2020-21 Men's Basketball

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020-21 Men's Basketball ® 2020-21 MEN’S BASKETBALL GATA22 NCAA Tournament Selections: 1939, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1970, 1971, 1975, 1979, 1980, 1983, 1988, 1998, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2019, 2020 2020-21 SCHEDULE GAME 25 - AT FRESNO STATE (11-10, 9-10 MW) ALL: 17-7 | H: 10-2 | A: 6-3 | N: 1-2 | MW: 14-4 MARCH 6 | FRESNO, CALIF. (SAVE MART CENTER) | AGGIE SPORTS NETWORK | FOX SPORTS 1 Rank: AP Top 25/USA Today Coaches’ Poll USU ANTICIPATED STARTERS SERIES AT A GLANCE NOVEMBER (1-2) ALPHONSO ANDERSON USU LEADS 40-25 25 -/- -/- vs VCU^ L, 69-85 6-6 • 220 • FORWARD • SENIOR H: 25-8; A: 12-16; N: 3-1 26 -/- -/- vs South Dakota State^ L, 59-83 10 TACOMA, WASH. | NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE ® 6.7 ppg | 2.6 rpg | 0.7 apg | 0.4 spg 75.1 << POINTS 66.3 27 -/- -/- vs Northern Iowa^ W, 82-71 FG% .429 (54-of-126) | 3PT% .367 (18-of-49) | FT% .794 (27-of-34) 63.4 << POINTS ALLOWED 67.2 DECEMBER (5-1) BROCK MILLER 6-5 • 200 • GUARD • JUNIOR +11.7 << SCORING MARGIN -0.9 5 -/- -/- BYU L, 64-67 SANDY, UTAH | BRIGHTON HS 22 << FIELD GOAL % 8 -/- -/- COLLEGE OF IDAHO W, 90-64 9.1 ppg | 1.8 rpg | 1.0 apg | 0.5 spg .454 .426 12 -/- -/- at Weber State Canceled FG% .406 (73-of-180) | 3PT% .392 (49-of-125) | FT% .700 (14-of-20) .398 << DEFENSIVE FG% .432 15 -/- -/- DIXIE STATE Canceled NEEMIAS QUETA .340 << 3-POINT FG% .322 18 -/- -/- NORTHERN COLORADO W, 63-50 7-0 • 245 • CENTER • JUNIOR << BARREIRO, PORTUGAL • BENFICA SL B .345 DEF. 3-PT FG% .342 21 -/- -/- SAN JOSÉ STATE* W, 107-62 23 << 14.8 ppg | 9.7 rpg | 2.9 bpg | 2.9 apg | 1.2 spg FREE THROW % 23 -/- -/- SAN JOSÉ STATE* W, 85-52 FG% .565 (134-of-237) | 3PT% .000 (0-of-2) | FT% .664 (73-of-110) .723 .664 31 -/- -/- at Air Force* W, 83-48 12.6 << OFF. REBOUNDS 11.2 JUSTIN BEAN 6-7 • 210 • FORWARD • JUNIOR 40.6 << REBOUNDS 35.8 JANUARY (7-2) 34 MOORE, OKLA. | SOUTHMOORE HS 10.8 ppg | 7.5 rpg | 2.1 apg | 1.3 spg | 0.3 bpg 16.6 << ASSISTS 10.3 2 -/- -/- at Air Force* W, 72-53 << FG% .508 (98-of-193) | 3PT% .243 (9-of-37) | FT% .860 (43-of-50) 6 -/- -/- at New Mexico* (Lubbock, Texas) W, 77-45 13.8 TURNOVERS 14.0 8 -/- -/- at New Mexico* (Lubbock, Texas) W, 82-46 MARCO ANTHONY 7.1 << STEALS 6.7 14 -/- RV/RV SAN DIEGO STATE* W, 57-45 6-5 • 225 • GUARD • RS-JUNIOR 44 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS | VIRGINIA 4.6 << BLOCKS 2.8 16 -/- RV/RV SAN DIEGO STATE* W, 64-59 10.7 ppg | 4.7 rpg | 2.9 apg | 1.0 spg | 0.4 bpg 19 RV/- -/- COLORADO STATE* W, 83-64 FG% .417 (85-of-204) | 3PT% .354 (17-of-48) | FT% .628 (49-of-78) 15.5 << FOULS 17.4 21 RV/- -/- COLORADO STATE* L, 76-84 25 -/- -/- at UNLV* L, 56-59 OPENING TIPS 27 -/- -/- at UNLV* W, 83-74 • Utah State is 41-13 in Mountain West play under head coach Craig Smith and is 5-1 against Fresno State during his tenure. Overall, Utah State leads the all-time series 40-25 against the Bulldogs and has won eight of the nine, including each of the last FEBRUARY (3-2) four games in Fresno. All-time, USU is 12-16 on the road in the series. 4 -/- -/- at Fresno State* W, 69-53 6 -/- -/- at Fresno State* PPD • Junior center Neemias Queta is one of just six players since the 1992-93 season to average more than 14.5 points, 9.5 re- 10 -/RV -/- WYOMING* PPD bounds, 2.5 assists and 2.5 blocks per game, joining the likes of Tim Duncan (‘95-96, ‘96-97), Chris Webber (‘92-93) and Bo 12 -/RV -/- WYOMING* Canceled Outlaw (‘92-93). The last player to have that stat line was Jason Thompson from Rider during the 2007-08 season. 17 RV/RV -/RV at Boise State* L, 70-79 19 RV/RV -/RV at Boise State* L, 77-81 • Queta is the only player in the nation with 65 or more assists and 65 or more blocks. Queta leads the Mountain West in field 26 -/- -/- NEVADA* W, 75-72 goal percentage (.571), 2-point field goals (141), defensive rebounds (168), total rebounds (237), blocks (71), blocks per game 28 -/- -/- NEVADA* W, 87-66 (3.0), player efficiency rating (31.4), defensive rebound percentage (27.8), total rebound percentage (19.6), block percent- age (12.8), defensive rating (80.8), defensive win shares (2.3), win shares per 40 minutes (.275), defensive box plus/minus (6.5) MARCH (1-0) and box plus/minus (12.2). 