DOCSLIB.ORG

CMJ 57-21 Abortion in Thailand.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CMJ 57-21 Abortion in Thailand.Indd Review article The hidden problems of illegal abortions in Thailand Orawee Chinthakanan, M.D.,1 Roger W. Rochat, M.D.,2 Nuntana Morakote, MPH,1 and Somsak Chaovisitseree, M.D.1 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chiang Mai University, 2Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA High rates of unplanned pregnancy and induced abortion were reported among young women in Thailand. Complications from illegal and low standard abortion are a current major health problem in the country. Abortion is considered to be a life-destroying act that counts as a serious bap (sin or demerit) in Thai culture. The current abortion law in Thailand stipulates that abortion is illegal except when performed by a medical practitioner in circumstances considered necessary when the pregnancy endangers the woman’s health or conception had occurred during a sexual offense such as rape or incest. However, most Thai people feel that the abortion law should be amended because Thai society has changed radically in its attitudes over the past decade. The debate over legal reform of this law is still active. Thailand needs a multi-disciplinary approach to reduce and prevent the number of unplanned pregnancies and unsafe abortions, with special attention paid to the most vulnerable group of women. Chiang Mai Medical Journal 2014;53(4):187-91. Keywords: abortion, Thailand, Law, legalized abortion, unplanned pregnancy Introduction The recent revelation of 2,002 dead fetuses port to help with their unplanned and unwanted found in a Buddhist temple in Bangkok enlight- pregnancy. They might have been raped and ened people of the hidden problem of illegal did not seek medical attention or experienced abortion in Thailand. The remains were widely an unexpected pregnancy from failure to use believed to have come from many illegal abor- contraception. They possibly had little or no tion clinics in the city[1]. Complications from money for receiving a standard and safe abor- illegal and low standard abortions are a current tion. Therefore, the attempt to self-induce ter- major health problem in the country. A woman mination of a pregnancy would be dangerous dies every eight minutes worldwide from medi- and probably unsuccessful. On the other hand, cal complications as a consequence of unsafe these women might seek an unqualifi ed surgeon, abortion[2]. These victims were likely young who is relatively inexpensive, to terminate the people, perhaps teenagers, living in rural ar- pregnancy. Sadly, many of these women have eas and having little or no family or social sup- died from medical complications as a result of Address correspondence to: Orawee Chinthakanan, M.D., Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200 Thailand. E-mail: [email protected] Received September 4, 2014, and in revised form December 27, 2014. 188 Chiang Mai Med J 2014;53(4): unsafe abortions. Intervention in order to pre- Problems arising from the Thai abor- vent unwanted pregnancy is the key for solving tion law hidden problems of unsafe abortions, by expand- The current abortion law in Thailand became ing access to modern contraceptive methods, effective in 1956. Section 301-305 of the Crimi- providing safe abortion to the full extent of the nal Code of Thailand stipulates that abortion law, and tackling legal and programmatic barriers is illegal except when performed by a medical against receiving a safe abortion. practitioner in circumstances considered neces- sary when the pregnancy endangers the wom- The situation of abortion in Thailand an’s health or conception had occurred during a A total of 45.5 million induced abortions sexual offense such as rape or incest. A woman accounted for over one-fi fth of approximately also can be criminalized if she allows someone 210 million pregnancies reported worldwide in to perform an illegal abortion on her[10]. Several 1995. These aggregate numbers translated into problems have been raised from the interpreta- a pregnancy rate worldwide of 160 pregnan- tion and implementation of this law. cies per 1,000 women aged between 15 and 44 Firstly, there is no clear defi nition of “health” years old[3]. A high rate of induced abortion was in this law, and the whole range of physical and reported among young women in Thailand as mental health, including social well-being as de- well. Thailand was ranked fi rst for teenage preg- fi ned by the WHO, is not explicit. The courts tend nancy, which accounted for 17.2% of live births to interpret health in the narrow context of physi- in 2009[4,5]. Of those, 40.7% were unintended cal health only. In 2001, the Thai Medical Coun- pregnancies[6]. A study conducted in govern- cil requested an interpretation of the meaning ment hospitals revealed that of 13,090 cases of of health in the law. The Royal Institute there- induced abortion, 47% were in women younger