MP3EI SEA Scoping Workshop for the Papua-Maluku Economic Corridor

Josh van Berkel Michal Musil Chris Rotinsulu

MP3EI Scoping Workshop Introduction

© DHI Roundtable Introductions • Kindly indicate: − Did you attend the MP3EI pre-scoping workshop? − Who is your agency/institution and what is your position there? − Please briefly explain the role of your agency / institution with regard to SEA and/or MP3EI planning?

• Identify key issues for whole of Indonesia and then specific Determine key issues issues for each corridor to ensure focused assessment

• Analyse spatial patterns, location of sensitive areas, trends Baseline analysis in indicators over time and development scenario without MP3EI. Stakeholder consultation

• Select key strategic issues in each corridor based on Scoping results of baseline analysis. Stakeholder consultation

Evaluate impacts of EC plans • Evaluate impacts of planned economic sectors and specific projects listed in MP3EI.

• Formulate mitigation measures to address adverse impacts Formulate mitigation measures and enhance positive impacts. Focus on KSNs and provincial development plans..

• Summarise findings and conclusions and provide overview Draft Report of consultations with stakeholders. Stakeholder consultation

Part I: Capacity Building in relation to MP3EI − Broaden SEA capacities for the execution of SEA Scoping for Plans (i.e. MP3EI EC, KSN, Provincial Plans) − Execute hands-on scoping exercise

Part II: Presentation of Internal Scoping Findings / Stakeholder Feedback − Present preliminary scoping results of strategic environmental issues related to MP3EI planning in your EC − Document, respond, and include key feedback or concerns from public and governmental EC stakeholders for consideration in subsequent stages of the SEA − Obtain additional expert input and information (where necessary) that will aid subsequent analyses of the SEA.

Morning Session Afternoon Session • Review of General and MP3EI SEA Processes • Review of the Definition of Strategic Issues • SEA Scoping Principles and Methods • Review of Baseline Information & − Purpose Autonomous Planning − Common Approaches and Limitations • Presentation of Findings − Scoping Examples • Approach to Expert Scoping − MP3EI Approach • Illustration of EC SEA Scoping • Hands-on Scoping Exercise findings • Discussions and Q-A session − Definition of Strategic Issues − Application of Scoping Matrix − Example of how to use GIS Database − Execution of hands-on scoping MP3EI Cases • Wrap-up/Closing

1. Scoping / Baseline Analysis − Determination of key issues that should be considered within the SEA 4. Taking process information − Analysis of key issues i.e. past evolution, current situation and likely future generated in SEA evolution if the plan or programme is not implemented into due account 2. Assessment of effects of the plan or programme on the key in planning and issues and development of mitigation measures (including decision-making monitoring scheme) and explaining decision in publicly 3. Compilation of the SEA Report and its submission for accountable manner consultations with environmental and health authorities and the public

Relationship between SEA & Planning

• Planning analyzes and proposes development interventions • SEA examines individual outputs of the planning process and it may propose any necessary amendments

• Optimally, SEA should be carried out in parallel with planning, when − The lead process is the planning process, and − SEA fits into the logic and steps of the planning process

• Thus, both processes can be seen as mutually reinforcing tools within one robust planning system for more sustainable development

1. MP3EI SEAs is being carried out via an ‘ex-post assessment’ method (see figure) 2. Baseline data collection focussed on: − Obtaining / integrating GOI spatial data sets − Obtaining planning / relevant baseline information from EC stakeholders

3. Scoping and Recommendations (i.e. next session) − Internal Expert Scoping

− Stakeholder Consultation / Feedback 4. Further, or verification, analysis and final recommendations

SEA Scoping Principles & Methods

• SEA Scoping is: − simply a structured method for identifying key sustainability risks or issues (i.e. areas of concern relate to Policies, Plans, Programs – i.e. PPP)

• Scoping is undertaken to quickly identify probable areas of concern and thereby establish the framework for further analyses of PPP impacts

