DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Testing for the Kyrene Expansion Project, by T

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Testing for the Kyrene Expansion Project, by T Archaeological Testing for the Kyrene Expansion Project T. Kathleen Henderson Contributions by Tiffany C. Clark Kevin G. Frison Gregson Schachner Archaeological Testing for the Kyrene Expansion Project T. Kathleen Henderson Contributions by Tiffany C. Clark Kevin G. Frison Gregson Schachner Submitted to Mr. John L. Keane Environmental Planning, P AB 355 Salt River Project 1521 N. Project Drive Phoenix, Arizona 85281 Teclmical Report No. 2000-09 Desert Archaeology, Inc. 3975 North Tucson Boulevard, Tucson, Arizona 85716 • September 2000 ABSTRACT Archaeological testing was conducted at the Salt the site of Los Guanacos, AZ U:9:116 (ASM), a National River Project Kyrene Generating Station located east of Register-eligible historic property. Two archaeological Kyrene Road between Guadalupe and Elliot roads in features of modern age, an irrigation ditch and the Tempe, Maricopa County, Arizona. The testing took remains of a tool shed, were identified also. place at the site of a proposed new natural gas-fired The prehistoric archaeological remains contain generating station adjacent to the existing generating information importantto prehistory and are considered station in the Pole and Tank yards of the Kyrene contributing elements to the National Register-eligible facility. A proposed new and realigned gas line route property. Some form of treatment is recommended to was investigated also. The purpose of testing was to mitigate the impact of proposed development in the determine if significant subsurface archaeological project area. Appropriate treatment options include site remains were present in the proposed plant site and its preservation through avoidance of any construction related facilities. activities at the locations of the archaeological remains; One hundred and twenty-three archaeological mitigation of potential adverse effects of construction features were documented in 2,774 m of backhoe and development through a program of archaeological trenches placed strategically across the project area. data recovery; or a program that combines elements of One hundred and twenty-one of the features are avoidance and data recovery for selected portions of prehistoric and affiliated with the Hohokam culture. the property. A data recovery plan is presented that Identified types include pithouses, cremation burials, identifies actions to mitigate adverse effects onarchaeo­ roasting pits and ovens, borrow pits, other small and logical features in areas that will be developed. The large pits, and a settling basin. All appear to date to the planincludes a research design and work plan that will late pre-Classic or Classic Hohokam periods. A review provide for the recovery of significant data values from of previous archaeological research in the project the site. vicinity indicates the prehistoric features are a part of ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The testing project could not have been accom­ The fieldwork was accomplished by an able crew plished effectively without the ready support of consisting variously of Tiffany Clark, Casey Counts, Richard Anduze, Archaeologist, and John Keane, Kevin Frison, Umberto Fuentes, Tom Prang, John Executive Environmental Analyst, of the Environmen­ Rockhill, Greg Schachner, and Caroline Shurrab. Ellen tal Planning and Technology Initiatives division of Salt Ruble is especially thanked not only for her role as River Project (SRP). Rick's quick responses to questions Field Director of the Tank Yard testing, but also for her regarding mobilizing and coordinating the fieldwork effort in mobilizing the project. Backhoe trenches were across the myriad facilities of the Kyrene Station were cut and backfilled by Gene Jenstad, Mark Myers, and essential to the project's completion. His enthusiasm, Robert Ybarra of Desert Diggers Backhoe Service, Inc. patience, and interest are greatly appreciated. Special thanks to Ron Freestone of Desert Diggers for Sincere thanks are extended to SRP staff who his alacrity in attending to our backhoe needs. facilitated the progress of various segments of the Stephanie Sherwood and Brian Fisher of Compass project. These individuals include: Dave Marsh, Fore­ Rose Technical Services provided field mapping and man, and Mike Hitt, Manager, for their roles in coordi­ computer cartography. The illustrations in this report nating activity in the Tank Yard; Greg Klippel, Material were skillfully prepared by Stephanie Sherwood. Handler, Rick Lott, Manager, and Michael Voda, Support from the Desert Archaeology office was an Electrical System Engineer, who facilitated the field­ essential element of this project. Lisa Eppley processed work in the Pole Yard; Floyd Stewart, Manager, and the recovered artifacts and flotation samples, and Sara Dudley Harris, Senior Engineering Technician, who Lely entered the data from the many field forms. Lisa oversaw fieldwork in the 500 kV Switchyard; and also undertook an inventory-level analYSis of the flaked George Murray, Manager, and Wayne Wisdom, for and ground stone artifacts, and Mike Diehl performed facilitating trench excavations in Central Reclamation an analysis of several flotation samples. Dena McDuffie and the Tempe Service Center, respectively. Peter and her team produced this report. Tiffany Clark Kandaris, Senior Engineer, and Lori Trout, Environ­ conducted the ceramic analysis under my supervision; ment, provided useful information and oversight. James Heidke provided valuable comment about Special gratitude is conveyed to Greg Klippel and his coding variables for this effort. Thanks go to these staff, for their long, harried effort in removing poles individuals, as well as Henry Wallace, Beth Miksa, and other equipment from the Pole Yard, and to Jenny Adams, and Jane Sliva for their insight on Dudley Harris, who provided cheerful escort and research issues that might be relevant to data recovery oversight of excavations and backfilling in the 500 kV investigations of the project's archaeological remains. Switchyard. Also appreciated are those SRP employees David Abbott, a private consultant, is also thanked in who visited the excavations and expressed both aston­ this regard. A debt is finally owed to Trish Castalia and ishment and wonder upon seeing what lay beneath Bill Doelle for their interest, comment, and general their facility. support in the project's completion. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ........................................................................................ ii Acknowledgments ............................................................................. iii List of Figures. .. vi List of Tables .................................................................................. vii 1. INTRODUCTION, T. Kathleen Henderson. .. 1 Project Area Location and Description ........................................................... 4 Organization of the Report ..................................................................... 4 2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND CULTURAL SETTING, T. Kathleen Henderson and Tiffany C. Clark . ........... 5 Environmental Setting ........................................................................ 5 Archaeological Background . .. 6 Modern Use of the Project Area ................................................................. 9 3. PREVIOUS RESEARCH, T. Kathleen Henderson and Kevin G. Frison . .. 11 Early Archaeological Research ................................................................ 11 Recent Archaeological Research ............................................................... 16 Investigations outside the Kyrene Facility .................................................... 18 Investigations inside the Kyrene Facility ..................................................... 20 Historic Resources . .. 22 Summary and Discussion . .. 22 4. FIELD METHODS AND RESULTS, T. Kathleen Henderson and Gregson Schachner ...................... 23 Field Methods .............................................................................. 23 Backhoe Trenching .. " ................................................................... 23 Feature Recording ........................................................................ 31 Collections .............................................................................. 31 Excavations. .. 31 Mapping ................................................................................. 31 Field Results. .. 31 Project Area Stratigraphy and Disturbances .................................................. 33 Summary ............................................................................... 35 5. FEATURE DESCRIPTIONS, Gregson Schachner and T. Kathleen Henderson ............................ 37 Pithouses ................................................................................... 37 Pithouse Descriptions ..................................................................... 40 Extramural Features ......................................................................... 44 Pits ..................................................................................... 44 Homos and Roasting Pits .................................................................. 47 Hearth .................................................................................. 48 Extramural Surface ....................................................................... 49 Settling Basin ............................................................................ 49 Human Remains ............................................................................ 51 Feature 57 .... .. 51 Feature 102 ... .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recent Achievements in Archaeomagnetic Dating in the Iberian Peninsula: Application to Roman and Mediaeval Spanish Structures
    Journal of Archaeological Science 35 (2008) 1389e1398 http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jas Recent achievements in archaeomagnetic dating in the Iberian Peninsula: application to Roman and Mediaeval Spanish structures M. Go´mez-Paccard a,*, E. Beamud b a Research Group of Geodynamics and Basin Analysis, Department of Stratigraphy, Paleontology and Marine Geosciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Campus de Pedralbes, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain b Research Group of Geodynamics and Basin Analysis, Paleomagnetic Laboratory (UB-CSIC), Institute of Earth Sciences ‘‘Jaume Almera’’, Sole´ i Sabarı´s, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain Received 18 May 2007; received in revised form 25 September 2007; accepted 8 October 2007 Abstract Archaeomagnetic studies in Spain have undergone a significant progress during the last few years and a reference curve of the directional variation of the geomagnetic field over the past two millennia is now available for the Iberian Peninsula. These recent developments have made archaeomagnetism a straightforward dating tool for Spain and Portugal. The aim of this work is to illustrate how this secular variation curve can be used to date the last use of several burnt structures from Spain. Four combustion structures from three archaeological sites with ages ranging from Roman to Mediaeval times have been studied and archaeomagnetically dated. The directions of the characteristic remanent magnetization of each structure have been obtained from classical thermal and alternating field (AF) demagnetization procedures, and a mean direction for each combustion structure has been obtained. These directional results have been compared with the new reference curve for Iberia, providing archae- omagnetic dates for the last use of the kilns.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating at the Millennium
