2015 Integrated Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One) [ ] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 OR [ ] SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of event requiring this shell company report ............................................ For the transition period from .................... to ................................. Commission file number 1- 32479 TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Republic of The Marshall Islands (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 4th Floor, Belvedere Building, 69 Pitts Bay Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda Telephone: (441) 298-2530 (Address and telephone number of principal executive offices) Mark Cave 4th Floor, Belvedere Building, 69 Pitts Bay Road, Hamilton, HM 08, Bermuda Telephone: (441) 298-2530 Fax: (441) 292-3931 (Contact information for company contact person) Securities registered, or to be registered, pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Units New York Stock Exchange Securities registered, or to be registered, pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each issuer‘s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. -
Delegate List As of 1 October 2018
Delegate list as of 1 October 2018 Job Title Company Country Head of Research and Development Division AB Lifosa Lithuania Technical Director AB Lifosa Lithuania Technical Engineer AB Lifosa Lithuania Abu Zaabel for Fertilizer & Chemical Company Manager of Sulfuric Acid Unit (AZFC) Egypt General Manager ACCS Ltd United Kingdom Director ACCS Ltd United Kingdom Purchasing Director Adisseo France SAS France Managing Director AECI Limited South Africa Commercial Director Chemical Initiatives AECI Limited South Africa Executive & Chemical Engineer AECI Limited South Africa Manager Procurement and Sales Aglobis AG Switzerland CEO Aglobis Group Aglobis GmbH Germany Vice President Marketing & Sales Aglobis GmbH Germany Product Engineer AGRU Kunststofftechnik GmbH Austria . AGRU Kunststofftechnik GmbH Austria General Manager Alberta Sulphur Research Ltd (ASRL) Canada Director of Research Alberta Sulphur Research Ltd (ASRL) Canada Global Segment Director: Chemical Industry Aliaxis Participations SA/NV Belgium Product Manager Ameropa AG Switzerland Director of Sales & Service AMETEK GmbH Germany Global Sales Manager AMETEK Precision Instruments/France France General Director of Technical Policy Apatit, AO Russian Federation Interpreter Apatit, AO Russian Federation Chief Specialist Project Manager Apatit, AO Russian Federation Acid Plants Operations Manager Atlantic Copper Spain Director Sulphuric Acid Aurubis AG Germany Technologist Acid Plant Aurubis Bulgaria Bulgaria R&D Team Leader Aurubis Bulgaria Bulgaria Director Acid & Waste Water Treatment -
Pat Panzarino – Vice President Coal Trading, Trammo, Inc
Trammo Pat Panzarino Presentation to NCCI 2016 A Trader’s View of The Market. GLOBAL INDEPENDENT RELIABLE Agenda • Gratuitous Trammo Inc. promotion • Quotes I Like • Impacts • Global Coal Factoids • Developments since 2012 and…most recent surprises • Possible future trends/conclusions • Metrics…what should You watch? 2 Trammo Group • Private company founded in 1965 with corporate head quarters in New York • 450 employees in 32 different locations • Worldwide trade volume in excess of 43 million metric tons • Turnover in 2014 of US$ 12.2 billion ranking Trammo as one of the largest private companies in the USA • One of the World's leading fertilizer and industrial commodities trading companies in both in volume and revenue 3 Organizational Structure Trammo, Inc. (New York) Fertilizers & Chemicals Ammonia Gas Division Commodities Division Division Division (incl. SEA-3) Trading in fertilizers, raw Trading in Trading in Trading in & materials, energy related petrochemicals ammonia distribution of LPG products, soft commodities and dry bulk freight 4 Worldwide Offices Moscow Breda Oostvoorne London Poznan HungaryBudapest Meredosia Paris Odessa Newington Bucharest Almaty Beijing West Des Moines Darien Zurich Istanbul Adams Amman Seoul New York Nanjing Woodlands Shanghai Houston Cairo Karachi Tampa New Delhi Taiwan Dubai Dakar Bangkok Ho Chi Minh Singapore Jakarta Sao Paulo Johannesburg Santiago de Chile Buenos Aires Trans Sud Ltda., Chile 32 Offices 9 Agents 1 Joint Venture 5 Group Timeline $ 12.2 billion 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2005 in Sales 1965 1978 1985 1992 2000 2010 Founded as Worldwide LPG Purchases Sea-3, Inc.; Establishes Joint Sea-3 of Florida TA Bulk Carriers enters trader of Ammonia trading propane import and Venture with propane import and the commodity shipping marketing terminal in Sinochem for entry marketing terminal business New Hampshire, USA into the Chinese begins operation in fertilizer market Tampa, Florida, USA 2011 Commences Coal 2000 Trading activity 1967 1986 1992 Olefins merchandising Worldwide fertilizer U.S. -
Redstone Commodity Update Q3