• Scoping also prioritise ‘areas of concerns’, and communicates these to planners, decision-makers and other stakeholders, to − correct clearly unacceptable problems, note gaps and/or develop necessary mitigation actions for the PPP − Guidelines for further analyses to verify identified issues/risks as necessary for the associated level of planning and decision-making (PPP’s)

• …to use important baseline data from the PPP (area); and the combination of preliminary analysis and consultation to consider the main priorities elaborated by a PPP • …to identify key issues through appropriate levels of preliminary analyses, case examples, literature review etc. • …to keep the scope of SEA flexible – in order to allow additional or new information that could lead to:

− the discovery of new issues or risks − further define the importance or insignificance of an identified issue

Scoping Approaches / Methodologies (1)

• The are a wide selection and many variations of scoping approaches / methods • There is no one correct method • Some methods are more appropriate than others for the required level of scoping analyses

• The chosen approach should meet the needs of the entire procedure

Examples of Scoping methods include:

• Expert analysis − scoping undertaken by a individual expert based in his or her knowledge and/or experiences − Often a environmental specialist or an expert with a related academic field − Can be quick and effective, but may miss required breath of knowledge and experience and understanding of the local situation

• Delphi Sessions − Scoping executed via a group of specifically chosen experts in an organized workshop or meeting setting − Participants often include relevant environmental specialists, academic experts, engineers, planners etc. − Can be quick and effective, but can miss relevant perceptions and knowledge of the local situation

• Participatory Methods / Stakeholder Meetings (i.e. FGD) − Scoping relies partially or wholly on stakeholder input • Experts and related stakeholders execute scoping in an organized workshop • Local stakeholders approached to provide input via ‘participatory’ techniques − Participants range from experts / professionals/ academic specialist to village leaders and indigenous peoples − Can be effective through inclusion of local knowledge and experience, but may become too extensive and time consuming

• Decision Trees / Networks − Scoping executed via application of a technique that draws ‘connections’ between the initiative (policy, plans, programs or project) and different levels of environmental and social consequences − Often used by environmental specialists; can be effective, but also may be ineffective (either too simple or overly complicated) for scoping of policies, plans, or programs

• Decision Support Systems − scoping that relies on specialist software packages (i.e. databases) which generate ‘order of magnitude’ quantification of certain environmental and social consequences based on minimal input − often used by environmental experts or decision-makers when monitoring data is limited − can be very effective for estimating the scale of associated environmental concern − may require too much information to be affective for initial scoping procedures

• Many variations of analysis or ranking matrices e.g. Rapid Impact Assessment Matrix − Used typically for expert and Delphi approaches to scoping and affective for • organizing scoping analyses, and • prioritizing issues

• Maps and GIS mapping overlay • SWOT − Used typically for expert and Delphi approaches to − Most often applied for policy scoping and affective for scoping • quickly reviewing large amounts of spatial information • Previously mentioned: • Quickly identifying possible areas of concern − Decision Trees / Networks − Decision Support System

SEA Scoping Approaches: Indonesian Examples?

• The well known…Focus Group Discussions

• Please fill in other examples: − ? − ?

• Properly conducted scoping assures the efficiency of SEA, i.e. by:

− Allowing further assessment to focus only on the key sustainability issues which may be significantly affected by the plan or programme

− Providing the input for decisions on the appropriate methods and analytical tools for further analyses of the key sustainability issues of the PPP

− Ensuring that further SEA process reflects opinions of relevant stakeholders (i.e. consultations therefore should be a part of the scoping)

• Although having key importance for the efficiency of SEA process, scoping is only an initial stage of analysis and is therefore limited

• Why: − It is usually based on a limited data / general analysis − It does not need (and it is not intended), to be detailed

• Scoping… − can and should be used to provide solid interim input into policy, planning and program procedures

− results should be verified through further analysis, especially where PPP mitigation development requires more detailed input

• MP3EI EC SEA scoping aimed at identifying issues of strategic concerns related to EC planning (i.e. incl. associated policies and regulations) • Delphi (Expert) Scoping sessions using GIS/spatial data and analysis matrices • a focus on utilizing − key baseline information in each EC − Understanding autonomous development (i.e. provincial planning) − Identify potential environmental conflicts from EC planning (considering also specific projects)