4 -/- -/- WYOMING* W, 72-59 6 -/- -/- at Fresno State* 9 p.m. • Queta is one of 10 semifinalists, one of just three outside the Power 5, for the Naismith Defensive Player of the Year Award 10 -/- -/- MW TOURNAMENT FIRST ROUND TBA and leads the nation in defensive win shares (2.3). Queta is second in the nation in defensive box plus/minus (6.5) and third 11 -/- -/- MW TOURNAMENT QF TBA in overall defensive rating (80.8). Queta’s 71 total blocks this season ranks fourth in the nation, while his average of 2.96 per 12 -/- -/- MW TOURNAMENT SF TBA game ranks fifth. 13 -/- -/- MW TOURNAMENT CHAMPIONSHIP TBA • Over the course of his career, Queta has a school-record 193 total blocks, including 133 rejections in league play, second * - Denotes Mountain West game all-time in Mountain West history. Queta is five blocks shy of the all-time MW record held by San Diego State’s Skylar Spencer ^ - Bad Boy Mowers Crossover Classic (Sioux Falls, S.D.) of 138 set during league games from 2012-16. HOME GAMES IN CAPS All times Mountain • Queta and junior forward Justin Bean have each logged a double-double in each of the last five and three games, respec- tively. During that stretch, Queta is averaging 23.6 points, 12.8 rebounds, 2.6 assists, 2.6 blocks and 1.2 steals per game. Over the last two games, Bean is averaging 19.0 points, 11.0 rebounds and 2.7 steals per game. • Junior guard Brock Miller missed the Aggies’ last contest against Wyoming, snapping a streak of 92 consecutive games played. • Redshirt junior guard Marco Anthony has locked up two of the best guards in the league over the two games, holding Ne- vada’s Grant Sherfield to 8.5 points per game and 28.5 percent shooting from the floor (6-of-21). Anthony followed up that Utah State Athletic Media Relations performance by guarding Wyoming’s Marcus Williams and holding him to four points on just 25.0 percent (2-of-8) shooting 7400 Old Main Hill • Logan, Utah 84322-7400 from the floor. Kyle Cottam, Assistant AD for Media Relations • Utah State has had 10 different players lead the team in steals during a game this season. (435) 817-7702 • [email protected] UTAH STATE MEN’S BASKETBALL UTAH STATE GLASS EATERS 20-POINT CLUB 2020-21 MW STANDINGS Utah State has outrebounded every opponent this Utah State has only had four players eclipse 20 MW Overall season and is 69-15 under Smith when winning the points this season as Justin Bean has recorded a pair San Diego State 14-3 0.824 20-4 0.833 W11 battle of the boards. The Aggies lead the nation of 20-point games while Marco Anthony scored 22 Colorado State 14-3 0.824 17-4 0.810 W5 with a rebounding margin of 10.8. points against UNI (11/27) and Brock Miller had 20 Utah State 14-4 0.778 17-7 0.708 W3 points against Colorado State (1/19). Neemias Que- Boise State 14-6 0.700 18-7 0.720 L3 Nevada 9-7 0.563 14-9 0.609 L2 OPPORTUNISTIC AGGIES ta leads the Aggies with three 20-point games this Fresno State 9-10 0.474 11-10 0.524 W1 • Utah State has pulled down double-digit offen- season with each coming over the course of four of UNLV 8-9 0.471 11-13 0.458 L1 sive rebounds in all but four games this season and the last five games. Wyoming 6-9 0.400 12-10 0.545 L1 leads the MW with 12.9 offensive rebounds per San José State 3-13 0.188 5-15 0.250 L4 game in league play. The Aggies have scored 290 SUCCEEDING IN THE CLASSROOM Air Force 3-17 0.150 5-19 0.208 L2 second-chance points this season, making up more • Utah State led the nation with seven student-ath- New Mexico 2-15 0.118 6-15 0.286 L2 than 15 percent of their total points. letes named to the NABC Honor Roll during the 2019-20 season. This Week in the MW • Utah State has close to a 2-to-1 advantage in sec- Friday, March 5 ond-chance points as the Aggies have totaled 290 • Returners Marco Anthony, Alphonso Anderson, Colorado State at Nevada to their opponent’s 160. Brock Miller and Justin Bean were each part of the Saturday, March 6 group with a 3.2 or higher cumulative GPA. Utah State at Fresno State ASK SHERWIN-WILLIAMS UNLV at Wyoming Utah State has scored 810 points in the paint this ACTIVE DOUBLE-DOUBLE LEADERS season, outscoring all but four opponents from in- USU junior Neemias Queta is the current active lead- side.
Recommended publications
  • Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer
