DOCSLIB.ORG

Nature Reserves of the Shire of Toody a Y

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nature Reserves of the Shire of Toody a Y Western Australian Nature Reserve Management Plan No. 6 NATURE RESERVES OF THE SHIRE OF TOODY A Y by SUSAN A. MOORE ANDREW A. E. WILLIAMS IAN G. CROOK and GRAEME R. CHATFIELD Western Australian Wildlife Research Centre, P.O. Box 51, Wanneroo 6065 Western Australia This Plan was adopted by the Western Australian Wildlife Authority on 10 December 1984 and approved by the Honourable H. D. Evans M.L.C., Minister for Fisheries and Wildlife, on 3 January 1985. This Plan was approved by the Bush Fires Board in terms of the provisions of Subsection ( 1) of Section 34 of the Bush Fires Act 19&4-1979 on 18 January 1984. DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE PERTH 6000 1985 39377-1 NOTE Since revision of the Draft Plan, and shortly prior to its adoption by the Western Australian Wildlife Authority, two of the nature reserves covered by this Plan­ Beelaring (No. 529) and Goonaring (No. 659)-have been cancelled and combined with Lot 194 to create "Morangup" Nature Reserve (No. "A" 38924). This new reserve, with an area of 930.7 ha, was declared on 23 November 1984 for the Conservation of Flora and Fauna, with vesting in the Wildlife Authority. The incorporation of these two small reserves into the larger "Morangup" Nature Reserve will necessitate the production of a separate management plan for this new reserve. In the interim, some modification of the management prescriptions given for Goonaring and Beelaring may be necessary, in view of their incorporation into a single large reserve. It should be noted that where this Plan refers to Beelaring (No. 529) or Goonaring (No. 659) Nature Reserve, it should be read as referring to those portions of "Morangup" Nature Reserve (No. "A" 38924). CONTENTS Page PART 1. INTRODUCTION....................................................... 13 A. GENERAL INTRODUCTION.................................. 13 1. Nature Reserve Status............................................. 13 2. Access Classification . ...... .. .. .. .. .. ... 13 B. THE SHIRE OF TOODYA Y...................................... 14 1. Climate.................................................................... 15 2. Geomorphology........................................................ 15 3. Soils.......................................................................... 15 4. Vegetation................................................................ 18 5. Fauna....................................................................... 18 6. Land Use.................................................................. 20 7. The Reserves............................................................ 20 PART 2. BEELARING NATURE RESERVE (No. 529) and GOONARING NATURE RESERVE (No. 659) ········································································ 25 A. THE RESERVES......................................................... 25 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships ............ 25 2. History..................................................................... 25 3. Soils and Vegetation . .. .. .. .. 2 7 4. Fauna....................................................................... 31 5. Past Management, Use and Fire History................ 31 6. Nature Conservation Values ................................... 31 B. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT................................... 33 1. Management Objectives.......................................... 33 2. Fire Protection......................................................... 3 3 3. Protection from Pests: Animal and Weed Control............................... 34 4. Rehabilitation and Maintenance of the Natural Environment..................................................... 34 5. Public Use................................................................ 35 6. Management-General........................................... 35 PART 3. RUGGED HILLS NATURE RESERVE (RESERVE No. 21429)........................................ 37 A. THE RESERVE........................................................... 37 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships ............ 37 2. History . .. .. .. .. 3 7 3. Soils and Vegetation . .. 3 7 4. Fauna....................................................................... 39 5. Past Management, Use and Fire History................ 40 6. Nature Conservation Values ................................... 40 B. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT................................... 40 1. Management Objectives.......................................... 