• Stakeholder scoping feedback to obtain new insight/data and verify initial scoping findings • Providing interim policy and planning feedback to policy makers and planners • Providing guidelines for carrying out further analyses in the next stages of SEA

Demonstration of MP3EI GIS Database…

Demonstration of: • Key spatial baseline data… • Overlay of MP3EI Plans and Strategies… • Autonomous planning…

• Review of key baseline informations in each EC, via spatial referenced maps and pre- scoping information • MP3EI planning broken down into categories, e.g. : − MP3EI Economic Activities (e.g. Mining, Agroforestry, Heavy Industry etc.) − Connectivity/Power Generation • Scoping was further organized in relation to strategic sustainability receptor categories, namely:

1. Environmental Quality 2. Ecosystem 3. Socio-economic

• Water Quality • Forest & Others • Human Health • Air & Climate • Coastal areas • Livelihood • Land & Soil • Biodiversity • Socio-cultural

• Dedicated scoping matrices were developed relating − sustainability receptor categories (physio-chemical, ecosystem and socio-economic aspect), against − Definitions of strategic issues • A matrix was allotted to each relevant MP3EI sector / category • The nature of the concern was recorded in relation to − the definition of a strategic issue or risk (i.e. wide-scale, cumulative, interactive and climate- change related) − indicated positive (+) or negative (-) nature − additional information such as, ‘location’ or ‘rational’, and the need for further analysis

• A scoping session ‘facilitator’ led the experts (Delphi session) through the scoping session…

Agriculture/Agro-industry Strategic Risk/Opportunities Categories Further Explanation & Likely Locations of Further

Strategic Issue Verific-

Sustainability

Potential Issues of Concern ation

Receptors

required

Wide Scale Cummu lative Potential Planning Conflicts Climate Change Related Environmental Quality Yes

 Plantation developments Increased demand for irrigation compete with of agriculture activties (i.e.palm conventional crops for Water oil plantations, etc) creates (-) (-) (-) (-) water resources pressure on available water  Water balance of resources. relevant areas needs to be established to identify risk of water shortages

Mining (i.e. Nickel, gold and copper mining)

Strategic Risk/Opportunities Categories Further Explanation & Likely Locations of Further

Strategic Issue Verific-

Sustainability

Potential Issues of Concern ation

Receptors

required

Wide Scale Cummu lative Potential Planning Conflicts Climate Change Related

Ecosystems

 Sensitive location of Secondary impacts to coastal potential impact: Kao ecosystems (i.e. coral bay & Weda bay Coastal reef,.seagrass) due to the (Nickel mining in Areas related mining infrastructure (-) Halmahera), development but more project Cenderawasih bay related. (gold production in Nabire)

© DHI Definition of a ‘Strategic Issue’ for MP3EI • Strategic environmental impacts (or issues) are those that can only be adequately assessed at the planning, policy, or program stage • In relation to the ‘MP3EI Economic Planning Corridors and Economic Corridors’ a strategic sustainability issue is further defined in relation to: EC Projects / − Cumulative impacts Planning − Interactive impacts ‘Zoned’ − International / Regional Scale areas Eco- Physico- system chemical Project Project Project Socio- economic Project Existing activities

EC Baseline

#32 © DHI Scoping Examples

• Training Examples − Example #1: ‘Upstream’ Strategic Issues / Deforestation − Example #2: Cumulative Air and Water Quality Impacts

− Example #3: Coastal Degradation

• Other ‘Real’ MP3EI Examples − Example # 1: Palm Oil Agro-industry in Kalimantan / Palm Oil Agro-forestry in Papua (MIFEE) − Example # 2: Heavy Industry in Northwest Java − MP3EI & Coastal Environments / MP3EI & Forest Fragmentation

Surrounding Unprotected Surrounding Unprotected Forests Forests Conservation Areas River Agroindustry / Coal Mining Timber

