NYIPLA to Honor Judge Richard Linn at 88Th Judges' Dinner in March

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

NYIPLA to Honor Judge Richard Linn at 88Th Judges' Dinner in March e-Bulletinwww. NYIPLA.org An 88-Year Tradition n Friday, March 26, 2010, mem- “This invention relates to an im- bers and guests of the NYIPLA proved Composition of Matter or Din- Special willO enjoy the ambiance and elegance of ner. Among the objects of the invention Edition the Waldorf=Astoria in a tradition that is to provide a Dinner to promote good began in 1922. For the past 87 years, fellowship between the Bench and the In This the association has been paying tribute Bar. A further objective of the inven- Issue to federal judges and the intellectual tion is to provide a novel (that is, not property community at the Annual Din- more than a few days old) combination u 1 u ner in Honor of the Federal Judiciary. of elements, herinafter termed “cours- An 88-Year The first dinner was held on Decem- es,” illustrated in the drawings and Tradition ber 6, 1922. It was a rousing success more particularly pointed out in the with 258 people. NYIPLA members appended claims.” u u 2 hosted 16 honored guests at 11 tables. Setting the foundation for the Din- Mario Cuomo Eleven judges attended from the Second nerʼs tradition of fine food and sump- Keynote Judicial District and the District of New Speaker at tuous desserts, the menu concluded the 88th Jersey. Among the attending judges was with “An Improved Composition of Annual the renowned Hon. Learned Hand, who Matter consisting of Bombe of Nessel- Judges’ was appointed by President Taft in 1909 rode Ice Cream, with assorted cakes, Dinner and spent 52 years on the federal bench. macaroons, lady fingers and coffee.” His cousin, Hon. Augustus Hand, was Through the years, the Dinner has u 3 u there as well. Also in attendance were continued to be the premier event for the NYIPLA to the U.S. Commissioner of Patents, NYIPLA. We have been honored with Honor Judge Richard Hon. T.E. Robertson, and the presidents the attendance of distinguished judges Linn of the Patent Law Associations of Chi- and enlightening keynote speakers, in- cago, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and the cluding Ronan Tynan, Ed Koch, Tim u u 4 American Patent Law Association. Russert, Scott Turow, Tom Brokaw -- History of the In the spirit of “patent law entertain- and this yearʼs speaker, Mario Cuomo. Outstanding ment,” the printed dinner menu ap- You can be a part of this historic event. Public Service peared in the form of a patent submit- Make your reservations to attend this Award ted by fictional applicants “William A. yearʼs dinner on Friday, March 26, 2010 u 5 u Cook and Alphonse A. Chef.” Some at the Waldorf=Astoria. Reservation Continuing quotes from that menu: forms are available at www.nyipla.org, Legal or call (201) 634-1870. Reservation The views expressed in the Bulletin are the views of the authors except deadline is February 9, 2010. where Board of Directors approval is expressly indicated. Education © Copyright 2010 The New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Inc. Program Page u 2 u e-Bulletinwww. NYIPLA.org conservatives have accorded this, their Mario Cuomo archenemy, a certain respect.” Keynote Speaker at the Cuomo served New York through th two national recessions and twelve 8 years of federal policies that cut back 8 on federal aid to New York and other Annual Judges’ states. Nevertheless, he balanced 12 Dinner budgets, reduced New Yorkʼs largest tax, the income tax, by more than 20 overnor Mario Cuomo is known as percent; rebuilt much of the stateʼs in- Gan intellectual, passionate, and chal- frastructure; reduced the mortality rates Court. A lawyer since 1956, he returned lenging force for social responsibility and on highways every year for seven years to the practice of law at Willkie Farr & diversity. When he addresses the judges, with the nationʼs first seat belt law and Gallagher LLP in 1995. NYIPLA members, and guests at the 88th an aggressive anti-drunk-driving pro- Cuomo is a scholar on Abraham Annual Dinner in Honor of the Federal Ju- gram; created the stateʼs first Centers of Lincoln and wrote Why Lincoln Matters: diciary on March 26, he is sure to remind Advanced Technology; and introduced Today More than Ever (Harcourt, 2004). us of our collective American legacy. programs like “Child Health Plus” and The book shows how Lincolnʼs big is- Cuomo is the longest serving Demo- the “Childrenʼs Assistance Program,” a sues – equality, the role of government, cratic Governor of New York in modern reform of the New York welfare system war and peace, and the responsibilities history. He twice set New York records that served as models for later federal of the fortunate few –still resonate in for highest popular vote ever achieved programs now in