Welcome to the Redstone Commodity Update 2020: Q3 Welcome to the Redstone Commodity Moves Update Q3 2020, another quarter in a year that has been strongly defined by the pandemic. Overall recruitment levels across the board are still down, although we have seen some pockets of hiring intent. There appears to be a general acknowledgement across all market segments that growth must still be encouraged and planned for, this has taken the form in some quite senior / structural moves. The types of hires witnessed tend to pre-empt more mid-junior levels hires within the same companies in following quarters, which leaves us predicting a stronger than expected finish to Q4 2020 and start to Q1 2021 than we had previously planned for coming out of Q2. The highest volume of moves tracked fell to the energy markets, notably, within power and gas and not within the traditional oil focused roles, overall, we are starting to see greater progress towards carbon neutrality targets. Banks such as ABN, BNP and SocGen have all reduced / pulled out providing commodity trade finance, we can expect competition for the acquiring of finance lines to heat up in the coming months until either new lenders step into the market or more traditional lenders swallow up much of the market. We must also be aware of the potential impact of the US elections on global trade as countries such as Great Britain and China (amongst others) await the outcome of the impending election. Many national trade strategies and corporate investment strategies will hinge on this result in a way that no previous election has. -
AFPM 2014 Annual Report
PROSPERITY FUELING AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS 2014 ANNUAL REPORT AMERICAN ENERGY POLICY AT A CROSSROADS A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD AND THE PRESIDENT OF AFPM Last year, the United States became the Today, American energy policy is at a For the refining and petrochemical world’s top producer of oil and natural gas, crossroads. The issues at stake and manufacturing industries, 2014 will prove a position that no one would have predicted the policy decisions to be made have to be a pivotal year. As a country, we face just five years ago. As a result, American never been more important. A surge crucial choices as we endeavor to maintain fuel and petrochemical manufacturers in regulations, coupled with a basic access to affordable, reliable and secure now have the opportunity and the ability to misunderstanding of the fossil fuel industry, energy sources. transform the nation’s economic outlook. hampers the ability to establish sound policies and regulations that will enable us Working on behalf of and in concert with Embracing the strong global demand to continue the progress we’ve made toward our members, AFPM will continue to: for high-quality, affordable refined renewed economic growth. petroleum and petrochemical products, • Advocate for a regulatory environment AFPM companies are putting economics Fossil fuels have been an essential part that is straightforward and effective. and infrastructure to work. Refiners are of our daily lives for so long that their true meeting America’s fuel needs, maintaining impact can easily be taken for granted. • Educate policymakers and the public a strategic inventory and becoming a key But make no mistake – they don’t just to ensure the benefits of fossil fuels are exporter. -
US Sanctions on Russia
U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L. -
Schedule of Investments (Unaudited) Blackrock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund January 31, 2021 (Percentages Shown Are Based on Net Assets)
Schedule of Investments (unaudited) BlackRock Advantage Emerging Markets Fund January 31, 2021 (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) Security Shares Value Security Shares Value Common Stocks China (continued) China Life Insurance Co. Ltd., Class H .................. 221,000 $ 469,352 Argentina — 0.0% China Longyuan Power Group Corp. Ltd., Class H ....... 52,000 76,119 (a) 313 $ 60,096 Globant SA .......................................... China Mengniu Dairy Co. Ltd.(a) ......................... 15,000 89,204 Brazil — 4.9% China Merchants Bank Co. Ltd., Class H ................ 36,000 275,683 Ambev SA ............................................. 236,473 653,052 China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd.................. 66,500 151,059 Ambev SA, ADR ....................................... 94,305 263,111 China Pacific Insurance Group Co. Ltd., Class H......... 22,000 90,613 B2W Cia Digital(a) ...................................... 20,949 315,188 China Railway Group Ltd., Class A ...................... 168,800 138,225 B3 SA - Brasil Bolsa Balcao............................. 33,643 367,703 China Resources Gas Group Ltd. ....................... 30,000 149,433 Banco do Brasil SA..................................... 15,200 94,066 China Resources Land Ltd. ............................. 34,000 134,543 BRF SA(a).............................................. 22,103 85,723 China Resources Pharmaceutical Group Ltd.(b) .......... 119,500 62,753 BRF SA, ADR(a) ........................................ 54,210 213,045 China Vanke Co. Ltd., Class A .......................... 67,300 289,157 Cia de Saneamento de Minas Gerais-COPASA .......... 52,947 150,091 China Vanke Co. Ltd., Class H .......................... 47,600 170,306 Duratex SA ............................................ 19,771 71,801 CITIC Ltd............................................... 239,000 186,055 Embraer SA(a).......................................... 56,573 90,887 Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd., Class A .... 1,700 92,204 Gerdau SA, ADR ...................................... -