40 2. Fire Protection......................................................... 41 39377-2 5 Page 3. Protection from Pests: Animal and Weed Control............................... 41 4. Public Use................................................................ 42 5. Management-General........................................... 42 PART4. POISON GULLY NATURE RESERVE (RESERVE No. 19900)........................................ 43 A. THE RESERVE........................................................... 43 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships ............ 43 2. History..................................................................... 43 3. Soils and Vegetation................................................ 43 4. Fauna....................................................................... 45 5. Past Management Use and Fire History................. 45 6. Nature Conservation Values . ............ ..... .......... ..... .. 46 B. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT................................... 46 1. Management Objectives.......................................... 46 2. Fire Protection......................................................... 47 3. Protection from Pests: Animal and Weed Control............................... 4 7 4. Public Use................................................................ 47 5. Research.................................................................. 48 6. Management-General........................................... 48 PART 5. FLAT ROCK GULLY NATURE RESERVE (RESERVE No. 22096)........................................ 49 A. THE RESERVE . .. 49 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships .......... .. 49 2. History..................................................................... 49 3. Soils and Vegetation................................................ 49 4. Fauna....................................................................... 52 5. Past Management, Use and Fire History................ 52 6. Nature Conservation Values................................... 52 B. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT................................... 53 1. Management Objectives.......................................... 53 2. Fire Protection . .. 53 3. Protection from Pests: Animal and Weed Control............................... 54 4. Public Use and Research......................................... 54 5. Management-General........................................... 54 PART 6. BEWMALLING NATURE RESERVE (RESERVE No. 30306)........................................ 55 A. THE RESERVE........................................................... 55 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships............ 55 2. History..................................................................... 55 3. Soils and Vegetation . .. .. 55 6 Page 4. Fauna....................................................................... 57 5. Past Management, Use and Fire History................ 57 6. Nature Conservation Values................................... 58 B. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT................................... 59 1. Management Objectives.......................................... 59 2. Fire Protection......................................................... 59 3. Protection from Pests: Animal and Weed Control............................... 60 4. Public Use................................................................ 60 5. Research.................................................................. 60 6. Management~General........................................... 61 PART 7. WATTENING NATURE RESERVE (RESERVE No. 2393)............................................................... 63 A. THE RESERVE........................................................... 63 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships ............ 63 2. History..................................................................... 63 3. Soils and Vegetation................................................ 65 4. Fauna....................................................................... 65 5. Past Management, Use and Fire History................ 65 6. Nature Conservation Values ............................... .... 67 B. PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT................................... 67 1. Management Objectives.......................................... 67 2. Fire Protection......................................................... 68 3. Protection From Pests: Animal and Weed Control............................... 68 4. Public Use................................................................ 69 5. Research .................................................................. 69 6. Management~General........................... .. ...... .. ..... 69 PART 8. WONGAMINE NATURE RESERVE (RESERVE No. 33697) ............................................................. 71 A. THERESERVE........................................................... 71 1. Physical Characteristics and Relationships ....... ..... 71 2. History..................................................................... 71 3. Soils and Vegetation................................................ 73 4. Fauna......................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Holland in Australia 1945 – 1987