    applied sciences Article Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, 6410 Molde, Norway; [email protected] Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 20 October 2020 Abstract: Rating systems play an important part in professional sports, for example, as a source of entertainment for fans, by influencing decisions regarding tournament seedings, by acting as qualification criteria, or as decision support for bookmakers and gamblers. Creating good ratings at a team level is challenging, but even more so is the task of creating ratings for individual players of a team. This paper considers a plus–minus rating for individual players in soccer, where a mathematical model is used to distribute credit for the performance of a team as a whole onto the individual players appearing for the team. The main aim of the work is to examine whether the individual ratings obtained can be split into offensive and defensive contributions, thereby addressing the lack of defensive metrics for soccer players. As a result, insights are gained into how elements such as the effect of player age, the effect of player dismissals, and the home field advantage can be broken down into offensive and defensive consequences. Keywords: association football; linear regression; regularization; ranking 1. Introduction Soccer has become a large global business, and significant amounts of capital are at stake when the competitions at the highest level are played. While soccer is a team sport, the attention of media and fans is often directed towards individual players. An understanding of the game therefore also involves an ability to dissect the contributions of individual players to the team as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Game No. 4 GARDNER-WEBB(0-3, 0-0 Big South) at WICHITA
    WICHITA STATE BASKETBALL Bryan Holmgren, Director of Communications | e: [email protected] | w: 316-978-5535 | c: 316-841-6206 Game No. 4 GARDNER-WEBB (0-3, 0-0 Big South) at WICHITA STATE (3-0, 0-0 American) SHOCKERS BULLDOGS Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2019 • 7:05 p.m. CT • Wichita, Kan. • Charles Koch Arena (10,506) D-I Rank* Total* Team Stats Total* D-I Rank* TV: YurView Kansas (Cox HD 2022 in Kansas; streaming in all 50 states at YurView.com/Kansas); Shane Dennis (pbp) & Bob Hull (analyst) call the action. T-78 80.0 Offense 61.0 T-318 Radio: KEYN (103.7 FM in Wichita; streaming at goshockers.com/Listen); Mike Kennedy (pbp) & Dave Dahl (analyst) have the call. 53 59.7 Defense 72.7 T-245 Tickets: goshockers.com/Tickets // Live Stats: shockerstats.com // Social: Follow @GoShockersMBB & @GoShockers on facebook, twitter, instagram. 41 20.3 Scoring Margin -11.7 306 43 9.7 Rebound Margin -6.0 T-300 T-52 16.7 Assists 11.3 T-274 Record 0-3 3-0 Record T-48 5.3 Blocks 4.3 T-98 Big South 0-0 0-0 American 78 8.7 Steals 6.7 T-194 Home 0-1, Lost 1 3-0, Won 5 Home 9 9.3 Turnover Margin -1.7 251 Away 0-2, Lost 2 vs 0-0, Won 6 Away 2 2.08 A:TO Ratio 0.67 T-297 Neutral 0-0 0-0 Neutral 292 39.4 FG % 39.2 299 Streak Lost 3 Won 3 Streak 111 38.7 FG% Defense 43.4 229 AP/ Coaches -/- - / - AP/Coaches T-44 9.7 3-Point FG 5.7 T-282 ESPN BPI* 169 83 ESPN BPI* 58 38.7 3-Point % 29.3 263 KenPom* 218 62 KenPom* 91 73.4 FT% 69.6 T-167 The Series: WSU leads 1-0 // Last Meeting: Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Computer Science in Sport a Comprehensive
    International Journal of Computer Science in Sport Volume 18, Issue 1, 2019 Journal homepage: http://iacss.org/index.php?id=30 DOI: 10.2478/ijcss-2019-0001 A comprehensive review of plus-minus ratings for evaluating individual players in team sports Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Molde, Norway Abstract The increasing availability of data from sports events has led to many new directions of research, and sports analytics can play a role in making better decisions both within a club and at the level of an individual player. The ability to objectively evaluate individual players in team sports is one aspect that may enable better decision making, but such evaluations are not straightforward to obtain. One class of ratings for individual players in team sports, known as plus-minus ratings, attempt to distribute credit for the performance of a team