In § 73.66 (31 F.R. 2339) R-6610 ments. All comments received were being established. The public procedure Hampton Roads, Va. (Langley AFB), favorable. will require the same controlled airspace Restricted Area/Military Climb Corridor In consideration of the foregoing, Part protection that is required for the special is revoked. 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations procedure. 2. In § 71.181 (31 F.R. 2231) Norfolk, is .amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., Decem This amendment does not include any Va., delete the last sentence. additional controlled airspace. The ber 8,1966, as hereinafter set forth. (See. 307(a), .the Federal Aviation Act of In § 71.171 (31 F.R. 2065) the Mobile, changes are in coordinates and are minor 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1348) Ala. (Bates Field), control zone is in nature. No additional burden is im amended to read : posed upon any person and, therefore, Issued in Washington, D.C., on Sep notice and public procedure hereon are tember 30,1966. M obile, A l a . (B ates F ield) unnecessary. W il l ia m E. M o r g an , Within a 5-mile radius of Bates Field In consideration of the foregoing, Part Acting Director, Air Traffic Service. 30°^1,17.7" N., longitude 88° 14' 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is î within 2 miles each side of the amended, effective 0001 e.s.t., December [F.R. Doc. 66-11008; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; bile VORTAC 113° radial extending from 8, 1966, as hereinafter set forth. 8:45 am .]
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13116 RULES AND REGULATIONS
SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [Reg. Docket No. 7635; Arndt. 504] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classifi cation now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is repub lished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administra tive Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows: * . ; ; J'-'V;' ; - 1. By amending the following automatic direction finding procedures prescribed in § 97.11(b) to read: A D F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings,'headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. , ... _ ■. _ , , . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be m accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, rmiftss an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less More than Minimum Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance 65 knots More than (feet) 65 knots or less 65 knots
TOF RBn (final)...... Direct______1100 T -d n — ...... 300-1 300-1 300-1 T O F R B n ' ______Direct.. ______1900 C -dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1J* T O F R B n ...... Direct...... 1900 A -d n ______N A NA NA T O F R B n ...... Direct______1900
Radar available. Procedure turn N side of crs, 334° Outbnd, 154° Inbnd, 1900' within 10 miles. M inimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 11007. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 154°—2.2 miles...... __ ...... ,. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.2 miles after passing T O F R Bn, make left-climbing turn to 1900', return to T O F RBn. Hold N W , 154° Inbnd, 1-minute left turns. „ , . " . N otes: (1) Use Boston altimeter setting. (2) Monitor Boston T R A C O N frequency until landing assured. (3) Approach from a holding pattern not authorized, procedure turn required. (4) State-owned facility must be monitored aurally during approach. M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°— 1500'; 090°-180°—1500'; 180s-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—2000'. City, Beverly; State, Mass.; Airport name, Beverly Municipal; Elev., MS'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., T O F ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 17 Aug. 63
Direct______3000 T -d n ______500-1 500-1 500-1 Direct______:____ 3000 C -d n ...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)* S K A V O R Direct______3000 A -d n *______800-2 800-2 800-2
Radar available. Procedure turn W side crs, 187° Outbnd, 007° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Facility on airport. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1100'. , __, _ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within Omile after passmg P W T RBn, make immediate right turn, climb to 2000' on crs, 187° from Kitsap R B n within 10 miles. C a u t io n : 1761' terrain, 2.5 miles N of airport. _ * Alternate mirtimnms not authorized when control zone not effective. Use Seattle altimeter setting when control zone not effective. M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2100'; 090°-180°—2000'; 180°-270°—7700'; 270°-360°—8800'. City, Bremerton; State, Wash.; Airport name, Kitsap County; Elev., 482'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., P W T .; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 27 May 65
r.B TOM 2500 T -dn_—______300-1 300-1 2004 * A P E V O R — 600-1)* C M L O M -_ — C B L O M . 2500 C -d n .______500-1 500-1 r.B T.OM 2500 S-dn-10R...... 500-1 500-1 600-1 Dublin Int___ 800-2 Plain City Int. CB T.OM 2500 A -d n ______800-2 800-2
Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 280* Outbnd, 100® Inbnd, 2500' within 10 miles of C B LO M . M inimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2500'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 100°—5.6 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.6 miles after passing C B LO M , climb on a heading of 096* to 2700' and proceed to C M LO M , hold E, 1-minute right turns, 276® Inbnd. M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—2600'. City, Columbus; State, Ohio; Airport name, Port Columbus International; Elev.,,816'; Fäc. Class., LO M ; Ident., C B ; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66, Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 14 Mar. 64
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13117
A D F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less More than Minimum 2-engine, Course and Condition From— To— altitude more than distance 65 knots More than (feet) 65 knots or less 65 knots
C B L O M ... ______— Direct...... 2500 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 2 0 0 4 3 C B L Ö M ...... - ...... - ...... Direct...... 2500 C -dn ...... 500-1 600-1 500-1)3 CM L O M .— -----——...... --- ...... Direct...... 2500 S-dn-10L...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 Dublin Int------>------(TR L O M ...... Direct...... 2500 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 Plain City Int...... — C B L O M ______
P ro c u re tu rn fs side of crs, 276° Outbnd, 096° Inbnd, 2500' within 10 miles of C B LOM . Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2500'. Uvisual cratacTn^estSilisheîuiKÎn descent toauthorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.8 miles after passing C B LO M , climb straight ahead to 2700' and proceed direct to C M LO M , hold E, 1-minute right turns, 276° Inbnd. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000-360°—2600'. Citv Columbus- State, Ohio; Airport name, Port Columbus International; Elev., 816'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., C B ; Procedure No. 3, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. wry, uoiumuus, ^ ’ Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 14 Mar. 64
PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 29 OCT. 1966. Citv Columbus- State Ohio; Airport name, Port Columbus International; Elev., 816'; Fac. Class., B H ; Ident., CM H ; Procedure No. 4, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 14 Mar. 64; Sup. ’ Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 15 Sept. 62
C V L O M - ...... Direct______2000 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-)3 C V L O M . ______— Direct...... 2300 C -dn...... 400-1 600-1 500-1)3 C V L Ö M ...... — ...... Direct______2700 S-dn-36______400-1 400-1 400-1 Direct...... 2400 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 CV LOM (final)...... Direct...... 2000 Mount Healthy Int._------. ------C V L O M .l...... Direct______2400
Radar available. „ . „ ...... Procedure turn E side of crs, 180° Outbnd, 360° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 360°—3.8 miles...... _ .... . ,, . T ... , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landmg not accomplished within 3.8 miles after passmg LO M , climb to 2000 on crs, 360° to the SI LOM . Hold N , 1-minute right turns, 180° Inbnd. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2800/; 090°-360°—2300'. City Covington- State, Ky.; Airport name, Greater Cincinnati; Elev., 890'; Fac. Class., L 6 M ; Ident., CV ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 19; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 18; Dated, 2 Nov. 63
L O M ...... i ...... Direct...... 2100 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 *20O4£ L O M ...... Direct...... 2100 C -dn ...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)3 KW VOR LOM...... Direct______2100 S-dn-21______500-1 600-1 500-1 L Ö M ...... Direct...... 2100 A - d n ...... ______800-2 800-2 800-2 LÖM ...... —...... Direct...... 2100 LOM ...... - ...... - ...... Direct...... 2100 L O M ...... Direct______2100 LOM ...... - Direct...... 2100 OWB VO R LOM ...... —...... Direct______2100 LOM ...... Direct...... 2100 LOM ...... Direct...... 2400
Procedure turn N side of crs, 035° Outbnd, 215° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 215°—6 miles...... ,...... T .. . . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landmg not accomplished withm 6 miles after passmg LO M , make left-climbing turn, climb to 2100' on 180° crs to E W R 080° and proceed to E W V O R or when directed by A T C , (1) make climbing right turn to 2100' on 305° crs and proceed to Princeton Int via E W V O R R 013°. Caution: Radio tower, 993' M SL, 3.6 miles SW of airport. *300-1 on runways 9-27. „ - , — ' MSA within 25 miles of facility: OOOMWO0—1900'; 090°-180°—2100'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270o-360°—2000'. City, Evansville; State, Ind.; Airport name, Dress Memorial; Elev., 389'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., E V ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. N o .l; Dated, 1 Sept. 62
M H T R B n ...... Direct...... 2200 T -d n ...... 500-1 500-1 NA C -dn ...... 800-1 800-1 N A A -d n ______1000-2 1000-2 N A
Procedure turn N side of crs, 058° Outbnd, 238° Inbnd, 2200'within 10 miles. v Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2200'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 238°—7.5 miles. . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landmg not accomplished within 7.5 miles after passing M H T RBn, make a right- «nmbing turn to 2200' direct M H T R Bn. Hold N E of M H T R Bn, 238° Inbnd, 1-minute right turns. Notes: (1) State-owned facility and must be monitored aurally during approach. (2) Use Manchester altimeter setting. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3000'; 090o-180°—2000'; 180°-270 —3000'; 270o-360°—3500'. City, Nashua; State, N .H .; Airport name, Boire Field; Elev., 193'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., M H T ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 5 Dec. 64
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 No. 197------2 13118 RULES AND REGULATIONS
A D F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, From— T o— distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots
Direct...... 3300 T -d n ______500-1 500-1 NA C -d n ______600-1 600-1 NA A -d n . ______1000-2 1000-2 NA
Procedure turn N side of crs, 317® Outbnd, 137® Inbnd, 3300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1700'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 137®—3.9 miles. ,,, . , , , , „ , , , rrTT.T, « . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.9 miles after passing A M H R Bn, climb to 1500' on 137° bearing from A M H R B n within 5 miles, then make left-climbing turn to 3300' direct A M H R Bn, hold N W , 1-mlnute right turns, 137 Inbnd. N otes: (1) Use Manchester altimeter setting. (2) Approach from a holding pattern not authorized, procedure turn required. M S A within 25 miles of facUity: 000°-090°—3000'; 090 -180°—2000'; 180°-270°—3500'; 270°-360°— 4500'. City, Nashua; State, N .H .; Airport name, Boire Field; Elev., 193'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., A M H ; Prodecure No. 2, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 1 May 65
P Y Y P R n Direct______—- 4500 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 C -d n ...... 700-1 700-1 A -d n ...... NA NA
Procedure turn S side of crs, 090® Outbnd, 270° Inbnd, 4500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3600'. Facility on airport. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing P Y X R B n turn right, climb to 4500' on 090° bearing from P YX R B n within 20 miles. N otes: (1) Facility operated by city. Authorized for public use. (2) Weather service not available. (3) Altimeter from G A G E FSS. (4) Procedure not com- pletely contained within controlled airspace. M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000 -360°— 4500'. - City, Perryton; State, Tex.; Airport name, Municipal; Elev., 2915'; Fac. Class., MHW; Ident., P Y X ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66
Direct______2500 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 300-1 C -dn ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-3—...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A -d n ______N A NA NA
Procedure turn W side of crs, 210® Outbnd, 030° Inbnd, 1700' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 030°—3.5 miles...... _ __ __ . , , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.5 miles after passing R E D RBn, make Ieft-climt>- ing turn to 1700' direct R K D R Bn, hold SW of R E D R Bn, 030° inbnd, 1-minute, left turns. . • . , , _ . . ___ N otes: (1) Use Augusta altimeter setting. (2) City owned facility must be monitored aurally during approach. (3) Approach from a holding pattern not authorized, pro cedure turn required. (4) Air carriers with weather service at the airport—alternate minimums of 800-2 authorized. Use Rockland altimeter setting. M S A within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090®—2500'; 090°-270°— 1500'; 270®-360°—2000'. City. Rockland; State, Maine; Airport name, Rockland Municipal; Elev., 60'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., R E D ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 29 Qct. 66; Sup. Arndt. " ' No. 3; Dated, 20 July 63
A Y Y R B n ...... Direct______1500 T -d n ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-10...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2
Procedure turn S side of crs, 275° Outbnd, 095° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 095®—0.2 mile. . _ ...... 9n If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landmg not accomplished within 0.2 mile, climb to 1500' on crs of 095 within 20 mues. •Caution: Standard obstruction clearance not provided N of the runway. When necessary to circle N of airport, 700' ceiling minimums apply due to 422 towers, 1.6 miies « In the vicinity of A W E H H W , M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-360°—1500'. Wake Island; Airport name, Wake; Elev., 14'; Fac. Class., M H W ; Ident., A X X ; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 10 Oct. 59
20044 Woodstown V O R . L O M ...... - ...... - ...... Direct______16Ö0 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 C -dn ...... — 800-2 800-2 800-2 S-dn-1___ ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2 If Stack Int received, the following minim appiy: C -dn...... 500-1 600-1 600-1)4 S-dn-1...... 500-1 600-1 600-1
Procedure turn W side of final approach crs, 194® Outbnd, 014° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum Altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1600'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 014°—5.3 miles. . „ . _ i«r» tnm If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles after passing LO M , mure climDing ieiv w to 1600' and return to Wilmington LOM . Hold S, Wilmington LO M , 1-minute right turns, 014° Inbnd. C a u t io n : Turn left as soon as practical to avoid holding pattern at Philadelphia LO M . M SA within 25 miles of facility: 270°-090°—2000'; 090°-2708—1500'. City, Wilmington; State, Del.; Airport name) Greater Wilmington; Elev., 79'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., IL ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 7f Dated, 8 Feb. 64
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13119
A D F Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocédure— Continued
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and To— altitude Condition 2-engine, From— distance more than (feet)__ 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots
O R L O M ...... L...... Direct______— 2400 T-dn#______300-1 300-1 200-J4 Direct...... 2400 C -dn___f,...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)4 Sutton Int______Direct...... 3000 S-dn-33______500-1 500-1 500-1 OR LOM (final)...... Direct______2100 A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2
Procedure turn E side of crs, 152° Outbnd, 332° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 332°— 4 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.4 miles after passing O R L O M or at the LM M, make an immediate left-climbing turn to 2400' direct to O R LO M , hold SE of O R LO M , 332° Inbnd, 1-minute right ten s, Caution: 1663' radio tower, 1.9 miles N N W of airport; 1180' lighted obstruction, 0.7 mile W of approach end Runway 11. Departure procedures: Departure Runway 33—Execute left-climbing turn as soon as practicable after take off to 300° heading, climbing to 2000' before proceeding northeast- bound. Departure Runway 2—Climb to 2000' on a heading of 050° before making a left turn. #300-1 required for takeoffs on Runway 29. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090?’—3500'; 090°-180°—2500'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—3500'. Citv. Worcester; State, Mass.; Airport name, Worcester Municipal; Elev., 1009'; Fac. Class., LO M ; Ident., O R ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 10; Eft. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. , No. 9; Dated, 9 July 66 2. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange (VO R ) procedures prescribed in § 97.11(c) to read: V O R Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. Ran instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, • From— T o - distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots
Bismarck R Bn ______B IS V O R ______Direct...... 3400 T - d n % - .— — . 300-1 300-1 20044 R 060°, BIS V O R clockwise...... __ R 093°, B IS V O R ...... Via 6-mile D M E 3400 C -d _— ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1)4 C -n — ...... 400-1)4 600-1)4 500-1)4 R 093°, B IS V O R . . . .____ 1...... Via 6-mile D M E 3400 800-2 800-2 800-2 Arc. 6-mile DM E Fix, R 093°...... B IS V O R (fin al)...... Direct...... 2700
Procedure turn N side of crs, 093° Outbnd, 273° Inbnd, 3400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2700'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 273°—3.6 miles. If visual contact not.established upon descent to authorized lauding minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.6 miles after passing B IS V O R . climb to 4000' on R 263° BIS V O R within 20 miles, or when directed by A T C , make right-climbing turn to 4000' on R 336° B IS V O R within 20 miles. Final approach from holding pattern at V O R not authorized, procedure turn required. %When weather is below 1800-2 aircraft departing southwestbound, flight below 3900' beyond 6 miles from airport is prohibited between R 175° and R 230° inclusive of the BIS VOR due to 3373' tower, 10 miles SSW of airport. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3400'; 090°-180°—3600'; 180°-270°—4400'; 270°-360°—3400'. City, Bismarck; State, N . Dak.; Airport name, Bismarck Municipal; Elev., 1677'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R T A C ; Ident., B IS ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 9; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 20 Aug. 66
T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 NA C -d ...... 900-1 900-1 NA C -n ...... 900-2 900-2 NA A -d n ______■N A NA NA DME minimums D M E equipment required:* C -d ...... 700-1 700-1 N A C -n ...... 700-2 700-2 NA
■ Procedure turn N W side of ers, 059° Outbnd, 239° Inbnd, 2900' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2900'; over 6-mile D M E Fix, R 239°—2100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 239°—9.1 miles. cotejct not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 9.1 miles after passing Chardon V O R or at 9-mile uMiS Fix, R 239°, make left-climbing t e n to 3000', return to Chardon V O R , hold N E , 1-minute right turns, 239° Inbnd, Note: Use Cleveland, Ohio, altimeter setting. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-180°— 2300'; 180°-270°—3000'; 270°-360°—2600'.
City, Chagrin Falls; State, Ohio; Airport name, Chagrin Falls; Elev.. 1239'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R T A C ; Ident., C X R ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66- Su d . Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 13 Aug. 66
New Baltimore Int C V G V O R ______2400 30O-1 200-14 Madeira R Bn. C V G V O R ______2700 C -dn 400-1 union In t.... 600-114 C V G V O R ...... Direct...... 2400 800-2 800-2 800-2
Radar available. , ...... , . - ..... i n ^ dure to™ E side of crs, 223° Outbnd, 043° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles’ n ™ sititude over facility on final approach crs, 15007. crs and distance, facility to airport, 043°—2.3 miles. crs 360° tn t h iP îv T 5 °t established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 2.3 miles after passing C V G V O R , climb to 2500' on Notf w Ü New Baltimore Int, hold N , 1-minute right turns, 186° Inbnd. MSA horized by A T C , D M E may be used within 10 miles at 2700' to position aircraft for approach with elimination of procedure turn. ‘uoA. witnin 25> miles of facility:facilitv: 000°-090°000°-090°—2800'; 090°—360°—2300'. v tty, Covington; State, Ky.; Airport name, Greater Cincinnati; Elev., 890'; Fac. Class., L -V O R T A C ; Ident., C V G ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 8; Eft. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. ______Arndt. No. 7; Dated, 20 Apr. 63
PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 29 OCT. 1966. y. Covington; State, K y.; Airport name, Greater Cincinnati; Elev., 890'; Fac. Class.. B V O R T A C ; Ident., C V G ; Procedure No. 2, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 20 Apr. 63; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 7 July 62
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13120 RULES AND REGULATIONS
VOR Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure—Continued
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, From— To— distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots
R 330°, D D C V O R ...... Via 6-mile D M E 4100 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-14 Arc. C -dn ...... 500-1 500-1 500-114 r 330° v n u Via Ornile D M E 4100 S-dn-14...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 Arc. A-dn__ ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 6-mile D M E Fix, R 330°, D D C V O R ...... DDC VOR (final)...... Direct...... 4100
Procedure turn W side of crs, 330° Outbnd, 150° Inbnd, 4100' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 4100'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 160°—5.3miles...... _ .... . , , , , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing mmimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.3 miles, after passing D D C V O R , make left turn, climbing to 4100' on R 330° within 10 miles, make left turn and return t o D D C V O R . M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3800'; 090°-180°—3900'; 180°-270°—4500'; 270°-360°—3800'. City Dodge C ity State Kans.; Airport name, Dodge City Municipal; Elev., 2594'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R T A C ; Ident., D D C ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 9; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 5 June 65
T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-H C -dn ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1}$ S-dn-22______400-1 400-1 400-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2
Procedure turn N side of crs, 051° Outbnd, 231° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1300'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 231°—3.7miles. , . .... _ _ .. , _T ,mT1 ,. . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.7 miles after passing E L D V O R,climb to 1800' on R 226° E L D V O R within 20 miles; when authorized by A T C , D M E 10-mile arc at 1800' may be used between R 340° clockwise to R 139 to position aircraft on final approach with elimination of procedure turn. _ _ , ____ „„„„ M SA within 25 miles of facfiity: 000°-090°—1400'; 090°-180°— 2500; 180°-270—18007; 270 -360 — 1400. City E l Dorado; State, Ark.; Airport name, Goodwin Field; Elev., 277'; Fac. Class., B V O R ; Ident., E L D ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 3; Dated, 26 Sept. 64
R 1«0° FA R VOR V ia 6-mile D M E 2500 T -d n ______300-1 300-1 200-34 Arc. C -d ...... 900-1 900-1 900-1}$ R l«n° FAR VOR Via 6-mile D M E 2500 C -n ...... 900-2 900-2 900-2 Arc. A -d n ______900-2 900-2 900-2 F A R V O R (final)...... - Direct______2500 Minimums with D M E : C -dn...... 500-1 600-1 500-1}$ S-dn-35*...... 600-1 500-1 600-1
Procedure turn E side of crs, 180° Outbnd, 360° Inbnd, 2500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2500'; over 6-mile D M E Fix, 1400. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 360°— 9.4 miles; 6-mile D M E Fix to airport, 360°—3.4 miles. „ , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 9.4 miles after passing F A R V O RT A C , climb to ¿ow on R 360° within 20 miles, or when directed by A T C , make left-climbing turn to intercept R 281°, climb to 2800 on R 281 within 20 miles. *500-54 authorized with operative A L S except for 4-engine turbojets. * M S A within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°-2400'; 090°-270°-2300'; 270°-360°—3200'. Citv Fargo- State, N . Dak.; Airport name, Hector; Elev., 900'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., F A R ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 1; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No; Orig.; Dated, 19 June 65
300-1 200-34 R 215°, F O D V O R clockwise—1_____ ■R 300° "POD VOR 2800 T -d n % ...... 300-1 Arc. C-dn#_...... 400-1 500-1 600-134 400-1 400-1 R 048°, F O R V O R counterclockwise R 300° FOT» VAR Via 6-mile D M E 2800 S-dn-12#$...... 400-1 Arc. A-dn#______800-2 800-2 800-2 6-mile D M E Fix, R 300°.______F O D V O R (final)...... Direct...... — 2800
Procedure turn W side of crs, 300° Outbnd, 2800' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2800'. . Crs and distance, facility to airport, 120°—5.5 miles...... ’ , , ,,, , _ _ .. , . oamv nn If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5.5 miles after passing F O D V O R , climb to a w ou R 120° within 15 miles, return to F O D V O R and hold m i R 300°. % W M n ^ e S ™ M s ^ e io w 7 ^ lfa h c ra ft departing southbound, flight below 2300' is prohibited between radials 120° and 175°, inclusive of the F O D V O R due to 1773' tower, 3.7 miles S of the airport. . , . „ , . ____ . . $400-% authorized with operative H I R L except for 4-engine turbojets. Reduction below % not authorized. #These minimums apply at all times for those air carriers with approved weather reporting services. ___. authorized Use Mason City, Iowa, altimeter setting when control zone not effective. Circling and straight-m ceiling mmimums are raised 100' and alternate minimums not autnonzeu when control zone not effective. . M S A within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2500'; 090°-180°—2800'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—2500'. City Fort Dodge; State, Iowa; Airport name, Fort Dodge Municipal; Elev., 1162'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., F O D ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 7; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 6; Dated, 19 Feb. 66
300-1 200-}$ Penguin Int______—. T.NTV R 99S0/MF’F R 162° 2000 T -d **...... 300-1 2000 C - d ...... 700-1 700-1 700-134 L N Y R 293°/MKK R 162° 800-2 800-2 Sdmpan In t i.______— 2000 A-d*„_- ...... 800-2 Rose I n t . .______LN Y VOR (final)...... Direct______2000
Procedure turn N side of crs, 278° Outbnd, 098° Inbnd, 2800' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 026°— 1.5 miles. - ; i ...... ______. . , , ___ „ „ „ t, t n innn' on L N Y If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums over the L N Y VO R or if landing not accomplished, make right turn, climD to wuu
R ^ otes^ G )2? ^ airport lighting. (2) Control zone operates 1430-1815 local standard time only. (3) Warning area 5 miles S of VO R . (4) Reductions not authorized. C a u t io n : Terrain rises sharply 2 miles N E of airport. Lee side turbulence may be encountered throughout approach. ♦Alternate minimums authorized only for air carriers with approved weather reporting service. , . ______«astbound “ Takeoffs Runway 3: Westbound V-2S, V-16, V-2, turn left, climb on crs; northwestbound on V-7, turn left to 300°, climb to 2500'prior to p o c ^ U n g ^ «» d on V-2, V-16, turn left, climb eastbound, S or R 096° to 3000' prior to joining airway. Runway 21: northwestbound to V-7, turn right to 300°, climb to 2500' prior w p i w » on crs; eastbound aircraft turn left, climb S of R 096° to 3000' prior to joining airway. M SA: 000°-090°—7800'; 090°-180°—3500'; 180°-270°—3300'; 270°-360°—5200'. M l ; City Lanai City; State, Hawaii; Airport name, Lanai; Elev., 1318'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R ; Ident., L N Y ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. N Dated, 2 May 64
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13121
V O R Standabd I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and 2-engine, T o — Altitude Condition From— distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots
T -d n ...... 600-1 500-1 NA C -dn ...... 800-1 800-1 i N A A -d n ______1000-2 1000-2 NA D M E Minimums: C -dn ...... 1 600-1 j 600-1 | N A
Procedure turn N side of crs, 065° Outbnd, 245° Inbnd, 2200' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2200'; at 6-mile D M E Fix, R 245°, 993'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 245°—8.2 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 8.2 miles after passing M H T VO R, make a right-climb ing turn to 2200' direct M H T V O R T A C . Hold N E of M H T V O R , 1-minute right turns, 246° Inbnd. Note: Use Manchester altimeter setting. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3000'; 090o-180°—2000'; 180°-270°—30007; 270°-360°—3500'. Citv, Nashua; State, N .H .; Airport name, Boire Field; Elev., 193'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R T A C ; Ident., M H T ; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 5 Dec. 64
PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 29 OCT. 1966. City,New Orleans; State, L a '; Airport name, N ew Orleans-Lakefront; Elev., 10'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R T A C ; Ident., H R V ; ProcedureNo. 3, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. date, 25 Dec. 65
AMP R Bn. _ . ___ ...... _____ ..... ______P IE V O R ...... Direct...... 1500 T-dn_...... 300-1 300-1 20O-J-4 C -dn ...... 700-1 700-1 700-1)4 S-dn-17*______700-1 700-1 700-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 If aircraft eauipped with operating D M E and 3-mile D M E Fix R 342° identified, the following mini- mums are authorized: C -d n ...;...... 600-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-17*...... 600-1 500-1 600-1
Radar available. Procedure turn W side of crs, 342° Outbnd, 162° Inbnd, 1500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 700'; if 3-mile D M E Fix R 342° identified, 500'. Crs and distance, breakoff point to Runway 17,170°—0.4 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile after passing P IE V O R , turn right, climb to 1600' on R 270° within 20 miles, or when directed by A T C , turn right, climb to 1600' on R 225° within 20 miles. Note: When authorized by A T C , P IE 10-mile D M E Orbit may be used from R 274° clockwise through R 039° at 1500' to position aircraft for a straight-in approach with the elimination of the procedure turn. * Reduction not authorized. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—1600'; 090°-180°—2200'; 180°-270°—1600'; 270°-360°—1600'. City, St. Petersburg-Clearwater; State, Fla.; Airport name, St. Petersburg-Clearwater International; Elev., 11'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., P IE ; Procedure No.' 1, Arndt. Orig; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66
SAT V O R ...... 2500 300-1 300-1 200-H McCoy In t... . 2000 C -dn . 500-1 600-1 500-1)4 Losoya Int____ ... 2300 S-dn-32#... 400-1 400-1 400-1 Elmendorf Int... 2300 800-2 800-2 800-2
Procedure turn E side of crs, 157° Outbnd, 337° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude' over facility on final approach Crs, 2000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 337°—4.5 miles. iwuio. visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing SSF V O R , turn right, heading **"' t* intercept and proceed On San Antonio V O R T A C , R 158° to Elmendorf Int, maintain 3000'. N ote: Night operation authorized Runways 14-32 Only. Control zone effective between 0700-2300 c.s.t. Caution: 2049' T V tower, 11 miles E S E of Stinson field. ; “tr,aight-in minimums not authorized unless position is established over the L V R , R 240° on final approach, MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—3100'; 090°-180°—2000'; 180°-270°—2100'; 270°-360°—2700'. pity, San Antonio; State, Tex.; Airport name, Stinson Municipal; Elev., 577'; Fac. Class., T -B V O R ; Ident., SSF; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 6; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 6; Dated, 13 Aug. 66
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13122 RULES AND REGULATIONS
3. By fl-mftnding the following terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures prescribed in § 97.13 to read: T e r m in a l VO R Standard I n s t r u m e n t A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radiate are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. , , ...... , „ . , . . , If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following Instrument approach procedure, iiniwM an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and altitude Condition 2-engine, From— T o— distance (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots
R 354°, F N T V O R ...... Via 10-mile 2600 T -d n ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% D M E Arc. C -dn______500-1 500-1 500-1% R 354°, F N T V O R 2600 S-dn-18...... 500-1 500-1 600-1 D M E Arc. A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 10-mlle D M E Fix, R 354° 3-mile D M E Fix (final)______Direct______1281 Minimum« with DME: C -d n ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1% S-dn-18______400-1 400-1 400-1
Procedure turn W side of ers, 354° Outbnd, 174° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over 3-mile D M E Fix on final approach ers, 1281'. Crs and distance, breakoff point to Runway 18,182°—0.32 mile...... , „ , , ' If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished withm 0 mile of F N T V O R , make climb mg turn right and proceed to F N LO M at 2100'. , M S A Within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°— 2200'; 090°-180°—2600'; 180°-270°—2200'; 270°-360°—2600'. City. Flint; State. Mich.; Airport name, Bishop; Elev., 781'; Fac. Class., L -B V O R T A C ; Ident., F N T ; ProcedureNo. Ter VOR-18, Arndt. 4; Eff. date, 29 Oct. <6; Sup. Amdt. No. 3; Dated, 24 Sept. 66
Direct____ I ______2000 T -dn_.r...... 300-1 300-1 200-% RaysideTnt. fORF T1MF., 11 milesi ORF, R 041°...... 2000 C -dn...... 700-1 700-1 700-1% ORF, R 041°...... 726 S-dn-22...... 700-1 700-1 700-1 3 miles. A -d n ______800-2 800-2 800-2 Minimums with 3-mile Radar or 3.6 D M E Fix: C -d n ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1% S-dn...... 500-1 500-1 600-1
Radar available. Procedure turn N side of crs, 041° Outbnd, 221° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over 3.6-mile D M E or 3-mile Radar Fix on final approach crs 726'. Crs and distance, 3-mile Radar Fix or 3.6-mile D M E Fix to airport, 221°—3 miles. Breakoff point to runway, 225°—0.6 mile. ,. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 0 mile of VO R, climb to 2500 o n O B F R 233 direct to Deep Creek Int. Hold SW, 1-minute left turns. . , . . • ...... , N ote: When authorized by A T C , D M E or Radar may be used within 10 miles at 2000' altitude to position aircraft for a straight-in approach with elimination of procedure turn. C a u t io n : 209' tower, 1.7 miles N of airport. M SA: 000°-090°—1300'; 090°-180°— 1200'; 180°-270°—2200'; 270°-360°— 1500'. City, Norfolk; State, Va.; Airport name, Norfolk Municipal; Elev., 26'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., O R F ; Procedure No. Ter VOR-22, An\dt. Orig.; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66 4. By amending the following very high frequency omnirange— distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures prescribed in § 97.15 to read: V O R / D M E Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are In nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. ■ ...... ___ . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be over specified routes. M inimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less More than Minimum Course and 2-engine, , altitude Condition From— T o - distance more than (feet) 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots
11-mile D M E Fix, R 120°...... Direct______... 2800 300-1 300-1 200-% F O D V O R ...... i ____ 500-1% R 048°, F O R V O R clockwise. R 120°, F O D V O R ...... Via 17-mile D M E 2800 400-1 600-1 400-1 400-1 400-1 800-2 800-2 ! ! l ii t i i I till I l I I I 1 l liti ILI I R 215°, F O D V O R counterclockwise. R 120°, F O D V O R ...... Via 17-mile D M E 2800 i t 1 1 800-2 Arc. 17-mile D M E Fix, R 120°______11-mile D M E Fix, R 120° (final)______Direct______2600
Procedure turn E side of crs, 120° Outbnd, 300° Inbnd, 2800' between 11- and 31-mile D M E Fix, R 120°. Minimum altitude over 11-mile D M E Fix, R 120° on final approach crs, 2600'. Crs and distance, 11-mile D M E Fix, R 120° to airport, 300°— 4.7 miles. „ „ r» w i» wnhin If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished at 6.3-mile D M E Fix R 120 , climb to 2800 on ä auu wi 10 miles, return to V O R and hold on R 300°. C a u t io n : Runways 18/36 unlighted...... 1 v r i' tnwer %When weather is below 700-1, aircraft departing southbound, flight below 2300' is prohibited between R 120*^ and R 176 inclusive of the F O D V O R due to u ia 1 3.7 miles S of the airport. $400-% authorized with operative H I R L except for 4-engine turbojet. Reduction below % not authorized. #These minimums apply at all times for those air carriers with approved weather reporting services. . b„thnrlzed Use Mason City, Iowa, altimeter setting when control zone not effective. Circling and straight-in ceiling minimums are raised 200 and alternate minimums noi auu when control zone not effective. M SA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2500'; 090°-180°—2800'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—2500'. City, Fort Dodge; State, Iowa; Airport name, Fort Dodge Municipal; Elev., 1162'; Fac. Class., H -B V O R T A C ; Ident., F O D ; Procedure No. V O R DM E-l,.Am dt. 3, Eff. a e> 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 19 Feb. 66 ______.
PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 29 OCT. 1966. City, Norfolk; State, Va.; Airport name, Norfolk Municipal; Elev., 26'; Fac. Class., B V O R T A C ; Ident., O R F ; Procedure No. V O R /D M E No. 1, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 1 u 64; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 11 Apr. 64 ______.
PROCEDURE CANCELED, EFFECTIVE 29 OCT. 1966. . City, St. Petersburg-Clearwater; State, Fla.; Airport name, St. Petersburg-Clearwater International; Elev., 11'; Fac. Class, B V O R T A C ; Ident., P IE ; Procedure No. D M E No. 1, Amdt. 2; Eff. date, 26 Mar. 66; Sup. Amdt. N o. 1; Dated, 14 Aug. 65
FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13123
5, By amending the following instrument landing system procedures prescribed in § 97.17 to read: ILS Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall «»respond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.
Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums
2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum T o -- 2-engine, From— distance altitude Condition (feet) 65 knots More than more than or less 65 knots 65 knots
AP E V O R ...... C B L O M ...... 2500 T-dn% . 300-1 300-1 200-54 C B L O M ...... 2500 c m n 500-1 500-1 500-154 OM T.OM ______C B L O M ...... 2500 S-dn-*10L# 200-*4 200-54 ZOO-1/ C É L O M ...... 2500 600-2 600-2 600-2
Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 276° Outbnd, 096° Inbnd, 2500' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2500'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2495'— 5.8 miles; at MM, 1028'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minim urns or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2700' and proceed direct to the CM L O M , hold E, 1-minute right turns, 276° Inbnd. % R V R 2400': Authorized Runway 10L. > #RVR 2400': Descent below 1016' not authorized unless approach lights are visible. *500-5* (R V R 4000') required with glide slope inoperative. 500-54 (R V R 2400') authorized with operative A L S except for 4-engine turbojets. City, Columbus; State, Ohio; Airport name, Port Columbus International; Elev., 816'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., I -C B P ; Procedure No. ILS-10L, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 7 Aug. 65
10-mile D M E Fix, R 152°...... LOM...... 3200 T-dn 300-1 300-1 200-14 E U G VOR ...... - . ______L O M ...... 2100 C-dn 600-1 600-1 600-1)4 *12-mile DM E Fix and N crs E U G localizer. LOM -(final)...... I ...... 1500 S-dn-16## 200-54 200-54 200-14 10-mile DM E Fix, R 167°...... L O M ...... 3000 600-2 600-2 600-2 10-mile DM E Fix, R 204°______LOM ...... 3000 CVO VOR via CVO VOR R 135° and N LOM (final)____ .... ______2200 crs E U G localizer. ;
Vrocedm e turn E side of crs, 339° Outbnd, 159° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles. N ot authorized beyond 10 miles. (Final approach from holding pattern at E U L O M not authorized, procedure turn required.) Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1500'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at LO M , 1499'—3.7 miles; at LM M , 570'—0.6 mile. ; If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished turn right and climb to 2100' on N crs, Eugene IL S loca lizer within 10 miles of LO M , or when directed by A T C , turn right and climb to 3000' on R 250° E U G V O R within 10 miles of E U G V O R Cautio n: High terrain & and W. N ote: When authorized by A T C , D M E may be used between R 326° E U G V O R clockwise to R 010° E U G V O R within 12 miles at 2300' to position aircraft for straight-in approach with elimination of the procedure turn. #RVR 2400': Authorized Runway 16. ##RVR 2400': Descent below 565r not authorized unless approach lights are visible. •Glide slope altitude at 12-mile D M E Fix' 3700'. % Takeoffs all runways: Clim b on the Eugene V O R T A C R 355° within 10 miles to cross the V O R T A C , southbound V-23,900'; westbound R 251°, 1000'j
City, Eugene; State, Oreg.; Airport name, Mahlon Sweet Field; Elev., 365';Fac. Class., ILS ; Ident., I- E U G ; Procedure No. ILS-16, Amdt. 19; Efl. date. 29 Oct. 66: Su d Amdt. No. 18; Dated, 16 July 66
Holland Int...... LOM...... T-dn**. 300-1 300-1 E W VO R 200-J4 LOM ...... C -dn __ 600-1 600-1 600-1*4 Princeton Int.. . LOM ...... S-dn-21 300-5* 300-5* 300-5* Mount Vernon In t.. LOM ...... A-dn.__ 600-2 600-2 600-2 Augusta Int___ _ Buckskin Int______New Haven Int. . . LOM...... Holland In t.. RAM, R 112° Buckskin Int.. LOM (final).... Booneville Int.. LOM...... 2100 Phillipstown Tnt LOM...... 2100 CWBVOR LOM...... 2100 Mackey Int__ LOM ...... Cairo Int___ _ LOM...... 2400
Procedure turn N side of crs, 035° Outbnd, 215° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles. « M m altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2100'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2033—6 miles; at M M 586—0.5 mile anrinrllS^1 *co fo t established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make left-climbing turn, climb to 2100' on 180° crs to R 080°. X ° R °L^,he„n.dlr?,cte^ i y AT e >make climbing right turn, climb to 2100' on 305° crs until intercepting R 013°, then proceed N on R 013° to Princeton Int, ^ aution. Radio tower 993', 3.6 miles SW of airport. Back crs unusable. **§™1,re City, Evansville; State, Ind.; Airport name, Dress Memorial; Elev., 389'; Fac. Class., ILS ; Ident., I-E V V ; Procedure No. ILS-21, Amdt. 10: Ell. date, 29 Oct. 66- Sud.’ Am dt. No. 9; Dated, 13 Oct. 62 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 3T, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13124 RULES AND REGULATIONS IL S Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure— Continued Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Minimum Course and 2-engine, From— To— altitude Condition more than distance More than (feet) 65 knots 65 knots or less 65 knots SD L O M ...... Direct...... 2100 T -d n i...... 300-1 300-1 200-Vi SD L O M ...... Direct______2500 C -dn ...... 600-1 600-1 600-lVi SD L O M ...... - ...... Direct______2300 S-dn-l*d...... 200-Vi 200-Vi 200 SD L O M ...... Direct______2300 A -d n ______600-2 600-2 600-2 SD L O M ...... Direct______2300 SD L O M ...... Direct______3000 SD L O M ...... Direct______2600 Procedure tarn6W side of final approach crs, 190° Outbnd, 010“ Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles of SD R B n (L O M ). Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2100'. , „ _ .. Altitude of elide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1870—4.8 miles, at MM, 665—0.5 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make a left-climbmg turn to 2500' on heading 270 , intercept R 283” L O U V O R and proceed to Corydon Int. Hold W 1-minute right turns, 103“ Inbnd. T , , - Alternate missed approach: Climb to 2200'on N crs of IL S to Harbor Int. Hold N , 1-minute left turns, 190 Inbnd. , , _ ntna , r . ... N ote: When authorized by A T C .D M E may be used to position aircraft on final approach crs at 2500' via an 11-mile D M E Arc, R 036 clockwise to R 240 from Louisville V O R T A C with the elimination of the procedure turn. *400-41 (R V R 4000') required when glide slope not utilized. 400-VS (R V R 2400') authorized with operative A L S , except for 4-engine turbojets. ¿ R V R 2000' authorized for 4-engine turbojets. R V R 1800' authorized for all other aircraft. Descent below 697' not authorized unless approach lights visible. City Louisville: State, K y.; Airport name, Standiford Field; Elev., 497'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Iden t.,I-S D F ; Procedure No. ILS-1, Arndt. 25; Eff. date, 29 Oct. f Sup. Arndt. " No. 24; Dated 9 July 66 L O M ...... 1...... Direct...... 2000 T -d n *...... 300-1 300-1 200-Va C -d n ...... 500-1 500-1 500-1V6 S-dn-9*#...... 200-Vi 200-Vi 200-Vis A - d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 Prwedure ^turrfs side of crs, 265“ Outbnd, 085“ Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1800'...... Altitude of elide sloDe and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1800'— 5.9 miles; at MM, 215— 0.6 mile. ,, . . . . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 700 oners, 085 within 5 miles, then make right climbing turn to 2000' and proceed direct to Woodstown V O R . Hold SW, R 211”, 031" Inbnd, 1-minute left turns. *R V R °M 0^*A u th orizeiR u n w ay O °I)escentCbelow 214^noUuithorized imless approach lights are visible. TtVR 2400': Applies when 200' runway light spacing in use. #500-1 required with glide slope inoperative. Citv Philadelphia- State, Pa.; Airport name, Philadelphia International; Elev., 14'; Fac. Class., ILS ; Ident., I-P H L ; Procedure No. ILS-9, Arndt. 18; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No. 17; Dated, 15 June 63 300-1 300-1 200-Vi Woodstown V O R . T,OM ______Direct______1600 T -d n **...... C -d n ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1Vi S-dn-1#*...... 200-Vâ 200-Vis 200-Vi A -d n ...... 600-2 600-2 600-2 Procedure turn W side S crs, 194° Outbnd, 014° Inbnd, 1600' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1600'...... - 0 Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1631 — 5.3 miles; at MM, 293 —0.6 mile. - . OAn., „ wrr „ „„o witfmt If visual contact notestablished upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make climbing left turn to 2000 on E W T R 270 to Elkton Int. Hold W, 1-minute right turns, 090° Inbnd. •...... T Caution: Turn left as soon as practical to avoid holdmg pattern at Philadelphia LOM . **R V R 2400': Authorized Runway 1...... #R V R 2400': Descent below 279' not authorized unless approach lights are visible. *300-% required with glide slope inoperative. City, Wilmington; State, Del.; Airport name, Greater Wilmington; Elev., 79'; Fac. Class., IL S ; Ident., I - I L G ; Procedure No. ILS-1, Arndt. 9; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66, Sup. ' Arndt. No. 8; Dated, 8 Aug. 64 300-1 200-VS Millbury Int.. OR T,OM 2400 T-dn#.______300-1 2400 C -dn ...... 600-1 600-1 600-1Vi Putnam V O R 200-H 200-Vi Sutton Int___ OR TsOM (final) 2400 S-dn-33*...... 20O-V6 800-2 800-2 800-2 Boston V O R . Direct...... 3000 A -d n ...... Without glide slope: S-dn-33*...... 300-M 300-Jij 300-Vi Procedure turn E side of crs, 152° Outbnd, 332° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2400'. ___ Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2343 —4 miles; at MM, 1226 —0.6 mile. n i) . a u If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 3.4 miles after passing O K LOM , or at the LMM, make an immediate left-climbing turn to 2400' direct to O R LO M . Hold SE of O R LO M , 332° Inbnd, 1-minute right turns. N otes: (1) Glide slope unusable below 1209'. (2) Back crs unusable. Caution: 1663' radio tower, 1.9 miles N N W of airport; 1180' lighted obstruction, 0.7 mile W of approach end Runway 11. “Missed approach point is the LM M . 400-1 required when LM M is inoperative. #300-1 required for takeoffs on Runway 29. .... „ . . ,. .,. ,, proceeding northeast- Departure Procedures: Departure Runway 33—Execute left-climbing turn as soon as practicable after takeoff to 300° heading climbing to 2000 before bound. Departure Runway 2—Climb to 2000' on a magnetic heading of 050° before making a left turn. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. City. Worcester; State, Mass; Airport name, Worcester Municipal; Elev., 1009'; Fac. Class., ILS ; Ident., I-O R H ; Procedure No. ILS-33, Arndt. 10; Eff. Arndt. No. 9; Dated, 9 July 66 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13125 6, By amending the following radar procedures prescribed in § 97.19 to read: R adab Standard I nstrum ent A pproach P rocedure Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet, M S L . Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Agency. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes; Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be estab- lished with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final authorized landing minimums, the instructions of the radsur controller are mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the authorized landing minimums, or (B ) at pilot’s, discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach, except when the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A ) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B ) directed b y radar controller ; (G) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D ) if landing is not accomplished. Transition Gelling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less Minimum More than Course and To— altitude Condition 2-engine, From— distance (feet) more than- 65 knots More than 65 knots or less 65 knots ■ 1 . 1 Within: Surveillance approach 250° 350°...... - ...... - ...... 30 miles______2600 T -d n — ...... 300-1 300-1 200-% 350° 030°...... 30 m iles...... 2400 C -dn ‘ ...... 400-1 500-1 500-1 030° 2 1 5 °...... 2500 C-dn-27 700-1 700-1 700-1% 215°. 250°...... _...... 30 miles...... 2400 S-dn*#._...... 400-1 400-1 400^1 000° 360°..___ ...... 2000 S-dn-27______700-1 700-1 700-1 A -d n ...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 and including the area 4 miles E and 7 miles W of Runways 18-36 centerline extended 16 miles to the N ; and the area 4 miles W and 7 miles E of Runways 18-36 centerline extended 16 miles tothe S, minimum altitude 2000'. . Radar terminal area transition altitudes—all bearings are from the radar site with sector azimuths progressing clockwise. Radar control will provide 1000' vertical clearance within a 3-mile radius of towers, 1746' and 1411', 9 miles E N E ; 1550', 24 miles N E ; 1260', 2.5 miles E; 1130', 9 miles E; 1120', 12 miles N W and water tank 1083', 4 miles SSE. Tower 1167', 14 miles N N E . If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, Runway 36: Climb to 2500' and proceed to N ew Baltimore Int. Hold N 1-minute right turns, 186° Inbnd. Runways 9,18, and 27; Climb to 2000' and proceed S to Union Int. Hold S 1-minute right turns, 360' inbnd. ‘ Runways 9,18, 36. #400-% authorized for Runways 18 and 36 with operative high-intensity runway lights, except for ■^engine turbojet aircraft. #400-% authorized for Runways 18 and 36 with operative A L S , except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft. City, Covington; State, Ky.; Airport name, Greater Cincinnati; Elev., 890'; Fac. Class, and Ident., Cincinnati Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. 7; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup; Arndt. No. 6; Dated 2 July 66 § ■ . ■ . 000°...... 360°...... , 1900 Surveillance approach 000° . fM H U M 360°...______• ,...... 7-15 miles...... 2300 T.-dn. 300-1 300-1 200-% 000°...... 360°...... 2800 C -dn. 600-1 % 600-1% 600-1% A -d n . 800-2 800-2 800-2 If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, Runway 23L: Climb to 2400', proceed to Y I P LO M . Runway 6R, make left turn, climb to 2600' and proceed to SVM V O R on SVM R 170°.' N ote; Radar control will provide 1000' vertical clearance with a 3-mile radius of 1311' tower, 7 miles SE, four towers, 1700' to 1753', 15 miles N E . City, Detroit; State, Mich.; Airport name, Willow Run; Elev., 716'; Fac. Class., and Ident., Detroit Metro Radar; Procedure No. 1, Arndt. Orig.; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66 Within: Surveillance approach 045°___ 295°... 2000 T -d n “ . 300-1 300-1 200-% 295°...... 330°...... 2200 C-dn*_. 500-1 600-1 600-1% 330°... 045°...... 2400 S-dn#*.. 500-1 500-1 500-1 395°____ ■ ■ ’J :■ V : ■ , 080°...... 1800 A -d n ___ 800-2 800-2 800-2 080°...... 295°...... 1500 Precision approach S-dn-9“ _ 200-% 200-% 200-% A-dn-9__ 600-2 600-2 600-2 If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, climb to 2000' and proceed direct to Woodstown V O R . Hold BW, R 211°, 031° Inbnd, 1-minute left turns. #Runways 9,17, 27, 35. ‘ Runway 27 only descent below 700' not authorized until passing 5-mile Radar Fix. “ R V R 2000': Authorized Runway 9. Descent below 214' not authorized unless approach lights are visible. R V R 2400': Applies when 200' runway lights spacing in use. City, Philadelphia; State, Pa.; Airport name, Philadelphia international; Elev., 14'; Fac. Class, and Ident., Philadelphia Radar; Procedure No. 1,-Arndt. 10; Eff. date, 29 Oct. 66; Sup. Arndt. No, 9; Dated, 12 Mar. 66 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. (Secs. 307(c), 313(a), ¿01, Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775)) Issued in Washington, D.C., on September 21, 1966. W . E. R ogers, Acting Director, Flight Standards Service. [F.R. Doc. 66-10635; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 8:45 a tri.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 No. 197- 13126 RULES AND REGULATIONS student shall be considered a full-time or subdivision of the State. This ap Title 20— EMPLOYEES’ student if he is paid by his employer for proval may be indirect, as, for example, attending an educational institution at if attendance at the school satisfies the his employer’s request or pursuant to a State’s compulsory education laws, or BENEFITS requirement of his employer. ' if the school has a tax exemption as a Chapter III— Social Security Admin (2) Full-time attendance. Ordinarily, school, or if the school receives financial istration, Department of Health, a student is in “full-time attendance” at aid, loans, or scholarship allowances; Education, and Welfare , an educational institution if he is en or rolled in a noncorrespondence course and (iii) In the case of a nonaccredited - [Regs. No. 4, further amended] isvcarrying a subject load which is con school, college, or university, its credits PART 404— FEDERAL OLD-AGE, SUR sidered full-time for day students under are accepted, on transfer, by not less than VIVORS, AND DISABILITY INSUR the institution’s standards and practices. three institutions which have been However, a student will not be considered accredited by a State-recognized or na ANCE (1950______) in “full-time attendance” (i) if he is en tionally recognized accrediting agency or Subpart D— Old-Age, Disability, De rolled in a junior college, college, or uni body, for credit on the same basis as pendents' and Survivors’ Insurance versity in a course of study of less than if transferred from an institution so 13 school weeks’ duration, or, (ii) if he accredited. Acceptance of credits on Benefits; Period of Disability is enrolled in any other educational insti transfer includes, in addition to accept Subpart L— Family Relationships tution and either the course of study is ance of laterally transferred credits be less than 13 school weeks’ duration or tween similar educational institutions, M iscellaneous A m e n d m e n t s his scheduled attendance is at the rate of acceptance of credits completed in an Regulations No. 4 of the Social Security less than 20 hours a week. A student institution at a lower grade level for Administration, as amended (20 CFR whose full-time attendance begins or entrance into an institution at a higher 404.1 et seq.), are further amended as ends in a month is in full-time attend grade level. ance for that month. follows: 2. Section 404.321 is amended to read (3) Deemed full-time student during 1. Section 404.320 is amended to read as follows: as follows: period of nonattendance. An individual will be deemed a full-time student during § 404.321 Child's insurance benefits; § 404.320 Child's insurance benefits; any period of nonattendance (including duration of entitlement. conditions of entitlement. part-time attendance) at an educational (a) A child is entitled to a child’s in (a) Entitlement. A child is entitled to institution if the period is 4 consecutive surance benefit for each month begin a child’s insurance benefit if.he or she: c a le n d a r months or less, and the ning with the first month in which all (1) Is the child (as defined inindividual: of the conditions of entitlement described § 404.1105) of: (i) Establishes that he intends to be in in § 404.320 (a) or (b) are met. How (1) An individual entitled to old-age full-time attendance at an educational ever, no entitlement to child’s benefits Insurance benefits or disability insurance institution in the month immediately fol may be established for any month: benefits; or lowing such period, or (1) Before January 1957 if the child’s (ii) An individual who was fully in (ii) Is in full-time attendance at an entitlement is based on his disability as sured (see §§404.108-404.113) or cur educational institution in the month im defined in section 223(c) (2) of the Act rently insured (see § 404.114) at the time mediately following such period. as in effect prior to September 1965, or of death; and However, an individual will not be before September 1965 if entitlement is (2) Has filed application, except as deemed a full-time student during any based on his disability as defined in sec provided in § 404.353(d), for child’s in period of nonattendance if the non- tion 223(c)(2) of the Act, as amended surance benefits; and attendance is due to expulsion or sus by section 303(a)(2) of P.L. 89-97, en (3) Is unmarried at the time such ap pension, notwithstanding such individual acted on July 30, 1965; plication is filed; and intends to, or does ip fact, resume full (2) Before September 1958, if benefits (4) At the time such application is time attendance within 4 calendar are based on the earnings of a parent filed: months after the beginning of such pe entitled to disability insurance benefits; (i) Has not attained the age of 18, riod of nonattendance. (3) Before October 1960, if the parent or (4) Educational institution. An edu on whose earnings record the benefits are (ii) Has not attained the age of 22 cational institution, as used in this para claimed died before 1940; and is a full-time student (as defined graph (c ), is a school (including a tech (4) Before January 1965, * if child’s in paragraph (c) of this section), or nical, trade, or vocational school), entitlement is based on his status as a (iii) Is under a disability which began junior college, college, or university full-time student (see § 404.320(a) (4) before attainment of age 18; and which meets any of the conditions de (ii) ) ; (5) W as dependent (see §§404.324- scribed in the following subdivisions ( i ) , (5) Before September 1965, if child s 404.327) at a time specified in § 404.323, (ii), and (iii) of this subparagraph (4): entitlement is based on his status as de upon the parent on whose earnings (i) It is operated or directly supported scribed in § 404.1101(d); . child’s insurance benefits are claimed. by the United States, or by any State or (6) Before the month of the child s (b) Reentitlement. A child whose en local government or political subdivision birth. titlement to benefits terminated with the thereof; or (b) The last month for which a child is month before the month in which he at (ii) It is approved by a State or accred entitled to a child’s insurance benefit is tained age 18, or later, may thereafter ited by a State-recognized or nationally the month before the month in which any (provided no event specified in paragraph recognized accrediting agency or body. one of the following events first occurs: (b) (2) and (3) of § 404.321 has oc A nationally recognized accrediting (1) The child dies; curred) again become entitled to such agency or body is an agency or body that (2) The child is adopted, except for benefits upon filing application for such has been determined to be such by the adoption after the death of the indi reentitlement, beginning with the first U.S. Commissioner of Education. A vidual on whose earnings such entitle month after such termination in which State-recognized accrediting agency or ment is based, by: he is a full-time student and has not body is an agency or body designated (i) The child’s stepparent, grandpar attained the age of 22. or recognized by a State as proper au ent, aunt, or uncle, and (c) Definitions of terms— (1) Full- thority for accrediting schools, colleges, (ii) Effective after July 1965, tne time student. The term “full-time stu or universities as meeting educational child’s brother or sister (where a child s dent” means a student who is in full standards. Approval by a State includes benefits were terminated by such adop time attendance (as defined in subpar. approval of a school, college, or univer tion prior to August 1965, such child may. (2) of this paragraph) at an educational sity as an educational institution, or of based upon application filed after June institution (as defined in subparagraph one or more of the school’s, college’s, 1965, become reentitled to benefits if an (4) of this paragraph), except that no or university’s courses, by a State agency other requirements are met). FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13127 (3) The child marries (except as pro ent is entitled to disability insurance (ii) W as legally adopted by such par vided in paragraph (d) of this section); benefits, dependency of the child may ent before the end of the 24-month pe (4) The child attains age 18, and not be established at the time specified riod beginning with the month after (i) Is not under a disability at thatin subparagraph (1) of this paragraph the month in which such parent became time, and unless such child: entitled to old-age insurance benefits (1) In the case of an insured indiwhose wages and self-employment in T erpene R esin s vidual who is entitled to old-age insur come his application is based but has the Synthetic resin_ Consisting of polymers of ance benefits and in tile month bef ore he status of a child of such individual un a-pinene, fi-pinene, and/ became entitled to such benefits was not der applicable State law as described or dipentene; acid value entitled to disability insurance benefits: in § 404.1101 (a) and (b) (1), or is deemed less than 5, saponifica (1) Such insured individual has ac to have the status of child of such indi tion number less than 5, knowledged in writing that the claimant vidual pursuant to § 404.1101 (c) or (d) . and color less than 4 on is his son or daughter, or he has been the G a r d n e r scale as (Secs. 202, 205, 1102, 72 Stat. 1022, as amend measured in 50 percent decreed by a court to be the father of ed, 53 Stat. 1362, as amended, 53 Stat. 647; sec. mineral spirit solution. the claimant, or he has been ordered 5, Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1953, 67 Stat. * * * * * by a court to contribute to the support 18, 631; 42 U.S.C. 402, 405, 1302) of the claimant because claimant is his Any person who will be adversely af Dated: September 21, 1966. son or daughter, and such acknowledg fected by the foregoing order may at any ment, court decree, or court order was [ s e a l ] ' R obert M . B a l l , time within 30 days from the date of its made not less than 1 year before such Commissioner of Social Security. publication in the F ederal R egister file with the Hearing Clerk, Department of insured individual became entitled to Approved: October 4, 1966. old-age insurance benefits or attained Health, Education, and Welfare, Room age 65, whichever is earlier, or W il b u r J. C o h e n , 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., (ii) Such insured individual is shown Acting Secretary of Health, Washington, D.C. 20201, written objec by satisfactory evidence to be the father Education, and Welfare. tions thereto, preferably in quintuplicate. of the claimant and was living with or [F.R. f>oc. 66-11044; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; Objections shall show wherein the contributing to the support of the claim 8:48 a.m.] person filing will be adversely affected ant at the time such insured individual by the order and specify with par became entitled to old-age insurance ticularity the provisions of the order benefits or attained age 65, whichever deemed objectionable and the grounds first occurred; Title 21— FOOD AND DR06S for the objections. If a hearing is requested, the objections must state (2) In the case of an insured individ Chapter I— Food and Drug Adminis ual who is entitled to disability insurance the issues for the hearing. A hearing benefits or who was entitled to such bene tration, Department of Health, Edu will be granted if the objections are sup fits in the month before the first month cation, and Welfare ported by grounds legally sufficient to justify the relief sought. Objections for which he was entitled to old-age SUBCHAPTER B— FOOD AND FOOD PRODUCTS insurance benefits: may be accompanied by a memorandum (i) Such insured individual has ac PART 121— FOOD ADDITIVES or brief in support thereof. knowledged in writing that the claimant Subpart D— Food Additives Permitted Effective date. This order shall be is his son or daughter, or he has been in Food for Human Consumption come effective on the date of its publica decreed by a court to be the father of the tion in the F ederal R e g ist e r . claimant, or he has been ordered by a S y n t h e t ic T e r p e n e R e s in s for C h e w i n g (Sec. 409 (c )(1 ), (d ), 72 Stat. 1786, 1787; court to contribute to the support of the C u m B ase 21 U.S.C. 348 (c )(1 ), ( d )) claimant because the claimant was his son or daughter, and such acknowledg No adverse comments were received in Dated: October 3, 1966. ment, court decree, or court order was response to the notice published in the J. K . K ir k , F ederal R e g ister of July 28, 1966 (31 made before such insured individual’s Associate Commissioner F.R. 10198), proposing that (1) the poly most recent period of disability began, or for Compliance. (ii) Such insured individual is shown mer composition of synthetic terpene by satisfactory evidence to be the father resins for use in chewing gum base as [F.R. Doc. 66-11043; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; of the claimant and was living with or prescribed in § 121.1059(a) be broadened 8:48 a.m.] contributing to the support of the claim to include polymers of a-pinene and ant at the time such period of disability dipentene and (2) that the regulation be began; amended to prescribe specifications for (3) In the case of a deceased insured such synthetic terpene resins^ (Pro Title 23— HIGHWAYS AND individual: posal (1) was based on a petition (FAP (1) Such insured individual had ac6A1819) filed by Tenneco Chemicals, VEHICLES knowledged in writing that the claimant Inc., Newport Division, Post Office Chapter II— Vehicle and Highway Drawer 911, Pensacola, Fla. 32502, and is his son or daughter, or he had been Safety decreed by a court to be the father of the proposal (2) was on the initiative of the claimant, or he had been ordered by a Commissioner of Food and Drugs.) Ac SUBCHAPTER B— PROCEDURAL RULES court to contribute to the support of the cordingly, it is concluded that the pro [Docket No. 1] claimant because the claimant was his posed amendment should be adopted PART 215— RULE MAKING; INITIAL son or daughter, and such acknowledg without change. SAFETY STANDARDS ment, court decree, or court order was Therefore, pursuant to the provisions made before the death of such insured of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic N ote: The heading of Title 23 of the Code Individual, or of Federal Regulations is revised to read as Act (sec. 409 (c) (1), (d), 72 Stat. 1786, (ii) Such insured individual is shown set forth above. by satisfactory evidence to have been the 1787; 21 U.S.C. 348 (c)(1), (d)), and This rule-making action adds Chapter father of the claimant and that he was under the authority delegated to the II to Title 23 of the Code of Federal living with or contributing to the sup Commissioner by the Secretary of Health, Regulations. Chapter n will eventually port of the claimant at the time he died. Education, and Welfare (21 CFR 2.120; contain all the regulations pertaining to 31 F.R. 3008), § 121.1059(a) is amended Motor Vehicle and Highway Safety. At 6. Section 404.1109(c) is amended to this time only the procedural rules gov read as follows: by changing the item “Synthetic resin” erning promulgation of initial Federal § 404.1109 Definition of child. listed under “Terpene Resins” to read as motor vehicle safety standards under follows: The term “child” means a claimant section 103 of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 are who: § 121.1059 Chewing gum base. being issued. ♦ * ♦ * * * * * * * These rules will constitute Part 215 of (c) Is neither the stepchild nor legally (a) • * * Title 23 CFR. They are made effective adopted child of the individual upon • • • • • upon publication. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13129 These rules are drafted to help ensure ested person shall submit as part of his the initial motor vehicle safety stand written comments all the evidence that Title 33— NAVIGATION AND ards are issued on or before January 31, he Considers material to any statement 1967. This time schedule will neces of fact made by him. In the comments, NAVIGABLE WATERS sitate strict adherence to procedural statements of fact, supporting evidence, dates established under these rules. This contentions as to policy, and legal argu Chapter II— Corps of Engineers, part m ay be amended in light of com ments shall be separated to the extent Department of the Army ments or on the Secretary’s own possible. Incorporation of material by initiative. reference should be avoided. However, PART 202— ANCHORAGE Procedural rules to govern adoption of if necessary, the incorporated material REGULATIONS the revised Federal Motor Vehicle Stand should be identified with respect to docu PART 204— DANGER ZONE ards will be issued ment and page. After the notice is separately at a later REGULATIONS date. issued and before issuance of the order, Subchapter A of Chapter II is reserved, communications to the Secretary or his Hudson River, N.Y.; Straits of Florida and Parts 211-213 of Subchapter B of staff concerning the Initial Standards and Florida Bay, Fla. Chapter II are reserved. shall be in writing unless specific ar In consideration of the foregoing, rangements are made for a meeting at 1. Pursuant to the provisions of sec Title 23 of the Code of Federal Regula which a transcript or summary minutes tion 1 of an Act of Congress approved tions is hereby amended, effective on shall be taken. April 22, 1940 (54 Stat. 150; 33 U.S.C. publication, by the addition of Chapter 180), § 202.60 is hereby amended with § 215.13 Docket. IT, consisting of Part 215 at present, to respect to paragraph (p) redesignating read as follows: A public docket relating to this pro the boundaries of a special anchorage ceeding will be maintained at the Office area in the Hudson River at Hastings- Sec. ' ' of the General Counsel of the Depart on-Hudson, N.Y., wherein vessels not 215.1 Scope. 215.3 Definitions. ment of Commerce. Any interested per more than 65 feet in length, when at an 215.5-215.9 [Reserved] son may examine and copy any docu chor, shall not be required to carry or 215.11 Notice of rule-making. ment in the docket during regular busi exhibit anchor lights, effective 30 days 215.13 Docket. ness hours. The docket will contain the after publication in the F ed eral R e g is 215.15 Order. record in this proceeding (except for t e r , as follows: 215.17 Reconsideration. copies of published materials that are § 202.60 Port o f New York and vicinity. readily available to the public); and cor Au th o r ity: The provisions of this Part 215 * * * * * issued under secs. 103, 119, National Traffic respondence and other public documents and M otor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, 80 Stat. relating to this proceeding. (p’) Hudson River, at Hastings-on- 718. Hudson. That portion of the waters § 215.15 Order. northerly of a line extending from a § 215.1 Scope. The Secretary will make an order is point at latitude 40°59'56.0", longitude This part prescribes the procedures suing initial motor vehicle safety stand 73°53'11.3" to the shore at latitude that will govern the rule-making pro ards. This order will be published in the 40°59'55.7"; easterly of liries extending ceedings for adoption and amendment of rules section of the F ederal R e g ist e r . from the aforementioned point at lati the Initial Federal Motor Vehicle Safety The order will be based exclusively on tude 40°59'56.0", longitude 73°53'11.3" Standards under section 103 of the the record. through a point at latitude 41°00'04.6", National Traffic and Motor Vehicle § 215.17 Reconsideration. longitude 73”53'10.9" to a point at lati Safety Act of 1966. tude 41°00'14.6", longitude 73°53'08.2"; Any person who will be adversely af and southerly of a line extending from § 215.3 Definitions. fected by an order issued under § 215.15 the last mentioned point to the shore at “Act” means the National Traffic and may, within ten (10) days after publica latitude 41°00'14.2". Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, P.L. tion of the order in the F ederal R eg ister , * * * * * 89-563, of September 9, 1966, 80 Stat. file a Petition for Reconsideration of the [Regs., Sept. 26, 1966,1507-32 (Hudson River, 718. order. The Petition shall be filed in N.Y.) —ENGCW-ON] (Sec. 1, 54 Stat. 150; 33 “Initial standard” means a standard twenty (20) legible copies and shall con U.S.C. 180) tain a concise statement of Petitioner’s adopted under section 103(h), first sen 2. Pursuant to the provisions of section tence, of the Act. contentions' and underlying matters of 7 of the River and Harbor Act of August fact, law or policy. Matters of fact not “Secretary” means the Secretary of 8,1917 (40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) § 204.95 already in the record and introduced in Commerce or a person to whom he has establishing and governing the use and the Petition will be considered only if delegated final authority in the matter navigation of danger zones in the Straits accompanied by a showing that there concerned by published delegation. of Florida and Florida Bay, Fla.; is “Standard” means a Federal motor were reasonable grounds for failure to hereby amended with respect to sub- vehicle safety standard established under adduce them before the end of the period paragraph (a) (2), revoking one of the sections 102(2) and 103 of the Act. for comments on the notice of rule-mak danger zones in subdivision (iii),' effec §§215.5—215.9 [Reserved] ing. The Secretary may direct a stay of tive 30 days after publication in the F ed eral R e g is t e r as follows: § 215,11 Notice o f rule-making. any provisions of the order objected to in the Petition pending disposition of the § 204.95 Straits o f Florida and Florida Tlie Secretary will issue a notice of Petition. After such proceedings, if any, Bay in vicinity o f Key West, F la.; op rule-making that will be published in erational training area, aerial gun as the Secretary may direct, he will the Federal R egister in conformity with nery range, and bombing and strafing section 4(a) of the Administrative Pro- dispose of the Petition by an appropriate target areas, Naval Air Station, Key cedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 1003, proposing the Order on Reconsideration. West, Fla. initial Federal motor vehicle safety Issued in Washington, D.C., on Oc (a) The danger zones. * * * standards. The notice will establish the tober 6,1966. (2) * * * period within which written comments (iii) A circular area located west of containing data, views and arguments J o h n T. C o n n o r , Marquesas Keys with a radius of two must actually be received. Such writ Secretary of Commerce. nautical miles having its center at lati ten comments shall be submitted in [F.R. Doc. 66—11029: Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; tude 24°34'30" and longitude 82°14'00"; wenty (20) legible copies. Any .inter 8:49 a.m.] * * * * * FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13130 RULES AND REGULATIONS [Regs., Sept. 26, 1966, 1507-32 (Straits of (6) The use of air-thrust boats on the (6) All guns must be unloaded and Florida and Florida Bay, Fla.) -ENGCW-ON] refuge is prohibited. cased while hunters are traveling to and (Sec. 7, 40 Stat. 266; 33 U.S.C. 1) (7) Hunters under 16 years of age may from the hunting area. K e n n e t h G. W ic k h a m , not apply for advance reservations, but The provisions of this special regula Major General, U.S. Army, may participate in the hunt if accom tion supplement the regulations which The Adjutant General. panied by an adult. govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas (8) Shells that contain shot larger generally which are set forth in Title 50, [F.R. Doc. 66-11002; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 8:45 a.m.j than BB ’s are prohibited. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and (9) Hunters are required to enter and are effective through January 8, 1967. . , leave the hunting area by way of the LOXAHATCHEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE check station located on State Highway Title 50— WILDLIFE AND 402. All waterfowl bagged must be Public hunting of ducks and coots presented for inspection at the check sta on the Loxahatchee National Wildlife FISHERIES tion before hunters leave the refuge. Refuge, Fla., is permitted only on the <10> A refuge permit is required of all area designated by signs as open to hunt Chapter 1—Bureau of Sport Fisheries hunters. A blind fee of $3 per blind per ing. This open area, comprising 29,000 and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife day is required. (One dollar per person acres, is delineated on a map available Service, Department of the Interior if three persons occupy a blind.) at the refuge headquarters, Delray (11) Applications for advance reserva Beach, Fla., and from the office of the PART 32— HUNTING tions for refuge permits must be sub Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish mitted in writing prior to October 25 to eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh National Wildlife Refuges in Florida the Refuge Manager, Merritt Island Building, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. Hunting and Certain Other States National Wildlife Refuge, Post Office Box shall be in accordance with all applica The following special regulations are 956, Titusville, Fla. 32780. Vacancies ble State and Federal regulations cover issued and are effective on date of pub not reserved by advance reservation will ing the hunting of ducks and coots sub lication in the F ederal R eg ister . The be awarded daily at the check station ject to the following special conditions: limited time ensuing from the date of on a first come, first served basis. Reser (1) The possession or use of shells con the adoption of the national migratory vation commitments for a refuge permit taining shot larger than No, 4 is pro game bird regulations to and including are not transferable and, unless claimed hibited. the establishment of State hunting sea prior to 1 hour before shooting time, are (2) Only temporary blinds constructed sons makes it impracticable to give pub automatically canceled. of native vegetation are permitted. lic notice of proposed rulemaking. ■Die provisions of this special regula (3) Hunters must enter and leavb the tion supplement the regulations which refuge by either the S-39 landing or the § 32.12 Special regulations; migratory govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas headquarters landing and must use the game birds; for individual wildlife generally which are set forth in Title 50, following designated routes of travel to refuge areas, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and and from the hunting area: Those por F lorid a are effective through January 8, 1967. tions of Canal 40 and Canal 39 (Hillsboro Canal) immediately east and south of MERRITT ISLAND NATIONAL WILDLIFE CHASSAHOWITZKA NATIONAL WILDLIFE the hunting area; also the refuge marsh REFUGE REFUGE areas near the headquarters landing and Public hunting of dudes and coots on Public hunting of ducks and coots on the S-39 landing lying between the hunt the Merritt Island National Wildlife the Chassahowitzka National Wildlife ing area and portions of canals described Refuge, Fla., is permitted only on the Refuge, Fla., is permitted only on the above. No hunting is permitted in or area designated by signs as open to area designated by signs as open to hunt over these designated routes of travel. hunting. This open area, comprising ing. This open area, comprising 2,500 (4) While using designated routes of 4,000 acres, is delineated on a map avail acres, is delineated on a map available travel to and from the hunting area, able at the refuge headquarters, Titus at the refuge headquarters and from the hunters must have their shotguns un ville, Fla., and from the office of the Regional Director, Bureau of Sport loaded and dismantled or cased. Regional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- (5) Air-thrust boats may be author eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. ized for use only by special permit issued Building, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. Hunting Hunting shall be in accordance with all by the refuge manager. shall be in accordance with all appli applicable State and Federal regulations (6) All public use within the refuge is cable State and Federal regulations governing the hunting of ducks and coots limited to the period each day from 1 covering the hunting of ducks and subject to the following special con hour before sunrise to 1 hour after sunset. coots subject to the" following special ditions: (7) Each hunter will be permitted to conditions: <1) Hunting will be permitted only on use dogs for the purpose of retrieving (1) Hunting will be permitted only Wednesday through Sundays during the dead or wounded birds, but such dogs from one-half hour before sunrise until periods November 24 through November shall not be permitted to run at large on noon, 5 days per week, Tuesday through 27, 1966, and December 3, 1966, through the public shooting grounds or elsewhere Saturday, during the periods November January 8,1967. on the refuge. 24 through November 27, 1966, and De The provisions of this special regula (2) No more than two dogs per hunter cember 3, 1966, through January 8, 1967. tion supplement the regulations which may be used only to retrieve wounded or (2) Hunters will be permitted to hunt govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas dead birds. only from designated blinds furnished generally which are set forth in Title and located by the Bureau. Shooting is (3) Only temporary blinds constructed 50, Code of Federal Regulations, Part not permitted outside a blind. of native vegetation are permitted. 32, and are effective through January 8, (3) Guns must be unloaded while (4) Designated routes of travel must 1967. . being transported on the refuge and be used for entering or leaving the public A labam a hunting area. while being carried to and from the WHEELER NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE blinds. Guns must be left in the blind (5) A Federal permit is required for while dead or crippled birds are being the use of airboats in the refuge area. Public hunting of geese, ducks, and retrieved. Airboat permits may be obtained by ap coots on the Wheeler National Wildlife (4) A maximum of three persons will plying in person at refuge headquarters, Refuge, Ala., is permitted only on the be permitted to shoot from one blind. 4l/2 miles south of Homosassa Springs, area designated by signs as open to hunt (5) Participants in the hunt are re Fla., between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and ing. This open area, comprising 6,000 quired to furnish either a retriever or a 4 p,m., Monday through Friday. All acres, is delineated on a map available boat for retrieving birds which fall across airboats must be equipped with exhaust at the refuge headquarters, Decatur, Ala., or in deep water. mufflers. and from the Office of the Regional FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— -TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13131 Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and 1 hour before legal hunting hours. Res Bridge. All hunters must check out at Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Build ervation commitments for a refuge per the check station as soon as possible ing, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. Hunting shall be mit are nontransferable. after completing their hunt and must accordance with all applicable State and The provisions of this special regula present all bagged game for inspection. Federal regulations covering the hunting tion supplement the regulations which H ie provisions of this special regula of geese, ducks, and coots subject to the govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas tion supplement the regulations which following conditions: generally which are set forth in Title 50, govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas (1) Open season— Geese: November Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and generally which are set forth in Title 50, 16, 1966, through January 14, 1967. are effective through January 14,1967. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, Ducks and coots: November 24,. 1966, and are effective through January 7, N o r t h C a r o l in a through January 7,1967. A kill quota of 1967. 2,000 geese is established. If this quota MATTAMUSKEET NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE M is s is s i p p i is reached during the above open season, Public hunting of ducks, geese, and NOXUBEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE the refuge hunt for all waterfowl species coots on the Mattamuskeet National will be terminated. During the above Wildlife Refuge, N.C., is permitted only Public hunting of ducks and coots on seasons, hunting will be permitted only on the area designated by signs as open the Noxubee National Wildlife Refuge, on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Fridays, and to hunting. This open area, comprising Miss., is permitted only on the area Saturdays, from one-half hour before 11,300 acres, is delineated on a map designated by signs as open to hunting. sunrise to 12 noon. available at the refuge headquarters, This open area, comprising 520 acres, is (2) Blinds— The construction of blinds New Holland, N.C., and from the office delineated on a map available at the by the public is prohibited. Hunting of the Regional Director, Bureau of refuge headquarters and from the Re shall be only from those blinds con Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peach gional Director, Bureau of Sport Fish structed and labeled by the Bureau. tree-Seventh Building, Atlanta, * Ga. eries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree- (3) Guns must be unloaded and cased 30323. Hunting shall be in accordance Seventh Building, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. at all times except when hunters are with all applicable State and Federal Hunting shall be in accordance with all inside blinds. No shooting is permitted regulations covering the hunting of applicable State and Federal regulations outside blinds. Hunters are authorized ducks, geese, and coots. governing the hunting of ducks and coots to hunt only from the blind specified on The provisions of this special regula subject to the following special condi their permits. tion supplement the regulations which tions: (4) Ammunition— Shells that contain govern hunting on wildlife, refuge areas (1) Hunting will be permitted only on shot larger than No. 2 may not be used generally which are set forth in Title 50, Mondays, Wednesdays, and Saturdays and will not be permitted in the pos Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, from one-half hour before sunrise to session of hunters. No hunter may and are effective through January 14, 12 o’clock noon during the period Novem possess more than 15 shells of any shot ber 26, 1966, through January 7, 1967. size or fire more than 15 shots during 1967. G eo rg ia (2) The use of boats without motors any one hunting trip. is permitted within the hunting area, (5) Crows and foxes may also be shot SAVANNAH NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE except that electric motors may be used. during the hunt period, provided these (3) The construction of blinds is not are shot from designated Waterfowl Public hunting of ducks and coots on the Savannah National Wildlife Refuge, permitted. blinds. (4) Hunters will not be permitted to (6) Intoxicating beverages will not be Ga., Is permitted only on the area desig nated by signs as open to hunting. This enter the hunting area sooner than 15 permitted on the refuge. minutes before legal shooting hours. (7) Hunters will not be permitted to open area, comprising 3,600 acres, is de lineated on a map available at the refuge (5) All hunters must enter and leave enter the hunting area sooner than 1 y2 the waterfowl hunting area by way of hours before legal hunting hours and headquarters, Route 1, Hardeeville, S.C. 29927, and from the office of the Regional the designated access point. must leave the area promptly after 12 (6) No hunter may take more than 16 noon. Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Build shotgun shells into the hunting area. (8) A maximum of two persons will be (7) No shooting will be permitted permitted to hunt from each blind. ing, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. Hunting shall be in accordance with all applicable from the levee or the open water area (9) Hunters under 16 years of age State and Federal regulations covering immediately adjacent to the levee. must be accompanied by adults. the hunting of ducks and coots subject (8) All hunters are required to check (10) Each hunter must have a refuge to the following special conditions: out at the designated check station permit. To obtain a permit individuals (1) Hunting will be permitted only on before leaving the area. must present a valid Alabama hunting Thursdays, Fridays, and Saturdays, from The provisions of this special regula license, a duck stamp (if persons have one-half hour before sunrise to 1 p.m., tion supplement the regulations which attained 16th birthday) and pay a blind during the period November 24, 1966, govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas fee of $4 ($2 per person if two persons through January 7, 1967. generally which are set forth in Title 50, occupy blind). (2) Hunting will not be permitted in Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32, and (11) Hunters are required to stop at or on Front River, Middle River, Steam are effective through January 7, 1967. the permit office at the close of each hunt, boat River, and Back River, nor closer S o u t h C a r o l in a return permits, and allow game to be than 50 yards to the shoreline of these examined. rivers. SANTEE NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE (12) Applications for advance reserva (3) Hunters will not be permitted to Public hunting of geese, ducks, and tions for refuge permits must be submit enter the hunting area sooner than 1% coots on the Santee National Wildlife ted in writing to the refuge manager. hours before sunrise. Refuge, Pinopolis Unit, South Carolina is Applications for advance reservations (4) Guns must be unloaded while be permitted only on the area designated by will be accepted during the period Sep ing carried to and from the hunting signs as open to hunting. This open tember 15 through 30. Only one appli area. area, comprising approximately 29,500 cation will be accepted per individual, (5) Only t e m p o r a r y blinds con acres, is delineated on a map available and this for a maximum of 1 hunting structed of native materials are per at the refuge headquarters, Summerton, ^ eservations will be awarded on mitted. S.C., and from the office of the Regional the basis of a drawing held at the refuge (6) Dogs used to retrieve waterfowl Director, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and office on October 3,1966. Blinds not re must be under complete control at all Wildlife, 809 Peachtree-Seventh Build served and those for which reservations times. ing, Atlanta, Ga. 30323. Hunting shall are not claimed within 1 hour of legal (7) Before entering the hunting area, be in accordance with all applicable State hunting hours will be awarded on the hunters are required to obtain a permit and Federal regulations covering the oasis of a drawing held at the permit at the refuge check station, located on hunting of geese, ducks, and coots sub omce each hunt morning approximately U.S. Highway 17 at the Middle River ject to the following special conditions: FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13132 RULES AND REGULATIONS (1) Hunting will be permitted only on ernment. The following matters are in (i) Total supply of ELS cotton for the Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays cluded in §§ 722.551 to 722.553: marketing year beginning August 1,1966, during the period from November 24, (a) Proclamation for the 1967 crop of in running bales or equivalent: 1966, through January 7, 1967. ELS cotton of a national marketing Bales (2) Shooting hours are from one-half quota and a national acreage allotment. (a) Carryover______240,000 hour before sunrise to 12 o’clock noon. (b) Apportionment of the national { b ) Estimated production------86,900 (c) Estimated im ports______85,600 Hunters may not enter the refuge hunt allotment to the States. ing area prior to IV2 hours before sun Notice that the Secretary was prepar Total supply ______412,500 rise and must be out of the Pinopolis ing to determine whether a national mar Pool area by 1 p.m. keting quota would be required under the (b) Finding of normal supply. As de (3) Only temporary blinds constructed act for the 1967 crop of ELS cotton and fined in section 301(b) (10) (C ) of the of native vegetation are permitted. Any notice with respect to the matters listed act, the “normal supply” of ELS cotton blind constructed by a hunter on the in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this pre for the marketing year beginning August hunting area, once vacated, may be occu amble was published in the F ederal 1, 1966 (in terms of running bales or pied by any other hunter on a first come, R e g ist e r on July 2, 1966 (31 F.R. 9138), equivalent), consists of the sum of (1) first served basis. in accordance with section 4 of the Ad estimated domestic consumption of Ei.s (4) Boats are not to be left in Pinop- ministrative Procedure Act (60 Stat. 238; cotton for the marketing year beginning olis Pool overnight. 5 UJS.C. 1003). No written submissions August 1, 1966, (2) estimated exports of (5) Boat motors of any type (inboard, were received in response to such notice. ELS cotton during the marketing year outboard, gasoline, diesel, or electric) are In order that. State and county ASC beginning August 1, 1966, and (3) 30 not allowed in the Pinopolis Pool. committees may complete the necessary percent of the sum of such estimated The provisions of this special regula work in issuing farm allotment notices domestic consumption and estimated ex tion supplement the regulations which for the 1967 crop of ELS cotton as soon ports as an allowance for carryover. govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas as possible, it is essential that §§ 722.551 The following finding of normal supply generally which are set forth in Title 50, to 722.553 be made effective as soon as is hereby made by the Secretary : Code of Federal Regulations, Part 32 and possible. Accordingly, it is hereby deter (i) Normal supply of ELS cotton for are effective through January 7, 1967. mined and found that compliance with the marketing year beginning August 1, the 30-day effective date requirement of 1966, in running bales or equivalent: W alter A. G r e s h , Regional Director, Bureau of section 4 of the Administrative Procedure Bales Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. Act is impracticable and contrary to the (o ) Estimated domestic comsump- public interest and §§ 722.551 to 722.553 tion ______!______145,000 [F.R. Doc. 66-11017; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; shall be effective upon filing this docu (b) Estimated exports_.______0 8:46 a m .] ment with the Director, Office of the (c) 30 percent aUowance for carry Federal Register. over ______43,500 Sec. Normal supply______188,500 Title 7— AGRICULTURE 722.551 National marketing quota for the 1967 crop of ELS cotton. (ii) It is also hereby determined that Chapter VII— Agricultural Stabiliza 722.552 National acreage allotment for the 108 percent of such normal supply equals tion and Conservation Service (Ag 1967 crop of ELS cotton. 203,580 running bales or equivalent. ricultural Adustment), Department 722.553 Apportionment of national allot (c) Proclamation of national market ment to the States. of Agriculture ing quota. It is hereby determined and A u t h o r it y : The provisions of §§ 722.551 to proclaimed by the Secretary that the SUBCHAPTER B— FARM MARKETING QUOTAS 722.553 issued under secs. 301, 342, 344, 347, total supply of ELS cotton for the mar AND ACREAGE ALLOMENTS 375, 52 Stat. 38, as amended; 63 Stat. 670, keting year beginning August 1, 1966, PART 722— COTTON as amended; 63 Stat. 675, as amended; 52 will exceed the normal supply of ELS Stat. 66, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1301, 1342, cotton for such marketing year by more Subpart— 1967 Crop of Extra Long 1344,1347,1375. than 8 percent. Therefore, a national marketing quota shall be in effect for the Staple Cotton; Acreage Allotments § 722.551 National marketing quota for and Marketing Quotas the 1967 crop o f ELS cotton. crop of ELS cotton produced in the cal endar year 1967. Basis and purpose. The provisions of (a) Finding of total supply. As de (d) Proclamation of amount of na §§ 722.551 to 722.553 are issued pursuant fined in section 301(b) (16) (C ) of the act, tional marketing quota in hales. Sec to the Agricultural Adjustment Act of the “total supply” of ELS cotton for the tion 347 of the act provides that the 1938, as amended (52 Stat. 31, as marketing year beginning August 1,1966 amount of the national marketing quota amended; 7 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.) (referred (in terms of running bales or the equiva for the 1967 crop of ELS cotton (in terms to as the “act”) , with respect to the 1967 lent), consists of the sum of (1) “carry of standard bales of 500 pounds gross crop of extra long staple cotton. The over” of ELS cotton on August 1, 1966, weight) shall be the largest of the term “extra long staple cotton” (referred (2) estimated production of ELS cotton following : x to as “ELS cotton”) as used in § 722-551 in the United States during 1966, and (3) (1) The number of bales of ELS cot (a ) and (b) means the kinds of cotton estimated imports of ELS cotton into ton equal to the estimated domestic described in section 347(a) of the act, the United States during the marketing consumption plus exports for the mar including American-Egyptian cotton, year beginning August 1,1966. Pursuant keting year beginning August 1, 1967; Sea Island cotton in both the continental to Public Law 87-548 enacted July 25, less the estimated imports for the m ar United States and Puerto Rico, and Sea- 1962 (76 Stat. 218), the term “carryover” keting year beginning August 1, 1967; land cotton, and all imports of similar does not include any domestically grown plus such additional number of bales, type cotton produced in Egypt, Sudan, ELS cotton which was transferred or if any, as the Secretary determines is and Peru. Exports of ELS cotton from made available to the Commodity Credit necessary to assure adequate working Commodity Credit Corporation stocks Corporation from the stockpile estab stocks in trade channels until ELS cot estimated to be made pursuant to 7 U.S.C. lished under the Strategic and Critical ton from the next crop becomes readily 1852a are excluded from the determina Materials Stockpiling Act, as amended available without resort to Commodity tions of estimated exports under § 722.551 (50 U.S.C. 98), and which has not been Credit Corporation stocks. (b) and FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13133 tional marketing quota for the 1967 crop 3283, 5681, 7999, 9546, 9939,11307, 11711) other Central American Common Mar of cotton (in terms of standard bales is to revise the determination of sugar ket countries. In this same action, an of 500 pounds gross weight) shall be requirements for the calendar year 1966, additional deficit for Panama of 595 79,761 bales based on subparagraph (1) establish quotas, prorations and direct- short tons, raw value, plus an additional of this paragraph including an adjust consumption limits consistent with such 5.430 short tons, raw value, of the deficit ment of 19,000 bales to assure adequate requirements and to determine and pro previously allocated to the Republic of working stocks. This determination is rate or allocate deficits in quotas pur the Philippines which it was unable to based on the following data: suant to the Sugar Act of 1948, as amend fill, totaling 6,025 short tons, raw value, were prorated to Western Hemisphere Determinations for purposes o f: ed (61 Stat. 922, as amended), herein (i) Section 722.551(d)(3)1------43,500 after referred to as the “Act.” countries listed in section 202(c) (3) (A ) % (ii) Section 722.551(d)(1)1...... 79,761 Section 201 of the Act directs the Sec of the Act which were able to supply Based on: retary to revise the determination of such additional sugar. (iii) Estimated domestic con sugar requirements at such times during Except for an additional reduction of sumption a ______145, 000 the calendar year as he deems necessary. 5.430 short tons in the deficit proration (iv) Estimated exports2______None In view of the greater than normal to the Republic of the Philippines, such (v) Estimated imports 3______85,600 previous allocations of deficits are not (vi) Adjustment for stocks ____ 19,000 seasonal distribution of refined sugar through September and the continued disturbed by the action taken herein. 1 Standard bales. strong demand for off-shore raw sugar, As a result of the increase in consump 2 Running bales. tion requirements determined herein and 3 Equivalent running bales. it is apparent that additional supplies of readily available raw sugar are needed under section 204(a) of the Act, Nicara § 722.552 National acreage allotment to meet the requirements for consumers. gua has an additional deficit of 972 short for the 1967 crop of ELS cotton. Accordingly, sugar requirements for the tons, raw value, which is prorated herein It is hereby determined and proclaimed calendar year 1966 are hereby increased to other Central American Common that a national acreage allotment shall by 50,000 short tons, raw value, to a total Market countries; Panama has an addi be in effect for the crop of ELS cotton of 10,375,000 short tons, raw value. tional deficit in the amount of 594 short tons, raw value, and the Republic of the produced in the calendar year 1967. Section 204(a) of the Act provides that Philippines will be unable to fill the The amount of such national allotment the Secretary shall from time to time deficit previously allocated to it in the is 70,500 acres (rounded to nearest 100 determine whether any area or country additional amount of 5,430 short tons, acres) calculated by multiplying the na will be unable to fill its quota or prora raw value, which amounts totaling 6,024 tional quota in bales by 480 pounds (net tion of a quota. The governments of the short tons, raw value, are herein prorated weight of a standard bale) and dividing Republic of the Philippines, Nicaragua, to Western Hemisphere countries listed the result by the national average yield and Panama notified the Department in section 202(c) (3) (A ) of the Act which of 543 pounds per acre of ELS cotton for prior to August 1, 1966, that they would are able to supply such additional sugar the 4 calendar years 1962,1963,1964, and be unable to fill that part of their 1966 on the basis of published quotas most 1965. sugar quotas in excess of 1,202,978,19,000 recently in effect. § 722.553 Apportionment of national and 13,000 short tons, raw value, respec allotment to the States. tively. Accordingly, a finding has here Effective date. This action increases The national allotment of 70,500 acres tofore been made (31 F.R. 11307) under by 50,000 short tons, raw value, the is apportioned to the States in accord section 202(d)(4) of the Act, that such quantity that foreign countries, other ance with section 344(b) of the act as failure of the Republic of the Philippines, than the Republic of the Philippines, follows: Nicaragua, and Panama to fill their re may import. To permit such countries spective quotas was due to crop disaster for which larger prorations are hereby State allotment State (acres) or other force majeure. Pursuant to sec established to plan and to market in an Arizona ______30, 591 tion 204(b) of the Act, the quota, includ orderly manner the larger quantity of California ______.______472 ing prorated deficits, for the Republic of sugar, it is essential at this time that Florida______198 the Philippines has been reduced to all persons selling and purchasing sugar Georgia______98 1,202,978 short tons, raw value; the quota for consumption in the continental New Mexico______14,249 for Nicaragua has been reduced to 19,000 United States be promptly informed of Texas______24,846 short tons, raw value; and the quota for the changes in marketing opportunities. Puerto Rico______46 Panama has been reduced to 13,000 short Therefore, it is hereby determined and United States______70,500 tons, raw value, representing the ap found that compliance with the notice, proximate quantity of sugar each coun procedure and effective date require Effective date: Date of filing this docu try will be able to supply in 1966. ments of the Administrative Procedure ment with the Director, Office of the Fed It is herein determined that 116,290 Act is unnecessary, impracticable and eral Register. short tons, raw value, of the deficit pre contrary to the public interest and this Signed at Washington, D.C., on Octo viously allocated to the Republic of the amendment shall be effective upon pub ber?, 1966. Philippines shall be reproratated and to lication in the F e d eral R e g is t e r . J o h n A. S c h n it t k e r , tal deficits are herein determined for Nic By virtue of the authority vested in Acting Secretary. aragua and Panama of 32,982 and 18,779 the Secretary of Agriculture by the Act, [F.R. Doc. 66-11078; Filed, Oct. 7, 1966; short tons, raw value, respectively. In a Part 811 of this chapter is hereby amend 2:44 p.m.] previous action taken prior to Septem ed by amending §§ 811.40, 811.41, 811.42, ber 1,1966 (31 F.R. 11307), the deficit in and 811.43 as follows: the quota determined for Panama at that 1. Section 811.40 is amended to read Chapter VIII— Agricultural Stabiliza as follows: tion and Conservation Service time of 17,590 short tons, raw value, plus 105,430 short tons, raw value, of the defi § 811.40 Sugar requirements,* 1966. (Sugar), Department of Agriculture cit previously allocated to the Republic SUBCHAPTER B— SUGAR REQUIREMENTS of the Philippines, which totaled 123,020 The amount of sugar needed to meet AND QUOTAS short tons, raw value, was allocated to the the requirements of consumers in the continental United States for the «a l [Sugar Reg. 811, Arndt. 10] Dominican Republic on August 26, 1966, on the basis of a determination issued by endar year 1966 is hereby determined to PART 811— CONTINENTAL SUGAR RE the President to* the Secretary of Agri be 10,375,000 short tons, raw value. QUIREMENTS AND AREA QUOTAS culture dated August 17,1966; and 31,040 2. Section 811.41 is amended by Requirements, Quotas and Quota short tons, raw value, of the deficit for amending subparagraph (1) of para Nicaragua was prorated to other Central graph (a) to read as follows: Deficits for 1966 American Common Market countries. Basis and purpose and statement of In another action taken on Septem § 811.41 Quotas for domestic areas. oases and considerations. The purpose ber 7,1966 (31 F.R. 11711), an additional (a) (1) For the calendar year 1966 of this amendment to Sugar Regulation deficit of 970 short tons, raw value, de domestic area quotas limiting the quanti 811 (30 F.R. 15313, 31 F.R. 2776, 2895, termined for Nicaragua was prorated to ties of sugar which may be brought into FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 No. 197------4 13134 RULES AND REGULATIONS or marketed for consumption in the con for Panama of 594 short tons, raw value, pursuant to section 202 of the Act are tinental United States are established, and an additional 5,430 short tons, raw shown in columns (1) and (2) of the pursuant to section 202(a) of the Act, value, of the deficit proration which the following table. Deficit prorations pre in column (1) and the amounts of such Republic of the Philippines is unable to viously established in Amendments 5, 8, quotas for offshore areas that may be fill are prorated to Western Hemisphere and 9 of § 811.43 of this part (31 F.R. filled by direct-consumption sugar are countries listed in section 202(c) (3) (A ) 7999, 11307, 11711), are shown in col established, pursuant to section 207 of of the Act which are able to supply such umn (3). In column (4) the additional the Act, in column (2) as follows: additional sugar. deficit in the section 202 quota for Nicaragua due to. the increase in require 4. Section 811.43 is amended by Direct- ments by this action, and amounting Quotas consump amending paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) to 972 short tons, raw value, is prorated Area tion limits to read as follows: herein to other Central American Com (1) (2) § 811.43 Quotas for foreign countries. mon Market countries; the additional deficit in the section 202 quota for Short tons raw value (a) For the calendar year 1966, the Panama due to the increase in require 3.025.000 <*) quota for the Republic of the Philippines ments, amounting to 594 short tons, raw 1.100.000 (») 1,200,227 35,482 is 1,202,978 short tons, raw value, rep value, and the additional portion of the 1,140,000 155,625 resenting 1,123,305 short tons established previously prorated deficit which the 15,000 0 pursuant to section 202 of the Act and Republic of the Philippines is unable 79,673 short tons established pursuant to fill, amounting to 5,430 short tons, 1 No limit. to section 204 of the Act. raw value, are herein prorated to West • * * * * (b) O f the quantity of 1,123,305 short ern Hemisphere countries listed in sec 3. S ectio n 811.42 is amended bytons established in paragraph ( a ) , only tion 202(c) (3) (A ) of the Act which have amending paragraphs (b) and (c) to 59,920 short tons, raw value, may be indicated that they are able to supply read as follows: filled by direct-consumption sugar, pur such additional sugar on the basis of suant to section 207(d) of the Act. published qUbtas most recently in effect. § 811.42 Proration and allocation of (c) For the calendar year 1966, the Total quotas and prorations are herein deficits and quotas in effect. prorations to individual foreign countries established as shown in column (5). ***** (b) Pursuant to section 204(a) of the Temporary ; Previous Act, a deficit is hereby determined in quotas and j deficits and N ew deficits Total quotas Country Basic quotas prorations i deficit and deficit and the section 202 quota determined herein pursuant to prorations prorations prorations in § 811.43 for Nicaragua amounting to sec. 202 (d) 32,982 short tons, raw value. O f such amount, 32,010 short tons, raw value, Mexico______213,821 224,844 44,491 V 1,127 484,283 Dominican Republic______209,118 219,898 166,831 1,395 597,242 previously allocated to other Central Brazil______209,118 219,898 43,513 : 1,103 473,632 American Common Market, countries on Peru ______166, 797 175,395 34,706 879 377,777 August 26,1966 (31 F.R. 11307), and Sep British W est Indies 83,537 73,910 17,357 413 175,217 Ecuador______30,427 31,996 6,331 160 68,914 tember 7,1966 (31 F.R. 11711) , are here ¡French West Indies______26,279 23,249 . 5,461 130 55,119 by allocated in the same manner, and 972 Argentina.. 25,725 27,051 5,353 136 58,265 Costa Rica...... 24,618 27,364 18,311 559 70,852 short tons, raw value, are allocated in Nicaragua 24,618 27,364 -32,010 -972 19,000 section 811.43 to other Central American Colombia______22,129 23,269 4,605 117 50,120 Guatemala 20, 746 23,060 15,430 472 59,708 Common Market countries able to fill Panama______15,490 16,289 -18,185 -594 13,000 additional quota- El Salvador _ . 15,214 16,910 11,317 346 43,787 (c) Pursuant to section 204(a) of the H a i t i ...... i 11,618 12,217 2,417 61 26,313 Venezuela______: 10,511 11,053 2,187 55 23,806 Act, a deficit of 18,779 short tons, raw British Honduras.. . 6,085 5,384 1,264 30 12,763 value, is hereby determined in the sec Bolivia. 