fore provided a broader interpretation, including than 25 years old. Also, 21% of these young fe- both physical and mental health, but it had no males were adolescents with little or no access juridical power. Secondly, although incest is not to contraception[7]. The most common reason mentioned in the Code, in practice, medical pro- for induced abortion was the pregnant women’s fessionals consider incest as a form of rape and strong desire to continue their education[8]. abortion is generally provided. Thirdly, in cas- Over 61% of pregnant women were younger es of women seeking abortion because of rape, than 25 years of age, and underwent an abor- physicians are required under the Criminal Code tion performed by providers outside the stand- to obtain proof of the crime and permission for ard health care system. Thirty percent of these an abortion from the police. However, in reali- were teens. Furthermore, only 29% of abortions ty, most women are deterred from reporting rape performed outside the health care system were to the police. Therefore, such women resort to in the hands of qualifi ed health care personnel unsafe abortion or continued pregnancy, due to such as physicians, obstetricians, nurses or mid- the lack of proof and refusal by the physician to wives. Therefore, high numbers of severe medi- operate. Lastly, the law does not cover fetal in- cal complications from illegal abortion carried dications. In 1995, a report stated that a medical out by unqualifi ed personnel were reported[7]. school had been charged with violating the abor- The World Health Organization (WHO) estimat- tion law, as it reportedly terminated 362 preg- ed that the annual incidence of unsafe abortions nancies between 1981 and 1985 for women with in Thailand during 2003 was between 20 and 29 rubella infection, as a result of severe congenital cases per 1,000 women aged between 15 and 44 malformation[11]. years old[9]. The debate over legal reform of this law start- ed in 1973. The reform bill was passed in 1981 in Chinthakanan O, et al. Abortion in Thailand 189 the House of Representatives, but later defeated the Theravada school. Abortion is considered to in the Senate in 1983. Primarily, this was due be a life-destroying act that counts as a serious to lobbying from a leader of a broad-based re- bap (sin or demerit). Many women have cited ligious coalition, who continues to be a central this fear of bap as the main reason for continuing fi gure in the anti-reform movement. The various their unplanned pregnancy. In contrast to Bud- governments that followed this have not taken dhism in Thailand, Buddhists in Japan fi nd abor- up the efforts to legislate reform on this issue[10]. tion more acceptable. The Japanese practice of According to a large-scale hospital-based sur- mizuko rites involves the parents praying for the vey on abortion in Thailand, several indications well-being of the aborted fetuses in their rejected of abortion remain controversial, as to whether “lives”[12]. Following the discovery of 2,002 they should be included in legal reforms. These fetuses dumped in a Bangkok temple, Suan “illegal” indications for abortion are unlikely to Dusit Rajabhat University conducted a survey of be legalized in the near future. Consequently, 1,458 people living in Thailand’s capital and its abortion will remain a politically sensitive issue, neighboring provinces during December 2010. which has been sensationalized in the press in The survey showed that 65.6% of respondents order to counter reform efforts. felt that the abortion law should be amended A recent debatable issue on reproductive because Thai society has changed its attitudes health concerned a law to protect the right to radically over the past decade. More than 62% educate pregnant students. In 2010, the Ministry of participants in the survey said that they could of Public Health introduced a draft law; “Com- not comprehend why there were so many abor- prehensive Reproductive Health”, which aims to tions, and about 15% said abortion was a sin and allow pregnant students to continue their study[5]. should be illegal. However, nearly half of the re- In general, schools lack clear guidelines on spondents (47%) said it was an individual right whether to allow pregnant students to remain in to have an abortion depending on their need. The schools, and decisions depend on the school ex- poll’s margin of error was 5 percent, according ecutives. Within the law, all schools must allow to the survey’s administrators[11]. pregnant students to continue their study, unless they prefer otherwise. In addition, the key con- Voices of Thai Physicians on Abortion tents of the draft law include the rights to access The number of Obstetricians and Gynecolo- reproductive health services, maternal leave, gists (OB/GYN) in Thailand is disproportion- and age-appropriate sex education for students.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Review of Sexuality and Reproductive Health and Rights in Thailand