Surrounding Unprotected Urban Development Forests

Road

Agriculture Protected Forests TheFuture Baseline Plans © DHI #34 Example #2: Cumulative Air and Water Quality Impacts

UrbanSmaller Expansion Urban Centre

Upstream Coal Mining

River

Upstream areas Coastal Agroindustry / Agriculture

Planned Industrial Area

TheFuture Baseline Plans © DHI #35 Example #3: Coastal Degradation

Strip Mining

Port Development (dredging, Upstream Upstream reclamation, port Agroindustry Urban development) Industrial

/ Agriculture Expansion Fishing Coral Reef Coral River

Aqua-

Upstream

Upstrea Expanded culture m Coal Industrial Mining Area International /

Domestic Shipping

Mangrove Seagrass Coastal Waters TheFuture Baseline Plans

• Clear correlation between Palm Oil Agro- industry & deforestation

• Clear risk that MP3EI will worsen deforestation

• Deforestation related damage/stress to biodiversity presents risk of ‘international scale’ impacts

• Multiple other risks, e.g. − Subsidence − GHG − Social Conflict

• Cumulative Impacts with Other sectors

• Clear correlation between Palm Oil Agro- forestry & deforestation

• Clear risk that MP3EI will worsen deforestation (MIFEE ~ 500,000Ha)

• Deforestation related damage/stress to biodiversity presents risk of ‘international scale’ impacts

• Multiple other risks, e.g. − Subsidence − GHG − Social Conflict

• Cumulative Impacts with Other sectors

• Clear existing problem with air & water quality • MP3EI KPI’s, industrial development projects, and related urbanisation will undoubtedly lead to worsening (cumulative) impacts to air & water quality • Multiple other risks − Impact to human health − Social conflict − Unabated GHG emissions

• Clear interactive impacts to coastal environments (mangrove, seagrass, and coral)

• Other coastal damage/stress related to risks, e.g.: − Biodiversity (cumulative / international scale) − Water quality − Fisheries − Social conflicts − Etc.

• Many other interactive impacts related to transport connectivity

• You will now carry out scoping of an areas identified as a ‘concern’, i.e. example of Halmahera area (mining, heavy industry, Infrastructure) and Merauke (Agroindustry, Energy, Infrastructure)

• Instructions: − Please spilt into two groups… − A scoping facilitator will be assigned to each group… − Review the baseline features of the area and any autonomous provincial planning − As per the facilitator instructions fill in the scoping matrix − As a group quickly review other MP3EI projects or policies in the ‘area of concern’ and note your conclusions − Elect a representative and provide a brief summary of your groups findings

Questions or feedbacks are welcome!

…you have reached the end of Capacity Building Workshop…

Thanks for Your Participation!

Day 2 (Morning Session) • Continued: EC SEA Scoping Findings and Discussion • Preliminary Recommendations • Plenary Session • Next Steps in MP3EI

The objectives of the EC SEA Stakeholder Scoping Workshop are:

• Present the scoping results (via GIS/spatial analysis) of EC SEA in related economic corridor

• Obtain and document stakeholders’ feedbacks or concerns for subsequent stages of SEA

• Present and discuss preliminary recommendations for EC and/or SEA

MP3EI SEA MP3EI SEA project progress True SEA integration Business as usual

Inception phase

Execution of draft Creation of policy, institutional & political

MP3EI policy SEA space to begin address key issues

processes Development of practical & operationalised MP3EI Economic Economic MP3EI

Corridor (EC) SEA SEA (EC) Corridor policy/planning responses ’ ’

Update/final MP3EI policy Verification & fine-tuning of policy and SEA

planning responses

analysis

EC SEA SEA EC Finalisation ‘ Drafting of normative requirements that can not be implemented Integrated/aligned Sustainable RPJMN Unsustainable PPP MP3EI & EC SEAs (MP3EI)) in Indonesia

In relation to the ‘MP3EI Policy Strategies and ’… A strategic sustainability issue is where a stated strategic policy or planning direction clearly deviates from established socio-economic and environmental − Legislation, regulations or polices − Goals & objectives, and/or − International commitments or treaties