2,490 2,618 518 13 5,639 A u stralia.______99,581 87,546 187,127 tion 202 quota for Panama referred to in Requblic of China______"~41,492 36,477 77,969 § 811.43 and it is hereby determined that India 39,832 35! 018 74,850 South Africa 29! 321 25| 777 65,098 the Republic of the Philippines will be Fiji Islands...... 21,852 19! 212 41.064 unable to fill the proration established in 9,128 8! 025 17,153 9! 128 8! 025 17,153 paragraph (a ) of this section of 195,963 4,702 4,134 8,836 short tons, raw value, by 116,290 short 3,596 3! 161 6,757 tons, raw value. In accordance with sec 5! 351 5,351 tion 204(a) of the Act and a Presidential Memorandum dated August 17,1966,17,- 1 Proration of quotas withheld from Cuba, Southern Rhodesia and the proration of the Honduras quota to Central 590 short tons, raw value of the Panama American Common Market countries. * ••••** deficit and 105,430 short tons, raw value of the Philippine shortfall were allocated (Secs. 201, 202, 204, and 403; 61 Stat. 923 as Chapter IX— Consumer and Market on August 26, 1966, to the Dominician amended, 924 as amended, 925 as amended ing Service (Marketing Agreements Republic, and such allocation is hereby and 932 as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1111,1112,1114, and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, reestablished. Also, in accordance with and 1153) Nuts), Department of Agriculture section 204(a) of the Act, an additional deficit of 595 short tons, raw value, for Effective date. This order will become [Grapefruit Reg. 33] Panama plus an additional shortfall in effective upon publication in the F ederal FART 909— GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN the deficit proration to the Republic of R e g ister . ARIZONA; IN IMPERIAL COUNTY, the Philippines of 5,430 short tons, raw CALIF.; AND IN THAT PART OF RIV Signed at Washington, D.C., this 7th value, were prorated on September 7, ERSIDE COUNTY, CALIF., SITUATED 1966, to Western Hemisphere countries day of October 1966. SOUTH AND EAST OF WHITE listed in section 202(c) (3) (A ) of the Act J o h n A. S c h n it t k e r , WATER, CALIF. which were able to supply such addi Acting Secretary. Limitation of Shipments tional sugar, and such proration is here by re-established. Pursuant to section [F.R. Doc. 66-11082; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966, Findings. (1) Pursuant to the mar 204(a) of the Act, an additional deficit 8:49 a.m.] keting agreement, as amended, and Or- FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 RULES AND REGULATIONS 13135 der No. 909, as amended (7 CFR Part which for purpose of this regulation shall [Avocado Reg. 8, Amdt. 4] 909), regulating the handling of grape include the requirement that the grape PART 915— AVOCADOS GROWN fruit grown in the State of Arizona; in fruit be well colored, instead of slightly IN SOUTH FLORIDA Imperial County, Calif.; and in that part colored, and free from peel that is more of Riverside County, Calif., situated south than 1 inch in thickness at the stem Limitation of Shipments and east of White Water, Calif., effective end (measured from the flesh to the Findings. (1) Pursuant to the mar under the applicable provisions of the highest point of the peel) : Provided, keting agreement, as amended, and O r Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act That grapefruit having any amount of der No. 915, as amended (7 CFR Part of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), light or fairly light colored scarring may 915), regulating the handling of avoca and upon the basis of the recom be handled if they otherwise grade at dos grown in south Florida, effective un mendations of the Administrative Com least U.S. No. 2: Provided further, That der the applicable provisions of the mittee (established under the aforesaid the tolerances prescribed for the U.S. No. Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act amended marketing agreement and or 2 grade shall be the tolerance applicable of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), der) , and upon other available informa to the requirements of this subparagraph and upon the basis of the recommenda tion, it is hereby found that the limitation except that not more than 5 percent shall tions of the Avocado Administrative of shipments of grapefruit, as hereinafter be allowed for grapefruit having peel Committee, established under the afore provided, will tend to effectuate the more than 1 inch in thickness at the said marketing agreement and order, and declared policy of the act. stem end; or upon other available information, it is (2) It i&hereby further found that it is (ii) Any grapefruit which measure hereby found that the limitation of han impracticable and contrary to the pub less than 3u/l6 inches in diameter, except dling of avocados, as herein after pro lic interest to give preliminary notice, en that a tolerance of 5 percent, by count, gage in public rule-making procedure, for grapefruit smaller than inches vided, will tend to effectuate the declared and postpone the effective date of this shall be permitted, which tolerance shall policy of the act. (2) It is hereby further found that it is regulation until 30 days after publication be applied in accordance with the provi impracticable, unnecessary, and con thereof in the F ederal R e g ister (5 U.S.C. sions for the application of tolerances trary to the public interest to give prelim 1001-1011) because the time intervening specified in the revised U.S. Standards inary notice, engage in public rule-mak between the date when information upon for Grapefruit (California and Arizona), ing procedure, and postpone the effective which this regulation is based became 7 CFR 51.925-51.955: Provided, That in date of this amendment until 30 days available and the time when this regula determining the percentage of grapefruit after publication thereof in the F ederal tion must become effective in order to in any lot which are smaller than 3H46 R egister (5 U.S.C. 1001-1011) in that the effectuate the declared policy of the act inches in diameter, such percentage shall time intervening between the date when is insufficient, and a reasonable time is be based only on the grapefruit in such information upon which this amendment permitted, under the circumstances, for lot which are of a size 4%e inches in is based became available and the time preparation for such effective date. The diameter and smaller. when this amendment must become ef Administrative Committee held an open (2) Subject to the requirements of sub- meeting on September 29, 1966, to con fective, as hereinafter set forth, in order paragraph (1) (i) of this paragraph, any to effectuate the declared policy of the sider recommendation for regulation, handler may, but only as the initial han after giving due notice of such meeting, act is insufficient; and this amendment dler thereof, handle grapefruit smaller relieves restrictions on the handling of and interested persons were afforded an than 3Hie inches in diameter directly to avocados in that it permits shipment of opportunity to submit their views at this a destination in Zone 4, Zone 3, or Zone certain varieties of avocados at an earlier meeting; the recommendation and sup 2; and if the grapefruit is so handled date then currently provided. porting information for regulation dur directly to Zone 2 the grapefruit does not It is, therefore, ordered that the pro ing the period specified herein were measure less than 3%6 inches in diame promptly submitted to the Department visions Of § 915.308 (31 F.R. 7394, 8592, ter: Provided, That a tolerance of 5 per 9678,12398) are hereby further amended after such open meeting; necessary sup cent, by count, of grapefruit smaller than plemental economic and statistical in as follows: 3%6 inches in diameter shall be per 1. Paragraph (b) (2) is amended by formation upon which this recommended mitted, which tolerance shall be applied regulation is based were received by the inserting “and (11) ” immediately follow in accordance with the aforesaid provi ing “subparagraphs (9) and (10) .” Fruit Branch on October 3, 1966; infor sions for the application of tolerances mation regarding the provisions of the 2. A new subparagraph (b) (11) is and, in determining the percentage of added reading as follows: regulation recommended by the com grapefruit in any lot which are smaller mittee has been disseminated to shippers than 3%6 inches in diameter, such per § 915.308 Avocado Regulation 8. of grapefruit, grown as aforesaid, and centage shall be based only on the grape * * * * * this regulation, including the effective fruit in such lot which are 3X3/ig inches in (b ) * * * time thereof, is identical with the recom diameter and smaller. mendation of the committee; it is neces (b) As used herein, "handler,” "vari (11) During the period beginning at sary, in order to effectuate the declared ety,” “grapefruit,” "handle,” “Zone 1,” the effective time of this amendment and policy of the act, to make this regulation “Zone 2,” "Zone 3,” and "Zone 4” shall ending at 12:01 am., October 8, 1966, effective on the date hereinafter set forth have the same meaning as when used in so as to provide for the regulation of the avocados of any variety may be handled said amended marketing agreement and if the avocados meet the grade and ap handling of grapefruit at the start of this order; the terms “U.S. No. 2” and “well marketing season; and compliance with colored” shall have the same meaning as plicable minimum weight or diameter this regulation will not require any spe when used in the aforesaid revised U.S. requirements prescribed for the handling cial preparation on the part of persons Standards for Grapefruit; and “diam of such variety on October 24, 1966. subject thereto which cannot be com eter” shall mean the greatest dimension * * * * * pleted on or before the effective date hereof. measured at right angles to a line from The provisions of this amendment shall the stem to blossom end of the fruit. § 909.333 Grapefruit Regulation 33. become effective on October 5, 1966. (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended^ 7 (a) Order: (1) Except as otherwise U.S.C. 601-674) (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. provided in subparagraph (2) of this 601-674) Dated: October 6,1966. p^r^ raPh, during the period beginning Dated: October 5, 1966. at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., October 16, 1966, F l o y d F. H e d l u n d , F l o y d F . H e d l u n d , and ending at 12:01 a.m., P.s.t., August Director, Fruit and Vegetable , ’ n° handler shall handle from Director, Fruit and Vegetable tne State of California or the State of Division, Consumer and Mar Division, Consumer and Mar rizona to any point outside thereof: keting Service. keting Service. tv,U) Any grapefruit which do not meet [F.R. Doc. 66-11023; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; [P R . Doc. 66-11024; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; ne re(Wirements of the U.S. No. 2 grade 8:47 a.m.] 8:47 am.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13136 Proposed Rule Making ing, Washington, D.C. 20250, not later § 993.149 Receiving of prunes by han DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE than the 10th day after the publication dlers. Consumer and Marketing Service of this notice in the F ederal R e g ist e r . * * * * $ All written submissions made pursuant to (b ) Incoming inspection— * * * [ 7 CFR Part 929 ] this notice will be made available for (2) Certification. * * * (vi) in any public inspection at the office of the CRANBERRIES crop year in which a reserve percentage Hearing Clerk during regular business other than 0 percent is established, the Expenses and Rate of Assessment for hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). average size count of all prunes in the lot; 1966-67 Fiscal Period, Carryover Dated: October 6, 1966. and (vii) if substandard, the percentage by weight of off-grade primes (those de of Unexpended Funds, and Handler F l o y d F . H edlttnd, fective pursuant to § 993.97) necessary Reports Director, Fruit and Vegetable to be removed therefrom for the lot to be Division, Consumer and Mar Consideration is being given to the fol standard prunes, and the percentage by keting Service. lowing proposals submitted by the Cran weight and the average size count of berry Marketing Committee, established [F.R. Doc. 66-11048; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; those off-grade prunes with defects of under the marketing agreement and 8:49 a.m.] mold, imbedded dirt, insect infestation, Order No. 929 (7 CFR Part 929) regu and decay, and the percentage by weight, lating the handling of cranberries grown [ 7 CFR Part 993 3 of prunes with such defects necessary to in Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Con be removed in order for the balance of necticut, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Michi DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN the lot to be within the tolerance for such gan, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington, CALIFORNIA defects. • and Long Island in the State of New * * * * * York, effective under the applicable pro Receiving of Prunes by Handlers visions of the Agricultural Marketing (d) Prunes for nonhuman consump Notice is hereby given of a proposal, tion only— * * * Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 based upon a unanimous recommenda U.S.C. 601-674), as the agency to admin (2) Regulation on substandard prunes tion of the Prune Administrative Com ister the terms and provisions thereof: accumulated by a handler pursuant to (1) That the expenses that are reason mittee, to revise certain provisions of the § 993.49(c). To satisfy the obligation able and likely to be incurred by said Subpart— Administrative Rules and Reg imposed by § 993.49(c) to dispose of ex committee, during the fiscal period be ulations. The subpart is Operative pur cess defective prunes, other than those ginning August 1, 1966, and ending July suant to the marketing agreement, as of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, 31, 1967, will amount to $8,010. amended, and Order No. 993, as amended each handler shall dispose of, in non (7 CFR Part 993), regulating the han (2) That the Secretary of Agriculture human consumption outlets, a weight of fix the rate of assessment for said period, dling of dried prunes produced in Cali such prunes equal to the excess in sub fornia, effective under the Agricultural payable by each handler in accordance standard lots received and such prunes with § 929.41, at one-half cent ($0,005) Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as shall be prunes with defects of mold, amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). per barrel, or equivalent quantity, of imbedded dirt, insect infestation, or de cranberries; The proposed revision would change cay, as of their receipt by the handler, (a) certain information currently re (3) That unexpended funds in excess and shall not exceed by more than 20 quired by § 993.149(b) (2) to be shown on of expenses incurred during the fiscal prunes per pound the weighted average period ended July 31, 1966, be carried an inspector’s certificate issued with re size count of prunes with those defects in spect to a lot of dried prunes not returned over as a reserve in accordance with lots with an excess of such prunes. * * * § 929.42; and by a handler to the producer or dehydra * * * * * tor thereof, and (b) the applicability of Dated: October 6, 1966. (4) That reports be submitted to the the size tolerance currently permitted by committee by each handler showing the § 993.149(d) (2) for certain defective F l o y d F . H e d lu n d , total quantity of cranberries he has ac dried prunes required to be disposed of by Director, Fruit and Vegetable quired, the total quantity of cranberries handlers. The purpose of the revision is Division, Consumer and Mar he has handled, and the total quantity of to reduce the number of size count deter keting Service. cranberries and cranberry products, re minations of dried primes which cur spectively, he has on hand. The reports [F.R. Doc. 66-11049; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; rently must be made by the inspection 8:49 a.m.] would be rendered on a quarterly basis as service in those crop years in which a follows: November 1, 1966; February 1, reserve percentage of zero is established. 1967; May 1, 1967; and August 1, 1967. All persons Who desire to submit writ I 7 CFR Part 1041 3 Each report would cover the 3-month ten data, views, or arguments in con [Docket No. AO-72-A29] period preceding the applicable specified nection with the aforesaid proposal date and would be filed with the commit Should file the same in quadruplicate, MILK IN NORTHWESTERN OHIO tee not later than the 10th day of the first with the Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department MARKETING AREA month following such period. of Agriculture, Room 112, Administration Terms used in the marketing agree Building, Washington, D.C. 20250, not Notice of Recommended Decision and ment and order, shall, when used herein, later than the sixth day after the pub Opportunity To File Written Excep have the same meaning as is given to the lication of this notice in the F ederal R eg tions on Proposed Amendments to respective term in said marketing agree is t e r . All written submissions made pur Tentative Marketing Agreement ment and order. suant to this notice will be made avail All persons who desire to submit writ able for public inspection at the office of and to Order ten data, views, or arguments in connec the Hearing Clerk during regular busi Pursuant to the provisions of the Agri tion with the aforesaid proposals shall ness hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). cultural Marketing Agreement Act of file the same, in quadruplicate, with the The proposal is as follows: 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agri Revise § 993.149(b) (2) (vl) and (vii) and the applicable rules of practice and culture, Room 112, Administration Build and the first sentence of (d) (2) to read: procedure governing the formulation of FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 13137 marketing agreements and marketing or der markets and by the nine unregulated that at least some do not. It was ders (7 CFR Part 900), notice is hereby handlers, seven of which have theif brought out also that most of them have given of the filing with the Hearing Clerk plants located in such counties. some uses in their plants equivalent to of this recommended decision with re The area in question has been proposed Class II milk under the order and that spect to proposed amendments to the for inclusion in a Federal order on pre it is not unusual for them to have con tentative marketing agreement and or vious occasions. As late as 1964, when siderable quantities of surplus milk. der regulating the handling of milk in the North Central Ohio and Toledo or A representative of dairy farmers de the Northwestern Ohio marketing area. ders were merged, the four counties were livering to plants in the proposed area Interested parties may file written ex proposed for regulation. Official notice testified that at least some of the un ceptions to this decision with the Hear is taken of the Under Secretary’s decision regulated handlers do not rely heavily ing Clerk, U.S. Department of Agricul of November 13, 1964 (29 F.R. 15416) in on regulated markets for the area’s in ture, Washington, D.C. 20250, by the 15th this regard. The Under Secretary found creased fluid needs during the tourist day after publication of this decision in in the 1964 decision that the unregulated season. He stated that local farmers the F ederal R eg iste r . The exceptions territory in the four counties did not con have attempted over the years to tailor should be filed in quadruplicate. All stitute a primary distribution area for their production as closely as possible written submissions made pursuant to Northwestern Ohio handlers and, hence, to the needs of their market. Dairy this notice will be made available for should not be included in the marketing farmers have been encouraged to in public inspection at the office of the area at that time. crease production in the early summer Hearing Clerk during regular business The situation has not changed appre months rather than during the normally hours (7 CFR 1.27(b) ). ciably. The primary distributors in the short production months in the fall of Preliminary statement. The hearing four counties still are the unregulated the year as customary in most other mar on the record of which the proposed handlers. While Northwestern Ohio kets. He indicated that they have been amendments, as hereinafter set forth, handlers are the principal regulated per successful in providing much of increased to the tentative marketing agreement sons doing business in these counties, milk supply from their own farm re and to the order as amended, were for their distribution is less than one-third sources for the tourist season needs. mulated, was conducted at Stony Ridge, of the total. Regulated handlers have maintained Ohio, on July 6 and 7, 1966, pursuant to Proponents and opponents of the mar their proportion of sales in the four- notice thereof which was issued June 13, keting area expansion both presented re county area, and have had little diffi 1966 (31 F.R. 8496). sults of separate surveys with respect to culty in procuring milk supplies in The material issues on the record of the sales in. the proposed area by regulated competition with the unregulated han hearing relate to : and unregulated handlers. While there dlers. This makes difficult the conclu (1) Expansion of the marketing àrea. were admitted difficulties in determin sion that marketing conditions for (2) Requirements for pool participa ing actual sales volumes, the survey Northwestern Ohio producers have been tion. results were substantially in agreement. adversely affected by the competitive (3) Pricing diverted milk. It was shown that all regulated handlers situation in these counties. It is note (4) The “route disposition” definition. (including those regulated under the worthy also that handlers under the (5) The “fluid milk product” defini Columbus and Northwestern Ohio or Northeastern Ohio and Columbus orders, tion. ders) distribute between 40 and 45 who purchase Class I milk at somewhat (6) The level and seasonality of the percent of the total fluid milk sales in the higher Class I prices than Northwestern Class I price. four counties and the unregulated han Ohio handlers, have continued to com (7) The application of location differ dlers distribute between 55 and 60 per pete in these counties. entials. , ■ ' cent of such sales. It may not be concluded from the rec (8) Time and method of reporting re In support of their proposal, producers ord that the four counties are part of ceipts and utilization of milk and of pay contended that unregulated handlers the primary distribution area of North ing producers. have a competitive advantage over regu western Ohio regulated handlers. Class Findings and conclusions. The fol lated handlers both in the procurement I sales of Northwestern Ohio handlers in lowing findings and conclusions on the of milk supplies and in the sale of milk the proposed area represent only about material issues are based on evidence in the proposed area. They pointed out 4 percent of their total Class 1 distribu presented at the hearing and the record that unregulated handlers purchase milk tion and, as previously stated, less than thereof: on a “flat price” basis without regard to one-third of the total sales in such area. (1) The Northwestern Ohio marketing the utilization in their plants. The unregulated handlers involved dis area should not be expanded at this time. Although specific data were not pre tribute no fluid milk products in the The proposal to include in the marketing sented at the hearing, producers claimed present marketing area but compete area the Ohio counties of Erie, Huron, that the unregulated handlers are able with regulated handlers only in the un and Ottawa, and the unregulated por to maintain a high Class I utilization regulated territory. Marketing condi tion of Sandusky County therefore is aided by the purchase of supplemental tions do not justify the inclusion of this denied. milk supplies from regulated handlers territory in the marketing area at this The proposal to expand the marketing during the summer tourist season when time. area was submitted by the Northwestern supplies from their regular dairy farm (2) The pooling requirements for dis Cooperative Sales Association, a co ers are insufficient, sometimes even less tributing plants should be modified. operative representing about 85 per than their Class I sales. The fact of a The principal cooperative association cent of the producers in the market. It high Class I utilization paid for on a flat proposed that one pf the standards for was supported also by the principal co price basis, it was stated, gives them a pooling a distributing plant be modified. operative in the Northeastern Ohio competitive advantage over regulated The proposal would allow such a plant market and a Northwestern Ohio reg handlers in the procurement of milk in to retain pool status even though it dis ulated handler. The nine unregulated a common supply area and results in the tributed, during the month, less than handlers distributing milk in the four- Northwestern Ohio market carrying the 50 percent of its Grade A milk receipts county area and their approximately 100 reserve supply for such counties. on routes, provided it had met such re dairy farmer suppliers opposed expan It is not clear from this record whether quirement in 5 of the 6 preceding months. sion. unregulated handlers do, in fact, have The proposal was supported by handlers. . The present estimated population of any substantial advantage in the pro Proponents pointed out that under the the proposed area is about 220,000. Be curement and sale of milk in the four- present provisions it is possible for a cause of its proximity to Lake Erie, there county area and, if so, whether this has distributing plant to lose its pool status, ? substantial population increase had adverse affect upon the orderly mar however unintentionally, if it drops even auring the summer tourist season of keting of milk by Northwestern Ohio slightly below the minimum 50 percent ¿une July, and August. Fluid milk is producers. While certain of the unreg route distribution percentage require attributed in the area by regulated han- ulated handlers do rely on regulated ment for the month. Several handlers aiers in the Columbus, Northwestern markets for supplemental milk supplies qualify in some months by only a very unio, and Northeastern Ohio Federal or during the tourist season, it is evident small amount over the present minimum FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13138 PROPOSED RULE MAKING requirement. In this market it is not The marketing area uniform price producers involved understandably ob unusual for large wholesale accounts to establishes the value of milk delivered ject to the lower price received. be switched from one handler to another f.o.b. plants in the marketing area. While the problem is greatly reduced on short notice which can cause a han Lower prices, adjusted to reflect the cost by the elimination of location differ dler to fall below the 50 percent require of transporting milk to market from entials within the marketing area, there ment. At least once in the last 18 various locations, apply at outlying may be occasions when the proposed months a handler has found himself in plants. Thus, when a producer’s milk is change in point of pricing will enhance the position of inadvertently failing by a delivered to an outlying pool plant and the ability of the cooperative to channel small margin to meet such requirement. the full cost of transportation to the milk from one handler to another within Producers further requested that the marketing area is not incurred, the uni the market as handler bottling require order contain a provision requiring the form price to such producer is reduced ments change. Marketing efficiency market administrator to notify any co by a location differential. should be improved. It also will simplify operative associations with milk delivered Similarly, when the milk of a distant the accounting with respect to such to a plant of the failure of the plant to producer is diverted to an outlying non diverted milk. meet the 50 percent requirement even pool plant, full transportation cost to A limit should be provided, however, though such plant is continued in the market is not incurred and a location on the number of days that a producer’s pool as proposed. It was stated that price should apply to such milk. deliveries may be diverted to another such a requirement would allow a co With respect to milk so diverted there pool plant and still receive the price ap operative sufficient time to make other ordinarily is a significant saving in the plicable at the plant from which di arrangements for its member milk supply farm-to-plant haul as compared to de verted. If location differentials are to in the event the plant subsequently lost livering the milk to a marketing area carry out their function of equating the its pool status. plant. To price such milk at the plant order prices at the various plant loca The 50 percent route distribution re from which diverted creates undue in tions in the market, there must be pro quirement is a reasonable standard for centive to attach producer milk to the vision for recognizing a specific plant differentiating between plants that are Northwestern Ohio market for the sole location to which the milk is delivered primarily engaged in the distribution of purpose of receiving the marketing area for the purpose of applying order prices. fluid milk and those that are primarily blended price without necessarily ship This may be accomplished by pricing manufacturing plants but such require ping a substantial proportion of the milk diverted between pool plants at the ment need not be so rigid as to impede milk to the market for fluid uses. Thus, location of the plant from which diverted orderly marketing. The additional re the blend price could be reduced by the if at least 15 days’ milk production of the quirement that to be pooled a distrib attachment of milk receiving a market producer is physically received at such uting plant must also sell at least 15 per ing area price but not readily available plant or at other plants in the same or cent of its dairy farmer receipts as Class for fluid purposes in the market. Ac a higher price zone as the diverting I milk on routes in the marketing area cordingly, such incentive should be elimi plant. If more than 15 days’ production is a reasonable basis for establishing its nated by providing that producer milk is diverted to a plant in a lower price association with this market and there diverted from a pool plant to a nonpool zone than that of the diverting plant is no indication in the record that this plant shall receive a price for the location then the diverted milk should be priced requirement should be changed. of the plant to which it is physically at the plant(s) where physically re Failure of a distributing plant to meet delivered. ceived. the prescribed pooling standards could As proposed by producers, diversions to (4) The definition of “route disposi have serious consequences for producers nonpool plants within 150 miles of Toledo tion” should be clarified. As the defini as well as for any supply plant shipping would continue to be priced at the plant tion is now phrased it has not been en milk to such distributing plant. In view from which diverted. There is no basis tirely clear to the trade whether route of the high possibility that failure to meet in this market, however, for differentiat disposition is intended to include Class the 50 percent route disposition require ing between plants located less than 150 I milk that moves from a processing and ment for a given month can be in miles from Toledo and plants beyond packaging plant through an intermedi advertent, the proposed modification is that distance. The same incentive exists ate distribution point en route to resale appropriate. to associate milk with a nearby plant for or wholesale outlets. Also, clarification Since the revised provision will permit the purpose of obtaining the f.o.b. market is needed as to whether route disposition a distributing plant to continue its pool price and then diverting it to manu is to be credited to the handler process status for up to 2 consecutive months facturing facilities at which location dif ing and packaging the Class I milk in without meeting the 50 percent route dis ferentials apply even though such non cases where the milk is custom-packaged tribution requirement, interested per pool plants are within 150 miles of for another person. Also, some doubt sons could be unaware of the fact that Toledo. was raised as to whether route disposi the plant was in danger of losing its b. The order should be amended also tion includes milk that is delivered to a pool status. In this situation the corol to price producer milk diverted from one retail or wholesale customer at a plant’s lary proposal that whenever a plant drops pool plant to another at the location of loading dock. below the 50 percent requirement the the pool plant from which it is diverted. It is intended that the definition in market administrator shall make it However, a limit should be provided so as this order include Class I milk that known publicly should be adopted also. to insure that milk diverted between pool moves through a distribution point en The information thus would be available plants will be priced at the plant at route to retail or wholesale outlets but to any cooperative with members de which it is generally received. not until it is, in fact, disposed of to such livering to such plant as well as to un- Presently, producer milk diverted from outlets. For determining route disposi afifiliated producers and supply plant one pool plant to another is priced at tion the distribution point is, in effect, operators shipping milk to such plant. the second plant. The major associa an “extension” of the processing and (3) a. The order should be amendedtion requested the privilege of diverting packaging plant. Consequently, delivery to price producer milk diverted from a milk between pool plants with the milk to the distribution poiiit in itself does not pool plant to a nonpool plant at the lo priced at the plant from which it is constitute route disposition. Delivery cation of the nonpool plant to which it diverted. from the distribution point to a retail or wholesale outlet does constitute route is diverted. The association has practiced the The present order prices all producer diversion of milk within the market to disposition and such disposition is at milk diverted to nonpool plants at the achieve the most advantageous use of tributable to the processing plant of location of the pool plant from which it available milk. However, under the origin. The present definition includes Class is diverted. Producers contend that this present order when the milk must be pricing arrangement could enable pro moved to a plant in a lower-priced zone, I milk which is disposed of to retail and ducers distant from the market to en the producer whose milk is moved re wholesale customers at the dock of the hance their returns unduly at the ex ceives the lower price while producers as handler’s processing plant and Class I pense of nearby producers. a whole benefit from the action. The milk that is custom-packaged for an- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 13139 other person, provided such milk is not (6) The Class I price level should notproduction of an adequate supply of milk then moved to another milk plant. How be increased. The Class I differentials for the market. Therefore, a further ever, in view of the questions raised at should be modified, however, to com increase in the stated Class I differential the hearing, the language of the defini pensate for a change in the application should not be made at this time. tion has been modified in order to elim of location differentials. This change is The proposal of a regulated handler inate any uncertainty as to its coverage discussed in conjunction with the con that a supply-demand adjustor be devised of these types of sales. sideration of location differentials. using Northwestern Ohio production and (5) The “fluid milk product” defini The principal cooperative in the mar Class I sales figures is denied. Experi tion should not be changed except for ket proposed to retain seasonal Class I ence under the merged order has not been clarification. A regulated handler pro differentials but at higher levels. They sufficient to permit development of such posed an amendment which would ex proposed Class I differentials of $1.73 for a mechanism with any assurance of clude from Class I any milk product con August through March and $1.50 for satisfactory operation. The present taining more than 6 percent butterfat, April through July, an average increase order has been in effect only since Janu concentrated milk, all cultured prod of about 40 cents over present differen ary 1, 1965, when it was formed by the ucts except buttermilk, and eggnog. tials. The cooperative contended that merger of the Toledo and North Central With the exception of sour cream mix these amounts are necessary to halt the Ohio orders. The intervening time tures which are not labeled Grade A, recent decline in production in the mar period has not been sufficient to reflect these products presently are classified ket and to insure an adequate supply of typical production and Class I sales as Class I. The amendment was opposed milk for area consumers. patterns in the market. For example, by producers. The cooperative proposed also to re sales data were affected by the milk strike Proponent’s testimony was based pri tain the present tie to the Northeastern which occurred in May and June of 1965 marily on the competitive difficulties Ohio order Class I price on the basis that depressing Class I utilization significantly arising from the introduction in the there has been insufficient experience duripg that 2-month period. market of nondairy product substitutes with the relatively new order from which such as imitation cream and imitation to develop a supply-demand mechanism Moreover, several major revisions, in sour cream. It was noted also that some based on local production and utilization cluding changes in the marketing area, of the nearby Federal orders provide figures. pricing and pooling provisions were made Class H pricing for certain specialty Á regulated handler with plants in both when the orders were merged. The products which are priced as Class I in Toledo and Mansfield proposed a year- pooling change involved substituting a the Northwestern Ohio market. round Class I differential of $1.25. His marketwide pooling plan for the handler The order classifies as Class I all fluid purpose was to improve Class I price pooling provisions of the previous orders. milk products which require the use of alignment with competing markets which Some additional supplies have been at Grade A milk. It also fixes the class have flat Class I differentials. He further tracted to the market under the new prices at levels designed to assure an ade proposed a supply-demand adjustor order. A supply plant at Defiance, Ohio, quate supply of milk for use in such prod based on production and Class I utiliza not associated with either of the previous ucts. Milk which is in excess of the mar tion figures for the Northwestern Ohio orders, pooled under the new order in ket’s fluid needs generally is processed market. 