    A Review of Sexuality and Reproductive Health and Rights in Thailand Prepared for the Ford Foundation Office for Vietnam and Thailand Hanoi, Vietnam May – August 2006 Siriporn Yongpanichkul, consultant based in Bangkok, Thailand, wrote this report for the Sexuality and Reproductive Health program of the Ford Foundation office for Vietnam and Thailand, in Hanoi Vietnam. The report was written May - August 2006 and finalized in May 2007. Martha Ann Overland, journalist and editor, based in Hanoi, Vietnam, edited the report. Susan Y. Wood, Program Officer for Sexuality and Reproductive Health, the Ford Foundation, Hanoi, provided oversight and editorial support. Any part of this report may be copied or adapted provided that the author and source is identified. The Ford Foundation Office for Vietnam and Thailand Pacific Place 83B Ly Thuong Kiet Street, 14th floor Hanoi, Vietnam Tel.: (844) 946-1428 or 946-1418 Fax: (844) 946-1417 Email: [email protected] 2 Table of Contents Abbreviations 4 I. Executive Summary and Introduction 5 II. Success and Shortcomings of Sexual and Reproductive Health 8 Overview 8 Reproductive health service programs 9 HIV/AIDS and STIs 10 - The rights of people living with HIV 11 Adolescent sexual and reproductive health 12 Safe induced abortion 13 Gender-based violence 15 Reproductive health of women in vulnerable groups 17 III. Challenges and Opportunities for SRH Program Implementation 19 Opportunities 19 Challenges 20 Funding for SRH 21 IV. Looking forward 23 Recommended issues to be addressed 23 Strategies
    [Show full text]
  • Commodifying Karma: Abortion Discourses and Kaekam Practices in Thai Society
    COMMODIFYING KARMA: ABORTION DISCOURSES AND KAEKAM PRACTICES IN THAI SOCIETY A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Moodjalin Sudcharoen May 2013 © 2013 Moodjalin Sudcharoen ABSTRACT In Thailand, abortion received little attention until the 1980s, when some social activists introduced legal reforms that would have legalized the practice, but they failed to achieve their goals. From the 1990s to the present, abortion became a topic of popular discourses as Buddhism became increasingly commodified. Entrepreneurs introduced ways for women who have had abortions to pay for services that would ameliorate their bad karma; this is known as the trend of kaekam. While the dominant discourse has long depicted abortion as a life-destroying act from a Buddhist perspective, the emphasis on embodied karma in the form of vengeful child ghosts, the ability to change one’s karma through certain rituals, and confessions by those involved in abortions is all recent. I argue that these phenomena not only dominate public discussions and perpetuate abortion stigma, but also allow some groups to gain economic benefit from the fear of the negative effects of the karma incurred through various forms of the karma business. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Moodjalin Sudcharoen, nicknamed Mood, was born in Bangkok, Thailand, in February 1988. From 1994 to 2006, she studied at Assumption Convent School, Bangkok. Afterwards, she spent four years as an Honors Program student of the Department of Thai, Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, and received a Bachelor’s degree (1st class honors) in March 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Separated by Borders United in Need an Assessment of Reproductive Health on the Thailand-Burma Border Separated by Borders, United in Need
    SEPARATED BY BORDERS UNITED IN NEED An assessment of reproductive health on the Thailand-Burma border Separated by borders, united in need An assessment of reproductive health on the Thailand-Burma border Authors Margaret Hobstetter, JD, MPH Meredith Walsh, MPH, RN Jennifer Leigh, MPH Catherine I. Lee, MPH Cari Sietstra, JD Angel M. Foster, DPhil, MD, AM Acknowledgements This project would not have been possible without the support we received from Sarah Redlich, the Richard and Rhoda Goldman Fund, Fordham Law School, and Therese Caouette. We would like to express our gratitude to the many organizations and individuals that participated in the interviews, service mapping exercise, and focus group discussions which served as the basis for this needs assessment. Finally, we are grateful for Norda Prisangdat’s assistance with translation and focus group discussion facilitation. Graphic design & photographs Graphic design by Nancy Chuang. Photographs by Nancy Chuang: Mae Tao Clinic Reproductive Health Department, Tak Province, Thailand (cover, p.5, 8, 12, 14, 19, 23, 33, 41, 43); Mae Tao Clinic Child Outpatient Department, Tak Province, Thailand (p.7); Rim Moei river crossing between Thailand and Burma, Tak Province, Thailand (p.3, 9); Migrant communities in Tak Province, Thailand (p.27, 29); Refugees crossing at border, Tak Province, Thailand (p.37). Photograph by Becky Hurwitz: Mae Tao Clinic Reproductive Health Department, Tak Province, Thailand (p.24). Suggested citation Hobstetter M, Walsh M, Leigh J, Lee C, Sietstra C, Foster A. Separated by borders, united in need: An assessment of reproductive health on the Thailand-Burma border. Cambridge, MA: Ibis Reproductive Health, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 1 2 Fall 2007
    Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 1 2 Fall 2007 Columbia University Journal of Bioethics And Supplement on BIOCEP Volume VI. No 1, Fall 2007 Editorial Board Faculty Editors Editors-in-Chief Dr. John D. Loike Ashley Pandolfi Dr. Ruth L. Fischbach Michael Peluso Cover Design: “Entwine‖ Copy Editors Dana Balitzer, Kim Atiyeh, Soo Han, Dr. John D. Loike Ashley Pandolfi, Ben Stern, Please send your comments Kathryn Vreeland, to Dr. John D. Loike Alisha Sachchathep, at: [email protected] Zahrah Taufique, Diana Zhou Web Version is available through the undergraduate page: http://www.columbia.edu/cu/ Or through http://www.bioethicscolumbia.org/ Copyright 2007 by: Columbia University Center for Bioethics NO PART OF THIS JOURNAL MAY BE COPIED OR USED WITHOUT PERMISSION. All views in the articles reflect those of the authors only. Columbia University Journal of Bioethics 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. 5 Introductions by Dr. John Loike and Dr. Ruth Fischbach ............ …………………………………..…….6-7 Section I: Genetics The Twist about Gene Patenting Elizabeth Cedars Kimberly Atiyeh ......................................8-11 Athletics and Stem Cells Dana Balitzer Mikilena Greusel.………………….........12-14 Generation XY Mikilena Greusel Benjamin Stern………………….……….15-16 Section II: Reproductive Medicine Full Stop: The End-of-Line for Periods? Kimberly Atiyeh Benjamin Stern……………………….….17-20 Prevalence of Birth Defects in ART Infants
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Legal Restrictions, Regulatory Reform, and Geographic Disparities in Abortion Access in Thailand Article (Accepted Version) (Refereed)
    Grady Arnott, Grace Sheehy, Orawee Chinthakanan, and Angel M. Foster Exploring legal restrictions, regulatory reform, and geographic disparities in abortion access in Thailand Article (Accepted version) (Refereed) Original citation: Arnott, Grady and Sheehy, Grace and Chinthakanan, Orawee and Foster, Angel M. (2017) Exploring legal restrictions, regulatory reform, and geographic disparities in abortion access in Thailand. Health and Human Rights Journal, 19 (1). ISSN 2150-4113 Reuse of this item is permitted through licensing under the Creative Commons: © 2017 The Author(s) © CC-BY 3.0 This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/83646/ Available in LSE Research Online: July 2017 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. 24/07/2017 Exploring Legal Restrictions, Regulatory Reform, and Geographic Disparities in Abortion Access in Thailand | Health and Human Rights J… ABOUT HHR ARCHIVES SUBMISSIONS BLOG PERSPECTIVES CONSORTIUM Search RESOURCES Macro- and Micro-Political Vernaculizations of Rights: Human Rights and Abortion Discourses in BLOG POSTS Northern Ireland UK Abortion Help for NI Women Offers a Decriminalization and Women’s Access to Abortion in Australia Partial Solution Drug Pricing Executive Order: Likely Win for Exploring Legal Restrictions, Pharma WHO Budget Commitments Disappoint Global Regulatory Reform, and Geographic Health Advocates New WHO Director-General Embraces Disparities in Abortion Access in Universal Coverage, Cancer Focus Urged Thailand PAPERS IN PRESS on JUNE 2, 2017 · in VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1 The Cholera Epidemic in Zimbabwe, 2008- Grady Arnott, Grace Sheehy, Orawee Chinthakanan, and Angel M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Abortion Policies, Programmes and Services in the South-East Asia Region
    Mapping abortion policies, programmes and services in the South-East Asia Region Mapping abortion policies, programmes and services in the WHO South-East Asia Region WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication data World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia. Mapping abortion policies, programmes and services in the WHO South-East Asia Region. 1. Abortion, Induced 2. Abortion, Legal - trends 3. Maternal Mortality - statistics and numerical data 4. Contraception 5. ISBN 978-92-9022-436-5 (NLM classification: WQ 440) © World Health Organization 2013 All rights reserved. Requests for publications, or for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – can be obtained from Bookshop, World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, Indraprastha Estate, Mahatma Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 002, India (fax: +91 11 23370197; e-mail: [email protected]). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion Worldwide: a Decade of Uneven Progress
