USDA Newsletter in This Issue

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

USDA Newsletter in This Issue ARIZONA USDA Newsletter In this issue... U.S. Department of Agriculture 1 USDA and NASA Expand Innovative Partnership to Better (USDA) Predict Wildfires, Monitor Drought from Space 2 USDA Adds More Eligible USDA and NASA they deal with the ongoing impacts Commodities for Farm Storage Expand Innovative of climate change and drought. Facility Loans Partnership to Better Perhaps most importantly, this 2 USDA Opens Enrollment partnership will expose more Period for Agriculture Risk Predict Wildfires, young people to the power of Coverage and Price Loss Coverage Monitor Drought from science and innovation to solve Safety-Net Programs Space 2 Enrollment for 2016 Dairy some of the world’s most pressing Margin Protection Program Started challenges.” July 1 Updated Memorandum of “There are many areas where 3 USDA Announces Restart Understanding strengthens research NASA and USDA have of Biomass Crop Assistance and data sharing, promotes overlapping interests,” said Program for Renewable Energy STEM and agriculture to younger NASA’s Deputy Administrator 3 Acreage Reporting Deadlines generations Dava Newman. “We can now 3 September Surveys better coordinate and build on the 3 Reports and Publications MOFFETT FIELD, California, resources of both NASA and the 4 Desert Farmer Focuses Agriculture Deputy Secretary USDA to help learn more about our on Soil Health to Improve on- Krysta Harden and NASA Deputy planet’s vital resources and inspire farm Water Retention, Irrigation Administrator Dava Newman today the next generation to become Efficiency 4 Weekly Water and announced an expanded partnership better stewards of our planet.” 4 Climate Update between the United States Among other things, the agreement 4 Conservation Connection Department of Agriculture (USDA) will expand cooperation on space- Newsletter is available! and the National Aeronautics and borne remote sensing efforts to 5 USDA Expands Crop Space Administration (NASA) gather soil moisture data. One Insurance Options For Fruit And designed to better protect potential outcome of the expanded Nut Producers 5 Don’t Miss Crop Insurance America’s working lands, predict partnership between USDA and Deadlines and prevent natural disasters, and NASA could be using satellite data 6 Rural Broadband Access inspire young people to pursue to create a series of soil moisture Loan and Loan Guaranteed being careers in science, technology, maps for California that could offered by USDA RD engineering, mathematics and be used to improve weather and 6 Arizona Energy Masters agriculture. water availability forecasting and Course begins October 8 6 Economic Development “Space is a unique laboratory provide a drought early-warning Administration (EDA) offering that can be a gateway to solving system to producers, particularly in funding for regional innovation some of the greatest agricultural California. challenges of our time,” says Under the new agreement... Deputy Secretary Harden. “This partnership is a powerful Full story here: opportunity for USDA and NASA http://go.usa.gov/36xWJ to yield new tools and techniques to help farmers and ranchers as August Arizona USDA Newsletter 1 USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer Farm Service Agency (FSA) Since 2000, more than 35,000 short grain and sweet rice), USDA Adds More facility loans have been safflower seed, sesame, soybeans, Eligible Commodities for approved totaling $2 billion in sunflower seed and wheat. Upland Farm Storage Facility rural investments. On average, cotton is no longer a covered about 1,600 new loans are made commodity. For more information Loans each year. Producers do not on the program visit www.fsa. need to demonstrate the lack of usda.gov/arc-plc. To enroll in the USDA Adds More Eligible commercial credit availability to program please contact your local Commodities for Farm Storage apply. The loans are designed to FSA office https://offices.usda.gov Facility Loans assist a diverse range of farming operations, including small and WASHINGTON, Aug. 17, 2015 Enrollment for 2016 mid-sized businesses, new farmers, – U.S. Department of Agriculture Dairy Margin Protection operations supplying local food and (USDA) Farm Service Agency Program Started July 1 farmers markets, non-traditional (FSA) Administrator Val Dolcini As of July 1, 2015, dairy farmers farm products, and underserved today announced that the Farm can enroll in Margin Protection producers. Storage Facility Loan (FSFL) Program (MPP) for coverage in To learn more about the FSA program, which provides low- 2016. Farm Storage Facility Loan, visit interest financing to producers to www.fsa.usda.gov/pricesupport or build or upgrade storage facilities, MPP gives participating dairy contact a local FSA county office. will now include dairy, flowers and producers the flexibility to select To find your local FSA county meats as eligible commodities. coverage levels best suited for their office, visit http://offices.usda.gov. “For 15 years, this program has operation. Enrollment begins July provided affordable financing, 1 and ends on Sept. 30, 2015, for allowing American farmers and USDA Opens Enrollment coverage in 2016. Participating ranchers to construct or expand Period for Agriculture farmers will remain in the program storage on the farm,” said Dolcini. Risk Coverage and Price through 2018 and pay a $100 “By adding eligible commodities, Loss Coverage Safety- administrative fee each year. these low-interest loans will help Net Programs Producers also have the option of even more family farmers and Eligible producers may now selecting a different coverage level ranchers