1965. into manufactured dairy products such A regulated handler with a plant at The present tie to the Northeastern as ice cream, cottage cheese, butter, and Marion, Ohio, also supported a flat Class Ohio supply-demand adjustor provides a nonfat dry milk. The latter uses of pro I differential for the purpose of improv basis for varying the Class I price in this ducer milk are designated Class II and ing Class I price alignment with the market in response to changes in the are priced at the level of manufacturing Columbus market, pointing out that he regional supply and demand situation. grade milk since all manufactured miTk sells a high proportion of his milk in In these circumstances it would be appro products generally compete in a common competition with Columbus handlers. priate to provide additional experience market whether made from Grade A milk- In support of an increase in the Class with the new provisions, and in particu or ungraded milk. I price the cooperative stated that milk lar with marketwide pooling, before a The products included in Class I are supplies have tightened significantly in supply-demand mechanism based on those that in this market must be made the market in recent months. For the Northwestern Ohio market figures alone from milk meeting Grade A inspection first 6 months of 1966 producer receipts is developed. requirements. Applicable health regu declined an average 5.8 percent from An amendment effective July 5, 1966, lations require that such products sold this period a year earlier. During the extended the Class I price differentials in the Northwestern Ohio marketing area same 6-month period Class I sales in through March 1967, the same period for be labeled Grade A. Consequently, they creased an average of 1.7 percent from which a basic formula “floor” price was continue to require a regular supply of 1965. Because of these factors, the per established in this and other Federal Grade A milk. In this respect such prod centage of producer milk used in Class I milk orders. In view of the considera ucts are quite different from butter or averaged 5.6 percent higher for the first tion given at this hearing to the longer- other Class n products which may be 6 months of 1966 over the comparable term aspects of Class I pricing in the made from manufacturing grade milk. period in 1965.a Northwestern Ohio market, it is now To reduce the price for fluid milk prod The fact of shorter supplies in Federal appropriate to establish the revised Class ucts simply to allow handlers to compete order markets was taken into account, I price differentials from their effective more effectively with nondairy products however, in the increase in prices which date through March 1968. Interested would fail to recognize the value of the became effective July 5, 1966, in all Fed parties then would have the opportunity Grade A milk so used. Permitting Grade eral order markets. The amendment to to review the pricing provisions at a A milk to be priced at the Class II level the Northwestern Ohio order placed a public hearing on the basis of market would add to the burden on fluid milk $4 floor under the basic formula price statistics covering a period of 3 years consumers of maintaining an adequate through March 1967. It also increased under the consolidated order. milk supply for fluid requirements. the July 1966 Class I differential 22 cents. The proposal for a flat Class I price A question was raised at the hearing The increases resulting from these differential should not be adopted at this concerning the classification of milk used changes were made to encourage the time. m the production of yogurt. In this While some handlers are concerned market cultured sour cream mixtures with competition from markets where which are not labeled Grade A are classi- 1 The month of May 1966 was the latest ned and priced as Class II. Yogurt which month for which complete statistical infor flat differentials are applicable year- does not carry a Grade A label should be mation was available at the hearing. In round, there is supply competition with order to complete the analysis through the included in the same category as cultured first 6 months of 1966, official notice is the Northeastern Ohio market where o ^ cream mixtures and therefore priced taken of the price statistics of the market seasonably variable Class I pricing is at me Class n price level. administrator for June 1966. used. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13140 PROPOSED RULE MAKING outlet in one city rather than another. At the present time milk production in applicable to plants in principal cities The cooperative would be assisted in the Northwestern Ohio market is not within the market are as follows: $0.00 moving milk about within the market highly seasonal. Average daily produc for Mansfield, $—0,03 for Bucyrus, since producers would receive similar tion in the market in 1965 ranged from $—0.04 for Toledo and Marion, $—0.07 prices regardless of the destination of a high of 1,041 pounds in May to a low for Findlay and $—0.09 for Lima. their milk. of 899 pounds in July, about a 16 per The farms of most producers who regu Such an amendment should not make cent change. However, producers testi larly supply handlers in each of the it more difficult for handlers in the pres fied that abandoning seasonal Class I major cities in the market are located, ent higher-priced zones to obtain ade pricing without an appropriate substi however, at relatively short distances quate milk supplies. Since hauling costs tute method of encouraging continued from the plant either in the same county throughout the market are fairly level production could change the sea as the plant or in an adjacent county. similar and available supplies of milk sonal production pattern and cause other The distances to market outlets for most are quite evenly distributed throughout marketing problems for producers and producers do not differ greatly. Hauling rates on most of the producer milk di the counties of the marketing area, loca iiRndIcrSt tion adjustments within the marketing In all other markets competing for rect-shipped to the principal cities thus are very similar. area should not be necessary to insure supply there is some type of seasonal the shipment of adequate supplies of production incentive plan in operation % As plants expand their area of dis milk to any given segment of the area as Instituting a flat Class I price differen tribution, there is an increasing amount compared to other segments. It is in the tial in Northwestern Ohio without a of route competition that has little rela interest of the cooperative and the pro method of varying producer returns tionship with the pattern of location ducers to see that all handlers receive seasonally could result in uniform prices adjustments. The routes of handlers sufficient milk for their Class I needs. in Northwestern Ohio being unduly out in the several pricing zones now overlap extensively throughout the marketing It was contended that there would be of line with uniform prices in nearby no incentive under the new provision for markets during some part of each year. area. Toledo handlers, for example, dis tribute milk in the Lima and Findlay producers to ship their milk to Mansfield The evidence in this record does not sup on the eastern edge of the market to sup port the adoption of any alternate plan area in competition with handlers who purchase Class I milk 3 to 5 cents per ply any handler in that city who became for adjusting blend prices seasonally. short of milk. This should not create a (7) a. The location adjustment prohundredweight less than the price ap plicable at Toledo. With the passage problem since there are farm milk routes visions should be modified to establish originating in the area southeast of Tole identical price levels in the first five of uniform health regulations in the va rious cities in the marketing area on do which could be directed to this zones where location adjustments from area without an increase in hauling costs zero up to 9 cents now apply. To July 1, 1966, this interhandler competi tion may be expected to intensify. to the producers involved. accomplish the change in the location The area to which similar Class I and differential rates without changing the The problem of the cooperative in assigning milk among handlers in ac blend prices should apply under the re average Class I price for the market, the vised order provisions is slightly differ stated Class I price differentials (to ap cordance with their needs has been most acute in the Lima area where the $—0.09 ent from that proposed by producers. ply throughout the marketing area) Producers proposed that the same prices should be reduced 4 cents (from $1.36 to location adjustment prevails. Last fall when milk supplies shortened, certain apply to all plants in the marketing $1.32 in August through March and from area rather than in the 18 counties in $1.13 to $1.09 in April through July). Lima handlers, needed additional milk. The cooperative, which allocates some cluded in the five price zones previously The principal cooperative proposed to discussed, an area which does not pre eliminate all location adjustments for 85 percent of the milk supplies in the market, moved to assign additional pro cisely coincide with the marketing area. plants located within the marketing area. Under the revision similar prices will pre As part of this proposal, the cooperative ducers to these handlers on a temporary basis. However, the producers to be vail throughout the 18 counties in order would eliminate the city of Napoleon as to preserve intramarket price align a basing point for computing location shifted, who normally supply plants in higher-priced zones, were reluctant to ment. At least one regulated plant and adjustments to apply to plants located two or more partially regulated plants outside the marketing area. accept the lower net return from ship ping milk to the Lima area. are located near the market but in coun They gave two primary reasons for ties which are not included in the mar eliminating location adjustments within Also, Lima handlers have had some dif ficulty in holding their regular supplies keting area. Prices applicable to these the marketing area. First, it would plants would not be appropriately aligned facilitate the shifting of milk from plants of producer milk in competition with Toledo handlers. Lima and Toledo han with those at nearby plants located in in one pricing zone to plants in other side the marketing area if the same prices zones to meet handlers’ demands for bot dlers compete for supplies in the inter did not apply in all 18 counties. tling milk. They stated that it has vening counties. Their procurement areas overlap, for example, in Hancock, As proposed by producers, the city of been difficult to move milk from plants Napoleon, Ohio, should be eliminated as in the higher-priced zones to those in Putnam and Henry Counties which lie between the two cities. a basing point for computing location lower-priced zones within the marketing adjustments for plants located beyond area on a regular basis because the pro The Toledo blend price is 5 cents higher than at Lima. Yet in much of this inter the 18-county area. Under the present ducers affected have been reluctant to order, four cities serve as basing points. accept the resulting lower net return for vening area, hauling costs are very simi They are, in addition to Napoleon, To their milk. Also, it would provide simi lar, generally about 30 cents per hun dredweight, whether the milk is hauled ledo, Lima, and Marion. lar prices to handlers who compete The cities which are retained as bas throughout the marketing area for bot to Toledo or Lima, making the net re turn to producers shipping to Lima plants ing points are the largest urban centers tled milk sales. in the market. Handlers in these cities A Lima, Ohio, handler opposed changes about 5 cents lower. The added amount afforded them under the location adjust are those most likely to receive supplies in the location adjustment provisions. of milk additional to regular producer He contended that the present zone lo ment schedule has enabled Toledo han deliveries from the farm. It is appro cation adjustments are necessary to in dlers to solicit producers from the Lima priate, therefore, to compute location sure that an adequate supply of milk handlers. adjustments from these points. is shipped to handlers in the northern The milk procurement problems of the handlers in the lower-priced zones may The latter revision will provide an ap and eastern portions of the market. He propriate location adjustment for tne said that his plant, which is located in be remedied by establishing the same market’s only supply plant which is lo the $—0.09 zone, has been able to ob blend price for the five zones within the cated at Defiance, Ohio. Presently tms tain an adequate supply of milk under market. This would tend to equate net returns to all producers who supply han plant receives a $0.03 location adjus the present provisions. ment based on its distance from Napo The present location adjustment pro dlers in the major cities in the market. There would be little price incentive leon. With this location adjustment tne visions divide the marketing area into milk is priced only $0.03 below the To- five zones. The location adjustments for the individual producer to prefer an FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966- PROPOSED RULE MAKING 13141 ledo level. Under the new provision, the country from farm pickup tanks to larger plant should be considered as part of the located adjustment for this plant will be tank trucks facilitates the economical operations of such plant. To reduce computed on the basis of its distance handling and movement of such milk problems of identification and account from Lima (the closest basing point). where substantial distances are involved. ing any reload point located on the prem It will receive a location adjustment of Such milk has a high degree of mobility ises of a pool plant should be considered about $0.075 which should be more in and may be delivered to a plant in the as part of such plant’s operation. The line with the cost of moving milk to the marketing area or at times to other handler operating the pool plant which market. plants distantly located from the mar receives milk through a reload point The average Class I price (taking into keting area. should be the responsible person under consideration the present value of loca The function of a reload point approxi the reporting and payment provisions tion differential adjustments within the mates that of a supply plant in that milk with respect to milk so received. marketing area) is approximately 4 cents is assembled at such place for movement Since the purpose of defining a reload per hundredweight less than the an to the market. It serves for a distrib point is to provide a location adjustment nounced Class I price f.o.b. Mansfield. uting plant an essential function that is on milk assembled for movement to dis With a single Class I price applicable customarily performed by a supply plant. tributing plants, the definition adopted throughout the 18 counties, it is appro However, facilities at a reload point do excludes any reloading operation that priate to reduce the stated Class I differ not have the permanence of a supply takes place within the area to which entials by a like^mount in order to main plant since they are only for the transfer the f.o.b. market price applies. tain total producer returns at their same of milk from farm pickup tank trucks to (8) a. The order should be amended level. larger tank trucks. Reload operations to provide that a handler’s regular The proposed Class I price f.o.b. market do not have the- full line of receiving monthly report of receipts and utiliza will be the same as the Class I price which facilities and holding tanks that supply tion must be postmarked no later than now applies at Toledo. Since a major plants must have. Hence, they cannot the 6th day of the month if mailed, or, if portion of the milk is priced at the To be expected to perform as a supply plant otherwise delivered, be actually received ledo Class I price level, the relationship in all respects and consequently should at the market administrator’s office no of the Northwestern Ohio Class I price not be treated for all order purposes on later than the close of business on the with Class I prices in surrounding mar the same basis as supply plants. 7th day of the month. The date for the kets will not change significantly. The The nature of the assembly function announcement of the uniform price for change in location pricing therefore, as described and the mobility factor, the preceding month should be changed should not disrupt intermarket price however, make reloaded milk appropri from the 12th to the 11th day of the alignment. ately subject to. location pricing in this current month, and payments to pro b. Provision also should be made to market. Providing for the reload point, ducers should be advanced to the 16th define a “reload point” at which a loca as well as the supply plant, to be the day of the current month. Presently tion adjustment would apply with re point of pricing will promote uniformity the uniform price is announced by the spect to milk transferred at such point of treatment to all producers similarly 12th of the month and payments to pro from one bulk tank truck to another in situated. ducers are due by the 17th day of the the course of movement from the farm Moreover, distant whole milk brought month. to a milk plant. in for Class n purposes should cost the Producers proposed that handlers be The principar cooperative proposed a handler approximately the Class n , or required to submit their monthly reports definition of “reload point” for the pur manufacturing, price at the point of ori of receipts and utilization to the market pose of providing location adjustments gin plus the cost of transporting the milk administrator no later than the 5th day on all bulk tank milk assembled and re to the market for processing. This is of the month (excluding Sundays) rather loaded at outlying locations. By this the case with respect to milk for Class II than the 7th as now provided. They means milk received at a reload pointy purchased from a supply plant in a loca further proposed that the date for an from farm tanks and assembled with tion price zone. However, since the out nouncing the uniform price and the date other similar milk, to be shipped in larger lying bulk tank producer currently re for paying producers be moved up 2 days. tank trucks to pool or nonpool plants, ceives the uniform price f.o.b. marketing Their purpose was to achieve an advance would be treated, for pricing purposes, area even when his milk is handled in the date producers receive payment in a manner similar to milk received at through a reload point, he normally pays for their milk. The proposals were op a pool supply plant in a location differen the full hauling cost to market regard posed by handlers. tial zone. less of final use made of the milk by the Producers understandably desire to Proponent pointed out that under re handler. receive full payment for their milk as cently adopted Ohio health regulations, The purchasing handler therefore may early as possible. However, the process standards have been established for in be provided a significant advantage on of preparing and submitting monthly stallations at which such intertruck distant milk so assembled for Class n reports to the market administrator and transfers of bulk tank milk may be made. purposes as compared to the handler the time necessarily consumed in com These include, among other things, a buying distant milk through a country puting the uniform price are limiting covered building, cement floor, tight supply plant for similar use. This occurs factors in any advance in the producer walls, and tank washing facilities. because the handler buying from a sup payment dates. Health inspection of the milk will be ply plant is not allowed location credit Under the producers’ proposal han made at the transfer point. Identifica from the pool on milk for Class n use dlers would be required to file receipts tion of the reload location and the oper and utilization reports 2 days earlier ator thereof are required. but only on such milk shipped to market and allocated to Class I under normal than is now required. Handlers testi While milk is considered direct- allocation procedures. Establishing the fied that reporting by the 5th day of shipped when brought into the pool dis reload point as the point of pricing would the month would be difficult, if not im tributing plant in the farm pickup tank, reduce the incentive to move distant milk possible, to comply with. This would be it was contended that the conditions of to market for Class II use at producer particularly true, they stated, when a transfer make the assembly function of expense and promote uniformity of prices weekend or a holiday occurs during the the reload point very similar to that pro to handlers. Also, uniform prices to pro first 5 days of the month, as frequently vided by any receiving station or country happens. Plant. ducers would be enhanced since milk moved through the reload point and so The hearing disclosed that the market Milk moved to the marketing area used would be priced at the reload point administrator could announce the uni * a reload point should be priced and the consequent savings on- transpor form price earlier than the 12th of the at the location of the reload point. tation as to the Class II portion of such month if all handlers’ reports were Bulk tank handling methods permit milk would be reflected in the uniform actually received by the 7th day of the month. While there was no suggestion delivery of milk to distributing plants at price. that handlers have been lax in meeting ^vms without receipt at an intermediate It was proposed that any reload point their reporting obligation, it neverthe Plant. Transfer of producer milk in the located on or at the premises of a pool less is likely that reports mailed on the FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 No. 197----- 5 13142 PROPOSED RULE MAKING ment a low utilization handler might be extent that the suggested findings and 7th, as presently permissible, will not conclusions filed by interested parties reach the market administrator’s office required to pay producers more than the classification value of the first 15 days’ are inconsistent with the findings and until at least the following day, tend conclusions set forth herein, the requests ing to cut down the time available to milk supply. They were concerned also that such an overpayment might result to make such findings or reach such con compute the uniform price. clusions are denied for the reasons pre Provision that handlers’ reports must because of money owed the handler by the producer for the purchase of sup viously stated in this decision. be postmarked no later than the 6th day During the course of the hearing of the month if mailed, or actually re plies and equipment. At the partial payment rate proposed counsel for a group of milk distributors ceived by the market administrator no not regulated by the order requested that later than the 7th day of the month if herein it would be extremely unlikely that any pool distributing plant’s utili official notice be taken of certain portions otherwise delivered, should put little, if of the record of the original promulga any, additional burden on handlers. It zation would be such that this could occur. Based on average prices for tion hearing on the Northwestern Ohio will assist, however, in insuring that all marketing order held in February 1964. such reports will be in the market ad 1965, a plant’s utilization would have to be substantially below 50 percent Class Such hearing was concerned, in part, ministrator’s office on the 7th, allowing with the proposed inclusion of the four sufficient time to compute and announce I to result in a partial payment of more than the actual value of the milk at the additional counties proposed for inclu the uniform price 1 day earlier. This sion in the marketing area. Following will make it possible to move ahead by order’s class prices. In view of the or der’s 50 percent route distribution re objection, the Hearing Examiner denied 1 day the dates for payment to pro official notice as to any part of the evi ducers and cooperative associations. quirement for such plants to qualify as pool plants the proposed provision should dence of such hearing, but indicated that Corollary changes are made in other the request for official notice was in the payment sections of the order so as to present no difficulty in this regard. It should be noted also that at the time record and subject to consideration by conform to the earlier announcement the Department. of the uniform price. Such changes in the partial payment is made the re mainder of the month’s milk supply will From review of the colloquy on this clude the dates for payments in and out matter it is concluded that the ruling of of the producer-settlement fund and for have been delivered and the amount of the partial payment on the first 15 days’ the Hearing Examiner was appropriate payment of administrative and market in the circumstances and such ruling is ing service assessments. milk supply will fall far short of the ac tual value of the full month’s deliveries. affirmed. b. The order should be amended to Same counsel also offered in evidence provide a partial payment to producers Partial payment should not be re quired, however, in instances where the a letter containing aggregate sales figures at not less than the uniform price for of unregulated distributors made in the the preceding month minus 75 cents for producer has discontinued shipping to a handler during the month. At the date four counties proposed for inclusion in milk delivered during the first 15 days the marketing area. Following an ob of the month. The partial payment of partial payment there could be con siderable uncertainty as to the exact jection, the letter was ruled inadmissible rate should also be adjusted, for the ap and an offer of proof concerning it was propriate months, by the amount of the amount due a producer who has not shipped the full month. In the latter made. seasonal change in the Class I differen The ruling of the Hearing Examiner as tial. The present order provides for a case it would be preferable to permit a handler to make final settlement in the to the admissibility of the letter in the partial payment to producers at not less circumstances is affirmed. than the Class II price for the preceding form of a single payment after the uni form price for the current month is an General findings. The findings and month. determinations hereinafter set forth are The proposal for an increase in the nounced. For timely computation of its producer supplementary and in addition to the amounts paid to producers in the form findings and determinations previously of a partial payment was submitted by payroll a cooperative association receiv ing payment from handlers on mem 'made in connection with the issuance of the major cooperative association. They the aforesaid order and of the previously stated that the present rate of partial ber milk needs information concerning daily and total pounds, and the average issued amendments thereto; and all of payment returns to the producer a rela said previous findings and determina tively low proportion of the value of the butterfat content, for each such producer prior to the date on which payment is tions are hereby ratified and affirmed, producer milk delivered during the first except insofar as such findings and de 15 days of the month, and results in received from handlers. Presently the order does not require handlers to sub terminations may be in conflict with the undue delay as to a portion of the pay findings and determinations set forth ment for such milk. mit this information before the date on which payment actually is made to the herein. Partial payments to producers, made (a) The tentative marketing agree on or before the last day of the month, cooperative. Although cooperatives ad mitted no difficulty in getting this infor ment and the order, as hereby proposed apply to milk which was delivered to to be amended, and all of the terms and handlers during the first 15 days of the mation in a timely manner, considerable month. The costs of producing such difficulty could result if it were not sub mitted prior to the payment date. the declared policy of the Act; milk have been incurred by producers, (b) The parity prices of milk as de and the milk has been sold by the han The order should be amended to re quire the submission of such information termined pursuant to section 2 of the Act dler, at least several days before any are not reasonable In view of the price payment is required. While the final in time to assure that a cooperative will be able to compute its payroll and make of feeds, available supplies of feeds, and value of such milk is not known before other economic conditions which affect the uniform price is computed, it is rea prompt payment to its members. While the cooperative requested that the in market supply and demand for milk in sonable for the producer to expect par the marketing area, and the minimum tial payment at a rate which more formation be submitted as early as the 7th of the month, they stated it was not prices specified in the proposed market nearly approaches its true value than ing agreement and the order, as hereby does the Class II price. The proposed needed quite that early in the month and would not object if the submission proposed to be amended, are such prices provision should contribute to the or as will reflect the aforesaid factors, in derly marketing of producer milk by date was made the 10th. Handlers were not opposed to the latter date. It should sure a sufficient quantity of pure ana reducing financing problems for pro wholesome milk, and be in the public ducers. be adopted. Rulings on proposed findings and con interest; and Had the proposed rate been in effect (c) The tentative marketing agree during 1965 it would have increased the clusions and motions. Briefs and pro posed findings and conclusions were filed ment and the order, as hereby proposed partial payment 25 cents per hundred to be amended, will regulate the han weight. For the first 6 months of 1966 on behalf of certain interested parties. These briefs, proposed findings and con dling of milk in the same manner as, ana it would have resulted in a 51 cents per will be applicable only to persons i hundredweight increase. clusions and the evidence in the record were considered in making the findings the respective classes of industrial an Certain handlers expressed concern commercial activity specified in, a mar- that under a higher rate of partial pay- and conclusions set forth above. To the FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 13143 keting agreement upon which a hearing milk. Cultured sour mixtures disposed § 1041.30 Reports o f receipts and utiliz has been held. of as other than sour cream and yogurt ation. Recommended marketing agreement shall be considered as fluid milk products Each handler for each of his pool and order amending the order. The fol only if disposed of under a Grade A plants, and a cooperative association with lowing order amending the order as label. The term includes these products respect to milk for which it is the han amended regulating the handling of milk in fluid, frozen (except cream ), fortified dler, shall report to the market adminis in the Northwestern Ohio marketing area or reconstituted form, but does not in trator each month. If mailed, such re is recommended as the detailed and clude sterilized products in hermetically port shall be postmarked on or before the appropriate means by which the fore sealed containers, and such products as 6th day after the end of such month; going conclusions may be carried out. milkshake mix, ice cream mix, and other or if otherwise delivered, it must be re The recommended marketing agree frozen dessert mixes, aerated cream ceived at the office of the market ad ment is not included in this decision be products, frozen cream, cultured sour ministrator on or before the 7th day after cause the regulatory provisions thereof mixtures (disposed of as other than sour the end of such month. The report shall would be the same as those contained in cream and not disposed of under a Grade be in the detail and on forms prescribed the order, as hereby proposed to be A label), pancake mixes, and evaporated by the market administrator and shall amended: or sweetened condensed milk, or skim reflect the quantities of skim milk and 1. Section 1041.13(a) is revised tomilk in either plain or sweetened form. read as follows : butterfat contained in: 3. Section 1041.18 is revised to read as ***** § 1041.13 Pool plant. follows: 7. In § 1041.51, the introductory text * ♦ * * * § 1041.18 Route disposition. and subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) (a) A distributing plant with route are revised to read as follows: disposition during the month, or in 5 of “Route disposition” means a delivery (including disposition from a plant § 1041.51 Class prices. the immediately preceding 6 months, * * * * * of not less than 50 percent of the total store, vendor, or vending machine) of Grade A milk received at such plant from Class I milk pursuant to § 1041.41(a) at (a ) Class I milk price. For the period dairy farmers (excluding any such milk retail or wholesale either directly or from the effective date of this paragraph received by diversion from a plant through any distribution point other through March 1968, the monthly Class than a plant. at which such milk is fully subject to I milk price shall be the basic formula pricing and pooíing under the terms and 4. A new § 1041.20 is added to read as price for the preceding month, plus the provisions of another order issued pur follows: sum of the amounts specified under sub- suant to the A ct), pool supply plants and paragraphs (1) and (2) of this para through reload points, and with at § 1041.20 Reload point. graph: (1) The amount set forth below for least 15 percent of such route disposition Reload point means any location which the applicable month, subject to adjust made within the marketing area during is outside the Ohio counties specified in ment for location pursuant to § 1041.53: the month. § 1041.53 and which is both 40 miles from * * * * * the City Hall of Toledo, Ohio, and more August through March______$1.32 April through July______$1.09 la. In §1041.15 paragraphs (a), (b), than 15 miles from the City Halls of and (c) (3) are revised to read as follows: Mansfield, Marion, and Lima, Ohio, at ***** which milk moved from the farm in a 8. Section 1041.53 is revised to read § 1041.15 Producer milk. tank truck is commingled with other such as follows: * * * * * milk before entering a plant, except that reloading operations on the premises of § 1041.53 Location adjustments to han (a) Received during the month at one a plant shall be considered to be part of dlers. or more pool plants from the producer, such plant’s operation. (a ) The price for Class I milk at a either directly or through a reload plant or reload point located outside the point, or caused to be delivered from the 5. In § 1041.27, paragraphs (g) and (j)(2 ) are revised to read as follows: Ohio Counties of Allen, Auglaize, Craw producer’s farm to a pool plant(s) by a ford, Erie, Fulton, Hancock, Hardin, cooperative association. § 1041.27 Duties. Henry, Huron, Lucas, Marion, Morrow, (b) Diverted by a handler from a pool Ottawa, Richland, Sandusky, Seneca, plant to another pool plant for any num * * * * * Wood, and Wyandot, which is both more ber of days of the month. Milk so di (g) He shall publicly announce (by than 40 miles from the City Hall of To verted shall be priced at the location posting in a conspicuous place in his ledo, Ohio, and more than 15 miles from of the plant frbm which it is diverted, office and by such means as he deems the City Halls of Mansfield, Marion, and if at least 15 days’ production of the pro appropriate), at his discretion and un Lima, Ohio, shall be the price computed ducer is delivered during the month to less otherwise directed by the Secretary, pursuant to § 1041.51(a) reduced at the such plant or to other plants at which the name of any handler with respect rate of 1.5 cents for each 10 miles or the same or a higher price applies; other to a pool plant under § 1041.13(a) from fraction thereof that such plant or re wise milk diverted to other pool plants which route disposition during the month load point is from the nearest of the City shall be priced at the plant (s) where is less than 50 percent of receipts as Halls of Toledo, Mansfield, Marion, or Physically received. specified in such paragraph, and the (c) * * * Lima, Ohio. No location adjustment name of any handler the value of whose shall apply, however, at a plant or reload (3) Milk diverted to a nonpool plantfluid milk products is not included in the point which is nearer to the Public or the account of a handler operating a computation of the uniform price be Square in Cleveland, Ohio, than the dis Pool plant or for the account of a co cause of failure to make reports pur tance between such Cleveland location suant to §§ 1041.30 and 1041.32, or pay operative association shall be priced at point and the City Hall at Mansfield, Sf. R ation of thè nonpool plant to ments pursuant to §§ 1041.80, 1041.82, Ohio. 1041.84, 1041.85, and 1041.86. which diverted. (b) For purposes of calculating loca ***** tion adjustments to handlers, receipts of S e c t i o n 1041.16 is revised to read as (j) * * * fluid milk products from pool plants and (2) By the 11th day after the end of reload points shall be assigned to Class § 1041.16 Fluid milk product. each month, the uniform price computed I disposition at the transferee plant in pursuant to § 1041.71 and the butter- excess of the sum of receipts at such ntflk product” means milk, «Mm fat differential computed pursuant to plant directly from producers and the m-it’ ®avored or cultured milk or skim § 1041.72. volume assigned as Class I to receipts n ’ buttermilk, concentrated milk, egg- * * * * * from other order plants and unregu og, sweet or sour cream, and any mix- lated supply plants. Such assignment 6. The introductory text of § 1041.30 ure of fluid cream and milk or skim shall be made first to transferor plants is revised to read as follows: at which no location adjustment credit FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13144 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 13. In § 1041.85 paragraph (a) is re is applicable and then in sequence be Payment to producers shall be completed vised to read as follows: ginning with the plant or reload point thereafter not later than the date for at which the least location adjustment making payments pursuant to this par § 1041.85 Marketing service deductions. agraph next following receipt of the would apply. (a) In making the payments required balance due from the market adminis (c) For the purpose of this section by § 1041.80 (a) (2) and (b) to producers, and § 1041.73, the distances to be com trator; and other than payments to himself and to puted shall be on the basis of the short * * * * * any producer who is a member of a co est hard-surfaced highway distances as (c) In making payments for producer operative association which the Secre determined by the market administra milk pursuant to this section, each han tary determines is performing the serv tor. dler shall furnish a supporting state ices specified in paragraph (b) of this 9. In § 1041.73, paragraph (a) is re ment to each producer, or cooperative section, each handler shall deduct 6 cents vised to read as follows: association in the case of member pro per hundredweight, or such lesser ducers for whom payment is made pur amount as the Secretary shall determine § 1041.73 Location differentials to pro suant to paragraph (b) of this section. to be sufficient, for marketing services. ducers and on nonpool milk. Such statement shall be furnished at The handler shall pay the amount de (a) For the purposes of § 1041.80, the the time payments are made pursuant ducted to the market administrator on uniform price at a plant or a reload point to this section, except that the informa or before the 13th day after the end of may be reduced on the basis of the ap tion included in subparagraphs (1) and the month. plicable amount or rate for the loca (2) of this paragraph shall be furnished * * * * * a cooperative association for whom payr tion of such plant or reload point pur 14. Section 1041.86 is revised to read ment is made pursuant to paragraph (b) suant to § 1041.53; as follows: * * * * * of this section on or before the 10th day after the end of the month during which § 1041.86 Expense o f administration. 