IndonesianAsia Forest MillenniumPartnership Development (AFP): Goals NationalUN Convention Action onPlan Biological on Greenhouse Diversity: Gases (Target 7A): Emissions Reduction (RAN-GRK): Reducing forest loss and degradation To integrate, as far as possible and as Integratingand enhancing the principlesforest cover of tosustainable maintain appropriate,To reduce greenhouse the conservation gas emissions and by 26% on developmentthe provision ofin forestnational products policies and and sustainableIndonesian ownuse ofand biological by 41% diversityif Indonesia into receives programsecosystem as services, well as includingreversing mitigation the loss of of and adaptation to relevantinternational sectoral aid, andby the cross year-sectoral of 2020 from the condition environmentalclimate change, resources watershed and land resource protection, and plans,without programmes any action (BAU). and policies . conserving biological diversity.

In relation to the ‘MP3EI Economic Planning Corridors and Economic Corridors’… A strategic sustainability issue is further defined in relation to: − Cumulative impacts EC Projects / − Interactive impacts Planning − International / Regional Scale ‘Zoned’ areas Eco- Physico- system chemical Project Project Project Socio- economic Project Existing activities

EC Baseline

• Rich endemic biodiversity • DeforestationImportant coastal and ecosystemloss of • Abiodiversity number of conservation • Coastalareas & ecosystemprotected forests • Extensivedegradation mining & overfishing (nickel & • Mininggold) resources related • Existingenvironmental agriculture problems sector • Conflict(e.g. oil palmof interest plantation) for • Customaryeconomic development lands and indigenousbetween mining people industries • Urbanvs Fisheries related & environmentaltourism • problemsSocial conflicts concentrated over in Ambon,customary Ternate, land and Sorong , Bintuniinvestment, Timika interests, Manokwari for , Jayapuraeconomic, developmentMerauke

Brief Key MP3EI Planning • Objective: “Center for Production and Processing of National Agricultural, Fishery, Energy, Oil & Gas and Mining”

• Main planned economic developments: agriculture for food, fisheries, oil & gas, copper and nickel mining

• 10 KPI with main designation in nickel mining & fisheries and agriculture for food

Connectivity include: − Transportation Infrastructure (airports, ports, roads) − Energy infrastructure (power plants)

Presentation of Findings: Areas of Specific Concerns

BaselineIssues / Risks: related to MP3EI:

• HumanIncreased population pollution is from relatively mining concentratedand related industries in urban (waterareas of Sorongquality) , Manokwari • PrimaryThe risk forestsof habitat that degradation are relatively large with adjacent due to the road development that post logging secondary forest intersects forest • Existing mining concessions in • thePrimary region forest including degradation for Nickel due to andexpansion Oil & Gas of mining operations • DescribedPotential conflicts as having over the land highest use marinerelated biodiversityto increasing in urbanization the world • CoastalPotential habitats land use are conflicts relatively stablebetween (Coral plans Reef, and Seagrasscustomary, Mangrove)land / indigenous people • Protected forest areas and • Increased risk to public health network of marine protected areas © DHI #58

Halmahera “Hotspot”

IssuesBaseline: / Risks related to MP3EI:

•• IncreasedPopulation pollution is relatively from mining andconcentrated related industries in small (water urban qualityareas) of Ternate,Tidore •• RiskPrimary of coastal forests habitat that are relatively diminished and degradationsurrounded dueby large to the secondary coastal roadforests construction •• PrimaryMining concessionforest degradation including due to expansionNickel and of gold mining operations •• PressureOil and gas on waterconcession and waste in managementSouth East Halmahera capacity waters •• IncreasedAreas of rich risk coastalto public habitats health (Coral Reef, Seagrass, • Unwanted influences to the Mangrove) cultural autonomy

Fakfak-Bintuni-Cendrawasih Bay “Hotspot”

IssuesBaseline: / Risks Related to MP3EI :