to expand on-site storage.” formally enroll in the Agriculture during open enrollment each year. The new commodities eligible Risk Coverage (ARC) and Price for facility loans include Loss Coverage (PLC) programs USDA also has an online resource floriculture, hops, rye, milk, for 2014 and 2015. The enrollment available to help dairy producers cheese, butter, yogurt, meat and period began June 17, 2015, and decide which level of coverage will poultry (unprocessed), eggs, and will end Sept. 30, 2015. provide them with the strongest aquaculture (excluding systems safety net under a variety of that maintain live animals through ARC and PLC provide financial conditions. The enhanced Web tool, uptake and discharge of water). protections for agricultural available at www.fsa.usda.gov/ Commodities already eligible producers when market forces mpptool , allows dairy farmers to for the loans include corn, grain cause substantial drops in crop quickly and easily combine their sorghum, rice, soybeans, oats, prices or revenues. Covered unique operation data and other peanuts, wheat, barley, minor commodities under ARC and PLC key variables to calculate their oilseeds harvested as whole grain, include barley, canola, large and coverage needs based on price pulse crops (lentils, chickpeas and small chickpeas, corn, crambe, projections. Producers can also dry peas), hay, honey, renewable flaxseed, grain sorghum, lentils, review historical data or estimate biomass, and fruits, nuts and mustard seed, oats, peanuts, dry future coverage based on data vegetables for cold storage peas, rapeseed, long grain rice, projections. The secure site can facilities. medium grain rice (which includes be accessed via computer, mobile phone, or tablet, 24 hours a day, August Arizona USDA Newsletter 2 USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer seven days a week. summer and accepted through use of “cover only,” “green fall 2015, with new project area manure,” “left standing,” or For more information, visit FSA announcements and enrollments “seed” then the acreage must online at www.fsa.usda.gov/dairy taking place in early spring 2016. be reported by July 15. for more information, or stop by The extended proposal submission For Noninsured Crop Disaster a local FSA office to learn more period allows project sponsors Assistance Program (NAP) policy about MPP. To find a local FSA time to complete any needed holders, the acreage reporting office in your area, visithttp:// environmental assessments and date for NAP covered crops is the offices.usda.gov allows producers enough lead earlier of the dates listed above or time to make informed decisions 15 calendar days before grazing USDA Announces on whether or not to pursue the or harvesting of the crop begins. Restart of Biomass Crop BCAP project area enrollment For questions regarding crop Assistance Program for opportunity. For more information, certification and crop loss reports, visit www.usda.gov. please contact your local FSA Renewable Energy County Office http://offices.usda. Incentives will resume this gov. summer for farmers, ranchers and Acreage Reporting forest landowners interested in Deadlines growing and harvesting biomass In order to comply with FSA National for renewable energy. The support program eligibility requirements comes through the Biomass Crop and avoid late file fees, all Agricultural Assistance Program (BCAP), producers are encouraged to visit which provides financial assistance their local County FSA office Statistics Service to establish and maintain new crops to file an accurate, timely crop (NASS) of energy biomass, or who harvest certification report. The following and deliver forest or agricultural acreage reporting dates apply for September Surveys residues to a qualifying energy producers in Arizona: The major surveys conducted are facility. the September Agricultural Survey November 15, 2015: Alfalfa, and the Off-Farm Grain Stocks Financial
Recommended publications
  • Risk Management Agency
    2020 USDA EXPLANATORY NOTES – RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY Agency-Wide ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Purpose Statement ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 OIG and GAO Reports ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Available Funds and Staff Years .............................................................................................................................. 4 Permanent Positions by Grade and Staff Years ........................................................................................................ 5 Vehicle Fleet ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 Shared Funding Projects- .......................................................................................................................................... 7 Account 1: Salaries and Expenses ................................................................................................................................. 9 Lead-Off Tabular Statement ..................................................................................................................................... 9 Appropriations Language.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Relative Cost Effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency’S Farm Loan Programs