An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia's Largest
An Overview of Boards of Directors at Russia’s Largest Public Companies Andrei Rakitin Milena Barsukova Arina Mazunova Translated from Russian August 2020 Key Results According to information disclosed by 109 of Russia’s largest public companies: • “Classic” board compositions of 11, nine, and seven seats prevail • The total number of persons on Boards of the companies under study is not as low as it might seem: 89% of all Directors were elected to only one such Board • Female Directors account for 12% and are more often elected to the audit, nomination, and remuneration committees than to the strategy committee • Among Directors, there are more “humanitarians” than “techies”, while the share of “techies” among chairs is greater than across the whole sample • The average age for Directors is 53, 56 for Chairmen, and 58 for Independent Directors • Generation X is the most visible on Boards, and Generation Y Directors will likely quickly increase their presence if the development of digital technologies continues • The share of Independent Directors barely reaches 30%, and there is an obvious lack of independence on key committees such as audit • Senior Independent Directors were elected at 17% of the companies, while 89% of Chairs are not independent • The average total remuneration paid to the Board of Directors is RUR 69 million, with the difference between the maximum and minimum being 18 times • Twenty-four percent of companies disclosed information on individual payments made to their Directors. According to this, the average total remuneration is approximately RUR 9 million per annum for a Director, RUR 17 million for a Chair, and RUR 11 million for an Independent Director The comparison of 2020 findings with results of a similar study published in 2012 paints an interesting dynamic picture. -
ROADSHOW PRESENTATION February 2013
ROADSHOW PRESENTATION February 2013 0 Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an offer or invitation to sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe for or purchase any securities, and nothing contained herein shall form the basis of any contract or commitment whatsoever. No reliance may be placed for any purposes whatsoever on the information contained in this presentation or on its completeness, accuracy or fairness. This document, its presentation and its contents are confidential and are being provided to you solely for your information and may not be copied, recorded, retransmitted, further distributed to any other person or published, in whole or in part, by any medium or in any form for any purpose. The opinions presented herein are based on general information gathered at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. We rely on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but do not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Investors and prospective investors in securities of the Company are required to make their own independent investigation and appraisal of the business and financial condition of the Company and the nature of the securities. Any decision to purchase securities in the context of the proposed Offering, if any, should be made solely on the basis of information contained in an offering circular or prospectus published in relation to such Offering. No reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information contained in this presentation, or any other material discussed verbally, or on its completeness, accuracy or fairness. This presentation does not constitute a recommendation regarding securities of the Company. -
Companies Registered for GTR Russia Trade & Export Finance
