DOCSLIB.ORG

The Mahatma and the High Court Judge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

THE JOURNAL OF THE NSW BAR ASSOCIATION | SUMMER 2009 / 2010 Online Precedents and Publications. Online Precedents and Publications. Online PrecedentsOnline Precedents and Publications. and Publications. The Mahatma and the High Court judge The missing constitutional cog: the omission of the Inter-State Commission Shadow Attorney General Smith on sentencing final.indd 1 13/05/2009 4:22:59 PM final.indd 1 13/05/2009 4:22:59 PM final.indd 1 final.indd 1 13/05/2009 4:22:5913/05/2009 PM 4:22:59 PM | CoNTeNTS | 2 Editor’s note 4 President’s column 6 Letters to the editor 8 Opinion The shadow attorney on sentencing A geriatric barrister’s yearning 24 Recent developments Judicial bias in America Aon and amendments Pape’s Case 43 Personalia 95 Music Costs in the Federal Court Bret Walker SC Supreme Court Concert Military justice in the dock 44 Readers 2009 96 Obituaries The Human Rights Consultation 45 Features The Hon Theodore Simos QC David Lukins 36 Tutors and Readers Dinner AB Piddington KC The missing constitutional cog 99 Bullfry 37 Practice Dealing with complex and 102 Book reviews Briefing junior counsel specialised factual material 111 Bar sports Surfing lawyers 85 Legal History Bar football: NSW v Victoria 39 Cuisine Australia’s first litigants Wentworth Wombats on tour Bench and Bar lunches 88 Appointments NSW Bar v Qld Bar Cricket 40 Muse The Hon Justice M J Slattery Sherlock Holmes in Australian The Hon Justice M Schmidt judgments The Hon Justice D Davies The Hon Justice S Austin District Court appointments barTHe JoURNAL oF THe NSWnews BAR ASSoCIATIoN | SUMMeR 2009–2010 Bar News Editorial Committee ISSN 0817-0002 (c) 2009 New South Wales Bar Association Andrew Bell SC (editor) Views expressed by contributors to This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted Keith Chapple SC under the Copyright Act 1968, and subsequent Bar News are not necessarily those of amendments, no part may be reproduced, stored Mark Speakman SC the New South Wales Bar Association. in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means Arthur Moses SC or process without the specific written permission Jeremy Stoljar SC Contributions are welcome and from the copyright owner. Requests and inquiries Chris o’Donnell should be addressed to the editor, concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the editor, Bar News, c/- The New South Carol Webster Andrew Bell SC Wales Bar Association, Basement, Selborne Chambers, Richard Beasley eleventh Floor 174 Phillip Street Sydney, NSW 2000. David Ash Wentworth Selborne Chambers Julie Soars 180 Phillip Street, Kylie Day Sydney 2000. Andrew Scotting Jenny Chambers DX 377 Sydney Chris Winslow (Bar Association) Cover: Indian leader Mahatma (Mohandas) Gandhi, circa 1948. Photo: Bar News | Summer 2009–2010 | 1 Topical Press Agency / Getty Images. AB Piddington KC. Photo: State Library of NSW | eDIToR’S NoTe | conventions may also operate to restrict and I thank the respective authors – the infl ow and turnover of ‘fresh blood’ typically younger members of the Bar – for and ideas on bar councils. their contributions. Youth is balanced by the sage refl ections of Ian Barker QC It goes without saying that none of these in his opinion piece, styled ‘A geriatric thoughts represents a criticism, express or barrister’s yearning for the good old days’. implied, of any current or past senior offi ce (Barker was never a member of the late holders of the Bar Association; on the Paul Lynham’s band ‘Pace-maker and the contrary, I hold them in the highest esteem Gerries’.) and admire enormously their dedicated contribution and public service. That This issue also continues our commitment having been said, however, the growth in to the exploration of matters of historical both the size of the association and the legal interest with what are, in one breadth of the tasks and corresponding sense, companion pieces. David Ash time involved which members of the has prepared the third of his features on Bar governance executive of the council appear to have to members of the NSW Bar to have been As this issue is put to press, a new Bar devote to the association at the very least appointed to the High Court, this time Council has been elected. There is an calls for some refl ection and questioning of focussing on AB Piddington, the judge unwritten convention that, although the convention that the three most senior who famously never took up his seat but members of the council are elected on an offi ces of the association are held for two who is, nonetheless, a fi gure of signifi cant annual basis, members of the executive of year periods rather than one year, which historical interest. It is a superb and the council, or at least the president and is the term of offi ce of the president of fascinating piece of work. (For Ash’s earlier vice-presidents, hold offi ce for two years the Law Society of New South Wales, for portraits of Barton and o’Connor, see Bar assuming their