place. todayʼs world. in a state-wide election. The New York Governor Cuomo appointed 112 Itʼs time to make your reservations Times called his tenure one of the most judges, including all the judges of the for the 88th Annual Dinner in Honor celebrated governorships in history. New York State Court of Appeals during of the Federal Judiciary. The dinner The conservative National Review said, his tenure, as well as the first and second will be held on Friday, March 26 at the “Mario Cuomo has for years been hailed women judges, the first Black, the first Waldorf=Astoria Hotel. Reservation as both the philosopher-king and the Hispanic, and the first woman to serve forms are available at www.nyipla.org, humble conscience of the Democratic as Chief Judge. or call (201) 634-1870. The Reservation Party, a formidable, saintly genius of He declined invitations to run for deadline is February 9, 2010. For further liberalism. Since his efflorescence at the president of the United States and to information, contact Louise Lessersohn 1984 Democratic convention, even many serve on the United States Supreme at (201) 634-1870. Page u 3 u e-Bulletinwww. NYIPLA.org NYIPLA to Honor Judge Richard Linn at 88th Judges’ Dinner in March Judge Linn received his B.E.E. from Rens- for dedication, service, and devotion to justice selaer Polytechnic Institute in 1965 and a J.D. by the Austin Intellectual Property Law Asso- from Georgetown University Law Center in ciation. Last year, he was awarded the 2009 1969. He began his career in intellectual prop- New York Intellectual Property Law Associa- erty in 1965 as an examiner at the U.S. Pat- tion Leadership Award and the 2009 Jefferson ent Office while attending evening classes at Medal from the New Jersey Intellectual Prop- Georgetown. After three years, he moved to the erty Law Association. Office of Naval Research where he wrote and Judge Linn has demonstrated himself to prosecuted patent applications while complet- be a leader of the Patent Bench and Patent Bar ing his last year in law school. He was the head through his selfless dedication to the devel- of the intellectual property department at Marks, opment of Intellectual Property Law focused Murase & White for 20 years. During that time, American Inns of Court around the country. he acted as lead or senior counsel in over 30 liti- American Inns of Court are organizations that gations in the United States. In 1997, he joined bring together judges, senior lawyers, junior he Honorable Richard Linn will receive Foley & Lardner to manage and direct the Elec- lawyers, and students to promote the tradi- Tthe NYIPLA Outstanding Public Service tronics Practice Group of the firmʼs Intellectual tions of civility, excellence, and professional- Award at the 88th Annual Dinner in Honor of Property Department. He left the practice of law ism. There are currently ten IP focused Inns of the Federal Judiciary on March 26, 2010, at at the end of 1999 to become a Federal Circuit Court that are members of the Linn Inn Alli- the Waldorf=Astoria Hotel. For the past eight judge. ance, including New Yorkʼs Hon. William C. years, the Association has selected an OPS re- Judge Linn was a member of the founding Conner Inn of Court. The NYIPLA and the en- cipient in recognition of a lifetime dedicated to Board of Governors of the Virginia Bar Section tire IP community in New York are grateful to the pursuit and administration of justice. Judge on Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Law and Judge Linn for his exemplary leadership. Linn more than meets this standard. served as Chairman in 1975. In 2000, Judge NYIPLA members and guests will have Judge Linn is a Circuit Judge for the Unit- Linn received the Rensselaer Alumni Associa- an opportunity to honor and celebrate with ed States Court of Appeals for the Federal Cir- tion Fellows Award. He served as an Adjunct Judge Linn at the Dinner on March 26. Firms cuit. He was nominated by President Clinton Professor and Professional Lecturer in Law at who wish to take Congratulatory Notices in on September 28, 1999 and took the oath of George Washington University Law School the Dinner Program may call (201) 634-1870, office at the stroke of midnight on January 1, from 2001 to 2003, and currently serves on or email [email protected]. Forms for the 2000 becoming the first federal judge of the the Law Schoolʼs Intellectual Property Advi- Congratulatory Notices and Dinner Reserva- 21st century. sory Board. In 2006, Judge Linn was honored tions are available at www.nyipla.org. Page u 4 u e-Bulletinwww. NYIPLA.org History of the Outstanding Public Service Award hen Judge Richard Linn receives the NYIPLA Outstanding WPublic Service Award on March 26 at the Waldorf=Astoria, he will join an illustrious roster of recipients. The Association began giv- ing the award in 2003 when it was awarded to the late Hon.
