Statement of Consultation

Proposed Main Modifications Housing and Employment Allocations

January 2016 Contents

1.0 Introduction ...... 2 2.0 Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications Consultation ...... 2 Who was invited to make representations? ...... 2 How were they invited to make representations? ...... 2 Summary of comments and how they have been addressed ...... 3 Outcome ...... 3

Appendix A – Consultees

Appendix B – Letter to all consultees

Appendix C – Response form

Appendix D – Deposit locations

Appendix E – Summary of representations received

Appendix F – Schedule of Proposed Main Modifications

Appendix G – Schedule of Proposed Minor Modifications

1.0 Introduction

1.1 This statement has been published to accompany the Council‘s Propose Main Modifications on the Submission East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations (Site Allocations Plan).

1.2 The purpose of this statement is to provide a summary of the Councils’ consultation process and outcomes. The statement has been prepared in accordance with the Town and Country (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012.

2.0 Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications Consultation

2.1 The Site Allocations Plan Proposed Main Modifications was published for public consultation on 23 November and closed at 12 noon on 8 January 2016, lasting for a period of six weeks.

Who was invited to make representations?

2.2 All ‘specific consultation bodies’, ‘general consultation bodies’ and Councillors were consulted. A full list of those bodies that were sent notification of the public consultation can be found within Appendix A.

2.3 Also all those people who had expressed a wish for their contact details to be placed on the Council’s Local Plan consultation database were also invited to make representations (approximately 1,000 individuals and organisations). The consultation was open to all members of the public, District Councillors and Parish Council members.

How were they invited to make representations?

2.4 A letter was sent out by email or post to over 1,000 individuals and companies on the council’s database inviting them to make representations and explaining how to do so by either filling out a response form or writing to us by email or by post. All District Councillors and Parish Councils were also contacted with the same information. The letter sent can be found in Appendix B. A copy of the representations form can also be found in Appendix C.

2.5 All the Plan documents including the Proposed Main Modifications, Site Allocations Plan, the addendum Sustainability Appraisal and addendum Habitats Regulation Assessment statement were made available to view at the Council Offices as well as several deposit locations across the District (Appendix D).

2.6 All documents were available to download from the Council website (www.easthants.gov.uk) and details of how to make representations were available.

2.7 Consultees were invited to make representations on the Proposed Main Modifications only. A schedule of minor modifications, a plan showing the changes and a plan incorporating the changes were also made available.

Summary of comments and how they have been addressed

2.8 In total 30 individuals, organisations and statutory consultees commented. 7 representations received did not relate to the Proposed Main Modifications and were rejected by the Council. A written response was sent to each informing them of this. In total 186 comments were accepted on the proposed main modifications, 14 were in support of the changes. Table 1 provides a breakdown of the number of the representations received for each Policy. A summary of the comments received is attached at Appendix E. Appendix E only summarises the sections of representations which relate to the proposed modifications.

Policy Number of responses Policy EMP1 2 Policy EMP2 16 Policy HN1 31 Policy HN2 5 Policy LP1 18 Policy CF1 9 Policy CF2 2 Policy CF3 3 Policy RC1 8 Policy RC2 16 Policy RC3 4 Policy FM1 3 Policy FM2 3 Policy FM3 7 Policy VL1 2 Policy VL2 4 Policy VL3 5 Policy VL4 5 Policy VL5 4 Policy VL6 5 Policy VL7 4 Policy VL8 3 Policy VL9 2 Policy VL10 4 Policy VL11 3 Policy VL12 2 Policy VL13 4 General 5

Outcome

2.9 The outcome of the consultation has resulted in two of the proposed main modifications being withdrawn. These are MM53 and MM56 and they have been deleted from the schedule of proposed main modifications attached at appendix F.

2.10 A number of additional Minor Modifications have also been added. A full list of these is set out in Appendix G.

Appendix A – Consultees

Organisation

6a Vision A.H. Graham & Partners A.O Broadway A2 Dominion Group Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd Adams Integra Advoco Planning Alice Holt Action Group Alliance Planning Alton Business Club Alton Chamber of Commerce Alton Chamber of Commerce and Industry Alton Society Alton Town Council Alton Town Partnership Alton Western Bypass Action Group AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited Annetts Farm Applegarth Farm Shop Ashill Developments Association of Petersfield Businesses Aviation Tool Corporation Barratt Homes (Southampton) Barton Willmore Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council Bedales School, Bell Cornwell Partnership Bellway Homes Bentley Parish Council Bentworth Parish Council Bighton Parish Council Blackburne & Haynes Blackmoor Apple Shop Blackmoor Estates Ltd Blackmoor Game Ltd Blue Sky Planning Ltd BNP Paribas Real Estate Bonnington Architects Ltd Bordon Area Action Group Bordon Area Action Group Bovis Homes (SE Region) Bowtell's Farm Shop

Boyer Planning Boyes Turner Solicitors Bradbeer Planning Ltd Bradley Parish Meeting Bramdean & Hinton Ampner Parish Council Bramshott & Liphook Parish Council Bramshott & Liphook Preservation Soc British Telecommunications Plc Brocks Farm Shop Brookworth Homes Ltd Bryan Jezeph Consultancy Buriton Parish Council Business East Hants C J Butler Farms Ltd Calleva Medical Ltd Campaign for Real Ale (CAMRA) East Hampshire Campaign for Real Ale Ltd Candovers Parish Council Carter Jonas Catherington Village Residents' Assoc CB Richard Ellis Celab Limited CGMS Consulting Chawton Parish Council Chawton Parish Plan Committee Chawton Park Farm Chichester District Council Churt Parish Council Civil Aviation Authority Clarke Gammon Wellers Cluttons LLP Colliers CRE Community Action Hampshire Community First East Hampshire Community Response Compton Parish Council Connell Land & Planning Corrie & Co Ltd Country Landowners & Business Association Country Markets Countrywide CPRE (East Hants Branch) CPRE (Hampshire) Crest Nicholson Crondall Parish Council Crown Estates

Cyclists Touring Club Right to Ride D & M Planning Partnership Dalton Warner Davis LLP David Ames Associates David Wilson Homes Southern DCM (Tews) Ltd Deadwater Valley Trust Defence Estates - South West Denmead Parish Council DHA Planning & Development Dialogue Communicating Planning Dockenfield Parish Council Dr June Chatfield Drivers Jonas LLP DTZ Durleighmarsh Farm Shop East Hampshire Association of Parish and Town Councils East Hampshire Cyclists Forum East Hampshire Disability Forum East Hampshire District Council East Tisted Village Stores Eastleigh Borough Council Elstream Developments Energy Alton English Hampshire Lavender English Heritage (Southern Region) Entec UK Ltd Environment Agency Estate Office F. R. Northcott Farm Manager Farnham Town Council Farringdon Parish Council Fight4FourMarks fit2cook Foreman Homes Forestry Commission Forge Farm Format Milton Architects Ltd Four Marks Parish Council Frensham Parish Council Friends, Families, Travellers and Law Reform Project Froxfield Parish Council G L Hearn General Secretary Showmens Guild of Gt Britain Genesis Town Planning

Gladman Developments Goadsby & Harding (Commercial) Ltdb Gosport Borough Council Grange Farm Shop Grayshott Hall Health Centre Grayshott Pottery Grayshott Society GVA Grimley Ltd Hambledon Parish Council Hammer Trout Farm & Smokery Hampshire and Isle of Wight Wildlife Trust Hampshire Chamber of Commerce Hampshire Constabulary Hampshire Constabulary Property Services Hampshire County Council Hampshire County Youth Service Hampshire No 2 Circuit of Jehovah's Witnesses Hampshire Playing Fields Assc Hampshire Police Authority Hampshire Primary Care Trust Hansus Cottage Produce Hants Farming & Wildlife Advisory Group Hart District Council Harting Parish Council Haslemere Town Council Havant Borough Council Headley Down Community Association Headley Parish Council Henry Adams Planning Ltd Herriard Parish Council Hewetts Solicitors Highways Agency Hollywater Society Holybourne Residents Association Home Builders Federation Homes & Communities Agency Homes and Communities Agency (HCA) Horndean Business Group Horndean Parish Council Hotel Solutions Howard Hutton & Associates Hyden Farm Organics Ian Judd & Partners LLP J & K Walther J E Boyson & Son J G Luff

J Rook Manor Farm Ltd J S Evans Farm John R Nicholson Johnson Designs Kevin Scott Consultancy Kingsbridge Homes Kirkwells Knight Frank LLP Laleham Healthcare PLC Lambert Smith Hampton (NOMS) Leith Planning LEVVEL Linchmere Parish Council Lindford Parish Council Liss & Liphook Surgeries Liss Forest Residents Association Liss Parish Council Liss Village Design Group Long Sutton Parish Council Lucas Land and Planning Luken Beck Ltd M J Tosdevine & Son M L Wilson & Son Ltd Maltby Engineers Limited Martin Critchley Associates Martin Robeson Planning Practice Martineau Matthew Utting MB Planning & Prows Ltd McKenzie Brothers Medstead Parish Council Mill Farm Organic Milland Parish Council Ministry of Defence Mobile Operators Association (MOA) Mono Consultants Ltd Mr Richard Stubbs Mr Whitehead's Cider Company MV & VH Povey National Farmers Union National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups National Grid PLC National Landlord's Association National Trust Natural England Neame Sutton Ltd

Network Rail Property New Forest District Council NMB Planning Ltd North Hampshire CCG Northern Wey Trust Northington Parish Council Old Alresford Parish Council Old Thorns Golf and Country Estate Open Spaces Society P G Lambert & Son Paris Smith & Randall LLP Peacock & Smith Peak Quality Homes Peter Brett Associates Petersfield & District CAB Petersfield Area Historic Society Petersfield Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group Petersfield Society Petersfield Tomorrow Petersfield Tomorrow Town Design Statement Group Petersfield Town Council Phillips & Son Ltd Planning Potential Ltd PlanningSphere Ltd Pollen Organics Portsmouth City Council Portsmouth Water plc Preston Candover & Nutley Parish Council ProVision Planning & Design PRP Architects Pub With No Name PUSH Queen Elizabeth Country Park Radian Rail Regional Policy & Deliv Dept of Transport Rail Groupart Reed Farm Partnership Reside Developments Ltd Residents of Eastland Gate Richard Ashby Associates Robert Tutton Rogate Parish Council Roger Hill Architects Ropley Society Rother Valley Organics Rowlands Castle Association Rowlands Castle Parish Council

Rowledge Resdents' Association Royal Mail Estates RPS Planning RSPB Rushmoor Borough Council Rydon Homes S R Wittcomb S. W Budden Savills Scott Brownrigg & Turner Scottish & Southern Energy Selborne Brickworks Selborne Parish Council Selborne Village Shop Sheet Village Association Sigma Planning Services Simmons & Sons Smiths Gore Society of Sussex Downsmen Somerfield South Downs Gospel Hall Trust South Downs Joint Committee South Downs National Park Authority South Downs Society South East Hampshire CCG South East Water South Warnborough Parish Council South West Trains Southern Gas Networks (formerly Transco) Southern Planning Practice Southern Water Services Sovereign Kingfisher Sport England (SE Region) Stewart Ross Associates Stoughton Parish Council Strutt & Parker Surrey County Council Susan Organ Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land Telecom Securicor Cellular Radio (Cellnet) Terence O'Rourke Test Valley Borough Council TFA Ltd The Courtyard Community Village Shop The Environment Centre The Good Intent

The Petersfield School The Planning Bureau Ltd The Secretary Alton & District Sports Council The Selborne Arms The Theatres Trust The Waterlooville Trust Thomas Eggar LLP Tilford Parish Council Timms Turkeys Tourism South East Town and Country Planning Association Triple FFF Brewing Turley Associates Upton Grey Parish Council Urban DNA Vail Williams LLP W A Wood Waggoners Wells Residents Association Waverley Borough Council West Meon Parish Council West Sussex County Council West Waddy ADP Westella Weston Corbett & Weston Patrick Parish Meeting White Young Green Whitehill & Bordon Town Partnership Whitehill Town Council Winchester City Council Woolf Bond LLP Woolmer Service Station Ltd Worldham Parish Council

Appendix B – Letter to all consultees

Dear Sir/Madam,

The modifications on the Council’s Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations (Site Allocations Plan) are now out for public consultation. As part of the examination process, East Hampshire District Council has prepared a number of suggested changes to the plan, known as 'proposed modifications'.