    P1: IAS Journal of Archaeological Research [jar] pp469-jare-369967 June 17, 2002 12:45 Style file version June 4th, 2002 Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2002 (C 2002) Archaeological Tree-Ring Dating at the Millennium Stephen E. Nash1 Tree-ring analysis provides chronological, environmental, and behavioral data to a wide variety of disciplines related to archaeology including architectural analysis, climatology, ecology, history, hydrology, resource economics, volcanology, and others. The pace of worldwide archaeological tree-ring research has accelerated in the last two decades, and significant contributions have recently been made in archaeological chronology and chronometry, paleoenvironmental reconstruction, and the study of human behavior in both the Old and New Worlds. This paper reviews a sample of recent contributions to tree-ring method, theory, and data, and makes some suggestions for future lines of research. KEY WORDS: dendrochronology; dendroclimatology; crossdating; tree-ring dating. INTRODUCTION Archaeology is a multidisciplinary social science that routinely adopts an- alytical techniques from disparate fields of inquiry to answer questions about human behavior and material culture in the prehistoric, historic, and recent past. Dendrochronology, literally “the study of tree time,” is a multidisciplinary sci- ence that provides chronological and environmental data to an astonishing vari- ety of archaeologically relevant fields of inquiry, including architectural analysis, biology, climatology, economics,
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Dating of Pleistocene Sites: Guidelines for Best Practice Contents
    Consultation Draft Scientific Dating of Pleistocene Sites: Guidelines for Best Practice Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. 3 PART 1 - OVERVIEW .............................................................................................................. 3 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 3 The Quaternary stratigraphical framework ........................................................................ 4 Palaeogeography ........................................................................................................... 6 Fitting the archaeological record into this dynamic landscape .............................................. 6 Shorter-timescale division of the Late Pleistocene .............................................................. 7 2. Scientific Dating methods for the Pleistocene ................................................................. 8 Radiometric methods ..................................................................................................... 8 Trapped Charge Methods................................................................................................ 9 Other scientific dating methods ......................................................................................10 Relative dating methods ................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications
    The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications By Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife The Physical Evolution of the North Avon Levels: a Review and Summary of the Archaeological Implications by Michael J. Allen and Robert G. Scaife with contributions from J.R.L. Allen, Nigel G. Cameron, Alan J. Clapham, Rowena Gale, and Mark Robinson with an introduction by Julie Gardiner Wessex Archaeology Internet Reports Published 2010 by Wessex Archaeology Ltd Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, SP4 6EB http://www.wessexarch.co.uk/ Copyright © Wessex Archaeology Ltd 2010 all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Contents List of Figures List of Plates List of Tables Editor’s Introduction, by Julie Gardiner .......................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION The Severn Levels ............................................................................................................................ 5 The Wentlooge Formation ............................................................................................................... 5 The Avon Levels .............................................................................................................................. 6 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 7 THE INVESTIGATIONS The research/fieldwork: methods of investigation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ervan Garrison Second Edition
    Natural Science in Archaeology Ervan Garrison Techniques in Archaeological Geology Second Edition Natural Science in Archaeology Series editors Gu¨nther A. Wagner Christopher E. Miller Holger Schutkowski More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/3703 Ervan Garrison Techniques in Archaeological Geology Second Edition Ervan Garrison Department of Geology, University of Georgia Athens, Georgia, USA ISSN 1613-9712 Natural Science in Archaeology ISBN 978-3-319-30230-0 ISBN 978-3-319-30232-4 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-30232-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2016933149 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made.