Recommended publications
  • 2019-2020 Linn Inn Handbook V2.Pdf
    Contains Confidential Information. Do Not Distribute. The Richard Linn American Inn of Court 2019-2020 Membership Handbook www.linninn.org © 2019 Richard Linn American Inn of Court. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message From The President ..................................................................................... 1 Meeting Dates and Logistics ...................................................................................... 3 Member Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 6 Officers and Administrators ....................................................................................... 8 2019-2020 Program Schedule .................................................................................... 9 The Richard Linn American Inn of Court ...............................................................10 2019-2020 Membership & Dues Form ...............................................................10 Origins of the Mark T. Banner Scholarship .........................................................16 Diversity ...................................................................................................................17 Background ..............................................................................................................19 The American Inns of Court .................................................................................19 The Richard Linn American Inn of Court ............................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Web 2007-2008 Greenbook.Indd
    2007/2008 GREENBOOK THE NEW YORK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION, INC. HE ASSOCIATION IS ESTABLISHED TO MAINTAIN THE HONOR AND DIGNITY OF THE LAW OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS“T AND COPYRIGHTS; TO PROMOTE THE DEVEL- OPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION THEREOF; TO ADVANCE THE EDUCATION OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BAR AND THE PUBLIC IN THOSE FIELDS OF LAW, AND TO COOPERATE WITH FOREIGN ASSOCIATIONS IN HARMONIZING THE SUBSTANCE AND INTERPRETATION OF INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS FOR THE PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.” - BYLAWS, ARTICLE II MEMBER NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PATENT LAW ASSOCIATIONS i The GREENBOOK constitutes a review of the period from June 2006 through December 1, 2007. The closing date for inclusion of new members was February 1, 2008, and for changes to membership contact information was December 1, 2007. If any member wishes to update his or her contact information, please e-mail the Association at [email protected] with the updated information, and designate the subject line as “Contact Information”. © 2008 by The New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Inc. All rights reserved. ii EDITORIAL STAFF • EDITOR-IN-CHIEF Ashe P. Puri GREENBOOK EDITOR Stephen J. Quigley THE ASSOCIATION’S SECRETARY Charles R. Hoffmann • Executive Office of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Inc. 485 Kinderkamack Road, 2nd Floor Oradell, New Jersey 07649 Phone: 201-634-1870 Fax: 201-634-1871 General e-mail: [email protected] iii iv TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PAGE Section 1 Officers; Board of Directors ..........................................3 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter
    Fordham Law Review Volume 76 Issue 6 Article 13 2008 Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter Anu R. Sawkar Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Anu R. Sawkar, Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 3001 (2008). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol76/iss6/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Are Storylines Patentable? Testing the Boundaries of Patentable Subject Matter Cover Page Footnote J.D. Candidate, 2009, Fordham University School of Law; Ph.D., 2005, The Scripps Institute; B.A., 2000, Northwestern University. I would like to thank Professor Jeanne C. Fromer and Raymond C. Woodring for their invaluable support and comments. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol76/iss6/13 ARE STORYLINES PATENTABLE? TESTING THE BOUNDARIES OF PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER Anu R. Sawkar* This Note examines doctrinal issues relating to the patentability of nonphysical inventions by assessing a proposal to patent storylinesfor use in books and movies. Analyzing recent and historical case law regarding the limits of patentable subject matter, this Note identifies four points of doctrinal tension whose resolution will determine the extent to which nonphysical inventions, such as the storyline proposal, arepatentable.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipil/Houston
    SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO, summer home of IPIL’s annual National Conference IPIL/HOUSTON HOUSTON, TEXAS, home base of the Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Dean’s Message ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 RaspBerry ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 A Learning Center at an International Crossroads ................................................................. 2 Degree Offerings ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Principal Faculty ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Affiliated Faculty ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Adjunct Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................................... 7 IPIL Courses Typically Offered .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Judge William C
    Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court Reception and Dinner onn . C er C I m N a N i l o l f i C W o . u N r O t H I P N e 8 w 00 York 2 January 17, 2018 The Union League Club of New York Judge William C. Conner Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. At our Inaugural Dinner in 2009, we presented Mrs. Conner with a bouquet of her favorite flowers - yellow roses. Honorable William C. Conner passed away on July 9, 2009. His wife, Janice Files Conner, passed away on September 12, 2011. We continue to commemorate Mrs. Conner every year with yellow roses on the tables at our Annual Dinner. Program Reception • 6:00 pm Dinner • 7:00 pm Presentations 2018 Conner Inn Justice Awards to Distingished Senior Judges of the U.S. Court of Appeals U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and U.S. District for the Southern District of New York 2018 Conner Inn Excellence Award to Hon. Pierre N. Leval Senior Circuit Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Presented by Hon. J. Paul Oetken District Judge, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Linn Inn Alliance
    Contains Confidential Information. Do Not Distribute. The Richard Linn American Inn of Court 2020-2021 Membership Handbook www.linninn.org © 2020 Richard Linn American Inn of Court. All Rights Reserved. TABLE OF CONTENTS Message From The President ..................................................................................... 1 Meeting Dates and Logistics ...................................................................................... 3 Member Responsibilities ........................................................................................... 6 Officers and Administrators ....................................................................................... 8 2020-2021 Program Schedule .................................................................................... 9 The Richard Linn American Inn of Court ...............................................................10 2020-2021 Membership & Dues Form ...............................................................10 Mark T. Banner Scholarship ....................................................................................13 Origins of the Mark T. Banner Scholarship .........................................................16 Diversity ...................................................................................................................17 Hon. Arlander Keys Scholarship .............................................................................19 Background ..............................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner Journal
    Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court Reception and Dinner January 18, 2011 The Union League Club of New York Judge William C. Conner Mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court The mission of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of Court is to promote excellence in professionalism, ethics, civility, and legal skills for judges, lawyers, academicians, and students of law and to advance the education of the members of the Inn, the members of the bench and bar, and the public in the fields of intellectual property law. Program w w w Cocktail Reception • 6:00 pm w w w w w w Dinner • 7:00 pm w w w w w w Welcome w w w Anthony Giaccio w w w Presentation w w w Conner Inn Excellence Award to Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit by Judge Barbara S. Jones United States District Court, Southern District of New York w w w Remarks w w w by Judge Richard Linn United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit w w w Dinner Committee Chairperson Jeffrey M. Butler Commemorative Journal Chairperson Jeffrey M. Butler Message from Conner Inn Executive Committee Chair elcome to the annual Reception and Dinner of the Hon. William C. Conner Inn of WCourt. We are joined this evening at the Union League Club of New York by many honored guests, including distinguished members of the bench and bar. This evening, we will be presenting Chief Judge Dennis Jacobs of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit with the 2011 Conner Inn Excellence Award.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Circuit Justice