These modifications fall into two types: 'minor modifications', which if implemented would not significantly change the meaning of the Site Allocations Plan and generally cover typographical errors or factual updates. However, the second type known as 'main modifications' are more substantial in that, for example, they would change the meaning of a policy or proposal in the plan. In addition to the 'main modifications' the Council produced a separate schedule of 'minor modifications'. However, these are for information only and do not form part of the consultation.

The Inspector asked that the schedule of 'main modifications' be subject to a six week period of consultation: this consultation runs from 23 November 2015 to 12 noon on 8 January 2016. The schedule of proposed main modifications can be found on the Councils website at http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/ehdc-local-plan- housing-and-employment-allocations-examination. The Inspector will consider all comments made on these main modifications prior to issuing his final recommendations in the form of an Inspector's Report.

Please note comments will only be considered that refer to a change as shown in the Schedule of Main Modifications.

Representations can be made by completing a response form and emailing to [email protected] or by writing to Planning Policy, East Hampshire District Council, Penns Place, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4EX.

Only those representations that are made in writing and are received by the Council within the six week period ending noon on Friday 8 January 2016 will be considered.

If you would like any more information on the Site Allocations Plan, its associated documents or the Local plan process then please contact the Planning Policy team on 01730 234280 or visiting the Council’s website at http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning- policy/local-plan-housing-and-employment-allocations-examination-library.

Yours Faithfully,

Victoria Potts Planning Policy Team Manager

Appendix C – Response form

East Hampshire District Council Housing and Employment Allocations Plan (Site Allocations Plan) For East Hampshire use Main Modifications consultation Respondent no: Representation 23 November 2015 – 8 January 2016 no:

Main Modifications Consultation Form

The East Hampshire District Housing and Employment Allocations Plan Schedule of Main Modifications (SASMM) includes a series of changes to the published Plan. These suggested changes are being consulted on for a period of six weeks. For advice on how to respond to the consultation, and how to fill in this form please see the guidance notes on the Council’s Housing and Employment Allocations Plan (Site Allocations Plan) website: http://www.easthants.gov.uk/planning-policy/local-plan

Submitting comments:

Please fill in this form and return:

 Via email to: [email protected]

 By posting to: Planning Policy Team

East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX

 Comments must be received by 12 noon on 8 January 2016. Comments received after this time will not be accepted and will not be considered by the Inspector.

 Please fill a separate form for each Main Modification you are commenting on.

 Please clearly identify which Main Modification your comments refer to using the reference (i.e. MM1, MM2 etc.) in the SASMM.

 Please do not repeat your previous comments as these have already been considered by the Planning Inspector. Comments will only be considered that refer to a change as shown in the SASMM.

 All comments received on the proposed changes within the time period will be considered by the Planning Inspector as part of the examination of the Site Allocations Plan. The Inspector may wish to contact you to discuss your comments and concerns, prior to concluding the formal examination into the Plan.

 The personal information will only be used for purposes related to the consultation and the Site Allocations Plan examination. The Council will place all the representations and the names of those who made them on its website, but will not publish personal information such as telephone numbers, emails or private addresses. However other information will be shared with the Planning Inspector.

 The information relating to your comments on the Main Modification (Part B) will be published on the Site Allocations Plan examination webpage.

A) Your details:

1) Who is making this representation?

Name: Organisation (if applicable): Address:

Email: Telephone:

Client’s details (only applicable if you are acting as agent on behalf of another person or business)

Name: Organisation (if applicable): Address:

Email: Telephone:

B) Your representations: What do you wish to object to/support? Please use a separate form for each Main Modification you wish to comment on. Only comments relating to a proposed Main Modification will be considered.

1) Please give the Main Modification reference your comment relates to.

Main Modification reference - MM:

2) Do you consider the proposed Main Modification addresses the following issues in relation to the policies concerned?

Yes No Legally compliant

Positively prepared

Justified

Effective

Consistent with national policy

3) If you have answered ‘no’ to any of the above please specify your reason for objecting below. You should make clear why the Main Modification is either not legally compliant and/or unsound having regard to whether the modification is not: positively prepared; justified; effective; or, not consistent with national policy. Please see guidance notes for explanation of these terms:

Continue on a separate sheet if necessary

4) Please set out what change(s) you consider necessary to make the East Hampshire Housing and Employment Main Modification legally compliant and/or sound. It will be helpful if you are able to put forward your suggested revised wording of any policy or text. Please be as precise as possible.

Continue on a separate sheet if necessary.

Please note you should cover all the information, evidence and supporting information necessary to justify the representation and the suggested change. After this stage, further submissions will only be accepted at the request of the Inspector.

You must return this form by 12 noon on Friday 8 January 2016.

You can e-mail it to: [email protected]

Or return by post to: Planning Policy, East Hampshire District Council Penns Place Petersfield Hampshire GU31 4EX

Appendix D – Deposit locations

Deposit Locations:

1. Planning Reception, Monday - Friday East Hampshire District Council, 09:00 am - 05:00 pm Penns Place, Petersfield, Hants GU31 4EX

2. Alton Information Office, Monday - Friday 7 Cross and Pillory Lane, 09:00 am - 04:30 pm Alton, Hants GU34 1HL. (Closed 01:00 pm - 01:30 pm) Saturdays 09.30 am - 12.00pm

3. Bordon Information Office Monday - Friday Forest Community Centre, 09:00 am - 04:45 pm Pinehill Road, Bordon, Hants (Closed 01:00 pm - 01:30 pm) GU35 0BS

4. Horndean Parish Office, Monday - Friday Tyfield House, 09:00 am - 04:30 pm Blendworth Lane, Horndean, Hants. PO8 0AA

5. Bramshott and Liphook Parish Monday - Friday Office, The Haskell Centre, 10:00 am - 04:00 pm Midhurst Road, Liphook, Hants. (Closed 01:00 pm - 02:00 pm) GU30 7TN

6. Local Libraries at Alton, Bordon, During normal opening hours Horndean, Liphook and Petersfield.

Appendix E

Response Modification Rep Made Agent/Organsiation Obo? Policy Summary of response number number HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 3 EMP1 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

Both originally included site specific clauses to improving bus stops and public transport and should be retained as it will guide applicant in preparing acceptable development proposals. Although the removal is justified by CP31, the suggested modification is not 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 4 EMP1 recommended and HCC does not agree with the Inspector as CP31 is a general policy and does not help developers in preparing acceptable development proposals for these two sites.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 11 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 11 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 12 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 12 EMP2 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause. Appendix E

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 12 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 13 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.

Both originally included site specific clauses to improving bus stops and public transport and should be retained as it will guide applicant in preparing acceptable development proposals. Although the removal is justified by CP31, the suggested modification is not 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 13 EMP2 recommended and HCC does not agree with the Inspector as CP31 is a general policy and does not help developers in preparing acceptable development proposals for these two sites.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 13 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 14 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 14 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 15 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 15 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 16 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified. Appendix E

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 16 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

An outline application was submitted on 27th Nov in the knowledge of the proposed modifications to policy ENP2 and make it more 3 Ian Sowerby Bell Cornwell Lamron Estates Ltd 17 EMP2 likley that the development will proceed in the short term. Our clients maintain their support for EMP2 as proposed to be modified.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of mineral resource. This site needs to be considered in this 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 17 EMP2 regard because both proposed employment allocations lie within the MWCA for the Alton HWRC and a safeguarded minerals and waste transfer station.

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 18 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 18 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 19 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS. Appendix E

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 19 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 20 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 20 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 21 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 21 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay. Appendix E

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 22 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 22 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 23 HN1 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 23 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 24 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 25 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay. Appendix E

By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected 15 Trevor Codlin 26 HN1 Trust species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corridors will be required".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 26 HN1 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation. This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 26 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification 11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 27 HN1 to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 27 HN1 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 27 HN1 MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay. Appendix E

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 28 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 28 HN1 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 28 HN1 MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 29 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS. Appendix E

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 29 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

This modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed and would weaken the protection HN1 affords to potential remains. 12 Martin Small Historic England 30 HN1 Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of....".

The modifications concern fundamental components of the scheme that have not been properly assessed and as a consequence are likely to lead to the inability of the site to deliver the level of development the Council is relying on. The 820 dwellings now proposed have not been properly tested in terms of its sustainability credentials. The Council have a proved need for specialist elderly accommodation pver and above its OAN. 40 sink holes on the site will restrict the ability to deliver the projected totals and to increase 14 David Neame Neame Sutton Southcott Homes (Fareham) Ltd 30 HN1 the housing densities elsewhere on the site has not been tested. The Council has failed to provide confirmation as to how the later phases of the site will be delivered in terms of highway and access requirements. The above points call into question the deliverability of the entire allocation of dwellings proposed during the plan period and its current 5YHLS.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 30 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

Council express overall agreement but wish to express 10 Gill Foster Horndean PC 31 HN1 disappointment with the deletion of paragraphs q + r. This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 31 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

Council express overall agreement but wish to express 10 Gill Foster Horndean PC 32 HN1 disappointment with the deletion of paragraphs q + r.

This site has the potential to impact upon the operational minerals and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of minerals resource and needs to be considered in this regard 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 32 HN1 because the proposed mixed used development site lies within the MWCA for oil and gas wellsites. The site also lies within a mineral resource area for Brick Making Clay.

Appears to be a modification of a landscaping criterion to refelct the 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 36 HN2 permission already granted in the policy. Appendix E

No definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision needs to be made for the on-going management and monitoring of key species. Suggested revision to wording "be Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 37 HN2 supported by a Biodiversity, Enhancement, Mitigation, Management Trust and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 37 HN2 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation. Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 38 HN2 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 39 HN2 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 41 LP1 The proposed wording is supported. The proposed amended wording regarding mitigation against 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 42 LP1 negative traffic impact is supported. HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for this site. The original wording requires developers to consider reducing 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 42 LP1 the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed wording is unhelpful and HCC recommend that the previous wording should be retained. The proposed amended wording regarding on-site movement is 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 43 LP1 supported. Appendix E

No definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision needs to be made for the on-going management and monitoring of key species. Suggested revision to wording "be Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 44 LP1 supported by a Biodiversity, Enhancement, Mitigation, Management Trust and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority species and habitats on the site".

The proposed amended wording regarding a Biodiversity 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 44 LP1 Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme is supported. The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 44 LP1 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation. Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per 15 Trevor Codlin 45 LP1 Trust Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".

Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional 17 Heather Richards RSPB 45 LP1 dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".

The proposed amended wording regarding mitigation against 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 45 LP1 adverse impact on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 is supported.

The removal of the reference to the FRA from this policy is 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 46 LP1 supported.

Want to reinstate (f) provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Incorporate measures to ensure new development is avoided in low lying areas and that there is adequate provision for sewerage. JCS (CP26) gives 9 Gina Spencer Bramshott & Liphook PC 46 LP1 no protection to property owners and the onus should be on the developer to ensure there is no detrimental effect on wider community. Emailed to advise no regard will be given to 'Amendments' and 'Add' sections within their response.

The removal of the reference to provide infrastructure for sewerage 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 47 LP1 (on and off site) from this policy is supported. Want to reinstate (f) provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Incorporate measures to ensure new development is avoided in low lying areas and that there is adequate provision for sewerage. JCS (CP26) gives 9 Gina Spencer Bramshott & Liphook PC 47 LP1 no protection to property owners and the onus should be on the developer to ensure there is no detrimental effect on wider community. Emailed to advise no regard will be given to 'Amendments' and 'Add' sections within their response.

The proposed amended wording regarding noise mitigation is 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 48 LP1 supported. The proposed amended wording regarding land contamination is 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 49 LP1 supported. The removal of the reference to an Energy Strategy is supported as 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 50 LP1 it is acknowledged that this requirement is covered in JCS Policy CP24. Appendix E

The removal of the reference to the provision of an Employment and Training Agreement is supported as it is acknowledged that this 20 Mandy Owen Boyer Easterton Ltd 51 LP1 is required through policy CP5 of the JCS.

