DOCSLIB.ORG

The Corporate Accountability Coalition 2013 Report Card the Cac

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Corporate Accountability Coalition 2013 Report Card the Cac THE CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY COALITION 2013 REPORT CARD THE CAC The Corporate Accountability Coalition is an alliance of organizations whose work includes a focus on issues of corporate accountability and transparency, abuse of power by corporations, responsible business practices, and the rights of people. The Center for Corporate Policy (CCP) Corporate Accountability International (CAI) CorpWatch EarthRights International (ERI) The Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) The International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (ICAR) Cover Photo: Remains of the 1984 Bhopal Disaster, a devastating example of corporate irresponsibility and lack of accountability. Coming upon the 30th anniversary of the disaster, the area is still polluted, and the corporations responsible have yet to provide adequate remedies to the victims. © Jack Laurenson, 2010 Please send any feedback, comments, and concerns to: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction About this Scorecard ..................................................................................... 2. The State of Corporate Accountability .......................................................... 3. Scoring Methodology .................................................................................... 8 Why are the Scores So Low? ......................................................................... 9 2.013. Results The Senate .....................................................................................................10 Summary of Scored Actions: Senate .............................................................17 The House .....................................................................................................19 Summary of Scored Actions: House ............................................................3.5 Unscored Measures ............................................................................................3.9 Data Visualization Perfect Sores ................................................................................................ 43. 2.013. At-A-Glance ....................................................................................... 44 Highest-Scoring State Delegations ...............................................................45 Lowest-Scoring State Delegations ............................................................... 46 Score Breakdown ..........................................................................................47 Corporate Accountability Coalition 2013 Report Card • 1 ABOUT THIS SCORECARD This is the second edition of the Corporate Accountability Coalition’s Congressional Report Card. The CAC Report Card represents an effort to measure Congress’s commitment to keep the power of large corporations in check, to promote transparency and responsible business practices, and to hold corporations accountable for their actions. Corporations are an important part of modern life and the modern economy, but their interests do not always represent the interests of living, breathing, human beings. This Report Card attempts to serve as an objective measure of Congressional efforts to ensure that protecting people, not corporations, is the primary focus of our laws and policy. Corporate Accountability Coalition 2013 Report Card • 2 THE STATE OF CORPORATE ACCOUNTABILITY 2.10 3. did not see any great improvement toward corporate accountability and reining in corporate influence over our public institutions. Instead, incidents of egregious corporate misconduct continue, and our legislators, courts and regulators have failed to restore the balance. In April of 2.013., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Royal Dutch/Shell, the world’s largest corporation, could not be sued in New York by Nigerians who claimed that Shell was complicit in a brutal crackdown on anti-oil protestors in the Niger Delta. The Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. decision reduces the already limited options to obtain accountability for corporate participation in the worst abuses, such as genocide and slavery. To In 2013, a Pew Research poll date, there has been no legislative response to the showed that 86% of middle class Kiobel decision. adults believed banks were at The United Nations’ Working Group on least partially responsible for Business and Human Rights visited the United States the difficulties facing the middle for ten days in 2.013.; in its time here, the group looked class, and 80% at least partially at a wide array of corporate responsibility issues. In blamed large corporations. its concluding statement, the Working Group found that there was “little appreciation of human rights being material to the conduct of business in the U.S.” As the United States falls behind international efforts on corporate accountability, it is incumbent on Congress to act. Despite Congress’ failure, the American public understands the problem. Surveys have consistently shown grave concerns with unchecked corporate influence. In 2.013., a Pew Research poll showed that 86% of middle class adults believed banks were at least partially responsible for the difficulties facing the middle class, and 80% at least partially blamed large corporations. Earlier surveys have also confirmed that overwhelming majorities of Americans believe that corporations have too much power in Washington and that there is too much corporate money in politics. Corporate Accountability Coalition 2013 Report Card • 3 Increasing corporate power and rights, decreasing corporate accountability A single corporate lobbying group, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, spent nearly $75 million on lobbying Congress in 2.013.. Just ten individual corporations spent over $157 million on lobbying, and thanks to the Supreme Court’s 2.010 Citizens United decision, corporate influence on Washington is no longer limited to lobbying— these entities that have no right to vote can now spend unlimited sums of money to influence elections. As its influence grows, the corporate lobby pushes to reduce accountability. These efforts increasingly limit the ability of ordinary citizens and other victims of corporate abuse to access the courts. Binding arbitration clauses now prevent many workers and consumers from accessing the courts when their rights are violated. In 2.013., corporate lawyers—supported by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce—argued to the Supreme Court that multinational corporations doing business in the United States cannot be sued here—that despite the fact that a corporation may profit from its business here, it can only be sued where it has its headquarters or where it has chosen to incorporate. In fact, the Supreme Court has become increasingly receptive to the Chamber’s arguments; under Chief Justice Roberts, the Court has agreed with the Chamber’s position 72.% of the time, up from only 56% under former Chief Justice Rehnquist. In its 2.012.-2.013. term, the Supreme Court sided with the Chamber 82.% of the time. The financial industry nearly destroyed the global economy in 2.008, yet despite abundant evidence of criminal wrongdoing, not a single high-level corporate executive has been prosecuted. In 2.013., JP Morgan Chase, one of the banks involved in the 2.008 crisis, paid $13. billion in fines as a result of an agreement after an investigation by the Department of Justice. JP Morgan Chase also paid $92.0 million to settle charges by the SEC, the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority, the Federal Reserve, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for its involvement in the “London Whale” trade scandal in 2.012.-2.013.. In both situations, no one faced jail time, and JP Morgan Chase actually received tax breaks on the fines that they paid. Corporate Accountability Coalition 2013 Report Card • 4 The continuing need for transparency and accountability The human cost of this lack of accountability continued to be felt in 2.013.. On April 2.4, 2.013., the Rana Plaza garment factory in Bangladesh collapsed. The factory supplied garments to a number of U.S. retail companies that benefited from the cheap labor and lax enforcement of labor laws, such as factory inspections and protections for organizing unions. The day before the collapse, a local inspector ordered the building evacuated—yet the very next day, employees were forced to return under threat of losing their jobs. The collapse killed over 1,100 workers. The victims and their families still have not been adequately compensated, and the majority of those U.S. companies have continued to refuse signing the legally binding Bangladesh Accord on Fire and Building Safety, instead creating their own voluntary, non- binding agreement. By contrast, a The U.S. Chamber of Commerce number of European companies have signed the spent nearly $75 million lobbying Accord. Congress in 2013. In1 2.0 3., Chevron pleaded no contest to criminal charges of violating labor and health codes surrounding the 2.012. refinery fire in Richmond, California, which forced thousands to evacuate their homes and caused more than 15,000 people to seek medical attention for respiratory problems. Chevron was asked to pay $2. million. While the Contra Costa County District Attorney applauded “Chevron’s commitment to do more than what is required by law in order to help ensure nothing like this ever happens again,” that same year, Chevron was responsible for another refinery fire in Mississippi, which resulted in the death of a Chevron employee. In Arkansas, Exxon Mobil’s Pegasus pipeline burst, spilling over 2.00,000 gallons of crude oil. The notice from Pipeline and Hazardous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 11. Fire Alarms and Democratic Accountability Charles M. Cameron and Sanford C. Gordon
    Chapter 11. Fire Alarms and Democratic Accountability Charles M. Cameron and Sanford C. Gordon 1 Introduction Accountability is a situation that prevails in any relationship between a principal and agent in which the latter takes some action for which she may be \held to account" { that is, made to answer for those actions under a system of rewards and sanctions administered by the former. In a democratic setting, the electorate are the principals and public officials the agents; rewards and sanctions the loss or retention of the benefits, privileges, and powers of office-holding. Absent electoral accountability, citizens must fall back on the benevolence of their rulers or just plain luck. History shows these are weak reeds indeed. Thus, the accountability (or unaccountability) of elected officials to voters is a key component of any comprehensive theory of democratic governance. Electoral accountability faces huge obstacles in practice. One of the most pernicious is the problem of asymmetric information: while knowing what politicians are up to is surely a critical ingredient of holding incumbent officeholders to account, for most voters, becoming and remaining informed about whether elected officials are actually meeting their obligations can be tedious, time- consuming and difficult. How many citizens have the leisure to research the voting record of their member of Congress, for instance? And even then, outside of a few specific areas, how many have the knowledge to assess whether a given legislative enactment actually improved their welfare, all things considered? A lack of transparency about actions and the obscurity between means and ends can render nominal accountability completely moot in practice.1 In the face of prohibitive information costs, a simple intuition is the following: any mechanism that lowers informational costs for voters ought to enhance electoral accountability.