    Incorporating amendments to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 35 and 40. Updated to incorporate emergency amendment language for Fed. R. Cir. 15(f). United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Circuit Justice Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr. Chief Judge Sharon Prost Circuit and Senior Circuit Judges Pauline Newman Kimberly A. Moore Haldane Robert Mayer Kathleen M. O’Malley S. Jay Plager Jimmie V. Reyna Alan D. Lourie Evan J. Wallach Raymond C. Clevenger, III Richard G. Taranto Alvin A. Schall Raymond T. Chen William C. Bryson Todd M. Hughes Richard Linn Kara F. Stoll Timothy B. Dyk Federal Circuit Rules of Practice (December 1, 2020) – UPDATE Page i Officers of the Court and Senior Staff Peter R. Marksteiner CIRCUIT EXECUTIVE AND CLERK OF COURT Jeffrey Goldberg Jarrett B. Perlow GENERAL COUNSEL CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK Marilyn Wennes Patrick Barnwell SENIOR TECHNICAL ASSISTANT CHIEF DEPUTY FOR ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Jessica Perovich Riley Toussaint CIRCUIT LIBRARIAN DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Advisory Council Members Carter G. Phillips, Chair Matthias Kamber Leonard Davis (Ret.) Thomas W. Krause Tara D. Elliott Deanna Tanner Okun Michael R. Franzinger Kevin Parton Arthur J. Gajarsa (Ret.) Adam R. Shartzer Martin F. Hockey, Jr. Robert L. Stoll James F. Holderman (Ret.) David O. Taylor ex officio Peter R. Marksteiner George F. Hutchinson Jeffrey Goldberg Scott M. McCaleb Deborah M. Miron Michael J. Schaengold Sonal N. Mehta Jamie D. Underwood Federal Circuit Rules of Practice (December 1, 2020) – UPDATE Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ....................................................................................................................... xi Title I — Applicability of Rules ..................................................................................... 1 Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 1 ...................................................................... 1 Scope of Rules; Definition; Title Federal Circuit Rule 1 ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Circuit Rules of Practice
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit FEDERAL CIRCUIT RULES OF PRACTICE with Practice Notes and Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure March 2016 Washington, DC UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT Circuit Justice The Chief Justice Chief Judge Hon. Sharon Prost Circuit and Senior Circuit Judges Hon. Pauline Newman Hon. Haldane Robert Mayer Hon. S. Jay Plager Hon. Alan D. Lourie Hon. Raymond C. Clevenger, III Hon. Alvin A. Schall Hon. William C. Bryson Hon. Richard Linn Hon. Timothy B. Dyk Hon. Kimberly A. Moore Hon. Kathleen M. O’Malley Hon. Jimmie V. Reyna Hon. Evan J. Wallach Hon. Richard G. Taranto Hon. Raymond T. Chen Hon. Todd M. Hughes Hon. Kara F. Stoll Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court Daniel E. O’Toole Officers of the Court & Senior Staff Senior Staff Attorney, J. Douglas Steere Senior Technical Attorney, Marilyn Wennes Circuit Librarian, John D. Moore Operations and Administrative Services, Dale Bosley Director of Information Technology and Chief Deputy Clerk of Court, Mona Harrington United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Rules of Practice, Revised: March 2016 1 Advisory Council Carter G. Phillips, Chair Tina M. Chappell The Honorable Leonard Davis (Retired) Tara D. Elliott David Folsom Susan Tsui Grundmann The Honorable James F. Holderman (Retired) Martin F. Hockey, Jr. Matthias Kamber Nathan K. Kelley Kevin Parton Robert L. Stoll Deanna Tanner Okun David O. Taylor John M. Whealan United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Rules of Practice, Revised: March 2016 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ............................................................................ 1 AMENDMENTS AND REVISIONS CONTAINED IN THIS EDITION ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Counsel: Continued Uncertainty Over Patentable