    United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency Economic Policy Analysis Staff August 2006 Report to Congress Evaluating the Relative Cost Effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency’s Farm Loan Programs Charles Dodson Steven Koenig* *Agricultural Economists, Economic Policy Analysis Staff, Farm Service Agency, 3741 SB, 202-720-3451,[email protected], [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Valuable comments and suggestions were provided by the Farm Service Agency’s Office of the Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs during the course of drafting the report. Chris Beyerhelm, Assistant Deputy Administrator, and Jim Radintz, Director, Loan Making Division, had primary responsibility for these comments and suggestions. Sheila Oellrich, Loan Servicing and Property Management Division, provided valuable assistance in developing data necessary to complete the report. Technical guidance and suggestions were provided by Joy Harwood, Director, and Terry Hickenbotham, of the Farm Service Agency’s Economic and Policy Analysis Staff. Members of a USDA Advisory Working Group for the report provided helpful comments and suggestions, including Joe Glauber (Office of the Chief Economist), David Grahn (Office of the General Counsel), Jim Staiert (Office of Budget and Program Analysis), Pat Sullivan, (Economic Research Service), and Dennis Taitano (Farm Service Agency, Budget Division). Jerome Stam, retired Senior Economist at USDA's Economic Research Service, provided historical documentation used in preparing the background discussions. Technical editing and report preparation were provided by April MacDonald and Mitch Yoshida. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .…..…………………………………………….……………1 I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………8 II. Justification for Federal Farm Credit Programs..……..…………...……...….11 III. Overview of Farm Loan Programs………...……………………..…….…….13 a.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/21/2021 and available online at DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREfederalregister.gov/d/2021-08152, and on govinfo.gov Agricultural Marketing Service [Document Number AMS-TM-21-0034] Supply Chains for the Production of Agricultural Commodities and Food Products AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice; request for public comments. SUMMARY: On February 24, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order on “America’s Supply Chains,” which directs several Federal agency actions to secure and strengthen America’s supply chains. One of these directions is for the Secretary of Agriculture (the Secretary) to submit, within one year, a report to the President that assesses the supply chains for the production of agricultural commodities and food products. This notice requests comments and information from the public to assist the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in preparing the report required by the Executive Order. Through this notice, USDA is also requesting public comment to inform our thinking regarding how stimulus relief programs and spending related to food supply chain resilience as authorized by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA), and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) can help to increase durability and resilience within the U.S. food supply. DATES: Comments must be received by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: All written comments in response to this notice should be posted online at www.regulations.gov. Comments received will be posted without change, including any personal information provided. All comments should reference the docket number AMS-TM-21-0034, the date of submission, and the page number of this issue of the Federal Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Agency (RMA) and the 2018 Farm Bill
    What’s New: Risk Management Agency (RMA) and the 2018 Farm Bill Overview • The 2018 Farm Bill makes several improvements to existing insurance products, speeds the creation of numerous new products, and strengthens the integrity of the program through new outreach and compliance requirements. Improved Prices and Actuarial Data • Actuarial operations, like determining price elections and yields, will use more internal USDA data, including data from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and Farm Service Agency (FSA). Specialty Crops • Allows for the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to offer policies for industrial hemp. • Creates Specialty Crop Liaisons in each RMA Regional Office. • Creates a dedicated Specialty Crop website. • Requires RMA to submit to the Board, for consideration, more specialty crop insurance products and expansions for existing specialty crop insurance. Conservation and Cover Cropping • Specifies cover cropping as a good farming practice if done per Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) guidelines. • Clarifies insurability of subsequent crops and the applicability of the summer fallow practice. • Segments penalties for native sod on land tilled between current and 2014 Farm Bills. • Limits penalties for newly tilled land on native sod to four cumulative years. New Policy Features • Allows for an enterprise unit to include land across county lines. • Requires underwriting rules to cap individual actual production history declines at 10 percent when due to insurable causes of loss. • Creates a Veteran Farmer or Rancher category so veteran farmers will receive additional benefits. Underserved Producers • Requires recurring study to increase participation in states and for underserved producers. • Defines Beginning Farmer as having not held an insurable interest for more than 10 years for the Whole Farm Revenue Protection Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture Big Data (Agbd) Challenges and Opportunities from Farm to Table: a Midwest