Down Farm Development site access has been changed to Green Lane only and the reference to the Chalton Lane access has been 1 John and Anne Vincent 53 CF1 removed. Proposed wording "provide vehicular access to the site via Green Lane". HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 54 CF1 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

The words bowling green and been replaced by tennis courts. This does not reflect the planning permission for the allocation site but for the adjacent site. Proposed wording "provide public open space 1 John and Anne Vincent 56 CF1 to include allotments, tennis courts, sports pitches, a sports pavillion and children's play facilities".

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 57 CF1 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 58 CF1 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification 11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 59 CF1 to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development. Appendix E

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 59 CF1 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

This modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed and 12 Martin Small Historic England 60 CF1 would weaken the protection CF1 affords to potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 64 CF1 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

Is the removal of a landscaping criterion because it is considered to 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 67 CF2 be covered by JCS Policy CP29.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 68 CF2 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 74 CF3 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 74 CF3 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation. Appendix E

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 78 CF2 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 80 RC1 Seems to be a weakening of the existing policy condition. This modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of development on this site. It would also remove the helpful suggestion of early consultation with Historic England and HCC. The proposal is inadequate as it only requires any adverse impact to be 12 Martin Small Historic England 81 RC1 "mitigated". This would weaken the protection RC1 affords to heritage assets. The SA Addendum fails to to identify the full extent of the proposed changes but still concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the existing wording of criterion e of Policy RC1.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 82 RC1 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 82 RC1 example, no reference to mitigation.

We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these 17 Heather Richards RSPB 83 RC1 houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed. Appendix E

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 84 RC1 strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 85 RC1 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent 11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 86 RC1 with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 89 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 90 RC1 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause. Appendix E

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 90 RC1 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 91 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 92 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected 15 Trevor Codlin 93 RC2 Trust species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corridors will be required".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 93 RC2 example, no reference to mitigation.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 93 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 94 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these 17 Heather Richards RSPB 95 RC2 houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 95 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay. Appendix E

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 96 RC2 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 96 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

Concerned and disappointed that the agreed text in relation to these policies had been omitted which is needed because these sites are extremely vulnerbale to groundwater pollution. JCS policies C25 and C26 do not provide an appropriate level of protection for these sites. We request the following text is inserted " Development shall; Not result in any increased risk of pollution of the aquifier or public water supply (including turbidity). A surface water drainage strategy will be required to be submitted and approved to 18 Tracey Viney Portsmouth Water 97 RC2 demonstrate that drainage can and will be directed away from the aquifier, with appropriate pollution control and long-term maintenance measures in place" and "Ensure that risks to groundwater (including turbidity) from contamination are minimised through robust investiagtion, remediation and verification strategies".

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 97 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

New/improved sewerage sewerage infrastructure will be required to serve the proposed development to ensure the risk of foul water flooding does not increase. We consider the proposed modification to remove the requisite criteria a retrograde step and not consistent 11 Clare Gibbons Southern Water 98 RC2 with national policy. JCS CP26 is a general policy and does not accommodate this proposed development.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 98 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay. The proposed modification MM30 would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection that HN1 affords to 12 Martin Small Historic England 99 RC2 potential remains. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...". Appendix E

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 99 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 100 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay. This site has the potential to impact upon operational and waste facilities that have been safeguarded and/or safeguarded areas of 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 101 RC2 mineral resource. This site overlies an area safeguarded for Brick Manking Clay.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 103 RC2 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

By removing mention of the Bechstein's bat the species will not be fully protected. Suggested revision to wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Management and Monitoring Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Scheme and and include measures to protect priority/protected 15 Trevor Codlin 106 RC3 Trust species and habitats on the site. Specific measures for the protection of Bechstein's bat and the maintentance and management of supporting habitat/foraging corrifors will be required".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 106 RC3 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

We disagree with the modifications to remove commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy as appropriate mitigation for recreational in-combination impacts on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. These modifications raise concerns about the deliveray of these 17 Heather Richards RSPB 107 RC3 houses without the commitment to the Solent Mitigation Strategy to mitigation recreational distubance on the SPA. Maintain the current wording, do not utilise the text proposed. Appendix E

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 112 RC3 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to establish a record of the potential significance of the site. The reason for this 12 Martin Small Historic England 115 FM1 proposed modification is to reflect the planning permission granted for this site. Retain criterion e of Policy FM1.

We are disappointed that many elements of the plan we supported are proposed to be removed. We recognise that policies CP25 and CP26 of the JCS provide a solid direction in policy terms for 19 Laura Lax Environment Agency 117 FM1 development in relation to flood risk and water issues but we feel it is important to highlight where these issues need significant consideration. There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 123 FM2 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 128 FM3 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause. Appendix E

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully 12 Martin Small Historic England 132 FM3 managed. The reason for this proposed modification is to reflect the planning permission granted for this site. Retain criterion e of Policy FM3.

There is an inconsistency in the wording - on two different sites but covering the same problem. FM2 - provide improvements to 8 Roy Pullen Medstead PC 132 FM3 Boyneswood Road bridge. FM3 - provide a segregated footway across Boyneswood Road bridge.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 133 FM3 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 133 FM3 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 139 VL1 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of the development on this site. The proposed modification is inadequate as it only requires adverse impact to be mitigated and weaken the protection that policy VL1 affords to a nationally 12 Martin Small Historic England 142 VL1 important heritage asset. Reword as "provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the Bentworth Conservation Area and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into account and avoided or minimised within the proposals". Appendix E

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 143 VL1 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for an applicant to demonstrate through a heritage statement the impact of the development on this site. The proposed modification is inadequate as it only requires adverse impact to be mitigated. This would weaken the protection VL2 affords to nationally important heritage assets. Although both the existing criterion d and proposed new criterion e both refer to a Scheduled Ancient Monument, our 12 Martin Small Historic England 149 VL2 records do not show any such monuments on or near the allcation site at Crows Lane. Retain the wording "provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the setting of the nearby Upper Farringdon Conservation Area and demonstrate hwo any impact has been taken into account and avoided or minimised within the proposals".

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 150 VL2 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 150 VL2 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 154 VL3 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

The deletion of the sentence 'This should include measures to minimise the impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees and hedgerows within the site' has a specific significance not covered by the substituted text. It was not mentioned at the 2 Angela Jackson 156 VL3 Examination that these words would be cut out, vitial to preserve the character of the local area. I request that the deleted sentence be re-instated to say "the existing woodland, mature trees and hedegrows must be protected". Appendix E

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 156 VL3 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 156 VL3 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per 15 Trevor Codlin 157 VL3 Trust Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".

Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional 17 Heather Richards RSPB 157 VL3 dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 162 VL4 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 164 VL4 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 164 VL4 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per 15 Trevor Codlin 165 VL4 Trust Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA". Appendix E

Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional 17 Heather Richards RSPB 165 VL4 dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 170 VL5 problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 172 VL5 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 172 VL5 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL5 affords to 12 Martin Small Historic England 175 VL5 potential archaeological remains on the site. The SA Addendum concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...". HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 179 VL6 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 181 VL6 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site". Appendix E

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 181 VL6 example, no reference to mitigation.

Welcome the inclusion of this wording but suggest a revision to the wording to ensure that mitigation measures are robust and effective. Consider the best approach for protecting the Wealden Hampshire & IOW Wildlife Heaths Phase 2 SPA would be to adopt a strategic approach as per 15 Trevor Codlin 182 VL6 Trust Thames Basin Heaths SPA. Suggested revision of wording "provide robust and effective measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 SPA".

Proposed wording "provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects, through in-combination effects of additional 17 Heather Richards RSPB 182 VL6 dwellings on the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA to be set out in a strategic mitigation strategy".

It is the view of the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group that we do Medstead and Four Marks not think that this reworded criterion will address the adverse traffic 6 Nick Stenning Neighbourhood Plan Steering 186 VL7 impacts from development of this site. Group HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 186 VL7 problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 188 VL7 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 188 VL7 Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for example, no reference to mitigation.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 193 VL8 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause. Appendix E

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 196 VL8 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 196 VL8 example, no reference to mitigation.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 200 VL9 network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on Therethe public is no purse definition to subsequenlty of what constitutes resolve. Retaininga key species the ororiginal habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 202 VL9 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 207 VL10 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 209 VL10 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 209 VL10 example, no reference to mitigation.

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL10 affords to 12 Martin Small Historic England 211 VL10 potential archaeological remains on the site. Retain the wording " provide for the retention and careful management...". Appendix E

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 214 VL11 problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 216 VL11 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 216 VL11 example, no reference to mitigation.

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 220 VL12 problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause.

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, 15 Trevor Codlin 222 VL12 Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

HCC has some concerns with the new wording proposed for these site allocations. The previous wording requires developers to consider reducing the impact of all generated traffic on the local network. The proposed new wording is not acceptable to the Highway Authority as it would allow developers to ignore all traffic impacts except those that they considered significant and any traffic problems subsequently caused by development would then fall on 22 Pete Errington Hampshire County Council 227 VL13 the public purse to subsequenlty resolve. Retaining the original wording would accord more closely with guidance in the NPPF. HCC therefore recommends that the previous wording should be retained and also applied as the wording of clause b for site FM2 which originally had no traffic impact clause. Appendix E

There is no definition of what constitutes a key species or habitat and provision should be made for on-going management and monitoring of key species and habitats. Suggested revision to Hampshire & IOW Wildlife 15 Trevor Codlin 229 VL13 wording "be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement, Mitigation, Trust Management and Monitoring Scheme and include measures to protect priority/protected species and habitats on the site".

The modifications relating to these conditions requiring a Biodiversity and Mitigation Scheme are now weaker, with, for 21 Steve Ankers South Downs Society 229 VL13 example, no reference to mitigation.

The proposed modification would remove the requirement for important archaeological remains to be retained and carefully managed. This would weaken the protection Policy VL13 affords to 12 Martin Small Historic England 231 VL13 potential archaeological remains on the site. The SA Addendum concludes that this modification would have negative implications for heritage. Retain the wording "provide for the retention and careful management of...".

The proposed modifications were considered at our Planning Committee on 7th December & LPC comments that it welcomes the 4 R Bowery Liss Parish Council Support modifications.

The Planning and Transportation Committee Members agreed they 7 Pat Harris Alton Town Council Support had no comment to make.

We have reviewed these modifications and have no comments to Dorset, Hampshire & IOW make. 13 Dr Pauline Holmes Support Area Team for Natural England

We have reviewed the modifications and have no comment at this time 16 Patrick Blake Highways England Support

The NPA does not have any comments to make on the Main 23 Lucy Howard South Downs National Park Support Modifications. Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan An overall site area of 9.4ha is allocated to accommodate An overall site area of 9.4ha is allocated to accommodate about 7ha of employment land. The site will be developed in To make the policy development MM1 EMP1 14 about 7ha of employment land. The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria. specific. accordance with the following site specific criteria: Development shall: MM2 EMP1 a a 14 provision of vehicular priority access from Waterbrook Road; provide vehicular access to the site; Provides flexibility.