    Sssssspppp NEW HOLLAND IN AUSTRALIA 1945 - 1987 NEW HOLLAND IN AUSTRALIA 1945 – 1987 By: Ray Smith.. November 1989 The first New Holland machines, two Model 75 balers, arrived in Australia under a war-time Government lend lease arrangement in 1945. However, the foundation on which New Holland Australia was build commenced a year later when Doring Implements was formed to import and retail the Model 76. From a small office located in a suburb (St Kilda) of Melbourne, Victoria, Doring, owned and managed by New Zealand born Basil Horne, imported product through Henry R. Jahn, New York. Although Horne was an associate of Cecil Taylor, who, at about the same time started a similar operation in New Zealand here was no company or known financial connection. With the arrival of spares for the first shipment of six Model 76 balers in 1947, a move was made to “larger” premises – a single fronted two story shop front building in the busy nearby suburb of Prahran. Doring used these premises as their HQ thru to 1953, when 6 acres were purchased some 20 miles from the centre of Melbourne (Dandenong) on the main highway to the rich agricultural area of Gippsland. An assembly and parts building fronted by a large showroom and office complex was built, complete with a wall mounted mural painted by famous Australian painter William Dargy. A sign across the front of the building “The Home Of New Holland” reinforced the strong bond, based on trust and loyalty that had developed between company and clients. This valuable relationship with owners (mostly strategically located contractors (custom operators)) developed through dealing direct and being given first rate field and parts service.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL and PROCEEDINGS
    JOURNAL and PROCEEDINGS of The Royal Society of New South Wales Volume 143 Parts 1 and 2 Numbers 435–436 2010 THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW SOUTH WALES OFFICE BEARERS FOR 2009-2010 Patrons Her Excellency Ms Quentin Bryce AC Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia. Her Excellency Professor Marie Bashir AC CVO Governor of New South Wales. President Mr J.R. Hardie, BSc Syd, FGS, MACE Vice Presidents Em. Prof. H. Hora Mr C.M. Wilmot Hon. Secretary (Ed.) Dr D. Hector Hon. Secretary (Gen.) Mr B.R. Welch Hon. Treasurer Ms M. Haire BSc, Dip Ed. Hon. Librarian vacant Councillors Mr A.J. Buttenshaw Mr J. Franklin BSc ANU Ms Julie Haeusler Dr Don Hector Dr Fred Osman A/Prof. W.A. Sewell, MB, BS, BSc Syd, PhD Melb FRCPA Prof. Bruce A. Warren Southern Highlands Rep. Mr C.M. Wilmot EDITORIAL BOARD Dr D. Hector Prof. D. Brynn Hibbert Prof. J. Kelly, BSc Syd, PhD Reading, DSc NSW, FAIP, FInstP Prof. Bruce A. Warren Dr M. Lake, PhD Syd Mr J. Franklin BSc ANU Mr B. Welch The Society originated in the year 1821 as the Philosophical Society of Australasia. Its main function is the promotion of Science by: publishing results of scientific investigations in its Journal and Proceedings; conducting monthly meetings; awarding prizes and medals; and by liason with other scientific societies. Membership is open to any person whose application is acceptable to the Society. Subscriptions for the Journal are also accepted. The Society welcomes, from members and non-members, manuscripts of research and review articles in all branches of science, art, literature and philosophy for publication in the Journal and Proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • LAYING CLIO's GHOSTS on the SHORES of NEW HOLLAND* the Title Does Not Foreshadow an Ex