    Agriculture Big Data (AgBD) Challenges and Opportunities From Farm To Table: A Midwest Big Data Hub Community† Whitepaper Shashi Shekhar1, Patrick Schnable2, David LeBauer3, Katherine Baylis4 and Kim VanderWaal5 1 Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities 2 Dept. of Agronomy, Dept. of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University 3 Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 4 Dept. of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 5 Dept. of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Abstract: Big data is critical to help agriculture meet the challenges of growing world population, climate change and urbanization. Recent success stories include precision agriculture, phenotyping, and global agricultural monitoring. Many of these initiatives are made possible by novel data sources such as satellite imagery, instrumented tractors and initiatives such as the Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition (GODAN). This whitepaper surveys agricultural big datasets, characterizes their limitations, lists transformative opportunities and suggests a plan to engage and nurture Agriculture Big Data (AgBD) research community. Public big data includes satellite imagery (e.g., Earth on Amazon Web Services, Google Earth Engine), surveys (e.g., National Agricultural Statistics Service), financial statistics (e.g., Economic Research Service), social media (e.g., Twitter), etc. Private datasets describe yield (e.g., precision agriculture, Farm Service Agency), farm loss (e.g., Risk Management Agency) and condemnation (Food Safety and Inspection Service), etc. Limitations include data and metadata gaps, insufficient data storage, preservation, and documentation, lack of scalable spatiotemporal big data analytics methods, and inadequate secure data-sharing mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Assistance for Farm Operations and Farm Households in the Face of COVID-19
    COVID-19 Working Paper #AP-090 July 2021 COVID-19 Working Paper: Financial Assistance for Farm Operations and Farm Households in the Face of COVID-19 Anil K. Giri, Tia M. McDonald, Dipak Subedi, and Christine Whitt This paper has been published through USDA Economic Research Service’s (ERS) COVID- 19 Working Paper series. ERS’ temporary Working Paper series is designed to publicly release preliminary analyses relevant to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture, food, the environment, and rural America in a timely manner. ERS’ COVID-19 Working Papers have not undergone the review and editorial process generally accorded official ERS publications, but they have been reviewed by ERS economists and social scientists through an expedited review process. Page | 1 COVID-19 Working Paper Financial Assistance for Farm Operations and Farm Households in the Face of COVID-19, AP-090 USDA, Economic Research Service Abstract On March 13, 2020, the U.S. Federal Government declared a national emergency based on the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The Government’s response included providing assistance programs related to the economic impacts of COVID-19. This study estimates the total direct Government assistance to farm operations and farm households in calendar year 2020 from COVID-19 related programs, the Market Facilitation Program (MFP), and other existing Farm Bill (FB) programs. The insights from this study supplement the triannual U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) farm income forecasts by providing stakeholders more forecasting details, including information regarding the distribution of Federal payments and eligibility. This working paper further documents methodologies relevant for a timely update of similar payments in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Research: Background and Issues
    Agricultural Research: Background and Issues Updated October 2, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R40819 SUMMARY R40819 Agricultural Research: Background and Issues October 2, 2020 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Research, Education, and Economics (REE) mission area funds billions of dollars annually for biological, physical, and social Genevieve K. Croft science research that is related to agriculture, food, and natural resources. Four agencies Analyst in Agricultural carry out REE responsibilities: the Agricultural Research Service (ARS), the National Policy Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA), the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), and the Economic Research Service (ERS). The Under Secretary for REE, who oversees the REE agencies, holds the title of USDA Chief Scientist and is responsible for coordinating research, education, and extension activities across the entire department. The Office of the Chief Scientist (OCS)—a staff office within the Office of the Under Secretary for REE—supports this coordination role. Discretionary funding for the REE mission area totaled approximately $3.4 billion in FY2020, and mandatory funding from the 2018 farm bill adds another $177 million per year on average. USDA administers federal funding to states and local partners through its extramural research agency: NIFA. NIFA administers this extramural funding through capacity grants (allocated to the states based on formulas in statute) and competitive grants (awarded based on a peer-review process). USDA also conducts its own research at its intramural research agencies: ARS, NASS, and ERS. Debates over the direction of public agricultural research and the nature of how it is funded continue. Ongoing issues include whether federal funding is sufficient to support agricultural research, education, and extension activities; the different roles of extramural versus intramural research; and the implications of allocating extramural funds via capacity grants versus competitive grants.