10. In § 1041.80, paragraph (a) (1) the producer milk was received. The and (2) and the introductory text of par On or before the 13th day after the supporting statement shall be in such agraph (c) are revised to read as follows: end of each month, each handler shall form that it may be retained by the re make payment to the market admistra- § 1041.80 Time and method o f payment. cipient and shall show: tor as his pro rata share of the expense of (a ) * * * ***** administration of this part. The pay (1) On or before the last day of each H ; The introductory text of § 1041.82 ment shall be at the rate of 3 cents per month to each producer who had not is revised to read as follows: hundredweight or such lesser amount as discontinued shipping milk to such han the Secretary may prescribe. The pay § 1041.82 Payments to the producer- ment shall apply to all of the handler’s dler during the month, at not less than settlement fund. the uniform price for the preceding receipts during the month of skim milk month minus 75 cents, adjusted by any On or before the 13th day after the and butterfat contained in (a) producer . amount that the Class I differential pur end of the month each handler shall pay milk (including a handler’s own farm suant to § 1041.51(a) for the preceding to the market administrator the amount, production); and (b) other source milk month is greater or lesser than such dif if any, by which the total amounts spec at a pool plant which is allocated to Class ferential for the current month, for the ified in paragraph (a) of this section I milk pursuant to § 1041.46 (a) (3), producer milk received during the first exceed the amounts specified in para (a )(7 ) and the corresponding steps of 15 days of the month: graph (b) of this section: § 1041.46(b). The payment shall apply (2) On or before the 16th day after * * * * * also to the quantity of route disposition the end of each month, at not less than 12. Section 1041.83 is revised to read as in the marketing area during the month of other source milk from a partially the uniform price adjusted pursuant to follows: §§ 1041.72, 1041.73, and 1041.85, less any regulated distributing plant that ex payment made pursuant to subpara § 1041.83 Payment out o f the producer- ceeds Class I milk received during the graph (1) of this paragraph, for pro settlement fund. month at such plant from pool plants ducer milk received during such month. On or before the 14th day after the and other order plants. If by such date the handler has not re end of each month the market adminis Signed at Washington, D.C., on Octo ceived full payment from the market trator shall pay to each handler the ber 6,1966. R o y W . L e n n a r t so n , administrator pursuant to § 1041.83 for amount, if any, by which the amount Associate Administrator. such month, he may reduce pro rata his computed pursuant to § 1041.82(b) ex [F.R. Doc. 66-11050; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; payments to producers by not more than ceeds the amount computed pursuant to 8:49 a.m.] the amount of such underpayment. § 1041.82(a). FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13145 Notices 3. Actual conduct of feasibility studies turn receipt requested, so that a record POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT leading to a management decision about will be available of the applicant’s receipt modernizing or improving master filing of the decision letter. The applicant ZIP CODE REGULATIONS systems and/or leading to a management should be advised that any appeal to the Presorting of Bulk Second- and decision to order additional or new Department should be directed to the O f equipment (if applicable). fice of the Assistant Postmaster General, Third-Class Mail 4. Current action to include ZIP Code Bureau of Operations, giving his specific The following is an excerpt from a in addresses included in new customer reasons why he feels the additional time Circular Letter to the Regional Directors records, change transactions, etc. should be granted. signed by the Assistant Postmaster Gen Latitude is given to Regional Directors B. To postmaster. Copies of all deci eral, Bureau of Operations, on September in fixing times to be approved or dis sion letters should be sent to the postmas 20, 1966, to provide guidance to the approved, to increase such times not to ter where mailings are entered. Regional Offices in processing applica totally exceed 1 year or to decrease such For second-class mail, a copy of the tions filed by second- or third-class bulk times under the following conditions: decision letter should be sent to the post rate mail users for additional time to Increase. (1) The times may be in master where the publication has original comply with mandatory ZIP Code pre creased where substantial efforts have entry and that postmaster should be in sorting regulations effective January 1, been made in excess of the above, such structed to notify postmasters at other 1967, and to provide the criteria to deter as cooperation in voluntarily ZIP Coding offices where additional entries, if any, mine whether an applicant should be address records between July 1,1963, and are made. deemed to have made substantial and February 2, 1965, and the degree of such For third-class mail, a copy of the Re good faith efforts to bring his mailings voluntary cooperation. (2) Actual addi gional decision letter should be sent to into compliance: tions of personnel or expenditure of the postmaster where the applicant significant funds because of ZIP Coding. makes third-class mailings covered by I. Cr it e r ia T o B e U sed b y R e g io n a l (3) Delays beyond the control of the ap each application. D irectors i n C o n s id e r in g A p p l ic a plicant where his ZIP Coding work was * * * * * tio ns fo r A d d it io n a l T im e T o C o m p l y contracted to a service bureau or other W it h Z i p C ode P r e s o r t in g R e q u ir e party. (4) Any time consumed while (5 U.S.C. 301, 39 U.S.C. 501) m e n ts B e c o m in g E f f e c t iv e J a n u a r y 1, waiting for address cards to be returned 1967 T im o t h y J. M a y , from post offices when submitted to post General Counsel. In issuing the regulations requiring office for ZIP sorting. presorting to ZIP Codes of bulk second Decrease. The times may be decreased O cto ber 6,1966. e d third-class mail and controlled (1) where the “good faith” efforts are [F.R. Doc. 66-11021; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; circulation publications which become lesser than the minimum specified, and 8:46 a.m.J effective January 1,1967, the Department (2) where the circumstances are such has provided that mailers may be granted that the principal reason for inability of appropriate extensions of time to come the applicant to be ready for compliance FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM into compliance with the new require on January 1, 1967, was his failure to ments. (See notes following present initiate action to ZIP Code address files OHIO CITIZENS TRUST CO. §§ 16.3(b) (9) and 24.4(b) (7) of Title 39, within a reasonable time after July 2, Code of Federal Regulations.) The 1965, when the proposed ZIP Coding and Order Approving Application for regulations require that to “obtain an presorting requirements were actually Merger of Banks extension, the mailer must show that (1) published as final regulations. In the matter of the application of he is unable without undue hardship and The Ohio Citizens Trust Co. for approval II. N otification o f D e c is io n for causes not reasonably within his con of merger with The Whitehouse State trol to achieve compliance with these A. To applicant— 1. Approval. If an Savings Bank. regulations and (2) he has made a sub applicant’s request is granted in full, he There has come before the Board of stantial and good faith effort to bring need not be informed in detail of the rea Governors, pursuant to the Bank Merger his mailings into compliance with these sons why the request was granted, but Act, as amended (12 U.S.C. 1828(c), regulations.” The mailer’s request in merely should be sent a brief letter of Public Law 89-356), an application by writing for an extension, accompanied approval. The approval letter should The Ohio Citizens Trust Co., Toledo, with supporting documentation, must be contain language specifically stating (a) Ohio, a State member bank of the Fed submitted to the postmaster Where mail- the exact period for which the additional eral Reserve System, for the Board’s S g are made. The postmaster will time is granted, and (b) the location and prior approval of the merger of that submit the request to his Regional Di type of mailings to which the extension bank and The Whitehouse State Savings rector for a decision. applies. Bank, Whitehouse, Ohio, under the Regional Directors will apply the fol 2. Denial. On the other hand, if ancharter and title of The Ohio Citizens lowing criteria in their consideration of applicant’s request is denied, either in Trust Co. As an incident to the merger, applications for extensions of time: whole or in part, then he should be in the main office and branch of The White- L Use of ZIP in stationery1", forms, formed in some detail why his request house State Savings Bank would become coupons, etc. was so denied. Unless the applicant is branches of the resulting bank. Notice 2. Tangible efforts made subsequent to given such reasons, he would not be able of the proposed merger, in form ap Jebruary 2,1965, to ZIP Code address and to intelligently frame an appeal. proved by the Board, has been published master mailing files. Such files must be A letter of denial, either in whole or pursuant to said Act. Percent ZIP Coded by Janu- in part, should also advise the applicant Upon consideration of all relevant ma 1967. This 50 percent criterion is that he may appeal the Regional Direc terial in the light of the factors set forth waived where Items 1, 3, and 4 are being tor’s decision to the Post Office Depart in said Act, including reports furnished lowed and the applicant qualifies for ment Headquarters, 12th and Pennsyl by the Comptroller of the Currency, the because he is awaiting de- vania Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, n] . jf oi new equipment from which corn- 20260, within 15 calendar days following and the Attorney General on the com created*^ ac^ ress records are to be receipt of the decision letter. Letters of petitive factors involved in the proposed denial should be sent certified mail, re merger, FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13146 NOTICES It is hereby ordered, For the reasons Refuge or range County Study area Acreage set forth in the Board’s Statement1 of this date, that said application be and Judicial division hereby is approved, provided that said Alaska: merger shall not be consummated (a) Aleutian Islands______2,600,000 Arctic.....______... 8,900,000 before the 30th calendar day following Bering Sea..:______... 41,113 the date of this order, or (b) later than B ogoslof.------i 390 Cham isso______641 3 months after said date. Clarence Rhode...... 1,870,016 Forrester Island______2,832 Dated at Washington, D.C., this 4th Hazen B ay______- ______6,800 day of October 1966. Hazy Islands______42 Izem bek ______372,000 By order of the Board of Governors.8 Andrew Simon______830,000 Moose River______140,000 Kodiak______1,815,000 ; [ s e a l ] M e r r it t S h e r m a n , Nunivak______1,109,000 Secretary. St. Lazaria______65 Semidi______... ------8,422 jp.R. Doc. 66-11016; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; Simeonof...... 10,442 8:46 a.m.] Tuxedni______6,439 Arizona: Cabeza Prieta______860,000 Needles.. ______1 11,261 Castle Dome______228,224 K ofa...... 140,416 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR California: Farallon______- 91 Fish and Wildlife Service Florida: ^ t «mm Caloosahatchee______20 Cedar Keys______— 379 NATIONAL WILDERNESS PRES Great White Heron______796 ERVATION SYSTEM Island Bay______20 Key West...... — 2,019 Matlacha Pass...... —...... 10 Notice of Areas Within National Wild Passage K ey______36 life Refuge System That Qualify for Pelican Island------616 Pine Island______31 Study Georgia: Okefenokee______331,838 The Wilderness Act, Public Law 88- Tybee...... 100 Wolf Island______538 577 (78 Stat. 890), provided the authority Hawaii: and indicated the procedure by which Hawaiian Islands______1,708 Territory: lands in the National Wildlife Refuge Johnston Island.—...... - 100 System that meet the necessary require ments may be considered for inclusion Louisiana: Parish Breton------7,512 in the National Wilderness Preserva East Timbalier Island______337 8 tion System. This law directed -the • Shell Keys N W R ...... Iberia...... ------Shell K eys.—. ------study and review within 10 years after Maine: 3 Moosehorn N W R 1______Washington. Bitch Island. September 3,1964, of every roadless area Washington- Dog Island__ 3 Moosehorn N W R 1______8,200 of 5,000 contiguous acres or more and Moosehorn N W R 1______• Washington. Edmunds___ Maryland: 4,414 every roadless island within national Martin N W R ------:------Somerset— Martin______wildlife refuges and game ranges. M assachusetts: Barnstable. Monomoy Island. The President is to have the com Monomoy N W R 1______— Michigan: 147 pleted studies on one-third of the areas Huron N W R 1-----—------Marquette______Huron Island____ Alpena and Charlevoix. Michigan Island. 12 and islands to be reviewed to the Con Michigan Island N W R 1------19,150 Seney N W R 1______Schoolcraft.______Riverside____—. gress by September 3, 1967. Mississippi: Jackson...... ______Horn Island. 2,442 Accordingly, the Bureau of Sport Fish Horn Island N W R ------749 Petit Bois N W R ___. ______Jackson______Petit Bois— . eries and Wildlife has considered all Montana: 24,640 Charles Russell N W Range------Garfield- Bone T r a i l - areas in the National Wildlife Refuge Burnt Lodge- .24,782 Charles Russell N W Range— — Valley.., 8,640 System and has determined that 82 areas Charles Russell N W Range------Phillips. Devil Creek.. and islands on 67 refuges and ranges Nevada: 248 Anaho Island N W R ------—- Washoe___ Anaho Islan d ..___ qualify for study under the act and the Big Sps. T ab__ 100,000 Chas. Sheldon Antelope Range----- Humboldt. 12,200 regulations of the Secretary of the In Chas. Sheldon Antelope Range------Humboldt. Big Mountain____ Bitner Butte______18,000 Chas. Sheldon Antelope Range----- Washoe— 18,000 terior published February 22, 1966, 31 Chas. Sheldon Antelope Range----- Washoe___ Catnip Mountain. F.R. 7899. Studies of these areas and Nevada: 31,300 Chas. Sheldon Antelope Range----- Humboldt_____ Gooch Table___ Virgin Canyon- 17.500 islands by the Bureau of Sport Fisheries Chas. Sheldon Antelope Range— Hum boldt_____ 617,000 Desert N W Range______Clark, Lincoln. Desert Bighorn. and Wildlife will be followed by public N ew Jersey: M. Hartley Dodge. 2,000 hearings, which will be announced in Great Swamp N W R 1------Morris______N ew Mexico: 11,900 Salt C re e k ...... the F ederal R e g is t e r , in order that all Bitter Lake N W R L . —------——. Chaves____ 5,593 Bosque del Apache N W R 1. ------Socorro____ Chupadera______10,009 interested persons may express their Bosque del Apache N W R 1------Socorro___ Indian Well______22,298 Little San Pascual. Bosque del Apache N W R 1______— Socorro___ 50,100 views. San Andres N W R ______— ------Dona Ana. San Andrés______The areas and islands that qualify for Ohio: 82 West Sister Island N W R ______Lucas_____ West Sister Island.. study are as follows: Oklahoma: 5,710 Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge Comanche. Charon’s Gardens. Oregon: 22.500 1 Filed as part of the original document. Hart Mountain National Antelope Lake. Fort Warner___... Copies available upon request to the Board Refuge. 18.500 of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Hart Mountain National Antelope Lake. Poker Jim Ridge. Washington, D.C. 20551, or to the Federal Refuge.1 30,117 Malheur N W R 1______Harney___ Harney Lake------.. 48,317 Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Dissenting Malheur N W R 1------Harney___ Malheur Lake------21 statement of Governor Robertson also filed Oregon Island N W R 1______— Curry...... Oregon Island------17 as part of the original document and avail Three Arch .Rocks NW R 1— ------Tillamook. Three Arch Rocks. Texas: 9,613 able upon request. Laguna Atascosa N W R ______Cameron. Arroyo Colorado.— 2 Voting for this action: Chairman Martin Utah: 39,936 and Governors Shepardson, Mitchell, Daane, Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge Box Elder. Bear River. Maisel, and Brimmer. Voting against this action; Governor Robertson. See footnotes at end of table. FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 NOTICES 13147 tinuing need in those counties for agri Refuge or range , County Study area Acreage cultural credit not readily available from commercial banks, cooperative lending Washington: Judicial division agencies, or other responsible sources. 5 Clallam______125 Quillayute Needles N W R <...... Clallam and Jefferson...... Quillayute Needles______117 N ew York Wisconsin: Original Present designation extension Gravel Island N W R *______Door______27 Door______2 A lbany______29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Allegany____ i To be studied during the initial 3-year period. 29 F.R . 11165...... 30F.R. 11070 Broome_____ 29 F.R . 11165_____ 30F.R. 11070 N W R —National Wildlife Refuge. Cattaraugus. 30 F.R . 11070...... NW=NationaI Wildlife. C a y u ga..___ 29 F.R . 15267_____ 30 F.R . 11070 Chautauqua. 30 F.R . 11070_____ Summary Chemung___ 29F.R. 11165_____ 30 F.R . 11070 Chenango___ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Clinton_____ 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Region Number of Num ber of Num ber of Areas and Acreage Columbia___ 29 F.R . 11165_____ 30 F.R . 11070 States counties refuges islands Cortland.— . 29 F .R . 11165_____ 30 F.R . 11070 Delaware____ 29 F .R . 11165 30 F.R . 11070 Dutchess___ _ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 I...... 7 23 31 41 18,707,130 Erie...... 30 F.R . 11070...... II...... 6 10 9 12 1,395,060 E ssex ...____ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 I ll...... 3 6 6 6 19,420 Franklin____ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 IV...... 5 18 18 18 351,865 Fulton...... 29 F.R . 11165 30 F.R . 11070 V ...... 3 3 3 5 9,904 Genesee_____ 30 F.R . 11070...... Greene______29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Total...... 24 60 67 82 20,438,379 Hamilton___ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Herkimer___ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Jefferson..... 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 J o h n S. G o t t s c h a l k , Lewis______29 F.R . 11165_____ 30 F.R . 11070 Director. Livingston... 30 F.R . 11070 Madison..... 29 F.R . 11165 30 F.R . 11070 O ctober 5, 1966. Monroe_____ 30F.R. 11070_____ Montgomery. 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 [FJt. Doc. 66-11018; Filed, Oct. 10,1966; 8:46 a.m.] 'N iagara_____ 30 F.R . 11070...... Oneida____ _ 29 F.R..11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Onondaga___ 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 it to the aforesaid fertilizer manufac Ontario______30 F .R . 11070...... DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE turers.” Orange._____ 29 F.R . 13081...... 30 F.R . 11070 Orleans___... 30 F .R . 11070...... Consumer and Marketing Service The Peanut Administrative Committee Oswego______29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 has recommended that this amendment Otsego____... 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 [Marketing Agreement 146] Putnam .____ 30 F.R . 11070...... be issued as soon as possible so as to Rensselaer___ 29 F.R . 11165_____ 30 F.R . 11070 implement and effectuate the provisions Rockland____ 30 F.R . 11070...... PEANUTS St. Lawrence. 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 of the marketing agreement dealing with Saratoga_____ 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Outgoing Quality Regulation outgoing quality regulations. Marketing Schenectady. 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 of the 1966 peanut crop is underway and Schoharie____ 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 Pursuant to the provisions of sections Schuyler.___ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 1J.070 such outgoing quality regulations for Seneca______30F.R. 11070...... 32 and 34 of the marketing agreement actual operations under the agreement Steuben_____ 29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 regulating "the quality of domestically Suffolk...___ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 should therefore be modified and made Sullivan____ _ 29 F .R . 13081...... 30 F.R . 11070 produced peanuts heretofore entered effective as soon as possible, i.e., on the Tioga______29 F.R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 into between the Secretary of Agricul effective date specified herein. Handlers Tompkins___ 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F .R . 11070 ture and various handlers of peanuts Ulster...... 29 F .R . 13081 30 F.R . 11070 of peanuts who will be affected by such Warren...... 29 F .R . 11165_____ 30 F.R . 11070 (30 F.R. 9402) and upon recommenda amendment have signed the marketing Washington.. 29 F .R . 11165...... 30 F.R . 11070 tion of the Peanut Administrative Com W ayne______30 F.R . 11070_____ agreement authorizing the issuance of Westchester.. 30 F.R . 11070...... mittee established pursuant to such such regulations, they are represented on W yom ing___ 30 F.R . 11070...... Yates______29 F.R . 11165 30 F.R . 11070 agreement and other information it is the Committee which recommended such hereby found that the amendment here amendments, and time does 'not permit inafter set forth to the Outgoing Quality prior notice of the proposed amendment Pursuant to the authority set forth Regulation (31 F.R. 8601) will tend to to such handlers. above, emergency loans will not be made effectuate the objectives of the Agri The foregoing amendment of the Out in the above-named counties after June cultural Marketing Agreement Act of going Quality Regulation is hereby ap 30, 1967, except to applicants who previ 1937, as amended, and of such agree ously received emergency or special live ment. proved and issued this 6th day of Octo ber 1966 to become effective October 6, stock loan assistance and who can Amendment of the Outgoing Quality 1966. qualify under established policies and Regulation is necessary to allow export F l o y d F. H e d l u n d , procedures. ers who purchase restricted peanut meal Director, Fruit and Vegetable an opportunity to also sell it to licensed Done at Washington, D.C., this 5th day Division, Consumer and Mar of October 1966. or registered U.S. fertilizer manufac keting Service. turers for nonfeed use. Previously han O r v ill e L. F r e e m a n , [F.R. Doc. 66-11047; Filed, Oct. Ì0, 1966; dlers were permitted to sell restricted Secretary. Peanut meal to such exporters only if 8:48 a.m.] [F.R. Doc. 66-11025; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; the meal was to be exported for nonfeed 8:47 a.m.] U^n‘ .^•owever> the exporting firms also Office of the Secretary sell domestically and should be per mitted to so sell the meal and provide NEW YORK TEXAS AND COLORADO J|n<*ustry with additional outlets. ' Therefore, the penultimate sentence of Extension of Designation of Areas for Designation and Extension of Areas Paragraph (g), subparagraph (3) of the Emergency Loans for Emergency Loans Quality Regulation (31 F.R. For the purpose of making emergency For the purpose of making emergency , " , ls deleted and replaced by the fol- loans pursuant to section 321 of the Con loans pursuant to section 321 of the Con ,rr° Prevent use of restricted solidated Farmers Home Administration solidated Farmers Home Administration not for *eet*> handlers shall either de- Act of 1961 (7 U.S.C. 1961), it has been Act of 1961 (7 U.S.C. 1961), it has been " a„.ufe or restrict its sale to licensed or determined that in the hereinafter- determined that in the hereinafter- n/fl re^ tJ.S. fertilizer manufacturers named counties in the State of New York named county in the State of Texas a engaged in exporting who will the disasters for which such counties are natural disaster has caused a need for Port such meal for nonfeed use or sell presently designated have caused a con agricultural credit not readily available FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13148 NOTICES 3. Exercise the powers under section from commercial banks, cooperative under section A, and authorize further 402 (a) of the Housing Act of 1950, as lending agencies, or other responsible redelegation to employees within the amended (12 U.S.C. 1749a(a)). sources. respective Regions of any of the au T exas thority so redelegated. 4. Sue and be sued. Presidio. 2. Redelegate to headquarters employ 5. Issue rules and regulations. ees any of the authority delegated under (Secretary’s delegation effective May 18,1966, It has also been determined that in sections A, 3, with respect to the Urban 31 FJR. 7359, May 20, 1966, as amended at 31 the hereinafter-named county in the Mass Transportation Programs, and F.R. 13148, Oct. 11,1966) State of Colorado natural disasters have authorize further redelegation to em caused a continuing need for agricultural Effective date. These amendments of ployees under the jurisdiction of the As credit not readily available from com redelegations of authority are effective sistant Secretary for Metropolitan mercial banks, cooperative lending as of May 18,1966. agencies, or other responsible sources. Development. (3) By adding the following new sec C h a r le s M. H aar, • tions D and E : Assistant Secretary for Colorado Original designa- Present Metropolitan Development. tlOJl extension Sec. D. Additional authority delegated to Assistant Secretary for Metropolitan [F.R. Doc. 66-11045; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; Development. The Assistant Secretary 8:48 a.m.] 29 F.R . 15876— — 30 F.R . 8282 for Metropolitan Development is further authorized to: Pursuant to the authority set forth 1. Issue such rules and regulations as above, emergency loans will not be made may be necessary to carry out the power CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD in the above-named counties after June delegated herein. [Docket No. 17613] 30, 1967, except to applicants who pre 2. With respect to employees or posi viously received emergency or special tions under his jurisdiction: ALOHA AND HAWAIIAN SHOW livestock loan assistance and who can a. Designate one or more employees to CAUSE ORDER qualify under established policies and serve as Acting Assistant Secretary for procedures. Metropolitan Development during the Notice of Postponement of Done at Washington, D.C., this 5th day absence of such Assistant Secretary, or Prehearing Conference of October 1966. to serve as acting head of an organiza Notice is hereby given that the pre- tional unit during the absence of the head O r v ill e L . F r e e m a n , hearing conference in the above-entitled Secretary. of the unit or during a vacancy in the matter now assigned to be held on No position. vember 1 is postponed to November 14, (F.R. Doc. 66-11026; Piled, Oct. 10, 1966; b. Authorize the head of an organiza 1966, 10 a.m., e.s.t., Room 911, Universal 8:47 a.m.] tional unit to designate one or more Building, 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., subordinate employees to serve as acting Washington, D.C., before Associate Chief head of such unit during the absence of Examiner Thomas L. Wrenn. the head of the unit, or to serve in an “Acting” capacity in any other posi Dated at Washington, D.C., October 5, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND tion in the unit during the absence of 1966. the appointee to such position or during [ s e a l ] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , URBAN DEVELOPMENT a vacancy in such position. Chief Examiner. S e c . E. Existing delegations and redel Office of the Secretary [F.R. Doc. 66-11033; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; egations. Notwithstanding the delega 8:47 a.m.] ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR METRO tions herein and redelegations hereun POLITAN DEVELOPMENT AND DEP der, delegations to Regional Administra [Docket No. 17738] UTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR tors and redelegations thereunder in effect on May 17, 1966, with respect to BABY POULTRY RATES METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT the programs and matters listed herein Delegations of Authority continue in effect until expressly modified Notice of Prehearing Cönference or revoked. The Secretary’s delegations of author Increased rates on baby poultry pro ity to the Assistant Secretary for Metro Effective date. These amendments of posed by American Airlines, Inc., Con politan Development and the Deputy delegations of authority are effective as tinental Air Lines, Inc., Trans W o rld m r- Assistant Secretary for Metropolitan of May 18,1966. lines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc. (See Development effective May 18, 1966 (31 order E-24210, dated Sept. 22,1966.) F.R. 7358, May 20, 1966), are hereby R o bert C. W eaver, Notice is hereby given that a prehear amended in the following respects: Secretary of Housing and ing conference in the above-entitled mat (1) Under section B, by revising sub Urban Development. ter is assigned to be held on October 24, section 3 and adding new subsections [F.R. Doc. 66-11042; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 1966, at 10 a.m., e.d.s.t., in Room 726, Uni 4 and 5, to read: 8:48 a.m.] versal Building, 1825 Connecticut Avenue S e c . B. Additional authority ex NW., Washington, D.C., before Examiner cepted. * * * Herbert K. Bryan. REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS AND 3. Exercise the powers under section Dated at Washington, D.C., October 5, 402(a) of the Housing Act of 1950, as DEPUTY REGIONAL ADMINISTRA 1966. amended (12 U.S.C. 1749a(a)). TORS [ s e a l ] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , 4. Sue and be sued. Chief Examiner. 5. In the case of the Deputy Assistant Redelegations of Authority Secretary for Metropolitan Develop [F.R. Doc. 66-11034; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966* ment, issue rules and regulations. The redelegations of authority by the 8:47 a.m.] (2) By revising section C to read: Assistant Secretary for Metropolitan S e c . C. Additional authority dele Development to Regional Administrators [Docket No. 17728] gated. The Assistant Secretary for and Deputy Regional Administrators Metropolitan Development and the Dep effective May. 18, 1966 (31 F.R. 7359, OZARK-CENTRAL MERGER uty Assistant Secretary for Metropoli May 20, 1966), are hereby amended un Notice of Prehearing C o n fe re n c e tan Development each is further author der section B, by revising subsection 3 ized to: and adding new subsections 4 and 5, to Notice is hereby given that a prehear 1. Redelegate to Regional Administra read: ing conference in the above-en tors and to Deputy Regional Administra S e c . B. Additional authority excepted. * * * matter is assigned to be held on Oc o tors any of the authority delegated FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 NOTICES 13149 17, 1966, at 10 a.m., e.d.s.t., in Room of June 1, 1966, the Prehearing Confer January 10, 1967, 10 a m., in the Com 911, Universal Building, 1825 Connecti ence Report served on May 16, 1966, and mission’s Offices, Washington, D.C. cut Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., be Supplemental Prehearing Conference fore Examiner Merritt Ruhlen. Report served on May 27,1966, and other Released; October 5, 1966. Under date of October 4, 1966, the documents which are in the docket of F ederal C ommunications joint applicants filed with the Board a this proceeding on file in the Docket C o m m is s io n , Preliminary Submission of the Appli Section of the Civil Aeronautics Board. [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , cants, containing extensive data with re Dated at Washington, D.C., October 5, Secretary. spect to the application. A copy of this 1966. [F.R. Doc. 66-11007; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; document was served upon interested 8:45 a.m.] parties. [ s e a l ] R o ss I. N e w m a n n , In order to facilitate the conduct of Hearing Examiner. [Docket Nos. 16700, 16701; FOC 66M-1333] the conference and expeditious handling [F.R. Doc. 66-11051; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; of this case, parties are instructed to sub 8:49 a.m.] KENTUCKY CENTRAL TELEVISION, mit to the examiner and other parties, INC. AND WBLG-TV, INC. on or before October 13, 1966, (1) pro posed statements of issues; (2) proposed Order Regarding Procedural Dates stipulations; (3) statements setting FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS In re applications of Kentucky Central forth wherein the preliminary submis Television, Inc., Lexington, Ky.; Docket sion is deficient and what additional in COMMISSION No. 16700, File No. BPCT-3569; W BLG - formation, if any, is required ; (4) state [Docket Nos. 16892,16893; FCC 66M-1331] TV, Inc., Lexington, Ky.; Docket No. ments of positions of parties including 16701, File No. BPCT-3642; for construc proposed conditions and operating re COMMUNITY COMMUNICATORS OF tion permit for new television broadcast strictions, if any; and (5) proposed pro OHIO, INC. AND DAVID JOSEPH station. cedural dates which should recognize the KITTEL Pursuant to agreement arrived at dur necessity of a prompt decision in this ing the prehearing conference in the case. Order Scheduling Hearing above-styled proceeding held on this Dated at Washington, D.C., October In re applications of Community Com date: It is ordered, This 4th day of Octo 5, 1966. municators of Ohio, Inc., Wilmington, ber 1966, that due to the recent addition of an issue by the Review Board, the pro [ seal] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , Ohio; Docket No. 16892, File No. B P H - cedural dates are rescheduled as follows: Chief Examiner. 