    [Show full text]
  • WF Council Discuss State's Public Employee Retirement System Mtsd
    Ad Populos, Non Aditus, Pervenimus Published Every Thursday Since September 3, 1890 (908) 232-4407 USPS 680020 Thursday, August 9, 2012 OUR 122nd YEAR – ISSUE NO. 32-2012 Periodical – Postage Paid at Rahway, N.J. www.goleader.com [email protected] SEVENTY FIVE CENTS WF Council Discuss State’s Public Employee Retirement System By LAUREN S. BARR quired analysis and certification of in PERS was not offered to Mr. Specially Written for The Westfield Leader employees’ eligibility to participate Finestein when he was hired as town WESTFIELD – The discussion in PERS. attorney following Mr. Cockren’s at Tuesday night’s Westfield Town Mr. Blake also questioned who retirement, as new part-time em- Council meeting centered around advised Mr. Gildea when he re- ployees were not eligible for the pensions following the issuance of sponded to a 2011 inquiry from the pension. a report by State Comptroller Mat- comptroller, as asking then town Editors note: According to pub- thew Boxer which criticized mu- attorney Robert Cockren would lic records available on the Internet nicipalities for allowing profes- have been a “conflict of interest.” at www.app.com/section/DATA/ sional service contractors to remain Mr. Blake said that the town “can- DataUniverse, Mr. Cockren receives in the state’s Public Employee Re- not ask the fox whether or not he $35,753 annual pension from PERS. tirement System (PERS). likes the accommodations inside the The data is: Resident John Blake praised cur- hen house.” He also said that Mr. Cockren, Robert, Westfield Town, rent Town Attorney Russ Finestein Finestein “wanted more money than PERS - Public Employee Retire- for his “knowledge of the law” since [he] was being offered” for the po- ment System, $65,024 (final aver- he is not participating in PERS.
    [Show full text]
  • Why AWS for Gxp Regulated Workloads? an Executive Summary
    Why AWS for GxP regulated workloads? An executive summary Move, or build, GxP workloads in the cloud with help from the AWS Life Sciences Practice The AWS life sciences practice and dedicated GxP experts help biopharma and medical device companies build new, or move, regulated workloads to the cloud. Organizations can achieve higher productivity, increased operational resilience, greater agility, improved transparency and traceability, and a lower TCO1 and carbon footprint on AWS2 compared to on-premises systems. AWS offers a secure cloud platform for automating compliance processes and providing enhanced management related to running your GxP workloads. Some of the biggest enterprises and innovative startups in life sciences have moved, or built new GxP systems on the AWS Cloud. Decades of expertise in the life sciences space enable us to help you move away from on-premises regulatory paradigms as your trusted advisor to becoming regulated cloud native. Evidence of success: Evidence of success: AWS customers AWS partners Moderna power their R&D and manufacturing Aizon use AWS to enable real-time visibility and environments on AWS to accelerate the development predictive insights that address GxP compliance. of mRNA therapeutics and vaccines. Idorsia house 90% of IT operations on AWS, including Core Informatics developed a platform on AWS that GxP compliant virtual data centers, giving them 75% enables GxP-validated applications in the cloud for cost savings compared to physical data centers its customers. Bristol Myers Squibb use AWS to create consistent, Tracelink choose AWS to support its life science scalable, and repeatable process to streamline cloud solution to meet customer compliance needs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Timeline 1970S and Before
    NJ Election Law Enforcement Commission- A Historical Timeline By Joseph Donohue, Deputy Director (Updated 10/2/17) 1970s and Before October 16, 1964- Governor Richard Hughes enacts New Jersey’s first lobbying law (Chapter 207). It requires any lobbyist who makes $500 or more in three months or spends that much to influence legislation to register with the Secretary of State. Trenton attorney John Heher, representing American Mutual Insurance Alliance of Chicago, becomes the state’s first registered lobbyist.1 New Jersey Education Association, historically one of the most powerful lobbyists in the capitol, registers for the first time on December 15, 1964.2 September 1, 1970- The interim report of the bipartisan New Jersey Election Law Revision Commission concludes “stringent disclosure requirements on every aspect of political financing must be imposed and enforce at every election level….If there were full public disclosure and publication of all campaign contributions and expenditures during a campaign, the voters themselves could better judge whether a candidate has spent too much.” It recommends creation of a 5-member Election Law Enforcement Commission and a tough enforcement strategy: “withhold the issuance of a certificate of election to a candidate who has not complied with the provisions of this act.”3 November 13, 1971- A new lobbying law (Chapter 183) takes effect, repealing the 1964 act and transferring all jurisdiction to the Attorney General. It requires lobbyists to wear badges in the Statehouse for the first time and file quarterly reports that list the bills they are supporting or opposing. April 7, 1972- Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 requires disclosure of campaign contributions and expenditures for federal candidates.4 June 17, 1972- Break-in occurs at the Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate office complex in Washington, DC.