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM3 EMP1 b b 14 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; MM4 EMP1 c 14 consider improving access to public transport; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP31. include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM5 EMP1 d c 14 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public Clarification. network; Rights of Way network; provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of MM6 EMP1 e d 14 minimise the impact of development on the setting of Alton Consistency. development on the setting of Alton; and the surrounding area; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should MM7 EMP1 h 14 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; investigation of the extent and type of any contamination on MM8 EMP1 i 14 the site and identify any necessary mitigation measures DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP27. required; ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM9 EMP1 j 14 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM10 EMP1 k 14 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. An overall site area of 3.55ha is allocated to accommodate An overall site area of 3.55ha is allocated to accommodate about 3ha of employment land. The site will be developed in To make the policy development MM11 EMP2 16 about 3ha of employment land. The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria. specific. accordance with the following site specific criteria: Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM12 EMP2 b 16 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; MM13 EMP2 c 16 enhance the bus facilities on Wilsom Road; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP31. maintain the footpath through Lynch Hill and retain the rural MM14 EMP2 e 16 DELETE Covered by new criteria c. entrance to it; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should show that any loss of floodplain can be fully compensated. Details should also include a Surface Water Disposal Site specific issue and remainder MM15 EMP2 i g 16 fully compensate any loss of floodplain; Strategy. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the covered by JCS Policy CP25. run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM16 EMP2 j 16 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM17 EMP2 k 16 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. • a Care Village including independent living units and extra Clarification and reflecting MM18 HN1 • extra care provision for the elderly; care provision for older people planning application. Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan MM19 HN1 • a new 2FE primary school. • a new primary school and land for future expansion. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following To make the policy development MM20 HN1 site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: specific provision of community facilities, including a two form entry provide community facilities, including a primary school, MM21 HN1 c c 21 Consistency. primary school, community centre and convenience shop; community centre and convenience shop; provision of vehicular access to all residential and employment areas of the site, including access from provide vehicular access from Rowlands Castle Road to Rowlands Castle Road to serve land north of Site specific requirement to MM22 HN1 d d 21 serve land north of that road only and access from the B2149 Rowlands Castle Road and access from the B2149 (Havant reflect planning permission. (Havant Road) to serve the remainder of the site; Road) to serve land north-east and south-west of Havant Road; provision of measures to reduce the traffic impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads and improve accessibility by non-car transport modes including the ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM23 HN1 e e 21 provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to Clarification. the local and strategic road network; existing external routes including the Public Right of Way network and provision over the A3)M) Junction 2, and the ability to service the site by public transport;

provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential provision of new footpaths through the site to link with users, linked to existing external routes including the Public MM24 HN1 f f 21 Horndean Village, Hazleton Common and the South Downs Clarification and consistency. Right of Way network, Horndean Village, Hazleton Common National Park; and the South Downs National Park; include appropriate green infrastructure provision creating connections to the wider green infrastructure network, provide new green infrastructure to connect with the wider MM25 HN1 i i 21 including improving the habitat connectivity between the network, and to improve the habitat connectivity between the Clarification. adjoining SINCs (Redcroft Row, Hazelton Common, Pyle adjoining SINCs; Farm Meadow South and The Holt); implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to protect key be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM26 HN1 j j 21 species and habitats including Bechstein Bats, woodland and Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. mature trees on the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site; unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built development is avoided in low lying areas where surface Covered by JCS Policy CP25 and MM27 HN1 k 21 water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be DELETE by new criteria K. attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the site identified in order to protect the aquifer; demonstrate that any development will not result in not result in contamination of the aquifer or groundwater MM28 HN1 l k 21 contamination of groundwater as the site lies within Site specific issue. (including turbidity). groundwater source protection zone 1; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the site including any potential contamination from the adjacent ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through MM29 HN1 o m 21 Clarification. historic landfill sites, to identify any necessary mitigation remediation works; and measures required; provide for the retention and careful management of any MM30 HN1 p n 21 important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification. site, in a manner appropriate to their significance;

ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM31 HN1 q 21 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM32 HN1 r 21 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. Land at Lovedean Lane is allocated for residential Land at Lovedean Lane is allocated for residential development for about 40 dwellings on 2.5ha. development for about 40 dwellings on 2.5ha. To make the policy development MM33 HN2 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM34 HN2 b b 22 Clarification impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network;

include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public MM35 HN2 c c 22 Clarification and consistency. network including retention of and connection to the public Rights of Way network and the public footpath along the footpath along the northern edge of the site; northern edge of the site; respond positively to the sensitive rural landscape character provide semi-natural open space along the western boundary MM36 HN2 d d 22 to the western boundary and strengthen the green To reflect planning permission and strengthen links to the wider green infrastructure network; infrastructure connections linking the wider area; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM37 HN2 e e 22 impact of development on protected trees, including veteran Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. tree and woodland and hedgerows. Where adverse impacts habitats on site; and are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and off site drainage works and measures to prevent surface Covered by JCS Policy CP25 and MM38 HN2 f 22 water from the site discharging onto the adjacent highway. DELETE by new criteria f. The site should attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the site identified in order to protect the aquifer; demonstrate that any development will not result in not result in contamination of the aquifer or groundwater MM39 HN2 g f 22 contamination of groundwater as the site lies within Site specific issue. (including turbidity). groundwater source protection zone 1; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM40 HN2 h 22 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

Land at Lowsley Farm, south of the A3 is allocated for Land at Lowsley Farm, south of the A3 is allocated for residential development for about 175 dwellings on 10.8ha. residential development for about 175 dwellings on 10.8ha. To make the policy development MM41 LP1 24 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM42 LP1 b b 24 impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads Clarification the local road network including Longmoor Road; and Longmoor Road; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public MM43 LP1 c c 24 Clarification. network and retain the public right of way in an attractive semi- Rights of Way network and retain its attractive semi-natural natural setting; setting; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to protect key species along the southern boundary and habitats on site be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation including protected trees, including veteran tree and MM44 LP1 d d 24 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. woodland. Where adverse impacts are unavoidable, habitats on site; appropriate mitigation will be required. Any biodiversity enhancements should take account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area; provision of a Screening Assessment as the site is within 5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could potentially provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse have a significant impact on the ecological integrity of the MM45 LP1 e e 24 effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection Clarification. SPA. The Assessment should ascertain whether the Area. provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM46 LP1 f 24 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM47 LP1 g 24 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures including provide noise mitigation measures including noise bunds and MM48 LP1 h f 24 Clarification. noise bunds and barriers, to reduce traffic noise from A3(M); barriers, to reduce traffic noise from the A3(M); and

investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through MM49 LP1 i g 24 Clarification. site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required; remediation works. ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM50 LP1 j 24 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM51 LP1 k 24 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. Land at Down Farm is allocated for residential development Land at Down Farm is allocated for residential development for about 207 dwellings on 17.8ha. for about 207 dwellings on 17.8ha. To make the policy development MM52 CF1 28 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM54 CF1 b b 28 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network;

include measures to improve accessibility by non-car modes, the ability to service the site by public transport and ensuring provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM55 CF1 c c 28 the connection of the site with existing cycle and pedestrian users, linked to existing external routes including the existing Consistency. routes including connection to the existing cycle route running cycle route running alongside the A3; alongside the A3 and the Public Right of Way network; be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM57 CF1 f f 28 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. Scheme; habitats on site; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built development is avoided in low lying areas where surface Covered by JCS Policies CP25 MM58 CF1 g 28 water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be DELETE and CP26. attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the site identified in order to protect the aquifer; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM59 CF1 h 28 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); provide for the retention and careful management of any MM60 CF1 j h 28 important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification. site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM61 CF1 k 28 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM62 CF1 l 28 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. Land at Drift Road is allocated for residential development for Land at Drift Road is allocated for residential development for about 11 dwellings on 0.6ha. about 11 dwellings on 0.6ha. To make the policy development MM63 CF2 30 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: provision of vehicular access to the site via a new access link provide vehicular access to the site via Drift Road in the MM64 CF2 a a 30 forming a priority junction with Drift Road in the location of the Consistency. location of the existing driveway; existing driveway; implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM65 CF2 b b 30 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM66 CF2 c c 30 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; and network; MM67 CF2 d 30 provision of appropriate landscaping; DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP29. be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM68 CF2 e d 30 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. Scheme; habitats on site; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site MM69 CF2 f 30 should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM70 CF2 g 30 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at Trafalgar Rise is allocated for residential Land at Trafalgar Rise is allocated for residential development for about 18 dwellings on 0.7ha. development for about 18 dwellings on 0.7ha. To make the policy development MM71 CF3 31 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM72 CF3 b b 31 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM73 CF3 c c 31 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public Clarification. network; Rights of Way network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to protect key be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM74 CF3 e e 31 species and habitats that use the site. Where adverse Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be habitats on site. required; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should MM75 CF3 f 31 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM76 CF3 g 31 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift is Land at former Rowlands Castle Brickworks, The Drift is allocated for residential development for about 34 dwellings allocated for residential development for about 34 dwellings To make the policy development MM77 RC1 32 on 1.8ha. on 1.8ha. specific. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM78 RC1 b b 32 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network;

include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM79 RC1 c c 32 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public Clarification. network and to the National Cycle Route 22; Rights of Way network and the National Cycle Route 22;

retain and screen the bridleway within a semi-natural setting. MM80 RC1 d d 32 Any residual loss of amenity is to be compensated for by retain and screen the bridleway within a semi-natural setting. Clarification. improvements to the right of way network in the local area; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) of Rowland’s Castle and the setting of the Conservation Area mitigate any adverse impact on the Scheduled Ancient MM81 RC1 e e 32 and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into Monument of Rowlands Castle and the setting of the Clarification. account and avoided or minimised within the proposals. Early Conservation Area; consultation with English Heritage and Hampshire County Council’s archaeology adviser would be advised; Implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to protect key be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation species and habitats including Bechstein Bats, protected MM82 RC1 f f 32 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. trees, including veteran tree and woodland. Where adverse habitats; impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional MM83 RC1 g g 32 Clarification. additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs), sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy; Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites; and

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and surface water flooding including avoiding built development in Covered by JCS Policies CP25 MM84 RC1 h 32 low lying areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure DELETE and CP26. that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the site in order to protect the aquifer; demonstrate that any development will not result in MM85 RC1 i 32 contamination of groundwater as the site lies within DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. groundwater source protection zone 1; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM86 RC1 j 32 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the ensure risks from land contamination are minimised, through MM87 RC1 k h 32 site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required; remediation works. and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM88 RC1 l 32 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land south of Oaklands is allocated for residential Land south of Oaklands is allocated for residential development for about 106 dwellings on 5.5ha. development for about 106 dwellings on 5.5ha. To make the policy development MM89 RC2 34 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM90 RC2 b b 34 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public MM91 RC2 c c 34 network including access at both Redhill Road and the B2148 Clarification. Rights of Way network, Redhill Road, the B2148 and Cycle and to the existing bridleway and Cycle Route 22 located to Route 22; the east of the site; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan improve the pedestrian footway and provide crossing facilities provide crossing facilities on the B2148 Whichers Gate Road MM92 RC2 d d 34 Clarification. on the B2148 Whichers Gate Road; and improve the pedestrian footway; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme which should include a plan to manage, maintain and enhance the adjacent Oaklands Woodland SINC’s be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation ecological integrity and interest. The Scheme should also Scheme and include measures to protect key species and MM93 RC2 e e 34 Clarification. include measures to protect key species and habitats habitats on site whilst managing, maintaining and enhancing including Bechstein Bats, hedgerows and mature trees. the adjacent Oaklands Woodland SINC's; and Where adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of a network of green infrastructure that integrates MM94 RC2 f 34 all existing trees (whether protected or not) with other DELETE Covered by new criteria e. vegetation on the site and its boundaries; provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional MM95 RC2 g f 34 Clarification. additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs), sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy; Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites.

