DOCSLIB.ORG

Perspectives on Science and Culture Comparative Cultural Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Perspectives on Science and Culture Comparative Cultural Studies Ari Ofengenden, Series Editor The series examines how cultural practices, especially contemporary creative media, both shape and themselves are shaped by current global developments such as the digitization of culture, virtual reality, global interconnectedness, increased people flows, transhumanism, environmental degradation, and new forms of subjectivi- ties. We aim to publish manuscripts that cross disciplines and national borders in order to provide deep insights into these issues. Perspectives on Science and Culture Edited by Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert Purdue University Press West Lafayette, Indiana Copyright 2018 by Purdue University. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Cataloging-in-Publication data is on file at the Library of Congress. Paperback ISBN: 978-1-55753-797-3 ePDF ISBN: 978-1-61249-521-7 ePUB ISBN: 978-1-61249-522-4 An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high-quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-1-55753-821-5. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www .knowledgeunlatched.org. Cover image: “The man who measures the clouds” by Jan Fabre / Copyright: Angelos bvba / Photo: Elisabeth Soetaert Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction Perspectives on Science and Culture ix Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert Part 1: Narrative and Rhetorical Perspectives 1 Chapter 1 Experiencing Nature through Cable Television 3 David J. Tietge Chapter 2 Steven Pinker and the Scientific Sublime: How a New Category of Experience Transformed Popular Science 19 Alan G. Gross Chapter 3 Architectonic Discourses and Their Extremisms 39 Barry Brummett Chapter 4 Science and the Idea of Culture 53 Richard van Oort Chapter 5 A Rhetorical Analysis of the Two Cultures in Literary Fiction 67 Ronald Soetaert and Kris Rutten Chapter 6 The Missing Link and Human Origins: Understanding an Evolutionary Icon 89 Peter C. Kjærgaard Part 2: Cognitive Perspectives 107 Chapter 7 Suspicion toward Science and the Role of Automatic Intuitions about Origins 109 Elisa Järnefelt Chapter 8 Bridging the Gap: From Intuitive to Scientific Reasoning — The Case of Evolution 131 E. Margaret Evans Chapter 9 Missing Links: How Cladograms Reify Common Evolutionary Misconceptions 149 Andrew Shtulman Chapter 10 Representations of the Origin of Species in Secular (France) and Religious (Morocco) Contexts 171 Dominique Guillo Part 3: Epistemological Perspectives 193 Chapter 11 Updating Evolutionary Epistemology 195 Christophe Heintz Chapter 12 Intuitions in Science Education and the Public Understanding of Science 223 Stefaan Blancke, Koen B. Tanghe, and Johan Braeckman Chapter 13 Vindicating Science — By Bringing It Down 243 Maarten Boudry and Massimo Pigliucci Part 4: Thematic Bibliography 259 Thematic Bibliography of Publications on Different Perspectives on Science and Culture 261 Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert Index 271 Acknowledgments We thank Purdue University Press for its interest in our work and support to publish Perspectives on Science & Culture, and Steven Tötösy de Zepetnek, for- mer series editor, for his encouragement to pursue this project. We also thank the anonymous reviewers of the manuscript for their valuable comments. Stefaan Blancke acknowledges the financial support of Ghent University (BOF13/24J/089) and the Flemish Fund for Scientific Research (FWO, project number G001013N). Finally, we would like to thank the authors for their valu- able contributions. vii Introduction Perspectives on Science and Culture Kris Rutten, Stefaan Blancke, and Ronald Soetaert This edited volume in the Comparative Cultural Studies Series explores the intersection between scientific understanding and cultural representation from an interdisciplinary perspective. The contributions in this volume analyze pop- ular representations of science and scientific discourse from the perspectives of rhetorical criticism, comparative cultural studies, narratology, educational stud- ies, discourse analysis, the cognitive sciences, and naturalized and evolutionary epistemology. As such, the volume fits within the theoretical and methodolog- ical framework of comparative cultural studies as a contextual approach to the study of culture from an interdisciplinary perspective. The main objective of this volume is to explore how particular cognitive predispositions and cultural representations both shape and distort the public debate about scientific con- troversies, the teaching and learning of science, and the development of science itself. Theoretically, this