    [Show full text]
  • Advancing the Aquaculture Industry Through the Federal Crop Insurance Program Matthew H
    Ocean and Coastal Law Journal Volume 24 | Number 1 Article 4 January 2019 Advancing the Aquaculture Industry Through the Federal Crop Insurance Program Matthew H. Bowen University of Maine School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj Part of the Agriculture Law Commons, Environmental Law Commons, Food and Drug Law Commons, Insurance Law Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Matthew H. Bowen, Advancing the Aquaculture Industry Through the Federal Crop Insurance Program, 24 Ocean & Coastal L.J. 59 (2019). Available at: https://digitalcommons.mainelaw.maine.edu/oclj/vol24/iss1/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ocean and Coastal Law Journal by an authorized editor of University of Maine School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ADVANCING THE AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY THROUGH THE FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE PROGRAM Matthew H. Bowen I. INTRODUCTION II. THE AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY’S CURRENT STRUGGLES III. AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE PROGRAM A. History and Policy of the Federal Crop Insurance Program B. The Mechanics of the Federal Crop Insurance Program IV. THE CURRENT AND SUGGESTED COVERAGE OF AQUACULTURE BY FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE V. SPECIFIC POLICY PROPOSALS FOR AQUACULTURE COVERAGE VI. WHY AQUACULTURE MATTERS AND WHY IT SHOULD BE SUPPORTED BY THE FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE PROGRAM VII. CONCLUSION 59 60 OCEAN AND COASTAL LAW JOURNAL [Vol. 24:1 ADVANCING THE AQUACULTURE INDUSTRY THROUGH THE FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE PROGRAM1 Matthew H.
    [Show full text]
  • Farm Service Agency: a Clear Path Forward to Providing the Highest Level of Customer Service
    A Report by a Panel of the For the U.S. Congress and the Farm Service Agency Farm Service Agency: A Clear Path Forward to Providing the Highest Level of Customer Service October 2011 August 2016 National Academy of Public Administration ® ABOUT THE ACADEMY The National Academy of Public Administration is an independent, non-profit, and non-partisan organization established in 1967 and chartered by Congress in 1984. It provides expert advice to government leaders in building more effective, efficient, accountable, and transparent organizations. To carry out this mission, the Academy draws on the knowledge and experience of its over 800 Fellows—including former cabinet officers, Members of Congress, governors, mayors, and state legislators, as well as prominent scholars, business executives, and public administrators. The Academy helps public institutions address their most critical governance and management challenges through in-depth studies and analyses, advisory services and technical assistance, Congressional testimony, forums and conferences, and online stakeholder engagement. Learn more about the Academy and its work at www.NAPAwash.org. A Report by a Panel of the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION For the Farm Service Agency August 26, 2016 Farm Service Agency: A Clear Path Forward to Providing the Highest Level of Customer Service PANEL Jonathan Breul,* Chair Merl Hackbart* Michael Lipsky* Sylvester Murray* David Smith* * Academy Fellow Officers of the Academy Paul Posner, Chair of the Board Kristine Marcy, Vice Chair Dan G. Blair, President and Chief Executive Officer B. J. Reed, Secretary F. Stevens Redburn, Treasurer Study Team Joseph P. Mitchell, III, Director of Academy Programs Joseph Tasker, Jr., Project Director Pamela Haze, Senior Advisor Jonathan Tucker, Senior Research Analyst Matt Gripp, Research Analyst Adam Darr, Research Associate Eric Christensen, Senior Research Associate Chloe Yang, Research Analyst The views expressed in this report are those of the Panel.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Nasa Satellite Data Into Usda World Agricultural Outlook Board Decision Making Environment to Improve Agricultural Estimates