5338; David Joseph Kittel, Wilmington, Ohio; Docket No. 16893, File No. B P H - Exchange of exhibits will be made on [F.R. Doc. 66-11035; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; November 2, 1966; hearing for offer and 8:47 a.m.] 5423; for construction permits. It is ordered, This 4th day of October receipt of exhibits will be held on Novem 1966, that Jay A. Kyle shall serve as ber 9, 1966, and further hearing for oral [Docket No. 17719] Presiding Officer in the above-entitled examination of witnesses will be held on November 15, 1966. UNION SPEDITIONS proceeding; that the hearings therein shall be convened on November 21, 1966, Released: October 5,1966. GESELLSCHAFT m.b.H at 10 a.m.; and that a prehearing con Notice of Postponement of ference shall be held on October 17,1966, F ederal C ommunications C o m m is s io n , Prehearing Conference commencing at 9 a.m.: And, it is further ordered, That all proceedings shall be [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , Notice is hereby given that the pre- held in the Offices of the Commission, Secretary. hearing conference on the above-entitled Washington, D.C. [F.R. Doc. 66-11008; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; application now assigned to be held on 8:45 a.m.] October 18, 1966, is postponed to Oc Released: October 5, 1966. tober 25,1966,10 a.m., e.d.s.t., Room 211, F ederal C ommunications [Docket Nos. 16876-16878; FCC 66-839] Universal Building, 1825 Connecticut C o m m is s io n , Avenue NW., Washington, D.C., before [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , LORAIN COMMUNITY BROADCAST Examiner Milton H. Shapiro. Secretary. ING CO. ET AL. Dated at Washington, D.C., October [F.R. Doc. 66-11006; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; Order Designating Applications for 5, 1966. 8:45 a.m.] Consolidated Hearing on Stated [ seal] F r a n c is W . B r o w n , Issues [Docket No. 16690; FOC 66M-1345] Chief Examiner. DAILY EXPRESS, INC., ET AL. In re applications of Lorain Com [F.R. Doc. 66-11036; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; munity Broadcasting Co., Lorain, Ohio; 8:47 a.m.] Order Continuing Hearing Docket No. 16876, File No. BP-16940; Requests: 1380 kc, 500 w, Day; Allied [Docket No. 15356, etc.] In the matter of Daily Express, Inc., Broadcasting, Inc., Lorain, Ohio; Docket Post Office Box 39, Carlisle, Pa.; Com No. 16877, File No. BP-17297; Requests: northeast-b a h a m a s s e r v ic e plainant; versus American Telephone & 1380 kc, 500 w, Day; Midwest Broadcast CASE Telegraph Co., 195 Broadway, New York, ing Co., Lorain, Ohio; Docket No. 16878, N .Y.; The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsyl File No. BP-17302; Requests: 1380 kc, Notice of Hearing vania, 1 Parkway, Philadelphia, Pa.; The 500 w, Day; for construction permits. United Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania, At a session of the Federal Communi Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Carlisle, Pa.; Defendants; Docket No. thQtCra* ^Tiation Act of 1958, as amended, cations Commission held at its offices 16690. in Washington, D.C., on the 21st day n r n L hearinS in the above-entitled Pursuant to a prehearing conference of September 1966; will be held on November 14, as of this date: It is ordered, This 5th 1. The Commission has before it the 2 , at a m- in Room 726, Universal day of October 1966, that the complain a,bove-captioned and described applica w , XnV 825 Connecticut Avenue NW., ant herein shall exchange its exhibits on tions, each requesting authority to con I Newrrtann’ ° ^ ^e^ore Examiner Ross or before December 10,1966, and that the tinue standard broadcast service in other parties shall notify complainant on Lorain, Ohio, now being provided by in™ivi?fon?ation concerning the issues or before January 3, 1967, as to the wit Station W W IZ.1 Each of the applicants ceeriil^ other details in this pro nesses desired for cross-examination; to fh *ntorested persons are referred It is further ordered, That the hearing 1 An application for renewal of the license 8 ° rders of Investigation now scheduled for November 9, 1966, be 436 of March 29, 1966, and E-23760 of WWIZ has been denied, and WWIZ must and the same is hereby rescheduled for cease operation on October 13, 1966. No. 197------6 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13150 NOTICES also requests interim authority to oper some minor interference requires reso (b) The financial statements sub ate on the W W IZ frequency pending the lution in favor of the former; and that mitted by the two stockholders, Austin final determination of the proceeding the issues raised by W T T H are inappro W. O ’Toole and George T. Mobille, who ordered herein. Also before the Com priate in this proceeding. have agreed to lend funds to the cor mission is a petition to designate the ap 5. In its response, W SPD supports poration are not complete and do not plications for hearing filed June 28,1966, W T T H ’S request for the alternative segregate assets and liabilities in a man by The Times Herald Co., licensee of facilities issue and requests that the is ner to establish the availability of suf standard broadcast Station W iT'H, Port sue be cast in terms of interference to ficient liquid assets with which to meet Huron, Mich. (1380 kc, 5 kw, DA-2, U ) ; 2 both WTTH and WSPD. their loan commitments. opposition to the W TTH petition filed 6. W T T H replies by stating that it - (c) The Lorain Community applicant by Lorain Community on July 11, 1966; doubts that there is any real danger that indicates that the operation of WWIZ a response to the W T T H petition of July applicants will be discouraged by the in has been observed and that it is ap 11, 1966, by the Storer Broadcasting Co., clusion of a hypothetical alternative issue parent that a station in Lorain will at licensee of standard broadcast Station in the light of an impending, lengthy tract sufficient advertising revenue to WSPD, Toledo, Ohio (1370 kc, 5 kw, hearing; that Lorain Community is mis cover the cost of the station’s operation. D A-N, U ) ; and W T T H ’s reply to the taken in arguing that W T T H is not a Apart from this statement, there is no Lorain Community opposition filed party in interest; that W T T H ’s request indication of the basis for the appli July 20, 1966. is reasonable; and that the burden cant’s estimate of anticipated revenue. 2. With respect to the requests for should be on the applicant to introduce Accordingly, issues will be specified to interim operating authority, each of the evidence on the hypothetical alternative permit Lorain Community to establish applicants has indicated a willingness to issue. the basis for its estimate of revenue and whether it will have funds in a sufficient participate with the other applicants in 7. With respect to the dispute over amount to cover the costs and construc the temporary operation of facilities at W T T H ’s standing as a party in interest, tion and initial operation of the pro Lorain. Therefore, the Commission will it is settled that an existing station is posed station. defer action on the request for temporary entitled to a hearing on an application authority for a period of thirty (30) days which proposes an operation involving With respect to the application of Allied within which the interested applicants interference to that station. Federal Broadcasting, Inc.: may submit for the Commission’s con Communications Commission v. N a (a) It appears that $204,413 will be sideration a joint proposal for interim tional Broadcasting Co., Inc. (K O A) 319 required to meet the costs of construc operation on a participating basis. U.S. 239 (1943). It is now established tion and operation for 1 year. Allied 3„ W T T H requests that the applica that in a case where a license has been has established the availability of $200,- tions be designated for hearing to de revoked, the Commission may authorize 000. Therefore, it will be necessary to termine whether overlap of contours an interim operation on the frequency specify an issue to determine if the 'addi prohibited by § 73.37(a) of the Commis without holding a hearing at the instance tional funds necessary will be available. sion’s rules would result; whether the of a station which received interference (b) It has not been determined overlap would be greater or less than from the formerly licensed operation. whether the proposed antenna would the existing overlap involving W T T H Beloit Broadcasters, Inc., v. Federal constitute a menace to air navigation. and the existing operation of W W IZ ; Communications Commission, decided With respect to the application of the the extent of the area and population; July 27, 1966, by the U.S. Court of Ap Midwest Broadcasting Co.: whether the public interest would be peals for the District of Columbia Cir (a) A total of $99,341 will be required served by a waiver of § 73.37(a); whether cuit, Case No. 19,908, 7 R R 2d 2155. to meet the costs of construction and 1 a directional antenna could be designed Likewise, we believe that this decision year’s operation. To meet these costs which would be feasible for use in Lorain; holds that a licensee, whose operation the applicant has $4,600 in existing capi and whether the public interest would be previously received interference from a tal and will secure additional funds served by a grant of an application pro now defunct station, is not entitled to through loans from two individual stock posing to protect the contours of W TTH. a hearing as a matter of law under sec holders, Herbert L. Jacobs and S. Lee 4. In opposition to the W T T H peti tion 316 of the Communications Act of Kohrman, of $50,000 each. The finan tion, Lorain Community states that the 1934, as amended, where a new appli cial statements submitted on behalf of affidavit of the consulting engineer sup cant seeks authority to restore the pre the prospective lenders do not show lia porting the petition does not state that existing broadcast service. The present bilities and there is no showing that the the operation with a directional antenna applications specify essentially the same assets will provide funds to meet the would permit satisfactory service to Lo operating characteristics authorized for commitments. rain in accordance with the Commission’s the operation of W W IZ which involves (b) It has not been determined rules; that it is doubtful if the Lorain some interference to both W T T H and whether the proposed antenna would proposal could provide satisfactory cov WSPD. Under the Beloit decision a constitute a menace to air navigation. erage of the business district in the event grant of any of the applications would 9. Examination of the Allied applica the signal is suppressed as suggested by not constitute a modification of the li tion indicates that the radiation is the W T T H ; that W T T H can claim no injury censes of either W T T H or WSPD. same as that specified in the WWIZ au because the status quo is maintained and Therefore WTTH and WSPD have no thorization. However, it appears that therefore W T T H is not a party in interest standing to oppose the authorizations the radiation would be greater than in within the meaning of section 309(d) (1) sought and, accordingly, the requests for dicated because of a more efficient ground of the Communications Act; that the in hearing will be dismissed. system than that which has been used vestment involved in the installation of 8. Matters to be considered in conin the operation of W W IZ. No informa a directional antenna may discourage ap nection with the issues specified below tion was submitted to indicate the man plicants for the Lorain facility; that any are the following: ner in which the radiation is to be balancing of Lorain’s interests against With respect to the application of the restricted to the proposed value. There fore, any grant of the Allied application those of W T T H in the elimination of Lorain Community Broadcasting Co.: will be subject to the condition that pro (a) Lorain Community will require gram tests will not be authorized untu a The W TTH petition is directed specifically approximately $122,000 for the construc the permittee has submitted sumcien against the Lorain Community application tion and operation of the proposed sta data to establish that the radiation has and an application tendered by Sanford A. tion for 1 year. Lorain Community pro been adjusted to the value proposed. Schafitz. W TTH also requests a hearing on poses to meet these costs with existing any other application which is filed for the 10. By public notice of May W W IZ facilities. Simultaneously with the capital $42,606, a bank loan of $50,000, PCC 66-441, the Commission waived tne present action, the Commission is ordering and $20,000 in loans from two of the provisions of the note to § 1.571 o:f to that the Schafitz application be returned to stockholders and revenues as required. rules to permit acceptance of appu the applicant. Therefore, the WTTH peti tions by interested individuals or group tion, insofar as it opposes the Schafitz appli Thus, Lorain Community claims the cation is moot. availability of $112,606. desiring to compete for the Lorain faci FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 NOTICES 13151 ties with the Lorain Community Broad (a) Whether Herbert L. Jacobs and S. tDocket Nos. 16876-16878; FCC 66M-1341] casting application. The Allied and Lee Kohrman have sufficient cash and/ LORAIN COMMUNITY BROADCAST Midwest applications were filed in re o j liquid assets, to meet their respective sponse to that notice, and, accordingly loan commitments. N ING CO. ET AL. will be accepted at this time. Section (b) Whether, in the light of the evi Order Scheduling Hearing 1.580(b) of the Commission’s rules does dence adduced pursuant to the foregoing, not contemplate action on an applica the applicant is financially qualified. In re applications of Lorain Commu tion less than thirty (30) days following 5. To determine which of the proposals nity Broadcasting Co., Lorain, Ohio, the issuance of a public notice of the ac would better serve the public interest. Docket No. 16876, File No. BP-16940; Al ceptance of the application. However, 6. To determine, in the light of the lied Broadcasting, Inc., Lorain, Ohio; the Commission will, on its own motion, evidence adduced pursuant to the fore Docket No. 16877, File No. BP-17297; waive § 1.580(b) to permit the hearing on going issues, which, if any, of the ap Midwest Broadcasting Co., Lorain, Ohio; the applications to proceed without fur plications should be granted. Docket No. 16878, File No. BP-17302; for ther delay. It is further ordered, That the peti construction permits. 11. It appears that, except as in tions to designate the applications for It is ordered, This 26th day of Sep dicated in paragraphs above, the appli hearing filed by The Times Herald Co. tember 1966, that Millard F. French shall cants are qualified to construct, own, and and the request of the Storer Broadcast serve as Presiding Officer in the above- operate the facilities proposed, but that ing Co. are hereby dismissed. entitled proceeding; that the hearings the applications are mutually exclusive. It is further ordered, That, in the therein shall be convened on November Therefore, pursuant to section 309(e) of event of a grant of any of the proposals 7, 1966, at 10 a.m.; and that a prehear the Communications Act of 1934, as herein, the construction permit shall ing conference shall be held on October amended, the applications must be desig contain the following condition: 18,1966, commencing at 9 a.m.: And, it is nated for hearing. Pending a final decision in Docket No. further ordered, That all proceedings 12. Accordingly, it is ordered, That the 14419 with respect to presunrise opera shall be held in the Offices of the Com applications of Allied Broadcasting, Inc., tion with daytime facilities, the present mission, Washington, D.C. and Midwest Broadcasting Co., are here provisions of § 73.87 of the Commission’s Released: October 5,1966. by accepted for filing and designated for rules are not extended to this authori hearing in a consolidated proceeding with zation, and such operation is precluded. F ederal C ommunications the application of the Lorain Community It is further ordered, That, in the event C o m m is s io n , Broadcasting Co., at a time and place to of a grant of the application of Allied [ s e a l ] B e n F. W a p l e , be specified in a subsequent order, upon Broadcasting, Inc., the construction per Secretary. the following issues: mit shall contain the following condi [F.R. Doc. 66-11010; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 1. To determine whether there is a rea tion: 8:45 a.m.] sonable possibility that the respective Before program tests are authorized, tower heights and locations proposed by permittee shall submit sufficient data to Allied Brodacasting, Inc., and the Mid establish that the radiation has been ad [Docket Nos. 16890, 16891; FCC 66M-1332] west Broadcasting Co. would constitute a justed to the value proposed. LUIS PRADO MARTORELL AND menace to air navigation. It is further ordered, That to avail AUGUSTINE L. CAVALLARO, JR. 2. To determine with respect to the themselves of the opportunity to be application of the Lorain Community heard, the applicants, pursuant to § 1.221 Order Scheduling Hearing Broadcasting Co.: (c) of the Commission’s rules, in person In re applications of Luis Prado M ar- (a) Whether Austin W. O’Toole and or by attorney, shall within twenty (20) torell, Loiza, P.R.; Docket No. 16890, File George T. Mobille have sufficient cash days of the mailing of this order, file with and/or liquid assets to meet their respec the Commission, in triplicate, a written No. BP-16000; Augustine L. Cavallaro, Jr., Bayamon, P.R.; Docket No. 16891, tive loan commitments. appearance stating an intention to ap (b) The basis for the applicant’s es File No. BP-16182; for construction per pear on the date fixed for the hearing and mits. timate. of revenues in the first year of present evidence on the issues specified in operation, whether such estimate is rea the order. It is ordered, This 4th day of October 1966, that Elizabeth C. Smith shall serve sonable and, if not, the amount of rev It is further ordered, That the appli as Presiding Officer in the above-entitled enues which may reasonably be expected cants herein shall, pursuant to section proceeding; that the hearings therein in the first year. 311(a) (2) of the Communications Act of (c) In the light of the evidence ad 1934, as amended, and § 1.594 of the shall be convened on November 22, 1966, at 10 a.m.; and that a prehearing con duced pursuant to the foregoing, the. Commission’s rules, give notice of the manner in which the applicant will ob hearing, either individually or, if feasible ference shall be held on October 18,1966, commencing at 9 a.m.: And it is further tain sufljcient additional funds to enable and consistent with the rules, jointly, it to construct and operate the proposed within the time and in the manner pre ordered, That all proceedings shall be held in the Offices of the Commission, station for 1 year. scribed in such rule, and shall advise the Washington, D.C. (d) Whether, in the light of the evi Commission of the publication of such dence adduced pursuant to the foregoing, notice as required by § 1.594(g) of the Released: October 5,1966. the applicant is financially qualified. rules. , 3-i.T° determine with respect to the It is further ordered, That the Com F ederal C ommunications C o m m is s io n , Application of Allied Broadcasting, Inc.: mission will withhold action on the re [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , (a) The manner in which the appli quests for interim operating authority Secretary. cant will obtain additional funds to con submitted thus far for a period of thirty struct and operate the proposed station (30) days to permit interested applicants [F.R. Doc. 66-11011; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; for 1 year. who are parties to this proceeding to sub 8:45 a.m.] (b) in the event the applicant will mit a proposal for joint interim operation ,vly °n avenue for the additional funds, on a participating basis. [Docket No. 16895; FCC 66M-1329] ne basis for the applicant’s estimate of Released: October 5,1966. revenues in the first year of operation. BCU-TV (c) Whether, in the light of the evi F ederal C ommunications dence adduced pursuant to the fore C o m m is s io n ,3 Order Scheduling Hearing going (a and b ) , the applicant is finan [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , In re application of Mary Jane Morris cially qualified. Secretary. and James R. Searer, doing business as 4. To determine with respect to the [F.R. Doc. 66-11009; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; BCU-TV, Battle Creek Mich.; Docket No. 8:45 a.m.] application of the Midwest Broadcasting 16895, File No. BPCT—3654; for construc tion permit for new television broadcast * Commissioner Bartley dissenting. station (Channel 41). FEDERAL REGISTER, VÖL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13152 NOTICES It is ordered, This 4th day of October ing of the hearing now scheduled to eral Home Loan Bank Board Resolu 1966, that Isadora A. Honig shall serve as commence on October 10, 1966; tion No. 19,333, aforesaid, is hereby Presiding Officer in the above-entitled It appearing, that counsel pleads that amended as hereinafter set forth and, proceeding; that the hearings therein he has a conflict with another hearing to the extent inconsistent herewith, is shall be convened on November 21, 1966, now in progress, coupled with two other hereby superseded. at 10 a.m.; and that a prehearing con hearings also scheduled for October 1966; I. Restriction on advances. Institu ference shall be held on October 20,1966, It further appearing, that counsel tions that came under restriction under commencing at 9 a.m.: And it is further pleads that counsel has sought to find a prior policies of the Board, and that re ordered, That all proceedings shall be date early in November for the reschedul main under restriction as of the date of held in the Offices of the Commission, ing of this proceeding upon which all this statement shall continue to be re Washington, D.C. could agree but due to the general elec stricted until released, as hereinafter tion being held on November 8, 1966, indicated, following an evaluation by the Released: October 5,1966. hearings presently scheduled by the Ex Federal Home Loan Bank of which the F ederal C ommunications aminer on November 9 and 28, and a institution is a member. C o m m is s io n , previously announced scheduling diffi II. Elimination of restriction. Any [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , culty by counsel for the Minneapolis De member institution may have its access Secretary. partment of Aeronautics between No to advances restored, in whole or in part at the discretion of the Board, following [F.R. Doc. 66-11012; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966;' vember 11 and 22, agreement on a date 8:46 a.m.] in November could not be reached; an evaluation by the Bank of which the It further appearing, that counsel re institution is a member. quests that the hearing be rescheduled Advances for purposes other than [Docket No. 16894; FCC 66M-1330] for an early date in December 1966; meeting withdrawals following the res MARVIN H. OSBORNE It further appearing, that good cause toration of access to credit shall, except exists why said request should be as hereinafter indicated, be subject to Order Scheduling Hearing granted; such waiting period as the Board may Accordingly, it is ordered, This 5th day prescribe. In re application of Dr. Marvin H. of October 1966, that the request is The Banks may, following an evalua Osborne, Jackson, Miss.; Docket No. granted, and that the hearing now tion, release from restriction any institu 16894, File No. BPCT-3506; for construc scheduled for October 10, 1966, be and tions paying dividends or interest at a tion permit for new television broadcast the same is hereby rescheduled for De rate not in excess of 4% percent and such station (Channel 40). cember 5, 1966, 10 a.m., in the Commis institutions shall not be subject to the 6 It is ordered, This 4th day of October sion’s Offices, Washington, D.C. months to 1 year waiting period previ 1966, that David I. Kraushaar shall serve ously imposed. as Presiding Officer in the above-entitled Released: October 5, 1966. III. Evaluation of institutions remain proceeding; that the hearings therein F ederal C ommunications ing subject to restriction. In the case of shall be convened on November 21, 1966, C o m m is s io n , institutions which increased their rates at 10 a.m.; and that a prehearing con [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , on or after June 28, 1966, one of the cri ference shall be held on October 21,1966, Secretary. teria for the restoration of credit shall be commencing at 9 a.m.; And, it is further [F.R. Doc. 66-11014; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; the competitive situation at the time the ordered, That all proceedings shall be 8:46 a.m.] rate change was made. Any institution held in the Offices of the Commission, increasing its rate of return on or after Washington, D.C. that date should be afforded opportunity Released: October 5,1966. to make an affirmative showing, accept FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK BOARD able to the bank, that its rate action was F ederal C ommunications warranted by existing competitive pres C o m m is s io n , [ 20,218] sures. If, in the opinion of the Federal [ s e a l ] B e n F . W a p l e , ADVANCES Home Loan Bank, none of the other cri Secretary. teria are of sufficient significance to re quire further maintenance of restriction, [F.R. Doc. 66-11013; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; Restrictions 8:46 a.m.] the Bank may so notify the Board and O ctober 5, 1966. the Board may base its release of the Whereas by Federal Home Loan Bank institution thereon. [Docket Nos. 15841 etc.; FCC 66M-1344] Board Resolution No. 19,333, dated Au TV. Renewal of advances to restricted gust 6, 1965, and duly published in the institutions. In the case of any restrict WTCN TELEVISION, INC. F ederal R egister on August 13, 1965 (30 ed institution experiencing adverse sav (WTCN—TV) ET AL. F.R. 10124), this Board published its ings flows and other cash outflows based policy on restricting advances for pur on legal and binding loan commitments Order Continuing Hearing poses other than meeting withdrawals and loans-in-process disbursements, each In re applications of W TCN Television, to members of the Federal Home Loan Federal Home Loan Bank is authorized Inc. (W T C N -T V ), Minneapolis, Minn.; Bank System; and to negotiate a workout arrangement giv Docket No. 15841, File No. BPCT—2850; Whereas by Federal Home Loan Bank ing recognition to pertinent operating Midwest Radio-Television, Inc. (W C C O - Board Resolution No. 20,051, dated July characteristics including the renewal or refinancing of outstanding advances T V ), Minneapolis, Minn.; Docket No. 1, 1966, and duly published in the F ed made for purposes other than meeting 15842, File No. BPCT-3292; United Tele eral R eg ister on July 9, 1966 (31 F.R. vision, Inc. (K M S P -T V ), Minneapolis, 9429), the Board suspended its policy withdrawals. Resolved further that the Secretary to Minn.; Docket No. 15843, File No. B P C T - of restricting members from obtaining 3293; Twin City Area Educational Tele advances for purposes other than meet the Board is hereby directed to transmit the foregoing statement approved by the vision Corp. (K T C A -T V ), St. Paul, ing withdrawals without affecting mem Board to the Office of the Federal Regis Minn.; Docket No. 16782, File No. BPET— ber institutions previously restricted in 249; Twin City Area Educational Tele accordance with this policy; and ter for publication. vision Corp. (K T C I-T V ), St. Paul, Minn.; Whereas the Board has determined By the Federal Home Loan Bank Docket No. 16783, File No. BPET-250; to revise its requirements governing re Board. for construction permits. strictions on obtaining advances for pur [ s e a l ] H a r r y W . C a u l s e n , The Hearing Examiner having under poses other than meeting withdrawals Secretary. consideration request filed on October 3, heretofore imposed and still in effect: [F.R. Doc. 66-11032; Filed, Oct. 10, 196®’ 1966, on behalf of the Commission’s Now, therefore, it is hereby resolved Broadcast Bureau requesting a reschedul that the Board’s policy embodied in Fed^- 8:47 a.m.] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 NOTICES 13153 On July 5, 1966, Tenneco Oil Co. (Op conform to the provisions of the Natural FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION erator), et al., Applicant filed in Docket Gas Act and the requirements, rules and [Docket No. G-2933, etc.] No. CI67-7 an application pursuant to regulations of the Commission there section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act for under. LANDA OIL CO., ET AL. permission and approval to abandon a 05) It is necessary and appropriate in sale of natural gas to Lone Star Gas Co. carrying out the provisions of the Nat Findings and Order from the Doyle Field, Stephens County, ural Gas Act and the public convenience Okla. Permission and approval to aban and necessity require that the certificate S e pte m b e r 30, 1966. don the sale were granted by order issued authorizations heretofore issued by the Findings and order after statutory August 22, 1966, in Docket Nos. G-5130, Commission in Docket Nos. G-2933, G - hearing issuing certificates of public con et al., and the certificate of public con 3605, G-14198, G-15035, G-16271, G - venience and necessity, amending cer venience and necessity theretofore issued 17012,1 G-17791, CI62-305, CI63-1029, tificates, permitting and approving in Docket No. CI64-1023 was terminated CI64-580,1 and CI66-470 should be abandonment of service, terminating and the related rate suspension'proceed- amended as hereinafter ordered and certificates, reinstating rate proceeding, ing instituted in Docket No. RI66-369 conditioned. substituting respondent, making succes was terminated. A review of the records (6) The sales of natural gas proposed sor co-respondent, redesignating pro of the Commission reveals that other rate to be abandoned by the respective Ap ceedings, requiring filing of agreement schedules in addition to Applicant’s FPC plicants, as hereinbefore described, all and undertakings, and accepting related Gas Rate Schedule No. 67 are covered by as more fully described in the tabulation rate schedules and supplements for filing. said rate proceeding. Accordingly, the herein and in the respective applications, Each of the Applicants listed herein rate suspension proceeding in Docket No. are subject to the requirements of sub has filed an application pursuant to sec RI66-369 will be reinstated and said section (b) of section 7 of the Natural tion 7 of the Natural Gas Act for a cer docket will be terminated only with re Gas Act, and such abandonments should tificate of public convenience and neces spect to Tenneco Oil Co. (Operator), et be permitted and approved as herein sity authorizing the sale and delivery of al., FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 67. after ordered. natural gas in interstate commerce, for After due notice, no petitions to inter (7) It is necessary and appropriate in permission and approval to abandon vene, notices of intervention, or protests carrying out the provisions of the Natu service, or a petition to amend an exist to the granting of any of the respective ral Gas Act that the certificates of public ing certificate authorization, all as more applications or petitions in this order convenience and necessity heretofore is fully described in the respective applica have been received. sued to the respective Applicants relating tions and petitions (and any supplements At a hearing held on September 22, to the abandonments hereinafter per or amendments thereto) which are on file 1966, the Commission on its own motion mitted and approved should be termi with the Commission. received and made a part of the record nated. The Applicants herein have filed re in these proceedings all evidence, includ (8) It is necessary and appropriate in lated FPC Gas Rate Schedules and pro ing the applications, amendments, and carrying out the provisions of the Natu pose to initiate or abandon, add, or de exhibits thereto, submitted in support ral Gas Act that the rate suspension pro lete natural gas service in interstate com of the respective authorizations sought ceeding in Docket No. RI66-369 should merce as indicated by the tabulation herein, and upon consideration of the be reinstated and that said proceeding herein. All sales certificated herein are record, be terminated only with respect to Ten at rates either equal to or below the ceil The Commission finds: neco Oil Co. (Operator), et al., FPC Gas ing prices established by the Commis (1) Each Applicant herein is a “nat Rate Schedule No. 67. sion’s statement of general policy No. ural-gas company” within the meaning (9) It is necessary and appropriate in 61-1, as amended, or involve sales for of the Natural Gas Act as heretofore carrying out the provisions of the Natu which permanent certificates have been found by the Commission or will be en ral Gas Act that Landa Ôil Co. should be previously issued; except that initial gaged in the sale of natural gas in inter co-respondent in the proceeding pending sales from the Permian Basin area of state commerce for resale for ultimate in Docket No. RI61-210 and should be Texas are authorized to be made at or public consumption, subject to the juris substituted in lieu of Texas Gas Produc below the applicable area base rates and diction of the Commission, and will ing Co. as respondent in the proceedings under the conditions prescribed in therefore, be a “natural-gas company” pending in Docket Nos. RI64-730, RI64- Opinion Nos. 468 and 468-A. within the meaning of said Act upon the 740, and RI65-397, that the proceedings Landa Oil Co., Applicant in Docket No. commencement of the service under the should be redesignated accordingly, and G-2933, proposes to continue sales of respective authorizations granted here that Landa Oil Co. should be required to natural gas heretofore authorized in said inafter. file an agreement and undertaking in docket to be made pursuant to Texas Gas (2) The sales of natural gas herein each proceeding. Producing Co. FPC Gas Rate Schedule before described, as more fully described (10) It is necessary and appropriate in Nos. 2,3, and 4. Said rate schedules will in the respective applications, amend carrying out the provisions of the Natu be redesignated as those of Applicant. ments and/or supplements herein, will ral Gas Act that the respective related The presently effective rates under Texas be made in interstate commerce, subject rate schedules and supplements as desig Gas Producing Co. FPC Gas Rate Sched to the jurisdiction of the Commission, nated or redesignated in the tabulation ule Nos. 2, 3, and 4 are in effect subject and such sales by the respective Appli herein should be accepted for filing as to refund in Docket Nos. RI64-740, RI64- cants, together with the construction hereinafter ordered. 730, and RI65-397, respectively. An in and operation of any facilities subject The Commission orders: creased rate has been collected for a to the jurisdiction of the Commission (A ) Certificates of public convenience locked-in period by Texas Gas Producing necessary therefor, are subject to the re and necessity are issued upon the terms Co. pursuant to its FPC Gas Rate Sched- quirements of subsections (c) and (e) and conditions of this order, authorizing me No. 4 subject to refund in Docket No. of section 7 of the Natural Gas Act. the sales by the respective Applicants RI61-210. Therefore, Applicant will be (3) The sales of natural gas by the herein of natural gas in interstate com made co-respondent in the proceeding respective Applicants, together with the merce for resale, together with the con Pending in Docket No. RI61-210 and will construction and operation of any facil struction and operation of any facilities be substituted as respondent in the pro- ities subject to the jurisdiction of the ceedings pending in Docket Nos. RI64- subject to the jurisdiction of the Com Commission necessary therefor, are re mission necessary for such sales, all as 730 RI64-740, and RI65-397, the pro quired by the public convenience and ceedings will be redesignated, and Appli- necessity and certificates therefore hereinbefore described and as more fully ant will be required to file agreements should be issued as hereinafter ordered described in the respective applications, na undertakings to assure the refunds and conditioned. amendments, supplements and exhibits nmany 5counts collected in excess of the (4) The respective Applicants are able in this proceeding. determined to be just and rea and willing properly to do the acts and sonable in said proceedings. to perform the services proposed and to 1 Temporary certificate.. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13154 NOTICES (B ) The certificates granted in para (I) Permission for and approval of the acceptable agreements and undertakings graph (A ) above are not transferable abandonment of service by the respective in Docket Nos. RI61—210, RI64-730, and shall be effective only so long as Ap Applicants, as hereinbefore described, all RI64-740, and RI65-397 to assure the plicants continue the acts or operations as more fully described in the tabulation refunds, together with interest at the rate hereby authorized in accordance with the herein and in the respective applications of 7 percent per annum, of any amounts provisions of the Natural Gas Act and are granted. collected by it or by Texas Gas Produc the applicable rules, regulations and or (J) Permission and approval of the ing Co. in excess of the amounts deter ders of the Commission. abandonment of service by Applicant in mined to be just and reasonable in said FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 P F C rate schedule to be accepted F P C rate schedule to be accepted Socket No. Purchaser, field, and Docket No. Purchaser, field, and and date äled Applicant location and date filed Applicant location Description and date No. Supp. Description and date No. Supp. ol document of document G-16271...... do. Mississippi Biver Trans Texas Gas Producing 0167-106...... Philadelphia Oil Co____ Equitable Gas Co., Clay Notice of cancellation 2 2 £ 0-13-66 mission Corjx, Caddo Co., F P C G B S No. (G-274) District, Wetzel (undated).