volume will integrate, on the one hand, C. P. Snow’s concept of the two cultures (science versus the humanities) and Jerome Bruner’s confrontation between narrative and logico-scientific modes of thinking and, on the other hand, cognitive and epistemological approaches to human cognition and culture, including science. From this unique conciliatory framework, the volume explores how narra- tives and other cultural representations transform complex scientific issues into digestible bits of information based on particular selections and deflections. Some of the contributions analyze how scientific representations and metaphors of science take shape in pictures, cartoons, and television broadcasts, but also in novels and popular magazines. Others specifically focus on the implications of these representations and (mis)understandings for science education, both in ix x Introduction formal and informal educational settings. Thematically, the contributions focus on a wide range of current debates about evolutionary theory, global warming, genetic modification, and so on. As such, it indirectly engages with discussions pertaining to the politics of science. The aim of this volume is to engage in the ongoing debate about the public understanding of science and is original in its interdisciplinary scope, ranging from philosophy, cognitive psychology, anthro- pology, and biology to literature, cultural studies, and rhetoric. Public Understanding of Science There has been increasing attention on the valorization of scientific research, in combination with a growing public debate about the uses and applications of sci- entific findings for social and economic purposes (Benneworth and Jongbloed). Media coverage of scientific findings plays an important role in shaping the public understanding of science and as such creates a context for socio-ethical debates about the application and development of scientific research (van Dijck). However, the communication of science is always, inevitably partial and this partiality raises issues of authority, creates potential misunderstandings, and complicates the public debate about science (Tietge). One of the main aims of science communication and programs aimed at increasing scientific literacy is to create a better public understanding of science and to emphasize its wider rele- vance to society (Gross, “Roles”). Science communication often consists of a one-way flow from scientists to the general public by accommodating scientific findings to a nonexpert audience. Such a unilateral approach is indeed important for transferring relevant scientific knowledge to society but runs the risk of disregarding the contexts that give sci- ence its public significance and the ambiguities that arise from particular framings in the public debate (Gross, “Roles” and Rhetoric). Public concerns and opinions from stakeholders are often seen as (unwarranted) anxieties or vested interests rather than “assets” that have a role to play in the debate about scientific develop- ments and applications (Bauer; Bauer, Shukla and Allum). There is an entangled and reciprocal relationship between science and society and therefore there is a need for a better understanding of the accommodation of scientific findings from experts to lay audiences, for an understanding of the different positions in the sci- entific and the public debate, and for an integration of scientific developments and the needs of society (Fahnestock; Gross, “Roles” and Rhetoric; Tietge, Rational). For example, there is an ongoing body of research on the public under- standing of genetics. Although there have been vast scientific advances in DNA Perspectives on Science and Culture xi technology, the socio-ethical and the legal and political debates still remain very contested and ambivalent. In her seminal work, Imagenation, José van Dijck has shown that the public imagination of genetics has undergone an important trans- formation during the decades that this branch of scientific research took shape, as the synopsis of her book notes: “From news stories of DNA strings escaping from our laboratories to the ongoing debates over bioethics, from James Watson and The Double Helix to the Human Genome Project, Van Dijck portrays the ‘imaginary’ tools of genetics as players in a theater of representation — a multi- layered contest in which special interest groups and professional organizations mobilize images in a heated debate over the meaning of genetics” (van Dijck). Popular representations of genetics do not necessarily reflect the advancement of genetic technology but these cultural accounts offer the repertoires and images with which different stakeholders debate the social, legal,
Recommended publications
  • In Defense of Massive Modularity