    INTEGRATING NASA SATELLITE DATA INTO USDA WORLD AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK BOARD DECISION MAKING ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE AGRICULTURAL ESTIMATES 4 l William Teng l.2, Harlan Shannon3, Richard de Jeu , Steve Kempler IGoddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, NASA, Greenbelt, MD 20771, United States 2Wyle Information Systems, Inc., 1651 Old Meadow Road, McLean, VA 22102, United States 3World Agricultural Outlook Board, USDA, Washington, DC 20250, United States 4Department of Hydrology and Geo-environmental Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands Will iam.L.1'[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; Steven.] [email protected] ABSTRACT The USDA World Agricultural Outlook Board ('AI AOB) is responsible for monitoring weather and climate impacts on domestic and foreign crop development. One of WAOB 's primary goals is to determine the net cumulative effect of weather and climate anomalies on final crop yields. To this end, a broad array of information is consulted. The resulting agricultural weather assessments are published in the Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin, to keep farmers, policy makers, and commercial agricultural interests informed of weather and climate impacts on agriculture. The goal of the current project is to improve W AOB estimates by integrating NASA satellite precipitation and soil moisture observations into WAOB's decision making environment. Precipitation (Level 3 gridded) is from the TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA). Soil moisture (Level 2 swath and Level 3 gridded) is generated by the Land Parameter Retrieval Model (LPRM) and operationally produced by the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GBS DISC).
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management Agency Shutdown Contingency Plan
    Risk Management Agency RISK MANAGEMENT AGENCY (RMA) SHUTDOWN CONTINGENCY PLAN Table of Contents Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Summary of Operations during Lapse of Appropriations ............................................................................. 3 Estimate of Time Needed to Complete Shutdown Activities ....................................................................... 3 Analysis of Employees On Board and Retained ............................................................................................ 3 Activities to Be Continued ............................................................................................................................. 4 Preparation for Activities to be Continued during Shutdown ...................................................................... 4 Communications ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Shutdown Implementation Procedures ........................................................................................................ 5 Supervisors Duties in Advance of Shutdown ............................................................................................ 5 FPAC-BC HRD Duties in Advance of Shutdown ......................................................................................... 6 FPAC-BC Budget Division Duties in Advance of
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues
    Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues April 21, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46768 SUMMARY R46768 Agricultural Credit: Institutions and Issues April 21, 2021 A variety of lenders from the federal government to commercial banks make loans to farmers. The federal government provides credit assistance to farmers who cannot obtain loans elsewhere, Jim Monke and helps assure credit availability across rural areas. At Congress’s direction, federal farm loan Specialist in Agricultural programs target beginning farmers and socially disadvantaged groups based on race, ethnicity, or Policy gender. Description of Lenders The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) is a small but important lender for family-sized farms that do not qualify for credit elsewhere. FSA also guarantees payments on some loans made by other lenders. At the end of FY2019, FSA had a portfolio of $12 billion of direct loans to 87,000 borrowers and loan guarantees of $16 billion for 39,000 borrowers. Thus, out of the $423 billion market for farm debt, FSA had a direct market share of 3% of loans and loan guarantees that covered about another 5% of the market. For FY2021, annual appropriations support $9.9 billion of new FSA direct loans and guarantees. The Farm Credit System (FCS) has the next-largest amount of government intervention. FCS is a private lender with a federal charter and a statutory mandate to serve creditworthy farmers, certain agribusinesses, cooperatives, and rural homeowners in towns with less than 2,500 population. At the end of 2020, FCS had a total loan portfolio of $315 billion, including over $190 billion of farm loans (43% of farm debt).
    [Show full text]