High-field Carrier Velocity and Current Saturation in Graphene Field-effect Transistors
Brett W. Scott, Student Member, IEEE and Jean-Pierre Leburton, Fellow, IEEE Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801 e-mail: [email protected]
Abstract-We obtain the output characteristics of graphene field-effect transistors by using the charge-control model for the current, based on the solution of the Boltzmann equation in the field-dependent relaxation time approximation. Closed expressions for the conductance, transconductance and saturation voltage are derived. We found good agreement with the experimental data of Meric et al. [1], without assuming a carrier density-dependent velocity saturation.
I. INTRODUCTION In recent years, graphene has emerged as a novel mono-layer material with exotic physical properties for applications in high performance electronic devices [1, 2]. Namely the relation between the charge carrier energy E and the two-dimensional (2D) wave vector is linear i.e. , where 8 = + = ħ vf ~ 10 cm/s is the Fermi velocity, thereby reducing the band gap to a single point (Dirac point) [3]. In this framework all carriers have a velocity with the same absolute value that is one order of magnitude larger than in conventional III-V materials [4], making graphene a promising candidate for high- Fig. 1. Schematic of the GFET device. speed nanoelectronics. Recently, graphene field-effect transistors (GFETs) were Vgback . A top gate of length L separated from the graphene successfully fabricated, and exhibited I-V characteristics mono-layer by a thinner oxide with capacitance Ctop controls similar to conventional silicon MOS transistors [1]. Low field the carriers in the channel with Vgtop . For the sake of mobilities were however strongly degraded by the presence of comparison with experiment, we will only consider p-channel coulombic space charge in the neighboring oxides, whereas device operation, but our model is valid for n-channel nonlinearities in the current-voltage characteristics were operation as well. interpreted as caused by carrier velocity saturation for which III. MODEL the value would depend on the carrier concentration induced by gate voltages in the 2D graphene mono-layer. In the relaxation time approximation, current in a 2D In this paper, we developed a charge-control model for graphene layer at room temperature is diffusive and given by GFETs that does not require the assumption of carrier density- dependent saturation velocity to reproduce the experimental 2 (1) = characteristics. Our model also provides closed form analytic ℎ expressions for the saturation voltage, conductance and transconductance of the device. where W is the graphene layer width, p is the hole concentration, F is the electric field and τ(p) is the relaxation II. TRANSISTOR STRUCTURE time for a particular carrier concentration. In the high field regime, we assume where Fc is the Fig. 1 shows a schematic of the GFET, where the graphene = / 1 + critical field for the onset of high energy collisions such as mono-layer sits on a thick SiO 2 layer with capacitance Cback on remote phonons, for instance, / is the low top of a back gate that controls the source and drain resistance = field relaxation time dominated by scattering with charged Rs at the same time as the channel threshold voltage with bias τ impurities with density Ni, and 0 is a time constant. By setting (a) , one recovers the conventional current μ = ħ / expression
(2) = with , where the low field = μ / 1 + conductance , as observed experimentally. ∝ In the charge-control model, and for p>> p0 (which is the case for all data in [1]), where p0 is the minimum sheet carrier concentration, one can write = − [ − ] where V(x) is the electric potential along the channel from source to drain, and . Here V0 is the = − < 0 threshold voltage of the GFET and is defined in [1] by where and = + − are the top and back gate voltages at the Dirac point respectively. By integrating the current equation (2) from source to drain in the gradual channel approximation as in conventional MOS devices [7], and by taking into account the series resistance Rs at the source and drain, we get (b) 1 = − + 4 (3)
+ − + − 4
where Vds is the drain-source voltage, and . = μ − − 2 = From the current expression (3), the transistor conductance gd at low drain-source bias and the saturation voltage Vds(sat) are readily obtained,
− (4) → 0 = 2 −
2 1 − = + 1 + 1 + (5) − − 2 1 +
Fig. 2. Inverse of the small-signal source-drain conductance (1/ gds ) as a while the transconductance at saturation is given by function of the inverse of the top gate voltage minus the threshold voltage (1/ Vg0 ) for (a) Vgback = -40 V and (b) Vgback = +40 V.