    EMPTY HISTORICAL BOXES OF THE EARLY DAYS: LAYING CLIO'S GHOSTS ON THE SHORES OF NEW HOLLAND* By DUNCAN ~T ACC.ALU'M HE title does not foreshadow an exhumation of the village Hampdens, as Webb T called them,! buried on the shores of Botany Bay. In fact, they were probably thieves, but let their ;-emains rest in peace. No, the metaphor in the title is from an analogy from a memorable controversy in value theory in Economics. 2 The title was meant to suggest the need for giving some historical content to the emotions that have accompanied discussions of the early period. Some of the figures which seem to have been conjured up by historical writers have been given malignancy but 110t identity. Yet these faceless men of the past, and the roles for which they have been cast, seem to distort the play of life. And indeed, it is perhaps because the historical boxes have remained unfilled, and because the background-the rest of the play and action-has not been fully explored, that some people of the early period, well known to us by name, have been interpreted in the light of twentieth-century prejudice and political controversy. We know all too little about the quality of day-to-day life in early Australia, the spiritual and material existence of the early Europeans, their energies, their activities and outlook. In the first stage of an inquiry I have been pursuing into our early social history, I am concerned not with these more elusive yet in a way more interesting questions, but in what sort of colony it was with the officers, the gaol and the port.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Causes of the Extirpation of the Providence Petrel (Pterodroma Solandri) on Norfolk Island
    246 Notornis, 2002, Vol. 49: 246-258 0029-4470 O The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. 2002 History and causes of the extirpation of the Providence petrel (Pterodroma solandri) on Norfolk Island DAVID G. MEDWAY 25A Norman Street, New Plymouth, New Zealand [email protected] Abstract The population of Providence petrels (Pterodroma solandri) that nested on Norfolk Island at the time of 1st European settlement of that island in 1788 was probably > 1 million pairs. Available evidence indicates that Europeans harvested many more Providence petrels in the years immediately after settlement than previously believed. About 1,000,000 Providence petrels, adults and young, were harvested in the 4 breeding seasons from 1790 to 1793 alone. Despite these enormous losses, many Providence petrels were apparently still nesting on Norfolk Island in 1795 when they are last mentioned in documents from the island. However, any breeding population that may have survived there until 1814 when Norfolk Island was abandoned temporarily was probably exterminated by the combined activities of introduced cats and pigs which had become very numerous by the time the island was re-occupied in 1825. Medway, D.G. 2002. History and causes of the exhrpation of the Providence petrel (Pterodroma solandri) on Norfolk Island. Notornis 49(4): 246-258. Keywords Norfolk Island; Providence petrel; Pterodroma solandri; human harvesting; mammalian predation; extupation INTRODUCTION in to a hole which was concealed by the birds Norfolk Island (29" 02'S, 167" 57'E; 3455 ha), an making their burrows slant-wise". From the Australian external territory, is a sub-tropical summit, King had a view of the whole island and island in the south-west Pacific.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Masterplan & Irrigation Management Strategy
    APPENDIX 6 Landscape Masterplan & Irrigation Management Strategy 02 06 04 07 04 06 03 01 05 07 10 02 07 09 09 04 03 11 08 03 07 02 08 HIGH SCHOOL TO PROVIDE 07 IRRIGATION & WATER ALLOCATION FOR OVAL 04 01 HILBERT ROAD PRIMARY SCHOOL 09 HIGH SCHOOL 03 02 01 05 CYPRESS AVE MARARA ST MARARA LOOP LYTEA LUTEA LOOPLUTEA BRUSH ST OCHRE ST HOPKINSON ROAD ROWLEY ROAD LEGEND LEGEND IRRIGATION LEGEND EXISTING TREES TO BE RETAINED EXTENT OF WORKS 27,435m2 - TURF PEDESTRIAN ACCESS OVER SWALE SHADE STRUCTURES PROPOSED STREET TREE 01 & PROTECTED PENDING LEVELS & DRAINAGE 07 (PERMANENT ALLOCATION) VIEWING DECK AND SHELTER OVER BASIN 02 COMMUNITY PARK / INFORMAL KICKABOUT 08 ROLL ON TURF PLAYSPACE PROPOSED SWALE TREE 28,100m2 - GENERAL SHRUB PLANTING (ESTABLISHMENT ALLOCATION) SHADE STRUCTURES & BBQ FACILITIES 03 LANDSCAPED DRAINAGE BASIN / PARK AVENUE 09 NATIVE SHRUB PLANTING 7,360m2 - SHRUB PLANTING TO BRA CULTURAL & HERITAGE AREA LIVING STREAM PROPOSED POS TREE 04 ROAD SIDE SWALE 10 (WINTER PLANTING & HAND WATERING FOR ESTABLISHMENT) DISTRICT OPEN SPACE 15,120m2 - SHRUB PLANTING TO LIVING 05 PLAY AMENITIES 11 PEDESTRIAN/SHARED USE PATH DRAINAGE BASIN STREAM & ROADSIDE SWALES 06 WUNGONG FORESHORE (WINTER PLANTING & HAND WATERING FOR ESTABLISHMENT) CONCRETE HARDSTAND TIMBER DECKING / BOARDWALK 7,905m2 - REVEG PLANTING TO WUNGONG FORESHORE (WINTER PLANTING & HAND WATERING FOR ESTABLISHMENT) RETAINING WALLS DWG FO-LSP-01 0 1020304050 THE PRECINCT 21 STRUCTURE PLAN REV C m DATE 24-03-21 SCALE 1 : 2000 @ A3 © THIS DRAWING CAN NOT BE PUBLISHED OR DISPLAYED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE CLIENT AND AUTHOR, AND IS ISSUED FOR LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND MAY ALTER WITHOUT NOTIFICATION.