Companies registered for GTR Russia Trade & Export Finance Conference 2017 ( April 12, Moscow ) As per April 3rd Company Accuity Acron Aeroflot – Russian Airlines Agroterra Logistics AKA Ausfuhrkredit-Gesellschaft mbH Albion Overseas Alfa-Bank Allen & Overy LLP Antipinsky Refinery Aon Aston Enterprise Auchan Bank Otkritie Financial Corporation Belarusian Potash Company BNY Mellon Bosco China Development Bank ChTPZ Commerzbank AG Confectionary Factory "Pobeda" Cotton Club Credit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank CS-Broker (Centr Sodruzhestva) Danone Deloitte Eastern Mining Company Egger EKN Erconproduct Eurasia Drilling Company EuroChem Everbridge Capital Evraz EXIAR - Export Insurance Agency of Russia Export-Import Bank of Hungary Gazprom GE Energy GE Healthcare GV Gold Henderson Herbert Smith Freehills Highland Gold Mining Holman Fenwick Willan HSBC Huawei Technologies Hungary Exim ICC Banking Commission Indukern-Rus ING International Finance Corporation (IFC) International Investment Bank Invest Company Group Jeans Symphony Jiulongfu Trading Joy Global JSC Arkhangelsk Pulp & Paper Mill KfW IPEX Bank Khaskel KOKS LBBW LLC Agrochemicals LogPro London Institute of Banking & Finance LUKOIL Lysva Metallurgical Company M3 Tonar Mechel Metro Cash & Carry Mizuho Bank MMK Natixis NewStream Trading Nizhnekamskneftekhim NLMK Nokia Norilsk Nickel Nova Roll Novatek Oesterreichische Kontrollbank AG (OeKB) OJSC Phosagro OMK Group Outspan International Phosagro PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) Raiffeisen Bank International Rani plast Kaluga Renaissance Construction ROLF Group Rosatom Rosneft Rusagro Group Rusal Russian Leather Russian Platinum RussNeft RZD International S7 Airlines (PJSC Siberia Airlines) Salym Petroleum Sberbank CIB SEB Group Senege Severstal Shate-M+ Sibur Siemens Sinosure Snow Queen SODEXO Sodruzhestvo SUEK Sumitomo Corporation Sveza TD Bashchem Tropic International TVEL TVOYO UBI Banca UniCredit SpA United Energy Commodities United Wagon Company Trading House Uralchem Uralkali Velpharm Volga Tannery VTB Bank White & Case LLP Zarubezhneft Zenden . -
ESG Ranking of Russian Companies 2020 (As of 11.11.2020)
ESG Ranking of Russian companies 2020 (as of 11.11.2020) Company Industry Sub-industry ESG Rank E Rank S Rank G Rank LUKOIL Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 1 3 10 2 SIBUR Holding Chemicals Petrochemicals 2 1 4 10 Passenger Russian Railways Transport Transportation, Ground 3 11 8 4 & Sea Wireless MTS Telecom Telecommunications 4 18 5 3 Services NLMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 5 6 2 16 Inter RAO Energy Electric Utilities 6 2 6 17 Integrated Rostelecom Telecom Telecommunications 7 17 12 8 Services Rosatom Energy Nuclear energy 8 8 23 5 SUEK Metals&Mining Coal 9 13 11 15 Sakhalin Energy Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 10 7 7 29 Gazprom Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 11 4 14 22 Severstal Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 12 24 3 11 Polyus Metals&Mining Gold 13 14 9 20 Non-Gold Precious ALROSA Metals&Mining 14 15 17 9 Metals & Minerals Sistema Holdings Holdings 15 20 15 13 Aeroflot Transport Airlines 16 26 1 27 FGC UES Energy Electric Utilities 17 12 30 1 RusHydro Energy Electric Utilities 18 5 16 26 Rosneft Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 19 9 22 18 Rosseti Energy Electric Utilities 20 10 28 6 Phosagro Chemicals Agricultural Chemicals 21 19 24 14 Specialty Mining & Rusal Metals&Mining 22 16 19 25 Metals NOVATEK Oil&Gas Integrated Oil & Gas 23 23 18 21 MMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 24 22 25 12 Oil & Gas Transportation TransNeft Oil&Gas 25 28 29 7 Services EVRAZ Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 26 29 20 24 Metalloinvest Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 27 21 21 31 TMK Metals&Mining Iron & Steel 28 25 27 28 Specialty Mining & Nornickel Metals&Mining 29 31 13 23 Metals Tatneft -
Equity Markets, Political Situations, and Possible Strategies
Equity Markets, Political Situations, and Possible Strategies Tension between the West and Russia over Ukraine over Ukraine has seemed to change slightly. The remain intact. Unfortunately, we did not anticipate a European media in particular has started to report political escalation in Ukraine and its negative influence more critically on Ukraine and its current government. on European equities markets. Comparing the US and After the referendum in Donetsk and Lugansk region, European equity markets, the US performed slightly the Ukrainian government declared that it is willing to better. talk to separatist leaders. This is a good sign and we would recommend buying Russia equities, especially We have been monitoring the situation with Ukraine in the energy sector. Russian equities are comparably closely over the last couple of weeks. Our view is cheap, with the Market Vectors Russia ETF showing that Russia does not want to get openly involved in a Price-to-Earnings ratio of 5.44 and Price-to-Book Eastern/Southern Ukraine, as it may lead to a much of 0.7 compared to an average P/E of around 10 for more serious situation. Some groups in Ukraine Emerging Markets and around 15 for MSCI World, are trying to provoke Russia to intervene, which respectively. has not succeeded yet. Western media sentiment Micex 5-Year Development 1 The political situation can still undermine our overweight on developed markets, especially Europe. recommendations. As said before, we see the Major risks remain and investors should be aware of situation getting better now but one should not forget the fact that markets are volatile.