re-election to the council, example. News Summer 2007–2008 and Summer which is invariably the case. So long as the individuals concerned The long ‘lead time’ in relation to senior positions may are willing to do so, that may well be a good thing in terms of continuity operate to deter highly capable members of the Bar of leadership although if there is a Association who may otherwise have a great deal to ‘progression’ from junior vice-president to senior vice-president to president, contribute and otherwise be disposed to offer themselves as also seems to be a convention, this for service from seeking election. argument may be doubted. on the other hand, one’s impression is that the burdens and workload of these three most This issue 2008–2009 respectively). Piddington senior positions within our governance I am pleased to be able to thank followed his resignation from the High structure are incredibly onerous and call the shadow state attorney general Court by accepting an appointment as for a massive contribution of time from and member of the Bar Association, the inaugural president of the Inter-State (and income foregone by) the individuals Greg Smith SC, for his excellent and Commission, a body few will have heard concerned. Whilst the high degree of politically courageous but eminently of but whose existence is mandated by public service which such offi ce-holding sensible contribution to the issue of section 101 Commonwealth Constitution. entails is laudable, it may be more – and sentencing and so-called ‘law and order I have taken the opportunity to reprise even far more – than it is reasonable to auctions’. The Bar News policy has been research I undertook into this body while expect. The long ‘lead time’ in relation to invite contributions from both sides an economic history student (some time to senior positions may operate to deter of politics and previous issues have ago) which is reproduced in this issue, highly capable members of the Bar seen the publication of contributions in edited form, under the heading ‘The Association who may otherwise have a from the current state attorney and his Missing Constitutional Cog – the omission great deal to contribute and otherwise be predecessor, as well as contributions from of the Inter-State Commission’. The third disposed to offer themselves for service Commonwealth attorneys from both the substantive article is Justice Allsop’s recent from seeking election. The current Coalition and Labor sides of politics. paper entitled ‘Judicial Disposition of Cases’, which considers and questions This issue includes many useful notes on the manner in which technical expert recent cases and current developments 2 | Bar News | Summer 2009–2010 | | eDIToR’S NoTe | evidence is received and assessed. In this his own forensic techniques to identify Acknowledgements context, the juxtaposition of this article Australia’s first civil litigants. Members I thank Anna Katzmann SC for her support with the piece concerning the Inter- can also catch up with a host of judicial of Bar News through the two years of her State Commission is deliberate, as the appointments and also read of the honour presidency. I also thank this year’s Bar latter body was intended to have been conferred on Bret Walker SC through the News committee which has shared the an economic High Court expert in the award of the Law Council’s Presidential heavy load of producing what I hope has determination of, inter alia, issues of inter- Medal. Quite apart from being the most become a very high quality publication state protectionism. outstanding appellate lawyer in the with a mix of the current, the interesting, country, dominating the High Court Bar The Hon Leslie Katz SC continues to the practical, the historical, the personal across both civil and criminal matters, muse on literary allusions in Australian and the social life of the vital institution he has made unstinting and herculean judgments, in this case tracking Sherlock that is the New South Wales Bar. contributions to the governance of the Holmes’s appearances in Australian law profession both at a state and national Andrew Bell SC reports. Ian Temby QC draws on level. His award is richly deserved. Editor Bar News | Summer 2009–2010 | 3 | PReSIDeNT’S CoLUMN | proposed national legal profession reforms to provide these services. have the potential to signifi cantly affect Further, although it is apparent that it is the structure of the bar and the way we desirable to have national standards of practise. An example of this is the proposal practice, there does not seem to be any to appoint a national legal ombudsman reason that the bar does not continue to who would have effective oversight be responsible for the regulatory functions, over disciplinary matters concerning all which it currently performs.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Negative Implications in the Interpretation of Commonwealth Legislative Powers

    The Role of Negative Implications in the Interpretation of Commonwealth Legislative Powers

    THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE IMPLICATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF COMMONWEALTH LEGISLATIVE POWERS MICHAEL STOKES* One of the bases for the view that Commonwealth powers should be interpreted broadly is the idea that it is wrong to draw negative implications from positive grants of power. The paper argues that far from being wrong to draw negative implications from positive grants of power it is necessary to do so in that it is impossible to interpret such grants sensibly without drawing negative implications from them. This paper considers Isaacs J’s argument in Huddart Parker that it is wrong to draw negative implications from positive grants of power, as it is the most detailed defence of that position, and the adoption of similar arguments in Work Choices. It then considers the merits of Isaacs J’s argument, rejecting it because it is impossible to interpret positive grants of power without drawing negative implications from them in any context and in the Australian constitutional context in particular. This paper looks at how the scope of such implications is to be determined and how constitutional grants of power ought to be interpreted in the light of negative implications. It concludes that it is possible to determine the scope of the negative implications implicit in the s 51 grants of power and to interpret those powers in the light of the implications while accepting that state powers are residual and that their content cannot be determined until the content of all Commonwealth powers is known. CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 176 II The Origin of the Argument That It Is Wrong to Draw Negative Implications from Positive Grants of Power .......................................................
  • Inaugural Speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith

    Inaugural Speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith

    Inaugural speeches in the NSW Parliament Briefing Paper No 4/2013 by Gareth Griffith ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author would like to thank officers from both Houses for their comments on a draft of this paper, in particular Stephanie Hesford and Jonathan Elliott from the Legislative Assembly and Stephen Frappell and Samuel Griffith from the Legislative Council. Thanks, too, to Lenny Roth and Greig Tillotson for their comments and advice. Any errors are the author’s responsibility. ISSN 1325-5142 ISBN 978 0 7313 1900 8 May 2013 © 2013 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior consent from the Manager, NSW Parliamentary Research Service, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. Inaugural speeches in the NSW Parliament by Gareth Griffith NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Gareth Griffith (BSc (Econ) (Hons), LLB (Hons), PhD), Manager, Politics & Government/Law .......................................... (02) 9230 2356 Lenny Roth (BCom, LLB), Acting Senior Research Officer, Law ............................................ (02) 9230 3085 Lynsey Blayden (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Law ................................................................. (02) 9230 3085 Talina Drabsch (BA, LLB (Hons)), Research Officer, Social Issues/Law ........................................... (02) 9230 2484 Jack Finegan (BA (Hons), MSc), Research Officer, Environment/Planning..................................... (02) 9230 2906 Daniel Montoya (BEnvSc (Hons), PhD), Research Officer, Environment/Planning ..................................... (02) 9230 2003 John Wilkinson (MA, PhD), Research Officer, Economics ...................................................... (02) 9230 2006 Should Members or their staff require further information about this publication please contact the author.
  • Justice Richard O'connor and Federation Richard Edward O

    Justice Richard O'connor and Federation Richard Edward O

    1 By Patrick O’Sullivan Justice Richard O’Connor and Federation Richard Edward O’Connor was born 4 August 1854 in Glebe, New South Wales, to Richard O’Connor and Mary-Anne O’Connor, née Harnett (Rutledge 1988). The third son in the family (Rutledge 1988) to a highly accomplished father, Australian-born in a young country of – particularly Irish – immigrants, a country struggling to forge itself an identity, he felt driven to achieve. Contemporaries noted his personable nature and disarming geniality (Rutledge 1988) like his lifelong friend Edmund Barton and, again like Barton, O’Connor was to go on to be a key player in the Federation of the Australian colonies, particularly the drafting of the Constitution and the establishment of the High Court of Australia. Richard O’Connor Snr, his father, was a devout Roman Catholic who contributed greatly to the growth of Church and public facilities in Australia, principally in the Sydney area (Jeckeln 1974). Educated, cultured, and trained in multiple instruments (Jeckeln 1974), O’Connor placed great emphasis on learning in a young man’s life and this is reflected in the years his son spent attaining a rounded and varied education; under Catholic instruction at St Mary’s College, Lyndhurst for six years, before completing his higher education at the non- denominational Sydney Grammar School in 1867 where young Richard O’Connor met and befriended Edmund Barton (Rutledge 1988). He went on to study at the University of Sydney, attaining a Bachelor of Arts in 1871 and Master of Arts in 1873, residing at St John’s College (of which his father was a founding fellow) during this period.
  • Edmund Barton and the 1897 Federal Convention