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and surface water including avoiding built development in low lying Covered by JCS Policies CP25 MM96 RC2 h 34 areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure that the DELETE and CP26. run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place. Water should also be directed away from the most sensitive areas of the site identified in order to protect the aquifer; demonstrate that any development will not result in MM97 RC2 i 34 contamination of groundwater as the site lies within DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. groundwater source protection zone 1; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM98 RC2 j 34 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); provide for the retention and careful management of any MM99 RC2 k 34 important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the DELETE To reflect planning permission. site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM100 RC2 l 34 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM101 RC2 m 34 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. Land north of Bartons Road (Eastleigh House Cottages), Land north of Bartons Road (Eastleigh House Cottages), Havant is allocated for residential development for about 17 Havant is allocated for residential development for about 17 dwellings on 0.6ha as an extension of proposed housing dwellings on 0.6ha, as an extension of proposed housing To make the policy development MM102 RC3 36 development in Havant Borough to the south. development in Havant Borough. specific. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall:

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM103 RC3 b b 36 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to existing external routes including the Public Right of Way provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM104 RC3 c c 36 network and provide a new pedestrian footpath along Bartons Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; Road to connect the site to Wakefords Way West and improvements to the pedestrian crossing on Bartons Road; retain the existing Armco vehicle barrier which protects the Vehicle barrier located outside of MM105 RC3 d 36 DELETE railway embankment; District. implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include the provision of an adequate be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation wooded buffer to the adjoining SINC and measures to protect Scheme and measures to protect key species and habitats on MM106 RC3 e d 36 Clarification. key species and habitats including Bechstein Bats. Where site, whilst providing an adequate wooded buffer to the adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will adjoining SINC; be required; provision of appropriate mitigation to address the impacts of provide mitigation to address the impacts of recreational recreational disturbance through in-combination effects of disturbance, through in-combination effects of additional MM107 RC3 f e 36 Clarification. additional dwellings on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar dwellings, on the Solent Special Protection Areas (SPAs), sites as set out in the Solent Mitigation Strategy; Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) and Ramsar sites; and

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, including a Surface Water Disposal Strategy, to address any measures required to mitigate any potential impacts of groundwater and MM108 RC3 g 36 surface water including avoiding built development in low lying DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. areas. The site should also be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; demonstrate that any development will not result in MM109 RC3 h 36 contamination of groundwater as the site lies within DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. groundwater source protection zone 1; and developers should work with the District Council to ensure MM110 RC3 j 36 that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied unless it DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so. Land at Lymington Farm is allocated for residential Land at Lymington Farm is allocated for residential development for about 107 dwellings on 3.8ha. development for about 107 dwellings on 3.8ha. To make the policy development MM111 FM1 38 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM112 FM1 b b 38 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; provide an assessment of the traffic implications at the nearby To reflect the planning MM113 FM1 c 38 DELETE railway bridge; permission. include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM114 FM1 d c 38 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to To reflect the planning MM115 FM1 e 38 establish a record of potential archaeological significance of DELETE permission. the site; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and off site drainage works and include measures to prevent provide measures to prevent surface water from the site To reflect the planning MM116 FM1 g e 38 surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent discharging onto the adjacent highway; permission. highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run- off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM117 FM1 h f 38 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM118 FM1 j 38 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM119 FM1 k 38 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. Land at Friars Oak Farm in Medstead is allocated for Land at Friars Oak Farm in Medstead is allocated for residential development for about 79 dwellings on 3.9ha. residential development for about 79 dwellings on 3.9ha. To make the policy development MM120 FM2 40 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM121 FM2 b Consistency. the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM122 FM2 c d 40 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public Consistency. network; Rights of Way network; be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM123 FM2 d e 40 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Consistency. Scheme; habitats on site. provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and off site drainage works and include measures to prevent provide measures to prevent surface water from the site To reflect the planning MM124 FM2 e f 40 surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent discharging onto the adjacent highway. permission. highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run- off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; developers should work with the District Council to ensure MM125 FM2 f 40 that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied unless it DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so; and provision of a local Employment and Training Agreement prior MM126 FM2 g 40 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP5. to the implementation of development. Land North of Boyneswood Lane is allocated for residential Land North of Boyneswood Lane is allocated for residential development for about 51 dwellings on 3.64ha. development for about 51 dwellings on 3.64ha. To make the policy development MM127 FM3 41 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM128 FM3 b b 41 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining roads; the local road network; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

improvement works to Boyneswood Lane, Boyneswood Lane between its junction with footway provision on site and its improve the highway between Boyneswood Lane and Stoney MM129 FM3 c c 41 junction with Stoney Lane, and to Stoney Lane between its Clarification. Lane; junction with Boyneswood Lane and its junction with Station Approach (unless suitable alternatives can be provided);

provide a segregated footway across Boyneswood Road MM131 FM4 e Clarification and consistency. bridge; the implementation of a programme of archaeological work to establish a record of potential archaeological significance of To reflect the planning MM132 FM3 e 41 DELETE the site; and to identify any necessary mitigation measures permission. required; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard any be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation protected species that use the site, minimise the impact of MM133 FM3 f 41 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. development on protected trees, including veteran tree and habitats on site; woodland and hedgerows. Where adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Foul and Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to address on and off site drainage works and include measures to prevent provide measures to prevent surface water from the site To reflect the planning MM134 FM3 h 41 surface water from the site discharging onto the adjacent discharging onto the adjacent highway; and permission. highway. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run- off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage, MM135 FM3 i 41 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. water supply and electricity (on and off site); investigation of the extent and type of contamination on the To reflect the planning MM136 FM3 j 41 DELETE site to identify any necessary mitigation measures required; permission. ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM137 FM3 l 41 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at Ashley Road in Bentworth is allocated for residential Land at Ashley Road in Bentworth is allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings on 1.27ha. development for about 12 dwellings on 1.27ha. To make the policy development MM138 VL1 44 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall:

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM139 VL1 b b 44 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM140 VL1 c c 44 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan have a design and layout of high quality and a character MM141 VL1 d d 44 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the mitigate any adverse impact on Bentworth Conservation Area; MM142 VL1 e e 44 Clarification. development on the nearby Bentworth Conservation Area; and implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM143 VL1 f f 44 Scheme. Any biodiversity enhancements should take Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area; habitats on site. provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM144 VL1 g 44 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM145 VL1 h 44 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM146 VL1 i 44 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at Crows Lane in Upper Farringdon is allocated for Land at Crows Lane in Upper Farringdon is allocated for residential development for about 8 dwellings on 0.6ha. residential development for about 8 dwellings on 0.6ha. To make the policy development MM147 VL2 46 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM148 VL2 b c 46 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; provision of a heritage statement to assess the impact of the development on the Scheduled Ancient Monument (SAM) and mitigate any adverse impact on the Scheduled Ancient MM149 VL2 d e 46 the setting of the nearby Upper Farringdon Conservation Area Monument and the setting of the Upper Farringdon Clarification. and demonstrate how any impact has been taken into Conservation Area; account and avoided or minimised within the proposals;

implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM150 VL2 f g 46 impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site. unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM151 VL2 g 46 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM152 VL2 h 46 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan Land at Headley Nurseries in Headley is allocated for Land at Headley Nurseries in Headley is allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.4ha. residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.4ha. To make the policy development MM153 VL3 48 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM154 VL3 b b 48 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM155 VL3 c c 48 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM156 VL3 e e 48 and hedgerows within the site. Measures to protect key Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. species and habitats should also be carried out. Where habitats on site; and adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within 5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity MM157 VL3 f f 48 effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection Clarification. of the SPA. The Screening Assessment should ascertain Area. whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required;

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM158 VL3 g 48 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM159 VL3 h 48 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at Headley Fields is allocated for residential Land at Headley Fields is allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on 0.97ha. development for about 7 dwellings on 0.97ha. To make the policy development MM160 VL4 50 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall:

provision of vehicular access to the site from The Paddock provide vehicular access to the site from The Paddock and To reflect the planning MM161 VL4 a a 50 and improvement made to the standard of Headley Fields to include improvements to the standard of Headley Fields; permission. ensure that the link is suitable for use by all modes;

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM162 VL4 b b 50 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM163 VL4 c c 50 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public Clarification. network; Rights of Way network; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation protected species that use the site and minimise the impact of MM164 VL4 e e 50 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. development on the mature trees and hedgerow on the habitats on site; and boundary of the site. Where adverse impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within 5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse potentially have a significant impact of the ecological integrity MM165 VL4 f f 50 effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection Clarification. of the SPA. The Screening Assessment should ascertain Area. whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required;

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. This site should MM166 VL4 g 50 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM167 VL4 h 50 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land adjacent to Linden, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is Land adjacent to Linden, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings To make the policy development MM168 VL5 52 on 0.74ha. on 0.74ha. specific. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: provision of a priority junction access and ensure any new MM169 VL5 a a 52 direct access does not encroach on the visibility requirements provide vehicular access without direct access onto the A325; Consistency. of adjoining junctions in regular use; implementation of appropriate measures to reduce the traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM170 VL5 b b 52 Clarification impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network including the A325; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM171 VL5 c c 52 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM172 VL5 f f 52 impact of development on of existing woodland, mature trees Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site; unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within 5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity MM173 VL5 h 52 DELETE To correct a factual error. of the SPA. A Screening Assessment is therefore required to ascertain whether the provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that built MM174 VL5 i 52 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE water flooding is more likely to occur and the site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;

provide for the retention and careful management of any MM175 VL5 k i 52 important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the manage important archaeological remains within the site. Consistency. site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM176 VL5 l 52 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land adjacent to Stream Cottage, Fullers Road in Holt Pound Land adjacent to Stream Cottage, Fullers Road in Holt Pound is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings To make the policy development MM177 VL6 54 on 0.2ha. on 0.2ha. specific. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: provision of vehicular access to the site via Fullers Road; MM178 VL6 a a implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic Provide vehicular access to the site via Fullers Road. Consistency. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM179 VL6 b 54 Clarification. the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM180 VL6 b c 54 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Consistency. users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM181 VL6 d e 54 impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Consistency. and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site; and unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of a Screening Assessment as the site lies within 5km of the Wealden Heaths Phase II SPA and could provide adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse potentially have a significant impact on the ecological integrity MM182 VL6 e f 54 effects on the Wealden Heaths Phase 2 Special Protection Consistency. of the SPA. The Assessment should ascertain whether the Area. provision of adequate measures to avoid or mitigate any adverse effects is required; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM183 VL6 f g 54 development is avoided in Flood Zone 3 and low lying areas. DELETE Covered by National Policy The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM184 VL6 g 54 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan Land to the rear of Junipers in Medstead is allocated for Land to the rear of Junipers in Medstead is allocated for residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.8ha. residential development for about 12 dwellings on 0.8ha. To make the policy development MM185 VL7 56 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM186 VL7 b b 56 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM187 VL7 c c 56 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM188 VL7 e e 56 and hedgerows within the site. Measures to protect key Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification species and habitats should be carried out. Where adverse habitats on site; and impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM189 VL7 f 56 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM190 VL7 g 56 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM191 VL7 i 56 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land to the east of Cedar Stables in Medstead is allocated for Land to the east of Cedar Stables in Medstead is allocated for residential development for about 10 dwellings on 1.3ha. residential development for about 10 dwellings on 1.3ha. To make the policy development MM192 VL8 58 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall:

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM193 VL8 b b 58 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM194 VL8 c c 58 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; the area of land to the north east of the site (west of Trinity provide an area of open space to the north east of the site, MM195 VL8 e e 58 Clarification. Hill) is to be retained as open space; west of Trinity Hill; and implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM196 VL8 f f 58 impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site. unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM197 VL8 g 58 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM198 VL8 h 58 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land north of Towngate Farm House in Medstead is allocated Land north of Towngate Farm House in Medstead is allocated for residential development for about 4 dwellings on 0.5ha. for residential development for about 4 dwellings on 0.5ha. To make the policy development MM199 VL9 59 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall:

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM200 VL9 b b 59 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM201 VL9 c c 59 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; and network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM202 VL9 e e 59 Scheme. This should include measures to retain the Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. hedgerows bordering the site; habitats on site. provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. The site should MM203 VL9 f 59 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MM204 VL9 g 59 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM205 VL9 h 59 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at adjacent to Bullfinches, Park Lane in Ropley is Land at adjacent to Bullfinches, Park Lane in Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on allocated for residential development for about 7 dwellings on To make the policy development MM206 VL10 60 0.8ha. 0.8ha. specific. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM207 VL10 b b 60 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM208 VL10 c c 60 existing external routes Including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM209 VL10 e e 60 impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site; and unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM210 VL10 f 60 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;

provide for the retention and careful management of any MM211 VL10 g f 60 important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the manage important archaeological remains within the site. Clarification. site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM212 VL10 h 60 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land at the corner of Dunsells Land and Gilbert Street in Land at the corner of Dunsells Land and Gilbert Street in Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 15 Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 15 To make the policy development MM213 VL11 61 dwellings on 0.69ha. dwellings on 0.69ha. specific. The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM214 VL11 b b 61 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM215 VL11 c c 61 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM216 VL11 e e 61 impact of development on existing woodland, mature trees Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. and hedgerows within the site. Where adverse impacts are habitats on site. unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM217 VL11 f 61 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM218 VL11 g 61 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land off Hale Close in Ropley is allocated for residential Land off Hale Close in Ropley is allocated for residential development for about 5 dwellings on 0.2ha. development for about 5 dwellings on 0.2ha. To make the policy development MM219 VL12 62 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall: implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM220 VL12 b b 62 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; Appendix F

Existing New Page number Main Mod paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM221 VL12 c c 62 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation MM222 VL12 e e 62 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. Scheme; habitats on site; and provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM223 VL12 f 62 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur. The site should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place; MM224 VL12 g f 62 relocation of the existing allotments; re-provide existing allotments within the village. Site specific requirement. ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM225 VL12 h 62 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Land southwest of Dean Cottage is allocated for residential Land southwest of Dean Cottage is allocated for residential development for about 15 dwellings on 0.95ha. development for about 15 dwellings on 0.95ha. To make the policy development MM226 VL13 63 The site will be developed in accordance with the following The site will be developed in accordance with the following specific. site specific criteria: site specific criteria. Development shall:

implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MM227 VL13 b b 63 Clarification. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; the local road network; include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential MM228 VL13 d d 63 existing external routes including the Public Right of Way Clarification. users, linked to existing external routes; network; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to minimise the be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation impact of development on mature trees (some TPOs) forming MM229 VL13 f f 63 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. part of existing hedgerows bordering the site. Where adverse habitats on site; and impacts are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; provision of a detailed Flood Risk Assessment, which should include a Surface Water Disposal Strategy. Potential measures should be incorporated to ensure that any built MM230 VL13 g 63 development is avoided in low lying areas where surface DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP25. water flooding is more likely to occur. The shite should be attenuated to ensure that the run-off rate is no greater than the run-off prior to development taking place;

provide for the retention and careful management of any MM231 VL13 h g 63 important archaeological remains, within and adjacent to the manage important archaeological remains within the site. Consistency. site, in a manner appropriate to their significance; and ensure that the principles of the Energy Strategy are applied MM232 VL13 i 63 unless it can be proven unfeasible or unviable to do so, DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP24. working with the District Council. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

Further clarification and update to take account of status of MIN1 Sub heading Sub heading 3 What is this about? What is the Housing and Employment Allocations Plan? document and reflect matters discussed at Examination.