    June 25, 2013 Continued Uncertainty Over Patentable Subject Matter Mark Baghdassarian and Matthew F. Abbott The Federal Circuit has long a computerized trading platform that struggled to clarify the standard for uses an intermediary to mitigate determining whether a computer- risks in trading stocks or currency, implemented invention is patent- finding the claims were directed to an ineligible because it falls under abstract idea and therefore ineligible the “abstract idea” exception to for patent protection. On appeal, a patentability. Most recently, in CLS panel of the Federal Circuit reversed, Mark Matthew Bank Int’l v. Alice Corp. Pty., Ltd., and subsequently the court agreed to Baghdassarian Abbott No. 2011-1301, an en banc Federal hear the case en banc. The en banc Circuit confronted this issue directly court issued a two-paragraph per but could not reach a consensus on is promoted when subjective and curiam opinion, affirming the district the applicable standard, resulting in empty words like “contribution” or court ruling that all claims were six opinions by the 10 sitting judges. “inventiveness” are offered up by ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The core of the disagreement focused the courts to determine investment, on how expansively the abstract idea resource allocation, and business Judge Lourie’s Opinion exception to patentability should be decisions . Judge Alan Lourie, joined by applied, and how to interpret the As I start my next quarter century Judges Timothy Dyk, Sharon Prost, U.S. Supreme Court’s “inventive of judicial experience, I am sure that Jimmie Reyna, and Evan Wallach concept” requirement to the abstract one day I will reflect on this moment (the “Lourie Group”), found each idea exception pursuant to Mayo as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Courts of the United States
    66 U.S. GOVERNMENT MANUAL of Decisions, the Librarian, the Marshal, Court Term The term of the Court the Director of Budget and Personnel, begins on the first Monday in October the Court Counsel, the Curator, the and lasts until the first Monday in Director of Data Systems, and the Public October of the next year. Approximately Information Officer. 8,000 cases are filed with the Court in Appellate Jurisdiction Appellate the course of a term, and some 1,000 jurisdiction has been conferred upon the applications of various kinds are filed Supreme Court by various statutes under each year that can be acted upon by a the authority given Congress by the single Justice. Constitution. The basic statute effective at this time in conferring and controlling Access to Facilities The Supreme Court jurisdiction of the Supreme Court may is open to the public from 9 a.m. to 4:30 be found in 28 U.S.C. 1251, 1253, p.m., Monday through Friday, except on 1254, 1257–1259, and various special Federal holidays. Unless the Court or statutes. Congress has no authority to Chief Justice orders otherwise, the change the original jurisdiction of this Clerk’s office is open from 9 a.m. to 5 Court. p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Rulemaking Power Congress has from Federal legal holidays. The library is time to time conferred upon the open to members of the bar of the Court, Supreme Court power to prescribe rules attorneys for the various Federal of procedure to be followed by the departments and agencies, and Members lower courts of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • When the Supreme Court Ruled in June 2014 That Induced
    http://www.law360.com/in-depth/articles/814461?nl_pk=7545a5b5-6a94-47d3-8aa3- 2e19884905c5&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=in-depth When the Supreme Court ruled in June 2014 that induced infringement can be found only when one party performs every step of a patent, the high court didn’t just overturn a Federal Circuit decision expanding liability for induced infringement to include companies that perform only some steps, it cast into doubt the Federal Circuit’s overall approach to patent infringement. “The Federal Circuit’s analysis fundamentally misunderstands what it means to infringe a method patent,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote for a unanimous court in Limelight Networks Inc. v. Akamai Technologies Inc. “The Federal Circuit’s contrary view would ... require the courts to develop two parallel bodies of infringement law.” The sharp criticism was all the more awkward coming from a court made up of mostly generalists and directed at the appeals court that was formed more than three decades ago with the mission to unify patent law. But it wasn’t the first time the Supreme Court came down hard on the Federal Circuit, and in all likelihood, it won’t be the last. The Supreme Court has taken a greater interest in patent cases over the past 15 years and is showing no hesitance in reversing the Federal Circuit. In response, the appeals court has been handing down decisions that show some obstinance in bending to the high court, signaling a tussle between the two courts over who should have the final say on patent law. More recently, the Federal Circuit has shown signs that it is laying low by issuing fewer dissents, relying on nonprecedential decisions and taking more cases en banc.
    [Show full text]