    Abortion Worldwide: A Decade of Uneven Progress Abortion Worldwide: A Decade of Uneven Progress Susheela Singh Deirdre Wulf Rubina Hussain Akinrinola Bankole Gilda Sedgh Acknowledgments Abortion Worldwide: A Decade of Uneven Progress was Junice L. Demeterio-Melgar, Likhaan (Philippines); Teresa written by Susheela Singh, Rubina Hussain, Akinrinola DePiñeres, University of California, San Francisco, and Bankole and Gilda Sedgh, all of the Guttmacher Institute, Fundación Oriéntame and Fundación Educación para la and Deirdre Wulf, independent consultant. The report was Salud Reproductiva (USA and Colombia); Fariyal Fikree edited by Peter Doskoch and copyedited by Haley Ball; and Rhonda Smith, Population Reference Bureau (USA); Kathleen Randall supervised production. Beth Fredrick, formerly of the International Women’s Health Coalition (USA); Aurélie Gal and Serge Rabier, The authors thank the following colleagues for their com- Équilibres et Populations (France); Sandra Garcia, ments and help in developing this report: Elena Prada and Population Council (Mexico); Agnès Guillaume, Institut Michael Vlassoff, for reviewing the literature; Alison National d’Études Démographiques–Institut de Recherche Gemmill, for providing research support throughout the pour le Développement (France); Ana Langer, project; and Ann Biddlecom, Sharon Camp, Susan A. EngenderHealth (USA); Katarina Lindahl, Lars Olsson, Cohen, Leila Darabi, Patricia Donovan, Stanley K. Christina Rogala and Ann Svensén, Swedish Association Henshaw, Ann Moore, Cory L. Richards and Gustavo for Sexuality Education (Sweden); Roland Edgar Mhlanga, Suárez, for reviewing drafts of the report. Special thanks Nelson Mandela School of Medicine (South Africa); Joana are due to Jacqueline E. Darroch and Stanley Henshaw Nerquaye-Tetteh, Planned Parenthood Association of for assistance with data interpretation and to Evert Ghana (retired; Ghana); Friday Okonofua, Women’s Ketting for providing data from various European coun- Health Action and Resource Centre (Nigeria); Boniface tries.
    [Show full text]
  • Unsafe Abortion
    Unsafe abortion Global and regional estimates of the incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000 Fourth edition World Health Organization Geneva, 2004 WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data World Health Organization. Unsafe abortion: global and regional estimates of incidence of unsafe abortion and associated mortality in 2000. -- 4th ed. 1.Abortion, Induced - epidemiology 2.Abortion, Induced - mortality 3.Review literature I.Title. ISBN 92 4 159180 3 (NLM classification: WQ 440) © World Health Organization, 2004 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from Marketing and Dissemination, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel: +41 22 791 2476; fax: +41 22 791 4857; email: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications—whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution— should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: [email protected]). The methodology of estimation has been reviewed and cleared for publication by Claudia Stein of the Evidence and Information for Policy (EIP) Cluster. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Abortion, Sin and the State in Thailand
    Abortion, Sin and the State in Thailand Abortion is one of the most controversial issues of our age, yet most studies centre on the debate in Western countries. This book discusses abortion in Thailand, where, although abortion is illegal, between 200,000 and 300,000 abortions are performed each year by a variety of methods. Based on extensive original research in the field, the book analyses the abortion debate in Thailand, including stories of the real-life dilemmas facing women, situational ethics, popular representations of abortion in the media, the history and the politics of the debate. The work highlights women’s subjective experiences and perceptions of abortion, and places these ‘women’s stories’in an analysis of broader conflicts over gender, religion, nationalism and modernity, and the global politics of reproductive health. Andrea Whittaker is a Joint Lecturer at the Key Centre for Women’s Health in Society and the Melbourne Institute of Asian Languages and Societies, University of Melbourne. She is a medical anthropologist whose primary research interests relate to reproductive health, gender and development in Thailand and Australia. Her previous books include Intimate Knowledge: Women and their health in North-East Thailand. Asian Studies Association of Australia Women in Asia Series Editor: Louise Edwards (Australian National University) Editorial Board: Susan Blackburn (Monash University) John Butcher (Griffith University) Vera Mackie (Curtin University) Anne McLaren (Melbourne University) Mina Roces (University of New
    [Show full text]
  • Case from THAILAND