onto the players of that team. Such ratings have a long history, going back at least to the 1950s, but in recent years research on advanced versions of plus-minus ratings has increased noticeably. This paper presents a comprehensive review of contributions to plus- minus ratings in later years, pointing out some key developments and showing the richness of the mathematical models developed. One conclusion is that the literature on plus-minus ratings is quite fragmented, but that awareness of past contributions to the field should allow researchers to focus on some of the many open research questions related to the evaluation of individual players in team sports. KEYWORDS: RATING SYSTEM, RANKING, REGRESSION, REGULARIZATION IJCSS – Volume 18/2019/Issue 1 www.iacss.org Introduction Rating systems, both official and unofficial ones, exist for many different sports.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-01-31Smu
    This Game Next Game: Head Coach ..........................................Tim Jankovich NABC Coaches vs Cancer SMU Mustangs Overall ...........................................256-173 (14th Year) #SuitsAndSneakers at TULSA Golden Hurricane At SMU.................................................99-52 (5th Year) Wednesday, Feb. 3 - 8pm CT Location (Enrollment) ..................Dallas, Texas (12,385) SMU Mustangs Tulsa, Oklahoma (9-3, 5-3 American) Reynolds Center Conference..........................................American Athletic at TV: ESPNU Colors............................................................Red & Blue [6/6] HOUSTON SMU Radio: KAAM 770 AM Arena ...........................Moody Coliseum (7,000 / 1,800) (14-1, 9-1 American) TuneIn App - SMU, SMU App Court ..............................................David B. Miller Court (Rich Phillips, Scott Garner) President ........................................Dr. R. Gerald Turner Sunday, January 31 - 12pm CT #PonyUp Director of Athletics ..........................................Rick Hart Basketball SID.............Herman Hudson / [email protected] SMU Basketball Houston, Texas - Fertitta Center Following Game Office/Cell Phone ............214-768-1304 / 214-924-0358 70 All-League 1st Team Honors SMU Mustangs at ECU Pirates ................................Lindsey Olsen / [email protected] 24 Selections In The NBA Draft TV: ESPN (Kevin Brown, Jon Crispin) Monday, Feb. 8 - 5pm ET/4pm CT Web Site ..........................................SMUMustangs.com 16 Conference Titles Greenville,
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Wolf Pack 2020-21 Men’S Basketball Game Notes 9 Ncaa Tournament Appearances 22 Conference Championships 16 Nba Draft Picks | 6 All-Americans
    NEVADA WOLF PACK 2020-21 MEN’S BASKETBALL GAME NOTES 9 NCAA TOURNAMENT APPEARANCES 22 CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIPS 16 NBA DRAFT PICKS | 6 ALL-AMERICANS SCHEDULE (12-7, 7-5 MW) GAME 20 Friday, Feb. 5 - 6:00 p.m. • Lawlor Events Center • Reno, Nev. NOVEMBER NEVADA WOLF PACK VS BOISE STATE BRONCOS Wed. 25 vs. NDSU # W, 62-48 12-7 | 7-5 Mountain West 14-2 | 10-1 Mountain West Thu. 26 at Nebraska # (BTN) W, 69-66 Mon. 30 Pacific W, 70-58 Nevada (12-7, 7-5 MW), fresh off of a series ALL-TIME SERIES sweep of UNLV, has a quick turnaround as it Series ..............................................Nevada leads 48-28 DECEMBER hosts first-place Boise State in a two-game Current Streak ............................................................... L1 Last Meeting................................................Feb. 1, 2020 Wed. 2 San Francisco L, 60-85 set at Lawlor Events Center. ..............................................Boise State 73, Nevada 64 Mon. 7 William Jessup W, 86-64 .........................................................................Boise, Idaho Fri. 11 at Grand Canyon L, 77-87 The series opens Friday at 6 p.m., with the Mon. 14 at San Diego W, 79-72 finale set for Sunday at 1 p.m. Both contests STAT COMPARISON BOISE ST NEV Fri. 18 * Air Force W, 74-57 will air on FS1, with Tim Neverett and Doug Points per game 79.9 73.0 Sun. 20 * Air Force L, 66-68 Gottlieb on the call. The series will also be Points per game allowed 63.1 67.1 Thu. 31 * at New Mexico % (FS1) W, 68-54 broadcast in Reno on ESPN Radio 94.5 FM Scoring margin +16.8 +5.9 with John Ramey and Len Stevens calling FG percentage 47.2 44.3 JANUARY the action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect Alternate Player Efficiency Rating Has on NBA Franchises Regarding Winning and Individual Value to an Organization