    In Defense of Massive Modularity

    3 In Defense of Massive Modularity Dan Sperber In October 1990, a psychologist, Susan Gelman, and three anthropolo- gists whose interest in cognition had been guided and encouraged by Jacques Mehler, Scott Atran, Larry Hirschfeld, and myself, organized a conference on “Cultural Knowledge and Domain Specificity” (see Hirsch- feld and Gelman, 1994). Jacques advised us in the preparation of the conference, and while we failed to convince him to write a paper, he did play a major role in the discussions. A main issue at stake was the degree to which cognitive development, everyday cognition, and cultural knowledge are based on dedicated do- main-specific mechanisms, as opposed to a domain-general intelligence and learning capacity. Thanks in particular to the work of developmental psychologists such as Susan Carey, Rochel Gelman, Susan Gelman, Frank Keil, Alan Leslie, Jacques Mehler, Elizabeth Spelke (who were all there), the issue of domain-specificity—which, of course, Noam Chomsky had been the first to raise—was becoming a central one in cognitive psychol- ogy. Evolutionary psychology, represented at the conference by Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, was putting forward new arguments for seeing human cognition as involving mostly domain- or task-specific evolved adaptations. We were a few anthropologists, far from the main- stream of our discipline, who also saw domain-specific cognitive pro- cesses as both constraining and contributing to cultural development. Taking for granted that domain-specific dispositions are an important feature of human cognition, three questions arise: 1. To what extent are these domain-specific dispositions based on truly autonomous mental mechanisms or “modules,” as opposed to being 48 D.
  • Natural Causes of Language Frames, Biases, and Cultural Transmission

    Natural Causes of Language Frames, Biases, and Cultural Transmission

    Natural causes of language Frames, biases, and cultural transmission N. J. Enfield language Conceptual Foundations of science press Language Science 1 Conceptual Foundations of Language Science Series editors Mark Dingemanse, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics N. J. Enfield, University of Sydney Editorial board Balthasar Bickel, University of Zürich, Claire Bowern, Yale University, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, University of Helsinki, William Croft, University of New Mexico, Rose-Marie Déchaine, University of British Columbia, William A. Foley, University of Sydney , William F. Hanks, University of California at Berkeley, Paul Kockelman, Yale University, Keren Rice, University of Toronto, Sharon Rose, University of California at San Diego, Frederick J. Newmeyer, University of Washington, Wendy Sandler, University of Haifa, Dan Sperber Central European University No scientific work proceeds without conceptual foundations. In language science, our concepts about language determine our assumptions, direct our attention, and guide our hypotheses and our reasoning. Only with clarity about conceptual foundations can we pose coherent research questions, design critical experiments, and collect crucial data. This series publishes short and accessible books that explore well-defined topics in the conceptual foundations of language science. The series provides a venue for conceptual arguments and explorations that do not require the traditional book- length treatment, yet that demand more space than a typical journal article allows. In this series: 1. N. J. Enfield. Natural causes of language. Natural causes of language Frames, biases, and cultural transmission N. J. Enfield language science press N. J. Enfield. 2014. Natural causes of language: Frames, biases, and cultural transmission (Conceptual Foundations of Language Science 1). Berlin: Language Science Press.
  • The Idea of Universality in Linguistics and Human Rights

    The Idea of Universality in Linguistics and Human Rights

    The Idea of Universality in Linguistics and Human Rights SPEAKER: Noam Chomsky Institute Professor; Professor of Linguistics SPEAKER: Elizabeth S. Spelke Professor of Psychology Co- Director, Mind, Brain, and Behavior Inter-faculty Initiative, Harvard University. The Idea of SPEAKERS: Universality in Noam Chomsky: Institute Professor; Professor of Linguistics Linguistics and Human Rights Elizabeth S. Spelke: Professor of Psychology Co-Director, Noam Chomsky Mind, Brain, and Behavior Inter-faculty Initiative, Harvard March 15,2005 University. Time 00:57:13 ABOUT THE LECTURE: If humans have a common, in-born capacity for language, and Audio Only: for such complex behaviors as morality, might the faculties be QuickTime – 28MB somehow linked? Noam Chomsky perceives a mere thread of MP3 - 70MB a connection. At breakneck speed, Chomsky leads us through Audio and Video: a history of language theory, concluding with the revolutionary QuickTime - 371MB model he championed: a universal grammar underpinning all WindowsMedia - 313MB languages that corresponds to an innate capacity of the human RealVideo - 101MB brain. While scientists may now have a “clearer grasp of the universals of language,” says Chomsky, notions of universality grow murky as we move “into domains of will, choice and judgment.” Chomsky cites the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as one example of “broad cross-cultural consensus.” But he brandishes examples of how “our moral and intellectual culture….forcefully rejects universal moral judgments” -- such as continued U.S.
  • Catalyst, Fall 2010