    Edmund Barton and the 1897 Federal Convention

    The Art of Consensus: Edmund Barton and the 1897 Federal Convention The Art of Consensus: Edmund Barton and the 1897 Federal Convention* Geoffrey Bolton dmund Barton first entered my life at the Port Hotel, Derby on the evening of Saturday, E13 September 1952. As a very young postgraduate I was spending three months in the Kimberley district of Western Australia researching the history of the pastoral industry. Being at a loose end that evening I went to the bar to see if I could find some old-timer with an interesting store of yarns. I soon found my old-timer. He was a leathery, weather-beaten station cook, seventy-three years of age; Russel Ward would have been proud of him. I sipped my beer, and he drained his creme-de-menthe from five-ounce glasses, and presently he said: ‘Do you know what was the greatest moment of my life?’ ‘No’, I said, ‘but I’d like to hear’; I expected to hear some epic of droving, or possibly an anecdote of Gallipoli or the Somme. But he answered: ‘When I was eighteen years old I was kitchen-boy at Petty’s Hotel in Sydney when the federal convention was on. And every evening Edmund Barton would bring some of the delegates around to have dinner and talk about things. I seen them all: Deakin, Reid, Forrest, I seen them all. But the prince of them all was Edmund Barton.’ It struck me then as remarkable that such an archetypal bushie, should be so admiring of an essentially urban, middle-class lawyer such as Barton.
  • Personal Injury Law 2011

    Personal Injury Law 2011

    Event pricing (please tick your selection) EXAMPLE One day conference 1 $ 900 + GST = $ 990 $990 Personal Injury Law 2011 Essential strategies and case law updates for assessing and managing injury claims 16 November 2011, The Grace Hotel Sydney 23 November 2011, Stamford Plaza Melbourne Speakers Sydney: • The Honourable Justice Margaret Beazley AO, New Program highlights South Wales Court of Appeal • Richard Seton SC, Barrister, Maurice Byers Chambers • Interpretation of Section 5D of the Civil Liability Act in Personal Injury Cases • Kellie Edwards, Barrister, Denman Chambers • Raj Kanhai, Long Tail Claims Manager, QBE Insurance • Psychological injuries in workers compensation claims • Colin Purdy, Barrister, Edmund Barton Chambers • Managing claims and approaching dispute resolution in • Gaius Whiffin, Partner, Turner Freeman the current environment: an insurer’s perspective • Liability of principal contractors Melbourne: • His Honour Judge Philip Misso, County Court of • Personal Injury and the regulator Victoria • Assessing damages for catastrophic injury: key • Dorothy Frost, Director-Return to Work Division, considerations and recent trends WorkSafe Victoria • Disease provisions in workers’ claims • Raj Kanhai, Long Tail Claims Manager, QBE Insurance • Identifying the evidence needed to successfully bring • Anne Sheehan, Barrister, Douglas Menzies Chambers medical negligence claims • Jacinta Forbes, Barrister, Owen Dixon Chambers East • Sasha Manova, Barrister, Isaacs Chambers Claim 6 CPD/MCLE points Product of: Early bird discount
  • The French Economic Mission to Australia 1918

    The French Economic Mission to Australia 1918

    JACQUELINE DWYER 30 AHEAD OF THEIR TIME: THE FRENCH ECONOMIC MISSION TO AUSTRALIA 1918 JACQUELINE DWYER Introduction In the closing weeks of the Great War, Sydney was taken over by the enthusiastic welcome given to the delegates of an Economic Mission to Australia, sent on behalf of the government of France. They had that morning disembarked from the steamship Sonoma after their journey across the Pacific Ocean from San Francisco.1 The Mission’s principal aim was to re-establish and enhance the trading conditions that had existed between France and Australia in the years preceding the war, taking advantage of Germany’s eclipse. The French Department of Foreign Affairs hoped also to discuss the destiny of former German colonies in the South Pacific, and to resolve the pending situation of the New Hebrides.2 These delegates were to spend three months in Australia, visiting the other state capitals and regional centres where similar welcomes awaited them, and where they were shown the potential trading resources of this nation. This article proposes, through a more detailed description and analysis of the Mission than has been done to date, to cast light on French-Australian relations of the time, combining a number of sources. The Mission’s official report for the general public, The Economic Relations between France and Australia, published in English in 1919, is a detailed assessment of their bilateral trade.3 Especially valuable was Robert Aldrich’s article (1989), ‘La Mission Française en Australie de 1918’, based on the diplomatic archives of the Quai d’Orsay. (Its title has been shortened to Confidential Report.) A third report is the Rapport Thomsen.
  • Constitutional Law Note