    St. John Fisher College Fisher Digital Publications Sport Management Undergraduate Sport Management Department Spring 2012 The Effect Alternate Player Efficiency Rating Has on NBA Franchises Regarding Winning and Individual Value to an Organization Anthony Van Curen St. John Fisher College Follow this and additional works at: https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/sport_undergrad Part of the Sports Management Commons How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited ou?y Recommended Citation Van Curen, Anthony, "The Effect Alternate Player Efficiency Rating Has on NBAr F anchises Regarding Winning and Individual Value to an Organization" (2012). Sport Management Undergraduate. Paper 35. Please note that the Recommended Citation provides general citation information and may not be appropriate for your discipline. To receive help in creating a citation based on your discipline, please visit http://libguides.sjfc.edu/citations. This document is posted at https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/sport_undergrad/35 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Effect Alternate Player Efficiency Rating Has on NBAr F anchises Regarding Winning and Individual Value to an Organization Abstract For NBA organizations, it can be argued that success is measured in terms of wins and championships. There are major emphases placed on the demand for “superstar” players and the ability to score. Both of which are assumed to be a player’s value to their respective organization. However, this study will attempt to show that scoring alone cannot measure success. The research uses statistics from the 2008-2011 seasons that can be used to measure success through aspects such as efficiency, productivity, value and wins a player contributes to their organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Player Benchmarking and Outcomes: a Behavioral Science Approach
    Player Benchmarking and Outcomes: A Behavioral Science Approach Ambra Mazzelli (Asia School of Business & MIT) Robert Nason (Concordia University) Track: Basketball Paper ID: 1548699 1. Introduction Benchmarking is important to monitor and provide feedback to players on their performance. (i.e. are they under or overperforming). Behavioral science research, especially that grounded in social psychology, indicates that performance feedback has a strong impact on human behavior including: individual motivation (Deci, 1972; DeNisi, Randolph, & Blencoe, 1982; Pavett, 1983), risk-taking (Kacperczyk et al., 2015; Krueger Jr & Dickson, 1994; March & Shapira, 1992), and performance (Sehunk, 1984; Smither, London, & Reilly, 2005). As a result, performance feedback that is provided to players has the potential to induce changes in player performance. For example, Hall of Famers Shaquille O'Neal and Charles Barkley recently gave voice to negative performance feedback regarding Philadelphia 76ers Center Joel Embiid by openly criticizing him on TNT’s Inside the NBA. Early in the 2019 season, Joel Embiid’s player efficiency rating (PER) currently ranks an impressive 11th in the league (24.73), but is under his own past performance (2018/2019 PER = 26.21)1. Shaq and Charles suggested that Embiid’s recent relative underperformance was due to a lack of motivation and made a point of comparing Embiid to centers on other teams with higher PERs, such as Giannis Antetokounmpo and Anthony Davis. In the next game following Shaq and Charles comments (December 12, 2019 vs. the Boston Celtics) Embiid posted his best game of the season with a season high 38 points and a plus minus of +21 (in a game that the Sixers only won by 6 points).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association
    Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Steven Milano, M.S. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Packianathan Chelladurai, Advisor Brian Turner Sarah Fields Stephen Cosslett Copyright by Michael Steven Milano 2011 Abstract Building on the research of Loeffelholz, Bednar and Bauer (2009), the current study analyzed the relationship between previously compiled team performance measures and the outcome of an “un-played” game. While past studies have relied solely on statistics traditionally found in a box score, this study included scheduling fatigue and team depth. Multiple models were constructed in which the performance statistics of the competing teams were operationalized in different ways. Absolute models consisted of performance measures as unmodified traditional box score statistics. Relative models defined performance measures as a series of ratios, which compared a team‟s statistics to its opponents‟ statistics. Possession models included possessions as an indicator of pace, and offensive rating and defensive rating as composite measures of efficiency. Play models were composed of offensive plays and defensive plays as measures of pace, and offensive points-per-play and defensive points-per-play as indicators of efficiency. Under each of the above general models, additional models were created to include streak variables, which averaged performance measures only over the previous five games, as well as logarithmic variables. Game outcomes were operationalized and analyzed in two distinct manners - score differential and game winner.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Shot Locations and Shot Types Used in NCAA Men's Division I Basketball"
    Northern Michigan University NMU Commons All NMU Master's Theses Student Works 8-2019 SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL Olivia D. Perrin Northern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/theses Part of the Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, Sports Sciences Commons, and the Statistical Models Commons Recommended Citation Perrin, Olivia D., "SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL" (2019). All NMU Master's Theses. 594. https://commons.nmu.edu/theses/594 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All NMU Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL By Olivia D. Perrin THESIS Submitted to Northern Michigan University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Office of Graduate Education and Research August 2019 SIGNATURE APPROVAL FORM SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL This thesis by Olivia D. Perrin is recommended for approval by the student’s Thesis Committee and Associate Dean and Director of the School of Health & Human Performance and by the Dean of Graduate Education and Research. __________________________________________________________ Committee Chair: Randall L. Jensen Date __________________________________________________________ First Reader: Mitchell L. Stephenson Date __________________________________________________________ Second Reader: Randy R.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Weir (York, ‘04) Analyst
    the university of new mexico 15 NCAA Tournament Appearances WAC Champions: 1964, 1968, 1974, 1978, 1993, 1994, 1996 2020-21 MEN’S BASKETBALL Six Mountain West Tournament Championships: 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2014 2020-21 SCHEDULE Game 10: New Mexico at Dixie State DATE OPPONENT TV TIME (MT) Dec. 13 at Rice CUSATV W, 72-61 NEW MEXICO Media Information Dec. 15 vs. OLLU YouTube W, 104,65 Lobos Location:.........................................Burns Arena Dec. 17 vs. LeTourneau YouTube W, 90-58 .................................................St. George, Utah Capacity: .................................................. 4,779 Dec. 21 at Boise State* FS1 L, 53-77 Radio: ................................................96.3 KKOB Dec. 23 at Boise State* CBSSN L, 52-89 Record ...................................................... 3-6, 0-6 MW ...........................................Lobo Radio Network Dec. 31 Nevada* FS1 L, 54-68 Conference .......................................... Mountain West Play-By-Play ...............................Robert Portnoy Jan. 2 Nevada* CBSSN L, 74-84 Head Coach ..................................Paul Weir (York, ‘04) Analyst ....................................... Hunter Greene Live Stats: .....dixiestateathletics.com/sidearmstats/ Jan. 6 Utah State* CBSSN L, 45-77 Record at UNM ..........................55-53 (Fourth Season) Career Record ............................... 83-59 (Fifth Season) mbball Jan. 8 Utah State* FS1 L, 46-82 Wednesday, Jan. 13 Jan. 13 at Dixie State WDN 7 p.m. Tipoff: ................................................7 p.m. MT Jan. 16 at UNLV* CBSSN 3:30 p.m. DIXIE STATE TV: ....................................WAC Digital Network Jan. 18 at UNLV* FS1 7:30 p.m. Trailblazers Notes last updated: January 11, 2020 Jan. 21 San José State* MWN 1 p.m. Jan. 23 San José State* MWN 1 p.m. Jan. 28 at Fresno State* CBSSN 9 p.m. Record .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Forecasting Most Valuable Players of the National Basketball Association