    [Show full text]
  • Gloucester Park, Margaret
    Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River Prepared November 2016 for the Shire of Augusta Margaret River Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River, November 2016 This document has been prepared by Litoria Ecoservices for the express use of the client. Litoria Ecoservices accepts no responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of Litoria Ecoservices. Version Control Version Date Version Purpose Author Draft 1 29/11/ 2016 Draft for client review DMcK Final 1 5/12/2016 Complete Report D McK Flora and Fauna Assessment Gloucester Park, Margaret River, November 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Site Description .................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Assessment Objectives and Scope ....................................................................... 2 1.5 Personnel .............................................................................................................. 3 1.6 Landform .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GENOME EVOLUTION in MONOCOTS a Dissertation
    GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School At the University of Missouri In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy By Kate L. Hertweck Dr. J. Chris Pires, Dissertation Advisor JULY 2011 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the dissertation entitled GENOME EVOLUTION IN MONOCOTS Presented by Kate L. Hertweck A candidate for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy And hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. Dr. J. Chris Pires Dr. Lori Eggert Dr. Candace Galen Dr. Rose‐Marie Muzika ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am indebted to many people for their assistance during the course of my graduate education. I would not have derived such a keen understanding of the learning process without the tutelage of Dr. Sandi Abell. Members of the Pires lab provided prolific support in improving lab techniques, computational analysis, greenhouse maintenance, and writing support. Team Monocot, including Dr. Mike Kinney, Dr. Roxi Steele, and Erica Wheeler were particularly helpful, but other lab members working on Brassicaceae (Dr. Zhiyong Xiong, Dr. Maqsood Rehman, Pat Edger, Tatiana Arias, Dustin Mayfield) all provided vital support as well. I am also grateful for the support of a high school student, Cady Anderson, and an undergraduate, Tori Docktor, for their assistance in laboratory procedures. Many people, scientist and otherwise, helped with field collections: Dr. Travis Columbus, Hester Bell, Doug and Judy McGoon, Julie Ketner, Katy Klymus, and William Alexander. Many thanks to Barb Sonderman for taking care of my greenhouse collection of many odd plants brought back from the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerful Pollinators Encouraging Insect Pollinators in Farm Landscapes
    Bilpin, Blue Mountains: NSW Powerful pollinators Encouraging insect pollinators in farm landscapes Pollinators are an essential component of agricultural production and of healthy, biodiverse landscapes. Protecting and enhancing pollinator resources on farms will help support a diverse range of pollinators. This brochure provides an introduction to encouraging insect pollinators on farms, including a guide to choosing plants that will support diverse pollinators throughout the year. The power of pollinators Pollinators – mostly insects, but also birds and mammals – assist the formation of seeds and fruit in many plant species by visiting flowers in search of food (nectar and/or pollen). Whilst foraging they transfer pollen from one flower to another, facilitating fertilization, which results in fruits and seeds. Honey bees, native bees and other native insects like hoverflies, wasps and butterflies provide essential © Amy-Marie Gilpin pollination services for native plants, Native vegetation supports pollinators by providing food and nesting sites. Nearby crops and garden flowers, fruits and vegetables. pastures will benefit from the increased abundance and diversity of pollinators in the landscape. Pollinators and food security Insect populations are in decline Backyard biodiversity Without insect pollinators, the quantity worldwide due to land clearing, Insect pollinators are a prime example and diversity of food and flowers intensive or monocultural of the importance of healthy ecosystems grown in backyard gardens would be agriculture, pesticide use, in urban gardens, parks and reserves. severely restricted. Many of the foods Insects are the ‘canaries in the coal mine’ we eat, from gardens and farms, pollution, colony disease, of our urban and rural environments. benefit from pollination.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Interfamilial Relationships and Patterns of floral Evolution in the Eudicot Order Fabales
    Cladistics Cladistics 1 (2012) 1–29 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00392.x Combined phylogenetic analyses reveal interfamilial relationships and patterns of floral evolution in the eudicot order Fabales M. Ange´ lica Belloa,b,c,*, Paula J. Rudallb and Julie A. Hawkinsa aSchool of Biological Sciences, Lyle Tower, the University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX, UK; bJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; cReal Jardı´n Bota´nico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, CP 28014 Madrid, Spain Accepted 5 January 2012 Abstract Relationships between the four families placed in the angiosperm order Fabales (Leguminosae, Polygalaceae, Quillajaceae, Surianaceae) were hitherto poorly resolved. We combine published molecular data for the chloroplast regions matK and rbcL with 66 morphological characters surveyed for 73 ingroup and two outgroup species, and use Parsimony and Bayesian