    Catalyst, Fall 2010

    Founded in 1888 as the Marine Biological Laboratory Catalyst Fall 2010 Volume 5, Number 2 IN THIS ISSUE 4 Diamond In the Rough 8 Life, Interrupted 10 Bird Strike! Where Are They Now MBL People Shaping Science and Society Page 2 F r o m t h e D i r e c t o r Dear Friends, MBL Catalyst One of the great pleasures of teaching is hearing good news from former students. For those who have taught at the MBL—whether it was in a summer course, or in Fall 2010 Volume 5, Number 2 our resident undergraduate and graduate programs—alumni news is often very MBL Catalyst is published twice yearly by the Office rewarding. We hear from former undergraduates who are now enrolled in the best of Communications at the MBL in Woods Hole, Ph.D. programs in the country. We hear from post-docs who have published exciting Massachusetts. The Marine Biological Laboratory research, and who find the dream of establishing their own lab is within reach. We (MBL) is dedicated to scientific discovery and are delighted to hear from senior scientists who are in leadership positions, or are improving the human condition through research recipients of the highest accolades in science and scholarship, yet who stay in touch and education in biology, biomedicine, and with their colleagues or mentors at the MBL. environmental science. Founded in 1888, the MBL is an independent, nonprofit corporation. This is the scientific family that so much defines the MBL: the successive generations of teachers and their students, many of whom eventually come back to the MBL to Senior Advisors Director and CEO: Gary Borisy teach.
  • Building a Popular Science Library Collection for High School to Adult Learners: ISSUES and RECOMMENDED RESOURCES

    Building a Popular Science Library Collection for High School to Adult Learners: ISSUES and RECOMMENDED RESOURCES

    Building a Popular Science Library Collection for High School to Adult Learners: ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED RESOURCES Gregg Sapp GREENWOOD PRESS BUILDING A POPULAR SCIENCE LIBRARY COLLECTION FOR HIGH SCHOOL TO ADULT LEARNERS Building a Popular Science Library Collection for High School to Adult Learners ISSUES AND RECOMMENDED RESOURCES Gregg Sapp GREENWOOD PRESS Westport, Connecticut • London Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sapp, Gregg. Building a popular science library collection for high school to adult learners : issues and recommended resources / Gregg Sapp. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–313–28936–0 1. Libraries—United States—Special collections—Science. I. Title. Z688.S3S27 1995 025.2'75—dc20 94–46939 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data is available. Copyright ᭧ 1995 by Gregg Sapp All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 94–46939 ISBN: 0–313–28936–0 First published in 1995 Greenwood Press, 88 Post Road West, Westport, CT 06881 An imprint of Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. Printed in the United States of America TM The paper used in this book complies with the Permanent Paper Standard issued by the National Information Standards Organization (Z39.48–1984). 10987654321 To Kelsey and Keegan, with love, I hope that you never stop learning. Contents Preface ix Part I: Scientific Information, Popular Science, and Lifelong Learning 1
  • Stephen Jay Gould's the Mismeasure of Man1

    Stephen Jay Gould's the Mismeasure of Man1

    - 1 - STEPHEN JAY GOULD’S THE MISMEASURE OF MAN1 The first thing that a man will do for his ideals is lie. (Joseph Schumpeter, History of Economic Analysis. Oxford University Press, 1954: page 43) INTRODUCTION There is no better illustration of the non-existence of arguments and evidence against the genetic determinism of intelligence and of racial differences in intelligence than Stephen Jay Gould's The Mismeasure of Man and no better illustration of the ignorance and bias of the press on this subject than its treatment of it. 2 Since its publication (by Penguin) in 1981, The Mismeasure of Man has been the Bible of the opponents of genetic determinism of intelligence and one of the most frequently cited books on any topic in the social sciences.3 It has been translated into ten languages and received the Outstanding Book Award from the American Educational Research Association and the National Book Critics Circle Award. In 1995 two collections of articles attacking The Bell Curve were published: The Bell Curve Debate4 and The Bell Curve Wars.5 The first article in both is by Gould, and in both these articles Gould cited his book and repeats its arguments. The reviews of The Mismeasure of Man in the popular press were uncritically adulatory. The reviews in scholarly journals, by experts, all of whom point out that it is a mosaic of blatant lies and gross misrepresentations. The media’s acclaim for The Mismeasure of Man stems not only from receptivity to its ideas but also from the eminence of its author.
  • Read the Full PDF