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Conflicts of Interest
    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Anti-Bribery Guidance Chapter 11 Transparency International (TI) is the world’s leading non-governmental anti-corruption organisation. With more than 100 chapters worldwide, TI has extensive global expertise and understanding of corruption. Transparency International UK (TI-UK) is the UK chapter of TI. We raise awareness about corruption; advocate legal and regulatory reform at national and international levels; design practical tools for institutions, individuals and companies wishing to combat corruption; and act as a leading centre of anti-corruption expertise in the UK. Acknowledgements: We would like to thank DLA Piper, FTI Consulting and the members of the Expert Advisory Committee for advising on the development of the guidance: Andrew Daniels, Anny Tubbs, Fiona Thompson, Harriet Campbell, Julian Glass, Joshua Domb, Sam Millar, Simon Airey, Warwick English and Will White. Special thanks to Jean-Pierre Mean and Moira Andrews. Editorial: Editor: Peter van Veen Editorial staff: Alice Shone, Rory Donaldson Content author: Peter Wilkinson Project manager: Rory Donaldson Publisher: Transparency International UK Design: 89up, Jonathan Le Marquand, Dominic Kavakeb Launched: October 2017 © 2018 Transparency International UK. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in parts is permitted providing that full credit is given to Transparency International UK and that any such reproduction, in whole or in parts, is not sold or incorporated in works that are sold. Written permission must be sought from Transparency International UK if any such reproduction would adapt or modify the original content. If any content is used then please credit Transparency International UK. Legal Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Ethics: a Panacea for Reducing Corruption and Enhancing National Development
    Nigerian Journal of Business Education (NIGJBED) Volume 5 No.2, 2018 BUSINESS ETHICS: A PANACEA FOR REDUCING CORRUPTION AND ENHANCING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AKPANOBONG, UYAI EMMANUEL, Ph.D. Department of Vocational Education, Faculty of Education, University of Uyo Email:[email protected] Abstract In recent times there are scandals of unethical behaviours, corrupt practices, lack of accountability and transparency amongst public officials, political office holders, business managers and employees in the country. Therefore, there is an urgent need for public sector institutions to strengthen the ethics of their profession, integrity, honesty, transparency, confidentiality, and accountability in the public service. The paper further attempt to discuss the need for business ethics and some practices and behaviours which undermined the ethical behaviours of public official with strong emphasis on corruptions causes and preventions, conflicts of interest, consequences of unethical behaviour and resources management. The paper also outlined some measures on how to combat the evil called corruption in public service and business organizations. It is concluded that if all measures are taken into consideration the National Development may be achieved. Keywords: Ethics, unethical, transparency, accountability, corruption. Introduction In every business organization, there must be a laid down rules, values norms, order and other guiding principles which may be in form of ethics. The essence of this is to guide both the employer and the employees in achieving the organizational goals and at the same time help in checks and balances. Luanne (2017 saw ethics as the principles and values an individual uses to govern his activities and decisions. Therefore, Business Ethics could be described as that aspect of corporate governance that has to do with the moral values of managers encouraging them to be transparent in business dealing (Chienweike, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Suggestions from Social Accountability International
    Suggestions from Social Accountability International (SAI) on the work agenda of the UN Working Group on Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises Social Accountability International (SAI) is a non-governmental, international, multi-stakeholder organization dedicated to improving workplaces and communities by developing and implementing socially responsible standards. SAI recognizes the value of the UN Working Group’s mandate to promote respect for human rights by business of all sizes, as the implementation of core labour standards in company supply chains is central to SAI’s own work. SAI notes that the UN Working Group emphasizes in its invitation for proposals from relevant actors and stakeholders, the importance it places not only on promoting the Guiding Principles but also and especially on their effective implementation….resulting