2013 Newsletter Final Copy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historic Districts CHAPTER 5: HISTORIC DISTRICTS
Historic Districts CHAPTER 5: HISTORIC DISTRICTS The information presented in this chapter is adapted from the book Places from the Past: The Tradition in Gardez Bien in IN THIS CHAPTER: Montgomery County, Maryland by Clare Lise Cavicchi. • Introduction. 91 • Beallsville (17/1) . 92 INTRODUCTION • Boyds (18/8) . 93 Historic districts possess a significant concentration, • Brookeville (23/65) . 94 linkage, or continuity of sites, buildings, structures, or • Capitol View Park (31/7)* . 95 objects united historically or aesthetically by plan or • Cedar Grove (14/27) . 96 physical development. Montgomery County has a diverse • Chevy Chase Village (35/13)* . 97 • Clarksburg (13/10)*. .100 collection of historic districts. They encompass small rural • Forest Glen (31/8) . .101 towns (Beallsville and Hyattstown), railroad communities • Garrett Park (30/13) . .102 (Boyds), and streetcar suburbs (Chevy Chase Village), • Germantown (19/13) . .103 each of which has varying settings and distinct resources. • Glen Echo Park (35/26) . .104 This chapter provides historical information about each • Hawkins Lane (35/54)*. .105 district and gives an overview of the unique nature of • Hyattstown (10/59)* . .106 the historic resources. • Kensington (31/6)* . .107 • Linden (36/2) . .108 • National Park Seminary (36/1) . .109 • Polychrome (32/5) . .110 • Sandy Spring (28/11) . .111 • Somerset (36/35) . .112 • Takoma Park (37/3)* . .113 *Historic districts marked with an asterisk (*) have district-specific design guidelines. The guidance in this document may supplement those guidelines adopted specifically for a historic district. In any cases where the district-specific guidelines and the Design Guidelines for Historic Sites and Districts in Montgomery County, Maryland are in conflict, the district-specific guidelines prevail. -
Space and Place in Four African American Slave Narratives
HOUSES OF BONDAGE, LOOPHOLES OF RETREAT DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2000) McMaster University (English) Hamilton, Ontario TITLE: Houses ofBondage, Loopholes ofRetreat: Space and Place in Four African American Slave Narratives. AUTHOR: Nanette June Morton, B.A. (York University) M.A. (McMaster University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. D. Goellnicht NUMBER OF PAGES: vi, 294 n HOUSES OF BONDAGE. LOOPHOLES OF RETREAT: SPACE AND PLACE IN FOUR AFRICAN AMERICAN SLAVE NARRATIVES By NANETTE JUNE MORTON. B.A.. M.A. A Thesis Submitted to the School ofGraduate Studies in Partial Fulfilment ofthe Requirements for the Degree Doctor ofPhilosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Nanette June Morton, July 2000 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the relationship between space and the recognition ofAfrican American subjectivity in four African American slave narratives: Frederick Douglass's Narrative ofthe Life ofFrederick Douglass (1845) and My Bondage and My Freedom (1855); Harriet Jacobs's Incidents in the Life ofa Slave Girl (1861); and Elizabeth Keckley's Behind the Scenes, or, Thirty Years a Slave and Four Years in the White House (1868). Influenced by geographer Edward Soja's examination ofsocial space, I argue that the socio-economic relationship between slaveowners and slaves produced slave space. The area where slaves lived and worked, it was concrete evidence ofthe slave's inferior, non-subject status. Slaves, however, asserted their subjectivity by appropriating, shaping, and escaping the spaces to which they were confined. The slaves' shaping ofspace included the construction ofa "homeplace," a domestic space where slaves could recognize each others' subjectivity. InNarrative oftbe Life ofFrederick Douglass, Douglass documented his escape from Southern slave space to Northern free space, where he hoped to be defined as a subject rather than an object. -
South Village Historic District Designation Report December 17, 2013
South Village Historic District Designation Report December 17, 2013 Cover Photographs: 200 and 202 Bleecker Street (c. 1825-26); streetscape along LaGuardia Place with 510 LaGuardia Place in the foreground (1871-72, Henry Fernbach); 149 Bleecker Street (c. 1831); Mills House No. 1, 156 Bleecker Street (1896-97, Ernest Flagg); 508 LaGuardia Place (1891, Brunner & Tryon); 177 to 171 Bleecker Street (1887-88, Alexander I. Finkle); 500 LaGuardia Place (1870, Samuel Lynch). Christopher D. Brazee, December 2013 South Village Historic District Designation Report Essay prepared by Christopher D. Brazee, Cynthia Danza, Gale Harris, Virginia Kurshan. Jennifer L. Most, Theresa C. Noonan, Matthew A. Postal, Donald G. Presa, and Jay Shockley Architects’ and Builders’ Appendix prepared by Marianne S. Percival Building Profiles prepared by Christopher D. Brazee, Jennifer L. Most, and Marianne S. Percival, with additional research by Jay Shockley Mary Beth Betts, Director of Research Photographs by Christopher D. Brazee Map by Jennifer L. Most Commissioners Robert B. Tierney, Chair Frederick Bland Christopher Moore Diana Chapin Margery Perlmutter Michael Devonshire Elizabeth Ryan Joan Gerner Roberta Washington Michael Goldblum Kate Daly, Executive Director Mark Silberman, Counsel Sarah Carroll, Director of Preservation TABLE OF CONTENTS SOUTH VILLAGE HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP .............................................. FACING PAGE 1 TESTIMONY AT THE PUBLIC HEARING ................................................................................ 1 SOUTH -
MCPB Agenda Item6 October 12, 2017 MEMORANDUM Date: October 10, 2017 TO: Montgomery County Planning Board VIA: Michael F
MCPB Agenda Item6 October 12, 2017 MEMORANDUM Date: October 10, 2017 TO: Montgomery County Planning Board VIA: Michael F. Riley, Director, Department of Parks Mitra Pedoeem, Deputy Director, Department of Parks Michael Ma, Chief, Park Development Division (PDD) FROM: Carl Morgan, CIP Manager, PDD SUBJECT: FY19-24 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Adoption Session Staff Recommendation Approve the proposed FY19-24 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). CIP Status This is the final Planning Board session for the FY19-24 CIP. Accompanying this memo is a complete set of draft Project Description Forms (PDFs) for approval. The recommended FY19-24 CIP will be forwarded to the County Executive and County Council by November 1, as required by State Law. Follow-up from Prior Work Sessions At the close of Work Session #2 on September 18, the Board completed reviewing the entire CIP, project by project. Staff indicated that we would return on October 12 to • Report on the County Council’s action regarding the request to increase Spending Affordability Guidelines (SAG) for Park and Planning Bonds from the Existing $6.5m per year to $8.0m per year • Present any further technical adjustments, corrections or fine tuning, and • Present a summary of the CIP 9500 Brunett Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20901 www.MontgomeryParks.org General Information: 301.495.2595 Spending Affordability Guidelines As staff discussed with the Board in prior work sessions, SAG limits the programming of Park and Planning Bonds, sold by the Commission, that fund local parks and County GO bonds that fund non-local parks. After holding a public hearing on September 19, 2017 and discussing SAG at the Council’s Government Operations and Fiscal Policy (GO) Committee on September 28, 2017, the Council took action on SAG on October 3, 2017.