    Read the Full PDF

    The Science on Women and Science The Science on Women and Science Christina Hoff Sommers Editor The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 15200 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 17214. To order call toll free 1-800-462-6420 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036 or call 1-800-862-5801. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The science on women and science / Christina Hoff Sommers, editor. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN-13: 978-0-8447-4281-6 ISBN-10: 0-8447-4281-3 1. Women in science. 2. Sex discrimination against women. 3. Sex differences in education. I. Sommers, Christina Hoff. Q130.S364 2009 2009022004 13 12 11 10 09 1 2 3 4 5 © 2009 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States of America Contents INTRODUCTION: THE SCIENCE ON WOMEN IN SCIENCE, Christina Hoff Sommers 1 Notes 5 References 6 1WHY SO FEW WOMEN IN MATH AND SCIENCE? Simon Baron-Cohen 7 Sex Differences in the General Population 11 Female Advantage in Empathy 15 Culture and Biology 18 Conclusions 18 Notes 20 References 21 2GENDER, MATH, AND SCIENCE, Elizabeth S.
  • Moira Rose (Molly) Dillon

    Moira Rose (Molly) Dillon

    Moira Rose Dillon Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003 Email – [email protected] Departmental Website – http://as.nyu.edu/psychology/people/faculty.Moira-Dillon.html Lab Website – https://www.labdevelopingmind.com Employment New York University New York, NY Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences (July 2017-present) Concurrent Positions New York University New York, NY Faculty Affiliate, Institute of Human Development and Social Change, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development (May 2019-present) Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA Invited Researcher, Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL), Foundations of Learning (April 2021-present) Education Harvard University Cambridge, MA (August 2011-May 2017) Ph.D., Psychology (May 2017) A.M., Psychology (May 2014) Yale University New Haven, CT (August 2004-May 2008) B.A., Cognitive Science; Art (May 2008) Funding 2019-2024 National Science Foundation (PI: $1,718,437) CAREER: Becoming Euclid: Characterizing the geometric intuitions that support formal learning in mathematics (PI: $24,671) CLB: Career-Life Balance Faculty Early Career Development Program Supplement 2019-2023 DARPA (Co-PI; to NYU: $1,703,553; to Dillon: $871,874) Cognitive milestones for Machine Common Sense, Co-PI: Brenden Lake 2019-2021 Jacobs Foundation (PI: 150,000 CHF) Early Career Research Fellowship 2018-2019 Institute of Human Development and Social Change at NYU (PI: $14,848) The arc of geometric
  • Society for Research in Child Development Newsletter, 2003. INSTITUTION Society for Research in Child Development

    Society for Research in Child Development Newsletter, 2003. INSTITUTION Society for Research in Child Development

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 480 656 PS 031 539 AUTHOR Reid, Pamela Trotman, Ed.; Ehart, Bridget, Ed. TITLE Society for Research in Child Development Newsletter, 2003. INSTITUTION Society for Research in Child Development. PUB DATE 2003-00-00 NOTE 62p.; For the 2002 issues, see PS 031 538. AVAILABLE FROM Society for Research in Child Development, University of Michigan, 3131 South State Street, Suite 302, Ann Arbor, MI 48108-1623. Tel: 734-998-6574; Fax: 734-998-6569; e-mail: [email protected]; Web site: http://www.srcd.org. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Society for Research in Child Development Newsletter; v46 nl- 4 2003 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC03 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Child Development; Coping; *Developmental Psychology; Emotional Adjustment; Financial Support; Information Dissemination; Newsletters; **Organizations (Groups); Program Descriptions; Psychological Studies; Public Policy; School Desegregation; Terrorism IDENTIFIERS Project Head Start; *Society for Research in Child Development ABSTRACT This document consists of the four 2003 issues of a newsletter disseminating information on the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD) and providing a forum for important news, research, and information concerning advancement in child growth and development research. Each issue of the newsletter includes announcements and notices of conferences, workshops, position openings, fellowship, and member obituaries. The January issue summarizes meetings of the Consortium for Social Science Associations and the Human Development
  • Dark, Beyond Deep: a Paradigm Shift to Cognitive AI with Humanlike Common Sense