• IncreasedHuman Population pollution isfrom relatively miningconcentrated and oil in & urbangas industries areas of (waterBintuni quality), Wasior , Biak, Supiori, • RiskNabire of coastal habitat degradation due to coastal • roadRelatively development large primary and forests possiblywith adjacent oil & gaspost operation logging • Primarysecondary forest forest degradation due • toExisting expansion mining of concessionmining for operationsoil and gas • PotentialLargest Marine urbanization National Park expandedin Indonesia to (1.5mangrove million areas ha) • RiskTNTC of mining waste water discharge into the • CendrawasihCoastal habitats bay are which relatively has highintact biodiversity (Coral Reef, sensitivity Seagrass , • IncreasedMangrove) risk to public health

Issues / Risks related to MP3EI:

Timika “Hotspot” • Potential for increased pollution from mining and related industriesBaseline: (water quality ) • The risk of habitat degradation due to roads development that intersects• primaryHuman forest Population is relatively • Primary forestconcentrated degradation duein the urban area to expansion of mining operations of Timika • Risk of mangrove• Primary forest forests that are relatively degradation duelarge to withport adjacent post logging developmentssecondary forest • Pressure on water and waste management• Existing capacity mining concessions • Increased riskincluding to public gold,health copper, oil and gas • Coastal habitats are dominated

by relatively dense mangrove forests

• Population is relatively • concentratedClear correlation in betweenthe Urban Palm MappiOil Agro and-forestry Merauke & deforestation • CenterClear risk for that production MP3EI will of worsen agriculturedeforestation and (MIFEE energy ~ (MIFEE)500,000Ha) • MiningDeforestation concession related for Oil and Gasdamage/stress to biodiversity • Primarypresents forestsrisk of ‘international that are relatively diminished and surroundedscale’ impacts by large secondary • forestsMultiple other risks, e.g. • Oil− Subsidencepalm plantation concessions− GHG • Forest− Social protected Conflict areas in • WasurCumulative, Bupul Impacts and Dolok with Other Island sectors

Environmental Quality: . Intensification of pollution (water quality) from economic activities . Land and soil degradation (agriculture and nickel/gold mining)

Ecosystem: . Further deforestation, including impact on legally protected areas . Coastal ecosystem degradation . Habitat fragmentation and loss of biodiversity (e.g. endemic species) due to infrastructure development & economic activities

Socio-Economic: . Increased pressures on water and waste management capacities . Potential conflict over customary land and indigenous communities . Public health risks related to environmental quality (air, water and food contamination) . Increased need for disaster risks management

Preliminary Key Recommendations

Key Preliminary Papua-Maluku EC Corridor recommendations include:

1. Agroindustry / Oil Palm Plantation: − Require that the palm oil productive areas be firmly established / limited in line with for the principles outlined in the ‘Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Production’

− Ensure that management of water resources in the MIFEE areas consider sufficient water supply for irrigation, and avoid water pollution due to excessive discharges of fertilizers and pesticides

1. Agroindustry / Oil Palm Plantation (Cont.): − Particular attentions in Papua-Maluku EC should be given to the following areas: • MIFEE areas in Merauke • Protected Areas (Wasur NP, CA Bupul, SM Danau Bian, SM Pulau Komolon, SM Pulau Dolok) • Watershed Areas (Kumber, Merauke, Bian, Bulaka, Kaba, Buaya) − Possible MP3EI / RPJMN Policy Suggestion: • Legislate provincial and regency law, enact and enforce principles outlined in the ‘Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Production’ • Establish additional conservation areas

2. Heavy Industry / Connectivity – Power Generation:

− Possible MP3EI / RPJMN Policy Suggestion: Introduce water quality standards, make application of BAT a requirement in all new EIA (permitting procedures), and permit renewals

3. Mining: − Develop strict mine selection criteria for the EC/Provinces and require that all future mining applications (via EIA procedures ) to comply. These criteria should: • Ensure that protected areas (Marine & Terrestrial) are not impacted (directly and indirectly) • Prevent mining operation adjacent to tourism potential areas − For Papua-Maluku EC, these criteria should particularly exclude mining in the following sensitive areas: • Birdshead Seascape Papua (Incl. Kaimana, Raja Ampat, Cendrawasih Bay) • Raja Ampat (Tourism)