    [Show full text]
  • Dating and Chronology Building - R
    ARCHAEOLOGY – Dating and Chronology Building - R. E. Taylor DATING AND CHRONOLOGY BUILDING R. E. Taylor University of California, USA Keywords: Dating methods, chronometric dating, seriation, stratigraphy, geochronology, radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon/argon-argon dating, Pleistocene, Quaternary. Contents 1. Chronological Frameworks 1.1 Relative and Chronometric Time 1.2 History and Prehistory 2. Chronology in Archaeology 2.1 Historical Development 2.2 Geochronological Units 3. Chronology Building 3.1 Development of Historic Chronologies 3.2 Development of Prehistoric Chronologies 3.3 Stratigraphy 3.4 Seriation 4. Chronometric Dating Methods 4.1 Radiocarbon 4.2 Potassium-argon and Argon-argon Dating 4.3 Dendrochronology 4.4 Archaeomagnetic Dating 4.5 Obsidian Hydration Acknowledgments Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary One of the purposes of archaeological research is the examination of the evolution of human cultures.UNESCO Since a fundamental defini– tionEOLSS of evolution is “change over time,” chronology is a fundamental archaeological parameter. Archaeology shares with a number of otherSAMPLE sciences concerned with temporally CHAPTERS mediated phenomenon the need to view its data within an accurate chronological framework. For archaeology, such a requirement needs to be met if any meaningful understanding of evolutionary processes is to be inferred from the physical residue of past human behavior. 1. Chronological Frameworks Chronology orders the sequential relationship of physical events by associating these events with some type of time scale. Depending on the phenomenon for which temporal placement is required, it is helpful to distinguish different types of time scales. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) ARCHAEOLOGY – Dating and Chronology Building - R. E. Taylor Geochronological (geological) time scales temporally relates physical structures of the Earth’s solid surface and buried features, documenting the 4.5–5.0 billion year history of the planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Herries 2009
    16 New approaches for integrating palaeomagnetic and mineral magnetic methods to answer archaeological and geological questions on Stone Age sites Andy I. R. Herries Human Origins Group and Primate Origins Program School of Medical Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia. [email protected] Geomagnetism Laboratory Oliver Lodge, University of Liverpool, UK [email protected] Introduction and aims Archaeomagnetism as defined here is the use of magnetic methods of analysis on archaeological materials and deposits, although in its widest context it refers to the magnetisation of any materials relating to archaeological times. It is most widely known for its use in dating, but more recently it has been utilised for other purposes including site survey, sourcing and palaeoclimatic reconstruction. These applications have different site requirements, as discussed below. Two main methods of analysis exist: those that look at the direction and intensity of fossil remnant magnetisations, as in palaeomagnetism; and those related to looking at the mineralogy, grain size and concentration of minerals within a rock or sediment, as in mineral (rock, environmental) magnetism. In the later case, identification of these parameters is achieved by different types and strengths of laboratory-induced remnant magnetisations and/or heat into samples to see how they react or alter. Magnetic methods have, over the last 10 years, been increasingly used as a Quaternary method of analysis for a variety of applications including dating, sediment-source tracing, and palaeo- environmental/climatic reconstruction. While these methods have been used on some archaeological sites (e.g. Ellwood et al., 1997; Dalan and Banerjee 1998; Moringa et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeomagnetism and Archaeomagnetic Dating (English Version)