in improved outcomes . SAI would support this as key and, therefore, has teamed up with the Netherlands-based ICCO (Interchurch Organization for Development) to produce a Handbook on How To Respect Human Rights in the International Supply Chain to assist leading companies in the practical implementation of the Ruggie recommendations. SAI will also be offering classes and training to support use of the Handbook. SAI will target the Handbook not just at companies based in Western economies but also at those in emerging countries such as Brazil and India that have a growing influence on the world’s economy and whose burgeoning base of small and medium companies are moving forward in both readiness, capacity and interest in managing their impact on human rights. SAI has long term relationships working with businesses in India and Brazil, where national companies have earned SA8000 certification and where training has been provided on implementing human rights at work to numerous businesses of all sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability
    Hastings Business Law Journal Volume 16 Number 1 Winter 2020 Article 3 Winter 2020 From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan Daoning Zhang Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons Recommended Citation Min Yan and Daoning Zhang, From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability, 16 Hastings Bus. L.J. 43 (2020). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_business_law_journal/vol16/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Business Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 - YAN _ZHANG - V9 - KC - 10.27.19.DOCX (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2019 11:11 AM From Corporate Responsibility to Corporate Accountability Min Yan* and Daoning Zhang** I. INTRODUCTION The concept of corporate responsibility or corporate social responsibility (“CSR”) keeps evolving since it appeared. The emphasis was first placed on business people’s social conscience rather than on the company itself, which was well reflected by Howard Bowen’s landmark book, Social Responsibilities of the Businessman.1 Then CSR was defined as responsibilities to society, which extends beyond economic and legal obligations by corporations.2 Since then, corporate responsibility is thought to begin where the law ends. 3 In other words, the concept of social responsibility largely excludes legal obedience from the concept of social responsibility. An analysis of 37 of the most used definitions of CSR also shows “voluntary” as one of the most common dimensions.4 Put differently, corporate responsibility reflects the belief that corporations have duties beyond generating profits for their shareholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions, Organizations and Individuals Advocating for Corporate Accountability Condemn Chevron's Retaliatory Attacks on H
    Institutions, Organizations and Individuals Advocating for Corporate Accountability Condemn Chevron’s Retaliatory Attacks on Human Rights and Corporate Accountability Advocates and See it as a Serious Threat to Open Society and Due Process of Law January 23, 2014 - We, the undersigned organizations and individuals, condemn the actions by Chevron in its efforts to silence critics and ignore a $9.5 billion judgment against it for environmental damage in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Chevron’s actions set a dangerous precedent and represent a growing and serious threat to the ability of civil society to hold corporations accountable for their misdeeds around the world. Since Chevron launched its attack on those who have been working for decades to pressure the company to clean up the environmental damage caused by its operations in the Ecuadorian Amazon, independent journalists have been forced to turn over their material and nonprofit watchdog groups have faced massive legal actions designed to cripple their ability to work and undermine their ability to grow support for their efforts. Attacks Free Speech In a move opposed by The New York Times, ABC, CBS, NBC, Dow Jones, the Associated Press, the Hearst Newspapers, the Daily News, and the Gannett Company, Chevron used its legal might to launch a major threat to independent journalism when it won a decision to force documentary producer and director Joe Berlinger to turn over to Chevron more than 600 hours of raw footage. Chevron has also targeted nonprofit environmental and indigenous rights groups and individual activists with subpoenas designed to cripple their effectiveness and chill their speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Westfield BOE Urges Passage of Roof Bond, Extends School Year by KIMBERLY A