This is a consultation on the Proposed Submission version of The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Further clarification and update the Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations for East Employment Allocations is the second part in a suite of to take account of status of MIN2 1.1 1.1 3 Hampshire District (areas outside the South Downs National development plan documents and follows on from the Joint document and reflect matters Park (SDNP)). Core Strategy. discussed at Examination. Proposed Submission means that this is the version of the Its primary purpose is to identify specific sites to meet the Further clarification and update Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations that the individual housing and employment targets set out in policies to take account of status of MIN3 1.2 1.2 3 Council would like to submit to the Secretary of State for CP3 and CP10 of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and to set document and reflect matters examination. The purpose of the consultation is to obtain out guidance for the development of these sites. discussed at Examination. views on the “soundness” of the plan. Throughout the process of preparing the Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations, a significant level of public consultation has been undertaken. In order to inform communities of the ongoing planning situation in East Hampshire District, the Council undertook preliminary This Plan uses the same overall housing requirement, community engagement on the housing and employment site Further clarification and update methodology (‘Liverpool’) and buffer (5%) as the JCS. These options covering the whole area outside the SDNP as part of to take account of status of MIN4 1.3 1.3 3 have been found sound both at the Examination of the JCS the draft Plan. A commentary of the events has been document and reflect matters and at the Examination of the Housing and Employment produced into Local Interim Planning Statements (LIPS). The discussed at Examination. Allocations Plan. LIPS events kicked off the plan process and stimulated significant community interest. Consultation on the draft Plan took place between December 2014 and February 2015, comments received during this time have also helped to develop the Plan.

The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and This process has ensured that the community, partners and Employment Allocations only covers the area of East stakeholders have had the opportunity to influence key Hampshire outside the South Downs National Park (SDNP) Further clarification and update aspects of the Plan. This has been guided by the adopted as shown in Map 1. This is because the Park Authority is the to take account of status of MIN5 1.4 1.4 3 Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) and a summary Local Planning Authority for the SDNP and is producing a document and reflect matters of the steps undertaken is set out in the Statement of separate Local Plan for the whole of the SDNP. For all discussed at Examination. Consultation which is published alongside the Plan. information about planning in the National Park please see the SDNP website http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan The purpose of this stage of consultation is to provide an opportunity for you to comment on the matters that will be considered by an Inspector who conducts the examination, i.e. whether the plan: a) has been prepared in accordance with the Duty to Cooperate, legal and procedural requirements, and b) is “sound‟. Soundness means: · Positively prepared – the plan should be prepared based on a strategy which seeks to meet objectively assessed development and infrastructure requirements, including unmet requirements from neighbouring authorities where it is reasonable to do so and consistent with achieving This means taking a disaggregated approach to the supply of Further clarification and update sustainable development; new homes and employment in each Planning Authority to take account of status of MIN6 1.5 1.5 3 · Justified – the plan should allocate the most appropriate Area, including the calculation of the 5 year housing land document and reflect matters sites, when considered against the reasonable alternatives, supply. discussed at Examination. based on proportionate evidence; · Effective – the plan should be deliverable over its period and based on effective joint working on cross-boundary strategic priorities; and • Consistent with national policy – the plan should enable the delivery of sustainable development in accordance with the policies in the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework). (Source: paragraph 182 National Planning Policy Framework, DCLG 2012).

In preparing the Plan, the Council believes it has complied with all the necessary legal requirements. In terms of the Duty to Cooperate, the Council has worked with neighbouring It should be noted that Whitehill & Bordon, and areas covered Further clarification and update authorities and has produced a statement of compliance. The by emerging Neighbourhood Plans which allocate homes, do to take account of status of MIN7 1.6 1.6 4 statement provides evidence of how the council has co- not form part of this Plan. Further information is set out in document and reflect matters operated with neighbouring authorities and “bodies‟ on later sections. discussed at Examination. potential cross-boundary issues. The council also believes that the Plan meets the tests of soundness set out above.

Further clarification and update to take account of status of MIN8 Sub heading Sub heading 4 What is the Housing and Employment Allocations Plan? delete document and reflect matters discussed at Examination. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

The East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations will form part of the Statutory Development Plan for East Hampshire District. Its primary purpose is to identify specific sites to meet the individual Further clarification and update For the remainder of this document the East Hampshire housing and employment targets set out in policies CP3 and to take account of status of MIN9 1.7 1.7 4 District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Allocations will CP10 of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS), and to set out document and reflect matters be called the Site Allocations Plan. guidance for the development of these sites. It should be discussed at Examination. noted that Whitehill & Bordon and areas covered be emerging Neighbourhood Plans do not form part of this Plan. Further information is set out in later sections.

Upon adoption it will form part of the Development Plan which The Site Allocations Plan forms part of the Development will comprise the following: Plan, which will comprise the following: • Saved Policies of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: • Saved Policies of the East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review (March 2006) Second Review (March 2006) • East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy • East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy Further clarification and update (adopted by East Hampshire District Council (May 2014) and (adopted by East Hampshire District Council (May 2014) and to take account of status of MIN10 1.8 1.8 4 South Downs National Park Authority (June 2014)) South Downs National Park Authority (June 2014)) document and reflect matters • East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and • East Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and discussed at Examination. Employment Allocations Employment Allocations • Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (October 2013) • Hampshire Minerals and Waste Plan (October 2013) • Adopted Neighbourhood Plans • Adopted Neighbourhood Plans

Housing and employment site allocations are currently the Housing and employment site allocations are currently the main priority in the planning system and that is why this Plan main priority in the planning system and that is why this plan focuses on these issues. In the future another part of the focuses on these issues. In the future another part of the Further clarification and update Local Plan that updates the Saved Policies of the East Local Plan that updates the Saved Policies of the East to take account of status of MIN11 1.9 1.9 4 Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review will be created Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review will be created document and reflect matters and form part of the Statutory Development Plan. This will and form part of the Statutory Development Plan. This will discussed at Examination. consider further revisions to Settlement Policy Boundaries, consider further revisions to Settlement Policy Boundaries, Gaps between settlements, Special Character Areas and Gaps between settlements, Special Character Areas and other Development Management Policies. other Development Management Policies.

For the remainder of this document this version of the East Whilst the National Park is a separate authority, East Further clarification and update Hampshire District Local Plan: Housing and Employment Hampshire District Council has regard to the statutory to take account of status of MIN12 1.10 1.10 5 Allocations will be called the Proposed Submission Site purposes of the National Park under Section 62 of the document and reflect matters Allocations Plan. Environment Act 1995. discussed at Examination.

It must be noted that the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan only covers the area of East Hampshire outside the South Downs National Park (SDNP) as shown in Further clarification and update Map 1. Within the SDNP the Park Authority is the Local to take account of status of MIN13 1.11 5 DELETE Planning Authority and will be producing a separate Local document and reflect matters Plan for the whole of the South Downs National Park. For all discussed at Examination. information about planning in the National Park please see their website http://www.southdowns.gov.uk/planning. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

Further clarification and update East Hampshire District Council is however, to have regard to to take account of status of MIN14 1.12 5 the statutory purposes of the National Park under Section 62 DELETE document and reflect matters of the Environment Act 1995. discussed at Examination.

Neighbourhood planning is a new element of the planning system introduced in 2012 through the Localism Act. A fundamental principle of neighbourhood planning is that it is community-led, with the community establishing local MIN15 1.13 1.11 7 NO CHANGE planning policies for development and use of land within its neighbourhood. Neighbourhood Plans enable local people to play a leading role in responding to the needs and priorities of the local community.

In East Hampshire District, the appropriate bodies for producing Neighbourhood Plans are the Town and Parish Councils. A Neighbourhood Plan must generally conform to the East Hampshire District Local Plan and can promote MIN16 1.14 1.12 7 more but not less development than the Local Plan. Once a NO CHANGE Neighbourhood Plan is adopted it will become part of the Development Plan for the district and will be used to assess and determine planning applications within the Neighbourhood Plan’s designated area.

In East Hampshire; Alton, Bentley, and Medstead and Four In East Hampshire: Alton, Bentley, Ropley and Medstead & Marks are the three areas currently designated as Four Marks are the four areas currently designated as Further clarification and update Neighbourhood Plan areas. Where a community is Neighbourhood Plan areas. Where a community is to take account of status of MIN17 1.15 1.13 7 developing a Neighbourhood Plan that includes housing and developing a Neighbourhood Plan that includes housing and document and reflect matters employment allocations and has progressed to consultation employment allocations and has progressed to consultation discussed at Examination. stage, the District Council is not proposing to allocate sites. stage, the District Council is not proposing to allocate sites.

However, if these Neighbourhood Plans do not become MIN18 1.16 1.14 7 adopted the Council will assess the need for it to identify sites NO CHANGE through a subsequent Development Plan Document (DPD). If further Neighbourhood Plans are prepared in the future and include site allocations for housing and/or employment and/or MIN19 1.17 1.15 7 alterations to the Settlement Policy Boundaries, these NO CHANGE neighbourhood plans will supersede this Plan for their respective designated areas. Further clarification and update to take account of status of MIN20 Sub heading What should I look at? DELETE document and reflect matters discussed at Examination.

This document includes detailed site allocations and policies Further clarification and update to guide and manage development, deliver infrastructure and to take account of status of MIN21 1.18 7 DELETE create sustainable communities. These also set out how the document and reflect matters plan will be implemented and monitored. discussed at Examination. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

Further clarification and update A Policies Map accompanies the Plan which sets out on an to take account of status of MIN22 1.19 7 Ordnance Survey map base, where development is proposed DELETE document and reflect matters and changes to existing Settlement Policy Boundaries. discussed at Examination.

Alongside the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan there is a Sustainability Appraisal report which explains the Further clarification and update alternatives that were considered for the sites, and the to take account of status of MIN23 1.20 7 DELETE reasons for the choices made. There is also a Habitats document and reflect matters Regulations Assessment, which looks at the impacts of the discussed at Examination. Plan on sites of European nature conservation importance. The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan also reflects the comprehensive evidence base which has been prepared and updated to justify the Plan. This covers issues such as Further clarification and update housing land, employment land, flooding, transport, to take account of status of MIN24 1.21 8 DELETE infrastructure and viability and has been compiled primarily document and reflect matters either by the council or on behalf of the council by specialist discussed at Examination. consultants, in conjunction with our partners and statutory bodies. Further clarification and update You can see the Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan to take account of status of MIN25 1.22 8 and all related documents on our web site at: DELETE document and reflect matters www.easthants.gov.uk/draftsiteallocations discussed at Examination.