    Dark, Beyond Deep: a Paradigm Shift to Cognitive AI with Humanlike Common Sense

    Dark, Beyond Deep: A Paradigm Shift to Cognitive AI with Humanlike Common Sense Yixin Zhua,∗, Tao Gaoa, Lifeng Fana, Siyuan Huanga, Mark Edmondsa, Hangxin Liua, Feng Gaoa, Chi Zhanga, Siyuan Qia, Ying Nian Wua, Joshua B. Tenenbaumb, Song-Chun Zhua aCenter for Vision, Cognition, Learning, and Autonomy (VCLA), UCLA bCenter for Brains, Minds, and Machines (CBMM), MIT Abstract Recent progress in deep learning is essentially based on a “big data for small tasks” paradigm, under which massive amounts of data are used to train a classifier for a single narrow task. In this paper, we call for a shift that flips this paradigm upside down. Specifically, we propose a “small data for big tasks” paradigm, wherein a single artificial intelligence (AI) system is challenged to develop “common sense,” enabling it to solve a wide range of tasks with little training data. We illustrate the potential power of this new paradigm by reviewing models of common sense that synthesize recent breakthroughs in both machine and human vision. We identify functionality, physics, intent, causality, and utility (FPICU) as the five core domains of cognitive AI with humanlike common sense. When taken as a unified concept, FPICU is concerned with the questions of “why” and “how,” beyond the dominant “what” and “where” framework for understanding vision. They are invisible in terms of pixels but nevertheless drive the creation, maintenance, and development of visual scenes. We therefore coin them the “dark matter” of vision. Just as our universe cannot be understood by merely studying observable matter, we argue that vision cannot be understood without studying FPICU.
  • Throw Away That Science Book! Enlightened

    Throw Away That Science Book! Enlightened

    Throw Away That Science Book! “Errant Texts” and “Where’s the Book?” by Janet Raloff, in Science News (Mar. 17 & 24, 2001), 1719 N St., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036. Don’t know much about history, Advancement of Science, project director Don’t know much biology. George Nelson says, “Even if the science had Don’t know much about a science book, been 100 percent accurate, students still Don’t know much about the French I took. wouldn’t learn from these books, because the instruction [in them] was inadequate.” Often, Those memorable lines from Sam Cooke’s legions of facts were crammed into the texts, with “Wonderful World,” that golden oldie from little to connect them. 1960, could well be the anthem of American The middle-school textbooks are typically students today, to judge from the grades they put together by an editor working with contri- regularly get on international tests in science butions from contract writers who often have lit- and math. U.S. fourth graders did poorly in tle control over the final product. And the 1996, and four years later, as eighth graders, results are less likely than high school and col- they did even worse, trailing their counter- lege science textbooks to be vetted by profes- parts in 17 other countries. Ironically, a big part sional scientists. of the problem may be that very science book One exception to the dismal rule, Raloff they don’t know much about. found, is Introductory Physical Science (1999, A recent study of the dozen physical-science seventh rev.
  • Susan J. Hespos

    Susan J. Hespos

    Susan J. Hespos Department of Psychology Northwestern University 2029 Sheridan Rd. Evanston, IL 60208-2710 http://www.psychology.northwestern.edu/people/faculty/core/profiles/susan-hespos.html http://sites.northwestern.edu/infantcognitionlab/ [email protected] Education 1996 Ph.D. Developmental Psychology, Emory University 1993 M.A. Cognitive Psychology, Emory University 1990 B.A. Psychology, Reed College Academic Positions 2009 – present Associate Professor of Psychology, Northwestern University Cognitive Science Program Learning Sciences Interdepartmental Neuroscience NSF Spatial Intelligence & Learning Center 2005 – 2009 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Northwestern University 2001 – 2005 Assistant Professor of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University 1998 – 2001 Postdoctoral Fellow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Advisor: Elizabeth Spelke 1996 – 1998 Postdoctoral Fellow, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana Advisor: Renee Baillargeon Major Professional Interest: I uncover the earliest evidence of our cognitive capacities in infancy and describe what changes over development. Through this process we gain information critical to understanding cognition in general. Academic Awards 2011 Kellogg Management Skills for Innovative University Leaders Fellowship 2006 Distinguished Teaching Award from the Undergraduate Psychology Association Northwestern University 2004 Professor of the Month, Selected by the Greek Community / Panhellenic Council Vanderbilt University 2000 McDonnell-Pew Junior Scientist Research