approaches to explore matrices with different missing data. All combined analyses using Parsimony recovered the topology Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). Bayesian analyses with matched morphological and molecular sampling recover the same topology, but analyses based on other data recover a different Bayesian topology: ((Polygalaceae + Leguminosae) (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). We explore the evolution of floral characters in the context of the more consistent topology: Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). This reveals synapomorphies for (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Suri- anaceae)) as the presence of free filaments and marginal ⁄ ventral placentation, for (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae) as pentamery and apocarpy, and for Leguminosae the presence of an abaxial median sepal and unicarpellate gynoecium. An octamerous androecium is synapomorphic for Polygalaceae. The development of papilionate flowers, and the evolutionary context in which these phenotypes appeared in Leguminosae and Polygalaceae, shows that the morphologies are convergent rather than synapomorphic within Fabales.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Vegetation Of
    __________________________________________________________________________________________ FLORA AND VEGETATION OF AVIVA LEASE AREA Prepared for: URS Australia Pty Ltd on behalf of Aviva Corporation Ltd Prepared by: Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd February 2009 MATTISKE CONSULTING PTY LTD URS0808/195/08 MATTISKE CONSULTING PTY LTD __________________________________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location .............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2 Climate ................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Landforms and Soils ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2.5 Declared Rare, Priority and Threatened Species ................................................................................. 4 2.6 Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC’s) ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes
    Networks in a Large-Scale Phylogenetic Analysis: Reconstructing Evolutionary History of Asparagales (Lilianae) Based on Four Plastid Genes Shichao Chen1., Dong-Kap Kim2., Mark W. Chase3, Joo-Hwan Kim4* 1 College of Life Science and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2 Division of Forest Resource Conservation, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Gyeonggi- do, Korea, 3 Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom, 4 Department of Life Science, Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea Abstract Phylogenetic analysis aims to produce a bifurcating tree, which disregards conflicting signals and displays only those that are present in a large proportion of the data. However, any character (or tree) conflict in a dataset allows the exploration of support for various evolutionary hypotheses. Although data-display network approaches exist, biologists cannot easily and routinely use them to compute rooted phylogenetic networks on real datasets containing hundreds of taxa. Here, we constructed an original neighbour-net for a large dataset of Asparagales to highlight the aspects of the resulting network that will be important for interpreting phylogeny. The analyses were largely conducted with new data collected for the same loci as in previous studies, but from different species accessions and greater sampling in many cases than in published analyses. The network tree summarised the majority data pattern in the characters of plastid sequences before tree building, which largely confirmed the currently recognised phylogenetic relationships. Most conflicting signals are at the base of each group along the Asparagales backbone, which helps us to establish the expectancy and advance our understanding of some difficult taxa relationships and their phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Comesperma Sp
    Number 8 September 2019 DO YOU KNOW THESE SPECIES? Photography & text by Margaret MacDonald Comesperma sp. (come = hair of the head, sperma = seed referring to the tuft of hairs on the seeds of most species). Family: POLYGALACEAE Four species of Comesperma grow in the Anglesea district, an endemic Australian genus of approximately 30 species. They are small perennial shrubs, subshrubs or twiners. Flowers of the Comesperma family look superficially like those of the pea family but there are some significant differences. Leaves are alternate and simple, and the inflorescence is held in a raceme at the end of the flowering stem. There are five unequal sepals with one pair enlarged and often petal-like, and 3 smaller sepals. There are 3 or 5 petals with the lower petal lobed or pouched. Love Creeper, Comesperma volubile (volubilis = twining) The most widespread of the four species, this attractive twiner can be found in woodland and heathland areas. Not apparent for most of the year, racemes of tiny blue flowers appear on slender stems in early spring and can often be seen extensively draped overhead. Love Creeper is almost leafless. Blue-spike Milkwort, Comesperma calygema (calygema = with a large cover) This is a stiff, erect small subshrub that grows in heathland and arises annually from a rhizome. It bears a raceme of deep blue flowers on the top of the flower stems that grow to about 30 cm tall. The leaves are usually found in the lower section of the flowering stem. It is widespread and quite common. Small Milkwort, Comesperma polygaloides (polygaloides = resembling Polygala) A small colony of this subshrub that grows to about 30 cm high was found in summer 2017 at Pt Addis after having been missing from the area for a long period of time.
    [Show full text]