3. Mining (Cont.): − Possible MP3EI / RPJMN Policy Suggestion: Introduce strict mining regulations for the design facilities related to, or management of: • Hazardous material and tailings ponds • Site water management • Site closure • Also, firmly establish legal liability in relation to site emission, contamination or accidents

4. Connectivity: − Develop new planning rules for the routing of roads or location of ports and/or required mitigation measures (establishing ecological corridors, compensation actions) − Extend water and wastewater management initiatives for all growing urban centers − In relation to the above, particular attentions in Papua-Maluku EC should be given to the following areas: • (Connectivity-Water issues) Merauke Regency, Central East Coast of Halmahera, Sorong Regency • (Connectivity-Forest&others) Asmat/Agat port, Mappi Regency/Bade port, Road Timika- Nabire cut-off protected forest • coastal area impacted from port development in Halmahera Timur regency, Sorong regency, Asmat, Mappi, Mimika and Teluk Bintuni regency

4. Connectivity (Cont.): − Possible MP3EI / RPJMN Policy Suggestion: set strict goals, investment levels, and operationalized steps to meet national goals for clean drinking water, sustainable modes of transportation, and wastewater/waste management.

5. Coastal Activities (connectivity {e.g. ports, power }, agriculture, fisheries, industry, mining, tourism): − Require, in areas of intense coastal development, require the application of ‘Integrated Coastal Zone Management’ to first avoid cumulative impacts from MP3EI initiatives and later to ensure long term management. In this regard, particular attention in Papua-Maluku EC should be given to the following areas: • Birds Head Papua Coastal Areas (Sorong Regency, Cendrawasih Bay, Sarmi, Fakfak, Bintuni, Asmat Regency, Mappi, Mimika, Teluk Bintuni) • North Maluku Coastal Areas (Kao Bay, Weda Bay, East Halmahera Regency, ) • SE Maluku Coastal Areas (Tual, SE Maluku Regency, IMIZ) − Possible MP3EI / RPJMN Policy Suggestion: fully legislate (provincial and regency law), enact and enforce ICZM for all relevant coastal activities

6. Societal Issues: − Ensure that EC developments respect the livelihoods and territorial rights of indigenous people to avoid social conflict: In this regard, particular attention in Papua-Maluku EC should be given to the following areas: • Customary lands adjacent to projects areas: Merauke (MIFEE), • Indonesia Maritime Industrial Area in SE Maluku Regency (Tual,) − Possible MP3EI / RPJMN Policy Suggestion: fully legislate provincial and regency law, enact and enforce ICZM for all relevant coastal activities. − Develop a general policy that prioritizes employment of local people over migrant workers to maintain as far as possible existing societal norms.

• Instructions − Please spilt into 2 groups − Please, as a group, review the findings via the presentation material and if needed, the GIS database − In your analysis please determine or develop • If there is additional information (e.g. baseline or provincial planning) from your area that is relevant to the further analyse • Substantiated feedback on the validity or inaccuracy of the presented Papua- Maluku EC Team findings • Alternative mitigation recommendations − Elect a representative and provide a brief summary of your groups findings

• Identify key issues for whole of Indonesia and then specific Determine key issues issues for each corridor to ensure focused assessment

• Analyse spatial patterns, location of sensitive areas, trends in Baseline analysis indicators over time and development scenario without MP3EI. Stakeholder consultation

• Select key strategic issues in each corridor based on results of Scoping baseline analysis. Stakeholder consultation

Evaluate impacts of EC plans • Evaluate impacts of planned economic sectors and specific projects listed in MP3EI

Formulate mitigation • Formulate mitigation measures to address adverse impacts and enhance positive impacts. Focus on KSNs and provincial measures development plans

• Summarise findings and conclusions and provide overview of Draft Report consultations with stakeholders. Stakeholder consultation

Michal Musil [email protected]