    Constitutional Law Note

    CONSTITUTIONAL LAW NOTE Topic 1, 2 – The Structure of Parliament and Legislative Procedures o The Structure .......................................................................................................... 3 o Duration and Membership ..................................................................................... 5 o Standard Legislative Procedures: Commonwealth and States ............................... 8 o Commonwealth Alternative Procedures (section 57) ............................................ 10 o Commonwealth Restrictive Procedures (section 128) .......................................... 13 o Special Procedures for Financial Legislation (section 53, 54, 55) ........................ 15 o State Restrictive Procedures .................................................................................. 19 Topic 3 – Characterisation and Interpretation o Principles of Constitutional Interpretation ............................................................. 25 o The Process of Characterisation ............................................................................. 28 Topic 4 – Financial and Economic Powers o Taxation Power – section 51(ii) ............................................................................. 33 o Grants Power – section 96 ..................................................................................... 36 o Appropriation Power – section 81 ......................................................................... 38 o Corporations Power – section 51(xx) ...................................................................
  • Dictation Test

    Dictation Test

    Macquarie Law Journal (2005) Vol 5 241 DICTATING TO ONE OF ‘US’: THE MIGRATION OF MRS FREER KEL ROBERTSON WITH JESSIE HOHMANN AND IAIN STEWART∗ I INTRODUCTION The ‘White Australia Policy’ and the dictation test under which it was infamously enforced provided central policy tools in the quest to control Australia’s immigrant population from Federation in 1901 until well into the twentieth century. Based on similar legislation that had been enacted in Natal, and that had also been cloned in some of the Australian colonies, the test was widely recognised as ‘merely a convenient and polite device … for the purpose of enabling the Executive Government of Australia to prevent the immigration of persons deemed unsuitable because of their Asiatic or non-European race’.1 ∗ Respectively: former LLB student, Macquarie University (this article originated in 2001 as a research paper by Robertson, supervised by Stewart); PhD student, University of Cambridge; Senior Lecturer, Department of Law, Division of Law, Macquarie University. Robertson is the principal author. His was the idea of examining the Freer Case, his is the overall argument and he did almost all of the archival research (and before the National Archives began to digitise). This article was commissioned by the Editor. In the references, frequently cited newspapers are abbreviated as CT (Canberra Times), DT (Daily Telegraph, Sydney) and SMH (Sydney Morning Herald). Newspaper page numbers cited are those of the edition seen. Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates are abbreviated as CPD. ‘NAA’ refers to files in the National Archives of Australia: most of the files referred to are available online at <http://naa12.naa.gov.au> at 22 August 2006; also available through the more wide-ranging website ‘Archives of Australia’, <http://www.archivenet.gov.au/home.html> at same.
  • The Doctrine of Implied Intergovernmental Immunities: a Recrudescence? Thomas Dixon*

    The Doctrine of Implied Intergovernmental Immunities: a Recrudescence? Thomas Dixon*

    The Doctrine of Implied Intergovernmental Immunities: A Recrudescence? Thomas Dixon* The essential and distinctive feature of “a truly federal government” is the preservation of the separate existence and corporate life of each of the component States concurrently with that of the national government. Accepting that a number of polities are contemplated as coexisting within a federation does not, however, address the fundamental question of how legislative and executive powers are to be allocated among the constituent constitutional units inter se, nor the extent to which the various polities are immune from interference occasioned by their constitutional counterparts. These “federal” questions are fundamental as they ultimately define the prism through which one views the Constitution. Shifts in the lens have resulted in significant ramifications for intergovernmental relations. This article traces the development of the Melbourne Corporation doctrine in Australia, and undertakes a comparative analysis with the development of the cognate jurisprudence in the United States. Analysis is undertaken of the major Australian industrial relations decisions, such as the Amalgamated Society of Engineers v Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd, Re Australian Education Union; Ex parte Victoria, Queensland Electricity Commission v Commonwealth, and United Firefighters Union of Australia v Country Fire Authority, in this context. But one of the first and most leading principles on which the commonwealth and the laws are consecrated, is left the temporary possessors
  • The New South Wales Legal Profession in 1917