Further clarification and update to take account of status of MIN26 Sub heading 8 How can I get involved? DELETE document and reflect matters discussed at Examination.

You can contact us directly as an individual, through being Further clarification and update part of a group such as a residents association or other to take account of status of MIN27 1.23 8 DELETE community or special interest group, or through your parish document and reflect matters council. discussed at Examination. This can be done by: (i) using the on-line version of this document and linked Further clarification and update response form OR to take account of status of MIN28 1.24 8 (ii) by picking up, filling in and returning one of the response DELETE document and reflect matters forms, available from the Council’s website, the Council discussed at Examination. offices and deposit locations.

Further clarification and update to take account of status of MIN29 Sub heading 8 What happens next? DELETE document and reflect matters discussed at Examination. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

Figure 1 sets out the stages to the Plan. This current consultation is highlighted. Following consultation the Council cannot make major changes to the Plan if it intends to submit it for examination. We will therefore endeavour to resolve objections through minor changes if necessary, but will then submit the Plan, the schedule of changes and any Further clarification and update outstanding representations to the Secretary of State (SoS). to take account of status of MIN30 1.25 8 DELETE The SoS appoints an independent Inspector to conduct an document and reflect matters examination into the soundness of the plan and the Inspector discussed at Examination. determines what will be discussed at the examination, and who should attend. Figure 1: Illustrates the formal stages the plan is taken through to adoption in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (England) Regulations 2012. Further clarification and update to take account of status of MIN31 Sub heading Sub heading 9 The East Hampshire Context The East Hampshire Context document and reflect matters discussed at Examination. The JCS sets out the Council's overall approach towards the local application of sustainable development through its objectives and core policies. The JCS was jointly prepared by East Hampshire District Council (EHDC) and the South Downs National Park Authority (SDNPA). The National Park covers 57% of the district and splits the area managed by East Hampshire District Council into two halves, one south of MIN32 1.26 1.16 9 NO CHANGE the National Park known as the southern parishes and an area to the north of the National Park. The splitting of the district into two separate Local Planning Authorities creates some added complexity for place shaping for example the main settlements of Petersfield and Liss are both part of East Hampshire as a place but in planning terms are dealt with independently by the SDNPA.

The JCS is the overarching planning policy document for the The JCS is the overarching planning policy document for the district. It sets out the strategy for the future development of district. It sets out the strategy for the future development of the district over the period to 2028 and was prepared and the district over the period to 2028 and was prepared and examined as complying with the requirements of the examined as complying with the requirements of the Framework. The JCS identifies the overall spatial vision and Framework. The JCS identifies the overall spatial vision and economic, social and environmental objectives for the district economic, social and environmental objectives for the district Further clarification and update and the amount, type and broad location of development and the amount, type and broad location of development to take account of status of MIN33 1.27 1.17 10 needed to fulfil those objectives. The Proposed Submission needed to fulfil those objectives. The Site Allocations Plan document and reflect matters Site Allocations Plan identifies and allocates specific sites identifies and allocates specific sites suitable for development discussed at Examination. suitable for development in order to meet the JCS's in order to meet the JCS's requirements for housing and requirements for housing and employment and in so doing employment, and in so doing makes a major contribution to makes a major contribution to delivering the objectives within delivering the objectives within the JCS. The Site Allocations the JCS. The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan Plan covers the same plan period as the JCS for the 43% of covers the same plan period as the JCS for the 43% of the the district outside the South Downs National Park. district outside the South Downs National Park. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan sets out what The Site Allocations Plan sets out what type and level of type and level of development will be promoted throughout development will be promoted throughout East Hampshire East Hampshire District Council’s planning area. The Plan District Council’s planning area. The Plan will provide more Further clarification and update will provide more certainty for local communities, landowners, certainty for local communities, landowners, developers and to take account of status of MIN34 1.28 1.18 10 developers and infrastructure providers about the future infrastructure providers about the future pattern of document and reflect matters pattern of development. Specific development proposals for development. Specific development proposals for the sites discussed at Examination. the sites identified in the Plan will, however, need to gain identified in the Plan will, however, need to gain planning planning permission before development can take place. permission before development can take place.

Within the area to the north of the National Park is Whitehill & Within the area to the north of the National Park is Whitehill & Bordon, the second largest town in the district and currently a Bordon, the second largest town in the district and currently a base for the military who are in the process of relocating. It is base for the military who are in the process of relocating. It is Further clarification and update identified in the JCS as a strategic allocation for 2,725 identified in the JCS as a strategic allocation for 2,725 to take account of status of MIN35 1.29 1.19 10 dwellings over the Plan period to 2028. The strategic dwellings over the Plan period to 2028. The strategic document and reflect matters allocation does not form part of this Proposed Submission allocation does not form part of this Site Allocations Plan and discussed at Examination. Site Allocations Plan and is proceeding on the basis of policy is proceeding on the basis of policy guidance provided in the guidance provided in the JCS and through a masterplan and JCS, and through a masterplan and a series of planning a series of planning applications. applications. Other significant settlements to the north of the National Park identified in the JCS include Alton, Liphook, Four MIN36 1.30 1.2 10 NO CHANGE Marks/South Medstead and Grayshott, each providing a range of facilities for their local populations. The area to the south of the National Park has three MIN37 1.31 1.21 10 significant settlements, Horndean, Clanfield and Rowlands NO CHANGE Castle.

The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan directly takes The Site Allocations Plan directly takes forward Policy CP3: forward Policy CP3: New Employment Provision and Policy New Employment Provision and Policy CP10: Spatial CP10: Spatial Strategy for Housing in the Local Plan: Joint Strategy for Housing in the Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy Core Strategy (JCS). Policy CP10 of the JCS sets an overall (JCS). Policy CP10 of the JCS sets an overall target of target of 10,060 new homes to be built over the plan period 10,060 new homes to be built over the plan period (up to (up to 2028). The majority of that target is accounted for in 2028). The majority of that target is accounted for in Further clarification and update completions, existing planning permissions, existing completions, existing planning permissions, existing to take account of status of MIN38 1.32 1.22 10 undeveloped allocations from previous plans, the strategic undeveloped allocations from previous plans, the strategic document and reflect matters allocation at Whitehill & Bordon, and from estimates of allocation at Whitehill & Bordon, and from estimates of discussed at Examination. development on small sites (windfalls). The Proposed development on small sites (windfalls). The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan is focused on identifying Submission Site Allocations Plan is focused on identifying specific greenfield sites to meet the residual housing specific greenfield sites to meet the residual housing requirement and takes into consideration sites that have been requirement and takes into consideration sites that have been granted planning permission since the adoption of the JCS. granted planning permission since the adoption of the JCS. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan Policy CP10 of the JCS requires allocations to be made to meet the following levels of housing in East Hampshire District (outside the National Park): • a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton • a minimum of 700 dwellings at Horndean; • a minimum of 200 dwellings at Clanfield; MIN39 1.33 1.23 11 NO CHANGE • a minimum of 175 dwellings at both Liphook and Four Marks/South Medstead; • a minimum of 150 dwellings at Rowlands Castle; • a minimum of 150 dwellings at other villages north of the National Park.

The use of ‘minimum’ targets does not mean that there is no Housing need was established through the JCS Examination ceiling to the housing targets. The Inspector’s report into the at around 610 dwellings per annum, or 10,370 dwellings for JCS was clear that, whilst the 10,060 new homes target for the whole of the plan period up to 2028. The figure of 10,060 the whole of the district over the plan period was the was set by the JCS as the minimum number of new houses MIN40 1.34 1.24 11 Clarification. minimum needed to meet the objectively assessed need, the that should be provided to 2028. The difference between the figure of 10,370 would meet all the need. Therefore a two indicates the need for a modest degree of flexibility relatively small degree of flexibility is needed around the above the minimum figure set by the JCS, and this is housing targets and is provided for within this Plan. provided for by this Plan.

The housing land supply for the district as a whole is made up of a minimum of 8,366 dwellings outside the SDNP and a MIN41 1.35 1.25 11 minimum of 1,694 dwellings within the SDNP making a total NO CHANGE of 10,060. Chapter 10 sets out more information about the implementation and monitoring. The table below shows the number of dwellings being The table below shows the number of dwellings being provided (outside the SDNP) in relation to the targets provided (outside the SDNP) in relation to the targets established in the JCS. The provision consists of planning established in the JCS. The provision consists of planning Further clarification and update permissions granted outside of the Settlement Policy permissions granted outside of the Settlement Policy to take account of status of MIN42 1.36 1.26 11 Boundaries since 1st April 2013, allocated sites within this Boundaries since 1st April 2013, allocated sites within this document and reflect matters document, as well as sites allocated through emerging document, as well as sites allocated through emerging discussed at Examination. Neighbourhood Plans. Details on the complete housing land Neighbourhood Plans. Details on the complete housing land supply position (1st October 2014) can be found within supply position (1st April 2015) can be found within Appendix Appendix 2. 2. MIN43 Table 1 Table 1 11 Update figures to reflect additional commitments To reflect the latest position Employment provision and distribution in the district is set out in Policy CP3 of the JCS which requires the provision of land for employment use in East Hampshire district (outside the National Park) for: MIN44 1.37 1.27 12 NO CHANGE • about 7ha of employment land in Alton; • about 2ha of land in Horndean for industrial (B2) and business use (B1).

Further clarification and update The Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan contains The Site Allocations Plan contains specific site policies to to take account of status of MIN45 1.38 1.28 12 specific site policies to meet these requirements. meet these requirements. document and reflect matters discussed at Examination. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan It should be noted that some of the site allocations have MIN46 1.39 1.29 12 already been granted planning permission. Further detail is NO CHANGE set out in appendix 1. Policy CP22 and paragraph 7.24 of the JCS requires housing proposals capable of affecting the Wealden Heaths Phase II Special Protection Area to consider, on a case-by-case basis, whether a project-specific HRA is required. Housing proposals falling within 5.6km of the coastal ‘Natura 2000’ MIN47 1.30 12 sites will need to consider whether mitigation is required to Clarification address the impacts of recreational disturbance, through in- combination effects of additional dwellings, on the Solent SPAs, SACs and Ramsar sites. Affected housing allocations in this plan have a site specific criterion to address these constraints.

Relevant national policies, JCS policies and the saved MIN48 1.40 1.31 12 policies of the Local Plan Second Review (2006) will apply NO CHANGE where relevant to all of the proposals set out in this Plan.

The following sections set out, for each of the main towns The following sections set out, for each of the main towns and villages in the Plan area, site specific proposals to meet and villages in the Plan area, site specific proposals to meet the requirements of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS). The the requirements of the Joint Core Strategy (JCS). The Site Proposed Submission Site Allocations Plan focuses on Allocations Plan focuses on identifying specific sites to meet identifying specific sites to meet the individual housing and the individual housing and employment targets set out in employment targets set out in policies CP3 and CP10 of the policies CP3 and CP10 of the JCS. These specific site Further clarification and update JCS. These specific site allocations meet the residual allocations meet the residual development requirements for to take account of status of MIN49 2.1 12 development requirements for the district (outside the SDNP). the district (outside the SDNP). For each site there is a policy document and reflect matters For each site there is a policy setting out the criteria that setting out the criteria that subsequent planning applications discussed at Examination. subsequent planning applications will need to address. The will need to address. The boundaries of allocated sites, which boundaries of allocated sites, which are all greenfield sites are all greenfield sites beyond existing Settlement Policy beyond existing Settlement Policy Boundaries, will be Boundaries, will be integrated into a revised Settlement integrated into a revised Settlement Policy Boundary when Policy Boundary when the Plan is adopted and are shown on the Plan is adopted and are shown on the Policies Map. the Policies Map.