“ “ Lake Field, Harrison 6. B 7-29-6617 County, W . Va. County, Tex. Supplement Nos. 1-5___ 1-5 CI67-107...... Continental Oil C o_____ E l Paso Natural Gas Co., Contract. 7-7-flfi 1 316 Notice of succession A 8-1-66 1* Honolulu Mesa Area, ; 5-31-66. Bio Arriba County, N. Effective date: 10-15-65. Mex. G-17791...... Sohio Petroleum Co. Michigan Wisconsin Amended agreement 25 CI67-108...;— Cleary Petroleum, Ine. Cities Service Gas Co., Contract 7-1-fifi 11 20 O 8-1-66 * (Operator), et al. Pipe Line Co., Mocane- 7-5-66.» A 8-1-66»(Operator), et al. Knowles Gas Area, Contract 9-3-63______20 1 Laveme Field, Harper Beaver County, Okla. County, Okla. CI67-115...... d o . . . ____- ______Lone Star Gas Co., West 21 C 162-305____ Landa Oil Co. (suc Tennessee Gas Pipeline Texas Gas Producing A 8-1-66 » Velma Field, Stephens E 6-13-66 cessor to Texas Qas Co., a division of Co., F P C G B S No. County, Okla. Producing Co.). Tenneco Inc., Bayou 8. CI67-116...... Herman Brown Estate.. Texas Eastern Transmis- Notice of cancellation 10 1 Bambio, Terrebonne Supplement Nos. 1-2..., 1-2 (CI62-83) sion Corp., Northwest 7-26-66.“ “ Parish, La. Notice of succession B 7-29-66 Buttermilk Slough 5-31-66. Field, Matagorda Coun Effective date: 10-15-65 ty, Tex. CI63-1029___ Tacklon, Inc., et al. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Management Service CI67-118...... Bowers Drilling Co., Cities Service Gas Co., g £ 7-29-66 (successor to Manage Line Co., acreage in Corp., F P C G B S A 8-3-66“ Inc. acreage in Barber Coun ment Service Corp.). Moore and Carson No. 1. ty, Kims. Counties, Tex. Supplement Nos. 1-9___ 1-9 CI67-121...... Warren Petroleum Corp. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Notice of cancellation 47 1 Notice of succession (G-14140) of America, Fairbanks (Undated).“ “ (undated). B 8-3-66 Field, Harris County, Assignment 6-30-66____ 10 Tex. Effective date: 6-30-66.. CI64-680 «.. Landa Oil Co. (successor Panhandle Eastern Pipe Texas Gas Producing E 6-13-66 to Texas Gas Produc Line Co., Valley Center Co., F P C G B S No. 7. i Supplement No. 11 to F P C Gas Bate Schedule No. 2 and Supplement No. 15 to F P C Gas Bate Schedule No. 3, ing Co.). West Field, Dewey Supplement No. 1._____ respectively, pertain to sales being made pursuant to temporary authorization. Permanent authorization with re County, Okla. - Notice of Succession spect to these supplements is not being granted by this order. 5-31-66. » July 1, 1967, moratorium date pursuant to Commission’s statement of general policy No. 61-1, as amended. Effective date: 10-15-65. * Effective date: Date of initial delivery (Applicant should advise the Commission as to such date). NOTICES CI66-470...... Sunray D X Oil Co. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Supplemental agree 259 * Sale being made pursuant to temporary authorization; permanent authorization with respect to this sale is not 0 8- 1- 66» Co., Arkoma Area, ment 6-27-66.» being granted by this order. Haskell County, Okla. » Sale being made pursuant to temporary authorization; temporary certificate covers sales from subject interest A CI66-724... Continental Oil Co. E l Paso Natural Gas Contract 10-3-52 •_____ 311 in Tract 108 as an et al. interest covered by Sohio Petroleum Co. (Operator), et al. (G-17012) » Co., Sjpraberry Field, Supplemental agree 311 * On file as Sohio Petroleum Co. (Operator), et al., F P C G B S No. 45 as to gas produced from Tract 108. ¿Q-3605) * Glasscock County, ment 1-28-61. 7 Transfers all interest of Butter Wilbanks and Butter (one-eighth interest) in Tract No. 108 to San Jacinto Oil & F 2-7-66 Tex. Assignment 10-24-61 311 Gas Co. (subsidiary of Continental Oil Co.). Supplemental agree 311 « Certificate covers sales by predecessor in interest, Joseph S. Grass, under Grass’ F P C G B S No. 4. ment 4-11-63.“ » Between San Jacinto and E l Paso providing for a renegotiated base rate of 17.0 cents per Met Merger agreement 311 io Covers merger of San Jacinto Petroleum Corp. into Continental Oil Co. 1-31-64.1» n Certificate covers sales by Joseph S. Grass from Tract No. 113. Effective date: 10-24-61. i» On file as Joseph S. Gruss F P C G B S No. 1. (Q-3605) « Contract 3-24-54 u ______312 i» Transfers all interests of Butter Wilbanks and Butter (one-eighth interest) in Tract 113 to San Jacinto Oil & Gas Supplemental agree 312 Co. (subsidiary of Continental Oil Co.). ment 6-14-54. i* Jan. 1,1968, moratorium date pursuant to Commission’s statement of general policy No. 61-1, as amended, Supplemental agree 312 i» Source of gas depleted, ment 10-26-59. is Effective date: Date of this order. Supplemental agree 312 i7 Other sales authorized in Docket No. G-274, therefore, the certificate in said docket will be terminated only inso ment 12-9-60, far as it pertains to sales made under F P C G B S No. 2. Assignment 10-23-61 i»_ . 312 1» Ratifies basic contract dated Sept. 3,1963 between Cleary Petroleum, Inc., et al. and Cities Service. Supplemental agree 312 >» Operation of Applicant's plant discontinued. ment 4-11-63.» Merger agreement 312 [F.R. Doc. 66-10970; Filed, Oct. 10,1966; 8:45 a.m.] 1-31-64.1» Effective date: 10-23-61. CI67-17_____ Franks Petroleum, Inc. United Gas Pipe Line Contract 6-22-66 »__ .... tary of the Treasury to the Buffalo A 7-7-66“ Co., Driscoll Field, Bienville Parishs La. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Insurance Co., Buffalo, N.Y., a New CI67-101...... H . H . Howell (Opera United Gas Pipe Line Notice of cancellation York corporation, under the provisions (0160-640) tor), et al. Co., Sterling Field, 7-26-66.1» 1» Fiscal Service B 7-29-66 Jackson County, Tex. of the Act of Congress approved July 30, [Dept. Circ. 570,1966 Rev., Supp. No. 7J , CI67-102...... Publishers Petroleum, Colorado Interstate Gas Contract 7-7-66 ». 1947 (6 U.S.C. 6-13) to qualify as an A 7-29-66«* a division of the Co., Adams Banch acceptable surety on recognizances, stip Oklahoma Publishing Field, Meade County, BUFFALO INSURANCE CO. Co. Hans. ulations, bonds, and undertakings per CI67-103...... Charles J. Bichard, Cities Service Gas Co., Contract 7-18-66 ». Termination of Authority To Qualify mitted or required by the laws of the A 7-29-66 » et al. Southwest Wakita Field, Grant County, as Surety on Federal Bonds United States is terminated as of June 30, Okla. 1966. CI67-104____ Apeo Oil Corp. Cities Service Gas Co., Notice of cancellation 19 O ctober 5, 1966. (CI63-485) North Gérke Field, 7-25-66.1« « The Buffalo Insurance Co. ceased B 7-28-66 Pratt County, Elans. Notice is hereby given that the Cer writing new or renewal insurance busi 13155 See footnotes at end of table. tificate of Authority issued by the Secre ness effective June 30, 1966, and rein- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13156 NOTICES sured all of its existing insurance busi It is further ordered, That a copy of sion to enter an order under section 22 ness in forcé as of that date with this order be published in the F ederal of the Interstate Commerce Act authoriz the Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., R egister and served on the licensee. ing railroads subject to the Commission’s Hartford, Conn., a Connecticut corpora jurisdiction to transport hay to the J o h n F. G il s o n , disaster area at reduced rates: tion. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. Deputy Director, It is ordered, That carriers by railroad holds a Certificate of Authority from the Bureau of Domestic Regulation. Secretary of the Treasury as an accept participating in the transportation of [F.R. Doc. 66-11055; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; hay to the counties of: able surety on Federal bonds. 8:49 a.m.] Pursuant to a Reinsurance Agreement, Adams. Huntingdon. effective 12:01 a.m. July 1, 1966, the Allegheny. Indiana. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. assumed the Armstrong. Jefferson. outstanding insurance liabilities of the Bedford. Juniata. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Berks. Lackawanna. Buffalo Insurance Co. as of the close of Blair. Lebanon. business June 30,1966. Immigration and Naturalization Butler. Lehigh. The Treasury has obtained from the Service Cambria. Mercer. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., a separate Cameron. Mifflin. Indemnifying Agreement, dated August STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATION Carbon. Monroe. 30, 1966, whereby the Aetna Casualty Centre. Montgomery. Issuance and Publication of Northampton. & Surety Co. has assumed the liability Clarion. Regulations Clearfield. Northumberland. for any losses and claims that have Clinton. Perry. arisen or may arise under or in connec Effective upon publication in the F ed Columbia. Potter. tion with any bond, undertaking, or other eral R e g ister , the following amendments Crawford. Schuylkill. form of obligation entered into or as to the Statement of Organization of the Cumberland. Snyder. sumed by the Buffalo Insurance Co. on Immigration and Naturalization Service Dauphin. Somerset. or before June 30, 1966, in which the (19 F.R. 8071, Dec. 8, 1954), as amended, Elk. Union. Venango. United States has or may have an inter are prescribed: Fayette. Forest. Washington. est, direct or indirect. Copies of the 1. The first sentence of section 1.60 Franklin. Westmoreland. Reinsurance Agreement and the Indem General is amended to read as follows: Fulton. Wyoming. nifying Agreement are on file in the “The regulations of the Immigration Greene. York. Treasury Department, Bureau of Ac and Naturalization Service, published as all located in the State of Pennsylvania, counts, Surety Bonds Branch, Washing Chapter I of Title 8 of the Code of Fed referred to herein as the disaster area, ton, D .C .20226. eral Regulations, contain information be, and they are hereby, authorized under No action need be taken by bond- which, under the provisions of section section 22 of the Interstate Commerce approving officers, by reason of the Rein 552 of Title 5 of the United States Code Act to establish and maintain until May surance Agreement referred to herein, (P.L. 89-554, 80 Stat. 383), is required to 31, 1967, reduced rates for such trans with respect to any bond or other obli be published.” portation, the rates to be published and gation in favor of the United States, or 2. The last sentence of section 1.61 filed in the manner prescribed in section in which the United States has an inter Rule making is amended to read as fol 6 of the Interstate Commerce Act except est, direct or indirect, issued on or before lows: “The provisions of the Federal that they may be effective 1 day after June 30, 1966, by the Buffalo Insurance Register Act (49 Stat. 500; 44 U.S.C. publication and filing instead of 30. Co. pursuant to the Certificate of Au 301-314), as amended, and of the regula It is further ordered, That the class of thority issued to the company by the tions thereunder (1 CFR— Administra persons entitled to such reduced rates is tive Committee of the Federal Register) Secretary of the Treasury. hereby defined as persons designated as as well as the provisions of section 553 being in distress and in need of relief by [ s e a l ] J o h n K. C a r lo c k , of Title 5 of the United States Code (P.L. the U.S. Department of Agriculture or by Fiscal Assistant Secretary. 89-554, 80 Stat. 383) governing the such State agents or agencies as may in issuance of regulations are observed.” [F.R. Doc. 66-11031; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; turn be designated by the U.S. Depart 8:47 a.m.] Dated: October 5,1966. ment of Agriculture to assist in relieving R a y m o n d F. F ar r ell, the distress caused by the drouth. Commissioner of It is further ordered, That, during the Immigration and naturalization. period in which any reduced rates au FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION thorized by this order are effective the [F.R. Doc. 66-11019; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; carriers may, notwithstanding the provi [Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder 8:46 a.m.] License 1039] sions of section 4 of the Interstate Com merce Act, maintain higher rates to di GEORGE CO. rectly intermediate points and maintain through rates in excess of the aggregate Revocation of License INTERSTATE COMMERCE of intermediate rates over the same routes if one or more of the factors oi Whereas, George Leslie Miller, doing COMMISSION such aggregate of intermediate rates is a business as George Co., Pier A, Berth 7, reduced rate established under the au Long Beach, Calif. 90802, has ceased to [Drouth Order 65] ► operate as an independent ocean freight thority of this order. .- PENNSYLVANIA It is further ordered, That any tarins forwarder; and or tariff provisions published under Whereas, George Leslie Miller, doing Transportation of Hay at authority of this order shall explicitly s business as George Co., has returned his Reduced Prices state, making reference to this order oy Independent Ocean Freight Forwarder number and date. , License No. 1039 to the Commission for In the matter of relief under section 22 of the Interstate Commerce Act. And it is further ordered, That none cancellation. to the affected railroads and the genera Now, therefore, by virtue of authority Present: William H. Tucker, Vice Chairman, to whom the above-entitled public shall be given by depositing a copy vested in me by the Federal Maritime of this order in the Office of the Secretary Commission as set forth in Manual of matter has been assigned for action of the Commission and by Orders, Commission Order No. 201.1, thereon. It appearing, that by reason of drouth with the Director, Office of the Fed § 6.03; Register; and that copies be mailed to It is ordered, That the Independent conditions existing in certain portions of the State of Pennsylvania, hereinafter Chairman of the Traffic Executive Asso Ocean Freight Forwarder License No. ciation-Eastern Railroads, New * 1039 of George Leslie Miller, doing busi referred to as the disaster area, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of N.Y., the Chairman of the Sow11! ness as George Co. be and is hereby re Freight Association, Atlanta, Ga., voked, effective this date. Agriculture has requested the Commis- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 NOTICES 13157 Chairm an of the Executive Committee, A copy of the application is on file, and Kansas City, Mo. Send protests to: C. L. Western Railroad Traffic Association, can be examined, at the Office of the Phillips, District Supervisor, Interstate Chicago, HL, the Vice President and Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper Director, Bureau of Railway Economics, mission, Washington, D.C., and also in ations and Compliance, Room 350, Amer Association of American Railroads, the field office to which protests are to be ican General Building, 210 Northwest Washington, D.C., and to the President of transmitted. Sixth, Oklahoma City, Okla. 73102. the American Short lin e Railroad As No. MC 110525 (Sub-No. 802 T A ), filed M otor C arriers o f P r o p e r t y sociation, Washington, DC. October 4,1966. Applicant: CHEMICAL LEAMAN TANK LINES, INC., 520 East Dated at Washington, D.C., this 6th No. MC 1756 (Sub-No. 6 TA) (Correc Lancaster Avenue, Downingtown, Pa. day of October AJD. 1966. tion), filed September 27, 1966, pub lished F ederal R e g ister , issue of Octo 19335. Applicant’s representative: Ed By the Commission, Vice Chairman ber 4, 1966, and republished as corrected win H. van Deusen (same address as Tucker. this issue. Applicant: PEOPLES E X above). Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, [ seal] H. N e il G a r s o n , PRESS CO., 497 Raymond Boulevard, Secretary. Newark, N.J. Applicant’s represent over irregular routes, transporting: Syn ative; Bert Collins, 140 Cedar Street, thetic resin, in bulk, in tank vehicles, [F.R. Doc. 66-11037; Piled, Oct. 10, 1966; from Toms River, N.J., to Long Island 8:48 axa.] New York, N.Y. 10006. Authority sought to operate as a common carrier, City and Farmingdale, N.Y., for 180 days. by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Supporting shipper: CIBA Corp. Send FOURTH SECTION APPLICATION transporting: Aluminum and tin cans, protests to: Peter G. Guman, District FOR RELIEF on automated trailers, from Danbury, Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Com Conn., to New York, N.Y., for the account mission, Bureau of Operations and Com O ctober 6, 1966. of Aluminum Can Co., Inc., for 180 days. pliance, 900 U.S. Customhouse, Second Protests to the granting of an appli Supporting shipper: Aluminum Can Co., and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia, Pa. cation must be prepared in accordance Inc., Great Pasture Road, Post Office 19106. with Rule 1.40 of the general rules of Box 291, Danbury, Conn. 06810. Send No. MC 111069 (Sub-No. 36 T A ), filed practice (49 CFR 1.40) and filed within protests to: Robert S. H. Vance, District October 4, 1966. Applicant: COLDWAY 15 days from the date of publication of Supervisor, Bureau of Operations and CARRIERS, INC., Post Office Box 38, this notice in the F ederal R eg iste r . Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com State Highway 131, Clarksville, Ind. mission, 1060 Broad Street, Newark, N.J. Applicant’s representative: Smith, Reed, A ggregate- o f -I ntermediates 07102. N o t e : This republication adds Yessin and Davis, Sixth Floor, Mc FSA No. 40733— Passenger fares in the words “for the account of Aluminum Clure Building, Frankfort, Ky. Au western territory. Filed by E. B. Pad- Can Co., Inc.” inadvertently omitted in thority sought to operate as a contract rick, agent (No. 11), for interested rail the previous publication. carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregu carriers. Relating to transportation of No. MC 30837 (Sub-No. 341 T A ), filed lar routes, transporting: Coffee whitener passengers, between points on lines of October 4, 1966. Applicant: KENOSHA ( coffee pak), vegetable oil base in Vz-oz. applicant carriers and between such AUTO TRANSPORT CORPORATION, containers, from Louisville, Ky., to East points on the one hand, and points on 4519 76th Street, Kenosha, Wis. 53141. St. Louis, Chicago, and Rockford, 111.; lines of connecting carriers, on the other. Applicant’s representative r Albert P. Indianapolis, Ind.; Ashland, Ky.; New Grounds for relief— Establishment of Barber (same address as above). Au Orleans, La.; Biloxi, Miss.; St. Louis, new fares by applicant carriers and thority sought to operate as a common Mo.; Cincinnati and Cleveland, Ohio; maintenance of present fares by con carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular Nashville, Chattanooga, and Memphis, necting carriers. routes, transporting: New automobiles, Tenn.; Charleston, W . Va.; Atlanta, Ga.; By the Commission. in secondary movements, by the truck- for 150 days. Supporting shipper: Food away methods, from Buffalo, N.Y., and Specialties of Kentucky, Post Office Box [ seal] h . N e il G a r so n , points within 20 miles thereof, to Fram 1017, Louisville, Ky. 40201. Send pro Secretary. ingham, Mass., and Hagerstown, Md., tests to: R. M. Hagarty, District Su [F.R. Doc. 66-11038; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; and points in New York and Pennsyl pervisor, Bureau of Operations and 8:48 am.] vania, restricted to transportation of Compliance, Interstate Commerce Com vehicles manufactured or assembled at mission, 802 Century Building, 35 South the site of the plant of American Motors Pennsylvania Street, Indianapolis, Ind. 46204. [Notice 266] (Canada) Ltd., in Brampton, Ontario, Canada, having an immediately prior No. MC 124078 (Sub-No. 248 T A ), filed MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY October 4, 1966. Applicant: SCHWER- AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS movement by truck, for 180 days. Sup porting shipper: American Motors Corp., MAN TRUCKING CO., 611 South 28th Street, Milwaukee, Wis. 53246. Appli O ctober 6, 1966. 14250 Plymouth Road, Detroit, Mich. cant’s representative: James R. Ziperski The following are notices of filing of 48232, Leonard C. Kropp, Distribution Traffic Manager, Automotive Division. (same address as above). Authority applications for temporary authority un sought to operate as a common carrier, Send protests to: W . F. Sibbald, Jr., der section 210a(a) of the Interstate by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, District Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Commerce Act provided for under the transporting: Lime, in bulk, in tank vehi Commission, Bureau of Operations and new rules in Ex Parte No. M C 67 (49 cles, from Alabaster, Ala., to Rockmart, Compliance, 108 West Wells Street, CFR Part 240) published in the F ederal Ga., for 150 days. Supporting shipper: Room 511, Milwaukee, Wis. 53203. R egister, issue of April 27, 1965, effective Alabaster Lime Co., Inc., Alabaster, Ala. July 1, 1965. These rules provide that No. MC 40270 (Sub-No. 5 T A ), filed 35007, C. H. Fortner, Assistant to the Protests to the granting of an application October 4, 1966. Applicant: A. J. President. Send protests to: W . F. Sib i f j 36 with the field official named CRABBS, Rural Route No. 2, Enid, Okla. bald, Jr., District Supervisor, Interstate m the F ederal R eg ister publication, 73701. Applicant’s representative: John Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper witnin 15 calendar days after the date E. Jandera, Jandera and Christey, 641 ations and Compliance, 108 West Wells n, y , of the filing of the application is Harrison Street, Topeka, Kans. 66603. Street, Room 511, Milwaukee, Wis. 53203. puDiished in the F ederal R e g ist e r . One Authority sought to operate as a com No. MC 126276 (Sub-No. 4 T A ), filed opy of such protest must be served on mon carrier, by motor vehicle, over irreg October 4, 1966. Applicant: FAST ^PPlicant, or its authorized repre- ular routes, transporting: Dry feed and MOTOR SERVICE, INC., 7521 West 62d rtf# *1’ and the protest must feed ingredients, between Afton, Okla., Street, Summit, 111. 60608. Applicant’s wry that such service has been made. on the one hand, and, cn the other, points representative: Robert H. Levy, Levy and mu®t be specific as to the in Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas, and Andrin, 29 South La Salle Street, Chi win a« wlucl1 such protestant can and Texas, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: cago, 111. 60603. Authority sought to Orion« i ’ andm ust consist of a signed Clifford H. DeKesel, Farmland Indus operate as a contract carrier, by motor original and six copies. tries, Inc., 3315 North Oak Trafficway, vehicle, over irregular routes, transport- No. 197------7 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER 11, 1966 13158 NOTICES ing: Materials and supplies used in the Minn.; and Sault Ste. Marie, Mich.; to points in La Porte and Porter Counties, manufacture of metal containers, be points in Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indi; fertilizer, from Calumet City, 111., tween the plantsite of Crown Cork & Indiana, and Michigan, for 180 days. to points in La Porte and Porter Coun Seal Co., Inc., at Chicago, HI., and .the Supporting shippers: Boehm-Madisen ties, Ind., and from Chicago Heights, 111., plantsite of Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., Lumber Co., 161 West Wisconsin Avenue, to points in La Porte and Porter Coun at Cleveland, Ohio; and, metal con Milwaukee, Wis. 53203, Ben Nuzum Lum ties, Ind.; cement blocks from points in tainers, from the plantsite of Crown Cork ber Co., Tomah, Wis. 54660, Lake States Hlinois within 1 mile of Dyer, Ind., to & Seal Co., Inc., at Cleveland, Ohio, Lumber Co., Inc., 312 East Wisconsin points in La Porte County., Ind., and to South Bend, Ind., and Chicago, IU., Avenue, Post Office Box 1675, Milwaukee, Livestock, between Chicago, HI., on the for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Wis. 53201, Metropolitan Lumber Co., one hand, and, on the other, points in Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc., 9300 Ashton 1300 North Glenview Place, Milwaukee, La Porte and Porter Counties, Ind. Road, Post Office Box 6208, Philadelphia, Wis. 53213. Send protests to: W . F. Sib- Robert W. Loser, 409 Chamber of Com Pa. 19136. Send protests to: Charles J. bald, Jr., District Supervisor, Interstate merce Building, Indianapolis, Ind. 46204, Kudelka, District Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper attorney for applicants. Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper ations and Compliance, 108 West Wells No. MC-FC-68982. By order of Sep ations and Compliance, Room 1086, U.S. Street, Room 511, Milwaukee, Wis. 53203. tember 30, 1966, the Transfer Board, on reconsideration, approved the transfer to Courthouse and Federal Office Building, By the Commission. 219 South Dearborn Street, Chicago, 111. Allied Truck, Inc., Portland, Oreg., of 60604. [ s e a l ] H. N e il G a r s o n , the portion of the operating rights in No. MC 127567 (Sub-No. 2 TA) Secretary. certificate No. MC-29447 issued February (Amendment), filed September 27, 1966, [F.R. Doc. 66-11039; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 20, 1961 to Sandy Truck Line, Inc., published in F ederal R eg ist e r , issue of 8:48 a.m.] Sandy, Oreg., authorizing the. transpor October 4, 1966, and republished as tation of: Household goods, as defined amended this issue. Applicant: SM ITH > by the Commission, and lumber mill & WEEKS, INC., Main Street, Mars Hill, [Notice 1424] products, forest products, agricultural, Maine 04758. Applicant’s representa MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER commodities, seed, and machinery, be tween specified points in Washington, tive: William D. Pinansky, 443 Congress PROCEEDINGS Street, Portland, Maine. Authority and Oregon. Lawrence V. Smart, Jr., sought to operate as a contract carrier, O ctober 6 ,1966. 419 Northwest 23d Avenue, Portland, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, Synopses of orders entered pursuant to Oreg. 97210, attorney for applicants. transporting: Rock salt, in bulk, in dump section 212(b) of the Interstate Com No. MC-FC-69043. By order of Sep type vehicles, from the international merce Act, and rules and regulations pre tember 30, 1966, the Transfer Board ap boundary between the United States and scribed thereunder (49 CFR Part 179), proved the ^transfer to Donald F. Nottke and Robert E. Nottke, a partnership, Canada at or near the port of entry of appear below: Bridgewater, Maine, to points in Aroo As provided in the Commission’s spe doing business as Nottke Bros., Traverse stook and Washington Counties, Maine, cial rules of practice any interested per City, Mich., of the operating rights in for 150 days. Supporting shipper: Mor son may file a petition seeking recon certificate No. MC-118392, issued No ton Salt Co., 110 North Wacker Drive, sideration of the following numbered vember 18, 1960, to Harry E. Heller and Chicago, 111. Send protests to: Donald proceedings within 20 days from the date Donald F. Nottke, a partnership, doing G. Weiler, District Supervisor, Room 307, of publication of this notice. Pursuant to business as Heller & Nottke, Traverse City, Mich., authorizing the transporta 76 Pearl Street, Portland, Maine 04112. section 17(8) of the Interstate Commerce tion, over irregular routes, of frozen N ote: The purpose of this republication Act, the filing of such a petition will post is to change the destination territory to pone the effective date of the order in fruits, from Traverse City, Mich., to points in Illinois, with no transportation points in Aroostook and Washington that proceeding pending its disposition. for compensation on return except as Counties, Maine. The matters relied upon by petitioners otherwise authorized. Mrs. Donald F. No. MC 128446 (Sub-No. 1 T A ), filed must be specified in their petitions with Nottke, 622 Webster Street, Traverse October 4,1966. Applicant: ROBERT A. particularity. City, Mich. 49684, representative for ap MORRIS, doing business as M ORRIS No. MC-FC-68777. By order of Sep TR U C K IN G SERVICE, Star Route, In tember 30, 1966, the Transfer Board ap plicants. No. MC-FC-69049. By order of Sep dian River, Mich. 49749. Applicant’s proved the transfer to Gilpin County tember 28, 1966, the Transfer Board ap representative: Robert A. Morris, Indian Freight Service, Inc., Denver, Colo., of proved the transfer to Brown’s Truck River, Mich. 49749. Authority sought to the portion of the certificate of registra ing Co., a corporation, Trenton, N.J., of operate as a common carrier, by motor tion in No. MC-98757 (Sub-No. 4), issued certificate in No. MC—2017, issued De vehicle, over irregular routes, transport December 7, 1964, to Thomas D. Lane, cember 11,1962, to Helen M. Citro, doing ing: Pallets and rough lumber, from doing business as Thomas D. Lane Truck business as Brown’s Trucking Co., Tren Vanderbilt, Mich., to Milwaukee, Wis., Lines, Denver, Colo., evidencing a right to ton, N.J., authorizing the transporta for 150 days. Supporting shipper: O. W . engage in transportation in interstate or foreign commerce solely within the State tion of: General commodities, with the Rowley & Sons, Inc., Vanderbilt, Mich. usual exceptions including household 49795. Send, protests to: C. R. Flem of Colorado, corresponding to certificate of public convenience and necessity No. goods and commodities in bulk, over reg ming, District Supervisor, Bureau of ular routes, between Philadelphia, Pa-> Operations and Compliance, Interstate PUC-1127, as transferred to Thomas D. Lane, doing business as Thomas D. Lane and New York, N.Y.; between Trenton, Commerce Commission, 221 Federal N.J., and Philadelphia, Pa.; between Building, Lansing, Mich. 48933. Truck Lines, Denver, Colo., by decision No. 49158, dated November 27, 1957, as Trenton, N.J., and New Brunswick, N.J., No. MC 128615 TA, filed October 4, and between Trenton, N.J., and Prince 1966. Applicant: CHARLES J. UNRATH, issued by the Public Utilities Commission of the State of Colorado. Julius I. Gins ton, N.J.; serving all intermediate points doing business as CHARLES UNRATH and certain specified off-route points. berg, 818 Majestic Building, Denver, Colo. TRUCKING, 1018 Milwaukee Street, August W. Heckman, 297 Academy 80202, attorney for transferee. Delafleld, Wis. 53018. Applicant’s repre Street, Jersey City, N.J. 07306, attorney sentative: William C. Dineen, 412 Empire No. MC-FC-68940. By order of Sep tember 30, 1966, the Transfer Board, on for applicants. , , Gon Building, 710 North Plankinton Avenue, No. MC-FC-69052. By order of bep reconsideration, approved the transfer to Milwaukee, Wis. 53203. Authority sought tember 30, 1966, the Transfer B oard ap to operate as a common carrier, by mo Wanatah Trucking Co., Inc., Wanatah, Ind., of certificate No. M C-113569, issued proved the transfer to Gainey tor vehicle, over irregular routes, trans Lines, Inc., Hanahan, S.C., of certificate porting: Lumber, from the ports of entry January 13, 1954, to Earl J. Mohlke, Wanatah, Ind., and authorizing the in No. MC-117695, issued April 29, l»jy> on the international boundary line be to Vance B. Murphy, Orangeburg, tween the United States and Canada, lo transportation of: Grain, from points in La Porte and Porter Counties, Ind., to authorizing the transportation ot. cated at or near Portal, N. I)ak.; Interna nanas, from Miami and Tampa, Fla., tional Falls, Pigeon River, and Noyes, Chicago, HI.; feed, from Chicago, HI., to FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY,' OCTOBER T1, I9 6 0 NOTICES 13159 Charleston, S.C., to Columbia, S.C. [Notice 1424—A] No. MC-FC-68800. By order of Sep Frank A. Graham, Jr., 707 Security Fed tember 30, 1966, Division 3, acting as an eral Building, Columbia, S.C. 29201, at MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER Appellate Division, approved the transfer torney for applicants. PROCEEDINGS No. MC-FC-69098. By order of Sep to Charles F. Padovano, doing business O ctober 6, 1966. tember 29, 1966, the Transfer Board as Padovano Trucking Co., Kearny, approved the transfer to Gale Industrial Synopses of orders entered pursuant N.J., of the portion of the operating to section 212(b) of the Interstate Com Rigging & Erecting Contractors, Inc., rights in certificate No. MC-7089 issued Detroit, Mich., of the operating rights merce Act, and rules and regulations prescribed thereunder (49 CFR Part August 2, 1966, to Jacob Lazer, doing of Gale Heavy Haul, Inc., in certificate 179), appear below: business as Bond Motor Express Co., No. MC-47024, issued August 3, 1965, As provided in the Commission’s gen Paterson, N.J., authorizing the transpor authorizing the transportation, over ir eral rules of practice any interested per-, tation of: General commodities, with regular routes, of heavy machinery, be son may file a petition seeking recon the usual exceptions, between points in sideration of the following numbered tween points in the Lower Peninsula of Hudson County, N.J., and New York, proceedings within 30 days from the Michigan. Richard D. Weber, 1600 N.Y. George A. Olsen, 69 Tonnele Ave Dime Building, Detroit, Mich. 48226, at date of service of the order. Pursuant to section 17(8) of the Interstate Com nue, Jersey City, N.J. 07306, representa torney for applicants. merce Act, the filing of such a petition tive for applicants. [ seal] H . N e il G a r so n , will postpone the effective date of the [ s e a l ] H . N e il G a r so n , Secretary. order in that proceeding pending its dis position. The matters relied upon by Secretary. [FR. Doc. 66-11040; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; petitioners must be specified in their [F.R. Doc. 66-11041; Filed, Oct. 10, 1966; 8:48 am .] petitions with particularity. 8:48 a m .] FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 31, NO. 197— TUESDAY, OCTOBER l l f 1966 13160 FEDERAL REGISTER CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— OCTOBER The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during October. 3 e r a P8Be 13 CFR Page 24 CFR P roclamations : 121______12840 13081 203______3749 ______- 12935 P roposed R u l e s : 13000 3750 ______12995 121______,______12849,12924 220______13000 221______— 13000 E x e c u t iv e O rders : 232______13000 Sept. 24, 1847 (revoked by 14 CFR 234______13000 PLO 4100)______12950 37____ 12941 1000______13000 April 17, 1926 (revoked in part 39______— ____ - 12921 by PLO 4098)______12950 71_____ 12840,12921,12943,13038,13039, 26 CFR 11122 (superseded by EO 13115. P roposed R u l e s : 73______12922, 12944, 13115 113Q7) __— ------12917 1______12843, 12845, 13091 11215 (amended by EO 11309) _ 13075 95______12944 11307— ------12917 97______13116 29 CFR 121______13078 11308 ______12919 462______13001 11309 ______— 13075 208______— 12947 295______12948 31 CFR 378— ______r______12948 5 CFR 520______13001 213______12833, 12937, 13113 P roposed R u l e s : 1700______,— , - 13113 39______L j____ _ 12924 32 CFR 71______;______12925 13081 7 CFR 73______12925 855______210______- 13035 32A CFR 319______12834 15 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 701 ______13035 372 _ 13040 12924,13050 722l” I I II I I I ______13035, 13036, 13132 373 ______1 13040 Ch. X ______728 ______13036 374 _ :______13040 729 __ — ______12921,12940 379______13040 33 CFR 13129 8 1 l " ______- ______13133 382______13040 202_____ 13129 874______12940 385______— 13040 204______905______:______12835 398 ______— — - 13040 908 ______12836,13077 399 ______13040 37 CFR 909 _____ - ______— 13134 l ______12922 910 ______12837, 13077 16 CFR 915______13135 13______12937, 12938, 13078-13080 38 CFR 958______12940 13088 993______13037 18 CFR 13003 1038______13037 204______12840 1421______— 13078 41 CFR 1443______12837 19 CFR 9-1______13046 1490______12997 13046 1______12938,13080 9-2______P roposed R u l e s : 9-3______13046 730______— 12952P roposed R u l e s : 22-1_____ 13001 929______13136 12___ 12964 948______12953 42 CFR 982______12954 12939 20 CFR 22___;____ 984 13005 404______13126 993 ______13136 43 CFR 994 _ 13090 1005______12845,13090 21 CFR P u b l ic L and O rd er s: 1195 (revoked in part by PLO 1038______12954 8 ______12840 12950 1041______13136 17 ______12949 4099)______1069______13091 27 ______12949 3152 (revoked in part by PLO 1126______— 1300551______12950 4104)______" - l " 0* Ch. X I______12956 53______12840 3584 (revoked In part by PLO 121______12841,13128 41 n4") ______8 CFR 146_____ 12841 4098. 212____ 13114 P roposed R u l e s : ------12950 4099. 19— ______13005 4100 ------IIIIIII— 12950 9 CFR 121______12849 191______13006 97______13114 4102. ------12951 4103. 12 CFR 22 CFR 4104______12951 329______12837 41 ______13080 526______13039 42 ______13080 45 CFR 12842 545______—— ____ 12838, 12839, 13000 6______12842 P roposed R u l e s : 23 CFR 7 _ 12842 2221______12965 ch. n ______13128 8 _ FEDERAL REGISTER 13161 46 CFR Page P roposed R u l e s : 2------12860 - 24------12860 30______12860 70—L------12860 90------12860 110------12860 175------12860 188------12860 189 ______12860 190 ------12860 191 ------12860 192 ------12860 193 ------12860 194 ------12860 195 ------12860 196 ------12860 47 CFR P roposed R u l e s : 73------12965 50 CFR 32------12923. 12939, 13003, 13004, 13048, 13049, 13088,13130. 33— ------12939 PUBLIC PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES Now available Lyndon B. Johnson 1963-64 B o o k I (November 22, 1963 to June 30, 1964) Price $6.75 B o o k I I (July 1, 1964 to December 31, 1964) Price $7.00 Contents • Messages to the Congress • Public speeches and letters • The President’s news conferences • Radio and television reports to the American people • Remarks to informal groups , Prior volumes Published by Prior volumes covering most of the Truman administration and all of the Eisenhower and Office of the Federal Register National Archives and Records Service Kennedy years are available at comparable General Services Administration prices from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, Order from D.C. 20402. Superintendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402