    Archaeomagnetism and archaeomagnetic dating (English version) J. Hus, R. Geeraerts and S. Spassov (2003) Jozef Hus Centre de Physique du Globe Institut Royal Météorologique de Belgique Dourbes B-5670 Belgium [email protected] Summary This document is intended for primarily archaeologists and those with excavation responsibles, but also for persons who want to take archaeomagnetic samples for archaeomagnetic dating and those who wish to become involved with archaeomagnetism. It deals with the principals of archaeomagnetism and archaeomagnetic dating and provides useful information and recommendations for the archaeologists who want their baked structures to be investigated archaeomagnetically. In order for the archaeomagnetists to be able to construct standard diagrams of the geomagnetic field variations in the past and to improve archaeomagnetic datings in the future, the document stresses the importance of archaeomagnetic investigations of independently dated baked structures. The document also contains general information on the geomagnetic field, and the answers to frequently asked questions. The content is mainly based on textbooks given in the references and on a few web sites. Words in bold in the text are explained in the glossary. 2 1. Introduction Archaeomagnetism is mainly known by the archaeologists as a dating method: archaeomagnetic dating. Archaeomagnetism of baked clays was developed in France in the nineteen thirties by Prof. E. Thellier and his wife O. Thellier. In the nineteen sixties it started to be applied as a relatively reliable and precise dating method for baked structures, particularly by M.J. Aitken in the United Kingdom. This dating method is interdisciplinary, requiring the expertise of specialists in different fields and particularly a close collaboration between archaeologists and geophysicists.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Order%The%Numbering%Of%Subheadings%
    1Order%the%numbering%of%subheadings% Paleomagnetic%geochronology%of%Quaternary%sequences%in%the%Levant1% % Ron%Shaar1,%Erez%BenAYosef2%% 1"The"Institute"of"Earth"Sciences,"The"Hebrew"University"of"Jerusalem,"Jerusalem," 91904,"Israel."[email protected]" 2"Department"of"ArchaeoloGy"and"Near"Eastern"Cultures,"Tel"Aviv"University,"TelK Aviv,"6997801,"Israel."[email protected]" X.1%Introduction% PaleomaGnetic"datinG"methods"are"based"on"comparinG"maGnetic" information"from"materials"or"sequences"whose"aGes"are"at"least"partly"unknown" with"the"GeomaGnetic"chronoloGy."The"Global"Quaternary"GeomaGnetic"chronoloGy"is" continuously"updated"and"includes"at"the"moment"10"polarity"reversals"and"at"least" 18"validated"GeomaGnetic"excursions"that"serve"as"chronological"markers"for" sedimentary"and"volcanic"sequences."In"addition,"shortKterm"secular"variations"of" the"past"several"millennia"can"be"used"for"the"Holocene."Here,"we"review"the" principles"underlying"paleomagnetic"chronology"with"emphasis"on"Quaternary" rocks,"sediments,"and"archaeoloGical"substances."We"summarize"a"number"of" successful"applications"of"paleomagnetic"dating"in"the"Levant,"and"provide"insight" into"future"possibilities"of"Quaternary"paleomaGnetism."" """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" 1"This"chapter"is"dedicated"to"the"memory"of"our"late"mentor"and"dear"friend"Professor"HaGai"Ron" who"has"pioneered"paleomaGnetic"research"in"the"reGion" Earth"maGnetic"field"is"constantly"changing"at"decades"to"millions"of"years" time"scales."The"effort"of"reconstructing"past"GeomaGnetic"variations"have"been"
    [Show full text]
  • An Updated Catalog of Pre-Hispanic Archaeomagnetic Data for North And
    Boletín de la Sociedad Geológica Mexicana / 2019 / 497 An updated catalog of pre-hispanic archaeomagnetic data for north and central Mesoamerica: Implications for the regional paleosecular variation reference curve Ana Ma. Soler-Arechalde, Cecilia Caballero-Miranda, Ma. Luisa Osete-López, Verónica López-Delgado, Avto Goguitchaichvili, Alan Barrera-Huerta, Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi ABSTRACT Ana Ma. Soler-Arechalde ABSTRACT RESUMEN [email protected] Cecilia Caballero-Miranda Despite the immense cultural heritage of Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi Aunque el patrimonio cultural de Mesoamérica Instituto de Geofísica, Universidad Nacional Mesoamerica, there is still no reference es cuantioso, aún no se cuenta con una curva Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, archaeomagnetic curve available for de variación secular del campo geomagnético 04510, Coyoacan, CDMX, Mexico. Central Mexico and adjacent areas. The mediante datos arqueomagnéticos para el centro present research has two simultaneous de México y áreas adyacentes. La presente Ma. Luisa Osete-López objectives: to obtain finer characteristics investigación persiguió dos objetivos: obtener Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Departamen- of the geomagnetic field elements over características más precisas de los elementos del to de Física de la Tierra, Astronomía y archaeological past, and to build up a Astrofísica. Universidad Complutense. Plaza campo geomagnético en el pasado arqueológico reliable regional archaeomagnetic dating de Ciencias,1. Ciudad Universitaria. 