The preparation of the first Neighbourhood Plans in the The preparation of the first Neighbourhood Plans in the district cover Alton, Bentley, Ropley and Medstead & Four district cover Alton and Bentley. Work has been undertaken Marks. Work has been undertaken in parallel with this Plan. in parallel with this Plan. In order to allow the local community In order to allow the local community the widest opportunity to the widest opportunity to determine local policies for their Further clarification and update determine local policies for their area, land allocations and area, land allocations and policy guidance in this Plan is only to take account of status of MIN50 2.4 13 policy guidance in this Plan is only provided for those provided for those elements not covered by the respective document and reflect matters elements not covered by the respective Neighbourhood Neighbourhood Plans. Should further Neighbourhood Plans discussed at Examination. Plans. Should further Neighbourhood Plans be prepared in be prepared in the future and include site allocations for the future and include site allocations for housing and/or housing and/or employment, these neighbourhood plans will employment, these neighbourhood plans will supersede this supersede this Plan for their respective designated areas. Plan for their respective designated areas. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

The Joint Core Strategy (CP10) states that new sites will be identified for a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton. The site The Joint Core Strategy (CP10) states that new sites will be identification and allocation process will be addressed as part Further clarification and update identified for a minimum of 700 dwellings at Alton. The site of the emerging Alton Neighbourhood Plan. It should be to take account of status of MIN51 3.1 13 identification and allocation process will be addressed as part noted that the Alton Neighbourhood Plan Area covers the document and reflect matters of the emerging Alton Neighbourhood Plan. village of Holybourne and therefore any housing allocations discussed at Examination. for this village will be considered through the preparation of the Alton Neighbourhood Plan. provision of a buffer zone along the river to protect and provide a buffer zone along the River Wey to protect and MIN52 EMP1 f e 14 enhance the biodiversity value and prevent further erosion of enhance the biodiversity value and prevent further erosion of Consistency. the river and its corridor; the river and its corridor; and implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation to be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Scheme. This should include measures to protect key MIN53 EMP1 g f 14 Mitigation Scheme and include measures to protect key Clarification. species and habitats. Where adverse impacts are species and habitats on site. unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required; MIN54 EMP2 a 16 provision of vehicular access from Wilsom Road; provide vehicular access from Wilsom Road; Consistency. include provision of internal walking and cycle routes linked to provide an on-site movement layout suitable for all potential existing external routes including the Public Right of Way users, linked to existing external routes including the Public MIN55 EMP2 d c 16 Clarification. network and retain the Public Right of Way in attractive semi- Rights of Way network and retain its attractive semi-natural natural setting; setting; provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of MIN56 EMP2 f d 16 minimise the impact of development on the setting of Alton Consistency. development on the setting of Alton; and the neighbouring residential area; provision of a buffer zone between the bank of the river and provide a buffer zone between the bank of the River Wey and any buildings to protect and enhance the biodiversity value of any buildings, to protect and enhance the biodiversity value of MIN57 EMP2 g e 16 Clarification and locally specific. the river corridor and to ensure that access is available for the river corridor and to ensure that access is available for any future maintenance; any future maintenance; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. Any biodiversity enhancements should take MIN58 EMP2 h f 16 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. account of the Biodiversity Opportunity Area and protected habitats on site; and key species and habitats; HN1 - Provision 700 new dwellings HN1 - Provision 700 new dwellings Care Village including independent living units 2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1) MIN59 4.4 4.4 19 2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1) Clarification and consistency. New school New school

A site of 62ha of land to the east of Horndean is allocated for MIN60 HN1 NO CHANGE a mixed use form of development to include: MIN61 HN1 • about 700 dwellings; NO CHANGE • land for about 2ha industrial (B2) and business use (B1); MIN62 HN1 NO CHANGE and provision of accommodation for the elderly, including extra provide accommodation for older people, including extra MIN63 HN1 a a 21 Clarification. care; care; provision of about 2ha of land for industrial (B2) and business provide about 2ha of land for industrial (B2) and business MIN64 HN1 b b 21 uses (B1) and provision of an Enterprise Centre, close to uses (B1) and provide an Enterprise Centre, close to Junction Consistency. Junction 2 of the A3(M) with immediate access off the B2149; 2 of the A3(M) with immediate access off the B2149; Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan provision of a new pedestrian crossing on Dell Piece East to provide a new pedestrian crossing on Dell Piece East to connect to the existing footway and provide a safe and connect to the existing footway, and provide a safe and MIN65 HN1 g g 21 Consistency. accessible link to existing facilities on the western side of accessible link to existing facilities on the western side of Junction 2 of the A3(M); Junction 2 of the A3(M); provision of appropriate landscaping and screening to provide landscaping and screening to minimise the impact of minimise the impact of development on the setting of the development on the setting of the South Downs National Park MIN66 HN1 h h 21 Consistency. South Downs National Park and of the Grade II Listed and on the setting of the Grade II Listed Buildings at Pyle Buildings at Pyle Farm; Farm; ensure adequate infrastructure is provided for sewerage (on MIN67 HN1 m 21 DELETE Covered by JCS Policy CP26. and off site); provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures including provide noise mitigation measures including noise bunds and MIN68 HN1 n l 21 noise bunds and barriers, to reduce traffic noise from Havant barriers, to reduce traffic noise from Havant Road and the Consistency Road and A3(M); A3(M); MIN69 HN2 a a 22 provide a vehicular access to the site from Lovedean Lane; NO CHANGE provision of vehicular access to the site from Longmoor Road via Lowsley Farm reserve housing site listed in the saved provide vehicular access to the site from Longmoor Road via Site specific and to future proof MIN70 LP1 a a 24 East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Review Policy Lowsley Farm Phase 1; the document. H2; retention of hedgerows along with appropriate landscaping retain hedgerows and provide landscape enhancements to and landscape enhancement to take account of the impact of MIN71 CF1 e e 28 take account of its proximity to the South Downs National Clarification. development and its proximity to the South Downs National Park; Park; implement a scheme for protecting future occupiers from provide noise mitigation to reduce traffic noise from Chalton MIN72 CF1 i g 28 traffic noise from the A3(M) and Chalton Lane to mitigate the Clarification. Lane and the A3(M); and impacts of traffic noise from surrounding roads;

MIN73 CF3 a a 31 provision of vehicular access to the site via Trafalgar Rise; provide vehicular access to the site via Trafalgar Rise; Consistency. provision of any mitigation measures required to protect, provide mitigation measures to retain, protect and enhance MIN74 CF3 d d 31 retain and enhance the western and northern landscape Clarification. the western and northern landscape boundaries; and boundaries; provision of vehicular access to the site via the access road provide vehicular access to the site via the access road to the MIN75 RC1 a a 32 Consistency. to the north of the site from Redhill Road; north of the site from Redhill Road; provision of vehicular access to the site via Redhill Road or provide vehicular access to the site via Redhill Road or MIN76 RC2 a a 34 Consistency. Whichers Gate Road; Whichers Gate Road; provision of vehicular access to the site via a single access provide vehicular access to the site via a single access on to MIN77 RC3 a a 36 Consistency. on to Bartons Road (in Havant Borough); Bartons Road (in Havant Borough); provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures to protect provide noise mitigation measures to protect the occupants of MIN78 RC3 i f 36 Consistency. the occupants of dwellings located close to the railway line; dwellings located close to the railway line. provision of vehicular access from Lymington Bottom Road provide vehicular access from Lymington Bottom Road MIN79 FM1 a a 38 designed to minimise the impact on the adjacent Doctors designed to minimise the impact of the adjacent Doctors Consistency. surgery; surgery; implement a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation be supported by a Biodiversity Enhancement and Mitigation Scheme. This should include measures to safeguard MIN80 FM1 f d 38 Scheme and include measures to protect key species and Clarification. protected species that use the site. Where adverse impacts habitats on site; and are unavoidable, appropriate mitigation will be required;

provision of appropriate noise mitigation measures to protect provide noise mitigation measures to protect the occupants of MIN81 FM1 i f 38 Clarification. the occupants of dwellings located close to the railway line; dwellings located close to the railway line. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan

provision of vehicular access to the site from Boyneswood provide vehicular access to the site from Boyneswood Road MIN82 FM2 a a 40 Consistency. Road as well as the closure of access via Friars Oak; as well as the closure of access via Friars Oak; MIN83 FM2 b c 40 improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge; provide improvements to Boyneswood Road bridge; Consistency. provision of vehicular access from the corner of Boyneswood provide vehicular access from the corner of Boyneswood MIN84 FM3 a a 41 Consistency. Lane/Beechlands Road; Lane/Beechlands Road; provision of public open space on site and retention of the provide on-site open space and retain the existing boundary MIN85 FM3 g h 41 Consistency existing boundary vegetation; vegetation; provision of increased capacity at the Four Marks CofE provide increased capacity at the Four Marks CofE Primary To reflect the planning MIN86 FM3 k i 41 Primary School to accommodate the likely number of primary School to accommodate the likely number of primary school permission. school children arising from the development; and children arising from the development. provision of vehicular access from Church Street or Ashley MIN87 VL1 a a 44 provide vehicular access from Church Street or Ashley Road; Consistency. Road and incorporate junction radii; provision of vehicular access to the site via Crows Lane; MIN88 VL2 a a 46 implementation of appropriate measures to reduce traffic provide vehicular access to the site via Crows Lane; Consistency. impacts of the development on adjoining residential roads; ensure any significant negative traffic impact is mitigated on MIN89 b Consistency. the local road network; have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN90 VL2 c d 46 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; appropriate landscaping and landscape enhancement to take provide landscaping and landscape enhancement to take MIN91 VL2 e f 46 account of the impact of development and its proximity to the account of its proximity to the South Downs National Park; Consistency. South Downs National Park; and MIN92 VL3 a a 48 provision of vehicular access to the site via Glayshers Hill; provide vehicular access to the site via Glayshers Hill; Consistency. have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN93 VL3 d d 48 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN94 VL4 d d 50 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; provide a pedestrian crossing on the A325 on the desire line MIN95 VL5 d d 52 NO CHANGE between the site and the northbound bus stop; have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN96 VL5 e e 52 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; provision of appropriate landscaping and landscape provide landscaping and landscape enhancement to take MIN97 VL5 g g 52 enhancement to take account of the impact of development account of the impact of development and its proximity to the Consistency. and its proximity to the South Downs National Park; South Downs National Park; provision of a noise assessment due to close proximity to provide noise mitigation measures to reduce traffic noise from MIN98 VL5 j h 52 Consistency. A325; the A325; and have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN99 VL6 c d 54 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; provision of vehicular access to the site via Junipers on South provide vehicular access to the site via Junipers on South MIN100 VL7 a a 56 Consistency. Town Road; Town Road;

have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN101 VL7 d d 56 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village;

safeguarding of an element of the site to provide an safeguard an element of the site to provide an extension to MIN102 VL7 h f 56 Consistency. extension to the cemetery; and the cemetery. Appendix G

Existing New Page number Minor paragraph/ paragraph/ of Proposed Policy Current wording Proposed wording Reason Mod no. Policy Policy Submission Criterion Criterion Plan MIN103 VL8 a a 58 provision of vehicular access to the site via Trinity Hill; provide vehicular access to the site via Trinity Hill; Consistency. have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN104 VL8 d d 58 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; provision of vehicular access to the site from one access on provide vehicular access to the site from one access on to MIN105 VL9 a a 59 Consistency. to Wield Road leading to a service road; Wield Road leading to a service road; have a design and layout of high quality and a character have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN106 VL9 d d 59 Consistency. which respects the characteristics of the village; which respects the characteristics of the village; and MIN107 VL10 a a 60 provision of vehicular access to the site via Park Lane; provide vehicular access to the site via Park Lane; Consistency. have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN108 VL10 d d 60 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; MIN109 VL11 a a 61 provision of vehicular access to the site via Dunsells Lane; provide vehicular access to the site via Dunsells Lane; Consistency. have a design and layout of high quality and a character have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN110 VL11 d d 61 Consistency. which respects the characteristics of the village; which respects the characteristics of the village; and MIN111 VL12 a a 62 provision of vehicular access to the site via Hale Close; provide vehicular access to the site via Hale Close; Consistency. have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN112 VL12 d d 62 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; MIN113 VL13 a a 63 provision of vehicular access to the site from Bighton Hill; provide vehicular access to the site from Bighton Hill; Consistency. MIN114 VL13 c c 63 provision of passing places and footpath on Bighton Hill; provide passing places and a footpath on Bighton Hill; Consistency. have a design and layout of high quality and a character MIN115 VL13 e e 63 NO CHANGE which respects the characteristics of the village; MIN116 Appendix 1 Update to reflect latest position Update to reflect the Housing Land supply position as of 1 MIN117 Appendix 2 April 2015 Update to reflect the most recent housing trajectory and MIN118 Appendix 3 correct key and explanation. MIN119 Map 1 Update title to reflect status of document