    Ad Populos, Non Aditus, Pervenimus Published Every Thursday Since September 3, 1890 (908) 232-4407 USPS 680020 Thursday, November 29, 2012 OUR 122nd YEAR – ISSUE NO. 48-2012 Periodical – Postage Paid at Rahway, N.J. www.goleader.com [email protected] SEVENTY FIVE CENTS Westfield BOE Urges Passage of Roof Bond, Extends School Year By KIMBERLY A. BROADWELL bond referendum is approved the roofs these types of cuts affect class size, Specially Written for The Westfield Leader are scheduled to be completed by 2014. classes themselves and programs where WESTFIELD – Westfield Board of Superintendent of schools Margaret cuts have to be made. She said the Education members discussed the up- Dolan reported Tuesday that the rejec- ongoing commitment to technology coming $13.6-million roof referendum tion of the bond would delay the roof would have to stop which would give for a district-wide roof replacement at work and that money would have to the district an additional $500,000. Tuesday night’s BOE meeting. The come from reserve accounts that have Ms. Dolan has said the average age referendum vote is scheduled for Tues- already been allocated to other mainte- of the Westfield school buildings is 73 day, December 11. nance projects. This, she explained, years and years of fixing, patching and Voters rejected a $17-million refer- would mean that other maintenance repairing roofs lasted longer than ex- endum in September that included the projects would be placed on hold and pected. roofs as well as a $3.5-million lighted technology upgrades may have to stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Accountability International (SAI) and Social Accountability Accreditation Services (SAAS)
    Social Accountability International (SAI) and Social Accountability Accreditation Services (SAAS) Profile completed by Erika Ito, Kaylena Katz, and Chris Wegemer Last edited June 25, 2014 History of organization In 1996, the Social Accountability International (SAI) Advisory Board was created to establish a set of workplace standards in order to “define and verify implementation of ethical workplaces.” This was published as the first manifestation of SA8000 in 1997.1 The SAI Advisory Board was created by the Council on Economic Priorities (CEP) in response to public concern about working conditions abroad. Until the summer of 2000, this new entity was known as the Council on Economic Priorities Accreditation Agency, or CEPAA.2 Founded in 1969, the Council on Economic Priorities, a largely corporate­funded nonprofit research organization, was “a public service research organization dedicated to accurate and impartial analysis of the social and environmental records of corporations” and aimed to “to enhance the incentives for superior corporate social and environmental performance.”3 The organization was known for its corporate rating system4 and its investigations of the US defense industry.5 Originally, SAI had both oversight of the SA8000 standard and accreditation of auditors. In 2007, the accreditation function of SAI was separated from the organization, forming Social Accountability Accreditation Services (SAAS).6 The operations and governance of SAI and SAAS remain inexorably intertwined; SAI cannot function without the accreditation services of SAAS, and SAAS would not exist without SAI’s maintenance of the SA8000 standards and training guidelines. They see each other as a “related body,” which SAAS defines as “a separate legal entity that is linked by common ownership or contractual arrangements to the accreditation body.”7 Because of this interdependence, they are often treated by activists and journalists as a single entity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor
    From Unknown to Known: Asking the Right Questions to The Story Behind Our Stuff Trace Abuses in Global Supply Chains DOWNLOAD ILAB’S COMPLY CHAIN AND APPS TODAY! Explore the key elements Discover of social best practice COMPLY CHAIN compliance 8 guidance Reduce child labor and forced systems 3 labor in global supply chains! 7 4 NEW! Explore more than 50 real 6 Assess risks Learn from world examples of best practices! 5 and impacts innovative in supply chains NEW! Discover topics like company responsible recruitment and examples worker voice! NEW! Learn to improve engagement with stakeholders on issues of social compliance! ¡Disponible en español! Disponible en français! Check Browse goods countries' produced with efforts to child labor or eliminate forced labor 1,000+ pages of research in child labor the palm of your hand! NEW! Examine child labor data on 131 countries! Review Find child NEW! Check out the Mexico laws and labor data country profile for the first time! ratifications NEW! Uncover details on 25 additions and 1 removal for the List of Goods! How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. On Your Computer All three of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor. These reports include Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005; and List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126.
    [Show full text]