    FORECASTING MOST VALUABLE PLAYERS OF THE NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION by Jordan Malik McCorey A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of North Carolina at Charlotte in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering Management Charlotte 2021 Approved by: _______________________________ Dr. Tao Hong _______________________________ Dr. Linquan Bai _______________________________ Dr. Pu Wang ii ©2021 Jordan Malik McCorey ALL RIGHTS RESERVED iii ABSTRACT JORDAN MALIK MCCOREY. Forecasting Most Valuable Players of the National Basketball Association. (Under the direction of DR. TAO HONG) This thesis aims at developing models that would accurately forecast the Most Valuable Player (MVP) of the National Basketball Association (NBA). R programming language was used in this study to implement different techniques, such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), K- Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Linear Regression Models (LRM). NBA statistics were extracted from all of the past MVP recipients and the top five runner-up MVP candidates from the last ten seasons (2009-2019). The objective is to forecast the Point Total Ratio (PTR) for MVP during the regular season. Seven different underlying models were created and applied to the three techniques in order to produce potential outputs for the 2018-19 season. The best models were then selected and optimized to form the MVP forecasting algorithm, which was validated by predicting the MVP of the 2019-20 season. Ultimately, two underlying models were most robust under the LRM framework, which is considered the champion approach. As a result, two combination models were constructed based on the champion approach and proved to be most efficient.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Summer Program for Undergraduate Research (SPUR) Wharton Undergraduate Research 8-24-2017 Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance Jimmy Gao University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/spur Part of the Applied Statistics Commons, Business Analytics Commons, Sports Management Commons, Sports Studies Commons, and the Statistical Models Commons Recommended Citation Gao, J. (2017). "Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance," Summer Program for Undergraduate Research (SPUR). Available at https://repository.upenn.edu/spur/23 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/spur/23 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exploring the Impacts of Salary Allocation on Team Performance Abstract Study of salary has been an increasingly important area in professional sports literature. In particular, salary allocation can be a significant factor of team performance in NBA, given credit to the wisdom of team managers. This paper seeks to extend the scope of existing research on basketball by investigating on how salary allocation affected team performance and exploring other factors that lead to team success. Our findings indicate a moderate correlation between salary allocation and team performance, while average Player Efficiency Rating is a more crucial factor of team performance in comparison. Keywords Basketball, Salary Allocation, Player Efficiency Rating (PER), Superstar Effect, Golden State Warriors Disciplines Applied Statistics | Business Analytics | Sports Management | Sports Studies | Statistical Models This working paper is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/spur/23 Exploring the Impact of Salary Allocation on NBA Team Performance Acknowledgement I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]