    Ministry of Public Health The Royal Thai Government Development of Safe Abortion Service in Thailand Case from THAILAND December 2020 Sharing Best Practices - THAILAND Biography of the Consultant Dr. Bancha Kakhong, M.D. Deputy Director-General Department of Health Ministry of Public Health, Thailand Peerayoot Sanugul Dr. Peerayoot Sanugul, M.D. Director Bureau of Reproductive Health Department of Health Ministry of Public Health, Thailand Sharing Best Practices - THAILAND Table of Contents Content Page # Foreword .................................................................................................................. 1 Overview .................................................................................................................. 4 Implementing Institutions / Development Actors ...................................................... 6 Summary: brief overview of the practice and overview of objectives and results .... 6 Background and Justification, Including Origin of the Project .................................. 7 Goals and Principles ................................................................................................ 8 Description of Activities, Achievements, Outcomes and Impacts ............................. 8 Partnerships ............................................................................................................. 16 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................................... 18 Successes and Lessons Learned ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Induced Abortion in Thailand: Current Situation in Public Hospitals and Legal Perspectives Suwanna Warakamina Nongluk Boonthaia Viroj Tangcharoensathienb
    A 2004 Reproductive Health Matters. All rights reserved. Reproductive Health Matters 2004;12(24 Supplement):147–156 0968-8080/04 $ – see front matter PII: S0 968 -808 0(0 4)24 018-6 www.rhm-elsevier.com ISBN 0-9531210-2-X www.rhmjournal.org.uk Induced Abortion in Thailand: Current Situation in Public Hospitals and Legal Perspectives Suwanna Warakamina Nongluk Boonthaia Viroj Tangcharoensathienb a Reproductive Health Division, Department of Health, Ministry of Public Health, Thailand b Senior Research Scholar Programme in Health Economics and Financing, International Health Policy Programme, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Abortion is illegal in Thailand unless the woman’s health is at risk or pregnancy is due to rape. This study, carried out in 1999 in 787 government hospitals, examined the magnitude and profile of abortion in Thailand, using data collected prospectively through a review of 45,990 case records (of which 28.5% were classified as induced and 71.5% as spontaneous abortions) and face-to-face interviews with a sub-set of 1,854 women patients. The estimated induced abortion ratio was 19.5 per 1,000 live births. Almost half the induced abortions were in young women under 25 years of age, many of whom had little or no access to contraception. Socio-economic reasons accounted for 60.2% of abortions. Serious complications were observed in almost a third of cases, especially following abortions performed by non-health personnel. Government physicians’ current provision of induced abortion went beyond the provisions of the law in almost half of cases, most commonly for intrauterine death and for congenital anomalies.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Buddhist Ethics Volume 5, 1998:22-48
    ISSN 1076-9005 Volume 5 1998:22-48 Publication date: 1 February 1998 Abortion in Thailand: a Feminist Perspective By Malee Lerdmaleewong, R.N., M.N. Associate Director School of Nursing and Nursing Service Department Ramathibodi Hospital Associate Professor, Faculty of Medicine Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand Email: [email protected] and Caroline Francis, B.A., M.A. Visiting Lecturer Center of Human Resources Development Faculty of Graduate Studies Mahidol University Bangkok, Thailand © 1998 Malee Lerdmaleewong and Caroline Francis JBE Research Article Research JBE Copyright Notice Digital copies of this work may be made and distributed provided no charge is made and no alteration is made to the content. Reproduction in any other format with the exception of a single copy for private study requires the written permission of the author. All enquiries to [email protected]. Journal of Buddhist Ethics Volume 5, 1998:22-48 ABSTRACT With the passing of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing, China, womenÕs issues in Asia have moved increasingly to the forefront. One such issue, abortion, continues to generate controversy as many women argue for protection and/or recognition of their reproductive rights. The objectives of this paper are threefold: (1) To examine the abortion debate in Thailand, identifying issues raised by Thai feminist scholars about the status of women; (2) To overview some of the more prominent feminist arguments regarding abortion (particularly those written by Ca- nadian and American scholars) as a tool for defining womenÕs reproduc- tive rights; (3) To focus on a study of attitudes toward abortion among health care personnel and post-induced abortion patients in Bangkok, Thailand in order to discern the degree of support (if any) for feminist abortion arguments.
    [Show full text]