28040, para el lapso 350 aC. a 1500 dC., además Madrid, Spain. tool for the time span of 350 BC. to 1500 de construir una herramienta de datación AD. For these purposes, 72 previous were arqueomagnética confiable para el centro y Verónica López-Delgado compiled and analyzed with 40 new data Sur de México, región que corresponde con la Posgrado en Ciencias de la Tierra.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in Scottish Archaeology: Scarf Panel Report
    Science in Scottish Archaeology: ScARF Panel Report Images © as noted in the text ScARF Summary Science Panel Document June 2012 ScARF Science in Scottish Archaeology Panel Karen Milek and Richard Jones (eds) With contributions from: Richard Bates, Paul Bishop, Kate Britton, Graeme Cavers, Ruby Ceron-Carrasco, Matthew Collins, Gordon Cook, Dave Cowley, Anne Crone, Alastair Dawson, Sue Dawson, Ian J. Fairchild, Oliver Craig, Andy Dugmore, Richard Jones, Peter Langdon, Roderick McCullagh, Kathleen McSweeney, Ingrid Mainland, Karen Milek, Anthony Newton, Sue Ovenden, Eva Panagiotakopulu, Ed Schofield, Marian Scott, Finlay Stuart, Scott Timpany, Richard Tipping, Lyn Wilson, Rob Wilson Abbreviations ED-XRF Energy-dispersive XRF FT IR Fourier Transform Infra Red spectrometry ICP-ES (MS) Inductively coupled emission spectrometry (mass spectrometry) NAA Neutron activation analysis ORA Organic residue analysis SAGES Scottish Alliance for Geosciences and Society SEM Scanning electron microscope SEM-EDAX SEM with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis XRD X-ray diffraction XRF X-ray fluorescence spectrometry Science in Scottish Archaeology Contents Executive Summary Introduction .................................................................................................................................i 1. Chronology ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNIT 3 ABSOLUTE CHRONOLOGY Relative Chronology
    UNIT 3 ABSOLUTE CHRONOLOGY Relative Chronology Contents 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Absolute Method of Dating 3.3 Radiocarbon Dating or C14 Dating 3.4 Potassium – Argon Method 3.5 Thermoluminescence or TL Dating 3.6 Palaeomagnetic or Archaeomagnetic Dating 3.7 Varve Analysis 3.8 Dendrochronology or Tree-ring Dating 3.9 Amino Acid Racemization Dating 3.10 Oxygen Isotope and Climatic Reconstruction 3.11 Uranium Series Dating 3.12 Summary Suggested Reading Sample Questions Learning Objectives & Once you have studied this unit, you should be able to: Ø define the different types of dating techniques – Relative and Absolute Chronology; Ø understand underlying principles of different absolute dating techniques; Ø understand reasons why particular techniques are appropriate for specific situation; and Ø understand the limitations of different dating techniques. 3.1 INTRODUCTION Archaeological anthropology is unique with respect to the other branches of the social sciences and humanities in its ability to discover, and to arrange in chronological sequence, certain episodes in human history that have long since passed without the legacy of written records. But the contributions of archeology to this sort of reconstruction depend largely on our ability to make chronological orderings, to measure relative amounts of elapsed time, and to relate these units to our modern calendar. Many important problems in archeology like origins, influences, diffusions of ideas or artifacts, the direction of migrations of peoples, rates of change, and sizes of populations in settlements can be solved with the help of different methods of dating. In general, any question that requires a definite statement like the type, A is earlier than B, depends on dating.
    [Show full text]