    The New South Wales Legal Profession in 1917

    Battles Overseas and At Home: The New South Wales Legal Profession in 1917. The Symposium 24 March 2012 Tony Cunneen [email protected] Comments welcome Synopsis: This paper focuses on the events of 1917 and is a part of a series on Lawyers in the First World War. Other papers in the series cover lawyers on Gallipoli and in 1916 as well as related topics may be accessed on the website of the Francis Forbes Society for Australian Legal History on http://www.forbessociety.org.au/ or by contacting the author directly at the above email address. Introduction: The activities of lawyers in the first decades of the twentieth century in general and the First World War in particular have received scant attention. The need to examine this area lies in lawyers’ importance in defining the early forms of Australian life after Federation and their leadership of many war related activities. The period of 1914-1918 was a time when the country was determining just how it would operate as an independent Federation yet also a full member of the British Empire – which was increasingly being seen as an international community of nations. An investigation of lawyers’ activities during the war challenges any stereotypes of a remote, isolated profession 2 and reveals a vibrant, human community steeped in shared values of service and cooperation and determined to play an active part in shaping the nation. war service, whether on the battlefield or the Home Front was seen as an essential part of that process. The development of the protectorate of Papua was part of that process.
  • PART THREE Chapter Five Hope

    PART THREE Chapter Five Hope

    PART THREE Chapter Five Hope For many former members of the Australian Imperial Force (AIF) after World War I, life on the land on a small poultry or vegetable block in company with other returned men represented more than just a return to civilian life. It was hope – hope that the horrors of war could be erased, hope that the emerging new world would be more prosperous, and hope that their lives would be re-built through their own enterprise of land ownership. For a considerable number of men on these group settlements it was also their last hope. Expectations of success were, therefore, high in the beginning on these settlements. The previous chapters of this thesis have outlined the settlements’ origins and establishment and some of the issues facing settlers, such as poor quality land, stock or crops. These difficulties made earning a living from small acreages more arduous than the men had been led to believe and they often soon found themselves with little income and a massive debt. In addition to the problems of flooding and inferior land, badly constructed homes, poor communication systems, and isolation for themselves and their families, most of the men had war-related disabilities to contend with. In spite of all these challenges, these soldier settlers attempted to re-adapt to civilian life and to build a sustainable community as part of a group soldier settlement. To support the argument of this thesis that most soldier settlers on the six group settlements in this study returned from World War I service physically and mentally 180 scarred, leaving them with long-term or permanent disabilities, a number of primary sources have been used to build a picture of how they struggled to make a living after the war.
  • The Idea of a Federal Commonwealth

    The Idea of a Federal Commonwealth

    Chapter One Th e Idea of a Federal Commonwealth* Dr Nicholas Aroney Arguably the single most important provision in the entire body of Australian constitutional law is s. 3 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). Th is section authorised Queen Victoria to declare by proclamation that the people of the several Australian colonies should be united in a Federal Commonwealth under the name of the Commonwealth of Australia. Several things are at once noticeable about this provision. Of primary importance for present purposes is that, while the formation of the Commonwealth depended upon an enactment by the Imperial Parliament at Westminster and a proclamation by the Queen, the Australian Commonwealth was itself premised upon the agreement of the people of the several colonies of Australia to be united into a federal commonwealth. Th e framers of the Constitution could arguably have used any one of a number of terms to describe the nature of the political entity that they wished to see established. Th e federation was established subject to the Crown and under a Constitution, so they might have called it the Dominion of Australia and describeddescribed it as a constitutional monarchy. Th e Constitution was arguably the most democratic and liberal that the world had yet seen, so perhaps they could have called it the United States of Australia and describeddescribed it as a liberal democracy. But to conjecture in this way is to hazard anachronism. Th e framers of the Constitution chose to name it the Commonwealth of Australia and toto describedescribe it as a federal commonwealth.